“DRAGON,” THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION – MARXIST TERRORIST DR. TEDROS ADHANOM GHEBREYESUS PRESIDENT – MARXIST TERRORIST) BIDEN, HARRIS, OBAMA, TRUMP, GARLAND, ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, “THE BRITISH ROYALS,” BORIS JOHNSON, IMMANUEL MACRON, ANGELA MERKEL, “THE POPE,” THE ROTHCHILD’S, V. PUTIN, ALL MAJOR CORPORATIONS ET AL TO DEFRAUD THE U.S.A. IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 371 AND/OR THE TWO WITNESSES-SEE BELOW)

(SEE REVELATION 12 – ALSO SEE AMERICA JUDGED ON THIS WEBSITE– SEPTEMBER 23, 2017) BEFORE, BIDEN, HARRIS, ET AL “TO GATHER THE FLOCK IN THIS GREAT AND FINAL EXODUS.

SHARON BRIDGEWATER VIA “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTOREY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR(LADY OF JUSTICE – THE ONLY PERSON IN THE WORLD GRANTED AUTHORITY BY GOD IN HEAVEN TO PROSECUTE(AND STANDING) THE “CORONAVIRUS BIOWEAPONS CRIMINAL GANG FOR THEIR HEINOUS CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY, TREASON AND OTHER CRIMES.

HUMANITY – WHERE ALL OTHERS HAVE ATTEMPTED AND DO NOT HAVE LEGAL AUTHORITY AND/OR STANDING TO PROSECUTE THEIR CRIMES COMM AND COLLECT DAMAGES ON BEHALF OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERMENT “LITERALLY”) AS FOLLOWS:

THE LAW!!

JUDGE, JURY AND EXECUTOR“(WITH FULL POWER AND AUTHORITY TO JUDGE AND PUNISH ALL U.S. PUBLIC OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, MAJOR CORPORATIONS OFFICERS, DIRECTORS, ETC. FOREIGN OFFICIALS “THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TERRORIST GANG” UNILATERALLY) TO COLLECT ALL MONEY AND/OR PROPERTY SCHEME TO DEFRAUD THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IT DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 371 THE TWO WITNESSES AND FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT AND TO PROSECUTE, PREVENT, RESTRAIN AND/OR ENJOIN BIDEN, HARRIS FROM GRANTING CHINA U.S. NATIONAL SOVERIGNTY, PREVENT, RESTRAIN AND ENJOIN FURTHER ATTACKS ON OUR STATE CAPITOL IN WASHINGTON D.C., TO RESTRAIN, PREVENT AND/OR ENJOIN BIDEN, HARRIS, ET AL FROM OPENING OUR U.S. BORDERS AND ALLOWING “ALL IMMIGRATES INTO AMERICA.” PREVENT AND ENJOIN FROM – THE COV-19 EXPERIMENTAL INJECTION, VIOLATIONS OF THE NUMBERG CODE, AND HIS PREDESSCOR DONALD TRUMP(AND PREDESSCORS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THUR TO THEIR TERM(S) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO)AND TO ONE OR MORE RETROACTIVE IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL FROM OFFICE-VIA “RICO FORFEITURE OF OFFICE,” DISSOVLE AND REORGANIZE THE U.S. GOVERNMENT PURSUANT TO THE RICO ACT AND THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE)AND TO PROSECUTE TO THE FULLEST EXTENT ACCORDING TO APPLICABLE LAW FOR FIVE HUNDRED OR MORE CRIMES FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUNING THRU TO PRESENT(THE STATUE OF LIMITATIONS IS TOLLED DUE TO THE CRIMINAL ACTS OF CONTINUAL OPPRESSION AND/OR VIOLENCE COMMITTED AGAINST SHARON BRIDGEWATER BUSINESS, PERSON OR PROPERTY(“THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR”) WHICH IS THE PRIMARY AND DIRECT CAUSE BRIDGEWATER “MENTAL DISABILITY OF DEPRESSION” FROM JAN. 1, 1993 THRU TO PRESENT(“LABELED” DISABLED AS DEFINED IN THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT TREASONCOMES NOW “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR AND INVOKE MY COMMON LAW RIGHT AND/OR POWER PURUSANT TO 28 U.S. Code § 566 – Powers and duties of the U.S. MARSHALL(AND/OR APPOINT AUTHORIZED INDIVIDUALS AND/ORG U.S. CITIZENS)to execute, and enforce all orders of this common law court as provided by Admiralty and/or Maritime common law “remedies.” To execute all lawful writs, process, and orders issued under the authority of “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR (AND COMMAND ALL NECESSARY ASSISTANCE TO EXECUTE MY DUTIES AS PROSECUTOR) the United States, and shall command all necessary assistance to execute its duties.

(

THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT WAIVES IMMUNITY AND CONSENT TO BE SUE VIA “BREACH OF CONTRACTS” IN ADMIRALTY AND/OR MARITIME LAW(AS IN THE CASE ENTITLED SHARON BRIDGEWATER VS. HAYES VALLEY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP – A PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP -BREACH OF CONTRACT, GROSS NEGLIENCE AND FRAUD – SEE BELOW) – CLICK HERE-

COMES NOW SHARON BRIDGEWATER(ON BEHALF OF MY SELF, MY SON, ALL U.S. CITIZENS – “PEOPLE OF THE 50 STATES”) VIA”THE 50 UNITED STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR AND INVOKE MY COMMON LAW POWER AND PROVIDE TO THE PEOPLE OF THE 50 STATES THIS COMMON LAW COURT VIA ONE OR MORE PUBLIC LIBRARY, THIS WEBSITE AND/OR OTHER COMMON LAW MEANS!!

COMES NOW SHARON BRIDGEWATER(ON BEHALF OF MY SELF, MY SON, ALL U.S. CITIZENS – “PEOPLE OF THE 50 STATES” AND/OR HUMANITY) VIA”THE 50 UNITED STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR AND INVOKE MY COMMON LAW RIGHT AND “ACT” AS AN INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT(ICC) VIA ADMIRALITY AND MARITIME LAW, AND ACTS AS AN “INTERNATIONAL PROSECUTOR,”( TO PROSECUTE MR. KARIM KHAN FROM THE UNITED KINGDOM(AND CO-CONSPIRATORS ICC AND/OR “GLOBAL PROSECUTORS” FOR THEIR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE BORIS JOHNSON AND OTHER CO-CONSPIRATORS – FOR A CRIMINAL COMPLAINT RECEIVE VIA THE COV-19 INJECTIONS- SEE BELOW) HEADS OF STATE, PRIME MINISTERS ETC. FOR ONE OR MORE GENOCIDE, WAR CRIMES, CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY AND/OR AGAINST BOTH SHARON BRIDGEWATER AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER FOR THEIR ACTS OR OMISSIONS WITH THE COV-19 INJECTION( EXPERIMENTAL COV-19 INJECTION IN VIOLATION OF TEN OR

MORE NUREMBERG CODE FOR CENSORSHIP OF BOTH WITNESSES AND/OR HUMANITY)

KNOWINGLY, INTENTIONALLY, AND TO IMPOSE CRIMINAL SENTENCES AND/OR TO “ACT” AS A LAST RESORT COURT TO PROSECUTE THE MOST HEINOUS OFFENSES IN THIS CASE, WHERE “ALL NATIONAL COURTS FAIL TO ACT(AND/OR IN WHICH JURISDICTION EXTENDS TO OFFENSES THAT OCCURRED AFTER JULY 1, 2002, THAT WERE COMMITTED IN A STATE THAT HAS RATIFIED AN AGREEMENT WITH THE ICC OR BY A NATIONAL OF SUCH A STATE)!!”

COMES NOW SHARON BRIDGEWATER(ON BEHALF OF MY SELF, MY SON, ALL U.S. CITIZENS – “PEOPLE OF THE 50 STATES”) VIA”THE 50 UNITED STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR FILES THIS NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS COUNSEL FOR “THE 50 STATES AND/OR THE PEOPLE OF THE 50 STATES”

                                                      NUNC PRO TUNC

due to U.S. Government[Transnational and/or National Corporations and Public Officials their individuals capacities acting in joint participation discriminating against one and/or two witnesses based on race, class, disability, religion, socioeconomic status under the color of law, committing criminal acts against their business, person or property and/or defrauding,  & willful, U.S. Constitutional rights and violation of deprivation of human rights in violation of the declaration of human rightsand U.S. Constitutional rights ),

WHICH MEAN, “now for then,” and refers to changing back to an earlier date of an order, judgment or filing of a document. Such a retroactive re-dating requires a court order which can be obtained by a showing that the earlier date would have been legal, and there was error, accidental omission or neglect which has caused a problem or inconvenience which can be cured. Often the judge will grant the nunc pro tunc order ex parte (with only the applicant appearing and without notice). 

COMES NOW SHARON BRIDGEWATER VIA “THE UNITED STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER WITH ARTICLE III STANDING, AND INVOKE MY RIGHT TO ACT AS A PROSECUTOR(SEE BELOW DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AND SUMMARY ADJUFICATION ENTITLED “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR VS. MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL) PURSUANT TO THE RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATION, WHICH PERMITS A PRIVATE PERSON INJURED AND DAMAGE BY RACKETEERING ENTERPRISE TO ACT AS PROSECUTOR. IN ADDITION “THE 50 UNITED STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR PURSUANT TO ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME LAW “INVOKE MY JUDICIAL POWERS PURSUANT TO ARTICLE III, SECTION 2 OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION(“THE JUDICIAL POWER”OF THE UNITED STATES[ “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR”] SHALL EXTEND TO ALL CASES OF ADMIRALTY AND/OR MARITIME JURISDICTION)PURSUANT TO THE SUPREMACY OF COMMON LAW REMEDIES VIA ADMIRALTY AND/OR MARITIME LAW, ALSO INVOKE “THE ALL WRITS ACT PURSUANT TO PURSUANT  28 U.S.C. § 1651, AND ISSUE WRITS NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE IN AID OF THIS ADMIRALTY AND/OR MARITIME TIME “COMMON LAW” ARREST WARRANTS, FORFEITURE, ETC.

JUDGE, JURY AND EXECUTOR“(WITH FULL POWER AND AUTHORITY TO JUDGE AND PUNISH ALL U.S. PUBLIC OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, MAJOR CORPORATIONS OFFICERS, DIRECTORS, ETC. FOREIGN OFFICIALS “THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TERRORIST GANG” UNILATERALLY) TO COLLECT ALL MONEY AND/OR PROPERTY SCHEME TO DEFRAUD THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IT DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 371 THE TWO WITNESSES AND FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT AND TO PROSECUTE, PREVENT, RESTRAIN AND/OR ENJOIN BIDEN, HARRIS FROM GRANTING CHINA U.S. NATIONAL SOVERIGNTY, PREVENT, RESTRAIN AND ENJOIN FURTHER ATTACKS ON OUR STATE CAPITOL IN WASHINGTON D.C., TO RESTRAIN, PREVENT AND/OR ENJOIN BIDEN, HARRIS, ET AL FROM OPENING OUR U.S. BORDERS AND ALLOWING “ALL IMMIGRATES INTO AMERICA.” PREVENT AND ENJOIN FROM – THE COV-19 EXPERIMENTAL INJECTION, VIOLATIONS OF THE NUMBERG CODE, AND HIS PREDESSCOR DONALD TRUMP(AND PREDESSCORS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THUR TO THEIR TERM(S) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO)AND TO ONE OR MORE RETROACTIVE IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL FROM OFFICE-VIA “RICO FORFEITURE OF OFFICE,” DISSOVLE AND REORGANIZE THE U.S. GOVERNMENT PURSUANT TO THE RICO ACT AND THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE)AND TO PROSECUTE TO THE FULLEST EXTENT ACCORDING TO APPLICABLE LAW FOR FIVE HUNDRED OR MORE CRIMES FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUNING THRU TO PRESENT(THE STATUE OF LIMITATIONS IS TOLLED DUE TO THE CRIMINAL ACTS OF CONTINUAL OPPRESSION AND/OR VIOLENCE COMMITTED AGAINST SHARON BRIDGEWATER BUSINESS, PERSON OR PROPERTY(“THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR”) WHICH IS THE PRIMARY AND DIRECT CAUSE BRIDGEWATER “MENTAL DISABILITY OF DEPRESSION” FROM JAN. 1, 1993 THRU TO PRESENT(“LABELED” DISABLED AS DEFINED IN THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT TREASONCOMES NOW “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR AND INVOKE MY COMMON LAW RIGHT AND/OR POWER PURUSANT TO 28 U.S. Code § 566 – Powers and duties of the U.S. MARSHALL(AND/OR APPOINT AUTHORIZED INDIVIDUALS AND/ORG U.S. CITIZENS)to execute, and enforce all orders of this common law court as provided by Admiralty and/or Maritime common law “remedies.” To execute all lawful writs, process, and orders issued under the authority of “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR (AND COMMAND ALL NECESSARY ASSISTANCE TO EXECUTE MY DUTIES AS PROSECUTOR) the United States, and shall command all necessary assistance to execute its duties.

(

THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT WAIVES IMMUNITY AND CONSENT TO BE SUE VIA “BREACH OF CONTRACTS” IN ADMIRALTY AND/OR MARITIME LAW(AS IN THE CASE ENTITLED SHARON BRIDGEWATER VS. HAYES VALLEY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP – A PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP -BREACH OF CONTRACT, GROSS NEGLIENCE AND FRAUD – SEE BELOW) – CLICK HERE-

COMES NOW SHARON BRIDGEWATER(ON BEHALF OF MY SELF, MY SON, ALL U.S. CITIZENS – “PEOPLE OF THE 50 STATES”) VIA”THE 50 UNITED STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR AND INVOKE MY COMMON LAW POWER AND PROVIDE TO THE PEOPLE OF THE 50 STATES THIS COMMON LAW COURT VIA ONE OR MORE PUBLIC LIBRARY, THIS WEBSITE AND/OR OTHER COMMON LAW MEANS!!

COMES NOW SHARON BRIDGEWATER(ON BEHALF OF MY SELF, MY SON, ALL U.S. CITIZENS – “PEOPLE OF THE 50 STATES” AND/OR HUMANITY) VIA”THE 50 UNITED STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR AND INVOKE MY COMMON LAW RIGHT AND “ACT” AS AN INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT(ICC) VIA ADMIRALITY AND MARITIME LAW, AND ACTS AS AN “INTERNATIONAL PROSECUTOR,”( TO PROSECUTE MR. KARIM KHAN FROM THE UNITED KINGDOM(AND CO-CONSPIRATORS ICC AND/OR “GLOBAL PROSECUTORS” FOR THEIR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE BORIS JOHNSON AND OTHER CO-CONSPIRATORS – FOR A CRIMINAL COMPLAINT RECEIVE VIA THE COV-19 INJECTIONS- SEE BELOW) HEADS OF STATE, PRIME MINISTERS ETC. FOR ONE OR MORE GENOCIDE, WAR CRIMES, CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY AND/OR AGAINST BOTH SHARON BRIDGEWATER AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER FOR THEIR ACTS OR OMISSIONS WITH THE COV-19 INJECTION( EXPERIMENTAL COV-19 INJECTION IN VIOLATION OF TEN OR

MORE NUREMBERG CODE FOR CENSORSHIP OF BOTH WITNESSES AND/OR HUMANITY)

KNOWINGLY, INTENTIONALLY, AND TO IMPOSE CRIMINAL SENTENCES AND/OR TO “ACT” AS A LAST RESORT COURT TO PROSECUTE THE MOST HEINOUS OFFENSES IN THIS CASE, WHERE “ALL NATIONAL COURTS FAIL TO ACT(AND/OR IN WHICH JURISDICTION EXTENDS TO OFFENSES THAT OCCURRED AFTER JULY 1, 2002, THAT WERE COMMITTED IN A STATE THAT HAS RATIFIED AN AGREEMENT WITH THE ICC OR BY A NATIONAL OF SUCH A STATE)!!”

ARTICLE III, SECTION III OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION, STATES TREASON AGAINST THE UNITED STATES, SHALL CONSIST ONLY IN LEVYING WAR AGAINST THEM OR ADHERING TO THEIR ENEMIES, GIVING AID AND COMFORT. NO PERSON SHALL BE CONVICTED OF TREASON UNLESS ON THE TESTIMONY WITNESSES TO THE SAME OVERT ACT OR ON CONFESSION IN OPEN COURT. COMES NOW TWO WITNESSES AND/OR “THE 50 UNITED STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR TESTIFIES AND/OR CONFESSES IN OPEN COURT THAT PRESIDENT BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS, ALL U.S. PUBLIC OFFICIALS ARE GUILTY OF ONE OR MORE:

TREASON IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S. Code § 2381
MISPRISION OF TREASON IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S. Code § 2382
MISPRISION OF FELONY IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S. Code § 4
SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S. Code § 2384
RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION
VIOLENT CRIMES IN ADI OF RACKETEERING ACTITY IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S. Code § 1959
BRIBERY OF PUBLIC OFFICIALS AND/OR WITNESSES IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S. Code § 201
and a host of other unlawful felonious & racketeering acts(too many to name) including
REBELLION OR INSURRECTION 18 U.S. Code § 2383

AND FORFEITS ALL “U.S.A. PUBLIC OFFICES” AND/OR ARE DISQUALIFIED FROM HOLDING FUTURE PUBLIC OFFICE(SEE BELOW)!!

NOTICE OF OF ADJUFICATION AND DISSOLUTION OF THE U.S. GOVERNMENT(PUBLIC EMPLOYEES ) “RACKETEERING ENTERPRIZE AND RE-ORGANIZATION

COMES NOW SHARON BRIDGEWATER VIA “THE UNITED STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER WITH ARTICLE III STANDING, AND INVOKE MY RIGHT TO ACT AS A PROSECUTOR(SEE BELOW DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AND SUMMARY ADJUFICATION ENTITLED “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR VS. MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL) PURSUANT TO THE RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATION, WHICH PERMITS A PRIVATE PERSON INJURED AND DAMAGE BY RACKETEERING ENTERPRISE TO ACT AS PROSECUTOR. IN ADDITION “THE 50 UNITED STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR PURSUANT TO ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME LAW “INVOKE MY JUDICIAL POWERS PURSUANT TO ARTICLE III, SECTION 2 OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION(“THE JUDICIAL POWER”OF THE UNITED STATES[ “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR”] SHALL EXTEND TO ALL CASES OF ADMIRALTY AND/OR MARITIME JURISDICTION)PURSUANT TO THE SUPREMACY OF COMMON LAW REMEDIES VIA ADMIRALTY AND/OR MARITIME LAW, ALSO INVOKE “THE ALL WRITS ACT PURSUANT TO PURSUANT  28 U.S.C. § 1651, AND ISSUE WRITS NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE IN AID OF THIS ADMIRALTY AND/OR MARITIME TIME “COMMON LAW” ARREST WARRANTS, FORFEITURE, ETC.

NOTICE OF RELATED CASES

(DISMISSAL OF 42 PLUS CASES(FROM 2008 THRU TO 2019) IN VIOLATION OF BRIDGEWATER U.S. CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS -JUDICIAL RACKETEERING)

THE ACTS OR OMISSIONS BY U.S. GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL THAT WERE COMMITTED AGAINST THE TWO WITNESSES IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE DISMISSED CASES ARE ASSAULT AND BATTERY, THEFT, PERJURY, FALSE IMPRISONMENT, FALSE ARREST, FRAUD ON THE COURT, FALSE DECLARATIONS, AND A HOST OF PREDICATE ACTS AS DEFINED IN 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1961(1) WIRE FRAUD, EXTORTION UNDER THE OFFICIAL RIGHT, RETALIATION, MONEY LAUNDERING, BANK FRAUD, ABUSE OF POWER ETC. – “A PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY!!” AN EXAMPLE OF THE CRIMINAL RACKET AS FOLLOWS: THE BELOW FORM ARE “MALICIOUS” CRIMINAL CHARGES PENDING AGAINST BRIDGEWATER A WITNESS, IN REALITY THE GOVERNMENT CONSPIRED UNDER THE COLOR OF LAW, CAME ONTO BRIDGEWATER PROPERTY, BREAKING IN ENTERING, STOLE AND CONVERTED ALL BRIDGEWATER PROPERTY INCLUDING A RIFLE, APPLIANCES, COMPUTERS, BRIDGEWATER BUSINESS AND PERSONAL PROPERTY AND SUBSEQUENLY FALSELY CHARGED BRIDGEWATER WITH THEFT BY TAKING, KEPT CHARGES PENDING AGAINST BRIDGEWATER FOR TWO YEAR(FALSE IMPRISONMENT), JUST FOR THE PURPOSE TO PREVENT AGAINST BRIDGEWATER FROM SUING – AND IN RETAILATION, LATER DISMISSED(AFTER THE “SO-CALLED” STATUE LIMITATION EXPIRED! THE ACTS OR OMISSIONS OF THE CRIMINAL RACKET CONSTITUTE MALICIOUS PROSECUTION, LIBEL, ETC. ALL LAWSUITS FILED BY BRIDGEWATER AGAINST THE PERPETRATORS DISMISSED(ALL WHILE THEY WERE SIMULTANEOUSLY COMMITTING OVER CRIMES AGAINST BRIDGEWATER BUSINESS, PERSON OR PROPERTY!!

RICO CASE STATEMENT

DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

PLAINTIFF/CLAIMANT SEEKS FORFEITURE OF PROPERTY AS FOLLOW:

VICTIM ORGANIZATIONAL STATEMENT

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO ONE OR MORE

CERTIFICATION

42 USC Section, 2000a-1, 2 and/or 3

42 USC Section 2000 a-3

 42 USC Section 2000 e-2 

 42 USC section 2000d  

42  USC section 2000b

 42 USC Section 2000h-1

 42 USC Section 2000h-2

 42 USC section 2000e-2

CERTIFICATE OF INTEREST PARTIES

NOTICE OF ADJUDICATION BI-LATERAL CLASS REPRESENTATIVES AND/OR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AND ADJUDICIFATION FOR PROSECUTOR OF THE U.S.A. AND/OR “INTERNATIONAL PROSECUTOR FOR HEINOUS CRIMES AGAINST BOTH SHARON BRIDGEWATER AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER(AND HUMANITY)CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY, WAR CRIMES, GENOCIDE, VIOLATIONS OF THE NUREMBERG CODE ETC.

NOTICE OF VIDEO TELECONFERENCING FOR CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS

COMES NOW “THE 50 UNITED STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR” PURSUANT TO FEDERAL OF CIVIL PROCEDURE(FRCP)8 – GENERAL RULES OF PLEADING, FILES THIS SHORT AND PLAIN STATEMENT OF GROUNDS FOR THE COURT JURISIDICTION, SHORT AND PLAINTIFF STATEMENT SHOWING THAT THE PLEADER IS ENTITLED TO RELIEF; AND DEMAND FOR RELIEF SOUGHT AS FOLLOWS:

STATEMENT OF CLAIM

THIS IS AN ADMIRALITY OR MARITIME CLAIM FOR THE PURPOSES OF Rule 14(c), 38(e), 82 and the Supplimental Rules for Admirality or Maritime Cliams and Asset Foreiture Claim for declaratory and injunctive relief.

This criminal case has been brought by “The 50 States ex Rel Sharon Bridgewater Private Attorney general and/or Relator . I will sometimes refer to  the government as the prosecution. The government is represented at this trial by an assistant  United States attorney, [_________]. The defendant, [__________], is represented by [his/her]

The Plaintiff and/or Petitioners brings chares agains the Defendant Biden, Trump, Barak H. Obama, et al with violation of the Rackeeteereed Influenced and Corrupt Organization act for having intentionally,  _______, violation of the Numberg code.   Treason, conspired to overthrow the US Government, genocide intangle right to honest service, upursation of public office of the United States President,  and multiple other crimes which  a federal law, which is contained in under the 1^st Count of this complaint.   An Acutual contriversiy exist between Biden, Merrick Garland, Harris , the rights of the the “50 States”  Plaintiffs to books, documents, as private attorney general and standing to obtain relief,

                                                   III.

                   STRUCTURE AND INCORPORATION

                 OF  EXHIBITS

     Plaintiff hereby also incorporates the following exhibits, as if the same were set forth

      fully herein, to wit:

     Exhibit A:  US/US Mutual Defense Agreement

     Exhibit B:  International Covenant on Civil

                        and Political Rights;

     Exhibit C:  Universal Declaration of Human Rights

     Exhibit D:  International and/or Foreign(Lybia and/or Eyppt) Formal Criminal Charges

                        against Biden,Barak H. Obama and/or Hillary Clinton and/or AKA Queen Elizabeth

                        and the Pope

     Exhibit F:  Extradicition Treatries

   This Court is encouraged to use computers to access all pleadings and electronic evidence and formally incorporates Exhibits A‑1 thru  ___by reference, as if all were set forth fully here.

                     

JURISDICTION

              BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TERRORISM   nationaThis is an admirality and/or maritime claim “INTERNATIONAL – MARITIME BREACH OF CONTRACT VIA TRANSNATIONAL BUSINESSES”  THIS IS A CLAIM/CASE OF CONTRACT, TORT AND DAMAGE TO BUSINESS, PERSON OR PROPERTY PURSUANT TO THE RACKETEERED INFLUENCED CORRUPT ORGANZATION ACT(“INTERNATIONAL RACKETEERING GROUP”)AS HEREAFTER MORE FULLY APPEARS, AND IS AN ADMIRALITY AND/OR MARITIME CLAIM WITHIN THE MEANING OF RULE 9(H).(WHICH TRIGGERS THE APPLICATION OF ONE OR MORE FED.R.CIV. PROCEDURE 14(C), 38( E), AND/OR 82 OF THE SUPPLEMENTAL RULES FOR CERTAIN ADMIRALITY AND MARITIME CLAIMS(DEFENDANTS HAVE NO RIGHT TO A JURY TRIAL REGARDING CLAIMS) AND/OR IN REM-FORFEITURE ACTION. DIVERSITY OF CITIZENSHIP IS INVOKED; AS THE DEFENDANTS ARE CITIZENS(AND/OR CORPORATIONS) OF DIFFERENT STATES AND/OR COUNTRIES ases where opposing parties involved in a lawsuit are citizens of different states or countries(and against Individuals and/or Corporations owed by foreign States [see 28 U.S.C.A. 1330(a)]

                     “The court has jurisdiction of a suit suit against the foreign state, or any of its agencies or instrumentalities, is permissible where the foreign state has waived its immunity, and the purpose of the arrest is other than to obtin jurisdiction.  The foreign Sovern Immunities Act of 1976n ccompels a nonjury trial and it is error for a couse under the Act to be tried to a jury.  Such trial does not, however cause a district court to lost its  jursidction.  Corporations ownd by foreign states are considered foreign states for purposed or subject matter jurisdiction.  According, 28 U.S. C. A. section 1330(a) is the eclusive source of federal jurisction in action against corporations ownd by foreign states.

