![NATIONAL EMERGENCY!! NOT FAKE NEWS! CHRISTIAN PERSECUTION IN AMERICA HAS BEGUN!! THE IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCMENT(ICE) AGENCY ARE ACTING IN JOINT PARTICIPATION WITH DONALD TRUMP, BONDI, the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) TO MAKE INDISCRIMINATORY ARREST, FORCE CHRISTIANS INTO FEMA EXTERMINATION DEATH CAMPS FOR "BEHEADINGS," FOR ALL WHO DO NOT WORSHIP SATAN AND RECEIVE BILL GATES(MICROSOFT'S) "OFFICIAL MARK OF THE BEAST – PERMANENT EMBEDDED TATTOO IN THE SKIN-REPLACEMENT OF OUR CELL PHONES," TAKING PLACE UNDER THE GUISE OF DONALD TRUMP "IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT." ICE IS "DISSOLVED VIA COURT ORDER OF THIS LAWFUL ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME COURT!" ALL ICE AGENT AJUDICATED GUILTY FOR GENOCIDE, CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY ETC. & PROPERTY HAS BEEN FORFEITED AND DEATH WARRANTS ISSUED FOR THEIR CONSPIRACY WITH ISIS "LITERALLY!!" DOMESTIC TERRORIST OPERATING IN JOINT PARTICIPATION WITH ALIEN FOREIGN ENEMY TERRORIST ON U.S. SOIL!! THE U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT(ICE), DONALD TRUMP, JAMES D. VANCE AND OTHER PUBLIC OFFICIALS CONCEAL KNOWN FACTS THEY ARE UNDER A DUTY TO DISCLOSE TO U.S. CITIZENS AND IS ACTING IN JOINT PARTICIPATION WITH the "Satanic" Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) AND OTHER "MIDDLE EASTERN" TERRORIST TO USE FORCE, COERCION ENSLAVE U.S. CITIZENS(AND/OR HUMANITY) WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW, FORCE WORSHIP OF SATAN AND BEHEAD ALL CHRISTIANS(AND OTHER RELIGIONOUS GROUP INCLUDING ISLAM, BUDDIST, HINDUS ETC.)[SEE THE HOLY BIBILE Revelation 20:4 KVJ], FOR ALL WHO DO NOT RECEIVE BILL GATES PERMANENT NON-REMOVAL TATTOO IMBEDDED UNDER THE SKIN- REPLACEMENT OF OUR CELL PHONES- THE OFFICIAL MARK OF THE BEAST(REVELATION 13:11-18) AT THE LAST TRUMP(1 Corinthians 15:52-THE HOLY BIBLE)!! AMERICA "AS WE KNOW IT" ENDS ON ITS 250 BIRTHDAY(THIS YEAR) "LITERALLY!!"](https://thefinalexodus.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/angel_blowing_trumpet_by_winnerone_d6av191-375w-2x.jpg)
IN THE NAME OF YESHUA/JESUS CHRIST OF NAZARETH!! I REBUKE ALL SATANIC PUBLIC OFFICIALS ET AL FROM ILLEGALLY, UNLAWFULLY COMMITTING CRIMINAL ACTS AGAINST MY BUSINESS, PERSON OR PROPERTY AND MAKING FALSE, DECEPTIVE STATEMENTS TO THE AMERICAN PUBLIC & DEFRAUDING THE U.S.A. IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 371 !! THIS IS A PUBLIC NOTICE(OF “RETROACTIVE-FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT” APPEARANCE AS PRESIDENT OF THE 50 UNITED STATES AND OTHER OFFICES, RETROACTIVE AMENDMENT TO THE U.S. CONSTITUTION – SEE BELOW “COMMON LAW” INTERVENTION) ADJUDICATION DECLARATORY JUDGMENT, TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER/PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND/OR INJUNCTION WRIT(VIA ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME COMMON LAW) 2022 CONGRESSIONAL ELECTIONS & 2024 U.S. PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS- ARREST WARRANTS, JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE- (SEE BELOW)AND ADJUDICATION DECLARATORY JUDGMENT/INJUNCTION ENTITLED THE 50 STATES SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR VS. “ALL 2024 REPUBLICANS PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES INCLUDING DONALD TRUMP ET AL “AND “ALL DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATES INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO JOE BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS ET AL ,”(AND DECLARING ONE OR MORE THE LISBON TREATY, CHINA MASSIVE BELT AND ROAD INITIATIVE – DEBT TRAP – FOR ANY BORROWING AFRICAN/SOUTH AMERICAN GOVERNMENT(S)/COUNTRIES GOVERNMENT AND/OR CONTRACTS WITH CHINA ARE NULL AND VOID AND WITHOUT ANY LEGAL EFFECT-SEE BELOW) CONSTITUTE “RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY” AND A SCHEME TO DEFRAUD U.S. CITIZENS AND THE U.S.A. IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 371(SEE BELOW BIDEN GRANT CHINA U.S. SOVEREIGNTY-ILLEGAL, UNLAWFUL – MERRICK GARLAND, JOE BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS ET AL AND “FAKE” HUNTER BIDEN E-MAIL LAPTOP – FAKE SPECIAL PROSECUTORS – EXPLOITATION OF BOTH SHARON & JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER, ILLEGAL USPRUPATION ON ONE OR MORE BUSINESSES OF THE TWO WITNESSES TO OBTAIN BENEFIT IN THE AMOUNT OF 125 TRILLION DOLLARS VIA EXPLOITATION & CONSPIRACY TO USPURP ONE OR MORE SHARON AND JAMES BRIDGEWATER BUSINESSES – SEE BELOW-INTERVENTION)
THIS IS A (“RETROACTIVE – FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT””- SEE BELOW INTERVENTION – FOR MEANING) CRIMINAL PROSECUTION AND LAWFUL PUBLIC COURT HEARING BROUGHT BY THE “50 STATES” EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR(FROM [ON BEHALF OF MYSELF, MY SON, ON BEHALF OF THE PEOPLE OF THE 50 STATES,& HUMANITY – MEN AND WOMEN CREATED IN THE IMAGE OF GOD – WITH ONE OR MORE FREE WILL, U.S. CONSTITUTIONAL AND/OR HUMAN RIGHTS ETC. ] – WITH LAWFUL/LEGAL AUTHORITY AND STANDING TO PROSECUTE ETC. – VIA THE RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATION ACT(RICO) AND ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME LAW- VIA COMMON LAW REMEDIES – VIA BREACH OF “INTERNATIONAL/TRANSNATIONAL PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP MARITIME” CONTRACT ENTERED INTO WITH THE TWO WITNESSES(SHARON AND JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER, BREACH OF MAJOR INTERNATIONAL TREATIES, BREACH OF INTERNATIONAL PEACE, RESTRAINT IN INTERSTATE FOREIGN COMMERCE AND VIOLATIONS NUMEROUS DOMESTIC AND INTERNATIONAL LAWS, AND
ENTITLED THE “50 STATES” EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR VS. MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS “DEFACTO” OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS CHIEF JUDGE FOR U.S. COURT OF APPEALS D.C.CIRCUIT & U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
[RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY FRAUD, MERRICK GARLAND in one or more “defacto” official capacity as D.C. for his knowing, intentional adoption(continued racketeering conspiracy from Jan. 1, 1993 and continuing thru to July 2019) of one or more Major Corporations(Officers, Presidents, Chief Executive Officer etc.), Jacob Rothchild, Obama, Biden, Holder, Kamala Harris, all U.S. Supreme court Judges VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. § 1506 – fraud on the court, crimes committed against both Sharon and James Bridgewater[business, person or property] Money Laundering to one or more U.S. Federal Reserve, “Global Central Banks,”in violation of 18 U.S. Code § 1956
, 18 U.S. Code § 1513, 18 U.S. Code § 241, 18 U.S. Code § 242, 18 U.S. Code § 1951 – Interference with commerce by threats or violence,(SEE BELOW-INTERVENTION) fifty or more violations of or more 18 U.S. Code § 1961 scheme to defraud by means of false pretenses, (2) defendant’s knowing and willful participation in scheme with intent to defraud, and (3) use of interstate wire communications in furtherance of scheme, )18 U.S. Code § 1031, false statements in violation of 18 U.S. Code § 1001, knowingly, intentionally and willfully falsified and continue to falsify, concealed and continues to conceal, covered up and continues to cover-up by trick, scheme and/or devise or material fact and/or made and continues to make material false, fictitious and fraudulent statements and/or representation (in false swearing “each other into one or more Offices of the U.S. President, Vice President, Attorney General, U.S. Supreme Court Justices, etc. in oath of office – within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative or judicial branch of the United States, from Jan. 1, 1993 and continuing thru to 2008 and continuing thru to present) that he and others Kamala Harris, Joe
Biden, Trump et al knowing, intentional engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity and continue to engage in a pattern of racketeering, activity, injured and damaged and continue to injure and damage “The 50 States ex rel Sharon Bridgewater private attorney General and/or Relator illegally, unlawful falsely assumes or pretends to be an officer or employee acting under the authority of the United States or any Department of Justice(and/or department(s) and agencies), in violation of 18 U.S. Code § 912, usurps the office of the United States Attorney General, the Officer of the President, the Office of the Vice President, the Offices of the U.S. Supreme Court Justices, the Officer of the U.S. Representatives etc. by force,
in furtherance of the conspiracy to promote the objective of the criminal enterprise defraud the two witnesses out of money and/or property, enslave the two Witnesses[U.S. Citizens and Humanity] and Grant China U.S. National sovereignty!!
due process of law” ONE OR MORE WIRE FRAUD, ILLEGAL USE OF MY NAME WITHOUT THE RIGHT AND MULTIPLE OTHER CRIMINAL ACTS COMMITTED AGAINST MY BUSINESS, PERSON OR PROPERTY ACTING IN JOINT PARTCIPATION WITH ONE MORE JOE BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS, DONALD TRUMP ET AL FOR ACTS OF REBELLION AND INSURRECTION, 18 U.S. Code § 2382 – Misprision of treason 18 U.S. Code § 2383 – Rebellion or insurrection, TREASON, GRANTING CHINA U.S. NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY(ENSLAVING AND/OR ATTEMPTING TO ENSLAVE U.S. CITIZENS TO COMMUNIST CHINA “LITERALLY” SEE BELOW) AND MULTIPLE INTERNATIONAL CRIMES, ACTS OF TERRORISM ETC. AGAINST THE TWO WITNESSES BOTH SHARON- CLICK HERE FOR SHARON BACKGROUND- AND JAMES- BRIDGEWATER TWO FORMER REAL ESTATE BUSINESS OWNERS ENGAGED IN INTERSTATE AND FOREIGN COMMERCE, INJURED AND DAMAGED IN BUSINESS, PERSON OR PROPERTY AND RESTRAINED FROM CONDUCTING BUSINESS(INTERSTATE AND FOREIGN COMMERCE FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT
MERRICK GARLAND U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL RACKETEERING “INTERNATIONAL CRIMINALS” STANDING BEFORE JUDGE “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERL AND/OR RELATOR DURING ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME TRIAL!!
NOTE: The United States of America Declaration of Independence, in pertinent part states: “But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security of America.”(THE RIGHT TO FORM A NEW GOVERNMENT).COMES “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR RETROACTIVELY[FROM JAN 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT], PURSUANT TO MY DUTY AS A U.S. CITIZEN & A VICTIM AND WITNESSES OF ILLEGAL, UNLAWFUL USURPATION OF “PUBLIC OFFICE(S)” & ILLEGAL, UNLAWFUL USURPATION ONE OR MORE OF OUR(JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER AND/OR SHARON BRIDGEWATER) BUSINESS(ES) & RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY JOE BIDEN, KAMALA
GOD JUDGE AMERICA(PUBLIC OFFICIALS) BY MAKING AN X WITH HIS FINGER – SEE BELOW)
FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU PRESENT AND OTHER CO HARRISPUBLIC OF THE “50 STATES” EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR” VIA THE ONLY TWO WITNESSES(DIRECTLY INJURED BY JOE BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS, DONALD TRUMP AND PREDESSCORS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT] IN THE WORLD WITH THE STANDING TO BRING TO PROSECUTE, ARREST, JAIL, SENTENCE AND BRING TO JUSTICE ALL “COV-19 PERPETRATORS, CO-CONSPIRATORS AND RACKETEERING VIOLATORS” FOR THE NANOTECH INJECTION, FRAUD AND GLOBAL PLANDEMIC RETROACTIVELY FORM A NEW U.S. GOVERNMENT(SEE BELOW-AJUDICATION & DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AND INJUNCTION – ELECTIONS FRAUD AND OTHER CRIMES AGAINST THE TWO WITNESSES AND AMERICA PEOPLE !! THAT ALL AS FOLLOWS:
PUBLIC NOTICE, ADJUDICATION DECLARATORY JUDGMENT, TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER/PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND/OR INJUNCTION WRIT VIA ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME COMMON LAW;
ENTITLED “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR(DIRECTLY INJURED BY BIDEN[HARRIS] PRESIDENTS FROM JAN. 1, 1993[AND THOSE OPERATING UNDER THEIR DIRECTION AND CONSPIRACY WITH ONE OR MORE JACOB ROTHCHILD, FOREIGN OFFICIALS AND MAJOR CORPORATIONS OFFICERS, DIRECTOR ETC.] VIA RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY “LITERALLY” – WITH LEGAL, LAWFUL AUTHORITY & STANDING “LITERALLY” TO ARREST, PROSECUTE AND BRING TO JUSTICE) VS. MERRICK GARLAND, JOE BIDEN, HARRIS, DONALD TRUMP, NIKI HALEY ET AL “TREASONOUS” GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS BIDEN, HARRIS AND OTHER PUBLIC OFFICIALS GRANTING CHINA U.S. NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY(ACTING IN JOINT PARTICIPATION WITH CHINA’S PRESIDENT XI JINPING IN A “CHINA-COMMUNIST” “LITERALLY” TO SEIZE AND TAKE CONTROL OF AMERICA AND VIOLATIONS OF THE NUREMBERG CODE VIA THE “COV-19 NANOTECH-MILITARY GRADE DEFENSE ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECT AGENCY(DARPHA)BIOLOGICAL WARFARE DNA-MIND ALTERING INJECTION” ON THE TWO WITNESSES(AND HUMANITY) & GLOBAL PLANDEMIC FRAUD ON THE TWO WITNESSES AND HUMANTIY!!
RECRUITING OTHER WITNESSES TO WITNESS THE “50 STATES” EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR ARREST, PROSECUTE AND BRING TO JUSTICE(AND/OR RECRUITING OTHER ASSISTANTS
TO ASSIST IN PROSECUTION, ARREST FOR THEIR KNOWINGLY, INTENTIONALLY, CONCEALMENT, DECEPTION, FRAUD, FORCE, COERCION VIA THE COV-19 “NANO-TECH INJECTION”[DAMAGE WHICH CAN NOT BE UNDONE] – THE ONLY TWO WITNESSES IN THE WORLD WITH STANDING AND AUTHORITY TO BRING TO JUSTICE[WHEN ALL OTHER PROSECUTIONS HAVE FAILED FOR EXAMPLE THE FOLLOWING DR. ROBERT FUELLMICH, AND COUNTLESS OTHERS HAVE STARTED “INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL PROCEEDING AGAINST THE “INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE” BUT LACK THE AUTHORITY TO SENTENCE, PROSECUTE AND/OR JAIL THE PERPATRATORS, BUT ARE UNABLE TO “LAWFULLY-PROSECUTE AND SENTENCE BECAUSE THEY HAVE NOT BEEN DIRECTLY INJURED AND DAMAGED BY THE PERPETRATORS AND LACK STANDING) WHEREAS, THE TWO WITNESS DIRECTLY DAMAGED BY BIDEN, HARRIS, MERRICK GARLAND ETC. HAVE THE AUTHORITY VIA “THE 50 NSTATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATOTRNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR DR. ROBERT FUELLMICH, AND COUNTLESS OTHERS HAVE STARTED CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE “INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL RACKET” BUT ARE UNABLE TO JUDGE AND/OR SENTENCE(AND/OR “JAIL”) THE PERPATRATORS BECAUSE THEY LACK STANDING –AS FOLLOWS
(HUNDREDS AND/OR THOUSANDS OF LAWYERS AND/OR DOCTORS HAVE STARTED CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE PERPETRATORS FOR “BILLIONS” OF VIOLATIONS OF THE NUREMBERG CODE FOR EXPERIMENTAL COVID INJECTION “DEATH” JAB THAT: 1)CHANGE MEN AND WOMEN DNA AND/OR GENES, 2)PATENT MEN AND WOMEN FOR ENSLAVMENT AND “GLOBAL ELITE” OWNERSHIP, 3) THAT CONCEALED KNOWN FACTS FROM HUMANITY” AND THE TWO WITNESSES THEY WERE UNDER A DUTY TO DISCLOSE PUT DEFENSE ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECT AGENCY(DARPHA) BIOWEAPON HYDROGELS NANO TECHNOLOGIES AND/OR IMPLANTABLE NANOTECHNOLOGY IN “THE TWO WITNESSES AND/OR HUMANITY” VIA THE “RAZORBLADE COVID-19 INJECTION DEATH JAB(SEE THIS WEBSITE)” WITH FRAUD, FORCE AND/OR COERCION WITHOUT THE CONSENT AND WHICH HAVE KILLED MILLIONS(AND WILL KILL BILLIONS IN THE FUTURE)INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO BABY FORMULAS ,BUT HAVE BEEN UNSUCCESSFUL TO IM https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuremberg_CodeAND ATTEMPTED TO FOR INSTANCE DR. ROBERT FUELLMICH, AND COUNTLESS OTHERS HAVE STARTED CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE “INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL RACKET” BUT ARE UNABLE TO JUDGE AND/OR SENTENCE(AND/OR “JAIL”) THE PERPATRATORS BECAUSE THEY LACK STANDING – SEE BELOW FOR DEFINTION OF STANDING )VIA THE RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATION ACT AND ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME LAW COMMON LAW (SEE BELOW)
& VIOLATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS, U.S. CONSTITUTIOAL RIGHTS AND “BRAIN RIGHTS”(SEE BELOW)”
AND OTHERHEINOUS DOMESTIC AND/OR INTERNATIONAL CRIMES – TRIED AND CONVICTED IN A “LAWFUL-LEGAL COURT OF LAW”(SEE BELOW) VIA TRIAL(SEE BELOW)ARREST WARRANTS, JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION AND SENTENCE AS FOLLOWS:
On Biden’s first day as U.S. President[On or about Jan. 20, 2021) without legal authority Grants China Xi Jinping U.S. National Sovereignty(AND VIOLATE “ALL” my U.S. CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND U.S. CITIZENS CONSTITUTIONAL AND/OR HUMAN RIGHTS)
THE ABOVE ARE AMENDMENTS
AND SCHEME TO USE MILITARY TO MAINTAIN ORDER
- BIDEN GRANTS CHINA AND THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION PRESIDENT(A MARXIST TERRORIST “LITERALLY”)U.S.A. NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY(HANDS THE U.S.A. OVER TO CHINA(“fraudulent PLANDEMIC”) SEE BELOW!
