THE SCHEME TO DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND THE U.S.A. ITS AGENCIES IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 317 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT!! THE LARGEST, BIGGEST LAWSUIT IN THE HISTORY OF THE WORLD!!

THE PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY

“GAVE THE RED DRAGON AS DEFINED IN THE HOLY BIBLE REVELATION 12:3 “And another sign appeared in heaven: behold, a great, fiery red dragon having seven heads and ten horns, and seven diadems on his heads.-CHINA” TO BRING THE “ANTI-CHRIST”

CLINTON(HUSBAND AND WIFE TAG TEAM) AND CHINA CONSPIRACY TO “help china to become a #1 or 2 economy”(AND THE DRAGON GAVE THE Antichrist it’s power)train chinese troops on american soil via trade, in turn cause trade tensions and eventually a CHINA/U.S. WAR UNDER THE GUISE “trade war tensions” DESTROY AMERICA, RESTRAINED COMMERCE AND DEFRAUD TWO WITNESSES, GAVE – INDEPT THE U.S.A.

CHINA CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD THE U.S.A. IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 371

AMERICA NOW INDEPTED TO CHINA BASED ON BILL CLINTON(AND/OR HILLARY CLINTON-PASS THE CRIMINAL TORCH TO DESTROY AMERICA – TAG TEAM)

T

TRUMP GUISE, SIMULTANOUSELY CONSPIRING WITH XI JINPING, DOCTOR FAUCCI TO UNLEASH THE DEADLY BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS – CORONAVIRUS ON HUMANITY AND CONSPIRING WITH U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, PHARCU, BIG TECH, BILL GATES TO DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES TO FUND THE COV-19 “PLANDEMIC” GLOBALLY

si·mul·ta·ne·ous·ly

/ˌsīməlˈtānēəslē/

Learn to pronounce

“FAKE” SIM

FORMAL CRIMINAL CHARGES AGAINST JOE BIDEN IN HIS OFFICIAL C, KAMALA HARRIS, MERRICK GARLAND, DONALD TRUMP, ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES “CLASS REPRESENTATIVES” ET AL(THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENT IS BEING AMENDED)AS FOLLOWS:

NOTICE OF BILL OF PARTICULAR AS FOLLOWS:

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER RE PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND EXTRADICTION ARREST WARRANTS AND ARREST WARRANTS AS FOLLOWS:

NOTICE OF ADMIRALITY AND MARITIME CLAIM ENTITLED “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR VS. JOE BIDEN IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS PRESIDENT AND/OR INDIVIDUALLY, KAMALA HARRIS IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS PRESIDENT AND/OR INDIVIDUALLY AND/OR MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR INDIVIDUALLY(CLASS REPRESENTATIVE) FOR $125,000,000,000,0000,0000.00 TRILLION DOLLARS PURSUANT TO COMMON LAW REMEDIES VIA ADMIRALTY AND/OR MARITIME LAW AS FOLLOWS:

NOTICE OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT – A FINAL JUDGMENT OR DECREE RENDERED IN THE FAVOR OF THE UNITED STATES PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1964(D)IN ANY CRIMINAL PROCEEDING BROUGHT BY THE UNITED STATES SHALL ESTOP THE DEFENDANTS(JOE BIDEN IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS PRESIDENT, KAMALA HARRIS, ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, MAJOR CORPORATIONS ET AL) FROM DENYING THE ESSENTIAL ALLEGATIONS OF THE CRIMINAL OFFENSE IN ANY SUBSEQUENT CIVIL PROCEEDING BROUGHT BY THE UNITED STATES – “THE FOLLOWING PROCEEDING IS BROUGHT BY “THE 50 UNITED STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR VS. JOE BIDEN IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY, KAMALA HARRIS HIS HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY ET AL

DECLARATORY JUDGMENT THAT ALL PARTIES ARE IN DEFAULT/DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND ENTERS A DEFAULT JUDGMENT FOR 125,000,000,000,000,000.00 TRILLION DOLLARS IN FAVOR OF “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR” VS. JOE BIDEN IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS VICE PRESIDENT AND/OR PRESIDENT AND/OR INDIVIDUALLY, KAMALA HARRIS IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA, SENATOR AND/OR VICE PRESIDENT AND/OR INDIVIDUALLY, DONALD TRUMP IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS PRESIDENT AND/OR BUSINESS MAN AND/OR INDIVIDUALLY, MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS CHIEF JUDGE FOR THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS D.C. CIRCUIT AND/OR U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, JOHN G. ROBERTS IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT AND/OR INDIVIDUALLY, STEVEN BREYER IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS U.S. SUPREME COURT JUDGE AND/OR INDIVIDUALLY, CLARENCE THOMAS IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ASSOCIATE JUSTICE FOR THE SUPREME COURT JUDGE AND/OR INDIVIDUAL, SAMUEL A. ALITO JR. IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ASSOCIATE JUSTICE FOR THE SUPREME COURT JUDGE AND/OR INDIVIDUALLY, SONIA SOTOMAYOR IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ASSOCIATE JUSTICE FOR THE SUPREME COURT JUDGE AND/OR INDIVIDUALLY, ELENA KAGAN IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ASSOCIATE JUSTICE FOR THE SUPREME COURT JUDGE AND/OR INDIVIDUALLY, NEIL M. GORSUCH IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ASSOCIATE JUSTICE FOR THE SUPREME COURT JUDGE AND/OR INDIVIDUALLY, BRETT M. KAVANAUGH IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ASSOCIATE JUSTICE FOR THE SUPREME COURT JUDGE, KENTANJI BROWN JACKSON IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ASSOCIATE JUSTICE FOR THE SUPREME COURT JUDGE AND/OR INDIVIDUALLY,

JACOB ROTHCHILD “OWNER AND CONTROL OF MOST IF NOT ALL BANKS, THE U.S. FEDERAL RESERVE,

KNOWINGLY, INTENTIONALLY FALSE INTENTIONAL MISREPRESENTATION TO COERCE BOTH SHARON AND/OR JAMES TO ENTER RENTAL AGREEMENT TO HELP ADVANCE THE TWO WITNESSES AS FOLLOWS, AND IS EXPLAINED HOW THE PERPEPATORS COMMITTED RACKETEERING ACTS AS DEFINED IN 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1961(1) BELOW:

PROOF OF SERVICE AND/OR CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE VIA CERTIFIED MAIL TO AS FOLLOWS:

PROOF OF SERVICE #1

PROOF OF SERVICE #2

PROOF OF SERVICE #3

OVERNIGHT MAIL TO MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS CHIEF JUDGE FOR THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS D.C. CIRCUIT AS FOLLOWS:

THE DOCUMENTS TO THIS ABOVE ARE LISTED IN THE RACKETEERING PREDICATE ACTS COMMITTED AGAINST THE TWO WITNESSES BY THE PERPETRATORS BELOW

ADMIRALTY AND MARTIME CLAIM FOR $125,000.000.000.000.000.00 TRILLION- SEE THIS WEBSITE) FOR FAILURE TO DEFEND OR OTHERWISE DEFEND, AND FOR FAILURE AS SHOWN IN ONE OR MORE AFFIDIVANTS SUBMITTED, DENIAL OF COURT ACCESS AND DISMISSAL OF 45 OR CASES FROM AUG. 2008 THRU TO 2017, DECLARING THAT PROPERTY IS FORFEITED TO “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL” AND IS ALLOWED TO APPOINT RECEIVERS, CONSERVATORS, APPRAISERS, ACCOUNTANTS OR TRUSTEE TO PROTECT THE INTEREST OF THE 50 STATES & PROPERTY ORDERED FORFEITED DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AND/OR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF THAT MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS CHIEF JUDGE FOR THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ON OR ABOUT JULY 5, 2019, KNOWINGLY, INTENTIONALLY, ADOPTED THE ACTS OF ONE OR MORE JACOB ROTHCHILD[OWNER AND CONTROLLER OF WORLD BANKS-MONEY LAUNDERING, ETC.], OBAMA, U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, ENGAGED IN A PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY DEVISE A SCHEME WITH ONE OR MORE DONALD TRUMP, JOE BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS ET AL TO DEFRAUD BOTH SHARON BRIDGEWATER AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER FOR OBTAINING MONEY OR PROPERTY BY MEANS OF FALSE, FRAUDULANT PRETENSES, REPRESENTATIONS, AND TRANSMITS OR CAUSES TO BE TRANSMITTED BY MEANS OF WIRE, RADIO, TELEVISION COMMUNICATION IN INTERSTATE OR FOREIGN COMMERCE, ONE WRITING, SIGNS, SIGNALS, PICTURES OR SOUNDS FOR EXECUTING THE SCHEME OR TO ARTIFICE, IN U.S CONTINUES TO COMMIT CRIMINAL ACTS, OF WIRE FRAUD IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. 1343 IN CASE ENTITLED SHARON BRIDGEWATER VS. DONALD TRUMP 19-1141 IN THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS AND ILLEGALLY, UNLAWFULLY UPSURPS THE PUBLIC OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL BY FORCE AND IS DONALD TRUMP, WILLIAM BARR ET AL “RACKETEERING CRIMINAL PARTNER” AND IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE JAN. 6, 2021 CAPITOL ATTACKS – SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY, IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S. Code § 2384, AND 18 U.S. Code § 2381 TREASON MAKING INTENTIONAL MISREPRESENTATIONS TO BOTH SHARON AND JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER AND/OR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ABOUT THE COV-19 INJECTION-SEE BELOW)

“THE 50 UNITED STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR” GIVES IS NOTICE OF FORFEITURE PURSUANT TO

DECLARATORY JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO ONE OR MORE “RICO LAWS” AND/OR 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1962, MERRICK GARLAND ET AL FORFEITS TO “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR”

DELCARATORY JUDGEMENT AND PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1962, MERRICK GARLAND AND OTHER CO-CONSPIRATORS SHALL BE IMPRISONMENT NOT MORE THAN 20 YEARS BASED ON RACKETEERING ACTIVITY FOR WHICH THE MAXIMUM PENALTY INCLUDES LIFE IN PRISON, ALL NAMED DEFENDANTS AND/OR CO-CONSPIRATORS SHALL.

(1) any interest the person has acquired or maintained in violation of section 1962;

(2) any

(A) interest in;

(B) security of;

(C) claim against; or

(D) property or contractual right of any kind affording a source of influence over;

any enterprise which the person has established, operated, controlled, conducted, or participated in the conduct of, in violation of section 1962; and

(3) any property constituting, or derived from, any proceeds which the person obtained, directly or indirectly, from racketeering activity or unlawful debt collection in violation of section 1962.

The court, in imposing sentence on such person shall order, in addition to any other sentence imposed pursuant to this section, that the person forfeit to the United States all property described in this subsection. In lieu of a fine otherwise authorized by this section, a defendant who derives profits or other proceeds from an offense may be fined not more than twice the gross profits or other proceeds.



ALL PROPERTY INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO:

(1) real property, including things growing on, affixed to, and found in land; and

(2) tangible and intangible personal property, including rights, privileges, interests, claims, and securities.

(c) All right, title, and interest in property described in subsection (a) vests in the United States upon the commission of the act giving rise to forfeiture under this section. Any such property that is subsequently transferred to a person other than the defendant may be the subject of a special verdict of forfeiture and thereafter shall be ordered forfeited to the United States, unless the transferee establishes in a hearing pursuant to subsection (l) that he is a bona fide purchaser for value of such property who at the time of purchase was reasonably without cause to believe that the property was subject to forfeiture under this section.

“THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR VS. JOE BIDEN IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS PRESIDENT AND/OR INDIVIDUALLY, KAMALA HARRIS IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS PRESIDENT AND/OR INDIVIDUALLY AND/OR MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR INDIVIDUALLY(CLASS REPRESENTATIVE) FOR $125,000,000,000,0000,0000.00 TRILLION DOLLARS COMES NOW ATTORNEY FOR THE “THE 50 STATES & THE PEOPLE OF THE 50 STATES” VIA THE 50 STATES EX REL SHRON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/RELATOR -“PROSECUTOR” WITH THIS “CLASS ACTION CRIMINAL PROSECUTION” PURSUANT TO THE RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATION ACT(RICO) WHICH PERMITS A PRIVATE PERSON TO ACT AS PROSECUTOR(AND WITH . PURSUANT TO COMMON LAW REMEDIES VIA ADMIRALTY AND/OR MARITIME LAW AS FOLLOWS:

THE ENTIRE RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATION LAW CAN BE FOUND AS FOLLOWS:

https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/content/rico-act.html

“THE 50 UNITED STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR” WILL SHOW AND PROVE BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT AS FOLLOWS THAT:

(1) that an enterprise existed; (2) that the enterprise affected interstate commerce; (3) that the defendant was associated with or employed by the enterprise; (4) that the defendant engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity; and (5) that the defendant conducted or participated in the conduct of the enterprise through that pattern of racketeering activity through the commission of at least two acts of racketeering activity as set forth in the indictment. United States v. Phillips, 664 F. 2d 971, 1011 (5th Cir. Unit B Dec. 1981), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1136, 102 S. Ct. 1265, 73 L. Ed. 2d 1354 (1982).

#1

THE “INTERNATIONAL/TRANSNATIONAL “BIOTERRORIST PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION” IS AN ENTERPRISE AND CONTINUES TO FUNCTION AS AN ENTERPRISE AS DEFINED IN 18 U.S.C.A. § 1961(4) CONSIST AND/OR CONTINUE TO CONSIST OF ONE OR MORE AS FOLLOWS:

Individuals, partnerships, corporations, associations, or other legal entity, or a union or group of individuals associated in fact although not a legal entity 18 U.S.C.A. §  1961(4) (West 1984). Many courts have noted that Congress mandated a liberal construction of the RICO statute in order to effectuate its remedial purposes by holding that the term “enterprise” has an expansive statutory definition. United States v. Delano, 825 F. Supp. 534, 538-39 (W.D.N.Y. 1993), aff’d in part, rev’d in part, 55 F. 3d 720 (2d Cir. 1995), cases cited therein.

