INTERESTING FACTS ABOUT SHARON BRIDGEWATER – BORN IN SAGINAW, MICHIGAN, HOUSE ADDRESS: 1611 (AS IN THE HOLY BIBLE 1611 KING JAMES VERSION; AND SHARON ONE AND ONLY SON NAME IS JAMES) JOHNSON STREET

FAVORITE CHILDHOOD GAME, FAVORITE MOVIES – CLICK HERE

            

IN ADDITION SHARON BRIDGEWATER VIA THE “50 STATES” EX REL PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR QUI TAM RELATOR “COMMON LAW” INTERNATIONALLY PROTECTED PERSON (and/or James S. Bridgewater)are “National of the United States” and as defined within the meaning prescribed in section 101(a)(22) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(22)) AND and representatives, and/or agent of the United States Government(the people of the 50 States) who at the time and place concerned is entitled pursuant to international law to special protection against attack upon his person, freedom, or dignity, and any member of his family then forming part of his household and as defined in 18 U.S. Code § 1116 (a)(4)(b)& 7(4)“Internationally protected persons ”

RETROACTIVE ADJUDICATION AND DECLARATORY JUDGMENT(BILATERAL CLASS ACTION REPRESENATIVES)-SEE INTERVENTION

ON OR ABOUT JAN. 1, 1993 CONTINING THRU TO 2009 AND CONTINUING THRU JAN. 6, 2021 ONE OR

GOD IN HEAVEN RESCUES TWO POOR AFRICAN AMERICAN WITNESSES!

CRIMINAL LAW AND PENALITIES

Also The Racketeered Influenced and Corrupt Organization(RICO) law -crimes and penalties can be found by clicking here —-HARBORING AND HIRING ILLEGAL IMMIGRATES FOR PROFIT IS A “RACKETEERING PREDICATE ACT AS DEFINED IN 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1961(1)!!”

________________________________________________________________________

CONTINUAL CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT HENIOUS ACTS AGAINST BOTH SHARON AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER

AND A DECLARATORY ADJUDICATION AND/OR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT(AND/OR DECREE) IN GENERAL will serve to terminate the uncertainty or controversy giving rise to the proceeding, and if:

(1) An actual controversy exists between contending parties;

(2) Antagonistic claims are present between the parties involved which indicate imminent and inevitable litigation; or

(3) A party asserts a legal relation, status, right, or privilege and this is challenged or denied by an adversary party, who also has or asserts a concrete interest in it.

Special remedies

(b) If a statute provides a special form of remedy for a specific type of case, that statutory remedy shall be followed in lieu of a proceeding under this subtitle.

Concurrent common-law, equitable, or extraordinary legal remedies

(c) A party may obtain a declaratory judgment or decree notwithstanding a concurrent common-law, equitable, or extraordinary legal remedy, whether or not recognized or regulated by statute.

Speedy hearing of an action

(e) A court may order a speedy hearing of an action of a declaratory judgment

THE ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME COURT AJUDICATED & DECLARED ONE OR MORE PAM BONDI, KAMALA HARRIS, MERRICK GARLAND, DONALD TRUMP, U.S. PUBLIC OFFICIALS AESIGNATED FOREIGN ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION ADOLF HITLER FOREIGN TERRORIST ORGANIZATION

ALL CRIMINAL AND/OR CIVIL ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME CLAIMS AND CRIMINAL COUNTS AGAINST THE DEFENDANTS – TOLLED FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT.  SHARON BRIDGEWATER HAS BE MENTALLY INCAPACITY DUE TO THE VIOLENCE, ASSAULTS, RAPE, CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT GENOCIDE, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, ILLEGAL UNLAWFUL “IMPRISONMENT( “HELD TO A WARRANT OF ARREST,” WITNESS TAMPERING IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S. Code § 1512, RETALIATION AGAINST A FEDERAL WITNESS AND VICTIM 18 U.S. Code § 1513, ILLEGAL CRIMINAL, INTERFERENCE WITH COMMERCE BY THREAT AND/OR VIOLENCE IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1951 AND MULTIPLE OTHER RACKETEERING PREDICATE ACTS AS DEFINED IN 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1961 AGAINST BOTH SHARON AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER(BUSINESS, PERSON AND/OR PROPERTY) AND/OR THE U.S.A. IN VIOLATION OF AND/OR THE DEFENDANTS CLASS STATUTORY REPRESENATIVES HAVE BEEN ABSENT FROM THE JURISDICTION OF MICHIGAN AND SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES PREVENT BRIDGEWATER FROM FILING THE CLAIM PROMPTLY.