Donald Trump in his official capacity as President in his official capacity et al at all times herein mentioned, is an Corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Virginia and/or Delaware and/or Maryland with principle offices located at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC in the County of Fairfax.Trump is a citizen of Virginia, Maryland and/or Delaware and his directors, subsidiaries, affiliates, agents, servants, employees, successors, attorneys, and assigns, and any other persons or entities under his control, and each of them, and all persons and entities in active concert of participation with Trump, including but not limited to Jeff Sessions in his official capacity as United States Attorney General, John Kelly in his official capacity as Director of Homeland Security, Thomas E. Brandon in his official capacity as Acting Director of the United States Bureau  of the Alcohol, Tobacco and FireArms and Explosives(ATF), his directors, subsidiaries, affiliates, agents, servants, employees,  successors, attorneys, and assigns, and any other persons or entities under his control,  and each of them, and all persons and entities in active concert of participation  with Trump are citizens of the state of Virginia and/or Maryland and/or Delaware.

               Sharon Bridgewater and James Shannon Bridgewater are citizens of the State of Michigan.   There is an complete diverse in federal citizenship.   Sharon Bridgewater further allege  that the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000.00, exclusive of costs, expenses, interests, and fees, for purposes of invoking and establishing federal diversity of citizenship subject matter jurisdiction under Title 28 United States Code §§ 1332(a)(1),(2), and 1332(b).   This court further have jurisdiction pursuant to one or more 42 U.S.C. Sections 1983, 1985, 1986, 1988, the 5^th, 9^th, 10^th,  and/or 14^th , 42 USC Section 2000 a-1,2 and/or 3, 42 USC Section 2000e and/or 42 USC section 2000e, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and/or 2202, AND WILLFUL, INTENTIONAL DEPRIVATION OF HUMAN AND/OR U.S. CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AS DEFINED IN 18 U.S.C. 242 AND/OR 18 U.S.C. 241. This court has jurisdiction via diversity jurisdiction.  Sharon Bridgewater is a citizen of  the State of Michigan, whose address is 18592 Dale Street, Detroit, Michigan. And/or is a corporation incorporated under the laws of Michigan with its principal place of businesss in Michigan.  Jeff Sessions is a citizen of the State  of Virginia and/or Maryland and/or Delaware and/or a corporation incorporated under the laws of  State  of Virginia and/or Maryland and/or Delaware with its principal place of business in the state of State  of Virginia and/or Maryland and/or  Delaware .  CLASS ACTION FAIRNESS ACT, The  amount in controversy exceeds $75,000.00, exclusive of costs, expenses, interests, and fees, for purposes of invoking and establishing federal diversity of citizenship under one or more 28 USC section 1332 and/or  28 USC 1332(a)(1),(2), and 1332(b). This is a case of admiralty or maritime claims within the meaning of of Rule 9(h), and  this court has further jurisdiction pursuant to one or more Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act  of 1970 civil rice and/or Title 18 United States Code § §§ 1961, 1965(a), (b),(c) and/or (d); personam jurisdiction over Jeff Sessions in his official capacity as United States Attorney General, [AND RICO CONSPIRACY]

              This court also has jurisdiction  to determine the rights and/or liabilities, obligation of the disputing parties between Merrick Garland in his official capacity as U.S. Attorney General and the Plaintiff Bridgewater and/or the Committee and Oversight Government and reform.  Further jursidiction is invoked, via all writs necessary to the complete exercise of its jurisdiction” via 28 USC section 1651 “All Writs;” in rem jurisdiction via an libel action, quasa in rem jurisdiction  via a pre-existing interest in property,  and per claims arising from ownership of property(and to declare the rights and duties growing out of ownership);  jurisdiction  over theForeign officials because they have minimal contacts

with Donald Trump and/or Jeff Sessions each of whom are engaged in  Washington, engaged in

continuous, concerted, and systematic activities with plaintiffs within this district, resulting in injury to their respective interests in their business or property. This court has further jurisdiction is invoked pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sections 1983, 1985, 1986, 1988,; one or more: 42 USC Section 2000a-1, 42 USC Section 2000 a-2 , 42 USC Section 2000 a-3, 42 USC section 2000d;  one or more 2241, 2254 or 2255, Habeas Corpus Jurisdicition,  and further jurisdiction is invoked pursuant to one or more 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 28 USC sections 1333 to 1364; the  second ninth, tenth, and fourteenth amendments thereto. This Court has authority to issue a declaratory judgment and order other relief thatis just and proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 2202. Admiralty and Maritime jurisdiction within the meaning of 9(H); 28 USC 2254; 42 USC section 1985(2) and 1985(3)(Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights); 42 USC section 1986(action for neglect to prevent conspiracy);28 U.S.C. §1331, 1333 (ii) 28 U.S.C. §1343(a), and (iii) D.C. Code, Special maritime and territorial jurisdiction, extraterriorial jurisdiction, foreign corrupt practice act jurisdiction, Anti-Trust jurisdiction(Sherman Act, Clayton Act, illegal monopoly),  of the United States  for  acts committed  against the Plaintiff class  outside the jurisdiction of  “states”  with respect to  offense(s) by and/or against the the Plaintiffs a citizen of the United States;”  Alien Tort Act, one or more 15 U.S.C. §§ 78j (b) & 78ff; 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5; 18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 1343, 1344, 1346 & 2, extra-territorial jurisdicition, Special maritimes jurisdiction via crimes committed across international water and further has jurisdicition via contempts in violation of national security.  Concurrent jurisdiciton, Rome Statue International criminal court for Human rights violations. “all international crimes, and federal crimes,” Torture, Genocide, war crimes, Slavery and Peonage, crimes of aggression, “and other  international crime,” human trafficing, sexual exploitation,  in violation of international treaties, and in violation of the Declaration for human rights as signed via the United Nations.       Criminal provisions affecting, involving, or relating to the national security via  2 U.S.C. § 192 (Contempts of Congress Related to National Security and/or 8 U.S.C. § 1185(b) (Travel Controls of Citizens) and/or 18 U.S.C. § 219 et seq and further this court has matter jurisdiction over Plaintiffs’ claims under the Federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act of 1970 ( Fair Housing Act of 1968 and the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988, 42 U.S.C. Sections 3601, et seq.; (3) 42 U.S.C. Sections 1981, 1982, 1983 and 1985; and (4) 42 U.S.C. Section 1983, for violation of the First, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Eighth, Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States. (5) 15 U.S.C. Sections 1, 2, 13 and 18 for treble damages and injunctive relief for violations of the federal antitrust laws and/or 18 U.S.C. Section 1964 (c), 42 U.S.C. Section Sections 1331, and 15 U.S.C. Sections 15 and 26. U.S.C. §§ 1 and 2 et seq (Sherman Anti-Trust Act); and 15 USC §§ 15, 16, 22, 26 (Clayton Anti-Trust Act), and 1330, 1331, 1332, 1335, 1343,1345,1349,1346, FOREIGN CORRUPT PRACTICE ACT, GENOVA CONVENTIONS,  HAGUE CONVENTION, INTERNATIONAL. THIS COMMON LAW COURT HAVE ONE OR MORE IN PERSONAM JURISDICTION, IN REM JURISDICTION, QUASI IN REM JURISDICTION, EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION(“THE 50 STATES EXTENDS ITS LEGAL POWER BEYOND ITS TERRITORIAL BOUNDARIES – FOR CRIMINAL ACTS COMMITTED AGAINST THE U.S. IT’S DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 371

AND RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ONE OR MORE 18 U.S. Code § 1513 – Retaliating against a witness, victim,  for U.S. AND FOREIGN OFFICIALS JOINT PARTICIPATION IN KNOWINLY, WITH THE INTENT TO RETAILATE AGAINST BOTH SHARON AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER, AND TAKING MULTIPLE ACTIONS HARMFUL TO BOTH WITNESSES INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO INTERFERENCE WITH LAWFUL EMPLOYMENT OR LIVELIHOOD OF THE WITNESSES FOR PROVIDING TO THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS THE TRUTHFUL INFORMATION RELATING TO THE COMMISSION OF FEDERAL OFFENSES), AND/OR DIVERSITY OF CITIZENSHIP PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 28 U.S. Code § 1332 THE CONTROVERSY EXCEEDS ONE OR MORE

WAIVER OF SOVERIGN IMMUNITY AND CONSENT TO SUIT VIA “BREACH OF TRANSNATIONAL/INTENRATIONAL CONTRACT”

Defendant Biden, Harris, Merrick Garland, Donald Trump in his official capacity and/or Jeff Sessions has consented to be sued herein under the suits in admiralty act..  The federal government has waived sovereign immunity in this action and/or has consented to be sued via one or more Racketeered Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act, breach of “transnational/international” contract with both Sharon Bridgewater and/or James S. Bridgewater(see below) and/or the “Stripping doctrine” .[1]  Plaintiff and/or Claimant sue Biden, Harris, Trump, Garland, Obama and Lynch  in their official  capacities Barak H. Obama(AKA Barry Soertoes) (and predecessor) (2008- ), George W. Bush (2001- 2008), William Bill Clinton( 1993-2001),   George H. W. Bush (1989-1993) according to the context, the terms “Bush I Administration, Bush II Administration,” “Clinton Administration,” and “Obama Administration” denote, respectively, the presidential terms of office of and or, collectively, to the senior officials who comprised, from time to time, the policy-making governmental and political apparatus of each of those administrations. authority, plaintiff sues each of said defendants, in their official capacity as the acts or omissions complained of were not within the scope of such defendants’ official duties, but conspiracies under the color of federal law, and were crimes and unlawful acts outside the scope of such duties and such acts and omissions were done under color of Federal and/or State law and/or official right. in bad faith and with knowledge that their conduct violated well established and settled law; plaintiff seeks recovery for the acts and omissions of each such defendant  and from his or her personal assets, not against the government body that is (or was) such defendant’s employer at the time of the acts complained. A suit in admiralty may be brought against the United States under the Suits in Admiralty.  This complaint is further, actionable against  “ALL JUDGES,”  “co-conspirators,” Supreme Court Justices, US Federal District Court Judges, US Congressmen and US Representative, Prosecutors, under Title 42 U.S.C. 1985 (3), whose immunity does not extend to conspiracy under color of law. Section1985 (3) reaches both conspiracies under color of law and conspiracies effectuated through purely private conduct. In Ex Parte Young, 209 U.S. 123 (1908), the Supreme Court held that a state official who acted unconstitutionally could be sued in his official capacity for prospective relief. Such a suit “does not affect the State in its sovereign or governmental capacity” because the official who commits an unconstitutional act is deemed “stripped of his official or representative character. Plaintiff had no knowledge of this combination and conspiracy or of any fact that might have led to the discovery of it prior to the institution of this proceedings.

---

[1]                      Suits filed against state officials under the stripping doctrine permits a state official who used his or his or her position to act illegally to be sued in his or her individual capacity, and the  government is immune from being sued through respondeat superior.

TOLLING OF THE STATUE OF LIMITATION AND RETROACTIVE IMPLICATION(CLASS ACTION CRIMINAL PROSECUTION AND/OR CLAIM)!!

INCLUDE IN COMPLAINT – IN RE:

“THE TO UNITED STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR VS. 125 TRILLION IN CURRENCY, BITCOINT, ETC. BIDEN, HARRIS, the office of the president, the office of atttorney gneneral (ALL DEFENDANTS)ALL BOOKS, DOCUMENT IN THE POSSESSION” ARREST WARRANTS IN REM AND/OR BODY ATTACHMENTS IN PERSONMAN

III

STRUCTURE AND INCORPORATION

PRIOR PLEADINGS AND/OR EXHIBITS

Plaintiff hereby also incorporates the following exhibits, as if the same were set forth

fully herein, to wit:

     Exhibit A:  US/US Mutual Defense Agreement

     Exhibit B:  International Covenant on Civil

and Political Rights;

     Exhibit C:  Universal Declaration of Human Rights

     Exhibit E:  International and/or Foreign(Lybia and/or Eyppt) Formal Criminal Charges

                        Filed against Barak H. Obama(AKA Barry Soertoes)  and/or Hillary Clinton and/or

AKA Queen Elibeth

 Exhibit F:  Restitution  – Estimate Trillions

    Exh.      G:  ALL BI-LATERIAL/ UNLATERIAL GLOBAL AGREEMENTS(LEGALLY

                        BINDING AGREEMENTS)

     Exh.   H   Prima Facie – Proof of Rackeeteeering activity the – Class Plaintiff directly

                     damage(two Stipulated Judgment – Collection of Unlawful Debt Extortion)

    Exh. I    World Bank Is Laundering Money

This Court is encouraged to use computers to access all pleadings and electronic evidence and formally incorporates Exhibits A‑1 thru  ___by reference, as if all were set forth fully here.

DEFAULT JUDGMENT IN REM – ADMIRALITY AND/OR MARITIME CLAIMS

.  Supplemental rules for Admirality or Maritime Claims( of one or more of the following Rule A, B, C, D, E, F, G) within the meaning o of Rule 9(h) with respect to one or more of the following remededies:

• Maritime time attachment and garnishment,
• Actions in rem
• Possessory, petitory, and partition actions,

And

• Actions for exoneration from or limitation of liability
• Forfeiture arising from one or more a federal statue(18 USC 985); and/or this procedure in statutory condemnation proceedings analogous to maritime action in re

Continuing Conspiracy dating back to Woodrow Wilson(sold out America-Treason)VIA “THE FEDERAL RESERVE.

THE SCHEME

The primary cause of this action is a widespread international criminal enterpriseengaged in a pattern of racketeering activity across international and/or State lines, and a conspiracy to engage in racketeering activity involving numerous RICO predicate acts during the past ten (10)-(20) calendar years.

The predicate acts alleged here cluster around BIOGICAL WEAPONS AGAINST HUMANITY, criminal tampering with and retaliation against a qualified Federal Witness, interstate transportation of stolen property, obstruction of justice, obstruction of criminal investigations, public bombing, peonage and slavery, war crimes, crimes against humanity,  

The primary objective of the racketeering enterprisehas been to overthrow the US Government, destroy the sovereignty of the United States and/or Constitution, cheat and defraud the United States Government it Departments, and agencies, taxpayers, Consumers, obstruct and impair the efficiency of the US Government and destroy the value of the USA operation(report as fair, impartial and reasonably accurate)[1];  interfere with or obstruct  the lawful governmental functions by deceit, craft or trickery and by means that are dishonest and make wrongful use of us government instrumentall, deprive the Plaintiffs and/or Petitioners the intangle right to honest service,(mail fraud)kickbacks, bribery and corruption of US Government Pubic Officials launder money to AKA terrorities, islands, and other foreign Governments, upsurp, deprive and/or deny the “50 States” US Constitution, submit false and fraudulent claims to the US Treasury, and  advance the interests of certain corporate entities — especially those in the oil, energy services, and weapons industries, in which a number of the  individual defendants are heavily invested, bankrupt the USA, (schemes Real Estate-Mortgages) and establish de facto one-party(organition) rule at the national level in the United States,  and enrich members and associates through the commission of multiple crimes, including predicate crimes under the RICO statute (e.g., murder, arson, kidnapping, extortion, wire fraud, interstate travel in promotion of racketeering) and other grave felonies, launder money(offshoring of US Dollars)  through theUnited States financial system and the United States “Departments, Agencies, Programs to AKA Queen Elibeth, and/or Foreign Govenrmentsand accomplished primarly through the joint participation with Supreme Court, US Federal District Court, Appealant Court, State Court and other Judicial authorities to deprive and/or deny the Whistleblowers and/or victims the right to a hearsing in furtherance, and inflict severe economic hardship upon Class Petitioners “victims and Whistleblowers” with the intent of impairing, obstructing, preventing and discouraging Class Plaintiffs and/or the Class Petitioners “victims and Whistleblowers” from writing, publishing, investigating and conducting judicial activism as a qualified Private Attorney .and, if need be, murder persons including loyal United States citizens, Veterans who honored and served the United States Government and/or not guilty of any crimes — whodisclose or threaten disclosure of Enterprise activities, or information  tending to discredit major Enterprise actors “OVERTHROW THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT.(TREASON, SEDITION AND CONSPIRACY)FRAUD

---

https://video.wixstatic.com/video/eddcb3_dbb9b7a5ec07481abc7d0672b007320c/1080p/mp4/file.mp4

https://i.ytimg.com/an_webp/JynPIhKcVX4/mqdefault_6s.webp?du=3000&sqp=COCWtpcG&rs=AOn4CLBTqcjd5SPo5nUfwrM26zS9-t8f0A

STATEMENT OF CLAIM

THIS IS AN ADMIRALITY OR MARITIME CLAIM FOR THE PURPOSES OF Rule 14(c), 38(e), 82 and the Supplimental Rules for Admirality or Maritime Cliams and Asset Foreiture Claim for declaratory and injunctive relief.

This criminal case has been brought by “The 50 States ex Rel Sharon Bridgewater Private Attorney general and/or Relator . I will sometimes refer to  the government as the prosecution. The government is represented at this trial by an assistant  United States attorney, [_________]. The defendant, [__________], is represented by [his/her]

The Plaintiff and/or Petitioners brings chares agains the Defendant Biden, Trump, Barak H. Obama, et al with violation of the Rackeeteereed Influenced and Corrupt Organization act for having intentionally,  _______, violation of the Numberg code.   Treason, conspired to overthrow the US Government, genocide intangle right to honest service, upursation of public office of the United States President,  and multiple other crimes which  a federal law, which is contained in under the 1^st Count of this complaint.   An Acutual contriversiy exist between Biden, Merrick Garland, Harris , the rights of the the “50 States”  Plaintiffs to books, documents, as private attorney general and standing to obtain relief,

[2]

THE RICO LAW PROVIDES:

       NO RIGHT TO A JURY TRIAL/CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS, NEGLIENCE

  FRCP Rule 9(h) provides in part: “If the claim is cognizable only in admiralty, it is an admiralty or maritime claim for those purposes whether so identified or not.” FRCP Rule 38(e) provides that: “These rules shall not be construed to create a right to a trial by jury of the issues in an admiralty or maritime claimwithin the meaning of rule 9(h).   The broad language of Title 27, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 72.11 makes almost all crimes whether or not they are Federal or States crimes “commercial crimes.” In the Propeller Genessee Chie supra, it was revealed that admiralty courts have jurisdiction over interstate commerce, so it would follow that the crimes listed in 27 CFR 72.11 are cognizable in an admiralty or maritime court, and such are commercial courts. The relevant part of the text is as follows: Commercial crimes. Any of the following types of crimes (Federal or State): Offenses against the revenue laws; burglary; counterfeiting; forgery; kidnapping; larceny; robbery; illegal sale or possession of deadly weapons; prostitution (including soliciting, procuring, pandering, white slaving, keeping house of ill fame, and like offenses); extortion; swindling and confidence games; and attempting to commit, conspiring to commit, orcompounding any of the foregoing crimes. Obstruction of Justice Addiction to narcotic drugs and use of marihuana will be treated as if such were commercial crime (In the Ebsworth & Ebsworth lecture of 1994, infra, Proctor Wiswall states: “Congress has been repeatedly held by the Court to have the power to extend the admiralty and maritime jurisdiction by statute,and Congress has repeatedly exercised that power;” (see e.g.,  The “Lottawana”, 88 U.S. 558 (1875); alsoPanama Railroad v. Johnson 264 U.S. 375 (1924)). 

---

[1]

[2]THIS IS AN ADMIRALITY AND MARITIME CLAIM WITHIN THE MEANING OF 9(H)  to recovery $150,000,000,000.00(One hundered and Fifty Trillion Dollars)  from 1993 and continuing thru present  for breach of international peace, breach of international treaties, breach of  US Government employment Contracts, breach of Corporate Contracts, Ant-trust violations, Rackeeteering, etc. and to recover money and/or property of which belongs to “the 50 United States el al”  “The Appellants and/or Plaintiffs.(victims of criminal activity torture, peonage, slavery, etc. ) via a denial of equal protection under the laws or as defined in the Declaration of Human Rights which can be found at website:_______________________The classes(natitional/transnational/international)  are so numerous that joinder of all members impracticable, and there is a common questions of law or fact common to the class, and the claims of the Plaintiffs are typle of the claims of the class.  The Appellant Class Represenative is a member of all of the above  classes and is suing as representative party and/or claiming the  claims amount of $150,000,000,000[One hundred and fifty trillion]on behalf of the all the above class members, and further will fairly and adequately protect the interest of the class members and deeclaratory and injunctive relief is appropriate.  The Appellants has exhausted all remedies and have no other adequate remedies at law.

THE STATUE OF LIMITATIONS TOLLED

AND FURTHER CRIMES AND STATUE OF LIMITATION CAN BE FOUND AT WEBSITE

Click to access RL31253.pdf

CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD THE UNITED STATES AND ITS AGENCIES IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 371

THE CONTROVERSY!!

THE 50 UNITED STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR VS. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT PROSECUTOR KARIM A.A. KHAN MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL( AND PREDESSCORS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO HIS TERM, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ALL ACTING ATTORNEY GENERALS, ALL STATE ATTORNEY GENERALS, DISTRICT PROSECUTORS, ALL ACTING ATTORNEY GENERALS, ALL APPOINTED SPECIAL PROSECUTORS ET AL)

COMES NOW “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR APPEARS BEFORE THIS COURT TO DECLARE THE LEGAL RELATION BETWEEN FIRST MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY(FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT)AS ONE OR MORE CHIEF JUDGE FOR D.C. CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS AND/OR U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE, AND THE RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF THE PARTIES, FOR THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL ONE OR MORE JOE BIDEN IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITIES FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT(AND PREDESSCORS FOR JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT), KAMALA HARRIS, legal relationship between parties and their rights in a matter before the court.  

RIGHTS AND DUTIES OF THE PARTIES AND DECLARATORY JUDGMENT

The role of the United States Attorney is to: (1) prosecute criminal cases brought by the federal government; (2) prosecute or defend civil cases where the United States is a party; and (3) collect debts owed to the federal government when administrative agencies are unable to do so and responsible for the prosecution of violations of federal law(and U.S. State Attorney(s) – as in Kamala Harris – District Attorney for San Francisco, California, role is to prosecute Criminals for State crimes. The role of the international criminal court Prosecutor is to examine situations and/or complaints under the jurisdiction of the Court where genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and aggression appear to have been committed, and carrying out investigations and prosecutions against the individuals who are allegedly most responsible for those crimes. 

CONTENDS CONSPIRE WITH ONE OR MORE TRUMP, KAMALA HARRIS, BIDEN, ISSUE VOID ORDER, COMMIT FRAUD ON THE COURT, COMMIT WIRE FRAUD, “JUDICIAL RACKETEERING” UPURP PUBLIC OFFICE, DISCRIMINATE AGAINST BOTH SHARON AND JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER DENY AND/OR DEPRIVE BOTH ET AL UPURP THE OFFICE OF THE U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL TO FUTHER DEFRAUD BOTH WITNESSES SHARON AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER ENGAGE IN A PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY, CONSPIRE TO COMMIT AND/OR VIOLATE THE RICO ACT,  COMMIT MULTIPLE CRIMES IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C SECTION(S) 215, 656, 657, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1014, 1341, 1343, or 1344 of this title, affecting a financial institution, or 18 USC SECTION(S) 471, 472, 473, 474, 476, 477, 478, 479, 480, 481, 485, 486, 487, 488, 501, 502, 510, 542, 545, 555, 842, 844, 1028, 1029, or 1030 AND/OR TWO OR MORE 18 USC 666(a)(1) (relating to Federal program fraud); 18 USC 1001 (relating to fraud and false statements); 18 U.S.C SECTION 1031major fraud against the United States); 18 USC section 1032 (relating to concealment of assets from conservator, receiver, or liquidating agent of insured financial institution); 18 USC section 1341 (relating to mail fraud); or section 1343 (relating to wire fraud),involving the sale of assets acquired or held by the the [1] Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as conservator or receiver for a financial institution or any other conservator for a financial institution appointed by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, or the National Credit Union Administration, as conservator or liquidating agent for a financial institution, shall order that the person forfeit to the United States any property, real or personal, which represents or is traceable to the gross receipts obtained, directly or indirectly, as a result of such violation.

(4)

With respect to an offense listed in subsection (a)(3) committed for the purpose of executing or attempting to execute any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent statements, pretenses, representations, or promises, the gross receipts of such an offense shall include any property, real or personal, tangible or intangible, which is obtained, directly or indirectly, as a result of such offense.

of this title,shall order that the person forfeit to the United States any property constituting, or derived from, proceeds the person obtained directly or indirectly, as the result of such violation.

The court, in imposing sentence on a person convicted of a Federal health care offense, shall order the person to forfeit property, real or personal, that constitutes or is derived, directly or indirectly, from gross proceeds traceable to the commission of the offense.

(8)The court, in sentencing a defendant convicted of an offense under section 1028, 1029, 1341, 1342, 1343, or 1344, or of a conspiracy to commit such an offense, if the offense involves telemarketing (as that term is defined in section 2325), shall order that the defendant forfeit to the United States any real or personal property—

(A)

used or intended to be used to commit, to facilitate, or to promote the commission of such offense; and

(B)

constituting, derived from, or traceable to the gross proceeds that the defendant obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offense.

(b)

(1)

The forfeiture of property under this section, including any seizure and disposition of the property and any related judicial or administrative proceeding, shall be governed by the provisions of section 413 (other than subsection (d) of that section) of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970 (21 U.S.C. 853).

(2)

The substitution of assets provisions of subsection 413(p) shall not be used to order a defendant to forfeit assets in place of the actual property laundered where such defendant acted merely as an intermediary who handled but did not retain the property in the course of the money laundering offense unless the defendant, in committing the offense or offenses giving rise to the forfeiture, conducted three or more separate transactions involving a total of $100,000 or more in any twelve month period.