#2

THE “INTERNATIONAL/TRANSNATIONAL “BIOTERRORIST PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE” COMMITTED MULTIPLE PREDICATE ACTS 18 U.S.C. § 1961(1) AND ENGAGED IN A PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY WITHIN TEN YEARS OF EACH OTHER AS DEFINED IN 18 U.S.C.A. § 1961(5) ACTS OF RACKETEERING WITHIN TEN YEARS 18 U.S.C.A. § 1961(5)OF EACH OTHER ENGAGED INAS FOLLOWS:

A SUMMARY PROCEEDING LAWSUIT – UNLAWFUL DETAINER(WHICH REQUIRES STRICT COMPLAINCE WITH CALIFORNIA LAW BECAUSE IT IS A SUMMARY PROCEEDING)THE “TWO YEAR” UNLAWFUL DETAINER LAWSUIT(A SUMMARY PROCEEDING WHICH REQUIRES STRICT COMPLAINCE WITH CALIFORNIA LAW)

KNOWINGLY, INTENTIONALLY FALSE INTENTIONAL MISREPRESENTATION TO COERCE BOTH SHARON AND/OR JAMES TO ENTER RENTAL AGREEMENT TO HELP ADVANCE THE TWO WITNESSES AS FOLLOWS:

CONTRACT PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY TWO PREDICATE ACTS WITHIN TEN YEARS(2 STIPULATED JUDGMENTS AS FOLLOWS), TWO PREDICATE ACTS WITHIN TEN YEAR PERIOD AS FOLLOWS:

PREDICATE ACTS – 2006

Hayes Valley Limited Partnership a Public/Private Partnership ”
State nowingly, intentionallly, willfully, acted under the color of Federal and/or State law, discriminated against both Sharon Bridgewater and/or James S. Bridgewater socialAfrican American “Real Estate” Minority Business Owners, ” on the account of race, class, socio-economic status, disability and/or religion denied and/or deprive one or both witnesses one or more of the two witnesses1st, 2nd, 4th, 6th, 8th, 13th, 14th 18 U.S. Code § 242, THE RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS IN EVICTION PROCEEDINGS.

Whoever, having devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, transmits or causes to be transmitted by means of wire, radio, or television communication in interstate or foreign commerce, any writings, signs, signals, pictures, or sounds for the purpose of executing such scheme or artifice, 

• knowingly and willfully, filed “under seal” 
• falsified, concealed, or covered up by trick, scheme, or device a material fact;  made a material false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation about Bridgewater a party not part of that proceeding; or
• made or used a false writing or document knowing the same to contain a material false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry; (“exploited Bridgewater’s name-identity theft”) about Bridgewater a party not part of the judicial proceeding in violation of 18 USC section Code section 1001 

PREDICATE ACT #1 MAIL FRAUD IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S. Code § 1341

 (1) having devised or intending to devise a scheme to defraud (or to perform specified fraudulent acts), and (2) use of the mail for the purpose of executing, or attempting to execute, the scheme (or specified fraudulent acts).”

California law requires a landlord to enter the “total exact amount due in dollars and cents” which the below does not have!

Whoever, having devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, transmits or causes to be transmitted by means of wire, radio, or television communication in interstate or foreign commerce, any writings, signs, signals, pictures, or sounds for the purpose of executing such scheme or artifice, 

NOTICE TO PAY RENT OR QUIT

PREDICATE ACT #2

FALSE DECLARATIONS ETC. ABUSE OF PROCESS, MALICIOUS PROSECUTION, the malicious and deliberate misuse of regularly issued civil or criminal court process that is not justified by the underlying legal action.

hayes Valley Limited Partnership(the “Public/Private” Partnership)Whoever under oath (or in any declaration, certificate, verification, or statement under penalty of perjury as permitted under section 1746 of title 28, United States Code) in any proceeding before or ancillary to any court or grand jury of the United States knowingly makes any false material declaration or makes or uses any other information, including any book, paper, document, record, recording, or other material, knowing the same to contain any false material declaration in violation of 18 U.S.C. section 1623

PREDICATE ACT #3

SCHEME TO DEFRAUD BOTH SHARON AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER, VIA ONE OR MORE MAIL FRAUD, WIRE FRAUD, EXTORTION UNDER THE COLOR OF OFFICIAL RIGHT, IN VIOLATION OF ONE OR MORE HOBBS ACT, 18 U.S.C. § 1951,

THE CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE MADE A “INTENTIONAL FALSE COMMUNICATION VIA A STIPULATED JUDGMENT(CONTAINS MOST IF NOT ALL PROVISION WHICH VIOLATES U.S. HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT(HUD) POLICIES AND WHICH WAS NOT DUE PROCESS OF LAW)THE JUDGMENT WAS TO COERCE AND/OR THREATEN THE TWO WITNESSES TO GIVE MONEY THEY WERE NOT ENTITLED TO, IN EXCHANGE TO REMAIN IN THE HOUSING UNIT, IT WAS DONE WITH THE INTENT TO EXTORT MONEY OR TO THREATEN BOTH THE WITNESS, AND WAS DONE IN THE PUBLIC OFFICIALS OFFICIAL ACT.

THE CRIMINAL ENTERPI

• Communication;
• Threatening accusation of any crime or offense or any injury to the person or property or mother, father, husband, wife, or child of another,
• With intent to extort money or pecuniary advantage as to compel the person so threatened to do or refrain from doing an act against his/her will.

 “public official has obtained a payment to which he was not entitled, knowing that the payment was made in return for official acts.”

One or more knowingly, intentionally, gentionally abused the court

H

PREDICATE ACT #4

FALSE DECLARATIONS ETC. ABUSE OF PROCESS, MALICIOUS PROSECUTION, the malicious and deliberate misuse of regularly issued civil or criminal court process that is not justified by the underlying legal action.

hayes Valley Limited Partnership(the “Public/Private” Partnership)Whoever under oath (or in any declaration, certificate, verification, or statement under penalty of perjury as permitted under section 1746 of title 28, United States Code) in any proceeding before or ancillary to any court or grand jury of the United States knowingly makes any false material declaration or makes or uses any other information, including any book, paper, document, record, recording, or other material, knowing the same to contain

PREDICATE ACT #4 MAIL FRAUD IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S. Code § 1341

 (1) having devised or intending to devise a scheme to defraud (or to perform specified fraudulent acts), and (

PREDICATE ACT #1 MAIL FRAUD IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S. Code § 1341

 (1) having devised or intending to devise a scheme to defraud (or to perform specified fraudulent acts), and (2) use of the mail for the purpose of executing, or attempting to execute, the scheme (or specified fraudulent acts).”

California law requires a landlord to enter the “total exact amount due in dollars and cents” which the below do

SCHEME TO DEFRAUD BOTH SHARON AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER, VIA ONE OR MORE MAIL FRAUD, WIRE FRAUD, EXTORTION UNDER THE COLOR OF OFFICIAL RIGHT, IN VIOLATION OF ONE OR MORE HOBBS ACT, 18 U.S.C. § 1951,

THE CRIMINAL ENTERPRIZE MADE A “INTENTIONAL FALSE COMMUNICATION VIA A STIPULATED JUDGMENT(CONTAINS MOST IF NOT ALL PROVISION WHICH VIOLATES U.S. HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT(HUD) POLICIES AND WHICH WAS NOT DUE PROCESS OF LAW)THE JUDGMENT WAS TO COERCE AND/OR THREATEN THE TWO WITNESSES TO GIVE MONEY THEY WERE NOT ENTITLED TO, IN EXCHANGE TO REMAIN IN THE HOUSING UNIT, IT WAS DONE WITH THE INTENT TO EXTORT MONEY OR TO THREATEN BOTH THE WITNESS, AND WAS DONE IN THE PUBLIC OFFICIALS OFFICIAL ACT.

THE CRIMINAL ENTERPI

• Communication;
• Threatening accusation of any crime or offense or any injury to the person or property or mother, father, husband, wife, or child of another,
• With intent to extort money or pecuniary advantage as to compel the person so threatened to do or refrain from doing an act against his/her will.

 “public official has obtained a payment to which he was not entitled, knowing that the payment was made in return for official acts.”

One or more knowingly, intentionally, gentionally abused the court

PREDICATE ACT #3 – 2007

PREDICATE ACT #4 – 2007

Whoever, having devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, transmits or causes to be transmitted by means of wire, radio, or television communication in interstate or foreign commerce, any writings, signs, signals, pictures, or sounds for the purpose of executing such scheme or artifice, 

NOTICE TO PAY RENT OR QUIT

DISCRIMINATION AGAINST THE TWO WITNESSES, FALSE INTENTIONAL MISRESPRESATION, WIRE FRAUD, MAIL FRAUD, ABUSE OF COURT, FALSE DECLARTIONS, EXTORTION UNDER THE COLOR OF OFFICAL RIGHT

THE PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY

#3

THE “INTERNATIONAL/TRANSNATIONAL “BIOTERRORIST PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE” ARE RELATED AND THEY AMOUNT TO OR PROSE A THREAT OF CONTINUED CRIMINAL ACTIVITY(THEY HAVE THE SAME OR SIMILAR PURPOSE, RESULTS, PARTICIPANTS, VICTIMS OR METHODS OF COMMISSION AND/OR ARE OTHERWISE INTERRELATED BY DISTINQUING CHARACTERISTIST AND ARE NOT ISOLATED EVENTS AS FOLLOWS: ARE AND ENGAGED IN A PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY WITHIN TEN YEARS OF EACH OTHER AS DEFINED IN 18 U.S.C.A. § 1961(5) ACTS OF RACKETEERING WITHIN TEN YEARS 18 U.S.C.A. § 1961(5)OF EACH OTHER ENGAGED INAS FOLLOWS:

“. The government must show that the racketeering predicates are related, and that they amount to or pose a threat of continued criminal activity. Id. Racketeering predicates are related if they have the same or similar purposes, results, participants, victims, or methods of commission, or otherwise are interrelated by distinguishing characteristics and are not isolated events. Id. at 240, 109 S. Ct. at 2901; Ticor Title Ins. Co. v. Florida, 937 F. 2d 447, 450 (9th Cir. 1991). Furthermore, the degree in which these factors establish a pattern may depend on the degree of proximity, or any similarities in goals or methodology, or the number of repetitions. United States v. Indelicato, 865 F. 2d 1370, 1382 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 811, 110 S. Ct. 56, 107 L. Ed. 2d 24 (1989).

Continuity refers either to a closed period of repeated conduct, or to past conduct that by its nature projects into the future with a threat of repetition. H.J., Inc., 492 U.S. at 241-42, 109 S. Ct. at 2902. A party alleging a RICO violation may demonstrate continuity over a closed period by proving a series of related predicates extending over a substantial period of time. Id. Predicate acts extending over a few weeks or months and threatening no future criminal conduct do not satisfy this requirement as Congress was concerned with RICO in long-term criminal conduct. Id.

ON OR ABOUT THAT RUSSIA, CHINA, “GLOBAL LEADERS” U.S. REPRESENTATIVES,” U.S. CONGRESSMAN,” ET AL ALL COME TO THE MEETING OT THE MIND TO WOMEN All came to the meeting to the mind, ratified, approved to exploit two witnesses, deny access to the court, commit fraud, more racketeering acts, to commit election  fraud, commence a factitious Russia Investigationfac·ti·tious NOTICE OF OFFICIAL COMPLAINT AND BY OPERATION OF LAW, AND BECAUSE ALL JUDGES DENIED BRIDGEWATER ACCESS TO COURT, IT IS ADJUDICATED THAT THIS OPERATES AS THE OFFICIAL COMPLAINT. KAMALA HARRIS(AN ASIAN AFRICAN AMERICAN)IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA(2004-2010)RECEIVED MULTIPLE CERTIFIED LETTERS FROM SHARON BRIDGEWATER ON OR ABOUT FROM 2004 AND CONTINUING THRU 2010TO PRESENT OF GOVERNMENT RACKETEERING AND INJURIES AND DAMAGES OF THE TWO WITNESSES HAD A LEGAL DUTY TO WITHDRAW FROM THE CONSPIRACY OR QUIT, BUT INSTEAD KNOWINGLY, INTENTIONALLY, ACTED UNDER THE COLOR OF LAW, ENTERED INTO AN ILLEGAL AGREEMENT WITH ONE OR MORE XI-JINPING, OBAMA, BIDEN, U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES AND/OR TRUMP ET AL SCHEME TO PROMOTE THE CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE, ADVANCE TO SENATOR, VICE PRESIDENT AND ULTIMATELY PRESIDENT “IN RECORD TIME” FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE TO TO DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES, ASSIST RUSSIA, CHINA, MARKET THE DEADLY COV-19 VACCINE – CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT GENOCIDE,ILLEGALLY, UNLAWFULLY UPURPS THE “OFFICE OF THE VICE PRESIDENT”

1. That the accused had specific intent to facilitate the commission of a crime by another;

2. That the accused had the requisite intent of the underlying substantive offense;

3. That the accused assisted or participated in the commission of the underlying substantive offense; and

4. That someone committed the underlying offense, RATIFIED, APPROVED TO PROMOTE AND ADVANCE THE CRIMINAL ENTEPRIZE TO DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES, ACCUMULATE REAL ESTATE TO JOIN THE LAW SUIT WITH DONALD TRUMP AND/OR TAKE HIS PLACE AS PRESIDENT TO DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES OUT OF TWO WITNESSES, CONSPIRED WITH U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES TO

NANCY PEOLOSI

GAVIN NEWSON

ALL KNEW AND WERE AWARE THE TWO WITNESSES NET WORTH, WAS TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS UPREME COURT JUSTICES, ETC. FOR THEIR ILLEGAL UNLAWFUL CONSPIRACY WITH CHINA AND RUSSIA)- RUSSIA, CHINA, BIDEN, ALL CAME TO THE MEETING OF THE MIND TO DISCRIMINATE AGAINST TWO WITNESSES, RUSSIA INVESTIGAN, CLINTON, E-MAIL, BIDEN FAMILY INVESTIGATION, FAKE IMPEACEMENT

IT IS A DISTRICT COURT JUDGE DUTY THAT IF “THE GOVERNMENT IS INVOLVED IN RACKETEERING ACTIVITY” HE OR SHE MUST REPORT IT “DIRECTLY TO THE UNITED STATES PRESIDENT”(45 CASES FOR MORE FILED IN ONE OR MORE THE DISTRICT COURTS FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, GEORGE AND/OR MICHIGAN