RETROACTIVE ADJUDICATION(AUGUST 1, 2008), DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AND BURIFICATION BILATERAL CLASS CERTIFICATION OF REPRESENTATIVES & “STATUTORY RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT – FOREIGN TERRORIST ORGANIZATION CLASS ACTION CERTIFICATION” WITH WRITS OF QUO WARRANTO(PURSUANT TO D.C. CODE SECTION 16-3501 AND/OR CALIFORNIA CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE 801-811)

(U.S. MARSHALL – COMMON LAW PROCESS AND RETURN FORM) 4) RETROACTIVE ADJUDICATION AND CONVICTION, SENTENCE(Bifurcated trial adjudication of guilt and/or sentence and punishment and liability of damages and forfeiture of all assets(FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT(S)

CRIMINAL FORFEITURE TO THE “50 STATES” EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR QUI TAM RELATOR -PURSUANT TO ONE OR MORE 18 U.S. Code § 982,

“SAVING TO SUITORS” CLAUSE

SHARON BRIDGEWATER(ON BEHALF OF MYSELF, MY SON(TWO WITNESSES), ALL U.S. CITIZENS & “HUMANITY”)- A PERSON WHO HAS EXHAUSTED ALL AVAILABLE REMEDIES AND HAVE NO OTHER ADEQUATE REMEDIES AT LAW) VIA THE “50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR QUI TAM RELATOR. The Judiciary Act of 1789 declared that the federal District Courts have exclusive jurisdiction over causes of admiralty and maritime matters(SECTION 2. Clause 1. The Judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;—to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls;—to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction; to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;—to Controversies between two or more States; between a State and Citizens of another State; between Citizens of different States,—between Citizens of the same State claiming Land under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects).  However, the Act also includes the saving to suitor’s clause of 28 U.S.C.S. § 1333.  The clause allows a party to pursue a remedy for a maritime claim in a state court when entitled to such remedy.  Also it allows a Plaintiff/Claimant to pursue an in personam maritime claim in an ordinary civil action seeking a common-law remedy(A PERSON WITH NO ADEQUATE REMEDIES AT LAW AND/OR A PERSON DENIED AND/OR DEPRIVED U.S. CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AS DEFINED IN 18 U.S.C. SECTION 241 AND/OR 18 U.S.C. SECTION 242) with the right to a jury trial.  Maritime tort claims may accordingly be brought in state court pursuant to the clause, the clause allows plaintiffs to bring a personal action against an individual defendant seeking common law remedies.

THIS ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME COURT HAS ALL POWERS NECESSARY FOR THE EXERCISE OF ITS JURISDICTION AND THE ENFORCEMENT OF ITS LAWFUL ORDERS, INCLUDING AUTHORITY TO ISSUE THE WRITS NCECESSARY OR PROPER IN AID OF ITS JURISDICTION PURSUANT TO THE ALL WRITS ACT 28 USC SECTION 1651

NO RIGHT TO A JURY TRIAL

Under U.S. law, there is no right to a jury trial in cases brought under admiralty and maritime law; this means that disputes arising in maritime matters are typically decided by a judge alone(IN THIS CASE – THE “50 STATES” EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR QUI TAM RELATOR), not a jury, due to the historical nature of admiralty courts which traditionally did not utilize juries.

ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME FORFEITURE ALL RIGHTS,

, TITLE AND INTEREST IN REAL PROPERTY AND/OR PUBLIC AND CORPORATE OFFICES INCLUDING THE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT, THE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, THE OFFICES OF U.S. CONGRESSMAN AND U.S. REPRESENTATIVES, THE OFFICES OF THE U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES )VIA THE RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATION ACT(RICO)

Rule C. In Rem Actions: Special Provisions

(1) When Available. An action in rem may be brought:

(a) To enforce any maritime lien; (b) Whenever a statute of the United States provides for a maritime action in rem or a proceeding analogous thereto. Except as otherwise provided by law a party who may proceed in rem may also, or in the alternative, proceed in personam against any person who may be liable. Statutory provisions exempting vessels or other property owned or possessed by or operated by or for the United States from arrest or seizure are not affected by this rule. When a statute so provides, an action against the United States or an instrumentality thereof may proceed on in rem principles(THE RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATION ACT- ALLOW THIS COURT TO PROCEED AGAINST DONALD TRUMP AND CO-CONSPIRATORS VIA THIS VERIFIED AFFIDIVANT AND COMPLAINT

(2) Complaint. In an action in rem the complaint must:

(a) be verified;

(b) describe with reasonable particularity the property that is the subject of the action; and

(c) state that the property is within the district or will be within the district while the action is pending.

(3) Judicial Authorization and Process.

(a) Arrest Warrant.

(i) The court must review the complaint and any supporting papers. If the conditions for an in rem action appear to exist, the court must issue an order directing the clerk to issue a warrant for the arrest of the vessel or other property that is the subject of the action.

(ii) If the plaintiff or the plaintiff’s attorney certifies that exigent circumstances make court review impracticable, the clerk must promptly issue a summons and a warrant for the arrest of the vessel or other property that is the subject of the action. The plaintiff has the burden in any post-arrest hearing under Rule E(4)(f) to show that exigent circumstances existed. (b) Service.

(i) If the property that is the subject of the action is a vessel or tangible property on board a vessel, the warrant and any supplemental process must be delivered to the marshal for service. (ii) If the property that is the subject of the action is other property, tangible or intangible, the warrant and any supplemental process must be delivered to a person or organization authorized to enforce it, who may be: (A) a marshal; (B) someone under contract with the United States; (C) someone specially appointed by the court for that purpose; or, (D) in an action brought by the United States, any officer or employee of the United States. 

Exigent Circumstance pursuant to Supplimental rule B in this criminal proceeding(writs of attachment[body], ARREST WARRANTS[FOR ALL TANGIBLE AND/OR INTANGLE PROERTY], DEATH WARRANTS AND IMMEDIATE EXECUTION(SEE JUDGMENT, SENTENCE, “NO STAYS” FOR DEATH WARRANT AND/OR EXECUTION) of one or more Donald Trump, Elon Musk, Pam Bondi, Kamala Harris, McHenry, Merrick Garland Statutory Defendant Class Representatives”(aka the “Satanic Adolf Hitler Nazi[“literally”)illegal alien Foreign Terrorist illegal immigration Enterprise”” adjudicated guilty of 55 Billion counts of conspiracy and violations of Nuremberg Code(War Crimes, Genocide, etc.) for using fraud, coercion, and/or force VIA A “SHAM” COV-19 “PLANDEMIC” on “humanity” to intravenously inject with a “DNA/GENO PERMANENT ALTERATION,” HIV/AIDS BIOWEAPON OF MASS DESTRUCTION- ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE(MISSION TO EXTRICATE ITSELF FOR HUMAN CONTROL-AND DESTROY MEN AND WOMEN CREATED IN THE IMAGE OF GOD) – NANO-TECH. TO LINK MEN WITH COMPUTER(AND MAKE MEN TRANSHUMAN) AND FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE TO BUY, SELL, ENSLAVE AND CONTROL, AND FOR THE FINAL BATTLE ARMAGEDDON (SEE BELOW CONSOLIDATED INTERVENTION AS A MATTER OF RIGHT)

An emergency situation requiring swift action to prevent imminent danger to life or serious damage to property, or to forestall the imminent escape of a suspect, or continued destruction of evidence.

    THE U.S.A. – TRUMP(THE PRESIDENT ET AL) AND KAMALA HARRIS ET AL WAIVE SOVERIEGN IMMUNITY UNDER ADMIRALTY AND/OR MARITIME LAW AND CONSENT TO BE SUED!