ACT IN JOINT PARTICIPATION WITH BIDEN, TRUMP, GRANT U.S.A. SOVERIGNTY TO CHINA, FAIL TO PROTECT BORDER, ADVOCATE TO OVERTHROW THE U.S. GOVERNMENT AND/OR “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR” BY VIOLENCE, OPPRESSION, CONSPIRACY TO DEPRIVE RIGHTS AS DEFINED IN 18 U.S.C. SECTION 241 AND/OR 18 U.S.C. SECTION 242, DEFRAUD THE U.S.A. IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 371, EXPLOIT, COMMIT FRAUD ON THE COURT AND DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES OUT OF MONEY AND/OR PROPERTY IS INELIGIBLE TO HOLD OFFICE AS THE UNITED STATES PRESIDENT FOR RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY, TREASON AND CONSPIRACY WITH DONALD TRUMP TO DEFRAUD TWO WITNESSES AND/OR REBELLION AND INSURRECTION – JAN. 6, 2021 CAPITOL ATTACKS

AND/OR

CONSPIRE WITH AND/OR ACT IN JOINT PARTICIPATION WITH ONE OR MORE INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO JOE BIDEN IN ONE OR MORE OF HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITIES AS VICE PRESIDENT, PRESIDENT, KAMALA HARRIS IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SAN FRANCISCO DISTRICT ATTORNEY, SENATOR FOR CALIFORNIA AND/OR VICE PRESIDENT

ON ON ABOUT JAN. 1, 2009 OBAMA(BIDEN CO-CONSPIRATOR) AN ILLEGAL IMMIGATE HIMSELF BIDEN AND HARRIS, ALL CONSPIRED WITH TRUMP TO COMMIT INSURRECTION AND REBELLION, GRANT CHINA SOVEIGNERALL LOST THEIR REPRESENTATIVE CAPACITY(AND IS RETRO-ACTIVITELY IMPEACHED IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITIES FROM JAN. 1, 2009 – WHICH MEAN THEY ARE DISQUALIFIED FROM HOLDING ANY PUBLIC OFFICE AND/OR ARE DISQUALIFIED FROM HOLDING OFFICE, ILLEGALLY, UNLAWFULLY UPURP PUBLIC OFFICE CONSPIRED TO ALLOW “ALL IMMIGRATES INTO THE U.S.A. TO DESTROY THE U.S.A. BIRTHERS REPORT – NOT A CITIZENS OFTHE UNITED STATES DESPITE OVERWHELMING PROOF THAT HE IS IN FACT NOT A U.S. CITIZEN AND THEREFORE COULD NOT HOLD OFFICE AS THE UNITED STATES PRESIDENT – ALL CASES DISMISSED BY JUDGES(THE SAME AS ALL CASES DISMISSED ENTITLED SHARON BRIDGEWATER VS. OBAMA, TRUMP ET AL), WITNESSES DIED, – CLICK HERE- FOR OBAMA CRIMES -MAJOR HEALTH CARE FRAUD,

THAT THAT BIDEN, HARRIS, ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, ALL U.S.REPRESENTATIVES AND/OR CONGRESSMAN, ET AL ARE U.S. PUBLIC OFFICIALS :and as defined as one or more Member of Congress, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner, either before or after such official has qualified, or an officer or employee or person acting for or on behalf of the United States, or any department, agency or branch of Government thereof, including the District of Columbia, in any official function, under or by authority of any such department, agency, or branch of Government, or a juror; and “person(s) who has been selected to be a public official(s),” nominated or appointed to be a public official, or has been officially informed that such person will be so nominated or appointed; and were U.S. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES PERFORMING “official act” by means one or more decision(s), action(s) on one or more question(s), matter(s), cause(s), suit(s), proceeding(s) or controversy(s), which may at any time be pending, or which may by law be brought before any public official, in such official’s official capacity, or in such official’s place of trust or profit. WITH LEGAL DUTIES TO PROTECT THE UNITED STATES FROM ENEMIES, LEGAL DUTIES TO PROTECT THE U.S.A. BORDERS, AND ALL U.S. CITIZENS. ALL HAVE TAKEN OATH OF OFFICE AND HAVE SWORN ON THE HOLY BIBLE TO DEFEND THE U.S.A., and as defined in 5 U.S.C. SECTION 3331 which states, “An individual, except the President, elected or appointed to an office of honor or profit in the civil service or uniformed services, shall take the following oath: “I, AB, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.” THE CITIZENS OF THE U.S.A. AS DEPICTED IN THE FOLLOWING IMAGES:

OBAMA TELL PEOPLE THEY MUST SUBMIT TO THE ONE WORLD ORDER AND/OR SURRENDER THEIR RIGHTS TO AS FOLLOWS:

OBAMA ACTS OR OMISSION CONSTITUTE TREASON AND HE IS “RETRO-ACTIVITY IMPEACHED” AND/OR REMOVED FROM OFFICE, ALL EXECUTIVE ORDER ETC. INCLUDING OBAMA CARE, MILITARY DETAINMENT OF U.S. CITIZENS WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW “RFID CHIPPING THE GENERAL PUBLIC” IS NULL AND VOID AND WITHOUT ANY LEGAL EFFECT. ALL DISMISSED LAWSUITS INVOLVING HIS BIRTH CERTIFICATE IS NULL AND VOID, IT IS DECLARED OBAMA IS NOT A U.S. CITIZEN, AND WAS NOT ELIGIBLE TO HOLD OFFICE AS THE U.S. PRESIDENT

,   James Comey and/or Jeff Sessions have taken “Oath of Office,” to faithfully execute their legal duties and obligation as public officials.   Further federal law regulation “Oath of Office” by government Officials is divided into four parts along with an “Executive Order” which further defines the law for purposes of enforcement.   The law of 5 USC 3331/[1] provides the text of the actual “Oath of Office” that members of Congress are required to take before assuming Office.  The law of 5 USC 3333/[2] requires members of Congress to sign an Affidavit  that they have taken the “Oath of Office” required by 5 USC 3331 and have not, or will not violate the “Oath of Office” during their Tenure of Office as defined by the third art of the law, 5 USC 7311/[3] which explicitly makes it a federal criminal offense(and a violation of “Oath of Office”) for anyone employed in the United States Government(including members of Congress) to “advocate the overthrow of our constitutional form of government.”/[4]  The fourth Federal Law, 18 USC 1918/[5]  provides penalties for violation of “Oath of Office” described in 5 USC 7311 which include: (1) removal from office and; (2) confinement or a fine.   The definition of “advocate” is further specified in Executive Order 10450/[6]  which purposes of enforcement, supplements 5 USC 7311.   One provision of Executive Order 10450 specifies that it is a violation of 5 USC 7311 for any person taking the “Oath of Office” to advocate “the alteration…of the form of government of the United States by unconstitutional means.”  Our form of government is defined by the Constitution of the United States.  It can only be “altered” by Constitutional Amendments.   Thus, according to Executive Order 10450(and therefore 5 USC 7311) any acts taken by government Officials who have taken the “Oath of Office” prescribed by 5 USC 3331 which alters the form of government other than by Amendment, is a criminal violation of the 5 USC 7311. 

We hold these truth to be self-eidnet. That all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are life; liberty and the pursuit of happiness; that to seure these right, governments are instituted among men,deriving their just powers from the consent of governed; that whenever any form of government become destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principle, and organizing its power in such form as to them shall seem most likel to effect their safety and happiness.     Pursuant of happiness                 I have a right to be free and happy and to conduct commerce. I have a right to be free from stalking, harassment, assault, battery, violence, Our US Constitution is precious to all and every US Citizen must protect. The right to be made in the Image of God in heaven without deceit, fraud and coercion to change my DNA into the image of a “creature” without the right

Beginning on or about on or about 1993 and continuing thru present defendants, George H. Bush, William Bill Clinton, George H. Bush, Barak H. Obama, Donald Trump, Joe Biden, Kamala Harris. All of United States Supreme
Court Justices Obama and/or Loretta Lynch, Jacob Rothchild, foreign official including Xi Jinping, Vladmir Putin and each of them, wrongfully and unlawfully collect humanity DNA, change every man women and child DNA, advocate to overthrow our constitutional form of Government, commit Treason, jeopardize our national securityobstruct a congressional investigation, disarm U.S. Citizens conceal known facts from the American People and/or Humanity, vaccine  nano chip RFID technology, High Tech companies, surveillance enslave cashless society, cause every man women and child to receive racketeering violation, defraud two witnesses and victims of U.S. to fund the “vaccine globally”

On or about 1993 and continuing thru present  and a number of times since then, Defendant Class representative Bridgewater has demanded that defendants stop their wrongful conduct described above.  Plaintiff Barak H. Obama, Loretta Lynch(and her predecessor Eric Holder) and each of them, have refused and still refuse to refrain from their wrongful conduct.

Plaintiff  wrongful conduct, unless and until enjoined and restrained by order of this court, will cause great and irreparable injury to plaintiff in that we “the people of the 50 States, will l “United States Government” in that the United States will continue to suffer loses and/or the States will continue to be deprived or denied equal protection of the laws.

---

[1]              /Employees of the United States Government including all members of Congress are required to take the following “Oath” before assuming elected or appointed Office.

              5 USC 3331: “An individual, shall take the following oath:  “I, AB, do solemnly swear(or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter.  So help me God.”

[2]             

            /5 USC 3333: “…an individual who accepts office or employment in the Government of the United States…shall  execute an affidavit within 60 days after accepting the office or employment that his acceptance and holding of the office or employment does not or will not violate section 7311 of this title.  The affidavit is prima facie evidence that the acceptance and holding of office or employment by the affiant does not or will not violate section 7311 of this title.”

[3]             

            / Federal law specifically prohibits any individual from accepting or holding any position(including elected office) in the United States Government if they advocate the overthrow of our constitutional form of Government.

                              5 USC 7311 (1): “An individual April not accept or hold a position in the Government of the United States of the Government of the District of Columbia if he(1) advocates the overthrow of our constitutional  form of Government……”

[4]             

            Advocate:  To speak in favor of or defend by argument.  To support, vindicate, or recommend publicly.  Black’s Law Dictionary  

[5]              Federal criminal law is explicit and direct regarding a violation of “Oath of Office” by Federal Officials which includes all members of Congress.  The law requires the removal of the Office holder as well a prison term or fine from the Offender.

            18 USC 1918:    “Whoever violates the provisions of section 731 of title 5 that an individual April not accept or hold a position in the Government of the United States or the government of the District of Columbia if he/she (1) advocates the overthrow of our constitutional form of government.”

            Executive Order 10450 states (in part):  “Whereas the interest of national security require that all

            persons privileged  to be employed in…..the Government shall be reliable, trustworthy, of good

                                 conduct and character, and of complete and unswerving loyalty to the United States..it is hereby

                                 ordered as follows:

[6]              In order to instruct investigating “a Federal Grand Jury and/or Special Prosecutor” to what is a violation of “Oath of Office” under 5 USC 3331 and 5 USC 7311, Executive Orer 10450 was issued to serve as a guideline from determining what actions constituted a criminal violation of the “Oath of Office” by Federal Officials.  The “Order” affirms the law of 5 USC 7311 that is a criminal violation under 18 USC 1918 for a member of the government, which includes members of Congress, to “advocate the overthrow of our constitutional form of government.”

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S. Code § 2383 – Rebellion or insurrection,

Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

BIDEN, HARRIS, TRUMP, U.S. SENATORS ET AL ARE GUILTY FOR THE ACTS OR OMISSIONS, ONE OR MORE GUILTY OF “CONSPIRACY, COMPLICITY, AIDING AND ABETTING TRUMP,” TO DEFRAUD BOTH SHARON AND JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER(FORMER REAL ESTATE BROKER AND/OR BUSINESS OWNER(S) REBELLION OR INSURRECTION FOR FAILING TO PROSECUTE TRUMP AND ARE INCAPABLE OF HOLD “ANY OFFICE UNDER THE UNITED STATES!! ”

PURSUANT TO MY DUTY AS A U.S. CITIZEN AND PURSUANT TO THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE(TO FORM A NEW GOVERNMENT PURSANT TO THE DECLARATION OF INDENDENCE VIA BIDEN, HARRIS, TRUMP, U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES TREASON, CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT GENOCIDE ON U.S. CITIZENS ETC.

ON JAN. 1, 2021

BIDEN’S FIRST DAY IN OFFICE JOINED A MARXIST TERRORIST GROUP(THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION; THE PRESIDENT OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION IS A MARXIST TERRORIST SEE SUPPORTING VIDEO #1)

BIDEN, HARRIS, TRUMP, U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, MERRICK GARLAND, XI JINPING, ET AL JOIN LAWSUITS(“UNSEAL”)IN A SCHEME TO DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES OUT OF MONEY AND/OR PROPERTY- CLICK HERE

ON MAY 22, 2022

BIDEN “ATTEMPTS” TREASON:

The Definition of Treason: An attempt to commit a crime is when a person makes certain steps to commit a certain criminal act but does not complete the act. Generally, the crime of attempt consists of the following elements:

1. The Person intends to commit the crime AND
2. The Person engages in conduct that constitutes a substantial step towards the completion of the crime

HAND U.S. NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY & OVER ULTIMATE CONTROL OF AMERICA’S HEALTH CARE SYSTEM(OBAMACARE) TO CHINA’S XI JINPING(COMMUNIST) & WHO PRESIDENT DR. TEDROS ADHANOM GHEBREYESUS PRESIDENT(“A MARXIST TERRORIST”) BASED ON THIRTEEN AMENDENTS TO THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION(SEE BELOW) :

THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS BIDEN SUBMITTED TO THE WHO AS FOLLOWS:

worldhealthorganizationadmendmentsDownload

BIDEN(TRUMP, HARRIS AND/OR OTHER U.S. PUBLIC OFFICIALS CO-CONSPIRATOR SEE BELOW)VOWED TO HAND OF U.S.A. HAND U.S. NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY & OVER ULTIMATE CONTROL OF AMERICA’S HEALTH CARE SYSTEM(OBAMACARE) TO CHINA’S XI JINPING(COMMUNIST) & PRESIDENT DR. TEDROS ADHANOM GHEBREYESUS PRESIDENT(“A MARXIST TERRORIST”)IN 2024 UPON WINNING THE ELECTION!!

IN ADDITION, INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT(ICC)PROSECUTOR KARIM KHAN

RECEIVED A COMPLAINT FROM ONE OR MORE “OTHER CO-CONSPIRATORS” DETAILING THE INTENT OF THE COV-19 INJECTION, THE COMPLAINT STATES THAT COVID IS A BIOLOGICAL WEAPON, CONTAINS GRAPHE OXIDE WITH THE MIRCO-RAMN SPECTROSCOPY, THE STUDY OF FREQUENCIES; AND CONTAIN GRAPHENE HYDROXIDE AND ITS NANO STRUCTURES INJECTED INTO THE HUMAN BODY ACTS LIKE

RAZOR BLADES INSIDE THE VEINS OF VACCINE RECIPIENTS. FURTHER THE DR. STATES, DUE TO THE NANO SIZE OF THE GRAPHENE OXIDE STRUCTURES THEY WOULD NOT SHOW UP ON AN AUTOPSY AS TOXICOLOGIST CAN’T IMAGINE THAT THERE ARE STRUCTURES THAT CAN CUT UP BLOOD VESSELS CAUSING PEOPLE TO BLEED TO DEATH ON THE INSIDE SO THEY WOULD NOT BE LOOKING FOR THEM GIVEN THEIR ATOMIC SIZE AS FOLLOWS :

Karim Khan prosecutor for ICC CRIMINAL COURT HAD A LEGAL DUTY TO PROSECUTE ALL PERPERTATORS FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE NUREMBERG CODE AS FOLLOWS GENOCIDE OF HUMANITY AND KNOWINGLY, INTENTIONALLY FAILED TO PROSECUTE ALL HEADS OF STATE AND IS EQUALLY RESPONSIBLE!!

BIDEN, HARRIS AND TRUMP SENDS THE MILITARY OUT- GOING DOOR TO DOOR(IN JOINT PARTICIPATION WITH THE CHINA, U.K. ET AL TO COLLECT “HUMANITY” DNA https://www.foxnews.com/world/china-collecting-worlds-dna-sinister IN GUISE OF CORONAVIRUS TEST AND FORCING TO ADMINISTER DDhttps://youtu.be/19KZOE3WDEc) THE COV-19 “EXPERIMENTAL INJECTION” IN WHICH ALL ANIMALS DIED WHEN THEY RECEIVED THE COV-19 INJECTION AS FOLLOWS:

IN THIS FOLLOWING THE “TECHNOLOGY SPECIALIST” EXPLAINS THE COV-19 INJECTION

(NANOTECHNOLOGY NETWORK )

CLICK HERE FOR CENSORSHIP SUPPORTING VIDEOS ABOUT THE COV-19 INJECTION

U.S. CHANGES METHOD OF EXECUTION TO CONFORM WITH GERMANY HOLOCAUST(SEE BELOW ARTICLE)

THE HOMELESSNESS WILL END BY “SWEPT OFF THE STREET WITH THE CHINESE MILITARY BROOM” AND IS THE FIRST TO GO IN THE “GARAGE CAN” HOLOCAUST EXTERMINATION -GAS CHAMBER, FIRING SQUAD, ETC. ALREADY APPROVED IN THE U.S. BY TRUMP AND XI JINPING CONSPIRACY

IN FURTHERANCE OF THE UNLAWFUL CONSPIRACY OF BIDEN, HARRIS ET AL ONE OR BOTH CLAIMS HE TO HAVE RECEIVED BOTH DOES OF COV-19 INJECTION AND/OR TWO BOOSTER AS FOLLOWS:

AND NOW HAS COVID

BIDEN NOW TEST POSITIVE(NOT ONE BUT TWICE) AND/OR HAVE COVID AS FOLLOWS:

IN FURTHERANCE OF THEIR ILLEGAL CONSPIRACY BIDEN AND/OR HARRIS MADE FALSE INTENTIONAL MISREPRESENTATIONS TO THE PUBLIC(IF HE GOT THE SHOT OR FAKED GETTING THE SHOT AS FOLLOWS: –

THEY BIDEN AND HARRIS AND OTHERS “LIED” TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ABOUT COVID; JOE BIDEN STATED ON NATIONAL T.V. THAT A PERSON WHO RECEIVED THEIR COV-19 INJECTION WILL NOT CAN GET COVID (HE CLAIMS HE HAD TWO SHOTS AND A BOOSTER AS FOLLOWS:

BIDEN, HARRIS, XI JINPING CONSPIRES WITH WHO, PREPARE FOR THE “SECOND PANDEMIC(INSINUATING THAT THE 1ST PANDEMIC WAS “PLANNED”)AS FOLLOWS:

what-joe-biden-said-about-a-second-pandemicDownload

7-27-2022(ON OR ABOUT)

DR. TEDROS ADHANOM GHEBREYESUS PRESIDENT FOR WHO(“A MARXIST TERRORIST”)NOW DECLARES AN GLOBAL EMERGENCY(THE MONKEYPOX – THE SAME GROUP – HOMOSEXUALS AND IT SOUNDS ALOT LIKE THE HIV “WHEN IT FIRST CAME OUT”), UPON INFORMATION AND BELIEF TO CREATE MORE CHAOS AMONG HUMANITY, TO PREVENT THE ARREST OF AND DETAINMENT

7-28-2022 AND CONTINUNING THRU TO AUGUST 4, 2022

BIDEN CONSPIRES AGAIN WITH DR. TEDROS ADHANOM GHEBREYESUS PRESIDENT FOR WHO(“A MARXIST TERRORIST”)AND DECLARES A MONKEY POX PANDEMIC AS FOLLOWS:

THE GLOBAL ELITE AND “PRIMARY CO-CONSPIRATORS” TELL HUMANITY WHAT THEY ARE PLANNING FOR HUMANITY(THIS CAN BE FOUND ON THEIR WEBSITE AT https://www.weforum.org/ (IN WHICH THEY QUICKLY CHANGED ONE OR MORE PAGES BECAUSE THEY KNEW ABOUT THIS WEBSITE)GREAT RESET IN THEIR OWN WORDS(WE – HUMANS ARE HACKABLE ANIMALS VIA THE COV-19 INJECTION) AS FOLLOWS:

THE GOAL IS TO COERCE THE TWO WITNESSES(AND/OR HUMANITY) TO OFFER INCENTATIVE TO PEOPLE SO THEY WILL APPLY FOR AND USE CASHLESS WALLETS VIA THEIR CELLS PHONE( Apple Pay, Google Pay, Samsung Pay) BY GRANTING PEOPLE MORE INCENTIVES WHEN THEY USE THEIR PHONE APP., USE “PHONE WALLETS” TO PAY FOR PURCHASES. ALSO TO “MASS MARKET VACCINES VIA THE MEDIA(T.V., INTERNET, RADIO ETC.)” TO COERCE THE TWO WITNESSES, U.S. POPULATION AND HUMANITY TO GET USE TO VACCINES SHOTS FOR ONE OR MORE MONEY POX, CHICKEN POX, SHINGLES, MORE COV-19 INJECTIONS AND BOOSTERS, VIA CORONAVIRUS, COV-19, HAEMOPHILUS INFLUEZA TYPE B, INFLUENZA(FLU), MENINGITIS, POLIO, HEPATITIS A, HEPATITIS B, HPV, DIPHTHERIA, PERTUSSIS,

BIDEN’S KNOWINGLY, INTENTIONALLY MADE FALSE REPRESENTATIONS TO U.S. CITIZENS, FAUCCI, CENTERS FOR DISEASE CENTER DIRECTOR(S), PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES U.S. SENATORS, REPRESENTATIVES ALL ARE EXEMPT FROM GETTING

THE COV-19 EXEMPTIONS AS FOLLOWS:

ACTIONS CONSTITUTE “ATTEMPTED” TREASON!! “ATTEMPTS” ARE PROSECUTED AS AN ACT OF TREASON AND BIDEN IS GUILTY OF TREASON VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C.§ 2381, SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S. Code § 2384!

ALL CORPORATIONS(FACEBOOK, TWITTER, MICROSOFT ET AL)ACTING IN JOINT PARTICIPATION AND CONTINUES TO ACT IN JOINT PARTICIPATION TO CENSOR THE TWO WITNESSES AND/OR HUMANITY(ANYONE WHO TAKES AGAINST THE COV-19 INJECTION)

IN FURTHERANCE OF BIDEN, HARRIS TO DESTROY AMERICA AND IMPRISON U.S. CITIZENS, CONCENTRATION CAMPS “FAIL TO PROTECT U.S. BORDERS AND LET “ALL IMMIGRATES” IN TO THE U.S.A. TO DESTROY AMERICA AS FOLLOWS:

DONALD TRUMP-FOR TREASON 18 U.S. Code § 2381 ) TO PREVENT CONTINUING CONSPIRACY WITH DR. FAUCCI, XI-JINPING AND “ALL HEADS OF STATE” “UNLEASING””EXPERIMENTAL” COV-19 VACCINE, BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS(THE CORONAVIRUS)ON HUMANITY AND COMMITTING TEN OR MORE VIOLATIONS OF THE NUREMBERG CODE, CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY,

BIDEN, HARRIS AND TRUMP – GOING DOOR TO DOOR TO ADMINSTER THE “EXPERIMENTAL INJECTION” IN WHICH ALL ANIMALS DIED AS FOLLOWS:

THE COV-19 INJECTION

ID (AND PREDESSCORS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THUR TO THEIR TERM INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO DONALD TRUMP-FOR TREASON 18 U.S. Code § 2381 ) “INELIGIBLE TO HOLD PUBLIC OFFICE FOR HIS ACTS OR OMISSION

JAN. 6, 2021 TRUMP

REBELLION OR INSURRECTION 18 U.S. Code § 2383(HE HAD A LEGAL DUTY AS PRESIDENT TO CALL THE NATIONAL GUARDS TO PROTECT OUR U.S. CAPITOL)AND FAILED TO!! TRUMP IS GUILTY OF AIDING, ABETTING PUTIN 2016 ELECTIONS, AND

JAN. 6, 2021 TRUMP

REBELLION OR INSURRECTION 18 U.S. Code § 2383(HE HAD A LEGAL DUTY AS PRESIDENT TO CALL THE NATIONAL GUARDS TO PROTECT OUR U.S. CAPITOL)AND FAILED TO!! TRUMP IS GUILTY OF AIDING, ABETTING PUTIN 2016 ELECTIONS, AND

CONSPIRACY WITH ONE OR MORE NATIONS, SAUDI ARAB

ALL(U.S. GOVT. PUBLIC OFFICIALS AND/OR MAJOR CORPORATIONS DIRECTORS, OFFICERS ETC. MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS CHIEF JUDGE AND/OR U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, KAMALA HARRIS, OBAMA, BIDEN TWO WITNESSES(MINORITY AFRICAN SOCIOECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED KNEW AND WERE AWARE THAT BOTH SHARON AND JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER, INJURED AND DAMAGED FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT TWO WITNESSES(MINORITY AFRICAN SOCIOECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED HAD BEEN INJURED AND DALL AIDED, ABETTED AND/OR CONSPIRED WITH DONALD TRUMP ” A REAL ESTATE TYCOON BUSINESSES MAN AND/OR PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, ONE OR MORE FOREIGN OFFICIALS RUSSIA, CHINA, ETC. COMMIT FRAUD ON THE COURT, DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES OUT OF 125 TRILLION “TO COMMIT ELECTIONS FRAUD(VIA HILLARY CLINTON SEE BELOW)”TO ACT UNDER THE COLOR OF LAW, DISCRIMINATE TWO SOCIOECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED AFRICAN AMERICAN U.S. CITIZENS AND “FORMER” REAL ESTATE BUSINESS OWNERS, EXPLOIT, COMMIT ONE OR MORE ABUSE OF PROCESS, FRAUD ON THE COURT, ALTERED, FORGED OR COUNTERFEIT A PUBLIC RECORD OR CERTIFICATE RETURN OR ATTESTATON OF A CLERK IN IN THE D.C. COURT OF APPEALS ENTITLED SHARON BRIDGEWATER VS. DONALD TRUMP, WIRE FRAUD, MAIL FRAUD, EXTORTION COMMIT FRAUD ON MULTIPLE COURT , RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY, HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND A HOST OF OTHER FELONIOUS CRIMES, INJURED IN BUSINESS, PERSON OR PROPERTY AND RESTRAINED FROM AGAINST TWO SOCIOL XI JINPING AND DR. FAUCCI TO COMMIT COMMIT TREASON, JAN. 6, 2021 ELECTION FRAUD, GENOCIDE ON HUMANITY AND FUND THE “COV-19 INJECTION” BY EXPLOITING & DEFRAUDING TWO WITNESSES TO “FUND” THE COV-19 – HAND CHINA SOVERIE, ENSLAVE THE TWO WITNESSED

AIDING, ABETTED AND/OR CONSPIRING WITH DONALD TRUMP IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS PRESIDENT AND/OR INDIVIDUALLY, BETRAYED PUBLIC TRUST, TO PROMOTE THE “INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL INTERPRIZE” GENOCIDE ON HUMANITY VIA THE COV-19

CRIMINALS(MERRICK GARLAND TRUMP PARTNER IN CRIME) CAN NOT AND WILL NOT PROSECUTE EACH OTHER!!

GARLAND IS TRUMP CRIMINAL PARTNER(COMMITTED FRAUD ON THE COURT ETC. IN A SCHEME TO DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES) AND IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE JAN. 6, 2021 CAPITOL ATTACKS(SEE THIS WEBSITE) GARLAND KNOWS IF HE PROSECUTE TRUMP “HIS CHANCE FOR 125 TRILLION AND HIS CHANCE FOR “OBTAINING MONEY WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW -ILLEGAL FUNDS” “GOES DOWN THE DRAIN!!” ALL U.S. SENATORS, ET AL AIDED, ABETTED DONALD TRUMP TO DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES AND IS GUILTY OF MERRICK GARLAN

“THE FAKE – SHAM MEDIA PUSHED” JAN. 6, 2021 PROSECUTION AS FOLLOWS:

TRUMP IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES HAD A LEGAL DUTY TO CALL IN THE NATIONAL GUARD TO STOP THE “CRIMINAL” ILLEGAL, UNLAWFUL ATTACKS ON THE CAPITOL AND FAILED TO DUE HIS DUTY AS PRESIDENT!! TRUMP IS EQUALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CAPITOL ATTACKS

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1GS2uybciaU

https://news.yahoo.com/controversial-saudi-golf-tournament-morphs-052223243.html

ARE SERPENTS “LITERALLY” & “LUCIFER’S/SATAN AGENTS- WORKING ON BEHALF

ARE

ILLEGALLY, UNLAWFULLY USURPS, INTRUDE INTO OR UNLAWFULLY HOLD AND/OR EXECUTE ONE OR MORE OFFICES usurping, intruding into or unlawfully holding and executing an office.