- BIDEN & HARRIS ET AL (aka U.S.PUBLIC OFFICIALS)FRAUDULENTY CONCEAL KNOWN INFORMATION FROM U.S. CITIZENT THAT THEY ARE ACTING IN JOIN PARTICIPATION WITH CHINA TO COLLECT OUR DNA https://www.thefinalexodus.com/china-collects-dna
- KNOWINGLY, INTENTIONALLY CONCEALED KNOWN FACTS THEY WERE UNDER A DUTY TO DISCLOSE TO “THE TWO WITNESSES” AND HUMANITY, USED FRAUD, COERCION AND/OR “MANDATES” INJECTED ONE OR MORE OF THE TWO WITNESSES AND/OR HUMANITY WITH MILITARY GRADE “NANOTECHNOLOGY” AND INTENTIONALLY MISREPESENTED THAT IT WAS COVID!!
- China’s Surveillance State: An Open-Air Prison – (Biden grants China “open air prison” of U.S. Citizens here in America)
- BIDEN SIGNS EXECUTIVE ORDER #14067(DIGITIAL DOLLAR TO PARALLEL WITH CHINA’S CASHLESS SOCIETY IN A SCHEME TO DEFRAUD THE TWO WITENSSES AND HUMANITY OUT OF ALL MONEY AND PROPERTY WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW)
- BIDEN SIGNS EXECUTIVE ORDER TO CHAN https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2022/09/12/executive-order-on-advancing-biotechnology-and-biomanufacturing-innovation-for-a-sustainable-safe-and-secure-american-bioeconomy/ ALL FORMS OF FOOD, WATER, The COVID-19 pandemic has demonstrated the vital role of biotechnology and biomanufacturing in developing and producing life-saving diagnostics, therapeutics, and vaccines that protect Americans and the world. Although the power of these technologies is most vivid at the moment in the context of human health, biotechnology and biomanufacturing can also be used to achieve our climate and energy goals, improve food security and sustainability, secure our supply chains, and grow the economy across all of America – CHANGE YOUR GENES(GENE EDITING) OF EVERY U.S. CITIZEN(AND/OR HUMANITY) THRU FOOD, THE WATER, ETC. “BIO – TO AI
- DARPHA COV-19 INJECTION TO CONR
- ONE OR MORE BIDEN, OBAMA AND TRUMP(PRESIDENTS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 THRU TO PRESENT TRAIN CHINESE TROOPS ON U.S. SOIL( LLOYD AUSTIN – AND PREDECESSORS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO HIS TERMAND CO-CONSPIRATOR MAJOR CORPORATION(PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP) – CONSPIRES WITH CHINESE GOVERNMENT AND/OR MILITARY USE THREAT, FORCE AND COERCION FORCE EVERY TROOP TO RECEIVE https://www.defense.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/3114220/three-new-projects-for-dods-innovate-beyond-5g-program/
- BIDEN Sale of U.S. Oil Reserves to China
- China owns and controls almost 192,000 acres of farmland in the United States China owns
- BIDEN SIGNS EXECUTIVE ORDER TO DIGITIZE THE U.S. DOLLAR(TO DEFRAUD EVERY U.S. CITIZEN OUT OF THEIR MONEY IN BANKING ACCOUNTS, DEFRAUD U.S. CITIZENS OUT OF ALL REAL ESTATE PROPERT, FORCE U.S. CITIZENS TO EAT, BUY ETC. WHAT THE GOVERMENT MANDATES,FORCE U.S. CITIZENS INTO SLAVERY, TOTAL SURVIELLANCE, CONSOLIDATE WITH CHINA’S CASHLESS SOCIETY SURVIELLENCE SYSTEM AND CHINA’S SOCIAL CREDIT SYSTEM(COMING SOON TO AMERICA) TO CONTROL AND ENSLAVE
- BIDEN AND/OR TRUMP GIVE CHINA ACCESS TO POWER GRID
- China is buying up all U.S. land and our 50 States legislator have don “nothing” but talk, China’s presence in the American food system poses a national security risk
- ON OR MORE BIDEN(AND PREDESSORS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO HIS TERM SALE THE STATE OF HAWAII AND CALIFORNIA TO CHINA
- China’s Latest Land Purchase Could Pose Major U.S. Security Risk
- TRUMP
- CHINA DRAINING U.S. RESOURCES, DEPLETING U.S. WATER https://news.wttw.com/2018/03/19/foxconn-seeks-7m-gallons-lake-michigan-water-daily
- CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR NEWSOME EITHER ATTEMPTED TO AND/OR SPEND ONE BILLION DOLLARS ON “MASK” VIA A FAKE PANAMIC
- Chinese investors and firms own majority of 2,400 US companies and some are!
BIDEN OWING A ALLEGIANCE TO THE U.S.A KNOWINGLY, INTENTIONALLY, levies war against THE U.S. A., THE CITIZENS OF THE U.S.A., AND/OR THE TWO WITNESSES(SHARON AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER)ADHERES TO THE ENEMY(CHINA A COMMUNIST COUNTRY KNOWN FOR “MASS” HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS)BY GIVING AID, COMFORT WITHIN THE U.S.A. IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S. Code § 2381 BIDEN COMMITTED OVERT ACTS AND LOST HIS REPRESENTATIVE CAPACITY AS PRESIDENT ON HIS FIRST DAY OF OFFICE!! ALL OF BIDEN’S EXECUTIVE ORDER(APPOINTMENTS, NOMINATIONS, ETC.) ARE NULL AND VOID AND WITHOUT ANY LEGAL EFFECT!! THEREFORE, ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT NOMINATION, APPOINTMENTS, CONFIRMATIONS ETC. BY BIDEN MADE AFTER HIS FIRST DAY IN OFFICE ARE NULL AND VOID AND WITHOUT ANY LEGAL EFFECT!! BIDEN ILLEGALLY, UNLAWFULLY, USURPS THE “OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES PRESIDENT BY FORCE, IS INCAPABLE OF HOLDING OFFICE ” is guilty of Treason. Anyone guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than ,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States. (see below adjudication & declaratory judgment conviction and sentence of Biden)
ALL KNOW THEY ARE SUBJECT TO THE DEATH PENALTY FOR THEIR HENIOUS ACTS OR OMISSIONS AGAINST THE TWO WITNESSES, U.S. CITIZENS AND HUMANITY AND KNOWINGLY ATTEMPTS DAMAGE CONTROL AS FOLLOWS:
https://www.npr.org/2022/03/07/1084999251/pentagon-supreme-court-vaccine-mandate-navy-seals
-CLICK HERE-FOR OTHER ACTS VIA DAMAGE CONTROL ETC.
JAN. 6, 2023 – TWO YEAR ANNIVERSARY OF THE CAPITOL ATTACKS –
ALL KNOWING THEY ARE SUBJECT TO THE DEATH PENALTY FOR THEIR PART IN CRIMES AGAINST THE TWO WITNESSES(AND HUMANTY), WAR CRIMES , VIOLATIONS OF THE NUREMBERG CODEIN FURTHERANCE OF THE CONSPIRACY ONE OR MORE PUBLIC OFFICIALS INCLUDINGING BUT NOT LIMTED TO NIKI HALEY, Ron DeSantis(SEE BELOW AMERICA JUDGED) ACCEPTS BRIBES IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. 201 IN EXCHANGE TO RUN FOR PRESIDENT OF U.S.A. -CLICK HERE FOR THE “50 STATES” EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR CERTIFIED MAIL TO NIKI HALEY(A FORMER U.S. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE by Donald Trump as Ambassador to the United Nations from January 2017 through December 2018 – “OPERATING UNDER DONALD TRUMP’S DIRECTION”) ON FEBRUARY 17, 2023, THREE DAYS AFTER SHE ANNOUNCED SHE IS RUNNING AGAINST HER CRIMINAL “RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY CO-CONSPIRATOR PARTNER” DONALD TRUM TRUMP!
CONTINUED ACCEPTANCE OF DONATIONS FROM U.S. CITIZENS AT https://nikkihaley.com/ OR ANY WEBSITE WHICH COLLECT DONATION FOR PRESIDENTIAL candidate FOR 2024 ELECTION CONSTITUTE A CONTINUING CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD THE U.S.A. IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C SECTION 371 AND RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY!!
ALL DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS “CO-CONSPIRATORS,” FOREIGN OFFICIALS “HEADS OF STATE”/MAJOR CORPORATIONS AND THEIR CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS ETC. unlawfully employed by or associated with “COV-19 BIOWEAPONS PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP TERRORIST GROUP” ENTERPRISE from Jan. 1, 1993 and continuing thru to present engaged in or continues to engage in, conducted and continues to conduct or participated and continues to participate, directly or indirectly, in the conduct of the above enterprise’s affairs through a pattern of racketeering activity or collection of unlawful debt and which activities affected and continues to affect, interstate or foreign commerce in violation 18 U.S.C.A. § 1962(c)
“ALL HAVE BEEN TRIED AND FOUND GUITY & SENTENCE IN A LAWFUL COURT OF LAW!!
(PER LAW – ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME LAW THERE IS NO A JURY TRIAL!!) Affidavit & sworn statement of Sharon Bridgewater (and/or James S. Bridgewater – two witnesses and victim) injured & damages “DIRECTLY” BY U.S. PRESIDENTS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 and continuing thru to present “literally!!!”
Jacob Rothchild (Owner and Controller of the U.S. Federal Reserve, all global “central banks” [aka “GOD OF MAMMON AND/OR THE GOD OF THIS WORLD]publicly admits he a Satanist, Luciferian, Atheist and Official Representative of Satan and Representative of the 13 Satanic Bloodline[mimicked after the GOD IN HEAVEN – TWELVE TRIBES OF ISRAEL]claims he created “the Apple of God’s in Heaven Eye Israel and/or Owns Israel(LAND OF JEWS, CHRISTIANS, MUSLIM ETC.)via the Balfour Declaration, and Zionist Rothchild(also claims he is a direct descendant of King David God’s chosen King of Israel) one knowingly, intentionally, deliberately used vague language, and chosen Israel to make Palestine a Jewish it’s “national home.” Currently conspires with CHINA’S XI JINPING(The Chinese Communist Party is an Official Atheist Country known for extreme persecution of one or more Christians, Muslims, Buddist and all religions “except” Satanism. Note: Anyone who wishes to practice religion in China must first pledge allegiance to “Satan/The Dragon-Xi Jinping”)and Co-conspirators “Global Elites, to make a One World Satanic Global Order(and include the United States of America).
On or about Jan. 1, 1993 and continuing thru to present Jacob Rothchild “THE GOD OF THE AIR” and Xi Jinping et al infiltrated the United States Government(U.S. Presidents from Jan. 1, 1993 and continuing thru to present and those operating under their direction )entered into Abraham Accords agreement Israel and the United Arab Emirates[any many other arabic countries](Brokered by Donald Trump),
[see the prophecy of Daniel]
knowingly develops, produces, stockpiles, transfers, acquires, retains, or possesses any biological agent, toxin, or delivery system for use as a weapon, or knowingly assists a foreign state or any organization to war against the two witnesses and men and weomen created in the impdo so VIA installed Global Surveillance and Monitoring System,
“Satan’s representused trick, scheme to do away with the Fiat Money(money that’s worthless) One world Currency with no monetary system that 5g cell phone towers, frabucated a “Global pandemic for the sole purpose to get the two wintesses and the population to inject the “Defense Military Grade Bioweapon” to use, train the U.S. Military(and/or other militaries)to use force on it’s citizens, ofr all thto control the two witnesses(and/or Humanity Braino coerce the two witnesses. iNTERNET OF BODIES, ARTIFIC
discriminated against both Sharon & James S. Bridgewater humanity, knowingly develops, produces, stockpiles, transfers, acquires, retains, or possesses any biological agent, toxin, or delivery system for use as a weapon, or knowingly assists a foreign state or any organization to do so in change the two DNA, to make his own race(just at and continues to infil inflitrate FROM jAN. 1, 1993 and continuing thru to present(U.S. Presidents and those operating under their direction from Jan. 1, 1993 and continuing thur preinfl https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/infiltrate U.S. Presidents from Jan. 1, 1993 and continuing thru to present knowingly, intentionally, upurtion of one or more of Corporations, founded, “literally” “literally” illegal, Treason, Retroactively appear and Pursuant to my duty, U.S. Presidents from Jan. 1, 1993 and continuing thru to present upursation of one or more of Corporations Health Necessities and Accessories Inc. , in an attempt to aid, abet assist China in the U.S.A. take-over, founded, “literally” “literally” illegal, Treason, Prince of the Power of Air the 5G Cell Towers to control, “false, fake Pandemic” Bioweapons COV-19 INJECTON to control brain functions and to enslave, along with defrauded all of humanity out of money and/or property(again-see made laws having Gold was illegal and everyone had to give their Gold to the U.S. Government) buy or sell, illegal immigration(declare a Global public health emergency)
Most citizens to rely on theU.S. Government for food, etc.[and/or Rothchild fraud and fiat dollars]
for a “stock market crash”
similar to the great depression of the 30’s[to force
RETROACTIVELY FORM A NEW GOVERNMENT, RETROAAMEND THE U.S. CONSTITUTION, SEE BELOW – SWORN STATEMENT & AFFIDIVANT
WOMEN OF APOCALYPSE
COMES NOW THE “50 STATES” EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR(SEE BELOW FOR DEFINITION)PURSUANT TO MY DUTY AS A UNITED STATES CITIZEN, AND AS A VICTIM OF ROTHCHILD, XI JINPING, ET AL ILLEGAL, UNLAWFUL UPSUPATION OF AND FEDERAL WITNESS, INJURED AND DAMAGED BY U.S. PRESIDENTS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT(IN BUSINESS, PERSON OR PROPERTY)ON BEHALF OF MYSELF, MY SON AND/OR HUMANITY ONE OR MORE COMPANIES ILLEGALLY, UNLAWFULLY, UPSURPED BY JACOB ROTHCHILD, XI JINPING AND OTHER CO-CONSPIRATOR TO OBTAIN 125 TRILLION DOLLARS TO FUND THEIR “GLOBAL GENOCIDE PROJECT – THE NANO-TECH. COVID INJECTION ON HUMANTIYAND HUMANTIY & PURSUANT TO MY RIGHT, RETROACTIVELY(FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT) FORM A NEW GOVERNMENT, AMEND THE U.S. CONSTITUTION, ADD A 28TH AMENDMENT TO THE U.S. CONSTITUTION TO INCLUDE to protect brain rights or “neurorights” TO ENJOIN AND RESTRAIN “TREASONOUS” JOE BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS(AND OTHER CO-CONSPIRATORS ET AL) FROM GRANTING CHINA U.S. NATIONAL SOVERI
SEE BELOW – SWORN STATEMENT & AFFIDIVANT COMES NOW “TWO WITNESSES AND APPEAR BEFORE “THE GOD OF THE EARTH (JACOB ROTHCHILD”GOD OF THE EARTH”/XI JINPINGAPPEAR “REPRESENTATIVE OF THE “LOST TRIBES OF ISRAEL AND/OR 12 tribes of israel APPEAR BEFORE THE “DRAGON” ALL ARE N
CLICK HERE – THE PRAYER OF A SEVEN YEAR OF GIRL TO GOD IN HEAVEN AND REVELATION FROM GOD!!
NOTICE AND ADJUDICATION IN THIS CRIMINAL PROCEEDING OF “RETROACTIVE”[JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT- SEE BELOW APPOINTMENT AFFIDIVANT – IN THE INTERVENTION]“LAWFUL/LEGAL” AMENDMENT TO THE TWELFTH U.S. CONSTITITION (CONCERNING ALL PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT – AND THE SEVENTEENTH AMENDMENT OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION, IN ADDITION TO THESE AMENDMENT TO THE U.S. CONSTITUTION “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR INCLUDES AN ADDITIONAL 28TH AMENDMENT, AS WELL AS AMEND THE DECLARATION FOR HUMAN RIGHTS TO INCLUDE “BRAIN RIGHTS” – NEURO RIGHTS(SEE BELOW INTERVENTION & ADJUDICATION, DECLARATORY JUDGMENT THAT ALL EXECUTIVE ORDERS, U.S. SUPREME COURT ORDER, ETC. FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU PRESENT ARE NULL AND VOID AND WITHOUT ANY LEGAL!!
PERMANENT INJUNCTION AGAINST ELECTIONS FRAUD(VIA U.S. REPRESENTATIVES 2022 AND U.S. PRESIDENTIAL 2024), PERMANENT INJUNCTION AGAINST U.S. ELECTIONS(U.S. REPRESENTATIVES 2022 AND U.S. PRESIDENTIAL 2024 – CRIMINALS CONSPIRING WITH CHINA – TO GRANT CHINA U.S.A. SOVEREIGNTY ) VIA THE “50 STATES” EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR
NOTICE AND ADJUDICATION IN THIS CRIMINAL PROCEEDING OF “RETROACTIVE”[JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT- FELONY CONVICTION FOR ONE OR MORE CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD THE U.S.A. IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 371– ALL ILLEGALLY, UNLAWFULLY USURPS ONE OR MORE “THE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT,” “THE OFFICE OF THE U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,” “THE OFFICE OF THE u.s. SUPREME COURT(S) ETC. WITHOUT THE RIGHT – SEE INTERVENTION]“
COMMON LAW – ALL WRITS CODIFIED AT 28 U.S.C. SECTION 1651 WHICH AUTHORIZES THIS “COMMON LAW COURT” TO ISSUE ALL WRITS NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE IN THE AID OF THIS COMMON LAW ADMIRALITY AND MARITIME COURT JURISDICTION AND AGREEABLE TO THE USAGE AND PRINCIPLE OF LAW IN “THIS COURT”
1) WRIT OF ENTRY,
2) ARREST WARRANTS IN REM
3) WRIT OF AUTHORITY OF
EXECUTION OF BIDEN(AND
PREDECESSORS FROM JAN. 1, 1993
AND CONTINUING THRU TO
PRESENT AND ALL CO-
CONSPIRATORS ) EXECUTION
WARRANT
AUTHORIZES( writ that authorizes the
execution of a condemned person).
ARMED AND DANGEROUS “CONVICTED” CRIMINALS “LITERALLY”!!
NOTICE & ADJUDIFICATION OF INJUNCTION WRIT ENTITLED “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR(WITH LEGAL/LAWFUL AUTHORITY AND STANDING TO OBTAIN RELIEF-SEE BELOW) VS. JOE BIDEN[AND PREDECESSOR FROM JAN. 1, 1993(RETROACTIVE) AND CONTINUING THRU TO HIS TERM) JAN. 6, 2023 – TWO YEAR ANNIVERSARY OF THE CAPITOL ATTACKS –
BIG BANKS/HEALTHCARE/BIG TECH/BIG PHARMA/PLANDEMIC BIOLOGICAL WARFARE TRANSNATIONAL ORGANIZED CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE” CONTINUING CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES WHICH INCLUDE ALL “HEADS OF STATE”(FOREIGN OFFICIALS & ESPECIALLY CHINA’S XI JINPING & MAJOR CORPORATIONS )” ACTING IN JOINT PARTICIPATION WITH U.S. PRESIDENTS[FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND THOSE OPERATING UNDER THEIR DIRECTION] On or about Jan. 1, 1993 and continuing thru to 2008-2009 and further continuing present that Merrick Garland in his official capacity as Chief U.S. Court of Appeals D.C. Circuit name in the U.S. Court of Appeals D.C.