THE PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP(SEE INTERVENTION BELOW) ADJUDICATED GUILTY AS CHARGED FOR “CONTINUING” ENGAGING IN A PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY AND CONSPIRACY FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT (TREASON, CONCEALING KNOWN FACTS THEY WERE UNDER A DUTY TO DISCLOSE & GRANTING CHINA SUPREME AUTHORITY OVER THE U.S.A., COMMITTING TERRORIST ACTS AGAINST U.S. CITIZENS, IMMIGRATION OFFENSES, NATIONAL SECURITY VIOLATIONS, CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT GENOCIDE, WAR CRIMES AND OTHER HENIOUS ACT)IN THIS LAWFUL ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME COURT

THE RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATION(RICO) NEXUS

The nexus requirement in the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act is the connection between a racketeering activity and the affairs of an enterprise. – ALL ARE CONNECTED, THE FINANCIAL SYSTEM(U.S. FEDERAL RESERVE – ALL GLOBAL CENTRAL BANKS, BRICS, BTICOIN, THE “WORLD-INTERNATIONAL STOCK MARKETS”), INTERNET OF THINGS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE “THE NEW ELECTRICTY” INTERTWINED AND RELATED, ENGAGED IN, OR ACTIVITIES OF WHICH AFFECT INTERSTATE AND FOREIGN COMMERCE

______________________________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________________________

COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL IN THIS CASE – JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF IN RE THE “50 STATES” EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR QUI TAM RELATOR VS. AGAINST DEFENDANT KAMALA HARRIS, MERRICK GARLAND AND SUCCESSOR[S]PAM BONDI, Acting Attorney General James McHenry  (AND PREDECESSORS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO THERE TERM) – ON BEHALF OF JOE BIDEN (AND PREDECESSORS DONALD TRUMP, BARRY SOERTOES[AKA BARAK H. OBAMA], GEORGE H. BUSH, GEORGE W. BUSH AND WILLIAM BILL CLINTON, ALL U.S. LEGISLATORS AND JUDICIAL BRANCH )CONSPIRING TO ENGAGE IN A PATTERN OF RACKEETEERING ACTIVITY.  RICO explicitly authorizes the Government SHARON BRIDGEWATER VIA THE “50 STATES” EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR QUI TAM RELATOR) to invoke collateral estoppel to prove its civil RICO charges, and provides as follows: A final judgment or decree rendered in favor of the United States in any criminal proceeding brought by the United States under this chapter shall estop the defendant from denying the essential allegations of the criminal offense in any subsequent civil proceeding brought by the United States. Collateral estoppel “means simply that when an issue of ultimate fact has once been determined by a valid and final judgment, that issue cannot again be litigated between the same parties in any future lawsuit.” Ashe v. Swenson, 397 U.. 436, 443 (1970).

The federal government(TRUMP, MUSK, BIDEN, HARRIS, ETC.) may not interfere with “the 50 States,” rights and/or interfere and/or violate the “50 States” ex rel Sharon Bridgewater Private Attorney General and/or Qui Tam Relator US Constitutional rights.    The 9^TH AMENDMENT and/or the The 10th Amendment in pertinent part states:

“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”  The Constitution delegated few, enumerated powers to the Federal Government, reserving all remaining powers to the States and the people., and States are Soveriegn.   “Each state retains its sovereignty, freedom, and independence, and every power, jurisdiction, and right, which is not by this Confederation expressly delegated to the United States, in Congress assembled.”  The Tenth Amendment assures that we, the people of the United States of America and each sovereign state in the Union of States, now have, and have always had, rights the federal government may not usurp. Article IV, Section 4 says, “The United States shall guarantee to every state in this Union a republican form of government…..”, and the Ninth Amendment states that…”The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.”  

