PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE CIVIL PROCEDURE RULE 8 (a) [AND/OR CALIFORNIA CIVIL RULE OF PROCEDURE AND/OR LOCAL RULE] Joinder of Offenses AND/OR DEFENDANTS an indictment or information may charge a defendant in separate counts with 2 or more offenses if the offenses charged—whether felonies or misdemeanors or both—are of the same or similar character, or are based on the same act or transaction, or are connected with or constitute parts of a common scheme or plan. Rule 8(b)states: an indictment or information may join 2 or more defendants if they are alleged to have participated in the same act or transaction, or in the same series of acts or transactions, constituting an offense or offenses, and may be charged in one or more counts together or separately, and all defendants need not be charged in each count.
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FILED BY BRIDEWATER -erroneously – ERRONEOUSLY DISMISSED(AND ALL 50 OR MORE COMPLAINTS, ALL MOTIONS DENIED, JUDICIAL RACKETEERING(OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE IN VIOLATION OF THE RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATION ACT. PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE AND/OR CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE RULE OF PROCEDURE EVERY LITIGANT IS PROVIDED TO FILE A FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AS A MATTER OF RIGHT HOWEVER, BRIDGEWATER WAS DENIED HER RIGHT TO FILE A FIRST AMDNED COMPLAINT IN ALL STATE, FEDERAL, APPELLANT AND/OR THE U.S. SUPREME COURT) BRIDGEWATER A VICTIM OF “MAIL FRAUD, WIRE FRAUD, VIOLENT CRIMES IN AID OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY AND MULTIPLE OTHER RICO CRIME BY PAM BONDI AND KAMALA HARRIS AND OTHERS “RICO CONSPIRACY” LIBELED A vexatious litigant FROM ON OR AUGUST 8, 2008 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT(SEE AFFIDIVANT BELOW)
FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT AND/OR WILLFUL OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1503
Plaintiff had no knowledge of this combination and conspiracy of any fact that might have led to the discovery of it prior to the institution of proceedings in this court today. Plaintiff could not have discovered the alleged combination and conspiracy at an earlier date by the exercise of reasonable diligence since the combination and conspiracy had been fraudulently concealed by defendants by various means and methods, including the holding of secret meetings, obstruction of congressional investigations, By virtue of this fraudulent concealment, the operation or running of any applicable statute or period of limitations affecting plaintiff’s cause of action in this action was suspended or tolled during the period of concealment.. Further the Plaintiff has been under a legal disability since Jan. 1, 1993 and continuing thru present(and/or in addition when the U.S. is involved no statue of limitation applies, even further the Defendants all acted in joint participation and/or conspired obstructed Justices by willfully, intentionally using force, violence and committing criminal acts of Genocide, etc. against Bridgewater and dismissing Bridgewater lawful claims in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1503 “a pattern of racketeering activity”) and this also tolls the statute of limitation.