OBAMA-AIG

ILLEGALLY, UNLAWFULLY RECEIVED INCOME DERIVED, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY FROM A PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY OR THROUGH THE COLLECTION OF AN UNLAWFUL DEBT AN ONE OR MORE PERSON(S) PARTICIPATED AS A PRINCIPAL WITHIN THE MEANING OF SECTION 2, TITLE 18 U.S.C., USED AND/OR CONTINUE TO USE, INVESTED OR CONTINUE TO INVEST, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, PART OF INCOME OR THE PROCEED OF SUCH INCOME, OR THE PROCEEDS OF INCOME, IN ACQUISITION OF INTEREST IN, OR THE ESTABLISHMENT OR OPERATION OF “THE INTERNATIONAL-TRANSNATIONAL CRIMINAL PUBLIC/PRIVATE ENTERPRIZE”(ROTHCHILD AND/OR OBAMA ET WITH THE INTENT TO CONTROL OR PARTICIPATE IN THE CONTROL OF THE ISSUER AND/OR ASSISTED AND/OR CONTINUE TO ASSIST ANOTHER TO DO PURCHASE SECURITIES ON THE OPEN MARKET, PURCHASE SECURITIES ON THE OPEN MARKET FOR THE PURPOSE OF INVESTMENT – SEE BELOW ) WHICH IS ENGAGED IN, OR ACTIVITIES AFFECT AND CONTINUE TO AFFECT INTERSTATE AND/OR FORIEGN COMMERCE OR ONE OR MORE WHERE PERSON THROUGH A PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY OR COLLECTION OF AN UNLAWFUL DEBT ACQUIRED, MAINTAINED DIRECTLY AND/OR INDIRECTLY AND CONTINUE TO MAINTAIN DIRECTLY AND/OR INDIRECTLY INTEREST AND CONTROL OF AN ENTERPRISE ENGAGED IN OR ACTITIVES OF AFFECT, INTERSTATE OR FOREIGN COMMERCE, WERE EMPLOYED BY OR ASSOCIATED WITH “THE INTERNATIONAL/TRANSNATIONAL PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP CRIMINAL ENTERPRIZE” ENGAGED IN AND CONTINUE TO BE ENGAGED IN OR ACTIVIES AFFECTED AND CONTINUE TO EFFECT INTERSTATE OR FOREIGN COMMERCE(ILLEGAL UNLAWFUL GLOBAL LOCKDOWN VIA A “FRABRUCATED PLANDEMIC” – FALSE IMPRISONMENT, CREATING HOMELESSNESS FOR MILLIONS SEE BRIDGEWATER HOMELESSNESS FOR YEARS ON THIS WEBSITE) OR ACTIVITIES EFFECT AND CONTINUE TO EFFECT INTERSTATE AND/OR FOREIGN COMMERCE, CONDUCTED OR PARTICIPATED AND CONTINUE TO CONDUCT AND/OR PARTICIPATE DIRECTLY AND/OR DIRECTLY IN THE CONDUCT OF THE ENTERPRISE AFFAIRS THROUGH AND PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY ACTIVITY OR COLLECTION OF AN UNLAWFUL DEBT IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION(S)1962(a)(b)(c), AND CONSPIRE AND CONTINUE TO CONSPIRE TO VIOLATE THE ABOVE 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1962(a)(b)(c) in violation of 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1962(d).

IT IS A FEDERAL JUDGE DUTY TO INFORM THE U.S. PRESIDENT OF RACKETEERING, ONE OR ALL INFORMED OBAMA OF RACKETEERING. OBAMA AT THE TIME

OBAMA/ROTHCHIILD

IN ORDER TO PROVE MONEY LAUNDERING “THE UNITED STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR MUST PROVE BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT THE DEFENDANTS KNEW THAT THE MONEY THE PROCEEDS OF A FELONY!!

IT IS A DISTRICT COURT JUDGE DUTY THAT IF “THE GOVERNMENT IS INVOLVED IN RACKETEERING ACTIVITY” HE OR SHE MUST REPORT IT “DIRECTLY TO THE UNITED STATES PRESIDENT”

18 U.S. Code § 1344 – Bank fraud

• U.S. Code
• Notes

prev | next

Whoever knowingly executes, or attempts to execute, a scheme or artifice—

(1)

to defraud a financial institution; or

(2)

to obtain any of the moneys, funds, credits, assets, securities, or other property owned by, or under the custody or control of, a financial institution, by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises;

shall be fined not more than $1,000,000 or imprisoned not more than 30 years, or both.

(Added Pub. L. 98–473, title II, § 1108(a), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2147; amended Pub. L. 101–73, title IX, § 961(k), Aug. 9, 1989, 103 Stat. 500; Pub. L. 101–647, title XXV, § 2504(j), Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4861.)

1. The Defendant Knew the Money Involved was the Proceeds of a Felony

If you “laundered” money that you did not know came from the commission of a felony, they you have not committed money laundering. However, note that the prosecutor has a relatively low bar of proof they must meet. They only need to show that you knew it was illegally derived in some way – not that you knew specifically where it came from. They can use circumstantial evidence to prove this.

2. The Defendant Must Have Initiated or Concluded a Financial Transaction

A “financial transaction” is legally defined as a purchase, pledge, sale, loan, gift, withdrawal, exchange of currency, extension of credit, purchase or sale of a safe-deposit box, transfer between accounts, or any other type of payment or transfer or delivery to, through, or by a financial institution. The prosecutor must prove that you took part in either initiation or concluding one of these transactions.

3. That the Defendant Had One of Four Specific Intents

The prosecution is required to prove that the defendant was acting with at least one of these four intents:

• To promote the carrying on of a specific unlawful activity or;
• To engage in tax evasion / fraud; or
• To conceal proceeds of an unlawful activity; or
• To avoid transaction reporting requirements under state or federal law.

The international promotional offense, Section 1956(a)(2)(A), applies to anyone who:

1. A. transports, transmits, or transfers, or

B. attempts to transport, transmit, or transfer

2. a monetary instrument or funds

3. A. from a place in the U.S. to or through a place outside the U.S. or

B. to a place in the U.S. from or through a place outside the U.S.

4. with the intent to promote the carrying on of specified unlawful activity.⁴²

“Monetary instruments” is a term defined broadly to include cash, checks, securities, and the like.⁴³ Since Section 1952(a)(2)(A) proscribes both transportation and attempted transportation, prosecution may be had even though no funds were in fact transported internationally, as long as the government proves a substantial step towards international transportation.⁴⁴ The section does not demand that the transported funds flow from a predicate offense or from any other unlawful source; all that is required is that the offender intends to use them to promote a predicate offense.⁴⁵ Where the international promotional offense shares common elements with other Section 1956 offenses, they are comparably construed.⁴⁶ Thus, similar “intent to promote” elements impose the same requirements of proof upon the government regardless of whether the offense charged is a Section 1956(a)(1)(A)(i) financial transaction promotional offense or a Section 1956(a)(2)(A) international transfer promotional offense.⁴⁷ The statutory list of state, federal, and foreign predicate offenses (specified unlawful activities) applies to a Section 1956(a)(2)(A) offense as it does for all but one of the Section 1956 offenses.⁴⁸

MULTIPLE PREDICATE ACTS OF 18 U.S. Code § 1513 – Retaliating against a witness, victim, or an informant FROM 2008 THRU TO TODAY!!

BIDEN, OBAMA, HARRIS, FOREIGN OFFICIALS ARE ALL RESPONSIBLE!! ALL RETAILATED AGAINST THE TWO WITNESSES IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S. Code § 1513 knowingly, with the intent to retaliate, took actions harmful to both Sharon Bridgewater and/or James S. Bridgewater(“THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR”), including interference with the lawful employment or livelihood of both Sharon Bridgewater and/or James S. Bridgewater(“THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR”) for providing to Eric Holder in his official capacity as United States Attorney General, Kamala Harris in her official capacity as District Attorney for San Francisco, and other for truthful information relating to the commission or possible commission of any Federal offense, and RACKETEERING!!

THE OBAMA, BIDEN, GARLAND ET AL “SUB – TEAM”

All knowingly engages in any conduct and thereby causes bodily injury to both Sharon Bridgewater and/or James S. Bridgewater(“THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR”) or damaged and/or continues to damage the tangible property of both Sharon Bridgewater and/or James S. Bridgewater(“THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR”), or threatens to do so, with intent to retaliate against any person for—

NANCY PEOLOSI but retained her role as leader of the House Democratic Caucus and returned to the role of House minority leader. In the 2018 midterm elections, the Democrats regained control of the House.^[1] When the 116th Congress convened on January 3, 2019, Pelosi was again elected Speaker,^[2] becoming the first former Speaker to return to the post since Sam Rayburn in 1955.Under Pelosi’s leadership, the House of Representatives impeached President Donald Trump, first on December 18, 2019, and again on January 13, 2021; Trump was acquitted both times by the Senate.ACTS OF BIDEN, HARRIS, OBAMA, HOLDER, TRUMP RETAILATION AND FOREIGN OFFICIALS Sharon Bridgewater and/or James S. Bridgewater(“THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR”)

-CLICK HERE- FOR YEARS OF RETAILATION!!

All knowingly engaged and continue to engage in conduct and thereby causes bodily injury to both Sharon Bridgewater and/or James S. Bridgewater(“THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR”) or damaged and/or continues to damage the tangible property of both Sharon Bridgewater and/or James S. Bridgewater(“THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR”), or threatens to do so, with intent to retaliate against any person for—

(1)

the attendance of a witness or party at an official proceeding, or any testimony given or any record, document, or other object produced by a witness in an official proceeding; or

(2)

for information relating to the commission or possible commission of a Federal offense or a violation of conditions of probation, supervised release, parole, or release pending judicial proceedings given by a person to a law enforcement officer; and for exercising legal right and filing 45 plus cases in federal or district court and continue to do so or attempts to do so,

THE LAW PROVIDES FOR fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.

(c)

If the retaliation occurred because of attendance at or testimony in a criminal case, the maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed for the offense under this section shall be the higher of that otherwise provided by law or the maximum term that could have been imposed for any offense charged in such case.

(d)

There is extraterritorial Federal jurisdiction over “all foreign official” for this offense under this section.

(e)

Whoever knowingly, with the intent to retaliate, takes any action harmful to any person, including interference with the lawful employment or livelihood of any person, for providing to a law enforcement officer any truthful information relating to the commission or possible commission of any Federal offense, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both.

(f)

Whoever conspires to commit any offense under this section shall be subject to the same penalties as those prescribed for the offense the commission of which was the object of the conspiracy.

EXTRATERRORIAL JURISDICITION

OBAMA

2021

2012 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS

OBAMA, HOLDER, ETC. ASSAULT, BATTERY(ONE OR MORE SPINAL CORD INJURES, NECK INJURIES, KIDNAP, FALSE IMPRISIONMENT “THE 50 UNITED STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR” VIOLATED 18 U.S. Code § 241 

Of two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or

If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured—

They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill,

JUNE 13, 2013

U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES UNANIMOUSLY AND BY VACCINATING WITH MODIFIED DNA OR RNA, A PERSON CEASES TO BE A HUMAN AND BECOMES PROPERTY OF THE PANTENTEE OF THE mRNA “INJECTION,” BECAUSE THEIR GENOME IS NO LONGER HUMAN BUT “TRANS-HUMAN” THE CHARACTERISTIC OF THE NATURAL MAN AND ALL RIGHTS THAT RESULT FROM THEM ARE LOST(HUMAN RIGHTS AND/OR U.S. CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS), AND APPLIES TO THE WHOLE COUNTRY AND/OR “ALL COUNTRIES!!”

as follows:

https://www.genomeweb.com/diagnostics/us-supreme-court-strikes-down-gene-patents-allows-patenting-synthetic-dna#.YowHLqDMLcs

FIVE DAYS LATER!!

JUNE 18, 2013

JOE BIDEN IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS VICE PRESIDENT, K. HARRIS IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA CAME TO THE MEETING OF THE MIND, ENTERED INTO AN UNLAWFUL AGREEMENT CONSPIRACY WITH U.S. SUPREME COURT, TO CONCEAL KNOWN FACTS THEY WERE UNDER A DUTY TO DISCLOSE, ACT IN JOINT PARTICIPATION WITH U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, OBAMA, HOLDER AND FOREIGN OFFICIALS TO UPURP OFFICE, CONTINUE TO DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES TO FUND THE “DEATH INJECTION” GLOBALLY, MARKET THE CONSPIRACY TO UPURP PUBLIC OFFICE, CAUSE A “PLANDEMIC” MARKET THE COV-19 DEATH INJECTION TO THE TWO WITNESSES AND DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESS FRAUD ON THE COURT

PREDICATE ACT #

BIDEN, HARRIS, OBAMA, HOLDER U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES ET AL concealed known facts from Sharon and/or James S. Bridgewater they were under a duty to disclose, secretly, deceitfully  knowingly, intentionally devised or intended to devise a scheme to defraud (the two witnesses and victims of Government official acting in their individual capacities, under the color of law engaged in racketeering activity)use of the mail for the purpose of executing, or attempting to execute, the scheme (or specified fraudulent acts)scheme or artifice to deprive another of the intangible right of honest services in violatIon of USC section 18 U.S. Code § 1346 or in violation of 18 USC SECTION(S) 1343 AND/OR 1341 devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, transmits or causes to be transmitted by means of wire, radio, or television communication in interstate or foreign commerce, any writings, signs, signals, pictures, or sounds for the purpose of executing such scheme or artifice, devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, transmits or causes to be transmitted by means of wire, radio, or television communication in interstate or foreign commerce, any writings, signs, signals, pictures, or sounds for the purpose of executing such scheme or artifice, in violation of 18 usc section 1343  (1) a scheme to defraud, and (2) the mailing of a letter, etc., for the purpose of executing the scheme.”)) that the defendant voluntarily and intentionally devised or participated in a scheme to defraud the two witness out of money; (2) that the defendant did so with the intent to defraud; (3) that it was reasonably foreseeable that interstate wire communications would be used; and (4) that interstate wire communications were in fact used)WITH THE INTENT TO DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES OF 125 TRILLION AND/OR EXPLOIT TWO WITNESSES TO FUND AND/OR MARKET THE “DEADLY COV-19 INJECTION MRNA INJECTION TO ENSLAVE AND MAKE HUMANITY SOMEONE ELSE PROPERTY

DEFENDANTS IN THIS CASE “INTERVENED AS ENJOINED FILER REVIEW AS PLAINTIFFS”)

SEE THE SIX CASE FROM THE TOP ENTITLED BRIDGEWATER VS. ERIC HOLDER 2:13-CV-12692 AS FOLLOWS:

P

PREDICATE ACT #

SEPTEMBER 13, 2013

CASE #12-1332 – IN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT OF COLUMBIA – WASHINGTON, D.C.

COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM, UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES v. LYNCH(MEMORANUDUM AND ORDER SIGNED BY JUDGE AMY BERMAN JACKSON – SEE SHARON BRIDGEWATER MOVANT-2ND PAGE, 2ND NAME FROM BOTTOM – SHARON BRIDGEWATER MOVING PARTY) WIRE FRAUD IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION

IN FURTHERANCE OF THE UNLAWFUL CONCY COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM, UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES v. LYNCH(MEMORANUDUM AND ORDER SIGNED BY JUDGE AMY BERMAN JACKSON – SEE SHARON BRIDGEWATER MOVANT-2ND PAGE, 2ND NAME FROM BOTTOM – SHARON BRIDGEWATER MOVING PARTY) WIRE FRAUD IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION

VACCINATING WITH MODIFIED DNA OR RNA, A PERSON CEASES TO BE A HUMAN AND BECOMES PROPERTY OF THE PANTENTEE OF THE mRNA “INJECTION,” BECAUSE THEIR GENOME IS NO LONGER HUMAN BUT “TRANS-HUMAN” THE CHARACTERISTIC OF THE NATURAL MAN AND ALL RIGHTS THAT RESULT FROM THEM ARE LOST(HUMAN RIGHTS AND/OR U.S. CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS), AND APPLIES TO THE WHOLE COUNTRY AND/OR “ALL COUNTRIES!!”ACTS OR OMISSIONS CONSTITUTE CONSPIRING WITH OBAMA TO ENGAGE IN A PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTITY CAME TO THE MEETING OF THE MIND, ENTERED INTO AN UNLAWFUL AGREEMENT WITH ONE OR MORE U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICE, BARAK H. OBAMA IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS PRESIDENT, ERIC HOLDER IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, KAMALA HARRIS IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR SAN FRANISCO, DONALD TRUMP IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS BUSINESS MAN, HILLARY CLINTON IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY, U.S. SUPREME COURT JUDGES, MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS JUDGE FOR D.C. CIRCUIT, FOREIGN OFFICIALS, COMMIT CRIMINAL ACTS AGAINST THE WITNESSES TO RETAILIATE AGAINST BOTH SHARON AND JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S. Code § 1513, EXPLOIT TWO WITNESSES, DEFRAUD BOTH JAMES AND SHARON OUT OF MONEY AND/OR PROPERTY(125 TRILLION) COMMIT CRIMINAL ACTS AGAINST THE TWO WITNESSES, AND JOE BIDEN(INCLUDING HARRIS, OBAMA, ERIC HOLDER LOST THEIR REPRESENTATIVE CAPACITY) WHEN THEY COMMITTED THIS CRIMINAL ACT AND ILLEGALLY, UNLAWFULLY UPURP “THEIR PUBLIC OFFICES BY FORCE AND WITHOUT THE RIGHT!” DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AND RETRO-ACTIVE IMPEACHMENT OF BIDEN, HARRIS ET AL!! DECLARATORY JUDGMENT THAT ALL JOE BIDEN EXECUTIVE ORDERS, OBAMA EXECUTIVE ORDER, SUPREME COURT JUSTICE EXECUTIVE ORDERS ARE NULL AND VOID AND WITHOUT ANY LEGAL EFFECT!

THE SHAM RUSSIA INVESTIGATION, SHAM CLINTON E-MAIL SCANDAL, SHAM BIDEN FAMILY INVESTIGATION INCLUDING HUNTER BIDEN LAPTOP E-MAIL SHAM -ELECTION FRAUD!!

SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, ETC. CONCEALED KNOWN FACTS THEY WERE UNDER A DUTY TO DISCLOSE TO THE TWO WITNESSES, EXPFOR THEIR ILLEGAL UNLAWFUL CONSPIRACY WITH CHINA AND RUSSIA)- RUSSIA, CHINA, BIDEN, ALL CAME TO THE MEETING OF THE MIND TO DISCRIMINATE AGAINST TWO WITNESSES, TO ABUSE THE COURT, APPOINT AN EMPLOYEE OF THE U.S. GOVERNMENT THEIR OWN SPECIAL PROSECUTOR “SHAM RUSSIA INVESTIGATION AND/OR SHAM “THE BIDEN FAMILY INVESTIGATION VIA HILLARY CLINTON E-MAIL SCANDAL AND HUNTER BIDEN LAPTOP-EMAIL SCANDAL (ROBERT MUELLER AND/OR JOHN DURHAM) IN FURTHERANCE OF THE SCHEME TO DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES, FRAUD ON THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ONE OR MORE V. PUTIN, TRUMP, OBAMA, H. CLINTON, ET AL OBAMA HIRES HIS OWN FBI DIRECTOR ROBERT MUELLER AS SPECIAL COUNSEL FOR RUSSIA INVESTIGATION

IN FURTHERANCE OF THE UNLAWFUL CONSPIRACY WILLIAM BARR, DONALD TRUMP, MERRICK GARLAND HIRES THEIR CRIMINAL PARTNER JOHN DURHAM TO DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES AS FOLLOWS

IMPEACHMENT OF DONALD TRUMP AND/OR JOE BIDEN FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE TO EXPLOIT THE TWO WITNESSES, OBTAIN A 125 TRILLION JUDGMENT(UNDER SEAL) AND DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES(PEOLSI, U.S. SENATORS AND U.S. CONGRESSMAN ALIKE VOTED TO HAVE IMPEACMENT HEARINGS FAILED TO IMPEACH TRUMP AS PRESIDENT AND/OR BIDEN AND ARE EQUALLY LIABLE FOR TREASON,

TO PRESENT OF GOVERNMENT RACKETEERING AND INJURIES AND DAMAGES OF THE TWO WITNESSES KNOWINGLY, INTENTIONALLY, ACTED UNDER THE COLOR OF LAW, ENTERED INTO AN ILLEGAL AGREEMENT WITH ONE OR MORE XI-JINPING, OBAMA, BIDEN, U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES AND/OR TRUMP ET AL SCHEME TO PROMOTE THE CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES. ILLEGALLY, UNLAWFULLY UPURPS THE “OFFICE OF THE VICE PRESIDENT”

18 U.S.C. Section 241 of the federal criminal code’ makes it a felony for
two or more persons to “conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or
intimidate any citizen in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right
or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United
States ….

MILLIONS IF NOT BILLIONS OF PEOPLE DENIED THE FREE EXERCISE OR ENJOYMENT OF THE RIGHT TO VOTE, AS DEFINED IN Section 18 U.S.C. SECTION 241 of the federal criminal code’ makes it a felony for two or more persons to “conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or
intimidate any citizen in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right
or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United
States ….

THE CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION KNOWINGLY, INTENTIONALLY VIOLATED MILLIONS OF U.S. CITIZENS CIVIL RIGHTS IN A SCHEME TO PLACE DONALD TRUMP A “REAL ESTATE TYCOON” TO OBTAIN A JUDGMENT FOR 125 TRILLION TO DERAUD “THE UNITED STATES AND/OR IT’S AGENCY VIA EXPLOITATION OF AND SCHEME TO DEFRAUD “TWO MINORITY AFRICAN AMERICA REAL ESTATE BUSINESS OWNERS(ONE OR BOTH CALIFORNIA REAL ESTATE BROKER AND/OR BUSINESS OWNERS)!!

THE CONSTITUTIONAL SCOPE OF THE RIGHT TO VOTE AND TO BE FREE
OF VOTE FRAUD!! (MILLIONS OF PEOPLE U.S. CONSTITUTIONAL CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATED AS DEFINED IN 18 U.S.C. SECTION 241 BY “TREASONOUS” FRAUDSTERS DONALD TRUMP, HILLARY CLINTON, RUSSIA/CHINA CO-CONSPIRATORS TO DEFRAUD TWO WITNESSES)

2016

PREDICATE ACT#

ONE OR MORE SESSION, LYNCH, HOLDER, GARLAND, KETANJI BROWN JACKSON KNOWINGLY, INTENTIONALLY, CONSPIRED AND CONTINUES TO CONSPIRE WITH ONE OR MORE CLERK OF THE COURT, BIDEN, HARRIS, OBAMA, HOLDER, MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS D.C. CIRCUIT, ONE OR MORE Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell, District Judge Amy Berman Jackson, Senior Judge Thomas F. Hogan, Senior Judge Royce C. Lamberth, Senior Judge Paul L. Friedman, Senior Judge Emmet G. Sullivan, Senior Judge Reggie B. Walton, Senior Judge John D. Bates, Senior Judge Richard J. Leon, Senior Judge Barbara J. Rothstein, KETANJI BROWN JACKSON IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITES AS U.S. FEDERAL JUDGE FOR THE D.C. CIRCUIT AND/OR U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE D.C. CIRCUIT ALL CAME TO THE MEETING OF THE MINDS, ENTERED INTO AN ULAWFUL AGREEMENT WITH WILLIAM BARR, DONALD TRUMP ET AL TO CONCEAL KNOWN FACTS UNDER A DUTY TO DISCLOSE, COMMIT FRAUD ON THE COURT, ISSUE ONE OR MORE “VOID JUDGMENT WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW,” DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES AS FOLLOWS  voluntarily and intentionally devised or participated in a scheme to defraud THE TWO WITNESSES out of money WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW; AND DID SO WITH THE intent to defraud AND KNEW THAT interstate wire communications would be used; and DID IN FACT USE interstate wire communications were in fact used- WIRE FRAUD BY ISSUING ONE OR MORE OPINIONS AS FOLLOWS AND/OR ISSUING ONE OR MORE JUDGMENT AND/OR ORDER ENTITLED BIDEN VS. TEXAS(CONSOLIDATED WITH ONE OR MORE SHARON BRIDGEWATER VS. DONALD TRUMP ETC. – FRAUD ON COURT ETC.)IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1343 AS FOLLOWS:

KNEW AND WERE AWARE THAT THERE WAS A V. LITIGANT ORDER, AND WITH THE INTENT TO DEFRAUD, ACCEPT $350.00 AND/OR $450.00 FOR FILING FEE, KNOWING THEY WERE GOING TO DISMISS THE LAW SUIT AND DEFRAUD BRIDGEWATER AND CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD OUT OF MONEY AND/OR PROPERTY WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAWvoluntarily and intentionally devised or participated in a scheme to defraud THE TWO WITNESSES out of money WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW; AND DID SO WITH THE intent to defraud AND KNEW THAT interstate wire communications would be used; and DID IN FACT USE interstate wire communications were in fact used- WIRE FRAUD BY ISSUING ONE OR MORE OPINIONS AS FOLLOWS AND/OR ISSUING ONE OR MORE JUDGMENTS VIA U.S. DISTRICT COURT OF COLUMBIA CASE ENTITLED SHARON BRIDGEWATER VS. LORETTA LYNCH 2017 – 1:2017cv00169 – DISMISSED BRIDGEWATER ADMIRALTY AND/OR MARTIME CLAIM AS FOLLOWS:

Reggie B. Walton
Nature of Suit:	Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1333
Jury Demanded By:	None

PREDICATE ACT

TRUMP DECLARE – Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas at the White House in May 2017, President Trump boasted of the ease with which he would achieve the Israeli-Palestinian peace

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/09/15/trump-abraham-accords-palestinians-peace-deal-415083

TRUMP AND BIDEN’S ABRAHAM ACCORD IS NULL AND VOID AND WITHOUT ANY LEGAL EFFECT!!

THIS CASE U.S. DISTRICT COURT ADMIRALTY AND/OR MARITIME CLAIMS) VIA U.S. DISTRICT COURT OF COLUMBIA CASE ENTITLED SHARON BRIDGEWATER VS. LORETTA LYNCH 2017 – 1:2017cv00169(THE CASE WAS COMMENCED ON OR ABOUT JAN. 2017 APPROX. THE TIME OF ELECTIONS VIA AT THE ENDING OF OBAMA TERM AND THE BEGINNING OF DONALD TRUMP TERM-MAKING DONALD TRUMP AND HIS ADMINSTRATION – WILLIAM BARR, ET AL DEFENDANTS AND/OR RESPONDANTS IN THIS CASE(THE REASON WHY THE CASE IS ENTITLED SHARON BRIDGEWATER VS. LORETTA LYNCH!!)

Reggie B. Walton
Nature of Suit:	Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1333
Jury Demanded By:	None

DECLARATORY JUDGMENT(“THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR VS. MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL) ARREST WARRANTS FOR MERRICK GARLAND(AND ALL THOSE OPERATING UNDER HIS DIRECTION!!

MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS CHIEF THE FRAUDSTER(AND RACKETEERING CO-CONSPIRATOR)

SHARON BRIDGEWATER HAVE BEEN DIRECTLY INJURED BY MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS CHIEF JUDGE FOR THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS(DONALD TRUMP, WILLIAM BARR) D.C. CIRCUIT BY ONE OR MORE FELONIOUS CRIMES AND/OR RACKETEERING CRIMES OF MAIL FRAUD, CONCEALMENT, FRAUD, AGGRAVATED IDENTITY THEFT, FORGERY, ILLEGAL USE OF MY NAME WITHOUT MY AUTHORIZATION AND/OR RIGHT(EXPLOITATION OF AN
DISABLED INDIVIDUAL DUE TO VIOLENCE AND U.S. GOV. ATTACKS, ASSAULT, BATTERY ETC) IN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT COURT OF APPEALS https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/cadc/19-1141

CONVICTION AND NOTICE OF RETRO-ACTIVE IMPEACHMENT FOR CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD OUT OF MONEY AND/OR PROPERTY WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW(ADMIRALTY AND/OR MARITIME CLAIMS) VIA U.S. DISTRICT COURT OF COLUMBIA CASE ENTITLED SHARON BRIDGEWATER VS. LORETTA LYNCH 2017 – 1:2017cv00169

MERRICK GARLAND CURRENTLY UPSURPS THE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL WITHOUT THE RIGHT AND HIS IS DIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSPIRING WITH D. TRUMP IN THE CAPITOL ATTACKS ON JAN. 6, 2021.(COMMITTED FRAUD IN THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, ILLEGALLY, UNLAWFULLY, USED MY NAME SHARON BRIDGEWATER WITHOUT THE RIGHT AND AUTHORIZATION, CONSPIRED WITH DONALD TRUMP AND WILLIAM BARR, AND U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES TO OBTAIN MONEY AND/OR PROPERTY WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW, THAT BELONGS TO THE TWO WITNESSES!!