In furtherance of the objective of the conspiracy Barak H. Obama in his official capacity as President, Joe Biden in his official capacity as Vice President, Eric Holder in his official capacity as U.S. Attorney General(see below Eastern District of Michigan Obama and Holder Court fraud – entitled “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORENY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR VS. BARAK H. OBAMA AND/OR ERIC HOLDER , Kamala Harris in her official capacity as District Attorney San Francisco, CA that she & Garland discriminated against the two witnesses committed wire fraud, violated both Sharon and James U.S. Constitutional rights in violation of 18 U.S. Code § 241 and 18 U.S. Code § 242, Retaliate against the (Sharon and James S. Bridgewater)two witnesses, victims and/or “informant(Whistleblowers)”
(NOW THE U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL) illegally, unlawfully used my name in the U.S. Court of Appeals D.C. Circuit and continues to use my name without the right and/or WITHOUT MY PERMISSION OR RIGHT TO OBTAIN BENEFIT(MONEY AND/OR PROPERTY WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW, WHAT LAWFULLY BELONGS TO THE “50 STATES” EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL(THE TWO WITNESSES)
HEALTHCARE FRAUD/OBAMACARE, develop, produce, stockpile or otherwise acquire or retain” biological materials used as weapons, to exterminate and/or destroy THE TWO WITNESSESES humanity, knowingly develops, produces, stockpiles, transfers, acquires, retains, or possesses any biological agent, toxin, or delivery system for use as a weapon, or knowingly assists a foreign state or any organization to do so,(enslave and/or imprison via Artificial Intentional A “GLOBAL PANDEMIC RESTRAIN INTERN(wire fraud – SEE BELOW CRIMI TERMINO),[SATAN IS A LIER, THE FATHER OF LIES, WAS A MURDER FROM THE BEGINNING, WAS A TRICKSTER FROM THE BEGINNING] knowing, intentionally, adopted the acts of one or more Jacob Rothschild,
That on or about March 11, 2021 IN TH EdISTRICT OF cOLU(date), in the County of (County),
the defendant, (defendant’s name), subscribed a written
instrument which contained a statement that was false;
Kamala Harris in her official capacity as District Attorney San Francisco, CA( ) KNOWINGLY, INTENTIONALLY that she & Garland discriminated against the two witnesses committed wire fraud, violated both Sharon and James U.S. Constitutional rights in violation of 18 U.S. Code § 241 and 18 U.S. Code § 242, Retaliate against the (Sharon and James S. Bridgewater)two witnesses, victims and/or “informant(Whistleblowers)”
Joe Biden, Donald Trump[and Predecessors et al & U.S. Presidents from Jan. 1, 1993 and continuing thru to present[and those operating under their direction](Ron DeSantis, Trump’s Real Estate “co-conspirators to defraud” et al “literally” & (1) That on or about (date), the defendant agreed with one or more persons [other than (fill in name of person whose agreement is excluded) ] to engage in or cause the performance of conduct constituting the crime of Geoncide, Nuremberg code, Human Rights (fill in underlying crime);crimes of agression, hostage taking, defraud both coercion forc sterli
“TRICKED” EVE AND CURRENTLY “TRICKS” ME VIA A FRAUDULANT PANDEMIC TO FORCE EVERYONE TO ]conspired and continue to conspire with Donald Trump[
Foreign Official-Heads of State” name in the U.S. Court of Appeals D.C. Circuit WITHOUT MY PERMISSION OR RIGHT(wire fraud), conspired made the agreement with one or more Donald Trump, Joe Biden, William Barr and Kamala Harris in their official capacities et al the intent that such conduct be performed;
(2) That the defendant made the agreement with oe or more Donald Trump, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris et al the intent that such conduct be performed;
(3) That any one of the persons Joe Biden, William Barr, Donald Trump, Obama et al involved in the agreement took a substantial step in pursuance of the agreement; and
TO PROMOTE THE CRIMINAL EN
(4) That any of these acts occurred in the District of Columbap
conspired and continue to conspire with Donald Trump, Joe Biden(Hillary Clinton/Hunter Biden sham e-mail investigation VIA fake sham Prosecutor(s) – sham investigation see below) & all U.S. Supreme Court Justices including to defraud US “the two witnesses” out of money and property without due process of law, & defraud the the U.S.A.in 18 U.S.C. SECTION 371 Kamala Harris(Harris deceitfully without the right and/or qualifications swore Garland in as U.S. Attorney General of the United States FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE to FURTHER EXPLOIT & DEFRAUD SHARON AND JAMES “collect, extort, OBTAIN BENEFIT MAND money from Corporations(“what lawfully belongs to “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR) of fraudulent documethe two witnesses) based on his own fraud in U.S., Court of Appeals
In furtherance Two witnesses, victims and/or “informant(Whistleblowers)”
18 U.S. Code § 1513 and multiple other Crimes )all to obtain 125 Trillion “literally”(see below) to aid, abet, conspire, act in joint participation all conspired to defraud the two witnesses and/or U.S. Citizens, & U.S.A. out of money and property without due process of law and conspired with China[Xi Jinping] – “the Dragon” et al – CRIMINALS) “literally”(see below) CONSPIRING WITH FOREIGN OFFICIAL TO DESTROY THE TWO WITNESSES AND/OR HUMANTY VIA THE COV-19 “BIOTERROR/BIOLOGICAL WARFARE
SEE BELOW
All have been convicted in a lawful/legal court of law, FOR TREASON, GENOCIDE AND OTHER CRIMES(see below) AND FOR THEIR CONSPIRACY TO DESTROY AMERICA & DESTROY & ENSLAVE THE TWO WITNESSES, U.S. CITIZENS & HUMANITY “LITERALLY!!” THE ABOVE PICTURE DEPICTS “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR” (A PERSON BY LAW WITH “LEGAL, LAWFUL STANDING” TO ACT AS JUDGE, PROSECUTOR ET AL) IN “THIS” CRIMINAL TRIAL!!(SEE BELOW) “LITERALLY!!”
A. The 50 States” ex rel Sharon Bridgewater Private Attorney General and/or Relator Satisfies the Requirements for Intervention of Right
1. The “50 States” ex rel Sharon Bridgewater Private Attorney General and/or Relator intervention is Timely Courts has identified several factors relevant to determining whether a request for intervention is timely: (1) the length of time during which the proposed intervener knew or reasonably should have known of the interest in the case before moving to intervene; (2) the extent of prejudice to the existing parties as a result of the proposed intervener’s failure to move for intervention as soon as it knew or reasonably should have known of its interest; (3) the extent of prejudice to the proposed intervener if the motion is denied; and (4) the existence of unusual circumstances militating either for or against a determination that their motion was timely.
2. The “50 States” ex rel Sharon Bridgewater Private Attorney General and/or Relator has a Substantial Legal Interest in this Litigation
3. The Disposition of the Instant Litigation May Impair the United States’ Ability to Protect Its Interest
4. The Existing Parties(Sharon Bridgewater and/or James S. Bridgewater) Do Not Adequately Represent the United States. The fourth and final element to justify intervention of right is inadequate representation of the proposed intervener’s interest by existing parties to the litigation.
“RETROACTIVE”[JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT]AMENDMENT TO THE TWELFTH U.S. CONSTITITION
THIS IS A “RETROACTIVE-JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT “DOMESTIC & INTERNATIONAL- PUBLIC/PRIVATE WORLD-WIDE PARTNERSHIP[INCLUDING MOST IF NOT ALL U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLIC OFFICIALS, ALL HEADS OF STATE, ALL UNITED NATIONS MEMBERS including Nikki Haley UN Representative under Donald Trump, ALL WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION MEMBERS, ALL EUROPEAN UNION(E.U.) MEMBERS, WORLD ECONOMIC FOREIGN MEMBERS, ALL MAJOR CORPORATIONS, DIRECTORS,
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, ET AL – AKA “THE COV-19 INJECTION BIO-TERROR, BIOLIOGICAL WARFARE EXTERMINATION OF (THE TWO WITNESSES) HUMANITY ENTERPRIZE” CRIMINAL PROSECUTION – “WHICH PROVIDES FOR THE DEATH PENALTY” FOR ONE OR MORE VIOLATIONS OF THE NUREMBERG CODE, TREASON VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. 2381 , HEINOUS CRIMES FOR “HACKING” THE TWO WITNESSES[“AND HUMANITY”] BRAIN, NERVOUS SYSTEM, INTERFERRING WITH FREE WILL VIA THE COVID-19 INJECTION[AND FOOD, WATER ETC.) A BIOWEAPON(SEE BELOW EVIDENCE)
OVERT ACT ALL U.S. SENATORS ALL ARE RESPONSIBLE(know very, very soon “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR WILL SOON ARREST, ETC.) & BECAUSE THEY ARE SUBJECT TO THE DEATH PENALTY(now sides with Doctors)TOOK ACTION AS FOLLOWS:
On or about JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT, Defendants[foreign officials and Heads of state as well as U.S. Public Official and Major Corporations] entered into one or more International treaties[such as Declaration for human rights, Violence and Women, Elimination of all forms of discrimination, Genocide, extermination, sterilization, not to violate the Numerberg Code, Hague, as well as certain other agreements including but not limited to VIOLATED THE TWO WITNESS the right to free will, and the right of the brain, neuro system, etc. not to be hacked etc. , HUD lease agreement, to lease certain descripition ]. Hereafter these agreements are collectively referred to as the “Agreement.” Copies of the agreements are attached as Exh “designation of exhibit” and are incorporated in this Paragraph __as though fully stated herein.
Pursuant to the Agreement Defendant was responsible for making ____________. Section ___of the Master agreement provides as follows:
-CLICK HERE FOR TREATIES ENTERED INTO WITH SHARON AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER ALL HEADS OF STATE AND FOREIGN OFFICIALS CONSPIRED WITH MAJOR[TECH]CORPORATIONS AND OTHER MAJOR CORPORATIONS, U.S. PUBLIC OFFICIALS ACTING IN THEIR INDIVIDUAL CAPACITIES VIOLATED INTERNATIONAL LAW AND TREATES
TREATIES ARE NOT CANCELLABLE; DEFENDANTS “HEADS OF STATE,” FOREIGN OFFICIALS AS WELL AS U.S. PUBLIC OFFICIALS, ACTING IN JOINT PARTICIPATION WITH MAJOR CORPORATIONS OFFICERS, DIRECTORS, ETC. OBLIGATIONS ARE ABSOLUTE!!
all knowing, intentionally discriminated against the two witness, breached intentional treaties and contract and caused the two witnesses(Sharon and/or James S. Bridgewater) injuries and damages, AND ARE LIABLE AND SUBJECT TO THE DEATH PENALTY!!
SEE THIS WEBSITE](See below for Ex Rel Private Attorney General and/or Relator Definition)RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY AND “CRIMINAL DECLARATORY JUDMENT &/OR ADJUDIFICATION BROUGHT AGAINST, – 1ST “THE “50 STATES” EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND RELATOR VS. MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS “DECACTO” OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ATTORNEY GENERAL[AND PREDECESSOR FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUNING THRU TO HIS TERM INCLUDING ALL ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR SPECIAL PROSECUTORS APPOINTED BY THESE U.S.ATTORNEY GENERALS]ILLEGAL USUPATION OF OFFICE AND TO AJUDICATE THE RIGHT TO THE OFFICE(“ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE U.S.A. AND/OR “THE 50 STATES”)AND ALL U.S. PRESIDENT,
(1) In actions brought against persons for usurpation of office, the judgment may determine the right of the defendant to hold the office. If a party plaintiff alleges that he is entitled to the office, the court may decide which of the parties is entitled to hold the office.
(2) If judgment is rendered in favor of a party who is averred to be entitled to the office, he is entitled, after taking the oath of office, and executing any official bond which is required by law, to take the office. Such party shall be given all the books and papers in the custody of the defendant, or within his power, belonging to the office.
COMMON LAW – ALL WRITS VIA THE RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND
he All Writs Act is a United States federal statute, codified at 28 U.S.C. § 1651, which authorizes the United States federal courts to “issue all writs necessary or appropriate in aid of their respective jurisdictions and agreeable to the usages and principles of law.”
VERIFICATION
STATE OF MICHIGAN )
AND/OR MARYLAND )
) SS:
)
)
COUNTY OF OAKLAND )
I being duly sworn disposes and says:
I Sharon Bridgewater Pro Se – Counsel- “Authorized Agent for the “United 50 States, et al” via via THE STATE of Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming[the District of Columbia, the Common wealth of Puerto Rico, The US Virgin Island, Guam, theNorthern Marianna Islands, the American Samoa] EX REL Sharon Bridgewater (A.K.A. Sharon Abusalem, Sharon Davis) Private Attorney General and QUI TAM RELATOR[The Federal Trade Commission, The Bureau of Consumer Protection, Bureau of Competition, Securities and Exchange Commission]on behalf of myself, James S. Bridgewater( one or more of the following companies, Specialty Investment Group L.L.C., a Georgia Company, Specialty Global Investments Inc., a Nevada Corporation, and Bridgewater & Company Inc., a California Corporation, The Coalition for Empowerment(formerly Greater Lansing Helping Hands)a 501C-3 non-profit organization, a Michigan and/or Georgia non-profit corporation, B & B Building Maintenance INC. a Michigan Corporation, and those similarly situated – “ALL PLAINTIFFS,” “ALL APPELLANTS,” ALL CLAIMANTS,” FROM 1993 and continuing thru present “CLASS APPELLANT AND/OR PLAINTIFF AND PETITIONER REPRESENTATIVE” have read the foregoing PETITION FOR COMMON LAW WRIT OF CERTORARI TO REVIEW THE ALCOHOL, TABACCO AND FIREARMS(ATF), AGENCY AND/OR BOARD, THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINSTRATION COMMISSION, ONE OR MORE EXECUTIVE ACTIONS, AND FOR EXTRAORDINARY WRITS IN NATURE OF MANDUMUS, WRITS OF PROHIBITION, WRITS OF QUO WARRANTO, WRITS OF ATTACHMENT(BODY AND PROPERTY), WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS ON APPEAL FROM THE 17TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN and know the contents thereof and the same is is ture to the best of my knowledge, except as to the matters therein sated to be on information and belief, and as to those matters I believe it to be true. In addition I have read the foregoing petition have read the foregoing petition to appear and practice in this court to file the notice of appeal and know the contents thereof. The same is true of my own knowledge, and I/we except as to those matters which are therein alleged on information and belief, and as to those matters, I believe it to be true; and/or under penalty and perjury or pursuant to USC 1746.
I certify and/or Declare and/or state under penalty and perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed 2nd day of May 2016 in Detroit, Michigan
_____________________________________
Sharon Bridgewater Pro Se – Counsel- “Authorized Agent for the “United 50 States, et al” via “The 50 United States ” EX REL Sharon Bridgewater (A.K.A. Sharon Abusalem, Sharon Davis) Private Attorney General and QUI TAM RELATOR[The Federal Trade Commission, The Bureau of Consumer Protection, Bureau of Competition, Securities and Exchange Commission]on behalf of myself, James S. Bridgewater( one or more of the following companies, Specialty Investment Group L.L.C., a
Georgia Company, Specialty Global Investments Inc., a
Nevada Corporation, and Bridgewater & Company Inc., a
California Corporation, The Coalition for
Empowerment(formerly Greater Lansing Helping Hands)a
501C-3 non-profit organization, a Michigan and/or Georgia
non-profit corporation, B & B Building Maintenance INC.
a Michigan Corporation, and those similarly situated – “ALL PLAINTIFFS,” “ALL APPELLANTS,” ALL CLAIMANTS,” FROM 1993 and continuing thru present
p.p BOX 19631
Detroit, MI 48219
1-313-471-8714
AUTHORITY/STANDING
CVIA CONSUMING, FOOD, WATER ETC.:
“A RESEARCHER TESTIFY ABOUT THE COV-19 BIOWEAPON AS FOLLOWS”
(HUNDREDS AND/OR THOUSANDS OF LAWYERS AND/OR DOCTORS HAVE STARTED CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE PERPETRATORS FOR “BILLIONS” OF VIOLATIONS OF THE NUREMBERG CODE FOR EXPERIMENTAL COVID INJECTION “DEATH” JAB THAT: 1)CHANGE MEN AND WOMEN DNA AND/OR GENES, 2)PATENT MEN AND WOMEN FOR ENSLAVMENT AND “GLOBAL ELITE” OWNERSHIP, 3) THAT CONCEALED KNOWN FACTS FROM HUMANITY” AND THE TWO WITNESSES THEY WERE UNDER A DUTY TO DISCLOSE PUT DEFENSE ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECT AGENCY(DARPHA) BIOWEAPON HYDROGELS NANO TECHNOLOGIES AND/OR IMPLANTABLE NANOTECHNOLOGY IN “THE TWO WITNESSES AND/OR HUMANITY” VIA THE “RAZORBLADE COVID-19 INJECTION DEATH JAB(SEE THIS WEBSITE)” WITH FRAUD, FORCE AND/OR COERCION WITHOUT THE CONSENT AND WHICH HAVE KILLED MILLIONS(AND WILL KILL BILLIONS IN THE FUTURE)INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO BABY FORMULAS ,BUT HAVE BEEN UNSUCCESSFUL TO IM https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuremberg_CodeAND ATTEMPTED TO FOR INSTANCE DR. ROBERT FUELLMICH, AND COUNTLESS OTHERS HAVE STARTED CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE “INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL RACKET” BUT ARE UNABLE TO JUDGE AND/OR SENTENCE(AND/OR “JAIL”) THE PERPATRATORS BECAUSE THEY LACK STANDING – SEE BELOW FOR DEFINTION OF STANDING )VIA THE RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATION ACT AND ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME LAW COMMON LAW (SEE BELOW)
COMES NOW “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWAER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR [WITH ARREST WARRANTS, ADJUDICATION DECLARATORY JUDGMENT ENTITLED “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR REALTOR VS. MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS “DEFACTO” OFFICIAL CAPACITY AND/OR INDIVIDUALLYAND/OR JUDGMENT, SENTENCE OF MERRICK GARLAND -SEE BELOW) AND ALSO ADJUDIFICATION & DECLARE THAT ALL SPECIAL PROSECUTORS, AND OTHER APPOINTMENTS BY MERRICK GARLAND AS ATTORNEY GENERAL INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, JACK SMITH, COLONEL CLEMENTS[AND/OR ALL STATE,
(on this same day I posted the above – Garland attempts to cover up – FRAUD AS FOLLOWS:
LOCAL ETC. U.S. LAW ENFORCMENT OFFICERS OPERATING UNDER GARLAND AND/OR CLEMENTS “AKA all U.S. D.O.J. EMPLOYEES AND/OR ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS employed by the U.S. Government” ET AL ,
and
ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT JUDGES
all Appellant Court Judges, District Court Judges, State Court Judges, Administrative Court Judges “AKA all U.S. Judges employed by the U.S. Government” Administrative Court Judges unlawfully, illegally employed by or associated with “COV-19 INJECTION” – BIO-TERROR, BIOLOGICAL WARFARE ENTERPRISE engaged in, or the activities affect, interstate or foreign commerce, and all conduct or participate, directly or indirectly, in the conduct of such enterprise’s affairs through a pattern of racketeering activity or collection of unlawful debt and/or conspired to violate
It shall be unlawful for any person to conspire to violate any of the provisions of subsection (a), (b), or (c) of this section, AND “THE 50 STATES EX RES SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RESLOTR THE TWO WITNESSES BOTH SHARON AND/OR JAEMS S. BRIDGEWATER HAV
SENTENCE OF MERRICK GARLAND -SEE BELOW) AND ALSO DECLARE THAT ALL SPECIAL PROSECUTORS, AND OTHER APPOINTMENTS BY MERRICK GARLAND AS ATTORNEY GENERAL INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, JACK SMITH, ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, ALL U.S. APPEALLANT COURT JUDGES, ALL FEDERAL, STAT employed by or associated with any enterprise engaged in, or the activities of which affect, interstate or foreign commerce, to conduct or participate, directly or indirectly, in the conduct of such enterprise’s affairs through a pattern of racketeering activity or collection of unlawful debt.