ALL HAD A LEGAL DUTY TO IMPEACH TRUMP FOR TO DEFRAUD TO WITNESS AND THEIR ACTS OR OMISSIONS AND ARE INELIGIBLE TO HOLD PUBLIC OFFICE

COMES NOW “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR APPEARS BEFORE THIS COURT TO DECLARE THE LEGAL RELATION BETWEEN FIRST MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY(FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT)AS ONE OR MORE CHIEF JUDGE FOR D.C. CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS AND/OR U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE, AND THE RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF THE PARTIES, FOR THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL ONE OR MORE JOE BIDEN IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITIES FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT(AND PREDESSCORS FOR JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT), KAMALA HARRIS, legal relationship between parties and their rights in a matter before the court.  

ON OR ABOUT JULY 5, 2019 MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS CHIEF JUDGE U.S. COURT OF APPEAL D.C. CIRCUIT JUDGE ILLEGALLY, UNLAWFUL, FORGED MY NAME(SHARON BRIDGEWATER) TO ACTED IN JOINT PARTICIPATION WITH DONALD TRUMP, U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/cadc/19-1141, COMMIT FRAUD ON THE COURT WIRE FRAUD IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1343, IN A SCHEME TO DEFRAUD BOTH SHARON AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER OUT OF MONEY AND/OR PROPERTY WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW

SUBSEQUENLY, CONSPIRED WITH ONE OR MORE BIDEN AND HARRIS, SWORE IN A U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE TO CONTINUE TO DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES, CURRENTLY, ILLEGALLY UNLAWFULLY UPURP PUBLIC OFFICE WITHOUT THE RIGHT!

SEE BELOW:

DONALD TRUMP IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPCITY AS BUSINESS MAN AND/OR PRESIDENT

ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES INCLUDING K.B. JACKSON, ONE OR MORE Jacob Rothchild, Henry Kissinger, Angela Merkel, Emmanuel Macron, “The British Royals,” Klaus Schwab, AKA “The Pope” one or more “TRANSNATIONAL COMPANIES,” Microsoft, Apple, American International Group, Inc., Facebook, Twitter, Tesla, Walmart, Bill Gates, officers, directors, shareholders, founders, managers, agents, servants, employees, agents, borrowed employees, causal employee, consultants, contractors, de facto employees, independent contractors, joint adventures, loaned employees, staffer(s), subcontractor who own firms, partnerships, associations, companies, corporations and/or parent corporations, affliates, , subsidiaries, joint ventures, proprietors, syndicated or other legal, individual, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity, ET AL

“THE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES PRESIDENT,” “THE OFFICE OF THE VICE PRESIDENT, “THE OFFICES OF ALL SUPREME COURT JUSTICES” THE OFFICES OF claims an interest in property Lynch have in his possession – documents, printed, recorded, reproduced by process or written or produced by hand including, but not limited to books, records, reports, agreements, communications, including inter-department and intra department communications, correspondence, letters, telegrams, memoranda, financial statements, summaries, or records of personal conversations, tapes recordings, statistical statements, notebooks, charts, graphs, indexes, drawings, blue prints, minutes or records, or meetings, including directors meetings, minutes of conferences, drafts of any documents, and original or preliminary notes etc.

THE MOST RECENT ILLEGAL CRIMINAL ACTS OF JOE BIDEN, HARRIS AND GARLAND

JULY 22, 2022

JOE BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS, MERRICK GARLAND MOST RECENT ILLEGAL, UNLAWFUL “TREASONOUS” ACT, THEY SUMMONS THEIR CRIMINAL PARTNER IN CRIME DONALD TRUMP TO WASHINGTON D.C. TO CONTINUE HIS TREASON, SEDITION, AND HIS CONTINUED CONSPIRACY TO ABUSE THE COURTS, CONSPIRE WITH U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES TO DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES AS FOLLOWS:

7-28-2022

7-29-2022

7-29-2022 – BIDEN FURTHER CONSPIRES WITH XI JINPING TO DISARM U.S. CITIZENS(TO MAKE DEFENSELESS) FOR CHINA “TAKE” OVER OF THE U.S.A. IN VIOLATION OF MY 2ND AMENDMENT U.S. CONSTITUTONAL RIGHT(AND IN VIOLATION OF U.S. CITIZENS U.S. CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS)

B

AUGUST 2, 2022

IN FURTHERANCE OF THE DEFENDANTS UNLAWFUL AGREEMENT NANCY PEOLSI, TAIWAN, XI PINGING(ALL CO-CONSPIRATORS IN THE COV-19 INJECTION) ENTERED INTO ANOTHER UNLAWFUL AGREEMENT, “STAGE” A “FRABRUCATED A “CONTROVERSIAL U.S. – TAIWAN VISIT, AND “CHINA-AMERICA ULTIMATUM, ESCLATION, EXTRICATION” ALL IN THE GUISE “TO CAUSE A “FRABUCATED WAR” TO ALLOW CHINA TO “OVER-TAKE” AMERICA(ALREADY PLANNED BY THE FRABUCATED PLANDEMIC – TO CONSOLIDATE THE U.S.A. WITH THE “MARXIST TERRORIST GROUP THE WHO ORGANIZATION-SEE ABOVE – TRUMP, BIDEN, HARRIS CONSPIRACY)

AUGUST 7, 2022

GRAHAM AND/OR OTHER REPUBLICANS MESSAGE TO TRUMP IF HE RUNS AS FOLLOWS:

TRUMP, BIDEN, HARRIS, DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS ALIKE

1. § 2381. Treason
2. § 2382. Misprision of treason
3. § 2383. Rebellion or insurrection
4. § 2384. Seditious conspiracy
5. § 2385. Advocating overthrow of Government

U.S. TOP OFFICIAL WARNS TRUMP(CHINA’S XI JINPING AND FAUCCI CRIMINAL PARTNER IN THE COV-19 INJECTION – HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATION, GENOCIDE ETC.)COULD SPARK WAR WITH CHINA!!

U.S.A. AND CHINA “FAKE EXCHANGE OF WORDS”

NANCY PEOLSI, TAIWAN, XI PINGING(ALL CO-CONSPIRATORS IN THE COV-19 INJECTION) ENTERED INTO ANOTHER UNLAWFUL AGREEMENT, “STAGE” A “FRABRUCATED A “CONTROVERSIAL U.S. – TAIWAN VISIT, AND “CHINA-AMERICA ULTIMATUM, ESCLATION, EXTRICATION” ALL IN THE GUISE “TO CAUSE A “FRABUCATED WAR” TO ALLOW CHINA TO “OVER-TAKE” AMERICA(ALREADY PLANNED BY THE FRABUCATED PLANDEMIC – TO CONSOLIDATE THE U.S.A. WITH THE “MARXIST TERRORIST GROUP THE WHO ORGANIZATION-SEE ABOVE – TRUMP, BIDEN, HARRIS CONSPIRACY)

TRUMP OTHER CRIMINAL PARTNER PUTIN(CO-CONSPIRATOR IN ELECTION FRAUD FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE TO DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES – FAKED THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION-SEE THIS WEBSITE) BACKS XI JINPING

By Reuters

|

IN FURTHERANCE TO DEFRAUD THE U.S.A. IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 371″DISARM” THE U.S.A. AND MAKE THE U.S.A. DEFENSELESS AGAINST ATTACKS FROM ENEMIES BIDEN SALE WEAPONS AS FOLLOWS:

“BROKE” MACRON AND XI JINPING(SLITHER SERPENT SNAKES) NOW GET ON THEIR KNEES, BOWS DOWN AND BEGS SAUDI ARABIA FOR OIL AND/OR MONEY(SINCE THEY WERE UNSUCCESSFUL IN DEFRAUDING THE TWO WITNESSES) TO THE SAME PERSON THE CONSPIRED AND CONTINUE TO CONSPIRE WITH IRAN AGAINST SAUDI ARABIA TO OVERTAKE SAUDI ARABIA

https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20220728-macron-hosts-saudi-crown-prince-despite-rights-outrage

https://www.lemonde.fr/en/international/article/2022/07/29/macron-s-visit-to-cameroon-will-not-change-anything-say-ngos-in-the-country_5991862_4.html

8-2-2022

STOCK MARKET MANUPULATION TO RAISE MONEY AS FOLLOWS:

CHINA AND U.S. CORPORATIONS SCHEME TO “GET MONEY THRU THE STOCK MARKET – DEFRAUD INVESTORS(AND/OR THE TWO WITNESSES) – STOCK MARKET MANIPULATION AS FOLLOWS

BIDEN SIGNS BILL BOOSTING CHINA COMPETITION AND U.S. PRODUCTION AS FOLLOWS:

MICHIGAN GOVERNOR WHITMER, CHINA AND BIDEN AS FOLLOWS:

ON DAY LATER ON

8-3-2022

CHINA, BIDEN, MAJOR CORPORATIONS STOCK MARKET MANIPULATION(ON OR MORE STOCKS SURGE ONE OR MORE STOCKS “JUMPED” MORE THAN 21000%, INSIDER TRADING!!

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/amtd-meme-stock-21000-percent-surge/

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/08/03/stocks-making-the-biggest-moves-premarket-cvs-under-armour-moderna-and-more.html

Definition and Examples of Stock Market Manipulation VIOLATIONS OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1934 AND COMMODITIES EXCHANGE ACT.

ONE OR MORE OF THE CORPORATION, OFFICERS ET AL WAS ENGAGED IN

Spreading Rumors intended to inflate stocks via social media etc. for the purpose to defraud investors

Fictitious Trading

Fictitious trades are sham transactions intended to give the appearance of activity or price movement. These trades don’t have any change in ownership and carry no financial risk to the trader. Entering a large number of buy or sell orders and then canceling them is one example of fictitious trading. 

Price Manipulation

Price-manipulation schemes can use high volumes of trades to raise or depress prices. Fraudsters can also acquire inactive shell companies with registered shares. They then inflate the value of the shares through a series of phony transactions. 

Financial markets are critical to the growth and efficiency of the economy. Manipulation not only defrauds investors but also harms the economy by eroding confidence in the financial markets as well as the institutions that support and regulate them.⁴ 

Pump-and-Dump

Pump-and-dumps are the most common schemes to directly ensnare the average investor. They involve small companies, called “microcaps” or “penny stocks,” with shares that are traded over the counter (OTC). Companies that are traded OTC don’t have to meet the strict listing requirements of an exchange like the NYSE or Nasdaq. Fraudsters

Wash Trades and Matched Orders

Wash trades and matched orders are forms of fictitious trading. Wash trades are simultaneous buy and sell orders for the same number of shares and share price by the same party. There is no change in ownership, and there is little or no financial risk to the trader. Matched orders are prearranged trades between a buyer and a seller for a set number of shares at a set price.

Wash trades and matched orders are often used in the “pump” phase of a pump-and-dump scheme to create the appearance of a legitimate trading volume. 

Spoofing/Layering

Spoofing is another form of fictitious trading. It involves placing large numbers of buy or sell orders and cancelling them before they’re executed. In 2020, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) fined JP Morgan Chase $920 million for placing hundreds of thousands of commodity futures orders over eight years with the intent of canceling them before execution in order to influence prices.⁶

Marking the Close

Marking the close is a high-volume trading scheme. Large numbers of trades are placed at the end of the day, artificially driving up the closing price of the stock. In 2014, the SEC fined trading firm Athena Capital $1 million for systematically placing high volumes of trades in thousands of Nasdaq stocks in the last two seconds of the session over a six-month period.⁷⁸ 

8-3-2022

OVERT ACT -DAMAGE CONTROL!!

HYPOCRITE AND/OR BIDEN THE”LIAR(SEE ABOVE BIDEN TOLD US THAT WE COULD NOT GET COVID IF WE GOT THE COV-19 INJECTION)”

U.S. SUPREME COURT CO-CONSPIRATOR BIDEN IN ROE V. WADE RULING SIGNS NOT ONE BUT TWO EXECUTIVE ORDERS – SEE BIDEN VIDEO ON THIS WEBSITE BIDEN DO NOT SUPPORT ABORTIONS!!

https://theweek.com/roe-v-wade/1015634/biden-signs-2nd-executive-order-on-abortion

DAMAGE CONTROL!!

U.S. TOP OFFICIAL WARNS TRUMP(CHINA’S XI JINPING AND FAUCCI CRIMINAL PARTNER IN THE COV-19 INJECTION – HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATION, GENOCIDE ETC.)COULD SPARK WAR WITH CHINA!!

ALL ARE CONSPIRING TO GRANT CHINA SOVEREIGNTY OVER THE U.S.A. VIA ONE OR MORE FAKE WAR, “THE FAKE PLANDEMIC VIA ONE OR MORE COV-19 AND/OR MONKEY POX”)

COMES NOW THE PLAINTIFF/CLAIMANT “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR AND/OR ONE OR MORE SHARON AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER_______________________LIST COMPANIES. VICTIMS AND FEDERAL WITNESSES WITH FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE AND WILL SHOW AND PROVE TO THE COMMON LAW COURT AND TO THE WORLD THAT BIDEN, HARRIS, TRUMP, MERRICK GARLAND, HOLDER, OBAMA, BUSH, U.S. CONGRESSMAN AND REPRESENATIVES “THE ROTHCHILD’S CORPORATIONAS, U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES ET AL VIOLATED THE RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATION ACT, ARE GUILTY OF RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY, GENOCIDE ON HUMANITY AND A HOST OF OTHER CRIMES VIA EVIDENCE(DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS, ETC.)AND ESTABLISH PROBABLE CAUSE FOR THE IMMEDIATE ARREST, INCARCERATION AND FORFEITURE OF OFFICE, ALL RIGHTS AND TITLES, ETC.

BIOLOGICAL WARFARE AGAINST HUMANITY – TERRORIST GROUP

ho are the participants?

ALL AGREEMENTS BETWEEN ONE OR MORE BIDEN, HARRIS, BLINKEN U.S. PUBLIC OFFICIAL VIA THE IRAN NUCLEAR DEAL IS DECLARED NULL AND VOID AND WITHOUT ANY LEGAL EFFECT!!

https://www.cnn.com/2022/08/01/politics/us-iran-sanctions/index.html

The JCPOA, which went into effect in January 2016, imposes restrictions on Iran’s civilian nuclear enrichment program. At the heart of negotiations with Iran were the five permanent members of the UN Security Council (China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States) and Germany

.”THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR VS. MERRICK GARLAND IN ON OR MORE OF HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITIES AS CHIEF JUDGE FOR THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS AND/OR U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL – DECLARATORY JUDGMENT(A declaratory judgment is a court-issued judgment that defines and outlines the rights and obligations of each party in a contract. Declaratory judgments have the same effect and force as final judgments and are legally binding. These judgments are also called a declaration or declaratory relief.) THIS CASE IS RIPE!! MERRICK GARLAND IN OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS CHIEF JUDGE FOR D.C. CIRCUIT CONTENDS HE CAN CONSPIRE

ENGAGE IN A PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY, DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES OUT OF MONEY AND/OR PROPERTY WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW, COMMIT GENOCIDE ON HUMANITY AND/OR THE TWO WITNESSES-

ARREST WARRANTS AND/OR FORFEITURE FOR ALL BOOKS, DOCUMENTS, AND/OR OFFICES

GOVERNMENT PARTICIPATES AS                    

   RICO(1961)(4)

  “Office of the United States President”, “ Office of the United States Attorney   

               “Office of the “Office of Supreme Court Justices”

A line of cases hold that any governmental agency, court, political office or the like could serve as a RICO “enterprise.” United States v. Thompson, 685 F.2d 993, 999 (6th Cir. 1982)(en banc) cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1072 (1983). Among the government units that have been held to be “enterprises” are offices the United States President and/or state legislators, courts,. See e.g., United States v. Stratton, 649 F.2d 1066, 1072-75 (5th Cir. 1981); United States v. Clark, 656 F.2d 1259, 1261-67 (8th Cir. 1981) Office of county judge); United States v. Frumento, 405 F. Supp. 23, 29-30 (E.D. Pa. 1975), affd, 563 F.2d 1083 (3d Cir. 1977). cert, debued, 434 U.S. 1072 (1978).

In referring to the RICO liability of government offices the court thought it inconceivable that “in considering the ever more widespread tentacles of organized crime in the nation’s economic life, Congress intended to ignore an important aspect of the economy [simply] because it was state operated and state controlled ….” (563 F.2d at 1091.) Accepting defendants’ contentions would mean that “business organitions legitimately owned and operated by the states, even though their activities substantially affect interstate commerce, would be open game for racketeers. [The court refused] to believe that Congress had such ‘tunnel-vision’ when it enacted the racketeering statute or that it intended to exclude from the protective embrace of this broad statute, designed to curb organized crime, state operated commercial ventures engaged in interstate commerce, or other governmental agencies regulating commercial and utility operations affecting interstate commerce.”Decisions after Frumento expanded government activity to every conceivable government agency, court, or political office. United States v. Thompson, 669 F.2d 1143 (6th Cir), revd 685 F.2d 993 (6th Cir. 1982)(en banc), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1072 (1983) The Enterprize “OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY .” AND “US PRESIDENT” AND CONSTITUTE A LEGAL ENTERPRIZE  “OFFICE OF SUPREME COURT JUSTICE OR JUDICIAL OFFICE” LEGAL ENTEPRIZE AND ASSOCIATION“OFFICE OF ELECTIONS”

Series of Documented Acts
                           Comprising the RICO Offenses

A criminal racketeering enterprise requires a minimum of two contiguous acts to meet the legal definition of a racketeering enterprise. Dozens of such contiguous acts are documented including but not limited to:

• Obama failure to obstruction of Justice by Eric Holder(it no excuse Holder decides to comply with most of civil investigative demands “and not all”)and co-conspirators from  on or about August 2013 and continuing thru present of ongoing documented corruption in the government’s Office of the President(White House), Office of the Attorney .(Department of Justice), that enabled to occur a series of weapon trafficking, _____, which is the direct and proximate cause of the death of two boarder patrol agents.   
• The nomination , confirmation and appointment of Loretta Lynch without due process o law.
• Obama US Senators aiding and abeeWar Crimes, Crimes against Humanity, Repeated Terrorist Attacks, Repeated cover-ups of the criminal activities in overt and covert government operations that the Plaintiffs(the original source)discovered while a public housing facility.   
• The evidence of repeated conduct constituting “continual”obstruction of justice that they knew would continue to result in great harm to the American people , the US Government, the US Treasury and to national security.
• Each of these criminal acts were compounded by the fact that they were perpetrated by people in positions of trust, who were paid to enforce the law.
• Expanding on the number of parties involved in the series of predicate acts were the unknown−but suspected−Eric Holder and the U.S. Department of Justice−(and his predesors)parties that were orchestrating the multiple schemes and conspiracies and protecting each of the criminal acts of each and every one.
• Several US Senators and Congressman, confirming Todd Jones ATF director when they knew and were aware of a criminal pending investigation.

RICO Details

A criminal RICO racketeering organition crime re.res:

• Two or more related predicate acts, in a conspiracy. Predicate offenses are related if they have (a) the same or similar purposes, (b) results, (c) participants, (c) victims, or (d) methods of commission.
  
  1. Same purposes. The participants’ purpose was to defraud the two witness both Sharon and/or James S. Bridgewater and the U.S.A. DEPARTMENTS, AGENCIES IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 371 AND ENGAGE IN A PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITYss Plaintiffs of money and/or property and/or the intangle right to honest services, “inflict” extreme emotional distress on the Plaintiffs and/or Petitioners and/or other Whistleblowers to block Sharon Bridgewater, and other Whistleblowers, the press from reporting a continuing series of corrupt, with corporations, and criminal acts of public officials  joint participation with Corporations, individuals, to defraud the USA  involving key people in government.
      
  2. Results. The results included hindering and halting Sharon Bridgewaters and/or James S. bridgewater r the press from reporting the crime and/or  ability to properly report, publicize, and halt the ongoing corruption and conspiracy to defraud the USA.
      
  3. Participants. The participants included the repeated acts by the same people and groups, public officials including US Presidents, federal judges, Justice Department employees, lawyers, California, Michigan and judges and others acting in joint participation with each other.
      
  4. Victims. The victims included:
     
     • Repeated harm to Sharon Bridgewater et al, other Whistleblowers,  and US Citizens(the USA) and/or the press.  The harm consisted of seizing the Plaitniffs personal and business assets, depriving the Plaintifff Sharon Bridgewater and/or . the right to conduct commerce; depriving the Plaintiff and/or US Citizens and/or Whistleblower through a series of unlawful and unconstitutional judicial the rights and protections guaranteed to all citizens by the laws and constitution of the United States and/or the ability of IRS official to collect taxes, and/or the ability of the Plaintiffs, Whistleblowers and/or the Press to exercise their 1^st US Constitutonal amendment right to free speech.  
     • People of the United States who were harmed by the series of criminal acts and the documents actions of federal judges, Justice Public Officials, Department ofthememployees et al, and others, that enabled the crimes and resulting harm to continue.
        
  5. Method of commission. As it relates to the current and/or former presidents, public officials, federal judges and Justice Department participants, they perpetrated a series of acts including (a) failing to report the crime to congressional members and/or labeling the Plaintiffs as a vexatious ligation (c)gross prosecutial misconduct(d)acts of violence against Whistleblower for attempting to report the ongoing crimes against the United States etc.(e)failing to c

• The racketeering acts were related, the intent being to halt the reporting and publicizing of high-level criminal activities.
   
• Their actions consisted of a continuing pattern of criminal activities.
   
• All of the actions were continuing, from 1993 thru the filing of this complaint, and arguably continuing as judicial orders still exist in several federal courts attempting to bar the Plaintiff Sharon Bridgewater and/or Whistleblowers and/or the Press from filing any papers in any federal district or appellate court. These orders knowingly obstructed justice by blocking the Plaintiff Sharon Bridgewater et al from reporting major and deadly criminal activities against the United States; and blocked the Sharon Bridgewater, Whistleblowers et al from exercising federal defenses against the pattern of civil and constitutional, and criminal acts for which they are federal causes of actions for which federal defenses exist.
   
• The predicate acts and conspiracy gravely affected interstate commerce, and caused, or enabled to occur, a continuing series of major fraud against the USA and/or the Plaintiff which is thedirect and proximate cause of the financial ecomomic collapse and also affects interstate commerce through criminal activities in the US Government of public officials, abuse of US Government power, committing criminal acts of bribery, corruption, and for pand acting outside their scope of authority and in their individual capacities.

RICO REQUIRES NO MORE THAN 

      SLIGHT EFFECT UPON

INTERSTATE COMMERCE

              The Plaintiffs was damaged or injured in business or property.     RICO require no more than a slight effect upon interstate commerce. United States v. Doherty, 867 F.2d 47, 68 (1st Cir. 1989). United States v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1531 (7th Cir. 1985). cert. denied, 106 S.Ct. 1188 (1986).Predicate acts were related to the common purpose of the enterprise, defraud both Sharon and/or James S. Bridgewater to “push and/or fund” their Global COV-19 injection and being to halt Sharon Bridgewater and “all of Humanity via censorship from reporting and publicizing the ongoing criminal activities. See United States v. Bonanno Organized Crime Family, 683 F. Supp. 1411, 1437 (E.D.N.Y. 1988).    All aided,  abetted, counseled, commanded, induced or procured to defraud both Sharon and/or James S. Bridgewater and commit predicate acts as defined in 18 USC section 1961(5) and further Merrick Garland and predesscors from Jan. 1, 1993 and those operating under his directionMerrick Garland Eric Holder and Obama obstructed justice.    Further, Congress limited the force of Rule 8(b) by loosening the statutory re.rements for what constitutes joint criminal activities. United States v. Friedman, 854 F.2d 535, 561 (2d Cir. 1988); United States v. Castellano, 610 F.Supp. 1359, 1396 (S.D.N.Y. 1985). If a defendant is not named in a conspiracy or RICO count, he may be charged in a separate court, in the same indictment, if he is alleged to have participated in the same series of acts or transactions that constituted the conspiracy or RICO offense.   Further as far as the RICO enterprize,  some benefited from the enterprise, and some did not. The racketeering activity is not re.red to benefit the enterprise.  (The participants in the scheme are not re.red to have personally profited, though some did.  United States v. Killip, 819 F.2d 1542, 1`549 (20th Cir. 1987. )

Some defendants agreed to join conspiracy with knowledge that other members were to commit at least two acts of racketeering. United States v. Leisure, 844 F.2d 1347, 1367 (8th Cir. 1988). See ‘ 1962(d), defendant agreed to join conspiracy with knowledge that other members were to commit at least two acts of racketeering.

In  Shearin v. E.F. Hutton Group, Inc., 885 F.2d 1162 (3d Cir. 1989). The court held that Shearin, a pro se plaintiff, could recover for being fired, if she proved that it was an overt act in furtherance of an alleged ‘ 1962(d) conspiracy to bilk Hutton customers for trust services which were never performed. In Sedima the court noted that standing to sue under ” 1962(a)──(c) is based on proof that the predicate racketeering acts caused injury to plaintiff’s business or property. 473 U.S. at 495. The court also held that Sedina did not foreclose the possibility that harm arising from a conspiratorial overt act, distinct from the predicate acts listed in ‘ 1961(1), could confer standing under ‘ 1962(d). 885 F.2d at 1169-70.

Defendant was aware of the “essential nature” of the enterprise, which was a group of persons associated for the purpose of luring people into rigged card games. United States v. Joseph, 835 F.2d 1149, 1152 (6th Cir. 1987); in United States v. Gallo, 667 F. Supp. 1359, 1401, (S.D.N.Y. 1985), the defendant must have knowledge of the enterprise and at least some of its criminal activities; Defendant must have been aware of at least the . existence of the enterprise (United States v. Castellano, 610 F.Supp. 1359, 1401 (E.D.N.Y. 1985); in order to prove RICO conspiracy count government must show the existence of a “unified agreement to participate in the affairs of the enterprise through a pattern of racketeering ….”

The court held that § 1962(c) does not re.re concerted criminal activity, only that an individual commit at least two acts of racketeering while participating in the conduct of an enterprise. United States v. Castallano, 610 F.Supp. 1359, 1392-1396 (S.D.N.Y. 1985). Id at 1394.

RICO Violations Involving A
 Continuing Series of ATTACK ON THE PLAINTIFFS AND TO DEFRAUD BOTH SHARON BRIDGEWATER AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER AND OTHER PEOPLE SPEAKING OUT AGAINST THE COV-19 INJECTION

Dozens of separate predicate acts were perpetrated to block Sharon Bridgewater and/or Whistleblowers and/or the press from reporting ongoing criminal activities in high-level overt and covert operations involving government employees. That constituted claims under ‘ 1962(a),(b), (c), and (d), in factual allegations.

     1. RICO violators within the Office of the President, Office of the Attorney ., Office of HUD, et al conspired with each other  to halt the former Sharon Bridgewater and/or other Whistleblowers, “ the press” to disclose their major fraud, and/or to inflict economic hardship on the Plaintiff, restrain commerce, cause the Plaintiff suffering, and prevent the Plaintff from carrying out her responsibilities to report the crimes, all while all were either operating, directly or managing federal funds, and or  Offices of the US Government. 