IN ADDITION U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES UNANIMOUSLY AND BY VACCINATING WITH MODIFIED DNA OR RNA, A PERSON CEASES TO BE A HUMAN AND BECOMES PROPERTY OF THE PANTENTEE OF THE mRNA “INJECTION,” BECAUSE THEIR GENOME IS NO LONGER HUMAN BUT “TRANS-HUMAN” THE CHARACTERISTIC OF THE NATURAL MAN AND ALL RIGHTS THAT RESULT FROM THEM ARE LOST(HUMAN RIGHTS AND/OR U.S. CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS), AND APPLIES TO THE WHOLE COUNTRY AND/OR “ALL COUNTRIES!!”(visiting)ADOPTED THE ACTS OF ONE OR MORE JACOB ROTHCHILD[OWNER AND CONTROLLER OF WORLD BANKS-MONEY LAUNDERING, ETC.], OBAMA, ENGAGED IN A PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY, DEVISED A SCHEME WITH ONE OR MORE DONALD TRUMP, JOE BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS ET AL TO DEFRAUD BOTH SHARON BRIDGEWATER AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER FOR OBTAINING MONEY OR PROPERTY BY MEANS OF FALSE, FRAUDULANT PRETENSES, REPRESENTATIONS, AND TRANSMITS OR CAUSES TO BE TRANSMITTED BY MEANS OF WIRE, RADIO, TELEVISION COMMUNICATION IN INTERSTATE OR FOREIGN COMMERCE, ONE WRITING, SIGNS, SIGNALS, PICTURES OR SOUNDS FOR EXECUTING THE SCHEME OR TO ARTIFICE, IN U.S CONTINUES TO COMMIT CRIMINAL ACTS, OF WIRE FRAUD IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. 1343 IN CASE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY,
ET AL., PETITIONERS
v.
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI
BEFORE JUDGMENT TO THE UNITED STATES
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI
BEFORE JUDGMENT

ISSUE AND/OR MADE OPINIONS OF TWO OR MORE RULING WITHOUT HAVING JURISDICTION

AS FOLLOW

https://www.msnbc.com/all-in/watch/the-supreme-court-ruling-experts-are-calling-stunning-radical-and-terrifying-119465029722

SUBSEQUENTLY TOOK THE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE SOLE PURPOSES TO COLLECT EXTORT “MONEY” FROM OTHERS BASED ON HIS OWN FRAUDULENT JUDGMENT IN THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS IN A SCHEME TO DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES CURRENTLY CONSPIRES WITH BIDEN, HARRIS & FOREIGN OFFICIALS, ALL CONSPIRED TO “MAKE HUMANITY – NON HUMAN VIA TO ENSLAVE ONE OR BOTH WITNESSES & HUMANITY

THAT MERRICK GARLAND IS GUILTY OF TREASON, RACKETEEERING CONSPIRACY, WIRE FRAUD, MAIL FRAUD, AGGREIVATED IDENTITY THEFT, AND A HOST OF OTHER CRIMES AND IS INELIGIBLE TO HOLD OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT AND IS “IMPEACHED/REMOVED FROM THE OFFICE OF THE U.S. PRESIDENT” SEE BELOW IMPEACHMENT.MER

DECLARATORY JUDGMENT(“THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR VS. MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL) ARREST WARRANTS FOR MERRICK GARLAND(AND ALL THOSE OPERATING UNDER HIS DIRECTION!!

MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS CHIEF THE FRAUDSTER(AND RACKETEERING CO-CONSPIRATOR)

SHARON BRIDGEWATER HAVE BEEN DIRECTLY INJURED BY MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS CHIEF JUDGE FOR THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS(DONALD TRUMP, WILLIAM BARR) D.C. CIRCUIT BY ONE OR MORE FELONIOUS CRIMES AND/OR RACKETEERING CRIMES OF MAIL FRAUD, CONCEALMENT, FRAUD, AGGRAVATED IDENTITY THEFT, FORGERY, ILLEGAL USE OF MY NAME WITHOUT MY AUTHORIZATION AND/OR RIGHT(EXPLOITATION OF AN
DISABLED INDIVIDUAL DUE TO VIOLENCE AND U.S. GOV. ATTACKS, ASSAULT, BATTERY ETC) IN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT COURT OF APPEALS https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/cadc/19-1141 MERRICK GARLAND CURRENTLY UPSURPS THE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL WITHOUT THE RIGHT AND HIS IS DIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSPIRING WITH D. TRUMP IN THE CAPITOL ATTACKS ON JAN. 6, 2021.

https://wwmt.com/news/state/resolve-this-gov-whitmer-calls-on-canadian-government-to-reopen-ambassador-bridge

2020

THE

THE DEADLY VIRUS OR BACTERIA, CORONAVIRUS UNLEASHED ON HUMANITY BY ONE OR MORE FAUCI, XI JINPING, TRUMP CORONAVIRUS ON OR ABOUT THE CHINESE NEW YEAR, THE YEAR OF THE RAT!! TIMELINE OF CORONAVIRUS

ALL HAD LEGAL DUTIES TO CONVICT TRUMP FOR HIS FELONIOUS CRIMINAL ACTS AND FAILED TO AND ALL ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CAPITOL ATTACKS, AIDING, ABETTING TRUMP TO DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESS AND ARE !!

FEBRUARY 2020 – 1ST TRUMP ACQUITTAL!!

FEBRUARY 2020 – 1ST TRUMP ACQUITTAL!!

SCHEME TO DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES BY CONSOLIDATING LAWSUIT(BIDEN AND TRUMP IMPEACHMENT – RETRO-ACTIVE IMPEACHMENT OF TRUMP AND IMPEACHING BIDEN,

BIDEN SWORN IN ON JAN. 20, 2021

AND THE ONE DAY LATER, ON JAN.21, 2021 BIDEN IMPEACHED AND/OR ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT INTRODUCED WITHOUT BIDEN HAVING “ACTED” ON OR ABOUT 1ST DAY OF OFFICE AS PRESIDENT AS FOLLOWS:

DONALD TRUMP IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS PRESIDENT(RECEIVED IN THE U.S. SENATE ON JAN. 25, 2021 ONLY THREE DAY(3)DAY LATER AFTER BIDEN ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT, DONALD TRUMP IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY IS IMPEACHED “AGAIN” A SECOND TIME, “RETRO-ACTIVELY” AS FOLLOWS:

JAN. 22, 2021 KAMALA HARRIS “SUDDENLY” ACCUMULATES REAL ESTATES JOINS THE LAWSUIT WITH BIDEN AND TRUMP TO PROMOTE PROMOTE THE CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE IN FURTHERANCE OF A SCHEME TO DEFRAUD TWO WITNESSES AND/OR SHE

FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE TO CONSOLIDATE LAWSUIT(S) WITH BIDEN AND/OR KAMALA HARRIS “UNDER SEAL” TO DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES “SECOND” TIME – WIRE MAIL FRAUD

FEBRUARY 13, 2021 – 2ND TRUMP ACQUITTAL!!

MARCH 11, 2021

IN FURTHERANCE OF THE UNLAWFUL CONSPIRACY KAMALA HARRIS SWEARS IN CRIMINAL “TAG-TEAM PARTNER” MERRICK GARLAND(GARLAND ADVANCED AND PROMOTED “FROM THE CRIMINAL ENTEPRISE – AFTER ILLEGALLY, UNLAWFULLY USING MY NAME -SHARON BRIDGEWATER WITHOUT THE RIGHT AND WITHOUT CONSENT, MAIL FRAUD AND/OR WIRE FRAUD, FRAUD ON THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS D.C. CIRCUIT, AFTER HE AIDED, ABETTED AND/OR CONSPIRACY WITH DONALD TRUMP IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS PRESIDENT AND/OR INDIVIDUALLY AND/OR WILLIAM BARR IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS PRESIDETN TO DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES IN AN “EFFORT” TO COLLECT MONEY AND/OR PROPERTY WITHOUT DUE PROCESS BASED ON HIS OWN FRAUD IN U.S. COURT OF APPEALS D.C. CIRCUIT IN

GARLAND IS GUILTY OF TREASON AND SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY, AND CLICK HERE FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AND ARREST WARRANT FOR MERRICK GARLAND “LITERALLY” FOR HIS ILLEGAL(FELONIOUS CRIMINAL ACTS) COMMITTED AGAINST MY BUSINESS, PERSON AND/OR PROPERTY!!

FEBRUARY 25, 2022

BIDEN AND GARLAND WITH THE INTENT TO COMMIT MAIL FRAUD, WIRE FRAUD AND/OR ONE OR MORE PREDICATE ACTS AS DEFINED IN 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1961(1) NOMINATES CRIMINAL PARTNER K.B. JACKSON(WHO COMMITTED FRAUD ON THE COURT, ILLEGALLY, UNLAWFULLY COMMITTED IDENTITY THEFT, USED MY NAME SHARON BRIDGEWATER, EXPLOITATION, ILLEGALLY, ISSUED ONE OR MORE “NULL AND VOID” JUDGMENTS IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AND/OR U.S. COURT OF APPEALS D.C. CIRCUIT AS FOLLOWS:

“THE FAKE SUPREME COURT SELECTION PROCESS AS FOLLOWS:

ON OR ABOUT MARCH 3, 2022

“THE 50 UNITED STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR” WARNS, INFORM K.B.JACKSON OF THE RACKETEEERING CONSPIRACY, AND/OR OTHER UNLAWFUL ACTS AS FOLLOWS: – CLICK ON CERTIFIED MAIL AND/OR PROOF OF SERVICE ON THE FOLLOWING WEBPAGE:

https://www.thefinalexodus.com/k-b-jackson-racketeering-conspiracy

K.J. BROWN HAD A LEGAL DUTY TO WITHDRAW FROM THE CONSPIRACY, QUIT HER JOB AND FIND OTHER EMPLOYMENT ETC.

ON OR ABOUT APRIL 2, 2022

KAMALA HARRIS(“INELIGIBLE TO HOLD PUBLIC OFFICE AS SENATOR AND/OR VICE PRESIDENT FOR HER ILLEGAL, UNLAWFUL ACTS OR OMISSIONS AGAINST THE TWO WITNESSES IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA, ILLEGALLY UPSURPS THE PUBLIC OFFICE AS VICE PRESIDENT ONE OR MORE OF HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS VICE PRESIDENT)HOLD THE CONFIRMATION HEARING FOR K.J. BROWN – (K.J. JACKSON CONSPIRED WITH MERRICK GARLAND, OTHER U.S. FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT JUDGES TO DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES OF MONEY AND/OR PROPERTY-SEE ABOVE) SUPREME COURT JUSTICES

“THE 50 UNITED STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR” VIA CERTIFIED MAIL, SEND K.J. BROWN IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY NOTICE OF U.S. GOVERNMENT RACKETEERING ETC. AS FOLLOWS:

BIDEN ILLEGAL, UNLAWFULLY CONSPIRE TO INITIATE A “SECOND” PANDEMIC(TO LOCK-DOWN YOU AND I AGAIN TO PREVENT “THE UNITED STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL FROM ARRESTING BIDEN, HARRIS, U.S. SENATORS, ETC. FOR THEIR ILLEGAL, CRIMINAL ACTS OF GENOCIDE ON THE POPULATION) AND WE ARE NOT OUT OF “THE FIRST “FAKE PANDEMIC”!!

https://www.newsweek.com/joe-biden-second-pandemic-viral-video-coronavirus-covid-disease-speech-1717927

Sharon Bridgewater and/or James S. Bridgewater(“THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR”)

AND “THE 50 STATES REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE THAT ON OR ABOUT JAN. 1, 2009 AND CONTINUING THRU TO 2017 JOE BIDEN IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS VICE PRESIDENT(PRIMARY AUTHOR OF THE VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN’S ACT – WHICH PROVIDES FOR THE INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION OF VIOLENT CRIMES AGAINST WOMEN, IMPOSE AUTOMATIC AND MANDATORY RESTITUTION ON THOSE CONVICTED AND ALL CIVIL REDRESS WHEN PROSECUTORS CHOSE TO NOT PROSECUTE CASES) RECEIVED ON OR MORE CERTIFIED MAILS ABOUT THE CRIMINAL ACTS THE GOVT. COMMITTED AGAINST “OUR” BUSINESS, PERSON OR PROPERTY, FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO 2017 HAD A LEGAL DUTY TO ACT(AND DID NOTHING-IGNORED BRIDGEWATER)HIS(AND/OR KAMALA HARRIS)

ON OR ABOUT JUNE 15, 2022 “THE UNITED STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR” “REPRESENTATIVE OF YESHUA/JESUS CHRIST AND/OR THE TWELVE TRIBES OF ISRAEL” “A CHRISTIAN WHO LOVES GOD IN HEAVEN FAITHFULLY” POSTED ON THIS WEBSITE ARREST WARRANTS OF BIDEN, U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, U.S. LEGISLATORS ETC.

“THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR VS. ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES(U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, KNEW AND WERE AWARE THAT “THE UNITED STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR” WAS GOING PUBLIC WITH WARRANTS FOR ARREST, CRIMINAL CHARGES FOR RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY, KNEW THAT THEIR ASSETS WERE SUBJECT TO FORFEITURE AND WERE RETRO-ACTIVITY IMPEACHED KNEW AND WERE AWARE SHARON BRIDGEWATER HAD TWO OR MORE ABORTIONS, WAS A VICTIM OF RAPE BY FRAUD AND/OR VIOLENCE TWO OR MORE TIMES, A UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN GRADUATE – WOMEN’S STUDY MAJOR, WHICH CONCERNS WOMEN’S ISSUES AND RIGHTS SUCH AS ABORTION RIGHTS, THE RIGHT TO CHOOSE, AND MAKE DECISIONS ABOUT THEIR OWN BODY VIA AN ABORTION RATHER IT BE FOR HEALTH REASONS, RAPE, INCESTS, RELIGION REASON ETC.,ON OR ABOUT 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU PRESENT U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICE, BIDEN, OBAMA, HARRIS(SATAN AND HIS AGENTS U.S. REPRESENTIVES,- BIDEN, HARRIS, ETC. – JOB IS TO ACCUSE AND SLANDER PEOPLE BEFORE THE PRESENCE OF GOD DAY AND NIGHT), “THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE, UNJUSTIFIABLY INTRUDED MY PERSONAL LIFE OF “THE UNITED STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR PERSONAL LIFE, WITHOUT CONSENT AND/OR RIGHT(INVASION OF PRIVACY) AND KNOWINGLY, INTENTIONALLY REVERSED ROWE V. WADE FOR TWO REASONS;

1) TO RETALIATE, LIBEL(PUBLISH A STATEMENT, OVERTURNING “50 YEARS OF WOMEN RIGHTS TO ABORTION” 31 MILLION AMERICANS EFFECTED- TENDING TO EXPOSE BRIDGEWATER TO PUBLIC CONTEMPT)BECAUSE THEY KNOW THEY ARE SUBJECT TO CRIMINAL CHARGES, ARREST, IMPEACHMENT AND JAIL TIME AND KNOW THEY WON’T BE GETTING 125 TRILLION DOLLARS VIA THEIR RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY AND 2)FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE CAUSE CHAOS, CONFUSION, CAUSE DIVISION AMONG AMERICANS TO DESTROY AMERICA THE NATION(THE DIVIDE AND CONQUER STRATEGY COMPLICIT WITH BIDEN TO ALLOW CHINA TO “SNEAK IN UNDETECTED” SEE OBAMA TRAIN CHINESE TROOP ON AMERICAN SOIL AND BIDEN HANDS OVER U.S. SOVEREIGNTY TO CHINA & WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION BASED ON “FRABRUCATED PLANDEMIC TO DEPOPULATE-AGENDA 21/30” – ISSUING A “NULL AND VOID ORDER” ANOTHER TERRIFYING, CONTROVERSIAL U.S. SUPREME COURT DECISIONS TO HARM, HURT AND/OR DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES OUT OF 125 TRILLION AS FOLLOWS: THE DECISION IS THE ACT IS CONTRARY TO THEIR “GLOBAL AGENDA TO DEPOPULATE, WOMEN RIGHTS GLOBALLY” AS FOLLOWS:

HORRIFIC, DISGRACEFUL, SUPREME COURT DECISION!!