It shall be unlawful for any person to conspire to violate any of the provisions of subsection (a), (b), or (c) of this section.
ARE JUDGMENTS, SHADOW ORDERS, WRITS, ETC. court settlements for example:
MONSANTO SETTLEMENTS Exposure to the herbicide Roundup (glyphosate)
FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT ARE NULL AND VOID AND WITHOUT ANY LEGAL EFFECT!!
ARE NULL AND VOID AND WITHOUT ANY LEGAL EFFECT
IN ADDITION TO THE ABOVE & THE TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION SENT ON JAN. 6, 2023
(ANNIVERSITY OF U.S. CAPITOL ATTACKS
IN ADDITION TO THE TRO/ PRENOTICE & AFFIDAVIT OF “THE 50 STATES” EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR AMENDED TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION(ADDING ADDITIONAL DEFENDANTS & ENJOINING RESTRAIN CO-CONSPIRATORS JACOB ROTHCHILD ROTHCHILD[OWNER AND CONTROLLER OF MOST IF NOT ALL WORLD BANKS- & WITH ARREST WARRANTS, ADJUDICATION AND/OR JUDGMENT, SENTENCE OF ROTHCHILD et al SEE BELOW],
CHINA’S XI JINPING[WITH ARREST WARRANTS, ADJUDICATION AND/OR JUDGMENT, SENTENCE OF XI JINPING -SEE BELOW],
FROM ENGAGING IN A PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY, FROM DEFRAUDING THE U.S.A. IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 371, AND FROM CONTINUING TO DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES[FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO 2008 AND FURTHER CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT] VIOLATIONS OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY(AND/OR THE TWO WITNESSES), VIOLATIONS OF THE NUREMBERG CODE(THE PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS IS “DEATH”)
WHICH INCLUDES EXECUTIONS BY ONE OR MORE FIRING SQUAD, ELECTROCUTION, POISONOUS GAS CHAMBER AS THE FOLLOWS:
VIA THE COVID-19 MILITARY GRADE(“Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency[DARPHA]) BIOLOGICAL WARFARE INFECTIOUS DISEASE BIOTERROR INJECTION CONTAINING “LUCIFER” “RACE” – LUCIFERASE DNA ALTERING NANOTECH BRAIN CONTROLLING INJECTION”KNOWINGLY, INTENTIONALLY, PURPOSEFULLY UNLEASHED ON FIVE[5.5] BILLION PEOPLE(“AND COUNTING SEE BELOW) VIA CERTIFIED MAIL TO JACOB ROTHCHILD, XI JINPING, EUROPEAN UNION PRESIDENT(E.U.), DONALD TRUMP[WITH ARREST WARRANTS, ADJUDICATION AND/OR JUDGMENT, SENTENCE OF TRUMP – SEE BELOW],
THE POPE – VATICAN IN ADDITION TO THE TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER/PERMANENT INJUNCTION SENT VIA CERTIFIED MAIL TO BIDEN, HARRIS, GARLAND AND CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS ON JAN. 6, 2023 – CLICK HERE
January 25, 2021 TRUMP IMPEACHED
ON JSN. BIDEN GRANT CHINA U.S. SOVEREIGNTY ON HIS FIRST DAY OF OFFICE & IS BIDEN IMPEACHMENT(1/21/2021 IST DAY IN OFFICE) JOINDER OF PARTIES AND/OR CONSOLIDATION OF CASES IN MPEACHMENT”UNDER SEAL” FRAUD!!
IN FURTHERNCE OF THE CONSPIRACY PEOL
KAMAL HARRIS “FASLELY” SWEARING GARALND IN AS U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
(IN ADDITION TO THE ABOVE K. HARRIS TERROR VISIT, ON 1-12-2023, ON THIS SAME DAY CO-CONSPIRATORS, GARLAND, BIDEN, TRUMP ET AL CONCOCT A
BIDEN, TRUMP, GARLAND, ILLEGALLY, UNLAWFULLY, WITHOUT THE AUTHORITY, “SHAM” APPO
NOTICE AND AJUDIFICATION DECLARATORY JUDGMENT “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GE
AND BELOW], IN ADDITION TO A “SHAM” HUNTER BIDEN AND BIDEN’S DOCS INVESTIGATION, moves or travels in interstate or foreign commerce with intent to one or more avoid prosecution, or custody or confinement and/or conviction, under the laws of the U.S. via the Racketeered Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act and/or Admiralty and Maritime law[“THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR”] punishable by death IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S. Code § 1073
https://nypost.com/2023/01/12/wh-admits-more-classified-docs-found-in-bidens-delaware-garage/
NOTICE AND AJUDIFICATION DECLARATORY JUDGMENT “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL RETROACTIVE APPOINTMENT OF PRESIDENT[FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT] OF THE 50 STATES UNITED STATES AND/OR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA VIA ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME LAW AND/OR THE RACKETEERED INFLUENCED(CLICK HERE) ADJUDIFICATION THAT ALL U.S. PRESIDENTS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESIDENT IS NULL AND VOID AND WITHOUT ANY LEGAL EFFECT, ALL ILLEGALLY, UNLAWFULLY CONCEALED KNOWN DECLARATORY JUDGMENT(SEE THIS WEBSITE)
BIDEN, TRUMP, GARLAND, ILLEGALLY, UNLAWFULLY, WITHOUT THE AUTHORITY, “SHAM” APPO
JAN. 12, 2023
MERRICK GARLAND[WITH ARREST WARRANTS, ADJUDICATION AND/OR JUDGMENT, SENTENCE OF MERRICK GARLAND – SEE BELOW DECLARATORY JUDGMENT ENTITLED “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR REALTOR VS. MERRICK GARLAND], NAMES TRUMP’S Robert K. Hur(ASIAN AMERICAN),
who will take over the investigation, was Maryland’s top federal prosecutor for almost three years, between April 2018 and February 2021, and was appointed by President Donald Trump.(SPECIAL AS PROSECUTOR – WITH ARREST WARRANTS, ADJUDICATION AND/OR JUDGMENT, SENTENCE FOR ROBERT K. HUR) WITHOUT LAWFUL AUTHORITY
https://www.cnn.com/2023/01/12/politics/joe-biden-classified-documents-counsels-office/index.html
HIRES TRUMP’S CO-CONSPIRATOR Robert K. Hur(ASIAN AMERICAN), who will take over the investigation, was Maryland’s top federal prosecutor for almost three years, between April 2018 and February 2021, and was appointed by President Donald Trump.
https://apnews.com/article/biden-classified-documents-updates-e506a5c4094356cf4c7d11f8fb3d23b4
https://www.cnn.com/2022/08/08/politics/mar-a-lago-search-warrant-fbi-donald-trump/index.html
SHAM BIDEN[WITH ARREST WARRANTS, ADJUDICATION AND/OR JUDGMENT, SENTENCE JOE BIDEN – FOR KNOWINGLY, INTENTIONALLY, CONSPIRING WITH “GLOBAL ELITE CRIMINALS” CONCEALING FROM THE TWO WITNESSES AND U.S. CITIZENS, HE WAS UNDER A DUTY TO DISCLOSE – ISSUING ONE OR MORE EXECUTIVE ORDERS 1)”MAKING U.S. CITIZENS(AND/OR THE TWO WITNESSES) TRANSHUMANS WITHOUT KNOWLEDGE OR CONSENT, 2) GRANTING CHINA’S XI JINPING(AND/OR THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION PRESIDENT A MARXIST TERROR) SOVERIGNTY OVER THE TWO WITNESS, U.S. CITIZENS AND/OR THE U.S. ON HIS FIRST DAY AS “DEFACTO” PRESIDENT OF THE U.S. BASED ON “FRAUD & DECEIT,” 3) FOR ISSUING EXECUTIVE ORDER # 14067 “DIGITAL ASSETS,” TO DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES AND U.S. CITIZENS OUT OF ALL MONEY AND PROPERTY IN THE BANK, VIOLATIONS OF THE NUREMBERG CODE VIA THE “MANDATING” THE COVID/DNA ALTERING-NANO TECH INJECTION
ALL ARE AIDING, ABETTING CHINA AND RUSSIA TO CONSOLIDATE THE U.S. WITH CHINA AND INTO A COMMUNIST COUNTRY(NO MORE U.S. CONSTUTIONAL RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS)
ALL PUBLIC U.S. GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS are unlawfully, illegally defined as persons employed by or associated with a biological warfare enterprise engaged in, or the activities of which affect, interstate or foreign commerce, to conduct or participate, directly or indirectly, in the conduct of such enterprise’s affairs through a pattern of racketeering activity or collection of unlawful debt. DOMESTIC ARE REPSONSIBLE FOR Treason against the United States, levying War against the U.S., the two witnesses, or in adhering to China and/or Russia by giving them Aid and Comfort(Granting China sovereignty of the U.S.
NOTICE OF “COMMON LAW CONVENTION OF THE 50 STATES” AND NOTICE OF ADDITIONAL AMENDMENT(28TH) TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION AND Universal Declaration of Human Rights TO INCLUDE NEURORIGHTS protecting the brain and its activity as neurotechnology advances.
over the U.S. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court. THE COVID-19 INJECTION, CONSPIR – NANOTECH – JAN. 6, 2021 CAPITOL ATTACKS!!
IN FURTHERNCE OF THE CONSPIRACY PEOL
NOTICE AND AFFIDIVANT OF RETROACTIVE INTERVENTION PURSUANT TO FRCP 24(A)- (SEE BELOW), NOTICE OF ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME CLAIMS[RETROACTIVE FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT), NOTICE OF PUBLICATION OF INTERNATIONAL FORFEITURE(ASSETS LOCATED ABROAD UNDER U.S. LAW AND/OR Forfeiture of Assets Located in the United States under Foreign Law)FORFEITURE OF ALL TANGIBLE AND INTANGLE PROPERTY PUBLICATION & “COMMON LAW”
PUBLIC NOTICE OF OPEN COURT HEARING AND/OR TRIAL[RETROACTIVE FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT] VIA ADMIRALITY AND MARITIME “COMMON LAW” REMEDIES AND THE RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATION ACT(RICO)
NOTICE OF FORFEITURE OF
PROPERTY PURSUANT TO
“THE RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATION ACT” & ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME CLAIM – SUPPLIMENTAL RULE G – FORFEITURE ACTION IN REM(“RETROACTIVE FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT & THE “50 STATES” EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR GIVES ALL DEFENDANTS NOTICE PURSUANT TO 18 USC SECTION 1963D
AND SUMMARY ADJUDIFICATION OF FORFEITURE BY A LAWFUL JUDGE SEE BELOW:
(The property is within the District of Columbia and/or other districts or will be during the pendency of the action). All Writs Act is a United States federal statute, codified at 28 U.S.C. § 1651, which authorizes the United States federal courts to “issue all writs necessary or appropriate in aid of their respective jurisdictions and agreeable to the usages and principles of law, pursuant to Admiralty and Maritime Common law and the Racketeered influenced and Corrupt Organization act, which includes one or more WRIT OF EXECUTION, WRIT OF ENTRY, LIST
On February 8, 2012, CBP published in the Federal Register (77 FR 6527) a proposed rule to amend title 19 of the Code of Federal Regulations (19 CFR) regarding the manner by which CBP provides notice of intent to forfeit seized property appraised at more than $5,000 and seized property appraised at $5,000 or less. CBP proposed to utilize the Department of Justice (DOJ) forfeiture Web site, located at www.forfeiture.gov,, to post seizure and forfeiture notices for property appraised in excess of $5,000 in value for 30 consecutive days, including seizures by the U.S. Border Patrol, where appropriate. This internet
(1)The following property is subject to forfeiture to “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR INCLUDES BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO ALL “GLOBAL BANKS, ” THE U.S. FEDERAL RESERVE, THE INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND, ETC. FOR ROTHCHILD AND CO-CONSPIRATORS transaction or attempted transaction in violation of section 1956, 1957 or 1960 traceable to such property. All property, real or personal, within the jurisdiction of the United States and/or Internationally, constituting, derived from, or traceable to, a proceeds obtained directly or indirectly from an offense committed in joint participation with “foreign nations and/or head of state,” and property used to facilitate the offenses which involves trafficking in nuclear, chemical, biological, or radiological weaponsconduct described in section 1956(c)(7)(B);punishable within the jurisdiction of the foreign nation and/or the U.S. by death or imprisonment for a term exceeding 1 year; and punishable under the laws of the United States by imprisonment for a term exceeding 1 year, for offenses occurred within the jurisdiction of the United States. in addition all property, real or personal, derived from proceeds traceable to a violation ofsection 215, 471, 472, 473, 474, 476, 477, 478, 479, 480, 481, 485, 486, 487, 488, 501, 502, 510, 542, 545, 656, 657, 670, 842, 844, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1014, 1028, 1029, 1030, 1032, or 1344 of offense constituting “specified unlawful activity” (as defined in section 1956(c)(7) of this title), or a conspiracy to commit such offense. Even further, all r property, real or personal, traceable to the gross receipts obtained, directly or indirectly, from a violation of—section 666(a)(1) (relating to Federal program fraud); section 1001 (relating to fraud and false statements); section 1031 (relating to major fraud against the United States); section 1032 (relating to concealment of assets from conservator or receiver of insured financial institution); section 1341 (relating to mail fraud); or section 1343 (relating to wire fraud),for violations which relates to the sale of assets acquired or held by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as conservator or receiver for a financial institution, or any other conservator for a financial institution appointed by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency or the National Credit Union Administration, as conservator or liquidating agent for a financial institution. Continuing even further, respect to an offense listed in subsection (a)(1)(D) committed for the purpose of executing or attempting to execute any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent statements, pretenses, representations or promises, the gross receipts of such an offense shall include all property, real or personal, tangible or intangible, which thereby is obtained, directly or indirectly allproperty, real or personal, which represents or is traceable to the gross proceeds obtained, directly or indirectly, from a violation of the “”COVID-19 BIOLOGICAL WARFARE DOMESTIC AND INTERNATIONAL TERRRORIST ENTERPRIZE” which consist of many individuals, entities, or organization engaged in planning or perpetrating any any 1 Federal crime of terrorism (as defined in section 2332b(g)(5)) against the United States, citizens(the two witnesses both Sharon Bridgewater and/or James S. Bridgewater) or residents of the United States, or their property, and all assets, foreign or domestic, affording any person a source of influence over any such entity or organization; acquired or maintained by any person with the intent and for the purpose of supporting, planning, conducting, or concealing any Federal crime of terrorism (as defined in section 2332b(g)(5) [2] against the United States, citizens or residents of the United States, or their property; derived from, involved in, or used or intended to be used to commit any Federal crime of terrorism (as defined in section 2332b(g)(5)) against the United States, citizens or residents of the United States, or their property; or of any individual, entity, or organization engaged in planning or perpetrating any act of international terrorism (as defined in section 2331) against any international organization (as defined in section 209 of the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 (22 U.S.C. 4309(b)) or against any foreign Government.[3] Where the property sought for forfeiture is located beyond the territorial boundaries of the United States, an act in furtherance of such planning or perpetration must have occurred within the jurisdiction of the United States Any property, real or personal, involved in a violation or attempted violation, or which constitutes or is derived from proceeds traceable to a violation, of section 2339C of this title. Any property, real or personal, that is involved in a violation or attempted violation, or which constitutes or is derived from proceeds traceable to a prohibition imposed pursuant to section 104(a) of the North Korea Sanctions and Policy Enhancement Act of 2016.
ONLINE PUBLICATION OF FORFEITURE as provided in:
NOTICE TO ALL DEFENDANTS – NO RIGHT TO JURY TRIAL – SEE 32.2(E)
- Rule 32.2(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure; or
- 28 CFR Part 8.9, Rule G of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions.
AND SUMMARY ADJUDIFICATION OF FORFEITURE BY A LAWFUL JUDGE SEE BELOW:
(The property is within the District of Columbia and/or other districts or will be during the pendency of the action).
(WHICH AUTHORIZES & PERMITS “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR – ONE OF TWO VICTIMS[AND WITNESSES], INJURED AND DAMAGED IN BUSINESS, PERSON OR PROPERTY AND RESTRAINED FROM INTERSTATE AND FOREIGN FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUNING THRU TO PRESENT BY ONE OR MORE JACOB ROTHCHILD(OWNER AND CONTROLLER OF MOST IF NOT ALL “GLOBAL CENTRAL BANKS, ” U.K.’S Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, “European Union President Ursula von der Leyen, Anthony Fauci, former Chief Medical Advisor to Donald Trump and/or Joe Biden, Klaus Schwab Founder and Executive Chairman of the World Economic Forum, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus Director general of the World Health Organization (AND PREDECESSORS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT,
ADDITIONAL DEFENDANTS
TRO, PERMANENT INJUNCTION OF GARLAND, TRUMP, BIDEN RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY VIA (SEE BELOW CERTIFIED LETTER SENT TO MERRICK GARLAND, SMITH AND ROBERT HUR “FAKE, SHAM PROSECUTION”(SEE
https://apnews.com/article/biden-classified-documents-updates-e506a5c4094356cf4c7d11f8fb3d23b4
https://www.cnn.com/2022/08/08/politics/mar-a-lago-search-warrant-fbi-donald-trump/index.html
COMES NOW TO TWO WITNESSES[“RETROACTIVE FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT] gives this “TESTIMONY” AND/OR CONFESSION IN OPEN COURT ADJUDICATES, CONVICTS, JUDGE, “RETROACTIVELY FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUNG THRU TO PRESENT]SENTENCE JOE BIDEN{and predecessor from Jan. 1, 1993 and continuing thru to his term and/or those operating under his direction including but not limited to MERRICK GARLAND, DONALD TRUMP, KAMALA HARRIS, U.S. Representatives, Congressman and women, all U.S. Supreme Court Justices, MAJOR TECH. CORPORATIONS(OFFICERS, PRESIDENTS, ETC.) JACOB ROTHCHILD(“OWNER AND CONTROLLER” OF U.S. FEDERAL RESERVE, AND MOST IF NOT ALL GLOBAL CENTRAL BANKS ET AL FOR TREASON, levying War against the two witnesses, THE U.S.A., citizens of the U.S., and adhering to the enemies of the U.S. [one or more foreign official acting on behalf of Russia, China, Germany etc.] their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort within the United States of America.(all are guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.) Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court. REBELLION AND INSURRECTION knowingly, intentionally, incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection in violation of 18 U.S. Code § 2383 and against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto( shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States)
VIOLATIONS OF 18 USC SECTION(S)1956, 1957, or 1960 of conspiracy to violate one or more section 215, 656, 657, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1014,1341, 1343, or 1344 of this title, affecting a financial
institution, or 18 usc section 471, 472, 473, 474, 476, 477, 478, 479, 480,
481, 485, 486, 487, 488, 501, 502, 510, 542, 545, 555, 842,
844, 1028, 1029, or 1030, one or more 18 u.s.c. section 666(a)(1) (relating to Federal program
fraud); 18 usc section 1001 (relating to fraud and false statements); 18 usc section section 1031 (relating to major fraud against the United States); 18 u.s.c. section 1032 (relating to concealment of assets; 18 usc section 1341 (relating to mail fraud); or 18 u.s.c. section 1343 (relating to wire fraud),
involving the sale of assets acquired or held by the
the [FN1] Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as
conservator or receiver for a financial institution or any
other conservator for a financial institution appointed
by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, or the
National Credit Union Administration, as conservator or
liquidating agent for a financial institution, shall order
that the person forfeit to the United States any property,
real or personal, which represents or is traceable to the
gross receipts obtained, directly or indirectly, as a result
of such violation.