• All Aided and abetted the repeated massive RICO violations and violated the Plaintiff civil right repeatedly.
•  Federal judges as RICO violators, entered the conspiracy, and continued actively from 2008 and continuing thru the filing of this complaint.  Their predicate acts included:

• Repeatedly blocking the Sharon Bridgewater complaint to halt the ability of the Plainiff to report the crime
• Entering a vexatious ligatant order
• Vacacating settlement conferences.
• Issued a series of unlawful and unconstitutional orders, with criminal intent, to halt the Plaintiffs ability to report the crimes.
• Corruptly, through violation of federal laws and constitutional protections, defrauded the USA in amounts in excess of 50(fifty) trillion dollars and knew and were aware ththey did not have the authority to schme and defraud, the USA. 
• Lawyers as RICO participants, aided, abetted the these corporations, partnerships, President and corporations, et al engaged in a series of unlawful  lawsuits from 1993 and thru the filing of this complaint, that violated blocks of state and federal laws and constitutional protections, that re.red the corrupt cooperation of Federal judges and federal judges.
   

 The evidence showed a nexus between the racketeering activities and the enterprise, the goal of which was to overthrow the US Constitution, deprive and/or denied the Plaintiffs rights as secured by international and/or nation treaties(the US Constituion), and defraud US Taxpayers, Consumer the intangle right to honest services and overthrow the US Govenrment prevent the Class Plaintiffs and/or Petitioners from reporting and exposure of a continuing pattern of corrupt and criminal activities that were inflicting, and would continue to inflict, great harm upon the United States.

TEN OR MORE NATIONAL SECURITY VIOLATIONS

1.   2 U.S.C. § 192 (Contempt of Congress Related to National Security)
2. 8 U.S.C. § 1185(b) (Travel Control of Citizens)
3.   18 U.S.C. § 219 et seq. (Officers and Employees of the United States Acting as Foreign Agents)
4. 18 U.S.C. § 791 et seq. (Espionage; Unauthorized Disclosure of Classified Information)  18 U.S.C. § 951 et seq. (Neutrality  Laws)
5. 18 U.S.C. § 1030(a)(1) (Computer  Espionage)
6.   18 U.S.C. § 1542 et seq. (Passport Violations Related to National Security)
7.   18 U.S.C. § 1924 (Unauthorized Removal and Retention of Classified Documents or Material)
8.   18 U.S.C. § 1831 (Economic Espionage)
9. 18 U.S.C. § 2151 et seq. (Sabotage)
10.   18 U.S.C. § 2381 et seq. (Treason, Sedition and Subversive Activities)
11. 22 U.S.C. § 611 et seq. (Foreign Agents Registration)
12.   22 U.S.C. § 2778 (Arms Export Control Act)
13. 42 U.S.C. § 2274 to 2278, 2284, and other Atomic Energy Violations that Affect National Security (Atomic Energy Act)
14. 50 U.S.C. § 3121 (Intelligence Identities Protection Act)
15. 50 U.S.C. § 782 et seq. (Communication  of Classified Information by Government Officer or Employee)
16.   50 U.S.C. § 851 et seq. (Registration of Person Who Has Knowledge Concerning Espionage Activities)
17.   50 U.S.C. § 1701 et seq. (International Emergency Economic Powers Act)
18.   50 U.S.C. § 4801 et seq. (Export Control Reform Act)
19.   50 U.S.C. § 4305(b) (Trading With the Enemy Act)AND OTHER  Matters Affecting the National Security
20. And pursuant to criminal statutes other than those set forth in 9-90.020(A)(1) which affect national security

UNLAWFULLY INVESTED IN, MAINTAIN, EMPLOYED AND/OR ASSOCIATED WITH AN”INTERNATIONAL/TRANSNATION” BIOTERRORIST CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE ENGAGED IN OR ACTIVIITES AFFECTED AND CONTINUE TO AFFECT, INTERSTATE AND FOREIGN COMMERCE, CONDUCTED AND CONTINUE TO CONDUCT OR PARTICIPATED AND CONTINUE TO PARTICIPATE, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, IN THE CONDUCT OF SUCH ENTERPRIZE AFFAIRS THROUGH A PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY OR COLLECTION OF UNLAWFUL DEBT IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C.A. § 1962(c) 

GENOCIDE, CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY, BREACH OF INTERNATIONAL PEACE, WAR CRIMES, CRIMES OF AGRESSION, VIOLATION OF THE NUREMBERG CODE

• TREASON IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S. Code § 2381
• MISPRISION OF TREASON IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S. Code § 2382
• MISPRISION OF FELONY IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S. Code § 4
• SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S. Code § 2384
• RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION
• VIOLENT CRIMES IN ADI OF RACKETEERING ACTITY IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S. Code § 1959
• BRIBERY OF PUBLIC OFFICIALS AND/OR WITNESSES IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S. Code § 201
• and a host of other unlawful felonious & racketeering acts(too many to name) including
• REBELLION OR INSURRECTION 18 U.S. Code § 2383

	Code	Type of Crime
1.	8 USC § 1324	Murder related to the smuggling of aliens
2.	18 USC § 32-34	Destruction of aircraft, motor vehicles, or related facilities resulting in death
3.	18 USC § 36	Murder committed during a drug-related drive-by shooting
4.	18 USC § 37	Murder committed at an airport serving international civil aviation
5.	18 USC § 115 [by cross-reference to 18 USC § 1111]	Retaliatory murder of a member of the immediate family of law enforcement officials
6.	18 USC § 241-247	Civil rights offenses resulting in death
7.	18 USC § 351 [by cross-reference to 18 USC § 1111]	Murder of a member of Congress, an important executive official, or a Supreme Court Justice
8.	18 USC § 794	Espionage
9.	18 USC § 844	Death resulting from offenses involving transportation of explosives, destruction of government property, or destruction of property related to foreign or interstate commerce
10.	18 USC § 924	Murder committed by the use of a firearm during a crime of violence or a drug-trafficking crime
11.	18 USC § 930 [by cross-reference to 18 USC § 1111]	Murder committed in a federal government facility
12.	18 USC § 1091	Genocide
13.	18 USC § 1111	First-degree murder
14.	18 USC § 1114	Murder of a federal judge or law enforcement official
15.	18 USC § 1116	Murder of a foreign official
16.	18 USC § 1118	Murder by a federal prisoner
17.	18 USC § 1119	Murder of a US national in a foreign country
18.	18 USC § 1120	Murder by an escaped federal prisoner already sentenced to life imprisonment
19.	18 USC § 1121 [by cross-reference to 18 U.S.C. § 1111]	Murder of a state or local law enforcement official or other person aiding in a federal investigation; murder of a State correctional officer
20.	18 USC § 1201	Murder during a kidnapping
21.	18 USC § 1203 [by cross-reference to 18 U.S.C. § 1111]	Murder during a hostage taking
22.	18 USC § 1503	Murder of a court officer or juror
23.	18 USC § 1512	Murder with the intent of preventing testimony by a witness, victim, or informant
24.	18 USC § 1513	Retaliatory murder of a witness, victim, or informant
25.	18 USC § 1716	Mailing of injurious articles with intent to kill or resulting in death
26.	18 USC § 1751 [by cross-reference to 18 USC § 1111]	Assassination or kidnapping resulting in the death of the President or Vice President
27.	18 USC § 1958	Murder for hire involving the use of interstate commerce facilities.
28.	18 USC § 1959	Murder involved in a racketeering offense
29.	18 USC § 1992	Willful wrecking of a train resulting in death
30.	18 USC § 2113	Bank-robbery-related murder or kidnapping
31.	18 USC § 2119	Murder related to a carjacking
32.	18 USC § 2245	Murder related to rape or child molestation
33.	18 USC § 2251	Murder related to sexual exploitation of children
34.	18 USC § 2280	Murder committed during an offense against maritime navigation
35.	18 USC § 2281	Murder committed during an offense against a maritime fixed platform
36.	18 USC § 2332 [by cross-reference to 18 U.S.C. § 1111]	Terrorist murder of a US national in another country
37.	18 USC § 2332a	Murder by the use of a weapon of mass destruction
38.	18 U.S.C. § 2332b	Acts of terrorism in the United States resulting in death, committed by a person engaged in conduct that transcends national boundaries.
39.	18 USC § 2340, 2340a	Torture resulting in death committed outside the United States by a U.S. national or by a foreign national present in the US
40.	18 USC § 2381	Treason
41.	21 USC § 848(e) (Anti Drug Abuse Act)	Murder related to a continuing criminal enterprise or related murder of a Federal, State, or local law enforcement officer
42.	49 USC § 46502	Death resulting from aircraft hijacking

ET AL FOR SCHEMES TO ENJOIN, RESTRAIN, RE-ORGANIZE, DISSOVLE, RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY, SCHEME TO DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES AND DEFRAUD THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IT DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 371 FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT RAC

BIDEN, TRUMP, ET AL TREASON, RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY AS FOLLOWS:

COUNT I

CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, IT’S DEPARTMENT AND AGENCIES IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 371 ASSET FREEZE, FORFEITURE OF PROPERTY DECLARATORY JUDGMENT, INJUNCTIVE RELIEF- RACKEETEERED INFLUNCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATION

THE LATEST

CLAIM ONE:

INVESTMENT AND/OR PARTICIPATED AS PRINCIPLE WITHIN THE MEANING OF SECTION 2, TITLE 18, USED OR INVESTED DIRECTLY AND PART OF INCOME OR PROCEEDS OF SUCH INCOME IN THE AQUISTION OF INTEREST IN OR THE ESTABLISHMENT OR OPERATION OF an Enterprise Engaged in a Pattern of Racketeering Activity:

18 U.S.C. §§ 1961(5), 1962(b)

(a) It shall be unlawful for any person who has received any income derived, directly or indirectly, from a pattern of racketeering activity or through collection of an unlawful debt in which such person has participated as a principal within the meaning of section 2, title 18, United States Code, to use or invest, directly or indirectly, any part of such income, or the proceeds of such income, in acquisition of any interest in, or the establishment or operation of, any enterprise which is engaged in, or the activities of which affect, interstate or foreign commerce. A purchase of securities on the open market for purposes of investment, and without the intention of controlling or participating in the control of the issuer, or of assisting another to do so, shall not be unlawful under this subsection if the securities of the issuer held by the purchaser, the members of his immediate family, and his or their accomplices in any pattern or racketeering activity or the collection of an unlawful debt after such purchase do not amount in the aggregate to one percent of the outstanding securities of any one class, and do not confer, either in law or in fact, the power to elect one or more directors of the issuer.

TREASON IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S. Code § 2381
MISPRISION OF TREASON IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S. Code § 2382
MISPRISION OF FELONY IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S. Code § 4
SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S. Code § 2384
RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION
VIOLENT CRIMES IN ADI OF RACKETEERING ACTITY IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S. Code § 1959
BRIBERY OF PUBLIC OFFICIALS AND/OR WITNESSES IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S. Code § 201
and a host of other unlawful felonious & racketeering acts(too many to name) including
REBELLION OR INSURRECTION 18 U.S. Code § 2383

UNLAWFULLY ONE OR MORE INVESTED IN, MAINTAINED, EMPLOYED AND/OR ASSOCIATED WITH AN”INTERNATIONAL/TRANSNATION BIOTERRORIST ENTERPRISE ENGAGED IN OR ACTIVIITES AFFECTED AND CONTINUE TO AFFECT, INTERSTATE AND FOREIGN COMMERCE, CONDUCTED AND CONTINUE TO CONDUCT OR PARTICIPATED AND CONTINUE TO PARTICIPATE, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, IN THE CONDUCT OF SUCH ENTERPRIZE AFFAIRS THROUGH A PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY OR COLLECTION OF UNLAWFUL DEBT IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C.A. § 1962A, B, C, D(c)

On or about November 2009 while Holder and/or those operating under his direction knowingly permitted firearms to be illegally purchased in the United States and unlawfully transferred to third-party possessors, Holder and his accomplices unlawfully removed Specialty Investment Group LLC, Specialty Global Investments INC. and/or the Plaintiffs business and/or personal property from the Plaintiffs possession; accessed, delayed, trasforred, and exploited that stolen property and caused injury to the Plaintiffs.  Since that time the Plaintiff Sharon Bridgewater, Specialty Investment Group LLC et al, learn what precisely Holder et al has been done with property while it has been outside the Sharon Bridgewater’s et al possession, custody and control.     The information acquired by the Plaintiffs has been staggering.  Eric Holder Jr. and his accomplices and various Attorney(s) – Offficers of the court, and others came to the meeting of the mind, entered into an unlawful agreement, distributed the Plaintiffs property to whomever they could all while ignoring the Plaintiffs repeated demands to surrender to the Plaintiffs her personal and business possessions.   Each one of these wrongdoers recognized they had no authority whatsoever to take any action with respect to the Plaintiffs property.  In spite of this acknowledgment in consicious awareness and apparent disregard of their tortuous conduct Eric Holder and those operating under his direction;  distributed Specialty Investment Group Property voluntarily offered it up to Georgia, and/or Calfiornia and/or Michigan authorities in order to promote a criminal prosecution of the PlaintiffsAlso,

The Class Defendant and/or Respondant  lost their ability to earn a living due to the above Defendants conspiracies, conspiracies to defraud todeprive the Defendant the intangle right to honest services. the Defendantout of money or property, violence against the Plaintiffs(WOMEN minority business owners), oppression, unfair business practices, unfair competition, conspiracies to restrain commerce, acts of threats, extortion, coercion, force, assault and battery, upsuration of business(es) The Specialty Investment Group LLC dissolved in Sept. 2010, due to the “repeated” conspiracies and/or unlawful attacks to restrain commerce, unfair competition, unfair business practices, repeated, continual  violation of the Specialty Investment Group LLC and/or the Plaintiff’s United States Constitutional violations civil rights by the above named Defendants. illegal overt acts by the United States Government  the Plaintiff has direct and/or indirectly proximate cause of the Plainiff’s mental and emotional instablilty and social security, oppression, deprivation of business and personal property, theft, and anti-competitive conduct of one or more of  the Defendants.receptant of from the.  (Specialty Investment Group LLC a Real Estate Company dissolved Georgia Company)who suffered loss of business and personal property resulting in the continual emotional and mental distress suffered by the Plaintiff and inability to operate business, conduct, which violates both federal antitrust laws. 

Acquisition and Maintenance of an Interest in and Control of

an Enterprise Engaged in a Pattern of Racketeering Activity:

18 U.S.C. §§ 1961(5), 1962(b)

Plaintiff now re-alleges each and every allegation as set forth above, and hereby incorporates same by reference, as if all were set forth fully herein.  Substance prevails over form.

At various times and places partially enumerated in Plaintiff’s documentary material, all Defendants did acquire and/or maintain, directly or indirectly, an interest in or control of a RICO enterprise of individuals who were associated in fact and who did engage in, and whose activities did affect, interstate and foreign commerce, all in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961(4), (5), (9), and 1962(b).

During the ten (10) calendar years preceding March 1, 2003 A.D., all Defendants did cooperate jointly and severally in the commission of two (2) or more of the RICO predicate acts that are itemized in the RICO laws at 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961(1)(A) and (B), and did so in violation of the RICO law at 18 U.S.C. 1962(b) (Prohibited activities).

Plaintiff further alleges that all Defendants did commit two (2) or more of the offenses itemized above in a manner which they calculated and premeditated intentionally to threaten continuity, i.e. a continuing threat of their respective racketeering activities, also in violation of the RICO law at 18 U.S.C. 1962(b) supra.

Pursuant to the original Statutes at Large, the RICO laws itemized above are to be liberally construed by this honorable Court.  Said construction rule was never codified in Title 18 of the United States Code, however.  See 84 Stat. 947, Sec. 904, Oct. 15, 1970.

Respondeat superior (principal is liable for agents’ misconduct: knowledge of, participation in, and benefit from a RICO enterprise).

CLAIM TWO:

Conduct and Participation in a RICO Enterprise

through a Pattern of Racketeering Activity:

18 U.S.C. §§ 1961(5), 1962(c)

Plaintiff now re-alleges each and every allegation as set forth above, and hereby incorporates same by reference, as if all were set forth fully herein.  Substance prevails over form.

At various times and places partially enumerated in Plaintiff’s documentary material, all Defendants did associate with a RICO enterprise of individuals who were associated in fact and who engaged in, and whose activities did affect, interstate and foreign commerce.

Likewise, all Defendants did conduct and/or participate, either directly or indirectly, in the conduct of the affairs of said RICO enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity, all in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961(4), (5), (9), and 1962(c).

During the ten (10) calendar years preceding March 1, 2003 A.D., all Defendants did cooperate jointly and severally in the commission of two (2) or more of the RICO predicate acts that are itemized in the RICO laws at 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961(1)(A) and (B), and did so in violation of the RICO law at 18 U.S.C. 1962(c) (Prohibited activities).

Plaintiff further alleges that all Defendants did commit two (2) or more of the offenses itemized above in a manner which they calculated and premeditated intentionally to threaten continuity, i.e. a continuing threat of their respective racketeering activities, also in violation of the RICO law at 18 U.S.C. 1962(c) supra.

Pursuant to 84 Stat. 947, Sec. 904, Oct. 15, 1970, the RICO laws itemized above are to be liberally construed by this honorable Court.  Said construction rule was never codified in Title 18 of the United States Code, however.  Respondeat superior (as explained above).

CLAIM THREE:

Conspiracy to Engage in a

Pattern of Racketeering Activity:

18 U.S.C. §§ 1961(5), 1962(d)

Plaintiff now re-alleges each and every allegation as set forth above, and hereby incorporates same by reference, as if all were set forth fully herein.  Substance prevails over form.

At various times and places partially enumerated in Plaintiff’s documentary material, all Defendants did conspire to acquire and maintain an interest in a RICO enterprise engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1962(b) and (d).

At various times and places partially enumerated in Plaintiff’s documentary material, all Defendants did also conspire to conduct and participate in said RICO enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1962(c) and (d).

See also 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961(4), (5) and (9).

During the ten (10) calendar years preceding March 1, 2003 A.D., all Defendants did cooperate jointly and severally in the commission of two (2) or more of the predicate acts that are itemized at 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961(1)(A) and (B), in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1962(d).

Plaintiff further alleges that all Defendants did commit two (2) or more of the offenses itemized above in a manner which they calculated and premeditated intentionally to threaten continuity, i.e. a continuing threat of their respective racketeering activities, also in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1962(d) (Prohibited activities supra).

Pursuant to 84 Stat. 947, Sec. 904, Oct. 15, 1970, the RICO laws itemized above are to be liberally construed by this honorable Court.  Said construction rule was never codified in Title 18 of the United States Code, however.  Respondeat superior (as explained above).

CLAIM I

                         LIBEL

CONSPIRACY TO LIBEL

                                                    CLAIM  II

  (VIOLATION OF THE EQUAL PROTECTION)2^ND AMENDMENT

Title 18, U.S. Federal Code, Section 241, which states: ”If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States…they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both…”.

The Second Amendment provides:

A well reulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a freeState, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.

US Const. amend. II.

          The Second Amendment “is full  applicable aains the States.” McDonald V. City of Cicago, 561 US 3025, 130 S. Ct. 3020, 302(2010).

           Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment provides, in relevant part:

   No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abride the privileges or immunities of citiznes of the United States; norshall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; no deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. U.S. Const. amen. XIVemphasis added).

            On or aobut  1993 and continuing thru to 2008.  Two or persons committed overt acts toward the Class Plaintif and are liable for damages.  On or about 2008 and continuing thru present Obama violated the “50 States rights,”enforced “unconstitutional laws violated his oath of office and is ineligle to hold office a as President and in furtherance of Obama unlawful actions.  Defendant Loretta E. Lynchand/or Obama conspired to breach the contracts with the United States and/or the Plaintiff, have engage in neglient “acts,” by failing  to perform their dutes and legal obligation as United States Attorney General and/ro the United States President.  Further the Defendant Barak H. Obama and/or Loretta Lycnh have violated her oath of office by failing to uphold the Untied States Constition.  On or about Jan. 4, 2016 Defendant Barak H. Obama and/or  Lynch  knowingly, intentionally, conpired under the color of the “50 States laws,” acted in their private person(and lost their representative capacities as US Attorney General and/or President) breached the contract with the United States,  violated the Plaintiffs 2^nd amendment rights.  The Actions of Obama and/or Lynch Jan. 4, 2016(Gun law) “prohibiting individuals from buying a gun if, because of a mental health issue, they are either a danger to themselves or others or are unable to manage their own affairs;   ARE ON THEIR FACE AND AS APPLIED, ARE UNCONSTITTUTIONAL DENIALS OF EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAWS AND ARE IN VIOLATION OF THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE OF THE FOURTEENTHAMENDMENT TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION.   The Class Plaintiff is directly effected the Class Plaintiff by the Department of Justice agency, commission or board  action of Loretta E. Lynchand/or Barak H. Obama(Gun Law) dated Jan. 4, 2016,  Obama and/or Lynch have deprived and/or denied the Class Plaitniff Bridgewater and other member equal protection under the laws and/or equal privledges and immunites and violated the Plaintiffs second amendment US Constitional right.  At all times acted in bad faith, with oppression, fraud or malice.  The Class Plaintiff on behalf of herself, the “50 United States et al”” (and those similarly situated from 1993 and continuing thru present  have been injured and damaged  by the the 2^nd amendment US Constitional rights violations and have damages in the amount of  $1000,000,000,000,000,000.00 Trillion Dollars, this amount is due and now owing .   Further Plaintiff  has reason to believe the defendants have committed activites and/or committed prohibited acts as defined in 18 USC section 1961.[Prohibited Acts-RICO].  [two – Predicate Acts 18 USC section 1505 and/or 18 USC section 1505(371) – Obstruction of Congressional Investigation.  The Defendants must be restrained and enjoined.

                                                          CLAIM III

CLAIM – VIOLATION OF RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR FIREARMS(U.S. CONST. AMEDS, II AND XIV; 42 USC SECTION 1983)

Plaintiff re-allege the above  On or about Jan. 4, 2016 Defendant Lynch  and/or Barak H. Obama approval joint)came to the meeting of the minds, entered into an unlawful agreement conspied under the color of te 50 state law executive order and/or statutory laungaged and/or statue, which restricts “persons who are not mentally ill – class Plainitff the rights and priviedges to possess fireArms or Guns. of carr , on its face and as applied, violate the class Plaintiff rights to posess and carry guns for self defense as secured b the SecondAmendement to the United States Consititon, and/or “the 50 States.” The Class Plaintiff have been injured and damge by the the 2^nd amended US Cosntiton rights violations and have damages  this amount is due and now owing.  

 

 

                                  CLAIM IV

                             BREACH OF CONTRACT

[RACKEETEERED INFLUNENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANZATION]   

  On or about April 24, 2015, the Untied States entered into a legally bindng agreement and/or contract with Loretta E. Lynchto prosecute criinminals, to uphold the United States constitution etc.  Under that agreement Lynch were required to prosecute, public officials(Hillary Clinton for “knowingly, willfullying destruction of e-mais and/or government property) further Lynch were required to upohold the United States Constitution and not to discriminate against a Class of Person based on race, class or disability.  On or about April 24, 2015 and continuing thru to Jan. 4, 2016 Defendant Lynch failed to comply with the agreement “of the United States and breached the agreement.  The Class Plaintiff have been injured and damge by the the 2^nd amended US Cosntiton rights violations and have damages  this amount is due and now owing.  

                                      CLAIM V

                                    NEGILENCE

On or about Jan. 4, 2016 Defendant Lynch and/or obama perfomed acts that a person of ordinary prudence in the same or similar cicumstances would not have done or she failed to perform acts that a person or ordinary prudence would have done under he same or cimilar circumstance becase she is the United States Attorney General and knew and/or should have known the “Untied States Constitution.” Even further Obama was an instructor at Hardvard “Specializing in constitutional law, he too knew or should have known the the Class Plaintiff were violated.  The Class Plaintiff have been injured and damge by the the 2^nd amended US Cosntiton rights violations and have damages  this amount is due and now owing.  

CLAIM I

                                     [ RICO ]

                              BREACH OF CONTRACT

By reason of the foregoing breach of contract, plaintiff is entitled tPlaintiff allege that the Defendant Donald Trump in his official capacity breached his contract, the Plaintiff has demanded property and Defendant has failed and refuse and continues to fail and to refuse, to remit the money and/or property although duly demanded requiring immediate injunctive relief and the Plaintiff has been damaged and continues to be damage and have damages  as follows:

_____________________                                                     $_______________

This amount is due and now owing, and the Plaintiff is entitled to writ of attachment,  judgment in the amount of __________________.  

Amount paid  $0                                 Amount due: $______________________.

                                                     CLAIM I

                                     [ RICO ]

                              BREACH OF FIDICARY DUTIES

Plaintiff allege that the Defendant Donald Trump in his official capacity breached his contract, the Plaintiff has demanded property and Defendant has failed and refuse and continues to fail and to refuse, to remit the money and/or property although duly demanded requiring immediate injunctive relief and the Plaintiff has been damaged and continues to be damage and have damages  as follows:

_____________________                                                     $_______________

This amount is due and now owing, and the Plaintiff is entitled to writ of attachment,  judgment in the amount of __________________.  

Amount paid  $0                                 Amount due: $______________________.  

                                                        CLAIM II

                                      [ RICO ]

CONDUCT AND PARTICIPATION IN A RICO ENTERPRIZE THRU A PATTERN OF RACKEETEERING ACTIVITY

Plaintiff allege that the Defendant Donald Trump in his official capacity conducted in a Rico Enterprize thru a pattern of Rackeeteering Activity  and the plaintiff has been injured and damaged and  Plaintiff has demanded property and Defendant has failed and refuse and continues to fail and to refuse, to remit the money and/or property although duly demanded requiring immediate injunctive relief and the Plaintiff has been damaged and continues to be damage and have damages  as follows:

_____________________                                                     $_______________

The Plantiff have punitive damages in the amount of $ ________________________.  This amount is due and now owing.

This amount is due and now owing, and the Plaintiff is entitled to writ of attachment,  judgment in the amount of __________________.

Amount paid  $0                                 Amount due: $______________________.  

.

                                                      CLAIM III

                                                   [ RICO ]

     CONSPIRACY TO ENGAGE IN A PATTERN OF RACKEETEERING ACTIVITY:

Plaintiff allege that the Defendant Donald Trump in his official capacity conspired to engage in a pattern of Rackeeterring Activity and the plaintiff has been injured and damaged and  Plaintiff has demanded property and Defendant has failed and refuse and continues to fail and to refuse, to remit the money and/or property although duly demanded requiring immediate injunctive relief and the Plaintiff has been damaged and continues to be damage and have damages  as follows:

_____________________                                                     $_______________

This amount is due and now owing, and the Plaintiff is entitled to writ of attachment,  judgment in the amount of __________________.

Amount paid  $0                                 Amount due: $______________________.  

                                                    CLAIM IV

                                                    [ RICO ]

                              MALICIOUS PROSECUTION

Plaintiff allege that the Defendant Donald Trump in his official capacity instituted and/or continued a criminal proceeding agains the claimant and the termination of the proceeding ended in the Claimant favor and the plaintiff has been injured and damaged anPlaintiff has demanded property and Defendant has failed and refuse and continues to fail and to refuse, to remit the money and/or property although duly demanded requiring immediate injunctive relief and the Plaintiff has been damaged and continues to be damage and have damages  as follows:

_____________________                                                     $_______________

This amount is due and now owing, and the Plaintiff is entitled to writ of attachment,  judgment in the amount of __________________.