KAMALA HARRIS JOINED THE U.S. SUPREME COURT RULING BY MAKING THIS STATEMENT AND INFORMS .S. CITIZENS THAT OTHER U.S. CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS ARE IN THE PROCESS OF BEING TAKING AWAY AS FOLLOWS:  https://news.yahoo.com/poll-confidence-in-supreme-court-collapses-as-just-33-agree-with-decision-to-overturn-roe-v-wade-090021689.html) “inadvertently!!”

BIDEN SUPPORTS SUPREME COURT DECISION AND IS CO-CONSPIRATOR AS FOLLOWS:

JOE BIDEN, 2006: "I do not view abortion as a choice and a right. I think it's always a tragedy."

JOE BIDEN, 2022: Abortion-on-demand, without limits, until birth. pic.twitter.com/R45umDefNu

— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) June 24, 2022

AMERICANS POLLS VIA ABORTIONS!! https://komonews.com/news/nation-world/poll-finds-growing-number-of-americans-prioritizing-abortion-womens-rights-women-united-states-health-care-supreme-court-roe-v-wade-president-joe-biden-democrats-republicans-washington-dc-midterm-elections-ap-norc-reproductive-freedom-white-house

ABORTION – WOMEN’S ISSUE AND/OR SUBJECT

MILLIONS AND/OR BILLIONS OF WOMEN(SOME SECRETLY), THROUGHOUT HISTORY INCLUDING TEENAGERS, EACH YEAR HAVE ABORTIONS, SOME OF THESE WOMEN HAVE BEEN RAPED VIOLENTLY BY FRAUD AND DECEIT, SOME HAVE HEALTH ISSUES, SOME RELIGIOUS, SOME WOMEN HAVE BEEN DECEITFULLY, RAPE BY  REPTILIAN FALLEN DEMONIC ANGELS, AND WERE IMPREGNATED BY “DEMONS, ” WHICH PRODUCED “HYBRID” BEING “NOT A PART OF GOD’S CREATION, CALLED THE NEPHILIM , WHICH PRODUCED EVIL GIANTS. SUBSEQUENTLY GOD COMMAND THE FIRST KING OF ISRAEL, KING SAUL TO KILL, EVERY MAN, WOMEN, CHILD AND BABY TO WIPE THIS “ILLEGAL DEMONIC INTRUSION ON HUMANITY”( GOD HAD TO DESTROY “HUMANITY” VIA “NOAH FLOOD-THE CORRUPTED EVIL RACE AND/OR PEOPLE, WHICH PARALLEL TO WHAT IS HAPPENING TODAY, MEN AND WOMEN DNA ALTERED BY THE ILLEGAL, “VOID” U.S. SUPREME COURT RULING – SYNTHETIC DNA RULING – THE COV-19 INJECTION SEE THIS WEBSITE)ENTIRE HUMANITY WILL BE CORRUPTED BY THIS DECEITFUL, COV-19 INJECTION – AND THEIR WILL BE NO HOPE FOR ALL WHO GET THE COMING “INVISIBLE “LUCIFER” “RACE”(LUCIFERASE) TATTOO “MARK OF THE BEAST” THAT THEY MAY NOT BUY OR SELL, ” And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.” Revelation 13:16-17

“If anyone worships the beast and his image, and receives his mark on his forehead or on his hand, he himself shall also drink of the wine of the wrath of God . . . . And the smoke of their torment ascends forever and ever; and they have no rest day or night. . . . Here is the patience of the saints; here are those who keep the commandments of God and the faith of Jesus.” (Rev. 14:9-12) – THE SECOND DESTRUCTION OF THE “SATAN’S RACE” IS NEAR, AND THE SECOND RETURN OF YESHUA/JESUS CHRIST IS VERY, VERY NEAR!! WHICH GOD HAD TO DESTROY VIA “NOAH FLOOD!!” hybrid sons of fallen angels

WOMEN RIGHTS ARE HUMAN RIGHTS!!

KAMALA HARRIS( INELIGIBLE TO HOLD PUBLIC OFFICE AND WHO ILLEGALLY UPSURPS THE PUBLIC OFFICE AS VICE PRESIDENT ONE OR MORE OF HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS VICE PRESIDENT)HOLD THE CONFIRMATION HEARING FOR K.J. BROWN – (K.J. JACKSON CONSPIRED WITH MERRICK GARLAND, OTHER U.S. FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT JUDGES TO DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES OF MONEY AND/OR PROPERTY-SEE ABOVE) SUPREME COURT JUSTICES

“THE UNITED STATES HAD A LEGAL DUTY TO QUIT, FIND OTHER EMPLOYEE ETC. IS DISQUALIFIED FROM HOLDING OFFICE AS THE U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICE AND IS RETRO-ACTIVITY IMPEACHED!!

U.S. FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT JUDGE FOR D.C. AND/OR U.S. COURT OF APPEALS IS SWORN IN AS U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICE TO ADVANCE AND FURTHER THE CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE AS FOLLOWS: SEE ONE OR MORE CERTIFIED LETTERS SENT K. J. BROWN.

“THE UNITED STATES HAD A LEGAL DUTY TO QUIT, FIND OTHER EMPLOYEE ETC. IS DISQUALIFIED FROM HOLDING OFFICE AS THE U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICE AND IS RETRO-ACTIVITY IMPEACHED!!

ON OR ABOUT 6-30-2022

BREYER RETIRES-PASSES THE “CRIMINAL TORCH” TO K.J. BROWN TO FURTHER COMMIT WIRE FRAUD, DEFRAUD THE U.S.A. AND IT’S AGENCIES IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 371 AND DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES ETC.

CRIMINAL ROBERTS SWEAR IN CRIMINAL JACKSON AS FOLLOWS:

PREDICATE ACT #

K.J. 1ST DAY IN OFFICE voluntarily and intentionally devised or participated in a scheme to defraud THE TWO WITNESSES out of money WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW; AND DID SO WITH THE intent to defraud AND KNEW THAT interstate wire communications would be used; and DID IN FACT USE interstate wire communications were in fact used- WIRE FRAUD BY ISSUING ONE OR MORE OPINIONS AS FOLLOWS AND/OR ISSUING ONE OR MORE JUDGMENT AND/OR ORDER ENTITLED BIDEN VS. TEXAS(CONSOLIDATED WITH ONE OR MORE SHARON BRIDGEWATER VS. DONALD TRUMP ETC. – FRAUD ON COURT ETC.)IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1343 AS FOLLOWS:

KENTANJI BROWN JACKSON IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS U.S. FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT JUDGE FOR D.C. AND/OR U.S. COURT OF APPEALS RECEIVED ONE OR MORE CERTIFED MAILS FROM “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER

SEE AS FOLLOWS:

Judges and prosecutors have absolute immunity unless they totally lack subject-matter or personal jurisdiction in the case.

ISSUING ONE OR MORE TERRIFYING, NULL AND VOID JUDGMENTS AND OTHER WITH LACK OF SUBJECT-MATTER JURSIDICTION OR PERSONAL JURISDICTION, NO FINDINGS, ETC.

A judge acting without subject-matter jurisdiction is acting without judicial authority. Cohens v. Virginia,  19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L.Ed 257 (1821) The U.S. Supreme Court, in Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 94 S.Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974) stated that “when a state officer acts under a state law in a manner violative of the Federal Constitution”, he “comes into conflict with the superior authority of that Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or representative character and is subjected in his person to the consequences of his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him any immunity from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States.” [Emphasis supplied in original].

Plaintiff alleges that the prosecutors and judges sued in this case totally lacked subject matter jurisdiction and therefore pursued this prosecution and presided over this prosecution without any legal authority as individuals and trespassers of the Constitution of the United States. The sham prosecutors had no constitutional or statutory authority or jurisdiction to bring the Medicaid vendor fraud charge. The court had no subject matter jurisdiction because the indictment was legally insufficient and failed to state a charge, the charges were void as a violation of the Supremacy clause,

A Judge may not claim jurisdiction by fiat. All orders or judgments issued by a judge in a court of limited jurisdiction must contain the findings of the court showing that the court has subject-matter jurisdiction, not allegations that the court has jurisdiction. “. . . in a special statutory proceeding an order must contain the jurisdictional findings prescribed by statute.” In re Jennings, 68 Ill.2d 125, 368 N.E.2d 864 (1977) A judge’s allegation that he has subject-matter jurisdiction is only an allegation. Lombard v. Elmore,  134 Ill.App.3d 898, 480 N.E.2d 1329 (1st Dist. 1985), Hill v. Daily, 28 Ill.App.3d 202, 204, 328 N.E.2d 142 (1975). Inspection of the record of the case is the controlling factor. If the record of the case does not support subject-matter jurisdiction, then the judge has acted without subject-matter jurisdiction.  “If it could not legally hear the matter upon the jurisdictional paper presented, its finding that it had the power can add nothing to its authority, – it had no authority to make that finding.” The People v. Brewer, 328 Ill. 472, 483 (1928) Without the specific finding of jurisdiction by the court in an order or judgment, the order or judgment does not comply with the law and is void. The finding can not be merely an unsupported allegation.

​

The law is well-settled that a void order or judgment is void even before reversal. “Courts are constituted by authority and they cannot go beyond that power delegated to them. If they act beyond that authority, and certainly in contravention of it, their judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void, and this even prior to reversal.” Vallely v. Northern Fire & Marine Ins. Co.,  254 U.S. 348, 41 S.Ct. 116 (1920)

​

A court has no jurisdiction where the public policy of the State of Illinois is violated [a crime must be alleged and state ALL the elements of the offense for the complaint to be valid], People v. Meyers, 158 Ill.2d 46, 51 (1994);  Martin-Tregona v. Roderick, 29 Ill.App.3d 553, 331 N.E.2d 100 (1st Dist. 1975).

​

Courts may not attempt to resolve controversies which are not properly presented to them for, if they should do so, it would violate not only the precepts of Constitutional due process, but would fly in the face of the American tradition of adversary litigation. In Re Custody of Ayala, 344 Ill.3d 574, 800 N.E.2d 524, 534-35 (1st Dis. 2003); Ligon v. Williams, 264 Ill.App.3d 701, 637 N.E.2d 633, 639 (1st Dis. 1994); In re Estate of Rice, 77 Ill.App.3d 641, 656-57, 396 N.E.2d 298, 310 (1979)

​

The Constitutional source of a circuit court’s jurisdiction does not carry with it a license to act in ways inconsistent with controlling statutory law. In re D.W. (People v. Lisa M.), 214 Ill.2d 289, 827 N.E.2d 466, 480 (Ill. 2005); In re Lawrence M., 172 Ill. 2d 523, 529, 670 N.E.2d 710, (Ill. 1996), citing In re M.M., 156 Ill. 2d 53, 75, 619 N.E.2d 702, (Ill. 1993) (Miller, C.J., concurring, joined by Bilandic, J.)

A void judgment, order, or decree is one in which the rendering court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction, lacked personnel jurisdiction, lacked the inherent power or authority to make or enter or enforce the particular order involved. In re D.W. (People v. Lisa M.), 214 Ill.2d 289, 827 N.E.2d 466, 480 (Ill. 2005); People v. Thompson, 209 Ill.2d 19, 23, 805 N.E.2d 1200, 1203 (Ill. 2004); Sarkissian v. Chicago Board of Education, 201 Ill.2d 95, 103, 776 N.E.2d 195, (Ill. 2002), quoting Barnard v. Michael, 392 Ill. 130, 135, 63 N.E.2d 858 (1945).  A judge should not proceed in any action in which the judge does not have subject-matter jurisdiction, since she has no lawful authority to act. Any acts made without jurisdiction are void.

The Illinois Supreme Court has held that “if the magistrate has not such jurisdiction, then he and those who advise and act with him, or execute his process, are trespassers.” Von Kettler et.al. v. Johnson, 57 Ill. 109 (1870)

​

Under Federal law which is applicable to all states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is “without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in opposition to them. They constitute no justification; and all persons concerned in executing such judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers.” Elliot v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)

​

The Illinois Supreme Court held that if a court “could not hear the matter upon the jurisdictional paper presented, its finding that it had the power can add nothing to its authority, – it had no authority to make that finding.” The People v. Brewer, 128 Ill. 472, 483 (1928). The judges listed below had no legal authority (jurisdiction) to hear or rule on certain matters before them. They acted without any jurisdiction.

​

When judges act when they do not have jurisdiction to act, or they enforce a void order (an order issued by a judge without jurisdiction), they become trespassers of the law,and are engaged in treason (see below).

​

The Court in Yates v. Village of Hoffman Estates, Illinois, 209 F.Supp. 757 (N.D. Ill. 1962) held that “not every action by a judge is in exercise of his judicial function. … it is not a judicial function for a judge to commit an intentional tort even though the tort occurs in the courthouse.”

​

When a judge acts as a trespasser of the law, when a judge does not follow the law, the judge loses subject-matter jurisdiction and the judge’s orders are void, of no legal force or effect.

​

By law, a judge is a state officer. The judge then acts not as a judge, but as a private individual (in his person).

______________________________

Whenever a judge acts where he/she does not have jurisdiction to act, the judge is engaged in an act or acts of treason. U.S. v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 216, 101 S.Ct. 471, 66 L.Ed.2d 392, 406 (1980); Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L.Ed 257 (1821)

​

The Supreme Court has also held that if a judge wars against the Constitution, or if he acts without jurisdiction, he has engaged in treason to the Constitution. If a judge acts after he has been automatically disqualified by law, then he is acting without jurisdiction, and that suggest that he is then engaging in criminal acts of treason, and may be engaged in extortion and the interference with interstate commerce.