(4) With respect to an offense listed in subsection (a)(3)
committed for the purpose of executing or attempting to
execute any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining
money or property by means of false or fraudulent statements,
pretenses, representations, or promises, the gross receipts of
such an offense shall include any property, real or personal,
tangible or intangible, which is obtained, directly or indirectly,
as a result of such offense.
(5) The court, in imposing sentence on a person convicted
of a violation or conspiracy to violate—
(C) section 2119 (armed robbery of automobiles);
(D) section 2312 (transporting stolen motor vehicles in
interstate commerce); or
(E) section 2313 (possessing or selling a stolen motor
vehicle that has moved in interstate commerce);
shall order that the person forfeit to the United States
any property, real or personal, which represents or is
traceable to the gross proceeds obtained, directly or
indirectly, as a result of such violation.
(6)(A) The court, in imposing sentence on a person
convicted of a violation of, or conspiracy to violate, section
274(a), 274A(a)(1), or 274A(a)(2) of the Immigration and
Nationality Act or section 555, 1425, 1426, 1427, 1541,
1542, 1543, 1544, or 1546 of this title, or a violation of, or
conspiracy to violate, section 1028 of this title if committed in
connection with passport or visa issuance or use, shall order
that the person forfeit to the United States, regardless of any
provision of State law—
(i) any conveyance, including any vessel, vehicle, or
aircraft used in the commission of the offense of which
the person is convicted; and
(ii) any property real or personal—
(I) that constitutes, or is derived from or is
traceable to the proceeds obtained directly or
indirectly from the commission of the offense of
which the person is convicted; or
(II) that is used to facilitate, or is intended to be
used to facilitate, the commission of the offense of
which the person is convicted.
(B) The court, in imposing sentence on a person
described in subparagraph (A), shall order that the person
forfeit to the United States all property described in that
subparagraph.
(7) The court, in imposing sentence on a person convicted
of a Federal health care offense, shall order the person to
forfeit property, real or personal, that constitutes or is derived,
directly or indirectly, from gross proceeds traceable to the
commission of the offense.
38 • Asset Forfeiture Statutes
18 U.S.C. § 983
(8) The court, in sentencing a defendant convicted of an
offense under section 1028, 1029, 1341, 1342, 1343, or 1344,
or of a conspiracy to commit such an offense, if the offense
involves telemarketing (as that term is defined in section
2325), shall order that the defendant forfeit to the United
States any real or personal property—
(A) used or intended to be used to commit, to facilitate,
or to promote the commission of such offense; and
(B) constituting, derived from, or traceable to the gross
proceeds that the defendant obtained directly or indirectly
as a result of the offense.
(b)(1) The forfeiture of property under this section, including
any seizure and disposition of the property and any related
judicial or administrative proceeding, shall be governed by
the provisions of section 413 (other than subsection (d) of
that section) of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention
and Control Act of 1970 (21 U.S.C. 853).
(2) The substitution of assets provisions of subsection
413(p) shall not be used to order a defendant to forfeit assets
in place of the actual property laundered where such defendant
acted merely as an intermediary who handled but did not retain
the property in the course of the money laundering offense
unless the defendant, in committing the offense or offenses
giving rise to the forfeiture, conducted three or more separate
transactions involving a total of $100,000 or more in any
twelve month period.
Amended: Border Tunnel Prevention Act, Pub. L. 112-127
CONTINUING CONSPIRACY TO ENGAGE IN A PATTERN OR RACKETEERING ACTIVITY[CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT GENOCIDE, WAR CRIMES, VIOLATION OF THE NUREMBERG CODE, BIOTERRORI – LIST RETAILATION AGAINST TWO FEDERAL WITNESSES
EXPLOITING THE TWO WITNESSES, VIOLATIONS OF OATH OF OFFICE, ABUSING U.S. COURTS, feloniously stealing, taking away, alters, falsifies, or otherwise records, writ, process, or other proceeding, in the U.S. District Court, Court of Appeals for the D.C Circuit(Merrick Garland Chief Judge and other co-conspirators K.B, Jackson – U.S. Supreme Court Judge and other Judges and in the U.S. Supreme Court )any court of the United States, o acknowledges, or procures to be acknowledged in any such court, any recognizance, bail, or judgment, in the name of any other person not privy or consenting to the same in violation of 18 U.S. Code § 1506
IN A SCHEME TO OBTAIN 125 TRILLION DOLLARS WITHOUT DUE PROCESSS OF LAW(SEE BELOW)
Genocide,( genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity and ethnic cleansing. War crimes, Crimes against Humanity and Ethnic cleansing.
James and Sharon Bridgewater at all times mentioned were protected group of a race, religion and are perpetrators to physically destroy a national, ethnic, racial or religious group. deliberately targeted
- Killing members of the group;
- Causing serious bodily or mental harm to both Sharon and James Bridgewater members of the group;
- Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
- Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group(by making false intentional misrepresentatives adminsting a covid injection which permanent changes James DNA forever, and “cut” off blood-line extermination;
- Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
- For the purpose of paragraph 1:
- ‘Attack directed against any civilian population’ means a course of conduct involving the multiple commission of acts referred to in paragraph 1 against any civilian population, pursuant to or in furtherance of a State or organizational policy to commit such attack; crimes against humanity involve either large-scale violence in relation to the number of victims or its extension over a broad geographic area (widespread), or a methodical type of violence (systematic). This excludes random, accidental or isolated acts of violence. In addition, Article 7(2)(a) of the Rome Statute determines that crimes against humanity must be committed in furtherance of a State or organizational policy to commit an attack. The plan or policy does not need to be explicitly stipulated or formally adopted and can, therefore, be inferred from the totality of the circumstances.
- Murder;
- Extermination;
- Enslavement;
- Deportation or forcible transfer of population;
- Imprisonment;
- Torture;
- Grave forms of sexual violence;
- Persecution;
- Enforced disappearance of persons;
- The crime of apartheid;
- Other inhumane acts
such as hostage taking, acts of terrorism, chemical list all, illegal immigration
HOSTAGE TAKING(TERRORIST ACT) IN VIOLATION OF INTERANAL LAW – ON OR ABOUT NOV. 4, 2012 DURING THE BARAK H. OBAMA VS. MITT RODNEY PRESIDENTAL ELECTIONS(SEE THIS WEBSITE)
War crimes in non-international armed conflicts include: shotting high powered ammuniation into Sharon and James Residence on or about Nov. 4, 2016 DURING THE DONALD TRUMP VS. HILLARY CLINTON PRESIDENTAL ELECTIONS(SEE THIS WEBSITE)
- Serious violations of Article 3 common to the 1949 Geneva Conventions, such as:
o Violence to life and person, in particular murder of all kinds, mutilation, cruel treatment and torture of persons taking no active part in the hostilities, including members of armed forces who have laid down their arms and those placed hors de combat by sickness, wounds, detention, or any other cause against the sick, wounded and shipwrecked persons not taking part in hostilities, prisoners of war and other detainees, civilians and civilian objects. - Other serious violations of the laws and customs, such as:
o Intentionally directing attacks against the civilian population as such or against individual civilians not taking direct part in hostilities;
o Intentionally directing attacks against buildings dedicated to religion, education, art, science or charitable purposes, historic monuments, hospitals and places where the sick and wounded are collected, provided they are not military objectives.
By contrast to genocide and crimes against humanity, war crimes can be committed against a diversity of victims, either combatants or non-combatants, depending upon the type of crime. In international armed conflicts, victims include wounded and sick members of armed forces in the field and at sea, prisoners of war and civilians. In the case of non-international armed conflicts, protection is afforded to persons taking no active part in the hostilities, including members of armed forces who have laid down their arms and those placed ‘hors de combat’ by sickness, wounds, or detention. In both types of conflicts protection is also afforded to medical and religious personnel, humanitarian workers and civil defense staff.
ICC PRO
CRIMES OF AGRESSION
https://www.cnn.com/2022/02/10/americas/canada-trucker-protests-covid-thursday/index.html
“crime of aggression” means the planning, preparation, initiation or execution, by a person in a position effectively to exercise control over or to direct the political or military action of a State, of an act of aggression which, by its character, gravity and scale, constitutes a manifest violation of the Charter of the United Nations.
2. For the purpose of paragraph 1, “act of aggression” means the use of armed force by a State against the sovereignty, territorial integrity or political independence of another State, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Charter of the United Nations. Any of the following acts, regardless of a declaration of war, shall, in accordance with United Nations General Assembly resolution 3314 (XXIX) of 14 December 1974, qualify as an act of aggression:
(a) The invasion or attack by the armed forces of a State of the territory of another State, or any military occupation, however temporary, resulting from such invasion or attack, or any annexation by the use of force of the territory of another State or part thereof;
(b) Bombardment by the armed forces of a State against the territory of another State or the use of any weapons by a State against the territory of another State;
(c) The blockade of the ports or coasts of a State by the armed forces of another State;
(d) An attack by the armed forces of a State on the land, sea or air forces, or marine and air fleets of another State;
(e) The use of armed forces of one State which are within the territory of another State with the agreement of the receiving State, in contravention of the conditions provided for in the agreement or any extension of their presence in such territory beyond the termination of the agreement;
(f) The action of a State in allowing its territory, which it has placed at the disposal of another State, to be used by that other State for perpetrating an act of aggression against a third State;
(g) The sending by or on behalf of a State of armed bands, groups, irregulars or mercenaries, which carry out acts of armed force against another State of such gravity as to amount to the acts listed above, or its substantial involvement therein.
(SEE BELOW)
KAMALA HARRIS(AND PREDECESSORS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO BIDEN TERM), ET AL PUBLIC OFFICIALS ACTING IN THEIR INDIVIDUAL CAPACITIES UNDER THE COLOR OF LAW WITH FOREIGN OFFICIALS TO DEFRAUD “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL,” JUDGMENT CREDITOR IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 371(THE “50 STATES” EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENRAL AND/OR RELATOR VS. MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL-JACK SMITH SPECIAL PROSECUTOR IN THE JAN. 6, 2021 CAPITOL ATTACKS – DECLARATORY JUDGMENT & BINDING ADJUDICATION THAT ESTABLISHES THE RIGHTS AND OTHER LEGAL RELATIONS OF THE “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR VS. MERRICK GARLAND AND/OR JACK SMITH SPECIAL PROSECUTOR, ILLEGALLY, UNLAWFULLY APPOINTED BY GARLAND “CRIMINAL CLASS REPRESENTATIVE” declaratory judgment is a binding adjudication that establis
, TRIAL, JUDGMENT, CRIMINAL SENTENCE, EXTRADICITION OF FORIGEN OFF) & INCLUDES CRIME VICTIMS COMPENSATION FOR ALL RECIPIENTS OF ONE OR MORE OF “EXPERMINENTAL” COV-19 INJECTIONS(S), RECEIPIENTS OF THE COVID NASAL SWAB TEST & INJURIES AND DAMAGES TO “ALL” VICTIMS OF “COVID-19 PLANDEMIC RELATED AND NOTICE OF “INTERNATIONAL ANTI-SUIT INJUNCTION AND/OR INJUNCTION”!!
AFFIDIVANT & NOTICE AND ADJUDICATION DECLARATORY JUDGMENT – TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER & PERMANENT “INTERNATIONAL INJUNCTION
” ENTITLED IN RE: “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR VS. JOE BIDEN IN HIS “DEFACTO” CAPACITY AS PRESIDENT[AND PREDECESSORS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUNING THRU TO PRESENT PINCLUDING BUT NOT L INJUNTION ENJOINING JOE BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS, MERRICK GARLAND, ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, ALL PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES, ALL TECH. COMPANIES, ALL “INTENTIONAL HEADS OF STATE & FORFEIGN OFFICIALS” ET AL (GOD IN HEAVEN GRANTS TWO WITNESSES THE POWER TO PROSECUTE AND ENJOIN ALL “HEADS OF STATE””LITERALLY” – SEE BELOW AUTHORITY)RESTRAINING & ENJOINING ALL LAWS, POLICIES, PRACTICES AND ACTIONS, MISRPESENTATIONS ABOUT THE “COV-19 INJECTION/INFECTION/PLANDEMIC” ENJOINING AND RESTRAINING JOE BIDEN & KAMALA HARRIS[AND PREDECESSORS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO BIDEN’S TERM)ET AL IN THEIR DEFACTO OFFICIAL CAPACITIES FROM GRANTING CHINA SOVERIGNTY OVER THE U.S.A. AND ENJOINING CHINA ET AL FROM CONSPIRING TO DEFRAUDING THE U.S.A. IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 371 & “INTERNATIONAL INJUNCTION AGAINST AND FROM CONSPIRING TO “GRANT CHINA” U.S. SOVERIGNTY(TREASON)
DESTROYING THE U.S.A.(SUCH AS THE JAN. 6, 2021 CAPITOL ATTACKS)AND EXPLOITING AND DEFRAUDED TWO WITNESSES(SHARON AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER – COMMITTING ACTS OF GENOCIDE, WAR CRIMES, CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY AND ENGAGING IN A PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY(& ENJOINS AND RESTRAIN JOE BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS, MERRICK GARLAND FROM ILLEGALLY, UNLAWFULLY FROM MY NAME IN “ANY” U.S. SUPREM COURT, D.C. COURT OF APPEALS OR DISTRICT USING SHARON BRIDGEWATER AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER NAME IN ANY U.S. SUPREME COURT, FEDERAL COURT ETC. WITHOUT MY CONSENT, RESTRAIN AND ENJOIN MERRICK GARLAND, JOE BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS FROM CONSPIR IN IN CRIMINAL JURISDICTION AS FOLLOWS:
AND INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM, CONSPIRACY AND VIOLATION OF THE NUREMBERG CODE, DECLARATORY JUDGMENT THAT ALL VIOLATED THE NUREMBERG CODE BY FRAUD, DECEIT, TRICK JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER AND/OR S. BRIDGEWATER)
(HUNDREDS AND/OR THOUSANDS OF LAWYERS AND/OR DOCTORS HAVE STARTED CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE PERPETRATORS FOR “BILLIONS” OF VIOLATIONS OF THE NUREMBERG CODE FOR EXPERIMENTAL COVID INJECTION “DEATH” JAB THAT: 1)CHANGE MEN AND WOMEN DNA AND/OR GENES, 2)PATENT MEN AND WOMEN FOR ENSLAVMENT AND “GLOBAL ELITE” OWNERSHIP, 3) THAT CONCEALED KNOWN FACTS FROM HUMANITY” AND THE TWO WITNESSES THEY WERE UNDER A DUTY TO DISCLOSE PUT DEFENSE ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECT AGENCY(DARPHA) BIOWEAPON HYDROGELS NANO TECHNOLOGIES AND/OR IMPLANTABLE NANOTECHNOLOGY IN “THE TWO WITNESSES AND/OR HUMANITY” VIA THE “RAZORBLADE COVID-19 INJECTION DEATH JAB(SEE THIS WEBSITE)” WITH FRAUD, FORCE AND/OR COERCION WITHOUT THE CONSENT AND WHICH HAVE KILLED MILLIONS(AND WILL KILL BILLIONS IN THE FUTURE)INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO BABY FORMULAS ,BUT HAVE BEEN UNSUCCESSFUL TO IM https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuremberg_CodeAND ATTEMPTED TO FOR INSTANCE DR. ROBERT FUELLMICH, AND COUNTLESS OTHERS HAVE STARTED CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE “INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL RACKET” BUT ARE UNABLE TO JUDGE AND/OR SENTENCE(AND/OR “JAIL”) THE PERPATRATORS BECAUSE THEY LACK STANDING – SEE BELOW FOR DEFINTION OF STANDING )
– SEE BELOW AFFIDIVANT AND INJUNCTION WRIT VIA CERTIFIED MAIL ON JAN. 6, 2023
OVERT- CRIMINAL ACT OF “DEFACTO” U.S. PRESIDENT BIDEN!! ONLY WHEN “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR WAS TYPING(BIDEN AND CO-CONSPIRATORS RECEIVED NOTICE VIA ILLEGAL INTERNET SPYING ON THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR INJUNCTION – SEE BELOW) AND/OR SENT A”CERTIFIED MAIL ON THE JAN. 6, 2021 ANNIVERSARY” AND ARREST WARRANTS IN REM FOR JOE BIDEN Knowingly employed by conducted or participated in enterprise through pattern of racketeering and/or for RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY(HARBORING ILLEGAL IMMIGATES -In 1996, Congress expanded RICO[SEE BELOW FOR DEFINTION] by adding violations listed in the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). These additions made RICO a new and very strong tool for private parties to use against persons and companies that profit by violating U.S. immigration law. Pursuant to these RICO provisions, violations of certain INA provisions meet the definition of racketeering activity, also known as “predicate offenses,” “for the purpose of financial gain.”) SEE BELOW – BIDEN MAKES A FIRST VISIT TO U.S. BORDER FOR THE FIRST TIME – RECEIVED AN INJUNCTION
OVERT ACT – STEPPING DOWN AND HIDING BEFORE ARRESTED!! – Dr. David A. Kessler
NOTICES -DEFAULTS , FORFEITURE PURSUANT TO THE RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATION ACT
AFFIDIVANT & COMMON LAW NOTICE OF “COMMON LAW” OPEN COURT PROCEEDING PURSUANT TO ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME CLAIMS –“RETROACTIVE INTERVENTION AS A MATTER OF RIGHT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE(24A) RELATED KNOWN AND UNKNOWN U.S. SUPREME COURT CASES, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS CASES, FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT CASES, STATE COURT CASES ENTITLED SHARON BRIDGEWATER OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO DISMISSED CASE ENTITLED SHARON BRIDGEWATER VS. “HAYES VALLEY LIMITED PARTNERHIP ET AL IN THE SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA SUPERIOR[STATE COURT] CASE # CGC-08-478207 AND IN ALL DISMISSED CASES ENTITLED SHARON BRIDGEWATER VS. “THE U.S.A./”PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP CASES FROM AUGUST 2008 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT AND/OR FROM JAN. 1, 1993 VIA”THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR
AND CONTINUING THRU PRESENT”) OPEN “PUBLIC” COURT PROCEEDING AS OTHER NOTICE(S) AS FOLLOWS:
AFFIDIVANT AND INTERVENTION AS “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR A MATTER OF RIGHT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE CIVIL PROCEDURE 24A(THIS IS TIMELY, THE “50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR” HAVE AN UNCONDICTIONAL RIGHT TO INTERVENE BY A FEDERAL STATUTE – THE RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATION ACT(RICO), AND CLAIMS AN INTEREST RELATING TO THE PROPERTY AND/OR TRANACTION THAT IS THE SUJECT OF THIS ACTION, AND IS SO SITUATED THAT DISPOSING OF THE ACTION MAY AS A PRACTICIAL MATTER IMPAIR OR IMPEDE “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARRON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR ABILITY TO PROTECT ITS INTEREST UNLESS EXISTIG PARTIES(BOTH SHARON AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER)ADEQUATELY REPRESENT THAT INTEREST.