Amount paid  $0                                 Amount due: $______________________.  

                                                    CLAIM V

                                                    [ RICO ]

   VIOLATION OF THE CLAIMANT 5^TH AND/OR 9^TH AND/OR 10^TH AMENDMENT US CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT[42 USC SECTION 1983/1985(3)]

Plaintiff allege that the Defendant Donald Trump in his official capacity acted under the color of law denied and/or deprived the Claimant her 5^th and/or 9^th and/or 10^th Amendment US Constitutional rights and the plaintiff has been injured and damaged anPlaintiff has demanded property and Defendant has failed and refuse and continues to fail and to refuse, to remit the money and/or property although duly demanded requiring immediate injunctive relief and the Plaintiff has been damaged and continues to be damage and have damages  as follows:

_____________________                                                     $_______________

This amount is due and now owing, and the Plaintiff is entitled to writ of attachment,  judgment in the amount of __________________.

Amount paid  $0                                 Amount due: $______________________.  

                                                        CLAIM VI

                                                       [ RICO ]

                                                       LIBEL

Plaintiff allege that the Defendant Donald Trump in his official capacity acted under the color of law conspired with other and “libeled” the Claimant and the plaintiff has been injured and damaged anPlaintiff has demanded property and Defendant has failed and refuse and continues to fail and to refuse, to remit the money and/or property although duly demanded requiring immediate injunctive relief and the Plaintiff has been damaged and continues to be damage and have damages  as follows:

_____________________                                                     $_______________

This amount is due and now owing, and the Plaintiff is entitled to writ of attachment,  judgment in the amount of __________________.

Amount paid  $0                                 Amount due: $______________________.  

                                                       CLAIM VII

                                                       [ RICO ]

                                                 NEGLIENCE

Plaintiff allege that the Defendant Donald Trump in his official capacity was negligent in enforcing unconstitutional, arbiratory law via the March 6, 2017 executive order and the plaintiff has been injured and damaged anPlaintiff has demanded property and Defendant has failed and refuse and continues to fail and to refuse, to remit the money and/or property although duly demanded requiring immediate injunctive relief and the Plaintiff has been damaged and continues to be damage and have damages  as follows:

_____________________                                                     $_______________

This amount is due and now owing, and the Plaintiff is entitled to writ of attachment,  judgment in the amount of __________________.

Amount paid  $0                                 Amount due: $______________________.  

                                                       CLAIM VIII

                                                       [ RICO ]

                                        PUNITIVE DAMAGE

Plaintiff allege that the Defendant Donald Trump in his official capacity had conscious disregard for the Claimant civil rights and/or Declaration of human rights and the plaintiff has been injured and damaged and has demanded property and Defendant has failed and refuse and continues to fail and to refuse, to remit the money and/or property although duly demanded requiring immediate injunctive relief and the Plaintiff has been damaged and continues to be damage and have damages  as follows:

_____________________                                                     $_______________

This amount is due and now owing, and the Plaintiff is entitled to writ of attachment,  judgment in the amount of __________________.

Amount paid  $0                                 Amount due: $______________________.  

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

          1. That the Court adjudge and decree that the combination 

and conspiracy alleged in this complaint and the acts done in pursuance of that combination and conspiracy were and are in unlawful restraint of interstate trade and commerce, in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act;

         2..That joint and several judgments in favor of the Plaintiff and the class members be entered against the defendants, and each of them, for the amounts described above.

         3..That the defendants be enjoined from continuing the combination and conspiracy alleged in this complaint and from entering into any combination, conspiracy, agreement, understanding, or concert of action having similar purposes or effects;

         4..That the plaintiff and each member of the class have any other additional relief as may be just and proper.

B. That Plaintiff and each member of the class recover:

i.Treble the damages determined to have been sustained by each of them,

ii.Reasonable attorney’s fees, and

iii.Their costs of this suit;

1. Declare Obama can not exert executive privledge. Declare that the Intervening Plaintiff is entitled to recovery damage and writ of process.

• Declare that Lynch actions are illegal and unlawful in that she can not obstruct justice and/or a congressional investigation .

• Declare that each and every arrest warrant of the Plaintiff is illegal and are void.

• Declare that the Plaintiff Sharon and/or James Bridgewater is unlawful imprisoned against her will under the State of Michigan and Georgia, and/or California law.

• Declare that Lynch cannot withhold any information pertaining to this complaint, allegations, and the Plaintiff “Sharon Bridgewater” is entitled to injunctive relief

• Declare

• Deckare that Lynch is disqualified and/or declare that the Platniff Bridgewater can prosecute this action.

• THE 50 UNITED STATES SHARON BRIDGEWATER IS PROSECUTOR

• Accordingly, all premises having been duly considered here, the United States now moves the Honorable Justices of this District Court for an ORDER to the 17A District Court  to show cause why Extraordinary Writs of Mandamus should not issue, commanding that Circuit Court to perform ‑‑ with all deliberate speed ‑‑ all duties owed to Appellant as specifically itemized above, beginning with a Habeas Corpus and/or Writs of mandamus to expunge arrest etc.

1. The United States moves for said ORDER, on the strengths of this PETITION and of the official records that are now before this Court, to reinstate a cause erroneously dismissed.

1. ISSUE AGAINST Dfendants Loetta Lynch be cired to appear and answer the allegatioin of this Complaint;

1. Issue a Writ of Qu Warranto Loretta L. Lynch

1. Private Attorney General, hereby exercises its statutory and appeal and moves this honorable Court for a Writ in the nature of Quo Warranto to issue upon Loretta E. Lynchin her official capacity as United States Attorney General to demonstrate by what lawful authorities each claims to preside as the United States of American Attorney General Intervenor also moves this honorable Court for a routine ORDER to the District Court Clerk, commanding that Office formally to certify to the United States Attorney General  formal commanding that Office formally to certify appellant  for presentation of all evidence admissible in the instant appeal, and for argument(s) on the questions of the constitutionality of the above.

1. That this Court liberally construe the RICO laws and thereby find and/or declare that all Defendants have associated with a RICO enterprise of persons and of other individuals who were associated in fact, all of whom did engage in, and whose activities did affect, interstate and foreign commerce in violation of the RICO law at 18 U.S.C. 1962(c) (Prohibited activities).

1. That this Court liberally construe the RICO laws and thereby find that all Defendants have conducted and/or participated, directly or indirectly, in the affairs of said RICO enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity in violation of the RICO laws at 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961(5) (“pattern” defined).

1. That all Defendants and all of their directors, officers, employees, agents, servants and all other persons in active concert or in participation with them, be enjoined temporarily during pendency of this action, and permanently thereafter, from associating with any RICO enterprise of persons, or of other individuals associated in fact, who do engage in, or whose activities do affect, interstate and foreign commerce.

1. That all Defendants and all of their directors, officers, employees, agents, servants and all other persons in active concert or in participation with them, be enjoined temporarily during pendency of this action, and permanently thereafter, from conducting or participating, either directly or indirectly, in the conduct of the affairs of any RICO enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity in violation of the RICO laws at 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961(5) .

1. That if Defendant  cannot be found within this District then all of their property within this istrict be attached in the sum of $________________________________, with interest thereon and cost, the sum sued for in this complaint.

1. That judgment be entered against the dfenant in the sum of $_________________together with interest and costs; and

• If for any reason it is alleged and/or found that Plaintiff is not entitled to the attachment of the Dfenants property under Admirality principle of foreign attachment, then in the, Plaintiff invokes the rovision of Section 6201 to 6226 of the New Yor CPLR(and/or similar “50 State laws”).

• this honorable Court for a Writ in the nature of Quo Warranto to issue upon Loretta E. Lynchin her official capacity as United States Attorney General to demonstrate by what lawful authorities claims to preside as the United States of American Attorney General commanding that Office formally to certify to the United States Attorney General  formal and the Intervenor also moves this Court for a routine ORDER to the District Clerk, commanding that Office formally to certify Intervenor’s intervention for presentation of all evidence admissible in the instant appeal, and for argument(s) on the questions of the constitutionality of the above.

• All premises having been duly considered, Intervenor respectfully requests this honorable Court to issue a routine ORDER to the U.S. Department of Justice Loretta E. Lynchto show cause why she should not be held in criminal and/or civil contempt of court.

• ate and prays that this Court order the attachment of said property pruusant ot he aforesaid provovision of CPLR and FRCP 4(e) and Rule B(1) of the Supplenmtnal Rules for certain Admarility and Maritime claims: and

•  That process in due form of law, according to the practices of this Honorable Court in causes of admirality and maritime jurisprudence, April issue agains the The Federal Reserve, foreign Officials, and all Defndants that all person having or claiming any interest therein be citized to apper and answer under oath, all and singular the matters aforesaid; that Plaitniff have a deree for its damaged aforesaid, with interest and cost; and that the The Federal Reserve, foreign Officials, and all Defndants be condemned and sld to stisfy plaintiff decree;

• That process in due form of law April issue against B citing it to appear and answer, under oath, all and singular, the matters aforesaid;

• That the Court order, adjudge and decree that Plaitnifff have a decree against B for claim asserted gy plaintiff herein tooether with interest and costs and 

• That Plaintiff have such other and further relief as April be proper and that this Court s compettnet ot grnt.

• That process in due form of law according to thepractice of this Honorable Court issue against the Defndants, citing them to appear and answer under oath all and singular the matters aforesaid;

• Declare that  Loretta E. Lynchaction constitute conspiracy under the color of law, and declare that Lynch is ineligle and/or disqualified as United States Attorney General.

• Declare JOE BIDEN can not exert executive privledge.

• Judgment against Loretta LynchPrejudgment writs of Attachment for $100,000,000,000,0000,000(One Hundred Trillion Dollars via Loretta E. Lynch“Class Representative,”Million Dollars and prejudgment writ of attachment for  and Judgment against Barak Obama in her official capacity et al for $100,000,000,0000,0000  judgment for its damges with interest  and costs, agisnt the Defenants; and

• That this court grant Plaintiff such other and further relief as the justice of the cause April appear.

• To issue an order to the U.S. Department of Justice Loretta E. Lynchto show cause why she should not be held in criminal and/or civil contempt of court.
• To  attachment of said property pruusant ot he aforesaid provovision of CPLR and FRCP 4(e) and Rule B(1) of the Supplenmtnal Rules for certain Admarility and Maritime claims: and/or
• That process in due form of law, according to the practices of this Honorable Court in causes of admirality and maritime jurisprudence, April issue agains the stem ship, her enginces, tacke appearl. Etc. and that all person having or claiming any interest therein be citized to apper and answer under oath, all and singular the matters aforesaid; that Plaitniff have a deree for its damaged aforesaid, with interest and cost; and that the steamship__________be condemned and sld to stisfy plaintiff decree;
• That process in due form of law April issue against B citing it to appear and answer, under oath, all and singular, the matters aforesaid;
• That the Court order, adjudge and decree that Plaitnifff have a decree against B for claim asserted gy plaintiff herein tooether with interest and costs and 
• That Plaintiff have such other and further relief as April be proper and that this Court s compettnet ot grnt.
• That Plaintiff have such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, under the full range of relevant circumstances which have occasioned the instant action.
• All other relief in which this court may deem just and appropriate.
• The Plaintiff request this court to tranfer and consolidate in this cause  requiring (b) that the Court issue an emergency stay of  enforcement of the decision pending review on the merits in this causeand that the Court review the decision of the Defendants, that  the final administrative  decision be reversed, and for such other relief as this court deems just.
• Accordingly, all premises having been duly considered here, the United States now moves the Honorable Justices of this District Court of Columbia for Loretta E. Lynchto show cause why Extraordinary Writs of Mandamus should not issue, commanding that Circuit Court to perform ‑‑ with all deliberate speed ‑‑ all duties owed to Appellant and/or Committee and Oversight.

• The United States moves for said ORDER, on the strengths of this PETITION and of the official records that are now before this District Court of Columbia, to reinstate a cause erroneously dismissed.

• That process ISSUE AGAINST Loretta E. Lynch be cired to appear and answer the allegatioin of this Complaint.

• Writ in the nature of Quo Warranto to issue upon Loretta E. Lynchin her official capacity as United States Attorney General to demonstrate by what lawful authorities each claims to preside as the United States of American Attorney General .
• All premises having been duly considered, Intervenor respectfully requests this honorable Court to issue a routine ORDER to the U.S. Department of Justice Loretta E. Lynchto show cause why she should not be held in criminal and/or civil contempt of court.
• To appoint Special Prosecutors and/or issue arrest warrants.

• That this Court liberally construe the RICO laws and thereby find and/or declare that all Defendants have associated with a RICO enterprise of persons and of other individuals who were associated in fact, all of whom did engage in, and whose activities did affect, interstate and foreign commerce in violation of the RICO law at 18 U.S.C. 1962(c) (Prohibited activities).

• That this Court liberally construe the RICO laws and thereby find that all Defendants have conducted and/or participated, directly or indirectly, in the affairs of said RICO enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity in violation of the RICO laws at 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961(5) (“pattern” defined) and 1962(c) supra.

• That all Defendants and all of their directors, officers, employees, agents, servants and all other persons in active concert or in participation with them, be enjoined temporarily during pendency of this action, and permanently thereafter, from associating with any RICO enterprise of persons, or of other individuals associated in fact, who do engage in, or whose activities do affect, interstate and foreign commerce.

• That all Defendants and all of their directors, officers, employees, agents, servants and all other persons in active concert or in participation with them, be enjoined temporarily during pendency of this action, and permanently thereafter, from conducting or participating, either directly or indirectly, in the conduct of the affairs of any RICO enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity in violation of the RICO laws at 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961(5) and 1962(c) supra.

• That if Defendant  cannot be found within this District then all of their property within this istrict be attached in the sum of $________________________________, with interest thereon and cost, the sum sued for in this complaint;

• That judgment be entered against the dfenant in the sum of $_________________together with interest and costs; and

• If for any reason it is alleged and/or found that Plaintiff is not entitled to the attachment of the Dfenants property under Admirality principle of foreign attachment, then in the, Plaintiff invokes the rovision of Section 6201 to 6226 of the New Yor CPLR(and/or similar “50 State laws”).
•  
•  
•  
• Title 18 U.S.C. §§ 2(a), 2(b), 1341, 1343, 1346, 1952, 1956, 1957,
• 2314, and 2315.
• ate and prays that this Court order the attachment of said property pruusant ot he aforesaid provovision of CPLR and FRCP 4(e) and Rule B(1) of the Supplenmtnal Rules for certain Admarility and Maritime claims: and
• That Plaintiff April have such other and further relief as in lawq and justice tit April be entitle to receive.

Jugment in the amount of ____________________for claim #1 Libel, order the

             Defendants to immediately pay and issue writs of attachment.

     13..  Jugment in the amount of ____________________for claim #2 Violation of the Equal

              Protection 2^nd amendment and Violation of the Right   to bear Firearms(US

             Constitutional Amendment II), 42 USC SECTION 1983  order the Defendants to

               immediately pay and issue writs of  attachment.

      14..  Judement in the amount of ____________________for claim #3 neglience and order

              The  Defendants to immediately pay and issue writs of attachment.

      15..  Judgment in the amount of ____________________for claim #4 breach of contract 

               and

            order the Defendants to immediately pay and issue writs of attachment.

    16.. Declaratory Judgment declaring that Plaintiff is:

                                 a.  fully vested with the right to prosecute,  via the Private Attorney General

                                      Statue (RICO) and/or collect and/or recover fines et al on  behalf of the

                                     United States Government .

                                 b. Barak H.Obama(AKA Barry Soertoes) and/or “et als,” can not exert

                                      executive privilege, and declare that the Plaintiff may amend her

                                      complaint to add Barak H. Obama in his individually capacity as United

                                      States President.

                                 c.. “The United States ex rel Sharon Bridgewater Private Attorney General

                                         and/or Qui Tam Relator(Claimant et al )is fully  vested with the right to

                                        have a writ of quo warranto issued upon Loretta Lynch in her official

                                     capacity as United States Attorney General.

                                d. That this court adjudge and decree that Lynch and/or Barak H. Obama

                                    violated the “The United States ex rel Sharon Bridgewater Private

                                    Attorney General and/or Qui Tam Relator(Claimant et al )class Plaintiff

 Have the right to pre-judgment attachment in the amount of $!25,000,000,000,000,000.00(Trillion Dollars) for the United States ex rel Sharon Bridgewater Private Attorney General and/or Qui Tam Relator.  $_____________________

e. That the Petiititioner is entitled to a summary judgment.

.

17. .Equitable and/or Injunctive Relief Prejudgment writs of attachment in

        $125,000,000,000,000,000.00 Judgment against Loretta

       Lynch

     THIS COURT USD) to commence Relator’s  rehabilitation  i.e. food, shelter, clothing,  and

      transportation,  payable by the Office of the U.S. Attorney General, District of

       Columbia to the client trust account (Sharon Bridgewater)of the lawyer duly appointed by

    16.. Partial judgment in the amount of $ 1,000,000,000,000,000 MILLION DOLLARS

           AGAINST LORETTA LYNCH IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY.

18.    Partial judgment in the amount of $ ___________________– payment of  ten thousand

           U.S. Dollars ($10,000.00 )

Wherefore, Plaintiff prays;

1.  That process in due form of law, according to the practices of this Honorable Court in causes of admirality and maritime jurisprudence, April issue agains the stem ship, her enginces, tacke appearl. Etc. and that all person having or claiming any interest therein be citized to apper and answer under oath, all and singular the matters aforesaid; that Plaitniff have a deree for its damaged aforesaid, with interest and cost; and that the steamship__________be condemned and sld to stisfy plaintiff decree;
2. That process in due form of law April issue against B citing it to appear and answer, under oath, all and singular, the matters aforesaid;
3. That the Court order, adjudge and decree that Plaitnifff have a decree against B for claim asserted gy plaintiff herein tooether with interest and costs and 
4. That Plaintiff have such other and further relief as April be proper and that this Court s compettnet ot grnt.
5. PREJUDGMENT WRITS OF ATTACHMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $150,000,000

That Plaintiff have such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, under the full range of relevant circumstances which have occasioned the instant action.  Judgment WRIT OF ATTACHMENT in the amount of Plaitniffs damages, tighter with interest thereon form the rrespective dates due, cost, disbursements, and reasonable attorney fees.

1. That process in due form of law according to the practice of this court in cases of admirality and maritime jurisdiction April issue against the Defendant cititng it to apprear and answer all the matters described in this complaint.Plaintiff have such other and further relief in the premises as in law and justice in April be entitled to receive.

SCHEDULE[DESIGNATION OF SCHEDULE]

1.  Defendant’s  Status and addresss:
2. A. Unpon information and belief and at all times hereinafter mentioned, Defendant Barak H. Obama(AKA Barry Soertoes)  class representative was a [type of legaly entity]authorized under the laws of the United States Constition, with offices and a place of business at [Obama address]

DETAILS OF THE _________(S)

1.  Bill of Lading No.{ number of bill} dated {dated of bill of lading – 1993 thru  present] from [name of citiy], [name of county] to [name of city], [name of state] on the vessel [name of vessel], [one(1) container SAID TO CONTAIN: [description of contents], at the applicable tariff charge of $____________dollar amount of ttarriff charge EXhits { of exhibit}

Amount Paid:                                                                        Amount Due:____________

SUMMARY OF DAMAGES

Summary of Reasonable Counsel’s Fees:          TBA

Summary of Consequential Damages:              TBA

Summary of Actual Damages (partial list):

     unpaid professional invoices:        $    108,350.00

     triple damage multiplier (3x):       $    325,050.00

     copyright infringements, actual:     $163,800,000.00

     triple damage multiplier (3x):       $491,400,000.00

     trademark infringements, actual:     $163,800,000.00

     triple damage multiplier (3x):       $491,400,000.00

                                          —————

          Subtotal:                     $1,310,833,400.00

Summary of Punitive Damages (3x):       $3,932,500,200.00

     TOTAL DAMAGES (minimum):           $125,000,000,000,000,000(ONE HUNDRED TRILLION DOLLARS)

INTEREST AMOUNT $_____________________________________+

JUDICIAL NOTICE

SEPARATE STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS

UNDISPUTED FACTS – FINDING AND CONCLUSION OF LAW – 125 TRILLION DOLLARS

NOTICE OF BURIFICATION FOR LIABILITY OF DAMAGES,

DECLARATORY AND SUMMARY ADJUFICATION INSTEAD OF JUDGMENT(-look for form on disk-include summary adjudification of damages-must match complaint, claim via admiralty and maritime claim)”IT IS DECLARED BY “OPERATION OF LAW” “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR IS DECLARED THE UNITED STATES PRESIDENT, VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, THE “SUPREME JUDGE OF THE WORLD AND/OR THE UNITED STATES,”THE LAW MAKE OF THE 50 STATES AND PURSUANT TO THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE CAN INVOKE HER “COMMON LAW” RIGHT AND FORM ANOTHER GOVERNMENT.

NOTICE OF BURIFICATION FOR LIABILITY OF DAMAGES,

NOTICE OF DEMAND TO ALL PARTIES!!

IN THE AMOUNT OF 125,000,000,000,000.00 AS FOLLOWS:

VIA CERTIFIED MAILS AS FOLLOWS:

INSERT RIGHT CERTIFIED MAILS

NOTICE OF DEFAULT

ALL REFUSED TO PAY, FAILED TO PLEAD OR OTHERWISE DEFEND AS SHOWN IN “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR AFFIDIVANT AND ARE IN DEFAULT!!  

DEFAULT JUDGMENT IN REM FOR THE “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR” IN THE AMOUNT OF $125 TRILLION DOLLARS FOR CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD THE U.S.A. FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT – FOR FAILURE TO PLEAD OR OTHERWISE DEFEND(NOTICE OF FORFEITURE OF PROPERTY!!

125, TRILLION IN CURRENCY PLUS INTEREST

NOTICE OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT !!

A FINAL JUDGMENT OR DECREE RENDERED IN THE FAVOR OF THE UNITED STATES PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1964(D)IN ANY CRIMINAL PROCEEDING BROUGHT BY THE UNITED STATES SHALL ESTOP THE DEFENDANTS(JOE BIDEN IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS PRESIDENT, KAMALA HARRIS, ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, MAJOR CORPORATIONS ET AL) FROM DENYING THE ESSENTIAL ALLEGATIONS OF THE CRIMINAL OFFENSE IN ANY SUBSEQUENT CIVIL PROCEEDING BROUGHT BY THE UNITED STATES!!

“THE FOLLOWING PROCEEDING IS BROUGHT BY “THE 50 UNITED STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR VS. JOE BIDEN IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY, KAMALA HARRIS HIS HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY ET AL

comingssoonDownload

DECLARATORY JUDGMENT THAT ALL PARTIES ARE IN DEFAULT/DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND ENTERS A DEFAULT JUDGMENT FOR 125,000,000,000,000,000.00 TRILLION DOLLARS IN FAVOR OF “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR” VS. JOE BIDEN IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS VICE PRESIDENT AND/OR PRESIDENT AND/OR INDIVIDUALLY, KAMALA HARRIS IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA, SENATOR AND/OR VICE PRESIDENT AND/OR INDIVIDUALLY, DONALD TRUMP IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS PRESIDENT AND/OR BUSINESS MAN AND/OR INDIVIDUALLY, MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS CHIEF JUDGE FOR THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS D.C. CIRCUIT AND/OR U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, JOHN G. ROBERTS IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT AND/OR INDIVIDUALLY, STEVEN BREYER IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS U.S. SUPREME COURT JUDGE AND/OR INDIVIDUALLY, CLARENCE THOMAS IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ASSOCIATE JUSTICE FOR THE SUPREME COURT JUDGE AND/OR INDIVIDUAL, SAMUEL A. ALITO JR. IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ASSOCIATE JUSTICE FOR THE SUPREME COURT JUDGE AND/OR INDIVIDUALLY, SONIA SOTOMAYOR IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ASSOCIATE JUSTICE FOR THE SUPREME COURT JUDGE AND/OR INDIVIDUALLY, ELENA KAGAN IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ASSOCIATE JUSTICE FOR THE SUPREME COURT JUDGE AND/OR INDIVIDUALLY, NEIL M. GORSUCH IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ASSOCIATE JUSTICE FOR THE SUPREME COURT JUDGE AND/OR INDIVIDUALLY, BRETT M. KAVANAUGH IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ASSOCIATE JUSTICE FOR THE SUPREME COURT JUDGE, KENTANJI BROWN JACKSON IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ASSOCIATE JUSTICE FOR THE SUPREME COURT JUDGE AND/OR INDIVIDUALLY,

ABSTRACT JUDGMENT

CERTIFICATION OF JUDGMENT

DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AND ADJUDIFICATION OF PROSECUTOR FOR THE U.S.

MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY ENGAGED IN A PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY, COMMITTED ONE OR MORE WIRE FRAUD IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1343 AND/OR 1341 FORFEITS THE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, CONSPIRED WITH DONALD TRUMP, VIOLATED 18 U.S. Code § 2383 – Rebellion or insurrection PURSUANT TO RICO LAW AND FORFEIT THE OFFICE TO “THE UNITED STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR”

A declaratory judgment is a court-issued judgment that defines and outlines the rights and obligations of each party in a contract. Declaratory judgments have the same effect and force as final judgments and are legally binding. These judgments are also called a declaration or declaratory relief.  THIS CASE IS RIPE!!

DECLARATORY JUDGMENT

IT IS SO ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED

   1)That this “COMMON LAW COURT”court adjudge and decree and declare that the rights and legal relations of the parties      to the  subject matter here in controversy, in order that the declaration shall have the force and effect of a final judgment and decree.

2)  That the court enters a judgment declaring that Plaintiff is fully vested with the right to prosecute, via the Private Attorney General Statue (RICO) and/or collect and/or recover fines et al on behalf of the THE 50 STATES IN VIOLATION OF 18 USC SECTION 371.

3) That the court enter judgment declaring the Barak H.Obama(AKA Barry Soertoes) and/or “et als,” can not exert executive privilege.

4) That the court enter judgment declaring the “The United States ex rel Sharon Bridgewater Private Attorney General and/OR Relator(Claimant et al )is fully  vested with the right to have a writ of quo warranto issued upon Loretta Lynch in her official capacity as United States Attorney General.

5) That this court adjudge and decree that Lynch violated the “The United States ex rel Sharon Bridgewater Private Attorney General and/Relator(Claimant et al )class Plaintiff second amendment rights are liable to the Plaintiff for damages.

6) That this court adjudge and decree that the “The United States ex rel Sharon Bridgewater Private Attorney General and/or Relator(Claimant et al )has absolute right to  claim her personal and business property that were illegally stolen and taken without due process of law.

7) That this court adjudge that Loretta Lynch is disqualified to prosecute  Hillary Clinton e-mail as United States Attorney General or her appointment constitute conflict of interest

8) That this court adjudge and decree that the Plaintiff Bridgewater has absolute right to claim her personal and business that this court a

10) Prejudgment writs of attachment for the United States of America and the class Plaintiffs in the amount of $150,000,000,000 Trillion Dollars.

 11) THAT ALL U.S. GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS(IN THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH, LEGISLATIVE BRANCH, AND/OR JUDICIAL BRANCH ARE ARE DISQUALIFIED FROM ANY PROCEEDING

 12) Appoint Special Prosecutors

 13) Declaratory Judgment for the United States and as alleged in cause number III.