Courts have repeatedly ruled that judges have no immunity for their criminal acts. Since both treason and the interference with interstate commerce are criminal acts, no judge has immunity to engage in such acts.

​

​e grand jury without approval of the State’s Attorney.

INDICTMENTS, CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS AGAINST THE TWO WTINESSESES LEGALLY INSUFFICIENT SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION OF THE COURT

​

​

A Judge may not claim jurisdiction by fiat. All orders or judgments issued by a judge in a court of limited jurisdiction must contain the findings of the court showing that the court has subject-matter jurisdiction, not allegations that the court has jurisdiction. “. . . in a special statutory proceeding an order must contain the jurisdictional findings prescribed by statute.” In re Jennings, 68 Ill.2d 125, 368 N.E.2d 864 (1977) A judge’s allegation that he has subject-matter jurisdiction is only an allegation. Lombard v. Elmore,  134 Ill.App.3d 898, 480 N.E.2d 1329 (1st Dist. 1985), Hill v. Daily, 28 Ill.App.3d 202, 204, 328 N.E.2d 142 (1975). Inspection of the record of the case is the controlling factor. If the record of the case does not support subject-matter jurisdiction, then the judge has acted without subject-matter jurisdiction.  “If it could not legally hear the matter upon the jurisdictional paper presented, its finding that it had the power can add nothing to its authority, – it had no authority to make that finding.” The People v. Brewer, 328 Ill. 472, 483 (1928) Without the specific finding of jurisdiction by the court in an order or judgment, the order or judgment does not comply with the law and is void. The finding can not be merely an unsupported allegation.

​

The law is well-settled that a void order or judgment is void even before reversal. “Courts are constituted by authority and they cannot go beyond that power delegated to them. If they act beyond that authority, and certainly in contravention of it, their judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but simply void, and this even prior to reversal.” Vallely v. Northern Fire & Marine Ins. Co.,  254 U.S. 348, 41 S.Ct. 116 (1920)

​

A court has no jurisdiction where the public policy of the State of Illinois is violated [a crime must be alleged and state ALL the elements of the offense for the complaint to be valid], People v. Meyers, 158 Ill.2d 46, 51 (1994);  Martin-Tregona v. Roderick, 29 Ill.App.3d 553, 331 N.E.2d 100 (1st Dist. 1975).

​

Courts may not attempt to resolve controversies which are not properly presented to them for, if they should do so, it would violate not only the precepts of Constitutional due process, but would fly in the face of the American tradition of adversary litigation. In Re Custody of Ayala, 344 Ill.3d 574, 800 N.E.2d 524, 534-35 (1st Dis. 2003); Ligon v. Williams, 264 Ill.App.3d 701, 637 N.E.2d 633, 639 (1st Dis. 1994); In re Estate of Rice, 77 Ill.App.3d 641, 656-57, 396 N.E.2d 298, 310 (1979)

​

The Constitutional source of a circuit court’s jurisdiction does not carry with it a license to act in ways inconsistent with controlling statutory law. In re D.W. (People v. Lisa M.), 214 Ill.2d 289, 827 N.E.2d 466, 480 (Ill. 2005); In re Lawrence M., 172 Ill. 2d 523, 529, 670 N.E.2d 710, (Ill. 1996), citing In re M.M., 156 Ill. 2d 53, 75, 619 N.E.2d 702, (Ill. 1993) (Miller, C.J., concurring, joined by Bilandic, J.)

A void judgment, order, or decree is one in which the rendering court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction, lacked personnel jurisdiction, lacked the inherent power or authority to make or enter or enforce the particular order involved. In re D.W. (People v. Lisa M.), 214 Ill.2d 289, 827 N.E.2d 466, 480 (Ill. 2005); People v. Thompson, 209 Ill.2d 19, 23, 805 N.E.2d 1200, 1203 (Ill. 2004); Sarkissian v. Chicago Board of Education, 201 Ill.2d 95, 103, 776 N.E.2d 195, (Ill. 2002), quoting Barnard v. Michael, 392 Ill. 130, 135, 63 N.E.2d 858 (1945).  A judge should not proceed in any action in which the judge does not have subject-matter jurisdiction, since she has no lawful authority to act. Any acts made without jurisdiction are void.

​

TREASON BY ALL JUDGE(S) VIA DENIAL OF COURT ACCESS AND KNOWINGLY, INTENTIONALLY, WILLFULLY, EXPLOITATION OF A “SINGLE DISABLED FEMALE-OF GOVT. FRAUD, ABUSE, OPRESSION” ABUSE OF COURT SYSTEM TO DEFRAUD

​

Knowingly, intentionally conspired and continues to conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate the two witnesses both Sharon and/or James S. Bridgewater residents of the State of Michigan from the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of one or both exercised their right to file a complaint in the U.S. District Courts for the crimes the Racketeered Influenced Organization committed and adopted the acts of Obama and/or Holder intervened in a lawsuit to defraud the two witnesses

If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 241 AND/OR

• Section 242 of Title 18 makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.For the purpose of Section 242, acts under “color of law” include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within their lawful authority, but also acts done beyond the bounds of that official’s lawful authority, if the acts are done while the official is purporting to or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. Persons acting under color of law within the meaning of this statute include police officers, prisons guards and other law enforcement officials, as well as judges, care providers in public health facilities, and others who are acting as public officials. It is not necessary that the crime be motivated by animus toward the race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin of the victim.The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term, or the death penalty, depending upon the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury, and for

TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 242

CONSPIRING WITH OBAMA AND HOLDER(AND LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS TO THREATEN TO USE DANGEROUS WEAPON GUNS AND/OR EXPLOSIVE ON BRIDGEWATER – ASSAULT BATTERY BRIDGEWATER RIGHT BEFORE THE 2012 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS, ON THE ACCOUNT THAT BRIDGEWATER

Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, … shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

Whenever a judge acts where he/she does not have jurisdiction to act, the judge is engaged in an act or acts of treason. U.S. v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 216, 101 S.Ct. 471, 66 L.Ed.2d 392, 406 (1980); Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L.Ed 257 (1821)

​

The Supreme Court has also held that if a judge wars against the Constitution, or if he acts without jurisdiction, he has engaged in treason to the Constitution. If a judge acts after he has been automatically disqualified by law, then he is acting without jurisdiction, and that suggest that he is then engaging in criminal acts of treason, and may be engaged in extortion and the interference with interstate commerce. Treason and the interference with interstate commerce are criminal acts, no judge has immunity to engage in such acts.

​

​

INDICTMENTS, CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS AGAINST THE TWO WTINESSESES LEGALLY INSUFFICIENT SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION OF THE COURT

​

​

​

JUDICIAL TRESPASSERS OF THE LAVOID ORDERS, WRITS, JUDGMENTES, ETC. 

​

​

VIOLATION OF JUDGE’S OATH OF OFFICE

​

In Illinois, 705 ILCS 205/4 states “Every person admitted to practice as an attorney and counselor at law shall, before his name is entered upon the roll to be kept as hereinafter provided, take and subscribe an oath, substantially in the following form:

​

‘I do solemnly swear (or affirm, as the case may be), that I will support the constitution of the United States and the constitution of the state of Illinois, and that I will faithfully discharge the duties of the office of attorney and counselor at law to the best of my ability.'”

​

In Illinois, a judge must take a second oath of office. Under 705 ILCS 35/2 states, in part, that “The several judges of the circuit courts of this State, before entering upon the duties of their office, shall take and subscribe the following oath or affirmation, which shall be filed in the office of the Secretary of State:

​

‘I do solemnly swear (or affirm, as the case may be) that I will support the constitution of the United States, and the constitution of the State of Illinois, and that I will faithfully discharge the duties of judge of ______ court, according to the best of my ability.'”

​

Further, if the judge had enlisted in the U.S. military, then he has taken a third oath. Under Title 10 U.S.C. Section 502 the judge had subscribed to a lifetime oath, in pertinent part, as follows: “I, __________, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign or domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; …”.

​

The U.S. Supreme Court has stated that “No state legislator or executive or judicial officer can war against the Constitution without violating his undertaking to support it.”. Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1, 78 S.Ct. 1401 (1958).

​

Any judge who does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United States wars against that Constitution and engages in acts in violation of the Supreme Law of the Land. The judge is engaged in acts of treason.

​

Having taken at least two, if not three, oaths of office to support the Constitution of the United States, and the Constitution of the State of Illinois, any judge who has acted in violation of the Constitution is engaged in an act or acts of treason (see below).

​

If a judge does not fully comply with the Constitution, then his orders are void, In re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (1888), he/she is without jurisdiction, and he/she has engaged in an act or acts of treason.

​

FRAUD UPON THE COURT BY PROSECUTOR’S,

BY CONSPIRING WITH MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPCITY AS D.C. CHIEF JUDGE, AND DISTRICT COURT JUDGES – DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AND OTHER JUDGES FRAUD ON THE COURT AND CONTINUES TO COMMIT FRAUD ON THE COURT!

(AND/OR U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL)  INVALIDATES ALL ORDERS OF COURT

Fraud upon the court in obtaining a complaint, information, or indictment invalidates all orders of the court and causes the case to be null and void ab initio.  “Fraud upon the court” has been defined by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals to “embrace that species of fraud which does, or attempts to, defile the court itself, or is a fraud perpetrated by officers of the court so that the judicial machinery can not perform in the usual manner its impartial task of adjudging cases that are presented for adjudication.” Kenner v. C.I.R., 387 F.3d 689 (1968); 7 Moore’s Federal Practice, 2d ed., p. 512, ¶ 60.23. The 7th Circuit further stated “a decision produced by fraud upon the court is not in essence a decision at all, and never becomes final.”

​

 It is also clear and well-settled Illinois law that any attempt to commit “fraud upon the court” vitiates the entire proceeding. People v. Sterling, 357 Ill. 354; 192 N.E. 229 (1934) (“The maxim that fraud vitiates every transaction into which it enters applies to judgments as well as to contracts and other transactions.”); Moore v. Sievers, 336 Ill. 316; 168 N.E. 259 (1929) (“The maxim that fraud vitiates every transaction into which it enters …”); In re Village of Willowbrook, 37 Ill.App.2d 393 (1962) (“It is axiomatic that fraud vitiates everything.”); Dunham v. Dunham, 57 Ill.App. 475 (1894), affirmed 162 Ill. 589 (1896); Skelly Oil Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co., 338 Ill.App. 79, 86 N.E.2d 875, 883-4 (1949); Stasel v. The American Home Security Corporation, 362 Ill. 350; 199 N.E. 798 (1935).

Under Illinois and Federal law, when any officer of the court has committed “fraud upon the court”, the orders and judgment resulting from such fraud on that court are void, of no legal force or effect.

​

In this case the fraud consisted of the Illinois Attorney General fraudulently claiming to have the authority to prosecute vendor fraud without the at least minimal participation and knowledge of the States Attorney of Cook County, the State fraudulently presenting the law to the court and ignoring the Supremacy clause as well as the State Codes and Rules, the State fraudulently claiming Defendant had committed a crime, the State fraudulently claiming that the indictment was legally sufficient, the State fraudulently claiming that the statute of limitations had not run out, the State fraudulently agreeing with the court that Federal Medicaid Code was not applicable in this case of Medicaid vendor fraud,

Judges and prosecutors have absolute immunity unless they totally lack subject-matter or personal jurisdiction in the case.

A judge acting without subject-matter jurisdiction is acting without judicial authority. Cohens v. Virginia,  19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L.Ed 257 (1821) The U.S. Supreme Court, in Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 94 S.Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974) stated that “when a state officer acts under a state law in a manner violative of the Federal Constitution”, he “comes into conflict with the superior authority of that Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or representative character and is subjected in his person to the consequences of his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him any immunity from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States.” [Emphasis supplied in original].

​

State officials may be sued as individuals in § 1983 actions. Brokaw v. Mercer County, 235 F.3d 1000 (7th Cir. 2000).

​

Plaintiff alleges that the prosecutors and judges sued in this case totally lacked subject matter jurisdiction and therefore pursued this prosecution and presided over this prosecution without any legal authority as individuals and trespassers of the Constitution of the United States. The sham prosecutors had no constitutional or statutory authority or jurisdiction to bring the Medicaid vendor fraud charge. The court had no subject matter jurisdiction because the indictment was legally insufficient and failed to state a charge, the charges were void as a violation of the Supremacy clause, the charges were void due to vagueness, and therefore there was a total and complete failure to charge a crime.