ALL TRUMP’S 2025 EXECUTIVE ORDERS INCLUDING “TRUMP’S PROJECT 2025” ARE NULL AND VOID AND WITHOUT ANY LEGAL EFFECT[SEE THIS SITE], ALL APPOINTEES, NOMINATIONS, CONFIRMATION VIA THE 2025 TRUMP ADMINSTRATION – NULL AND VOID AND WITHOUT ANY LEGAL EFFECT[SEE RETROACTIVE ADJUDICATION AND/OR DECLARATORY ADJUDICATION[ALL SENTENCE TO DEATH FOR THEIR HENIOUS ACTS AGAINST SHARON AND/OR JAMES AND HUMANTIY!!

KAMALA DEVI HARRIS INDIVIDUALLY AND/OR IN ALL OF HER OFFICIAL CAPACITIES AS AN EMPLOYEE OF THE U.S.A. GOVERNMENT(FROM JAN 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO 2004), IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA(FROM 2004 TO 2011), OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL  FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA(FROM 2011-2016) SENATOR FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA(JAN. 3, 2017 THRU TO JANUARY 18, 2021)AND OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA(FROM 2021 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT) CLASS REPRESENTATIVE ON BEHALF OF Pamela Jo Bondi individually and in her official capacity as Florida Attorney General from 2011 thru to 2019, & Merrick Garland individually and in his official capacity as Chief Judge for D.C. Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, and SUCCESSIVE CAPACITIES “STATUTORY” “DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE” CLASS MEMBER CO-CONSPIRATOR ) , IMPEACHMENT(WITH WRIT OF SUMMONS), REMOVAL “OUSTED FROM THE OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA, RETROACTIVE ARREST WARRANT – ADJUDICATED GUILTY(RETROACTIVE IMPEACHMENT OF KAMALA HARRIS IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SAN FRANCISCO DISTRICT ATTORNEY(AUGUST 1, 2008) AND/OR SUCCESSIVE CAPACITIES)[CLASS ACTION “RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATION” STATUTORY REPRESENTATIVE(IT IS RETROACTIVELY ORDERED, ADJUDICATED AND DECREED, THAT KAMALA DEVI HARRIS INDIVIDUALLY AND/OR IN ALL OF HER OFFICIAL CAPACITIES AS AN EMPLOYEE OF THE U.S.A. GOVERNMENT(FROM JAN 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO 2004), IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA(FROM 2004 TO 2011), OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL  FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA(FROM 2011-2016) SENATOR FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA(JAN. 3, 2017 THRU TO JANUARY 18, 2021)AND OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA(FROM 2021 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT) CLASS REPRESENTATIVE ON BEHALF OF Pamela Jo Bondi individually and in her official capacity as Florida Attorney General from 2011 thru to 2019, & Merrick Garland individually and in his official capacity as Chief Judge for D.C. Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, and SUCCESSIVE CAPACITIES AND ALL “STATUTORY” CLASS MEMBERS ) DISQUALIFED AND INELIGIBLE FOR ONE OR MORE REASONS 2)FROM PROSECUTING ANY AND ALL HAYES VALLEY LIMITED PARTNESHIP DEFENDANTS BECAUSE THEY HAD AND CONTINUE TO HAVE A PERSONAL OR POLITICAL RELATIONSHIP WITH HAYES VALLEY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP “AKA PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP) AND ASSOICATED AND/OR EMPLOYED BY A “FOREIGN TERRORIST RACKETEERING ENTERPRISE” AND/OR ARE ILLEGAL ALIEN IMMIGRATES – U.S. CITIZENSHIP RETROACTIVELY REVOKED FOR CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT TERRORIST ACTS AGAINST SHARON AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER(ALL U.S. CITIZENS) AND/OR TREASON.

RETROACTIVE ADJUDICATION AND DECLARATORY JUDGMENT- BILATERAL BURIFICATION OF CLASS REPRESENTATIVE(S)KAMALA HARRIS IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SAN FRANCISCO DISTRICT ATTORNEY[PROSECUTOR] RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATION(RICO) FOREIGN TERRORIST CLASS-ACTION REPRESENTATIVE VS. (SEE SHARON BRIDGEWATER VIA THE “50 STATES” EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR QUI TAM RELATOR INTERVENTION AS A MATTER OF RIGHT – LEGAL DEFINITION

CLICK HERE TO BE REDIRECTED BACK TO CRIMINAL/CIVIL TRIAL