THE UNDERSIGNED SHARRON BRIDGEWATER BEING DULY SWORN DISPOSES AND SAYS AS FOLLOWS:
“THE 50 STATES EX REL SHAORN BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR Beginning on or about Jan. 1, 1993 and continuing thru the filing of this AFFIDIVANT within the District of Columbia and else in the US and/or “INTERNATIONALLY” Joe Biden in his “defacto” official capacity as President(and Predecessors from Jan. 1, 1993 and those operating under his direction Kamala Harris, Merrick Garland, all U.S. Supreme Court Justice, and continuing thru to present, did unlawfully, willfully and knowingly, intentionally combined, conspire together and with each other(and foreign Officials Heads of States), came to the meeting of the minds, entered into an unlawful agreement and/or came to a mutual understanding to accomplish a common and unlawful plan, namely to violate international law, money laundering, acts of Terrorism, list biological warfare on humanity and/or the two witnessesconspired to defraud the USA and/or the two witnesses engage in a “pattern of racketeering activity” discriminate, commit genocide, war crimes, violations of the Numerberg code, conceal known fact, trick to inject the COV-19 injection to _____________________________nano tech, _transhumanism, Military Grade weapon to control thoughts, memory, enslave commit_list predicate acts(violate a, b,c) and knowingly and willfully became a member of such conspiracy and futher, at the time, joined such conspiracy, he or she or they did so with the specific intent either to personally engage in at least two incidents of racketeering, as alleged in the Information,______________________ or he or she or they specifically intended to otherwise participate in the affairs of the “enterprise” with the knowledge and intent that other members of the conspiracy would engage in at least two incidents of racketeering, ______________________as alleged in the Information, as part of a “pattern of racketeering act or became a member without full knowledge of of all of the details of the unlawful scheme but has an understanding of the unlawful nature of a plan and knowingly and willfully joins in that plan on one occasion, and played a minor part. In the unlawful scheme.From on or about 2006 to the present, in Washington, D.C., Fairfax County, Virginia, in the Eastern District of Virginia, and elsewhere in Virginia, Denver, Colorado, New York City, N.Y. and, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Defendants o-conspirators for private gain and outside of their authority did unlawfully and knowingly conspire with each other and with others to devise and participate in a scheme to defraud the United States and the people of the United States of the honest services of Jane and John Does pursuant to their oaths of office, in furtherance of which in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§1341,1343, and 1346, by the use of interstate mails and interstate wire communications as a “step” in the scheme to deprive Sharon Bridgewater of the intangible right of the honest services of judges to conduct impartial judicial review in both Federal and State Judicial Branch as mandated by the Void Order Doctrine under Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch 137 (1803), andPennoyer v. Neff, 95 US 714 (1877), thereby depriving undersign counsel of his right to Jury trial, substantive and procedural to due process under Selling v. Redford, 243 U.S. 46 (1917), and Theard v. United States, 354 U.S. 278 (1957), to give reciprocal effect to the VSBDB void order despite the unrefuted evidence in the record that the VSBDB issued the order in violation of violation of Art. VI, § 1, § 5, and § 7 of the Virginia Constitution, in violation of its limited administrative authority under Va. Code §§ 54.1-3910, 3915, and 3935, and in violation of Va. Code §§ 18.2-481(5), 2-482, 499, by the VSBDB and Virginia Courts committing treason and misprision of a felony by “[r]esisting the execution of the laws under color of [their] authority as follows:
INTERVENTION EXH.’S A, B, C…….ADJUDIFICATION AND CONSOLIDATE RELATED CASES ETITLED SHARON AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER VS. HAYES VALLEY & THE STATE OF MICHIGAN VS. SHARON AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER(CRIMINAL CASES ALL DISMISSED AGAINST SHARON AND JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER)
NOTICE OF INTERNVENTION PURSUANT TO(24A) FRCP AND/OR COMMON LAW REMEI incorporates AS:
FORFEITURE OF ALL PROPERTY TANGILBE AND INTANGLE PURSUANT TO RICO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1963(D) MONEY LAUNDERING, HARBORING ILLEGAL IMMIGRATES, BIOWEA TERROISM
U.S.A. “RACKET-ILLEGAL ENTERPRISE SUCH AS MILITARY PERSONNEL, U.S. CITIZENS ETC. ALL HAVE BEEN DENIED AND/OR DEPRIVED THEIR FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHT(AND/OR ILLEGAL CENSORSHIP(VIA A CONSPIRACY UNDER THE COLOR OF “THE 50 STATES LAW” BY A PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP), DENIED COURT ACCESS
(BY ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT JUDGES, “MOST IF NOT ALL APPELLANT COURT JUDGES IN THE 50 STATES, MOST IF NOT ALL U.S. FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT JUDGES IN THE 50 STATES, MOST IF NOT ALL STATE COURT JUDGES IN THE 50 STATES, MOST IF NOT ALL ADMINSTRATIVE COURT JUDGES IN THE 50 STATES & JOINT PARTICIPATION WITH LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES(OPERATING DIRECTLY UNDER BIDEN AND/OR MERRICK GARLAND VIA CHAIN OF COMMAND AND RANK”) AND COMPLAINTS DISMISSED JUST LIKE “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR IN EVERY, DISTRICT COURT, APPEALLANT COURT TO FREE SPEECH AND ARE WITNESSES AND VICTIMS OF U.S. GOVENRMENT HARRASSMENT, BREAKING IN ENTERING, MALICIOUS PROSECUTION (JUST LIKE BRIDGEWATER – SEE YOUTUBE CHANNEL TESTIFY TO THE DNA COVID INJECTION ONE WITNESS AS AND COMPLAINTS DISMISSED FOLLOWS:
SEE THE ABOVE AND BELOW AFFIDIVANT OF “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AD/OR RELATOR!
https://www.thefinalexodus.com/in-1993-senator-biden-hurt-the-witnesses
RUSSIA’S V. PUTIN ET AL TO INTERFER WITH INTERSTATE & FOREIGN COMMERCE BY THREAT, VIOLENCE, OBSTRUCTION, DELAYS, ROBBERY EXTORTION & CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT PHYSICAL VIOLENCE(“WITHIN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA” AND ELSEWHERE IN THE U.S. ) IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C.§1951 & IN FURTHERANCE OF A PLAN TO DEFRAUD THE U.S.A. AND/OR THE TWO WITNESSES BOTH SHARON BRIDGEWATER AND JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER IN VIOLATION OF 30 R18 U.S.C.§ 371, LAUNDER MONEY IN VIOLATION OF ON OR MORE 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(1)(B), 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(2)(A), 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(2)(B), 18 U.S.C. § 1957, 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h), 18 U.S.C. § 1959, HARBOR AND ENCOURAGE ILLEGAL ALIENS TO ENTER THE U.S.A. IN VIOLATION OF ONE OR MORE ONE OR MORE Title 8, U.S.C. § 1324(a) 1324(a)(1)(i)-1324(a)(3)(v) 1324(a)(2) 1324(a)(3).Alien Smuggling IN VIOLATION OF 1324(a)(1)(A)(i)(a)(1)(A)(ii), HARBORING & ATTEMPTING TO CONCEAL ALIENS IN VIOLATION OF 1324(a)(1)(A)(iii)ENCOURING/INDUCING ALIENS TO ENTER THE U.S.A. IN VIOLATION OF 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv) CONSPIRACY/AIDING OR ABETTING IN VIOLATION OF 1324(a)(1), DOMESTIC TERRORISM & ELECTION FRAUD(A)FOR FINANCIAL GAIN.S S. BRIDGEWATER( HUMAN LIFE)
THAT ARE IN VIOLATION OF THE LAW OF THE U.S. AND/OR INTERNATIONAL LAW, WHICH ARE INTENDED TO INTIMIDATE, COERCE(THE TWO WITNESSES & HUMANITY[MEMBERS OF A CIVILIAN POPULATION)& TO INFLUENCE THE POLICY OF THE GOVERNMENT BY INTIMIDATION OR COERCION & TO AFFECT THE CONDUCT OF OF “THE GLOBAL GOVERNMENT” BY MASS DESTRUCTION, 18 U.S. Code § 2331 -“national of the United States” has the meaning given such term in section 101(a)(22) of the Immigration and Nationality Act;
attempted use, or threated use of physical force against the person of another; or (2) extortion, involves use of explosives, or otherwise involves conduct that presents a serious potential risk of physical injury to another. All maintained a________committed offenses as part of a pattern of cr
NOTICE OF“RETROACTIVE INTERVENTION OF “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR(JUDGE, PROSECUTOR, CLERK, ETC.-SEE BELOW)” IN ALL DISMISSED CASE ENTITLED SHARON BRIDGEWATER VS. “HAYES VALLEY LIMITED PARTNERHIP ET AL IN THE SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA SUPERIOR[STATE COURT] CASE # CGC-08-478207 AND IN ALL DISMISSED CASES ENTITLED SHARON BRIDGEWATER VS. “THE U.S.A./”PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP CASES FROM AUGUST 2008 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT AND/OR FROM JAN. 1, 1993
CERTIFICATION HERE
Whenever an action has been commenced in any court of the United States seeking relief from the denial of equal protection of the laws under the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution on account of race, color, religion, sex or national origin, the Attorney General for or in the name of the United States may intervene in such action upon timely application if the Attorney General certifies that the case is of general public. importance. In such action the United States shall be entitled to the same relief as if it had instituted the action. (SEE ABOVE FORM – 2000D]
ONE OR MORE OTHER CRIMINAL STATUES JURISDICTION
28 U.S. Code § 1605A – Terrorism exception to the jurisdictional immunity of a foreign state
.ONE OR MORE OTHER CRIMINAL STATUES JURISDICTION
statutory authorities: 28 USC section 1331, 28 USC section 1367, . Moreover, this Court is an Article III court with e express authority to hear and adjucate any questions arising underthe constitution, Laws, and Treaties of the United States , including but not limited to the bill of rights, the Ninth amendment, the tenth amendment, and/or the eleventh amendment, and “ALL AMENDMENTS” OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION, THE international Convenant of Civil and Political rights and the Universal declaration of Human rights, with the reservations. The Supremancy clause of the Constitution of the United States of America, as lawfully amended(HEREINAFTER “FEDERAL CONSTITUTION”); and further this United States District Court for the District Court of Columbia, has original jurisdiction of the instant matters pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1964(c) (Civil RICO); Breach of fiduary duties, breach of international peace, “aiding and abetting,” criminal conspiracy, criminal human trafficking, illegal abortions, criminal human trafficking of body parts jurisdiction, money laundering, Extra- territoristial Jurisidiction, special maritime jurisdiction within the United States, 28 U.S.C. 2241 and 2242 (Habeas Corpus); 31 U.S.C. 3730(h) (Relief from retaliatory actions); 42 U.S.C. 1985(2) and 1985(3) (Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights); 42 U.S.C. 1986 (Action for neglect to prevent conspiracy); and, ancillary jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1651, asset freeze, temporary restraining order and to issue prerogative writs in the nature of quo warranto, and/or Rules 13(b), 13(d) and 81(a)(4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“FRCP”) ; mandamus juridistiction writ of prohibition, contempt of court in violation of national security, Federal Asset Forfeiture Statutes of 981(a)(1)(D) and 982(a)(6). Violations ..44. § 982(a)(7)., 18 USC 286, 287, Rule E. Actions in Rem and Quasi in Rem, quo warranto and habeas corpus.. This United States District Court for this District of Columbia has original jurisidiction matter pursuant fo 18 USC section 1964( a and/or c)(civil RICO); 28 USC 2241 and 2242(Habeas Corpus); 31 USC section 3730(h)(Relief from retaliatory actions); 42 USC section 1985(2) and 1985(3)(Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights); 42 USC section 1986(action for neglect to prevent conspiracy);, and ancillary jurisdiction pursuant to 28 USC 1651, to issue prerogative writs in the nature of quo warranto, in order to prevent the continued exerces of authority unlawfully asserted; see Johnson v. Manhattan, 289 U.S.C. 479(1933), and ryder v. United States infra. See also Rules 13(b), 13(d) and 81(a)(4) of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“FRCP”)and/or (i) 28 U.S.C. §1331, (ii) 28 U.S.C. §1343(a), and (iii) D.C. Code, Division II, Title 16, Chapter 35. re; quo warranto and habeas corpus. . Special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States for acts committed against the CLASS REPRESENTATIVE(AND REPRESENTATIVE OF PUBLIC INTEREST) and/or the class outside the jurisdiction of “states” with respect to offense(s) by and/or against the CLASS REPRESENTATIVE(AND REPRESENTATIVE OF PUBLIC INTEREST) “a national and/or citizen of the United States.” Diversity of Citizenship jurisdiction 1332,admirality and maritime jurisdiction, Quasi in rem jurirsidction, in rem juridisction, forfeiture of assets jurisdiction, . 18 USCS § 1531(b), default judgment in rem jurisidiction, 42 usc section 1985, 1983, 1986, 1982, 1981- 18[242/241] anti-trust/racketeering jurisidiction, violation of international laws and treaties This District Court have admrallity and martime jurisidiction statin a maritme claim with the meanin of Rule 9(h) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Supplemental Admirality Rule E, C and/or G as hereinafter more fully appears This court has jurisdiction pursuant to one or more of the following: (i) 28 U.S.C. §1331; (ii) 28 U.S.C. §1343(a); (iii) 28 U.S.C. §2201 and §2202; (iv) 42 U.S.C. §1983; (v) D.C. Code, Division II, Title 16, Chapter 35.Obama, Lynch and other co-conspirator who , unlawfuly, upurps, intrudes Public Office, and/or 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)(c) (Civil RICO); U.S.C. 2241 and 2242 or all habeas statue jurisiction(Habeas Corpus); Mandumus, Writof Prohibition jurisdiction, and pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1651, ) and 81(a)(4) of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“FRCP”)and/or (i) 28 U.S.C. §1331, (ii) 28 U.S.C. §1343(a), and (iii) D.C. Code, Division II, Title 16, Chapter 35. re; quo warranto and habeas corpus 2254, §1956(a)(2)(B), 18 U.S.C. 1957;18 U.S.C. ‘ 2241(b)(2),18 U.S.C. ‘ 2242 (state court) . Impeachment jurisdiction, Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA) [interstate/which broadly defines a “class action” as “any civil action filed under rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or similar State statute or rule of judicial procedure authorizing an action to be brought by 1 or more representative persons as a class action.” Id. §1332(d)(1)(B). The class exceeds 100 members and upon information and belief the class exceeds one billion persons.(international and/or national class). The controversy exceeds the sum or value of $5,000,000 and the parties are minimally diverse pursuant to §1332(d)(2): A citizen of a state different from any defendant.A foreign state or a citizen or subject of a foreign state and any defendant is a citizen of a state. A citizen of a state and any defendant is a foreign state or a citizen or subject of a foreign state.28 U..C. § 1332(d)(2)(A)-(C) as between one-third and two-thirds of the class members and the Class Plaintiffs Representative are defendants are citizens of different state, and a district court and the district court of Columbia shuld exercise jurisdiction” where more than two-thirds of the class members and a defendant are citizens of the forum state. Venue further is met via federal false claims act __________, the Federal Rackeeteered Influenced and Corrupt Organization act(violations of the Sherman Act, civil rights violations, human rights violations, violations of international treaties and laws(Genova, Hague )
COMPLETE DIVERSITY EXIST BETWEEN MERRICK GARLAND CLASS REPRESENTATIVE(AND REPRESENTATIVE OF PUBLIC INTEREST) PLAINTIFF AND SHARON BRIDGEWATER 1332 complete diversity between Lynch and class defendant and/or respondant.