​

ARTICLE III, SECTION III OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION, STATES TREASON AGAINST THE UNITED STATES, SHALL CONSIST ONLY IN LEVYING WAR AGAINST THEM OR ADHERING TO THEIR ENEMIES, GIVING AID AND COMFORT. NO PERSON SHALL BE CONVICTED OF TREASON UNLESS ON THE TESTIMONY WITNESSES TO THE SAME OVERT ACT OR ON CONFESSION IN OPEN COURT. ACCORDING TO ARTICLE III SECTION III A PERSON IS GUILTY OF TREASON IF HE OR SHE GOES TO WAR AGAINST THE UNITED STATES OR GIVES “AID OR COMFORT” TO AN ENEMY. HE OR SHE DOES NOT HAVE TO PHYSICALLY PICK UP A WEAPON AND FIGHT IN COMBAT AGAINST U.S. TROOPS. ACTIVELY HELPING THE ENEMY BY PASSING ALONG CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS OR SUPPLYING WEAPONS, U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES AND/OR “ANY JUDGE,” KNOWINGLY, INTENTIONALLY DENYING AND DEPRIVING THE TWO WITNESSES & U.S. CITIZENS, THE RIGHT TO SPEECH, RELIGION, PRESS, ASSEMBLY AND/OR THE RIGHT TO PETITION THE GOVERNMENT, DENIAL OF COURT ACCESS(THE TWO WITNESSES-DISMISSAL OF 45 OR MORE CASES) AND/OR OTHER U.S. CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS CAN LEAD TO CHARGE AND CONVICTION OF TREASON. COMES NOW “TWO WITNESSES AND VICTIMS” IN OPEN COURT & PURSUANT TO ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME LAW – COMMON LAW REMEDIES AND/OR THE RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATION ACT(RICO) GIVES NOTICE OF ONE OR MORE TESTIMONY, CONFESSION, “NOTICE OF ONE OR MORE DECLARATORY, ADJUDICATION, BIFURCATED TRIAL, OF THE SAME OVERT ACT – AND DECLARE THAT U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES,

WITNESS TAMPERING IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S. Code § 1512 – Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant

(1)influence, delay, or prevent the testimony of any person in an official proceeding;

(2)cause or induce any person to—

(A)withhold testimony, or withhold a record, document, or other object, from an official proceeding;

(B)alter, destroy, mutilate, or conceal an object with intent to impair the object’s integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding;

(C)evade legal process summoning that person to appear as a witness, or to produce a record, document, or other object, in an official proceeding; or

(D)be absent from an official proceeding to which such person has been summoned by legal process; or

(3)hinder, delay, or prevent the communication to a law enforcement officer or judge of the United States of information relating to the commission or possible commission of a Federal offense or a violation of conditions of probation [1] supervised release,,[1] parole, or release pending judicial proceedings;

UPON INFORMATION ALL KNEW AND WERE AWARE THAT “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR” WAS THE ONLY PERSON IN THE WORLD WITH STANDING, THE ONLY PERSON IN THE WORLD “TO OBTAIN RELIEF AND JAIL THE PERPETRATORS FOR GENOCIDE, ETC.,”

18 U.S. Code § 1512 – Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant

https://www.bitchute.com/video/msUHueQSg6fG/

AND FROM JOINING “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR” IN THE CLASS PROSECUTION AND TO USE THE MEDIA,

The principal statutes in this area contained in chapter 73 of United States Code Title 18 are:

• section 1501 (misdemeanor to obstruct a federal process or writ server);
• section 1502 (misdemeanor to obstruct or resist an extradition agent);
• section 1503 (felony provision that targets efforts to influence or injure a court officer or juror, as well as other obstructionary efforts);
• section 1504 (misdemeanor to influence a juror by writing);
• section 1505 (felony to obstruct proceedings before departments, agencies, committees);
• section 1506 (felony to steal or alter a court record or provide a phony bail surety);
• section 1507 (misdemeanor to picket or parade with the intent of impeding or obstructing the administration of justice);
• section 1508 (misdemeanor to record or observe proceedings of grand or petit juries while deliberating or voting);
• section 1509 (misdemeanor to obstruct court orders); section 1510 (felony to obstruct criminal investigations);
• section 1511 (felony to obstruct state or local law enforcement with the intent to facilitate an illegal gambling business);
• section 1512 (felony to tamper with a witness, victim, or informant);
• section 1513 (felony to retaliate against a witness, victim, or informant);
• section 1516 (felony to obstruct a federal audit);
• section 1517 (felony to obstruct the examination of a financial institution); and
• section 1518 (felony to obstruct a criminal investigation of health care offenses.

Section 1503 offers broad protection to the “due administration of justice” by stating that a person who “corruptly or by threats of force, or by threatening letter or communication, influences, obstructs, or impedes, or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede, the due administration of justice” is guilty of the crime of obstruction of justice.

11 U.S. Code § 548 – Fraudulent transfers and obligations

https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/currencies/russian-demand-china-currency-ruble-yuan-trading-volume-forex-sanctions-2022-7

FACEBOOK FRAUDULANT SETTLEMENT

https://www.khou.com/article/news/verify/how-to-cash-in-on-90-million-facebook-settlement/285-b0ddc788-923c-437b-91fb-0bd7be4515a5

https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/currencies/russian-demand-china-currency-ruble-yuan-trading-volume-forex-sanctions-2022-7

ON OR ABOUT 6-30-2022

MEANWHILE, WITH NO OTHER OPTIONS FOR PEOPLE TO RUN FOR PRESIDENT THE POPE FURTHER COMMIT CRIMINAL ACTS AGAINST THE TWO WITNESSES, MEET PEOLOSI IN VATICAN, SO THAT PEOLOSI CAN RUN FOR PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES IN 2024(THE CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION KNOW THEY HAVE PRETTY MUCH “EXHAUSTED THE CRIMINAL OPTIONS TO DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSESS TO OBTAIN 125 TRILLION) AND CONTINUE TO EXPLOIT AND DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES !!

“THE UNITED STATES HAD A LEGAL DUTY TO QUIT, FIND OTHER EMPLOYEE ETC. IS DISQUALIFIED FROM HOLDING OFFICE AS THE U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICE AND IS RETRO-ACTIVITY IMPEACHED!!Ketanji Brown Jackson

United States federal judge

OVERT ACT!!

CLICK THE BELOW LINK FOR THE TRUE CHARACTER OF AKA “THE POPE!”

https://www.thefinalexodus.com/the-pope-criminal-acts-or-omissions

BIDEN “ATTEMPTED” DAMAGE CONTROL!!

OR ABOUT JUNE 30, 2022, I AMENDED THIS PAGE TO INCLUDE THE ABOVE NO ONE TO RUN FOR PRESIDENCY, BIDEN ATTEMPTS TO “UNDUE” THE DAMAGE THE “ALL AGREED TO LIBEL” BRIDGEWATER, ETC. AND BIDEN ATTEMPTS TO GET “BROWNIE POINTS” TO REMAIN PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES(REMEMBER HE IS GUILTY OF TREASON-SEE BIDEN GIVES U.S. SOVERIGNTY TO CHINA AND THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION – BASED ON FABRICATED ” – ATTEMPTED TO COMMIT TREASON IS THE SAME ACT AS TREASON)

https://news.yahoo.com/biden-congress-get-rid-of-filibuster-codify-roe-abortion-rights-law-141817563.html

DAMAGE CONTROL

THE CAPITOL ATTACKS – NEARLY “ONE AND/HALF YEARS OLD” AND WITHOUT TRUMP BEING PROSECUTED OR HELD ACCOUNTABLE IS RESTARTED AND BECAUSE THEY KNOW I COMMENCED THIS WEBPAGE ON OR ABOUT JUNE 23, 2022 AS FOLLOWS:

https://www.cbsnews.com/live-updates/house-january-6-hearing-schedule-trump-justice-department-watch-live-stream-2022-06-23/

GARLAND WON’T PROSECUTE THE PRIMARY LEADERS”TRUMP IN THE CAPITOL ATTACKS AND/OR FAIL TO PROTECT U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES BECAUSE HE IS “CRIMINAL CO-CONSPIRATOR AND WILL COMMIT ONE OR MORE OVERT ACTS IF HE DOES PROSECUTE FOR CRIMES HE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR AS FOLLOWS:

PANDEMIC I AMENDED THIS WEBPAGE TO INCLUDE THE ABOVE, IN TURN BIDEN CALL Biden calls on Congress to remove filibuster rule to codify Roe IN FURTHERANCE OF THE SCHEME TO DEFRAUD “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR” WIRE FRAUD, MONEY LAUNDERING ETC. MONEY AND/OR PROPERTY WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW

IN FURTHERANCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL RACKET

EU Sets First Rules to Regulate Cryptocurrencies(WIRE FRAUD, MONEY LAUNDERING ETC. KNOWINGLY, INTENTIONALLY, ATTEMPTS AND/OR SET RULES to obscure the source of criminal proceeds VIA cybercriminals, ease of use and the ability to circumvent international borders and regulations, in essence, to launder the ill-gotten proceeds.)TO LAUNDER MONEY!!

Agreement follows months of turmoil in the crypto market

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/06/30/eu-agrees-to-deal-on-landmark-mica-cryptocurrency-regulation.html

https://www.wsj.com/articles/eu-sets-first-rules-to-regulate-cryptocurrencies-11656682089

DECLARATORY JUDGMENT THAT THE E.U. CRIMINAL DEFENDANTS WITH “WARRANTS FOR ARREST AND/OR EXTRADITION ARREST WARRANTS – FOR GENOCIDE AND RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY LACKS THE ABILITY TO RULE AND/OR CONTROL “ANY” U.S.CORPORATION, AND ALL RULINGS, JUDGMENTS ETC. REGARDING TELSA, META, FACEBOOK, “OR ANY AMERICAN CORPORATION” IS NULL VOID AND WITHOUT ANY LEGAL EFFECT!!

“THE WHITE SURRENDER FLAG!!”

DAMAGE CONTROL BIDEN AND HARRIS HYPOCRITS AND CO-CONSPIRATORS WITH SUPREME COURT VIA COV-19 INJECTION – GENOCIDE ON HUMANITY AND LIBEL OF BRIDGEWATER – TWO PEOPLE THAT KNOWINGLY, INTENTIONALLY CONSPIRED WITH U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES PUT ON A FALSE APPEARANCE BECAUSE THEY KNOW THEY MADE A “GROSS-ERROR” BY CONSPIRING WITH U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICE AND ATTACKING BRIDGEWATER VIA “PAST ABORTION” BY OVER-TURNING ROE V. WADE, BECAUSE THEY KNOW THEIR ILLEGAL, GROSS, DECISION IN RETALIATION EFFECTS APPROX 40 MILLION PEOPLE AND DIVIDE THE COUNTRY(SOMETHING THEY ARE TRYING TO DO BUT “GOT CAUGHT IN THE ACT”)

Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

ONE OR MORE OF THE WEALTHEST COUNTRIES PRESIDENTS DIES AS FOLLOWS:

ANGELA MERKEL “THE HOLOCAUST LEADER(AKA THE WHORE OF BABYLON LABELED INVISIBLE)”HIDES

U.K. BORIS JOHNSON RESIGNS

UAE President Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed Al Nahyan dies aged 73

JAPAN LONGEST SERVICE PRIME MINISTER “SUPPOSEDLY” ASSASSINATED AS FOLLOWS:

JULY 18, 2022

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/07/18/fauci-retiring-end-of-biden-term/

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/jul/18/anthony-fauci-retire-biden-first-term-trump-covid

https://ktla.com/news/fauci-to-retire-before-the-end-of-bidens-term/

JULY 8, 2022

DAMAGE CONTROL(OVERT ACT)

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/video/2022/jul/08/biden-signs-executive-order-protecting-abortion-access-video

BIDEN(“FALSELY-PRETENDS”)ATTEMPTS TO PROTECT BORDER OF U.S.A.

Biden asks Supreme Court to revive ability to prioritize certain immigrants for deportation

JULY 8, 2022

DAMAGE CONTROL(OVERT ACT)

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2022/07/08/biden-supreme-court-deportation-immigration-priorities/10016245002/

JULY 9, 2022

PREDICATE ACT – CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD THE UNITED STATES AND IT’S AGENCIES IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 371 AND/OR THE TWO WITNESSES

BIDEN JOINS TRUMPS ABRAM ACCORD AND JOINS HIS CRIMINAL PARTNER TRUMP, UAE, ISRAEL, NAFTALI BENNETT, BENNY GANTZ,

BIDE

IN FURTHERANCE OF THE SCHEME TO DEFRAUD BIDEN “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR AND/OR THE U.S.A. AND IT’S DEPARTMENTS, AGENCIES IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 371, AND/OR DESTROY AMERICA BIDEN DEPLETES OIL SUPPLY AS FOLLOWS:

XI JINPING(CHINA), PUTIN(RUSSIA), BRAZIL(Jair Bolsonaro), INDIA(Narendra Modi), South Africa (Cyril Ramaphosa)

MONTH OF MAY THUR JUNE AND JULY 2022

UNCONSTITUTIONAL TRAFFIC STOPS, HARRASSMENT

JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER- AN INDIVIDUAL HARRASSED BY MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY AS U.S. ATTORNEY, ACTED IN JOINT PARTICIPATION AGAIN WITH DETROIT POLICE DEPARTMENT, FALSELY ARREST JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER AS HE WAS WALKING HOME FROM PLAYING BASKETEBALL.

AGAI

AND ON MANY OCCASIONS

HA

FAILED TO NOW SEEK TO SLANDER AND HARRASS JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER

MAY 29TH, 2022

TWO ANN ARBOR POLICE OFFICERS ONE DAY BEFORE MEMORIAL DAY, UNCONSTITUTIONAL TRAFFIC STOP AND SAID I WAS GOING TO SLOW, WHEN IN REALITY THEY WERE “ON MY TAIL – ALMOST PUSHING MY CAR FROM BEHIND” – OFFICER GONZALES

JUNE

AGAIN ON MY WAY TO THE GYM AN ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN AGAIN UNCONSTITUTIONAL TRAFFIC STOP, I ASKED HIM WHY DID HE STOP ME, HE REPLIED ” THIS CAR IS NOT REGISTERED” HE THEN TOOK MY LICENSE, AND CAME BACK TO ME AND STATED THAT HIS COMPUTER WAS NOW WORKING AND THAT I WAS FREE TO GO!!

JUNE

 

“Satan,” means “adversary.” This name indicates Satan’s basic nature: he is the enemy of God, of all God does, and of all God loves.

He is also called “the devil” in the New Testament. The word “devil” means “false accuser” or “slanderer.” Satan plays this role in Job 1–2 when he attacks Job’s character.

the utterance of false charges or misrepresentations which defame and damage another’s reputation

2: a false and defamatory oral statement about a person

JULY 17, 2021

AGAIN ONE OR MORE FORIEGN OFFICIALS TRUMP, BIDEN, HARRIS, LYNCH, OBAMA,U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, JUDGE CHARLES ATCHLEY JR. APPOINTED BY TRUMP AND “CRIMINAL CO-CONSPIRATOR” ET AL(SATAN REPRESENTATIVES) ABUSE U.S. COURT IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 371 KNOWINGLY, INTENTIONALLY AGAIN EXPLOIT TWO SOCIO-ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED SHARON AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER, AGAIN COMMIT FRAUD ON THE COURT, WIRE FRAUD IN VIOLATION OF 1) a scheme or artifice to defraud; and (2) use of interstate wire communication to facilitate that scheme) 

AGAINS

https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/global-ceos-announce-67-bln-euros-investment-macrons-versailles-summit-2022-07-10/

TYPICAL CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR [EVERYONE “POINTS THE FINGER TO THEIR CRIMINAL PARTNER(S)”]JULY 19, 2022

OVERT ACT!! REPUBLICANS

MERRICK GARLAND(AND THOSE OPERATING UNDER HIS DIRECTION)CRIMINALS INVESTIGATING AND PROSECUTING CO-CONSPIRATORS CRIMINAL PARTNERS!

JULY 19, 2022

OVERT ACT – DEMOCRATS!! OVERT ACT

U.S. REPRESENTATIVE “CRIMINAL” CO-CONSPIRATORS AND U.S. SUPREME COURT JUDGE PARTNERS CREATE CHAOS, DIVISION, AMONG U.S. CITIZENS ETC. ACT IN JOINT PARTICIPATION WITH THOSE OPERATING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF MERRICK GARLAND(AND THOSE OPERATING UNDER HIS DIRECTION CAPITOL POLICE JAN. 6, 2021) CO-CONSPIRATORS