 14) Temporary restraining order enjoin

 15) FILE THE ATTACHED EXH. A, B, C AND D

 16) Permit Plaintiff to file a first amended consolidate complaint in intervention to more fully ____________for de-novo review and within 60 days as permitted by law.

1)IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREEDcourt adjudge and decree and declare that the rights and legal relations of the parties      to the  subject matter here in controversy, in order that the declaration shall have the force and effect of a final judgment and decree.

2)  That the court enters a judgment declaring that Plaintiff is fully vested with the right to prosecute, via the Private Attorney General Statue (RICO) and/or collect and/or recover fines et al on behalf of the United States Government the Federal False Claims Act.

3) That the court enter judgment declaring the Barak H.Obama(AKA Barry Soertoes) and/or “et als,” can not exert executive privilege.

4) That the court enter judgment declaring the “The United States ex rel Sharon Bridgewater Private Attorney General and/or Relator(Claimant et al )is fully  vested with the right to have a writ of quo warranto issued upon Loretta Lynch in her official capacity as United States Attorney General.

5) That this court adjudge and decree that Lynch violated the “The United States ex rel Sharon Bridgewater Private Attorney General and/or Qui Tam Relator(Claimant et al )class Plaintiff second amendment rights are liable to the Plaintiff for damages in the amount of $10,000.00.

6) That this court adjudge and decree that the “The United States ex rel Sharon Bridgewater Private Attorney General and/or Qui Tam Relator(Claimant et al )has absolute right to  claim her personal and business property that were illegally stolen and taken without due process of law.

7) That this court adjudge that Loretta Lynch is disqualified to prosecute  Hillary Clinton e-mail as United States Attorney General or her appointment constitute conflict of interest

8) That this court adjudge and decree that the Plaintiff Bridgewater has absolute right to claim her personal and business that this court a

9) Because the Class Plaintiff can not sue an public official in excess of $10,000 pursuant to the enter  partial  judgment for “The United States ex rel Sharon Bridgewater Private Attorney General and/or Relator(Claimant et al )”Class Plaintiff Sharon Bridgewater judgment against Loretta Lynch  and to deliver this partial payment at the Plaintiffs post office box.

10) Prejudgment writs of attachment for the United States of America and the class Plaintiffs in the amount of $150,000,000,000 Trillion Dollars.

 11) Consolidate the hearing with the petition for Habeas Corpus

 12) THAT “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER IS PROSECUTOR

 13) Declaratory Judgment for the United States and as alleged in cause number III.

 14) Temporary restraining order enjoin

 15) FILE THE ATTACHED EXH. A, B, C AND D

 16) Permit Plaintiff to file a first amended consolidate complaint in intervention to more fully ____________for de-novo review and within 60 days as permitted by law.

The Defendant demand Judgment and claim _________against Loretta Lynch in personam Plaintiff (DOJ, ATF, Barak H. Obama et al)for claim

Certify a class

ADMIRALITY AND MARITIME FORMS DIRECTED TO DEFENDANTS AND/OR RESPONDENTS – CLAIMS FOR EXEMPTIONS

ONE OR MORE NOTICE OF WAIVER OF GRAND JURY, GRAND JURY SUBMISSION AND MIRANDA WARNING AS FOLLOWS:

“THE 50 UNITED STATES PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR REQUEST ASSISTANCE AND AUTHORIZE ANY U.S. CITIZEN TO ARREST THE PERPETRATORS FOR THEIR HENIOUS CRIMES AGAINST THE TWO WITNESSES AND HUMANITY AS FOLLOWS:

WRIT OF PROHIBITION

BILL OF PARTICULAR

CLASS ACTION BILL OF IMPEACHMENTS

CLASS-ACTION FORFEITURE OF OFFICE(S) AS FOLLOWS:

CLASS ACTION RETROACTIVE IMPEACHMENT AS FOLLOWS:

DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AND NOTICE OF ALL BIDEN’S EXECUTIVE ORDER’S(AND PREDESSCORS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO HIS TERM IN CONTRACY TO THE U.S. CONSTITUTION, OBAMACARE HEALTH CARE FRAUD, AND ALL EXECUTIVE ORDER VIA PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCIES BASE ON “BIOLOGICAL WARFARE” CREATED BY THE DEFENDANT INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO CORONAVIRUS, MONKEY POX OR ANY OTHER “PATENT” VIRUS –

SEE BELOW PATENTS ARE NULL AND VOID AND WITHOUT ANY LEGAL EFFECT INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE RECENT – DECLARATION OF BIDEN WHICH DECLARE THE MONKEYPOX A PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY

https://www.cnn.com/2022/08/04/politics/monkeypox-public-health-emergency/index.html

(A SCHEME TO PREVENT THE ARREST AND PROSECUTION AND/OR ARREST OF ALL PUBLIC OFFICIALS)

NOTICE OF CRIMINAL AND/OR CIVIL CONTEMPT OF CONGRESS AND ARREST WARRANTS

NURMBERG INDICTMENTS

CLASS-ACTION FORFEITURE OF OFFICE(S) AS FOLLOWS:

CLASS ACTION RETROACTIVE IMPEACHMENT AS FOLLOWS:

DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AND NOTICE OF ALL BIDEN’S EXECUTIVE ORDER’S(AND PREDESSCORS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO HIS TERM IN CONTRACY TO THE U.S. CONSTITUTION, OBAMACARE HEALTH CARE FRAUD, AND ALL EXECUTIVE ORDER VIA PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCIES BASE ON “BIOLOGICAL WARFARE” CREATED BY THE DEFENDANT INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO CORONAVIRUS, MONKEY POX OR ANY OTHER “PATENT” VIRUS –

SEE BELOW PATENTS ARE NULL AND VOID AND WITHOUT ANY LEGAL EFFECT INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE RECENT – DECLARATION OF BIDEN WHICH DECLARE THE MONKEYPOX A PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY

https://www.cnn.com/2022/08/04/politics/monkeypox-public-health-emergency/index.html

(A SCHEME TO PREVENT THE ARREST AND PROSECUTION AND/OR ARREST OF ALL PUBLIC OFFICIALS)

NOTICE OF BIFURCATED TRIAL(CRIMINAL TRIAL BY “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR” CONVICTION AND SENTENCE)

GUILTY OF TREASON, RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY

BIFURCATED TRIAL- NOTICE OF CONVICTION AND SENTENCE

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/bifurcated_trial#:~:text=Bifurcated%20trial%20means%20that%20the,or%20penalties%20in%20the%20second.

Primary tabs

Bifurcated trial means that the tria

in criminal proceedings, the guilt or innocence of the defendant is determined in one stage, and the penalty or insanity is determined in the other. 

Generally, those convicted of Federal Racketeering/RICO crimes are sentenced to a maximum 20 years and $25,000 fines per count. So for a Federal RICO case at least two offenses in a ten-year period must be charged and in many cases, far more specific charges are brought.

NOTICE OF CONVICTION AND SENTENCE OF LIFE IMPRISONMENT WITHOUT PAROLE!!

ADMIRALITY AND/OR MARTIME IN REM ARREST WARRANTS AS FOLLOWS:

NOTICE OF FORFEITURE OF OFFICE!!

REQUEST FOR EXTRADICITION(CLASS ACTION)

“TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

PERMANENT INJUNCTION FOR ILLEGALLY, UNLAWFULLY UPURPING THE PUBLIC OFFICE(S) OF THE UNITED STATES PRESIDENT, U.S. VICE PRESIDENT, U.S. SENATORS, CONGRESSMAN GOVERNORS, ETC. AND PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. CODE § 1651 “ALL

“TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER PERMANENT INJUNCTION FOR ILLEGALLY, UNLAWFULLY UPURPING THE PUBLIC OFFICE(S) OF THE UNITED STATES PRESIDENT, U.S. VICE PRESIDENT, U.S. SENATORS, CONGRESSMAN GOVERNORS, ETC. AND PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. CODE § 1651 “ALL WRITS”

JACOB ROTHCHILD “OWNER AND CONTROL OF MOST IF NOT ALL BANKS, THE U.S. FEDERAL RESERVE,

JACOB ROTHCHILD “OWNER AND CONTROL OF MOST IF NOT ALL BANKS, THE U.S. FEDERAL RESERVE,

DECLARATORY AND SUMMARY JUDGMENTTHE

TO COERCE PEOPLE TO “GLADLY” “RUN-TO THE INVISIBLE TATOO VACCINE DELIVERY PATCH” WHICH IS THE OFFICIAL MARK OF THE BEAST, THAT GIVES THE BODY FURTHER INSTRUCTIONS AND OFFICIAL CHANGES MEN AND WOMEN TO “LUCIFER””RACE” SUBJECT TO TOTAL CONTROL VIA SHOCK, 5G OR 6G

DECLARATORY JUDGMENT BIDEN AND/OR HARRIS IS GUILTY OF TREASON!

ALL HAD LEGAL DUTIES TO CONVICT TRUMP FOR HIS FELONIOUS CRIMINAL ACTS AND FAILED TO AND ALL ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CAPITOL ATTACKS, AIDING, ABETTING TRUMP TO DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESS AND ARE !!

BIDEN AND HARRIS GIVE UP ON U.S. BORDERS, ALLOW “ANY AND EVERYBODY IN THE U.S.A; FAIL TO MAINTAIN OUR U.S. BORDERS!!

bidenharrisborderDownload

KAMALA HARRIS ABANDON THE U.S.A. AND NATIONAL SECURITY BY FAILING TO PROTECT U.S. BORDERS!!

COMES NOW ONE OR MORE “WE THE PEOPLE” VIA”THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR , SHARON BRIDGEWATER AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER WITH “LEGAL” ARTICLE III STANDING(1.HAS AN INJURY-IN-FACT, BY BIDEN, TRUMP, HARRIS, GARLAND, OBAMA, U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, ALL MAJOR DOMESTIC AND FOREIGN “TRANSNATIONAL” CORPORATIONS [FACEBOOK/META, TWITTER, TELSA, GOOGLE, ALIBABA, TENCENT, XIAOMI, DIDI GLOBAL, MICROSOFT, BILL GATES, ET AL, 2. THE INJURY IS FAIRLY TRACEABLE TO THE DEFENDANT’S CHALLENGED ACTION AND, 3.THE INJURY BY SHARON AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER “TWO WITNESSES;” IS ONE THAT COULD BE REDRESSED BY A FAVORABLE JUDICIAL DECISION) AND INVOKE THE GUARANTEE CLAUSE, AND WITH A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER PERMANENT INJUNCTION “AGAINST THE RACKETEERING CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE TAG-TEAMERS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT” TO PREVENT BIDEN AND/OR HARRIS( ET AL GRANTING U.S.A. NATIONAL SOVERIGNTY TO CHINA AND CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES AND/OR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 371 AND WITH “CLASS ACTION” ARTICLE(S) OF IMPEACHMENT,
“TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER PERMANENT INJUNCTION FOR ILLEGALLY, UNLAWFULLY UPURPING THE PUBLIC OFFICE(S) OF THE UNITED STATES PRESIDENT, U.S. VICE PRESIDENT, U.S. SENATORS, CONGRESSMAN GOVERNORS, ETC. AND PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. CODE § 1651 “ALL WRITS”

JACOB ROTHCHILD “OWNER AND CONTROL OF MOST IF NOT ALL BANKS, THE U.S. FEDERAL RESERVE,

noticeofdemandDownload

COMES NOW THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR AND INVOKE THE THE GUARANTEE CLAUSE WHICH REQUIRES THE UNITED STATES TO GUARANTEE TO THE STATES A REPUBLICAN FORM OF GOVERNMENT, AND PROVIDE PROTECTION FROM FOREIGN INVASION AND DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, AND FORM A NEW GOVERNMENT PURSUANT TO THE DECLARATION OF INDEPEND

RETRO-ACTIVE ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT ENTITLED THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR VS. JOE BIDEN IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS PRESIDENT AS FOLLOWS:

bidenarticlesofimpeachmentcurrentlyinprocessofamendmentsDownload

NOTICE OF ADJUDIFICATION – CLASS ACTION WRIT OF QUO WARRANTO!!

IT IS ADJUDGED THAT JOE BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS, MERRICK GARLAND, ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, U.S. CONGRESSMAN, LEGISLATORS, MAJOR CORPORATIONS, I.E. MICROSOFT, FACEBOOK, TELSA, THE FEDERAL RESERVE CHAIR JEROME POWELL, ALL CENTRAL BANKS DIRECTORS, PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES, OFFICERS ETC.

IS GUILTY OF USURPING OR INTRUDING INTO OR UNLAWFULLY HOLD OR EXERCISE THE OFFICE OF THE U.S. PRESIDENCY, THE FRANCHISE OR OFFICE OF THE VICE PRESIDENCY, THE OFFICE OF THE U.S. SUPREME COURT, THE OFFICE OF CORPORATIONS, OFFICE OF PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES ETC. AND IS OUSTED ALTOGETHER FROM AND/OR EXCLUSED FROM THAT OFFICE, FRANCHISE OR PRIVILEGE!!

NOTICE OF ADJUDIFICATION – CLASS ACTION ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT!!!

IT IS ADJUDGED THAT JOE BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS, MERRICK GARLAND, ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, U.S. CONGRESSMAN, LEGISLATORS, MAJOR CORPORATIONS, I.E. MICROSOFT, FACEBOOK, TELSA, THE FEDERAL RESERVE CHAIR JEROME POWELL, ALL CENTRAL BANKS DIRECTORS, PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES, OFFICERS ETC.

IS GUILTY OF IMPEACHED!!

ARE GUILTY TWO OR MORE AND THAT BOTH SHARON AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER WAS INJURED AND HARMED BY BIDEN’S ACTS OR OMISSIONS AND ALSO THAT HIS IS LIABLE FOR DAMAGES!!:

ARREST WARRANT FOR TREASON ENTITLED “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR VS. JOE BIDEN IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ONE OR MORE SENATOR, VICE PRESIDENT AND/OR PRESIDENT

Rule 4. Arrest Warrant or Summons on a ComplaintC

INSIDER TRADING

OVERT ACT

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/bill-prevent-lawmakers-their-spouses-stock-trading-standstill-pelosi-faces-backlash

COMING SOON VIA IN THE NAME OF ONE OR MORE “THE PEOPLE OF THE 50 STATES – COMMON LAW COURTS ETC.” ENTITLED “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERALAND/OR RELATOR” VS. JOE R. BIDEN IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS U.S. PRESIDENT

arrest-warrantDownload

ALL EXECUTIVE ORDER OF BIDEN IS NULL AND VOID WITHOUT ANY LEGAL EFFECT!!

BIDEN

PURSUANT TO “THE LAW, ” 18 U.S. Code § 2383 – Rebellion or insurrection,

Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

Guarantee Clause Protects Right To Vote Without New Federal Legislation

The Constitution protects the right to vote. Disputes about whether voting in the last election was honest or corrupt are not invitations for states to enact laws suppressing voting. The Constitution prohibits denying or abridging voting rights and requires the United State to guarantee that the Republican Form of Government will be protected in every state. The votes of citizens are essential in the Republic Form of Government.  

.

“THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR ON BEHALF OF MYSELF, MY SON, ALL U.S. CITIZENS(MY COUNTRY, THE PEOPLE OF THE 50 STATES AND/OR HUMANITY)

– SEE BELOW PURUSANT TO COMMON LAW REMEDIES VIA ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME “LAW” AND/OR CLAIM ENTITLED SHARON BRIDGEWATER VS. HAYES VALLEY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP(SEE BELOW) APPEARS BEFORE BIDEN, HARRIS(AND PREDESSCORS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THUR TO THEIR TERM), MERRICK GARLAND AND XI JINPING DRAGON

KAMALA HARRIS(AN ASIA-AFRICAN AMERICA-” ADVANCED TO VICE PRESIDENT IN RECORD TIME FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE TO DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES – SHARON AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER”)IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA FROM 2004-2010,(AND ERIC HOLDER IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL

RECEIVED TEN OR MORE COMPLAINTS, CERTIFIED MAILS AND/OR PROOF OF SERVICES FROM SHARON BRIDGEWATER IN REGARDS TO THE U.S. GOVERNMENT EXTORTING MONEY FROM BOTH THE TWO WITNESSES WHILE TENANTS, SHE ALSO KNEW AND WERE AWARE THAT BOTH WERE U.S. CITIZENS, MINORITY “REAL ESTATE BUSINESS OWNERS” DISCRIMINATED AGAINST …..SEE BELOW, ALSO KNEW AND WERE AWARE THAT THE TWO WITNESSES(SHARON & JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER) WERE VICTIMS AND WITNESSES OF OF U.S. GOVERNMENT RACKETEERING(BREACH OF CONTRACT, EXTORTION, ETC.)

scanned-image_05-31-2022-120437Download

ON OR ABOUT AUGUST 2008 AND CONTINUING THRU PRESENT KAMALA HARRIS IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

KNEW AND WERE AWARE THE CLAIMANTS AND/OR PLAINTIFFS KNEW AND WERE AWARE THAT BOTH WITNESSES WERE WORTH 125 TRILLION DOLLARS, WAS GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE A FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AS FOLLOWS:

scanned-image_05-31-2022-185335Download

ON OR ABOUT AUGUST 2008 BIDEN HARRIS HAD A LEGAL DUTY TO QUIT HER JOB, WITHDRAW FROM THE CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE, INSTEAD SHE CAME TO THE MEETING TO THE MIND, ENTERED INTO AN UNLAWFUL AGREEMENT WITH DONALD TRUMP A REAL ESTATE TYCOON BUSINESSMAN AT THE TIME(TO ACCUMULATE REAL ESTATE, RATIFIED, APPROVED AND OR OR ABOUT AUGUST 2008 AND CONTINUING THRU PRESENT CONSPIRED WITH ONE OR MORE OBAMA, ERIC HOLDER, TRUMP, GARLAND ETC. KNOWINLY ENGAGED IN CONDUCT CAUSING BODILY INJURY AND/OR HARM TO BOTH SHARON AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER OR DAMAGED AND DAMAGED THE TANGIBLE PROPERTY OF BOTH WITNESSES WITH THE INTENT TO RETAILATE, FOR THE ATTENDANCE OF BOTH WITNESSES OR GIVING ONE OR MORE RECORD, DOCUMENTS OF “EXTORTION,” WIRE FRAUD, ETC. ENTITLED SHARON BRIDGEWATER VS. HAYES VALLEY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S. Code § 1513. IN FURTHERANCE OF KAMALA HARRIS, HOLDER , BIDEN, OBAMA CONSPIRACY, ALSO KNOWINGLY, INTENTIONALLY KILLED ONE OR MORE OF MY FRIEND AND/OR WITNESS(ES) WITH THE INTENT TO PREVENT THE ATTENDANCE OR TESTIMONY OF THEM IN OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS(PUBLIC COURT)ENTITLED SHARON BRIDGEWATER VS. MARY AND ROGER TONNA – ALAMEDA COUNTY COURT IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S. Code § 1512 – Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant) ACT IN JOINT PARTICIPATION WITH ONE OR MORE OBAMA, BIDEN, XI JINPING, U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES,

ON OR ABOUT JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO AUGUST 2008 CONTINUING THRU PRESENT ALL PUBLIC OFFICIALS, JOE BIDEN(“BARAK H. OBAMA EXTENTION”)BARAK H. OBAMA, GEORGE H. BUSH, WILLIAM BILL CLINTON, HILLARY CLINTON, GEORGE W. BUSH, U.S. CONGRESSMAN, SENATORS, GOVERNORS THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITIES, U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICE AND OTHER U.S. COURT JUDGES, MERRICK GARLAND(INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO “TRANSNATIONAL” MAJOR CORPORATIONS DIRECTORS, OFFICERS, ETC. CAME TO THE MEETING OF THE MINDS TO ACT UNDER THE COLOR STATE LAW, ACT IN THEIR INDIVIDUAL CAPACITIES ENGAGE IN A PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY, ABUSE THEIR POWER AND POSITIONS AS PUBLIC OFFICIALS, DISCRIMINATE AGAINST BOTH SHARON AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER TWO “SOCIOECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED “FORMER” REAL ESTATE BUSINESS OWNERS(ONE OF WHICH WAS A REAL ESTATE BROKER IN CALIFORNIA)ENGAGED IN FOREIGN AND INTERSTATE COMMERCE, DENY AND/OR DEPRIVE BOTH WITNESSES EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAWS AND/OR EQUAL PRIVELDGES AND IMMUNITIES, VIOLATE FIVE OR MORE OF THE WITNESSES, 1ST, 2ND, 4TH, 5TH, 6TH, 8TH, 9TH, 13TH AND/OR 14TH U.S. CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, FALSELY IMPRISION, FALSELY ARREST, HARRASS, LIBEL, ISSUE VOID ORDERS(JUDICIAL RACKETEERING), COMMIT FRAUD FRABRUCATE A CASE ENTITLED SHARON BRIDGEWATER VS. DONALD TRUMP, DISMISS 45 AS FOLLOWS, DEPRIVE BRIDGEWATER RIGHT TO FILE A FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT OR MORE CASES COMMIYON THE COURT, LAUNDER MONEY,

oneormorecasesdismissedDownload

COMMIT HUNDREDS OF CRIMINAL ACTS IN VIOLATION OF STATE LAW-“COMPLETE LAWLESSNESS” ACT IN JOINT PARTICIPATION WITH ONE OR MORE JACOB ROTHCHILD, VLADIMIR PUTIN, BORIS JOHNSON, ANGELA MERKEL, EMMANUEL MACRON, ETC. DOANLD TRUMP A “REAL ESTATE TYCOON” BUSINESS MAN, COMMIT ELECTION FRAUD(AND/OR VOTERS FRAUD), FABRICATE RUSSIA 2016 INTERFERENCE, “TWO SHAM” E-

MAIL/LAPTOP(HILLARY AND HUNTER BIDEN INVESTIGATIONS),

“SHAM” SPECIAL PROSECUTORS(RUSSIA INTERFERENCE IN 2016 ELECTIONS, ONE OR MORE ROBERT MUELLER, JOHN DURHAM – AND “1-5000 DOES DEFENDANTS PROSECUTORS), MAKE DONALD TRUMP PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES ACT IN JOINT PARTICIPATION WITH CHINA’S XI JINPING, PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES AND DR. FAUCCI JACOB ROTHCHILD, VLADIMIR PUTIN, BORIS JOHNSON, ANGELA MERKEL, EMMANUEL MACRON, ETC.) AND OTHERS “UNLEASH” THE DEADLY CORONAVIRUS BIOLOGICAL WARFARE ON HUMANITY, FRABRUCATE A PANDEMIC(COMMIT GENOCIDE ON HUMANITY), DENY BOTH WITNESSES, U.S. CITIZENS AND/OR HUMANITY 1ST AMENDMENT U.S. CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT(CENSORSHIP)DEFRAUD BOTH SHARON AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER OUT OF 125 TRILLION DOLLARS(TO FUND THE “GLOBAL COV-19 INJECTION). SUBSEQUENTLY ACT IN JOINT PARTICIPATION WITH ONE OR MORE JOE BIDEN AND/OR KAMALA HARRIS(“SHAM” OVERTURN OF 2020 ELECTIONS – FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE TO OVERTHROW THE U.S. GOVERNMENT BY VIOLENCE VIA THE JAN. 6, 2021 CAPITOL ATTACKS AND ATTACKED “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL(A REPRESENTATIVE AND/OR OFFICER OF THE 50 STATES IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S. Code § 2385),” ACT IN JOINT PARTICIPATION WITH GRANT CHINA SOVER AND CONSPIRED WITH TRUMP TO ; AND CONSPIRED WITH BIDEN TO HAND U.S. SOVER(ALL REPRESENTATIVES AND CONGRESSMAN AIDED, ABETTED TRUMP AND/OR BIDEN – “STOOD BY AND DID NOTHING,” IT WAS ONLY WHEN “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR POSTED THIS WEBSITE “THEY(U.S. REPRESENTATIVES AND CONGRESSMAN “STEPPED” UP AND ACT LIKE THEY WERE AGAINST AND/OR AGAINST BIDEN AND/OR TRUMPS ET AL BEHAVIOR) AND ALL LOST THEIR REPRESENTATIVE CAPACITIES AS PUBLIC OFFICIALS(ALL ILLEGALLY, UNLAWFULLY UPURP PUBLIC OFFICE)!!

NOV. 19. 2021

BIDEN TRANSFER POWER TO HARRIS U.S. SUPREME COURT JUDGES “UNDER SEAL DOCUMENTS, FRAUDULANT U.S. SUPREME COURT JUDGMENT – ” ATTEMPT TO DERAUD VIA ONE OR MORE Donald Trump and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis(Trump Real Estate Partner)

https://www.cnn.com/2021/11/19/politics/trump-desantis-relationship/index.html

 ACT IN JOINT PARTICIPATION WITH ONE OR MORE  

biden-transfers-power-to-kamala-harris-while-he-undergoes-colonoscopyDownload

MERRICK GARLAND, K.B. JACKSON, DONALD TRUMP TO COMMIT FRAUD ON THE COURT, EXPLOIT TWO WITNESSES, ADVANCE THE CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE BY UPURPING THE OFFICE OF SENATOR, VICE PRESIDENT AND SUBSEQUENTLY THE U.S. PRESIDENT FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE TO ACT IN JOINT PARTICIPATION WITH ONE OR MORE BIDEN, TO GRANT U.S.A. NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY TO CHINA, ACT IN JOINT PARTICIPATION WITH ONE OR MORE GARLAND OR TRUMP(18 U.S. Code § 2383 – Rebellion or insurrection ATTACKS ON THE STATE CAPITOL) COMMIT AND/OR DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES OF 125 TRILLION SHE ALSO KNEW AND WERE AWARE KNEW AND WERE AWARE THAT BOTH WITNESSES WERE WORTH 125 TRILLION DOLLARS,

injunctionwrit-needtoamendDownload

THE CHANCES OF A DONALD TRUMP PROSECUTION FOR HIS ACTS OR OMISSIONS AND ATTACKS ON THE CAPITOL JAN. 6, 2021 AND FOR VIOLATIONS OF 18 U.S. Code § 2383 – Rebellion or insurrection, TREASON IS ZERO(THEY MERRICK GARLAND, KAMALA HARRIS, JOE BIDEN, U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES WILL NOT “THROW AWAY” THEIR CHANCE OF OBTAINING 125 TRILLION DOLLARS)!! ALL ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE JAN. 6, 2021 CAPITOL ATTACKS – SEE BELOW! ALL ARE INELIGIBLE TO HOLD PUBLIC OFFICE! THE DEFENANTS AND/OR RESPONDENTS ALL ACTED IN JOINT PARTICIPATION AND/OR CONSPRIRED AND VIOLATION,

COMES NOW THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR AND INVOKE THE THE GUARANTEE CLAUSE WHICH REQUIRES THE UNITED STATES TO GUARANTEE TO THE STATES A REPUBLICAN FORM OF GOVERNMENT, AND PROVIDE PROTECTION FROM FOREIGN INVASION AND DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, AND FORM A NEW GOVERNMENT PURSUANT TO THE DECLARATION OF INDEPEND

“THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR ON BEHALF OF MYSELF, MY SON, ALL U.S. CITIZENS(MY COUNTRY, THE PEOPLE OF THE 50 STATES AND/OR HUMANITY)PURSUANT TO THE

Guarantee Clause

Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution states that “The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.” Scholars believe that this clause ensures that each state be run as a representative democracy, as opposed to a monarchy or a dictatorship. Courts, however, have been reluctant to specify what exactly a republican form of government means, leaving that decision exclusively to Congress.