- Special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States for acts committed against the CLASS REPRESENTATIVE(AND REPRESENTATIVE OF PUBLIC INTEREST) and/or the class outside the jurisdiction of “states” with respect to offense(s) by and/or against the CLASS REPRESENTATIVE(AND REPRESENTATIVE OF PUBLIC INTEREST) “a national and/or citizen of the United States.” FRCP rule 23 which is brought by 1 or more representative persons “THE United States ex rel Sharon Bridgewater private attorney general and qui tam relator on behalf of herself and others similarly situated. The class exceeds 200 members. The controversy exceeds the sum or value of $5,000,000 and the parties are minimally diverse pursuant to §1332(d)(2): This court has jurisdiction and authority to hear questions arising under the Constitution, Laws, and Treaties of the United States, including but not limited to the First Amendment, Fourth Amendment, Sixth Amendment, Eighth Amendment, Ninth Amendment, Tenth Amendment, Thirteenth Amendment, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The judicial power shall extend to all cases, in law and equity, arising under this Constitution, the laws of the United States, and treaties made, or which shall be made, under their authority;–to all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls;–to all cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction;–to controversies to which the United States shall be a party;–to controversies between two or more states;–between a state and citizens of another state;–between citizens of different states;–between citizens of the same state claiming lands under grants of different states, and between a state, or the citizens thereof, and foreign states, citizens or subjects. To this affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, and those in which a state shall be party, the Supreme Court shall have original jurisdiction. In all the other cases before mentioned, the Supreme Court shall have appellate jurisdiction, both as to law and fact, with such exceptions, and under such regulations as the Congress shall make. This court also has jurisdiction pursuant to one or more crimes Arson or Attempted Arson (18 U.S.C. § 81). . . . . . .Conspiracy to Commit Arson
(
- 9(H) , TREASON, SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY, ADVOCATING TO OVERTHROW OUR CONSTITUTIONAL FORM OF GOVERNMENT , SLAVERY AND PEONAGE, TORTURE, SELLING ORGANS AND HUMAN BODY PARTS FOR PROFIT, SEXUAL EXPLOITATIONJ, PROSTITUTION OF MINORS AND ADULTS, concurrent jurisdiction with International Criminal Court
his is a complex civil action for RICO remedies authorized by the federal statutes at 18 U.S.C. 1961 et seq.; for declaratory and injunctive relief; for actual, consequential and exemplary damages; and for all other relief which this honorable Superior Court deems just and proper under all circumstances which have occasioned this Initial COMPLAINT. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 1964(a) and (c) (“Civil RICO”). The primary cause of this action is a widespread criminal enterprise engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity across International, Federal and/or State lines, and a conspiracy to engage in racketeering activity involving numerous RICO predicate acts during the past ten (10)-(20) calendar years. The predicate acts alleged here cluster around obstruction of justice, obstruction of congressional investigation, 18 U.S.C. 1512, Obstruction by Violence in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1512(a) Obstruction by Intimidation, Threats, Persuasion, or Deception in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1512(b) Obstruction by Destruction of Evidence in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1512(c), Obstruction by Harassment in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1512(d) , Obstructing Federal Courts in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1503, Interfering with Jurors or Judicial Officials in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1503, Obstructing Congressional or Administrative Proceedings in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1505, Retaliating Against Federal Witnesses in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1513, Conspiracy to Obstruct in violation of 18 U.S.C. 371), Conspiracy to Defraud, Contempt of Court, Criminal Contempt, Civil Contempt, Contempt of Congress, Obstruction of Justice by Bribery, Bribery of Jurors, Public Officers and Witnesses in violation of 18 U.S.C. 201, Obstruction by Mail or Wire Fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1341, 1343, 1346, Obstruction by Extortion Under Color of Official Right in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1951, Obstruction of Investigations by Bribery in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1510(a), Obstruction of Justice by Destruction of Evidence,Obstruction of Investigations by Destruction of Evidence in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1519, Destruction of Corporate Audit Records in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1520, Destruction of Property to Prevent Seizure in violation of 18 U.S.C. 2232(a), Obstruction of Justice by Deception, Perjury in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1623 and/or 18 U.S.C. 1621 and False Statements in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1001. See 18 U.S.C. §§1341 , 1344, 1346, 2319, 2320,2315, 1503, 1510, 1511 (AND A HOST OF OTHER CRIMES AS DEFINED IN 18 USC SECTION 1961 -et seq..) peonage and slavery[OBSTRUCTION RICO PROHIBITED ACTS – and human rights violations, money laundering, control substance, trafficking weapons in violation of international law, trafficking in human body parts and/or organs, sexual exploitation, illegal monopolopy in Real Estate Transactions, sale of securities and/or fraud , tampering with and retaliation against a qualified Federal Witness, interstate transportation of stolen property, tampering with and retaliation against a qualified Federal Witness, obstruction of justice, obstruction of congressional investigation, obstruction of criminal investigations, slavery, . wire fraud, mail fraud and bank fraud, peonage and slavery, war crimes, torture, illegal immigration(aiding and abetting illegal immigrates “for profit,”) and a host of other international crimes. See one or more 18 U.S.C. §§ §§ 1341 and 1344, 2319, 2320, 1512, 1513, 2315, 1503, 1505, 1510, 1511 and 1324. The extent of the “international rico gang – Rackeeteering across international and/or foreign boundries are best illistrated and/or is shown as follows:
JOE BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS AND DONALD TRUMP CONSPIRACY AS FOLLOWS – THE TWO WITNESSES AND U.S. POPULATION ARE PEOPLE
AUTHORITY AND LAW ALSO SEE ADDITITIONAL LAW – CLICK HERE-
https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/content/rico-act.html
THE U.S.A. WAIVES SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY FOR MARITIME CLAIMS AGAINST THE U.S.A.
NO IMMMUNITY FOR U.S. PRESIDENT FROM JAN. 1, 1993 & IT IS WAIVED VIA ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME LAW!! ALL HAVE CONSENTED TO BE SUED IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS U.S. PRESIDENT(PER ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME LAW)!!
Barak H. Obama and/or Eric Holder Jr. (their predescors from 1993 thru present) et al “Public Officials” the Plaintiff sue individually and sues and in their official capacities with respect to writ of mandamus , writ of prohibition etc. Plaintiff further sues foreign officials in their official and/or individual capacity. Barak Obama(2008- ), George W. Bush (2001- 2008), William Bill Clinton( 1993-2001), George H. W. Bush (1989-1993) according to the context, the terms“Bush I Administration, Bush II Administration,” “Clinton Administration,” and “Obama Adminstration” denote, respectively, the presidential terms of office of and or, collectively, to the senior officials who comprised, from time to time, the policy-making governmental and political apparatus of each of those administrations. authority, plaintiff sues each of said defendants, as the acts complained of were not within the scope of such defendants’ official duties, but were crimes and unlawful acts outside the scope of such duties and such acts and omissions were done under color of Federal and/or State law and/or official right.class plaintiff seeks recovery for the acts and omissions of each such defendant individually and from his or her personal assets, not against the government body that is (or was) such defendant’s employer at the time of the acts complained. On or about 1993 and continuing thru present, Plaintiff and/or Petitioner in this action, along with other Plaintiffs and/or Petitioner filed multiple civil or criminal complaints and/or lawsuits in the United States Supreme Court, Appealant Courts, US Federal District Court, State Court or small claims court throughout the “United States,” all cases have been dismissed. The obstruction has occurred in these court cases, in part by impersonation of Supreme Court Justices, Circuit Court Judges, Appelant Court Judges, Article III federal judges, State Court Judges, Commissioners, etc. “within the contientinal of the 50 States” in violation of 18 U.S.C. 912 (a federal felony). As such, federal officers, State or local judicial officers including but not limited to Judge Lambert in this US District Court of the District Court of Columbia are now among the probable causes that threaten further continuation of the severe economic hardship and other wrongs described above and the Plaintiffs the United States and/or the Class Plaintiff have no other adequate remedies at law. The Plaintiff, hereby makes a formal offer to prove, that the instant action must not be removed to any US Supremem Court Judges, or Appelant Court Judges because of demonstrable bias and prejudice among Judges, officers and employees of these courts, and the Class Plaintiffs and/or the United States have no other adequate remedies at law. All the Defendants, and each of them, did the acts and omissions hereinafter alleged in bad faith and with knowledge that their conduct violated well established and settled law. The federal government has waived sovereign immunity in this action under the Rackeeteered Influence and Corrupt Organition Act and/or the “Stripping dotrine”The United States, ex rel Sharon Bridgewater private attorney general and/or a “Representative of Public interest” et al have other adequate remedies at law. The U.S. Government via Admiralty and maritime law provide
Suits filed against state officials under the stripping doctrine permits a state official who used his or his or her position to act illegally to be sued in his or her individual capacity, and the government is immune from being sued through respondeat superior.
[3]Suits filed against state officials under the stripping doctrine permits a state official who used his or his or her position to act illegally to be sued in his or her individual capacity,
Circumstances from which the claim arises with such particularly that the Defendants or claimant will be able, without moving for a more definite statement
ARREST WARRANTS -CLICK HERE- ADJUDICATION/JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE FOR MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AND/OR INDIVIUDALLY HERE
VIOLATION OF THE THE TWO WITNESSES 1ST AMENDMENT RIGHT, THE RIGHT TO WORSHIP YESHUA/JESUS CHRIST, FORCED WORSHIP, DIGITAL DOLLARS, FRAUD, NUERO BRAIN IMPLANTS
TO ENSLAVE MND CONTROL VIA THE COV-19 VACCINE, AND DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES OUT OF ALL MONEY AND PROPERTY IN THE BANK. BIDEN EXECUTIVE ORDER
5G NETWORK, WEAPON OF MASS DESTRUCTION, NEURO WEAPONS AND MILITARY GRADE WEAPON AGAINST HUMANITY!!
FRAUD, DECEIT, COERCION, CHANGING OF DNA, BIOTERRORISM(COVID-19 MANDATE IS “HACKING THE HUMAN BODY AND BRAIN” TO ENFORCE, (COVID-19 MANDATE IS ACTUALLY – A NANOTECH MANDATE, TRANSHUMANISM, COVID FRAUD, TO CHANGE HUMAN DNA, CONTROL,
Declaratory Judgment Act(The declaratory Judgment act permits adjudifiation of an actual controversty between parties that is manifest or that is unaviable in the immediate future, an actual, ripe[INCLUDE ACTUAL LANGUAGE] controversy exist between the “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR” AND MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS “DEFACTO” for his actions of identity theft(illegal use of my name in the U.S. Court of Appeals, list all crimes 2and to “declare” the rights and legal relations of the parties to the controversy(JOE BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS, MERRICK GARLAND, DONALD TRUMP, ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, ALL; such declarations have the force and effect of a final judgment. This common law court has ripen, and ripe for adjudification. COMMON LAW REMEDIES AND PURSUANT TO THE RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATION ACT!
VS.
AFFIDIVANT OF SHARON BRIDGEWATER VIA “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER(AS PROSECUTOR FOR THE “50 STATES” PURSUANT TO RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATION ACT(RICO) VS. MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL(CRIMINAL CLASS REPRESENTATIVE AND JACK SMITH SPECIAL PROSECUTOR FOR JAN. 6. 2021(AND PREDECESSORS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRUTO HIS TERM) MERRICK GARLAND(JOE BIDEN, KAMAL HARRIS, ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, ET AL ARE RESPONSIBLE CAPITOL ATTACKS GUILTY OF 18 U.S. Code § 2383 – Rebellion or insurrection incapable of holding any office under the United States AS FOLLOWS:
a judicial determination as to the above controvery. A declaration that Joe Biden in his official capacity as Vice President entered into a conspiracy with Obama, immigration offense is guilty of Racketeering and illegally unlawful occupies upurps the office of the President the Donald Trump Executive Order A judicial declaration is necessary and appropriate at this time under the circumstances. The Unitedhas exhausted all available remedies and has not other adequate remedies at law without this court intervention and immediate declaratory and injunctive relief pursuant to Fed. R
CLICK HERE FOR AFFIDIVANT
ALL U.S. SURPREME COURT JUSTICES IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITIES, U.S. REPRESENTATIVES IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITIES, ALL SPECIAL PROSECUTORS APPOINTED BY U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL(FROM JAN.1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO JACK SMITH
CONTINUING CONSPIRACY 1-12-2023
Robert Hur as special counsel to oversee the review of classified documents found at President Biden’s office at the Penn Biden Center and at his Delaware home.
CERTIFIED MAIL SENT AGAIN TO MERRICK GARLAND AND ROBERT HUR
U..S PRESIDENT FROM 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT
HAD A MAINTAIN NATIONAL BORDER, LIST HERRE
EXH.’S AS FOLLOWS:
Declaratory Judgment Act(The declaratory Judgment act permits adjudifiation of an actual controversty between parties that is manifest or that is unaviable in the immediate future, an actual, ripe[INCLUDE ACTUAL LANGUAGE] controversy exist between the “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR” AND MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS “DEFACTO” for his actions of identity theft(illegal use of my name in the U.S. Court of Appeals, list all crimes 2and to “declare” the rights and legal relations of the parties to the controversy(JOE BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS, MERRICK GARLAND, DONALD TRUMP, ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, ALL; such declarations have the force and effect of a final judgment. This common law court has ripen, and ripe for adjudification. COMMON LAW REMEDIES AND PURSUANT TO THE RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATION ACT! THE RACKETEERED INFLUENCED, AND ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME LAW
THE CONTROVERSY BETWEEN JOE BIDEN IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AND/OR INDIVIDUALLY, MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AND/OR INDIVIDUALLY, DONALD TRUMP IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AND/OR INDIVIDUALLY, KAMALA HARRIS IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AND/OR INDIVIDUALLY, “ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITY AND/OR INDIVIDUALLY ET AL
The 50 States ex rel Sharon Bridgewater” private attorney general has a legally protectable stake and/or interest in the health, safety of myself, U.S. Citizens, Freedom, U.S. Constitutional and/or human rights and has a dispute that entitles her to bring this controversy before the court. The controvery that exist between Joe BidenDonald Trump in his official capacity as President and Sharon Bridgewater. list scheme to defraud, exploit, (see below TRO – permanent injunction against biden, U.S. Supreme Court Justice, special proseutor illegally using my name(documents “under seal”) in the U.S. Supreme Court and/or Court to obtain 125 Trillion, to enjoin Biden, harris from Conspiring with China to illegally enslave the two witnesses and/or U.S. Citizens without due process of law, and to defraud all U.s.Citizens out of all money and property via China/Biden and Rothchild Conspiracy and executive order “digital dollar(see below) running or holding the the office as the President in 2024 and/or Upurpingand other unlawful activity)
And that Donald Trump acts or omissions constitute illegal restraints in trade, and/or an illegally monopolopy and that the Appellant is fasley, maliciously imprisioned in violation of international/federal and/or state laws, and is entitled to immediate declaratory and/or injunctive relief. Controversy between the United States Supreme Court Justices, Merrick Garland, Dr. Faccui, Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Donald Trump and other via National Security, Putin and the COV-19 vaccine.
THE CONTROVERSY BETWEEN JOE BIDEN IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AND/OR INDIVIDUALLY, MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AND/OR INDIVIDUALLY, DONALD TRUMP IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AND/OR INDIVIDUALLY, KAMALA HARRIS IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AND/OR INDIVIDUALLY, “ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITY AND/OR INDIVIDUALLY ET AL
The 50 States ex rel Sharon Bridgewater” private attorney general has a legally protectable stake and/or interest and has a dispute that entitles her to bring this controversy before the court. The controvery that exist between JOE BIDEN Donald Trump in his official capacity as President and Sharon Bridgewater.
And that Donald Trump acts or omissions constitute illegal restraints in trade, and/or an illegally monopolopy and that the Appellant is fasley, maliciously imprisioned in violation of international/federal and/or state laws, and is entitled to immediate declaratory and/or injunctive relief. Controversy between the United States Supreme Court Justices, Merrick Garland, Dr. Faccui, Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Donald Trump and other via National Security, Putin and the COV-19 vaccine.
ON OR ABOUT JULY 9, 2013
COV-19 VACCINE MANDATES ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL WE ARE NOT THE GLOBAL ELITE PROPERTY AND VIOLATES US Supreme Court Strikes Down Gene Patents but Allows Patenting of Synthetic DNA THE COV-19 VACCINE IS PATENT, THEREFORE EVERY PERSON WHO RECEIVED THE COV-19 VACCINE NOW IS SOMEONE’S PROPERTY, IN ADDITION ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT JUDGES, MERRICK GARLAND THE CURRENT U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL(FORMER U.S. COURT OF APPEALS COURT JUDGE COMMITTED FRAUD) COMMITTED FRAUD, ISSUED VOID ORDERS WITHOUT JURISDICTION TO HEAR THE CASE IN AN ATTEMPT TO DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES OUT OF 125 TRILLION TO AID, HELP, ABET DONALD TRUMP, JOE BIDEN AND VAL
In a unanimous decision last month, the Supreme Court ruled that naturally occurring genes are not patentable. But, said the Court, cDNA, a man-made copy of the genetic messenger in cells, is patentable.
the Court also ruled that cDNA, an edited man-made copy of the gene, can be patented. Ruling that cDNA can be patented will have important consequences for research, including research to discover new disease treatments and create new genetic tests.
COV-19 VACCINES
complementary DNA (cDNA) is the enzyme reverse transcriptase. … Reverse transcriptase synthesizes a DNA strand complementary to an RNA are patentable making all who receive the COV-19 SOMEONE(THE GLOBAL ELITE-BILL GATES ET AL PROPERTY)
A reverse transcriptase (RT) is an enzyme used to generate complementary DNA (cDNA) from an RNA template, a process termed reverse transcription.
THOUSANDS, EVEN MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL IMMIGRATES ALLOWED IN THE U.S.A.(FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE TO INTERGRATE ALL IMMIGRATES & U.S. CITIZENS(TOGETHER)AND FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE(TO TELL THE PUBLIC IT’S IMPOSSIBLE TO KNOW “WHO’S WHO, & FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE TO FORCE/MANDATE VIA EXECUTIVE ORDER ALL TO GET THE COV-19 JAB, AND COMING INVISIBLE TATOO-TO IDENTIFY PEOPLE VIA “AN UNDERTHESKIN MARK
COV-19 VACCINE MANDATES ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL WE ARE NOT THE GLOBAL ELITE PROPERTY AND VIOLATES US Supreme Court Strikes Down Gene Patents but Allows Patenting of Synthetic DNA THE COV-19 VACCINE IS PATENT, THEREFORE EVERY PERSON WHO RECEIVED THE COV-19 VACCINE NOW IS SOMEONE’S PROPERTY, IN ADDITION ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT JUDGES, MERRICK GARLAND THE CURRENT U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL(FORMER U.S. COURT OF APPEALS COURT JUDGE COMMITTED FRAUD) COMMITTED FRAUD, ISSUED VOID ORDERS WITHOUT JURISDICTION TO HEAR THE CASE IN AN ATTEMPT TO DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES OUT OF 125 TRILLION TO AID, HELP, ABET DONALD TRUMP, JOE BIDEN AND VAL
In a unanimous decision last month, the Supreme Court ruled that naturally occurring genes are not patentable. But, said the Court, cDNA, a man-made copy of the genetic messenger in cells, is patentable.
the Court also ruled that cDNA, an edited man-made copy of the gene, can be patented. Ruling that cDNA can be patented will have important consequences for research, including research to discover new disease treatments and create new genetic tests.
COV-19 VACCINES
complementary DNA (cDNA) is the enzyme reverse transcriptase. … Reverse transcriptase synthesizes a DNA strand complementary to an RNA are patentable making all who receive the COV-19 SOMEONE(THE GLOBAL ELITE-BILL GATES ET AL PROPERTY)
A reverse transcriptase (RT) is an enzyme used to generate complementary DNA (cDNA) from an RNA template, a process termed reverse transcription.
THOUSANDS, EVEN MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL IMMIGRATES ALLOWED IN THE U.S.A.(FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE TO INTERGRATE ALL IMMIGRATES & U.S. CITIZENS(TOGETHER)AND FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE(TO TELL THE PUBLIC IT’S IMPOSSIBLE TO KNOW “WHO’S WHO, & FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE TO FORCE/MANDATE VIA EXECUTIVE ORDER ALL TO GET THE COV-19 JAB, AND COMING INVISIBLE TATOO-TO IDENTIFY PEOPLE VIA “AN UNDERTHESKIN MARK
HOMELESS, IMMIGRATES, UNEMPLOYED, REFUGEES “INTERGRATION” DELARE A PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY WORLD WIDE” VIA THE PANDEMIC AND USE FORCE SO ALL THE POPULATION INCLUDING THE TWO WITNESSES WILL RECEIVED NANOTECH COVID INJECITON
“THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR CLASS REPRESENTATIVE (“FOR THE 50 STATES AND/OR “WE THE
PEOPLE”)CLAIMANT – JUDGMENT -CREDITOR sues/claims from defendants
In order to prove a Rico violation the “Plaintiffs and/or Petitioners”
the crime[s] charged, each of which the government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that an enterprise existed, which can included single individual or a group of people informally associated together for the common purpose of engaging in a course of conduct which have a common purpose, a core of personnel who function as a continuing unit. Furthermore, the enterprise must continue to exist in substantially similar form throughout the period charged. This does not mean that the membership must remain exactly identical, but the enterprise must have a recognizable core that continues throughout the period charged.