This section also gives Congress the power (and obligation) to protect the states from an invasion by a foreign country or from significant violent uprisings within each state. It authorizes the legislature of each state (or the executive, if the legislature cannot be assembled in time) to request federal help with riots or other violence. – The United States Constitution, What It Says, What It Means, A Hip Pocket Guide

Guarantee Clause Protects Right To Vote Without New Federal Legislation

The Constitution protects the right to vote. Disputes about whether voting in the last election was honest or corrupt are not invitations for states to enact laws suppressing voting. The Constitution prohibits denying or abridging voting rights and requires the United State to guarantee that the Republican Form of Government will be protected in every state. The votes of citizens are essential in the Republic Form of Government.

PURSGUMY DUTY AS A U.S. CITIZEN(TO FORM A NEW GOVERNMENT PURSANT TO THE DECLARATION OF INDENDENCE VIA BIDEN, HARRIS, TRUMP, U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES TREASON, CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT GENOCIDE ON U.S. CITIZENS ETC. – SEE BELOW PURUSANT TO COMMON LAW REMEDIES VIA ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME “LAW” AND/OR CLAIM ENTITLED SHARON BRIDGEWATER VS. HAYES VALLEY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP(SEE BELOW)

Guarantee Clause Protects Right To Vote Without New Federal Legislation

The Constitution protects the right to vote. Disputes about whether voting in the last election was honest or corrupt are not invitations for states to enact laws suppressing voting. The Constitution prohibits denying or abridging voting rights and requires the United State to guarantee that the Republican Form of Government will be protected in every state. The votes of citizens are essential in the Republic Form of Government.  

.

COMES NOW ONE OR MORE”THE UNITED STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR” SHARON BRIDGEWATER AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER PURSUANT TO THE RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATION ACT AND/OR ADMIRALITY AND/OR MARITIME LAW AND PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE RULE 8 AND FILES THIS SHORT AND PLAIN STATEMENT : WITH THIS “CLASS ACTION PROSECUTION” AS FOLLOWS:

CLASS

EVERY U.S. CITIZEN OWE A DUTY TO HELP “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR AND PURSUANT TO THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE FORM A NEW GOVERNMENT AND SAVE OUR COUNTRY, FROM COMMUNIST RULE AND TO ARREST THESE TREASONOUS OFFICIALS!!

DECLARATORY JUDGMENT!!

ALL PUBLIC EMPLOYEES AND MAJOR TRANSNATIONAL CORPORATIONS VIOLATED THE RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATION ACT, ARE ONE OR MORE UNLAWFULLY EMPLOYED AND/OR ASSOCIATED WITH AN”INTERNATIONAL/TRANSNATION BIOTERRORIST ENTERPRISE ENGAGED IN OR ACTIVIITES AFFECTED AND CONTINUE TO AFFECT, INTERSTATE AND FOREIGN COMMERCE, CONDUCTED AND CONTINUE TO CONDUCT OR PARTICIPATED AND CONTINUE TO PARTICIPATE, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, IN THE CONDUCT OF SUCH ENTERPRIZE AFFAIRS THROUGH A PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY OR COLLECTION OF UNLAWFUL DEBT IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C.A. § 1962(c) ARE GUILTY TWO OR MORE AND THAT BOTH SHARON AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER WAS INJURED AND HARMED BY BIDEN’S ACTS OR OMISSIONS AND ALSO THAT HIS IS LIABLE FOR DAMAGES!!:

ALL FUTURE ELECTIONS INCLUDING THE 2024 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS ARE NULL AND VOID WITHOUT ANY LEGAL EFFECT(AS LONG AS BIDEN, HARRIS, TRUMP AND THOSE OPERATING UNDER THEIR DIRECTION I.E. , RACKETEERING PERSONS AS DEFINED IN 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1961(3) ET AL REMAINS IN PUBLIC OFFICE DUE TO THE CONSPIRACY WITH PUTIN, ET AL TO COMMIT ELECTION FRAUD TO DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES

PURSUANT TO MY RIGHT VIA “ADMIRALITY AND/OR MARITIME LAW” – “COMMON LAW REMEDY,” COMES NOW “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR ISSUES THIS “CLASS ACTION WRIT OF QUO WARRANT” AGAINST BIDEN, HARRIS, U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, U.S. CONGRESSMAN AND/OR REPRESENTATIVES”

THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE IS ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT DOCUMENTS IN THE HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES, AND THE OFFICIAL ACT TAKEN DECLARING INDEPENDENCE OF BRITISH RULE(“AND/OR CHINA COMMUNIST RULE”)!!

DECLARATORY JUDGMENT!!

BASED ON THE FOLLOWING:

DECLARATORY JUDGMENT!!

“CLASS ACTION WRIT OF QUO WARRANT” AGAINST BIDEN, HARRIS, U.S. CONGRESSMAN AND REPRESENTATIVES”THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE IS ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT DOCUMENTS IN THE HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES, AND THE OFFICIAL ACT TAKEN DECLARING INDEPENDENCE OF BRITISH RULE(“AND/OR CHINA COMMUNIST RULE”)!!

RETROACTIVE IMPEACHMENT FOR KAMALA HARRIS IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR SAN FRANCISCO CALIFORNIA, U.S. SENATOR AND/OR VICE PRESIDENT

kamalaharrisarticlesofimpeachmentcurrentlyinprocessofamendmentsDownload

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION – IN RE “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR VS. KAMALA HARRIS IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA, U.S. SENATOR AND/OR VICE PRESIDENT – ENJOIN K. HARRIS FROM ILLEGALLY, UNLAWFULLY UPSURPING THE OFFICE OF ONE OR MORE VICE PRESIDENT AND/OR PRESIDENCY AND PREVENT KAMALA HARRIS FROM “OCCUPYING THE OFFICE OF THE U.S. PRESIDENCY

DECLARATORY JUDGMENT THAT KAMALA HARRIS,

§2385. Advocating overthrow of Government

Whoever knowingly or willfully advocates, abets, advises, or teaches the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying the government of the United States or the government of any State, Territory, District or Possession thereof, or the government of any political subdivision therein, by force or violence, or by the assassination of any officer of any such government; AND IS INELIBLE TO HOLD OFFICE AS THE U.S. PRESIDENT!!

(CONTENDS HE CAN ACT IN JOINT PARTICIPATION WITH BIDEN, GRANT U.S.A. SOVERIGNTY TO CHINA, FAIL TO PROTECT BORDER, ADVOCATE TO OVERTHROW THE U.S. GOVERNMENT AND/OR “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR” BY VIOLENCE, OPPRESSION, CONSPIRACY TO DEPRIVE RIGHTS AS DEFINED IN 18 U.S.C. SECTION 241 AND/OR 18 U.S.C. SECTION 242, DEFRAUD THE U.S.A. IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 371, TWO WITNESSES OUT OF MONEY AND/OR PROPERTY IS INELIGIBLE TO HOLD OFFICE AS THE UNITED STATES PRESIDENT FOR RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY, TREASON AND CONSPIRACY WITH DONALD TRUMP TO DEFRAUD TWO WITNESSES AND/OR REBELLION AND INSURRECTION – JAN. 6, 2021 CAPITOL ATTACKS

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION FROM “ACTING, UPSURPING THE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES PRESIDENT AS FOLLOWS:

tropermanentinjunctionkamalaharrisDownload

RETROACTIVE IMPEACHMENT FOR MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS CHIEF JUDGE FOR THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS D.C. CIRCUIT AND/OR ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA!!

kamalaharrisarticlesofimpeachmentcurrentlyinprocessofamendmentsDownload

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION – IN RE “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR VS. MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS CHIEF JUDGE FOR U.S. COURT OF APPEALS D.C. CIRCUIT AND/OR ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA – ENJOIN MERRICK GARLAND FROM ILLEGALLY, UNLAWFULLY UPSURPING THE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL AND PREVENT MERRICK GARLAND FROM “OCCUPYING THE OFFICE OF THE U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL”

DECLARATORY JUDGMENT THAT MERRICK GARLAND IS GUILTY OF REBELLION AND CONSPIR,

§2385. Advocating overthrow of Government

Whoever knowingly or willfully advocates, abets, advises, or teaches the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying the government of the United States or the government of any State, Territory, District or Possession thereof, or the government of any political subdivision therein, by force or violence, or by the assassination of any officer of any such government; AND IS INELIBLE TO HOLD OFFICE AS THE U.S. PRESIDENT!!

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION FROM “ACTING, UPSURPING THE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES PRESIDENT AS FOLLOWS:

_______________________

trump-acquitted-by-senate-in-impeachment-trial-bbc-newsDownload

FEBRUARY 2020 – 1ST TRUMP ACQUITTAL!!

FEBRUARY 2020 – 1ST TRUMP ACQUITTAL!!

trump-acquitted-by-senate-in-impeachment-trial-bbc-newsDownload

FEBRUARY 2020 – 1ST TRUMP ACQUITTAL!!

ALL HAD LEGAL DUTIES TO CONVICT TRUMP FOR HIS FELONIOUS CRIMINAL ACTS AND FAILED TO AND ALL ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CAPITOL ATTACKS, AIDING, ABETTING TRUMP TO DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESS AND ARE !!

JAN. 6, 2021 TRUMP

REBELLION OR INSURRECTION 18 U.S. Code § 2383(HE HAD A LEGAL DUTY AS PRESIDENT TO CALL THE NATIONAL GUARDS TO PROTECT OUR U.S. CAPITOL)AND FAILED TO!! TRUMP IS GUILTY OF AIDING, ABETTING PUTIN 2016 ELECTIONS, AND

JAN. 6, 2021 TRUMP

REBELLION OR INSURRECTION 18 U.S. Code § 2383(HE HAD A LEGAL DUTY AS PRESIDENT TO CALL THE NATIONAL GUARDS TO PROTECT OUR U.S. CAPITOL)AND FAILED TO!! TRUMP IS GUILTY OF AIDING, ABETTING PUTIN 2016 ELECTIONS, AND

prev | next

BIDEN SWORN IN ON JAN. 20, 2021

ONE OR MORE SESSION, LYNCH, HOLDER, GARLAND, KETANJI BROWN JACKSON KNOWINGLY, INTENTIONALLY, CONSPIRED AND CONTINUES TO CONSPIRE WITH ONE OR MORE CLERK OF THE COURT, BIDEN, HARRIS, OBAMA, HOLDER, MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS D.C. CIRCUIT, ONE OR MORE Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell, District Judge Amy Berman Jackson, Senior Judge Thomas F. Hogan, Senior Judge Royce C. Lamberth, Senior Judge Paul L. Friedman, Senior Judge Emmet G. Sullivan, Senior Judge Reggie B. Walton, Senior Judge John D. Bates, Senior Judge Richard J. Leon, Senior Judge Barbara J. Rothstein, KETANJI BROWN JACKSON IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITES AS U.S. FEDERAL JUDGE FOR THE D.C. CIRCUIT AND/OR U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE D.C. CIRCUIT ALL CAME TO THE MEETING OF THE MINDS, ENTERED INTO AN ULAWFUL AGREEMENT WITH WILLIAM BARR, DONALD TRUMP ET AL TO CONCEAL KNOWN FACTS UNDER A DUTY TO DISCLOSE, COMMIT FRAUD ON THE COURT, ISSUE ONE OR MORE “VOID JUDGMENT WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW,” DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES AS FOLLOWS  voluntarily and intentionally devised or participated in a scheme to defraud THE TWO WITNESSES out of money WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW; AND DID SO WITH THE intent to defraud AND KNEW THAT interstate wire communications would be used; and DID IN FACT USE interstate wire communications were in fact used- WIRE FRAUD BY ISSUING ONE OR MORE OPINIONS AS FOLLOWS AND/OR ISSUING ONE OR MORE JUDGMENT AND/OR ORDER ENTITLED BIDEN VS. TEXAS(CONSOLIDATED WITH ONE OR MORE SHARON BRIDGEWATER VS. DONALD TRUMP ETC. – FRAUD ON COURT ETC.)IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1343 AS FOLLOWS:

U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICE CONCEAL KNOWN FACTS, COMMIT WIRE AND MAIL FRAUD, FRAUD ON THE COURT(“PASSED” DOCUMENTS TO EACH OTHER “UNDER SEAL” – PURSUANT TO FEDERAL OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Joinder is a process by which parties and claims are added to an ongoing lawsuit.

Rule 19. Required Joinder of Parties(THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES ONE OR MORE BIDEN AND/OR HARRIS JOIN TRUMP LAWSUIT)

FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE RULE 19. REQUIRED JOINDER OF PARTIES(JOINDER OF U.S. PRESIDENTS – BIDEN AND/OR HARRIS TO ON-GOING LITIGATION – LAWSUIT ENTITLED SHARON BRIDGEWATER VS. DONALD TRUMP VIA MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS CHIEF JUDGE FOR THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FRAUD ON THE COURT,

AND SCHEME TO DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES

IMPEACHMENT OF THE U.S. PRESIDENT PERMITS ONE OR MORE BIDEN, HARRIS OR TRUMP(IN THEIR INDIVIDUAL CAPACITIES TO “REPLACE” THE TWO WITNESSES AS PLAINTIFF’S PURSUANT TO FRCP YOU CAN BE EITHER A PLAINTIFF OR DEFENDANT IN A JOINDER AS FOLLOWS(2) Joinder by Court Order. If a person has not been joined as required, the court must order that the person be made a party. A person who refuses to join as a plaintiff may be made either a defendant or, in a proper case, an involuntary plaintiff). THE DEFENDANTS KNOWINGLY, INTENTIONALLY, WILLFULLY 1) scheme to defraud by means of false pretenses, (2) AND BIDEN, HARRIS, TRUMP, GARLAND ET AL knowing and willful participation in scheme with intent to defraud THE TWO WITNESSES, and (3) use of interstate wire communications AND/OR U.S. MAIL in furtherance of scheme IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1343 AND/OR 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1341 OBTAIN MONEY AND/OR PROPERTY WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW) TO DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES OUT OF MONEY

JAN 20, 2021 –

BIDEN 1ST DAY IN OFFICE – “OBAMA’S EXTENTION” VIA OBAMACARE) JOINS THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION(WHO). BIDEN AND/OR HARRIS ET AL ALL CAME TO THE MEETING OF THE MIND, ENTERED INTO AN UNLAWFUL AGREEMENT WITH ONE OR MORE TRUMP, FAUCCI, PUTIN, ET AL AND REJOINED, GRANT CHINA NATIONAL SOVER THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION AND CONSPIRES WITH XI JINPING AND/OR WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION TEDROS ADHANOM GHEBREYESUS PRESIDENT(“A MARXIST TERRORIST”)

biden-inauguration_-us-rejoins-world-health-organization-and-paris-climate-accord-with-new-executive-order-voxDownload

biden-rejoins-world-health-organization_-what-it-means-for-us-covidDownload

https://apnews.com/article/us-who-support-006ed181e016afa55d4cea30af236227

JAN. 21, 2021

ONE DAY LATER, -CLICK HERE-SCHEME TO DEFRAUD TWO WITNESSES VIA TRUMP, HARRIS, BIDEN CONSPIRACY AND IMPEACHMENT- REMOVAL FROM OFFICE FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE TO OBTAIN A JUDGMENT FOR 125 TRILLION AND DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES OUT OF MONEY AND/OR PROPERTY WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW VIA JUDICAL RACKETEERING, WIRE FRAUD, ABUSE OF U.S. COURT, ETC.

JAN. 21, 2021

ONE DAY LATER, ONE OR MORE U.S. REPRESENTATIVES AND/OR CONGRESSMAN ONIMPEACHED AND/OR ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT INTRODUCED AGAINST BIDEN ON OR ABOUT 1ST DAY OF OFFICE AS PRESIDENT FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE TO CONSOLIDATE LAWSUITS AND/OR JOINDER OF PARTIES ENTITLED SHARON BRIDGEWATER VS. DONALD TRUMP(WIRE FRAUD VIA MERRICK GARLAND)AS FOLLOWS:

impeachmentbidenDownload

On Jan. 20, 2021 AND/OR JAN. 21, 2021

JOE BIDEN APPOINTS DR. ANTHONY FAUCI(XI JINPING WUHAM LAB – CORONAVIRUS GRANT RECEIPENT”-SEE THIS WEBPAGE) AS HEAD OF THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE TO REPRESENT THE UNITED STATES.

BIOLOGICIAL WARFARE CO-CONSPIRATOR

https://www.bitchute.com/embed/sxF6QoEjDzt1/?feature=oembed#?secret=anvizP2j4MALSO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MONKEY POX AS FOLLOWS:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-07-24/monkeypox-proves-elusive-foe-as-who-sounds-alarm-on-global-spread

IN THREE DAY TIME BOTH BIDEN IS IMPEACHED AS PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AND DONALD TRUMP IS “RETROACTIVELY IMPEACHED AS PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IN A “SCHEME TO DEFRAUD TWO WITNESSES VIA WIRE FRAUD, FRAUD ON THE COURT” OBTAINING A 125 TRILLION DOLLAR JUDGMENT “UNDER SEAL”

JAN. 25, 2021

DONALD TRUMP RETROACTIVELY IMPEACHED!!

DONALD TRUMP IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS PRESIDENT(RECEIVED IN THE U.S. SENATE ON JAN. 25, 2021 ONLY THREE DAY(3)DAY LATER AFTER BIDEN ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT, DONALD TRUMP IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY IS IMPEACHED “AGAIN” A SECOND TIME, “RETRO-ACTIVELY” AS FOLLOWS:

text-h.res_.24-117th-congress-2021-2022_-impeaching-donald-john-trump-president-of-the-united-states-for-high-crimes-and-misdemeanors.-_-congress.gov-_-library-of-congressDownload

JAN. 22, 2021 KAMALA HARRIS “SUDDENLY” ACCUMULATES REAL ESTATES AND “SECRETLY” JOINS THE LAWSUIT(CRIMINALS – U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES SECRETLY ENTER JUDGMENTS ENTITLED SHARON BRIDGEWATER VS. DONALD TRUMP – UNDER SEAL WITH BIDEN AND TRUMP TO PROMOTE THE CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE IN FURTHERANCE OF A SCHEME TO DEFRAUD TWO WITNESSES AND/OR SHE

kamalaharrisaccumulatesrealestate-photosDownload

FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE TO CONSOLIDATE LAWSUIT(S) WITH ONE OR MORE FRAUD ON THE COURT LAWSUIT(S) IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS BIDEN AND/OR KAMALA HARRIS “UNDER SEAL” TO DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES “SECOND” TIME – WIRE MAIL FRAUD

FEBRUARY 13, 2021 – 2ND TRUMP

FEBRUARY 2020 – 1ST TRUMP ACQUITTAL!!

BIDEN IS RESPONSIBLE FOR HIS CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES AND IS ALSO RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CAPITOL 6, 2021 AND ELECTION FRAUD ETC.

DECLARATORY JUDGMENT – CONTENDS THAT HE CAN ACT AS PRESIDENT, GRANT CHINA U.S.A. SOVEIGNITY BASED ON A “PLANDEMIC” COMMIT FRAUD, DEFRAUD THE U.S.A OUT OF MONEY AND/OR PROPERTY BIDEN, HARRIS ARE GUILTY OF RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY, CONSPIRING WITH CHINA, SCHEME TO DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES, VIOLATIONS OF AO IS GUILTY OF TREASON, RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY AND GEONOCIDE

UNLAWFULLY EMPLOYED AND/OR ASSOCIATED WITH AN”INTERNATIONAL/TRANSNATION BIOTERRORIST ENTERPRISE ENGAGED IN OR ACTIVIITES AFFECTED AND CONTINUE TO AFFECT, INTERSTATE AND FOREIGN COMMERCE, CONDUCTED AND CONTINUE TO CONDUCT OR PARTICIPATED AND CONTINUE TO PARTICIPATE, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, IN THE CONDUCT OF SUCH ENTERPRIZE AFFAIRS THROUGH A PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY OR COLLECTION OF UNLAWFUL DEBT IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C.A. § 1962(c) ARE GUILTY TWO OR MORE AND THAT BOTH SHARON AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER WAS INJURED AND HARMED BY BIDEN’S ACTS OR OMISSIONS AND ALSO THAT HIS IS LIABLE FOR DAMAGES!!:

• TREASON IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S. Code § 2381
• MISPRISION OF TREASON IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S. Code § 2382
• MISPRISION OF FELONY IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S. Code § 4
• SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S. Code § 2384
• RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION
• VIOLENT CRIMES IN ADI OF RACKETEERING ACTITY IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S. Code § 1959
• BRIBERY OF PUBLIC OFFICIALS AND/OR WITNESSES IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S. Code § 201
• and a host of other unlawful felonious & racketeering acts(too many to name) including
• REBELLION OR INSURRECTION 18 U.S. Code § 2383

RETRO-ACTIVE ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT ENTITLED THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR VS. JOE BIDEN IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS PRESIDENT AS FOLLOWS:

bidenarticlesofimpeachmentcurrentlyinprocessofamendmentsDownload

ARREST WARRANT FOR TREASON ENTITLED “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER VS. JOE BIDEN IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ONE OR MORE SENATOR, VICE PRESIDENT AND/OR PRESIDENT

Rule 4. Arrest Warrant or Summons on a Complaint

Primary tabs

(a) Issuance. If the complaint or one or more affidavits filed with the complaint establish probable cause to believe that an offense has been committed and that the defendant committed it, the judge must issue an arrest warrant to an officer authorized to execute it. At the request of an attorney for the government, the judge must issue a summons, instead of a warrant, to a person authorized to serve it. A judge may issue more than one warrant or summons on the same complaint. If an individual defendant fails to appear in response to a summons, a judge may, and upon request of an attorney for the government must, issue a warrant. If an organizational defendant fails to appear in response to a summons, a judge may take any action authorized by United States law.

(b) Form.

(1) Warrant. A warrant must:

(A) contain the defendant’s name or, if it is unknown, a name or description by which the defendant can be identified with reasonable certainty;

(B) describe the offense charged in the complaint;

(C) command that the defendant be arrested and brought without unnecessary delay before a magistrate judge or, if none is reasonably available, before a state or local judicial officer; and

(D) be signed by a judge.

(2) Summons. A summons must be in the same form as a warrant except that it must require the defendant to appear before a magistrate judge at a stated time and place.

(c) Execution or Service, and Return.

(1) By Whom. Only a marshal or other authorized officer may execute a warrant. Any person authorized to serve a summons in a federal civil action may serve a summons.

(2) Location. A warrant may be executed, or a summons served, within the jurisdiction of the United States or anywhere else a federal statute authorizes an arrest. A summons to an organization under Rule 4(c)(3)(D) may also be served at a place not within a judicial district of the United States.

(3) Manner.

(A) A warrant is executed by arresting the defendant. Upon arrest, an officer possessing the original or a duplicate original warrant must show it to the defendant. If the officer does not possess the warrant, the officer must inform the defendant of the warrant’s existence and of the offense charged and, at the defendant’s request, must show the original or a duplicate original warrant to the defendant as soon as possible.

(B) A summons is served on an individual defendant:

(i) by delivering a copy to the defendant personally; or

(ii) by leaving a copy at the defendant’s residence or usual place of abode with a person of suitable age and discretion residing at that location and by mailing a copy to the defendant’s last known address.

(C) A summons is served on an organization in a judicial district of the United States by delivering a copy to an officer, to a managing or general agent, or to another agent appointed or legally authorized to receive service of process. If the agent is one authorized by statute and the statute so requires, a copy must also be mailed to the organization.

(D) A summons is served on an organization not within a judicial district of the United States:

(i) by delivering a copy, in a manner authorized by the foreign jurisdiction’s law, to an officer, to a managing or general agent, or to an agent appointed or legally authorized to receive service of process; or

(ii) by any other means that gives notice, including one that is:

(a) stipulated by the parties;

(b) undertaken by a foreign authority in response to a letter rogatory, a letter of request, or a request submitted under an applicable international agreement; or

(c) permitted by an applicable international agreement.

(4) Return

(A) After executing a warrant, the officer must return it to the judge before whom the defendant is brought in accordance with Rule 5. The officer may do so by reliable electronic means. At the request of an attorney for the government, an unexecuted warrant must be brought back to and canceled by a magistrate judge or, if none is reasonably available, by a state or local judicial officer.

(B) The person to whom a summons was delivered for service must return it on or before the return day.

(C) At the request of an attorney for the government, a judge may deliver an unexecuted warrant, an unserved summons, or a copy of the warrant or summons to the marshal or other authorized person for execution or service.

(d) Warrant by Telephone or Other Reliable Electronic Means. In accordance with Rule 4.1, a magistrate judge may issue a warrant or summons based on information communicated by telephone or other reliable electronic means.

INSIDER TRADING

OVERT ACT

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/bill-prevent-lawmakers-their-spouses-stock-trading-standstill-pelosi-faces-backlash

COMING SOON VIA IN THE NAME OF ONE OR MORE “THE PEOPLE OF THE 50 STATES – COMMON LAW COURTS ETC.” ENTITLED “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERALAND/OR RELATOR” VS. JOE R. BIDEN IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS U.S. PRESIDENT

arrest-warrantDownload

ALL EXECUTIVE ORDER OF BIDEN IS NULL AND VOID WITHOUT ANY LEGAL EFFECT!!

BIDEN

PURSUANT TO “THE LAW, ” 18 U.S. Code § 2383 – Rebellion or insurrection,

Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

BIDEN, HARRIS, TRUMP, U.S. SENATORS ET AL ARE GUILTY FOR THE ACTS OR OMISSIONS, ONE OR MORE GUILTY OF “CONSPIRACY, COMPLICITY, AIDING AND ABETTING TRUMP,” TO DEFRAUD BOTH SHARON AND JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER(FORMER REAL ESTATE BROKER AND/OR BUSINESS OWNER(S) REBELLION OR INSURRECTION FOR FAILING TO PROSECUTE TRUMP AND ARE INCAPABLE OF HOLD “ANY OFFICE UNDER THE UNITED STATES!!”

PURSUANT TO MY DUTY AS A U.S. CITIZEN AND PURSUANT TO THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE(TO FORM A NEW GOVERNMENT PURSANT TO THE DECLARATION OF INDENDENCE VIA BIDEN, HARRIS, TRUMP, U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES TREASON, CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT GENOCIDE ON U.S. CITIZENS ETC.

YES I WILL WATCH SHARON BRIDGEWATER(“THE UNITED 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR”)MARCH TO WASHINGTON D.C.AND ARREST THE PERPETRATORS FOR CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD THE U.S.A. IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 371 AND/OR JOIN

Romans 1:23

“And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.”

King James Version (KJV)

Share this:

• Twitter
• Facebook

_________________________