The information alleges that the following enterprise existed: <describe the alleged enterprise>.
.
[<Insert if appropriate:> Although the state contends that this group of individuals was known as <insert alleged name of enterprise>, you need not determine that the individuals actually referred to themselves by that name in order to find that an enterprise existed.]
In summary, in order to determine that an enterprise existed, you must find beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was
Element 2 – Association with the enterprise
The second element is that the defendant was associated with or was employed by the enterprise.
[<Insert if appropriate:> When the enterprise is alleged to be the defendant acting as an individual, the association is self-evident. In this case, the state contends that the defendant is the enterprise.]
[<Insert if appropriate:> The state contends that the defendant was associated with an enterprise described as a group of individuals known as <insert alleged name of enterprise>.]
It is not required that the defendant have been associated with the enterprise for the entire time that the enterprise existed. It is required, however, that the state prove beyond a reasonable doubt that at some time during the period indicated in the information the defendant was associated with the enterprise.
The state must show that the defendant’s association with the enterprise was knowing — that is, made with the knowledge of the existence of the criminal enterprise through a general awareness of some of its purposes, activities and personnel. If you find that the state has proved beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was knowingly associated with the enterprise, then the second element is satisfied.
Element 3 – Pattern of racketeering activity
The third element is that the defendant wilfully engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity. “Racketeering activity” means to commit, to attempt to commit, to conspire to commit, or to intentionally aid, solicit, coerce or intimidate another person to commit any crime which, at the time of its commission, was a felony chargeable by indictment or information under the provisions of the general statutes then applicable. <Insert underlying crimes as appropriate.>2
A “pattern of racketeering activity” means engaging in at least two incidents of racketeering activity that have the same or similar purposes, results, participants, victims or methods of commission or otherwise are interrelated by distinguishing characteristics, including a nexus to the same enterprise, and are not isolated incidents, provided the latter or last of such incidents occurred after October 1, 1982, and within five years after a prior incident of racketeering activity.3
The incidents of racketeering activity charged are: <Insert underlying crimes as necessary and take judicial notice that they are felonies.>
The elements of each of these alleged incidents will be covered in a few minutes. You must be unanimous as to which incidents of racketeering activity have been proved beyond a reasonable doubt before you may find that the third element of CORA has been satisfied. In other words, there must be at least two specific incidents of racketeering activity that all of you believe were committed by the defendant in order to convict the defendant under CORA.
Difference between “enterprise” and “pattern of racketeering”
An enterprise, as used in the statute, is not the same thing as the pattern of racketeering activity. In order to convict, the state must prove both that there was an enterprise and that the enterprise’s affairs were conducted through a pattern of racketeering activity. The enterprise in this case is alleged to be (the defendant himself / a group of individuals who associated together for a common purpose of engaging in a course of conduct). A pattern of racketeering activity, on the other hand, is a series of criminal acts.
The existence of the enterprise is proved by evidence of an ongoing organization, formal or informal, with a common purpose and by evidence that various core personnel of the group functioned as a continuing unit.
The pattern of racketeering activity, on the other hand, is proved by evidence of a minimum of two incidents of racketeering which the participant(s) in the enterprise committed.
The proof used to establish those separate elements may be the same or overlapping — for example, if you find that an ongoing enterprise existed, the existence of this enterprise may help establish that the separate incidents of racketeering activity were part of a “pattern” of continuing criminal activity. Nevertheless, you should bear in mind that proof of an enterprise does not necessarily establish proof of a pattern of racketeering activity, and vice versa. The enterprise is a separate element which must be proved by the state.
Element 4 – Knowingly conducted or participated in enterprise through pattern of racketeering
The fourth element is that the defendant, by engaging in racketeering activities, knowingly conducted or participated in the enterprise. A person acts “knowingly” with respect to conduct or to a circumstance described by a statute defining an offense when he is aware that his conduct is of such nature or that such circumstance exists. <See Knowledge,
Incident <insert number> of racketeering activity
The (first / next) alleged incident of racketeering activity reads as follows: <Read incident of racketeering activity.>
The state alleges that the defendant (committed / attempted to commit / conspired to commit / intentionally aided, solicited, coerced or intimidated another person to commit) <identify underlying crime and refer to instruction on that crime and then present the facts as presented by the state and the defendant>.4
If you find that the state has proved the elements of <identify underlying crime> beyond a reasonable doubt, then you will find this incident of racketeering activity proved. If you do not find that the state has proved those elements beyond a reasonable doubt, then you would find that the racketeering act of <identify underlying crime> has not been proved.
<Repeat for each charged incident of racketeering activity.>
Again, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant engaged in at least two incidents of racketeering activity that have the same or similar purposes, results, participants, victims or methods of commission or otherwise are interrelated by the distinguishing characteristics, including a nexus to the same enterprise, and are not isolated incidents, provided the latter or last of such incidents occurred after October 1, 1982, and within five years after a prior incident of racketeering activity. Sharon Bridgewater via “The 50 States ex rel Sharon Bridgewater Private Attorney General will show and prove that both Sharon & James S. Bridgewater victim and Federal Witnesses with first hand knowledge and will show and prove to this “COMMON LAW OPEN COURT AND THE PUBLIC” that,by direct “evidence,” including but not limited the testimony of witnesses, documents and other things received as exhibits, and any facts to establish guilt. B victims of “continual victims of exploitation engaged in at least two incidents of racketeering activity that have the same or similar purposes, results, participants, victims or methods of commission or otherwise are interrelated by the distinguishing characteristics, including a nexus to the same enterprise, and are not isolated incidents, provided the latter or last of such incidents occurred after October 1, 1982, and within five years after a prior incident of racketeering activity, and which requires immediate adjudification
“COMMON LAW OPEN PUBLIC COURT” HAS JURISIDICTION VIA ADMIRALITY OR MARITIME CLAIM (CLASS ACTION CRIMINAL PROSECUTION)FOR THE PURPOSES OF Rule 14(c), 38(e), 82 and the Supplimental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Claim for declaratory and injunctive relief.(SEE Supplemental rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims( of one or more of the following Rule A, B, C, D, E, F, G) within the meaning o of Rule 9(h) with respect to one or more of the following “common law” remedies:
- Maritime time attachment and garnishment,
- Actions in rem
- Possessory, petitory, and partition actions,
- And
- Actions for exoneration from or limitation of liability
- Forfeiture arising from a federal statue(18 USC 985); RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY
“ADMIRALTY AND MARTIME LAW PERMITS “COMMON LAW REMEDIES WHEN NO ADEQUATE REMEDIES ARE AT LAW, DENIAL OF COURT ACCESS, DISMISSAL OF 50 OR MORE COMPLAINTS, SCHEMES TO DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES WIRE FRAThe property in dispute is within the jurisidiction of the district of Columbia, or will be during the pendency of this action. Pursuant Supplimental rule requires that a complaint state the circumstances from which the claim arises with such particularly that the Defendants or claimant will be able, without moving for a more definite statement, to commence an investigation of the facts Supplimental Rule for certain admirality and martime claims b(1), C(2) and/or other Supplimental rules require that the rem actions be instituted by means of a verified complaint. THE VERFIED COMPLAINT IS AS FOLLOWS:
________ TOP OF PAGE
THE DEFENDANTS RECEIVED SERVICE OF THE COMPLAINT, ANSWERED THE COMPLAINT(CONSPIRED WITH JUDGES – VEXIT. ORDER, ETC), REFUSE TO DEFEND OR OTHERWISE PLEAD AND IS IN DEFAULT!! ALL DISMISSED DENIED THE FOLLOWING BELOW COMPLAINT “BY OPERATION OF LAW” IS THE COMPLAINT, EXPLOITED THE TWO WITNESSES DEFRAUDED OUT OF MONEY AND PROPERTY FAKE LIST HERE
THIS CRIMINAL PROCEEDING IS BURIFICATED INTO LI JUDGMENT, SENTENCE, FORFEITURE OF ALL TANGIBLE AND INTANGIBLE PROPERTY, FORFEITURE OF OFFICE,
On or about Jan. 1, 1993 and continuing thru to Present, George H. Bush, William B. Clinton, George W. Bush, Nov. 2008, Obama before taking his oath of office, as President of the United States of America, “palmed his hand on the Holy Bible while swearing, “I, Barak H. Obama, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which “he” and added, “So help me God!” Article. II. – The Executive Branch Section 1 – states before he/she enter on the Execution of his Office, he/she the President shall take the following Oath or Affirmation:
“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of
the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the
Immigration and Nationality Act Offenses
Section 1961(1)(F), added by several amendments in 1996, includes as racketeering activity:
any act which is indictable under the Immigration and Nationality Act, i.e., section
274 (relating to bringing in and harboring certain aliens), section 277 (relating to
aiding or assisting certain aliens to enter the United States), or section 278 (relating
to importation of aliens for immoral purposes) if the act indictable under such section
of such Act was committed for the purpose of financial gain.
These violations are codified, respectively, at 8 U.S.C. §§ 1324, 1327 and 1328. See also discussion of ex post facto issues arising from such amendments in Section VI(F)(4) below.
Representative cases charging Immigration and Nationality Act offenses:
Williams v. Mohawk Indus., Inc., 411 F.3d 1252 (11th Cir. 2005), vacated on other
grounds, 547 U.S. 1075 (2006). AND TO OFFSET AND “UNDUE VIA DAMAGE CONTROL – OVERT ACT AS FOLLOWS: https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/supreme-court-title-42-vote-keeps-border-shut-asylum-seekers-biden-pol-rcna62932 – SEE BIDEN INVITE DRAG QUEEN TO WHITE HOUSE, LIST ‘Once-in-a-lifetime’ blizzard kills at least 27 in western New York & https://www.cnn.com/us/live-news/winter-storm-christmas-weather-forecast-12-24-2022/index.html FOR 2022 CHRISTMAS(SEE OTHER OVERT ACTS, DAMAGE CONTROL – DECLARATORY JUDGMENT, ADJUDICATION, AND “RETROACTIVE” SENTENCING OF JOE BIDEN FOR CONSPIRING WITH ONE OR MORE DONALD TRUMP, PUTIN, XI JINPING AND MERRICK GARLAND ET AL IS GUITY OF 18 U.S. Code § 2383 – Rebellion or insurrection “LACKED THE LEGAL CAPACITY TO ACT AS PRESIDENT – CONVICTED OF RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY, CONSPIRING WITH DONALD TRUMP Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
Obama Anemsty Program constitute aiding and/or assisting certain aliens to enter the United States in violation of one or more section 1324, 1327, and/or 1328 in further of Obama’s Program, Joe Biden(Obama’s extention)
Constitution of the United States.”
All of the above named Defendants are Public official and/or individual capacity are Federal/State or local employees, and/or an “Actor” under the color of Federal and/or State and/or local law and/or person that acted in joint participations in their Public official and/or individual capacity are Federal/State or local employees, and Actor under the color of Federal and/or State and/or local law and/or person with within the scope of his employment and/or apparent authority. Principle place of business Washington, District of Columbia and/or elsewhere in the United States with “official responsibility” and/or position of public trust, with duties and/or obligations and/or direct administrative or operating authority; intermediate and/or final, and/or “exercise alone or with others;” and/or “personally” and/or through “subordinates,” to approve or disapprove, direct action of the legal affairs of United States Government Federal/State/or local Government, and/or are persons that acted in joint participation with The are Federal, State or local “Actor” under the color of Fed./state or local law and their actions are the same Principle place of business in Washington, District of Columbia with “official responsibility” duties and/or obligations and/or direct administrative or operating authority; intermediate and/or final, and/or “exercise alone or with others;” and/or “personally” and/or through “subordinates,” to approve or disapprove, direct action of the legal affairs of United States Government of the United States Housing and Urban Development. Nature Trade of Commerce: USA Housing and/or Real Estate, Law Enforcement and/or Judicial Branch /or Dovanan is a “public official;” a person in a “position of public trust with official federal responsibilities, obligation and/or duties, and/or all took oath of office and/or were individuals who acted in joint participation with one another (and that as defined in that
This criminal case has been brought by the United States government. I will sometimes refer to the government as the prosecution as “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERLA AND/OR RELATOR The government(THE 50 STATES) is represented at this trial by an assistant United States attorney, [_________]. The defendant, [__________], is represented by [his/her]
The Plaintiff and/or Petitioners brings chares agains the Defendant Barak H. Obama, et al with violation of the Rackeeteereed Influenced and Corrupt Organization act for having intentionally, _______, HEALTH C, Treason, conspired to overthrow the US Government, conspired to defraud US Taxpayers, Consumers, depriving US Taxpayers, Consumers the intangle right to honest service, distribution of herion, cocaine, majuria, illegal gun traffic upursation of public office of the United States President, and multiple other crimes which a federal law, which is contained in under the 1st Count of this complaint. An Acutual contriversiy exist between Barak H. Obama(Eric Holder Jr. ), failed to do legal duties to prosecute “Banker” and other co-conspirator major fraud against the US A and the Plaintiff, faile to “global asset freeze” of forieInterest in documents, indictment. The Plaintiff in intervenes, Temporary restraining order, the rights of the the “50 States” Plaintiffs to books, documents, as private attorn
OVERT- CRIMINAL ACT OF “DEFACTO” U.S. PRESIDENT BIDEN!! ONLY WHEN “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR WAS TYPING(BIDEN AND CO-CONSPIRATORS RECEIVED NOTICE VIA ILLEGAL INTERNET SPYING ON THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR INJUNCTION – SEE BELOW) AND/OR SENT A”CERTIFIED MAIL ON THE JAN. 6, 2021 ANNIVERSARY” AND ARREST WARRANTS IN REM FOR JOE BIDEN Knowingly employed by conducted or participated in enterprise through pattern of racketeering and/or for RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY(HARBORING ILLEGAL IMMIGATES -In 1996, Congress expanded RICO[SEE BELOW FOR DEFINTION] by adding violations listed in the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). These additions made RICO a new and very strong tool for private parties to use against persons and companies that profit by violating U.S. immigration law. Pursuant to these RICO provisions, violations of certain INA provisions meet the definition of racketeering activity, also known as “predicate offenses,” “for the purpose of financial gain.”) SEE BELOW – BIDEN MAKES A FIRST VISIT TO U.S. BORDER FOR THE FIRST TIME – RECEIVED AN INJUNCTION
CONSPIRED UNDER THE COLOR OF LAW TO DESTROY AMERICA,VIA JAN COMMIT OFFENSES AGAINST THE TO discriminated against DEFRAUD THE U.S.A. & TWO WITNESSES IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 371conspire either to commit international crimes AGAINST THE TWO WITNESSES Geocide, violations of NUREMBERG CODE
multiple offense against the United States, abuse Power, exploit two socioecon minority business owners person employed by or associated with any enterprise engaged in, or the activities of which affect, interstate or foreign commerce, to conduct or participate, directly or indirectly, in the conduct of such enterprise’s affairs through a pattern of racketeering activity or collection of unlawful debt.or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, All the Defendants, knowingly, intentionally entered into a conspiracy discriminated, conspired under the color of law 18 U.S. Code § 241
.
KAMALA HARRIS IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY OR DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR SAN FRANSICO CALIFORNIA, SENTATOR, AMY VIVIAN Amy Vivian Coney Barrett, Ketanji Onyika Brown Jackson AND FOR KNOWINGLY FALSLEY assuming one or more office(s) as the U.S. President, Vice President, Supreme Court Justice, U.S. Attorney General(and for falsely swearing each other into office in violation of ___________________to further promote the objective of the “Racketeering Criminal Enterprize genocide” to defraud the two witnesses out of money and/or property without due process of law) or pretends to be an officer or employee acting under the authority of the United States or any department, agency or officer thereof, and acts as such, or in such pretended character demands or obtains money, paper, document, or thing of value FOR “ONE OR MORE OFFICES OF THE U.S. GOVERNMENT IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 912 AND CONSPRACY TO DEFRAUD THE U.S.A. IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 371,
ALL EMPLOYED BY OR ASSOCIATED WITH AN ENTERPRISE ENGAGED IN, OR ACTIVITIES AFFECTED INTERSTATE OR FOREIGN COMMERCE & ALL CONDUCTED OR PARTICIPATED DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY IN THE CONDUCT OF THE “BIOLOGICAL WARFARE – GEONCIDE – TERRORIST GROUP” THROUGH A PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY OR COLLECTION OF UNLAWFUL DEBT IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C.A. § 1962(c)AND/OR CONSPIRED TO VIOLATE “THE RICO ACT(VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C.A section 1962(d) (RICO)SCHEME TO DEFRAUD BOTH SHARON AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER OUT OF MONEY AND/OR PROPERTY WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW) AND/OR “ATTEMPT” AND CONTINUE TO “ATTEMPT” TO KILL THE TWO WITNESSES WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW
CLAIMANT AND/OR PLAINTIFF INCORPORATE EXH. A AS FULLY SET FORTH HEREIN(SEE BELOW)
CONVICTION, SENTENCE AND INCARCERATE ALL PERPERATORS FOR THE COV-19 “PLANDEMIC” TO COMMIT GENOCIDE ON HUMANITY, FOR RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY(HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS WAR CRIMES, GENOCIDE,
NOTICE OF“RETROACTIVE INTERVENTION OF “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR(JUDGE, PROSECUTOR, CLERK, ETC.-SEE BELOW)” IN ALL DISMISSED CASE ENTITLED SHARON BRIDGEWATER VS. “HAYES VALLEY LIMITED PARTNERHIP ET AL IN THE SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA SUPERIOR[STATE COURT] CASE # CGC-08-478207 AND IN ALL DISMISSED CASES ENTITLED SHARON BRIDGEWATER VS. “THE U.S.A./”PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP CASES FROM AUGUST 2008 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT AND/OR FROM JAN. 1, 1993
Declaratory Judgment Act(The declaratory Judgment act permits adjudifiation of an actual controversty between parties that is manifest or that is unaviable in the immediate future, an actual, ripe[INCLUDE ACTUAL LANGUAGE] controversy exist between the “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR” AND MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS “DEFACTO” for his actions of identity theft(illegal use of my name in the U.S. Court of Appeals, list all crimes 2and to “declare” the rights and legal relations of the parties to the controversy(JOE BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS, MERRICK GARLAND, DONALD TRUMP, ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, ALL; such declarations have the force and effect of a final judgment. This common law court has ripen, and ripe for adjudification. COMMON LAW REMEDIES AND PURSUANT TO THE RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATION ACT!
THE TWO WITNESSES – BACKGROUND(SPECIAL INVESTMENT GROUP LLC – A POOL OF REAL ESTATE INVESTORS – HOURS OF MY CREATIVE WORK – ATTORNEY ENGAGED IN INTERSTATE AND FOREIGN COMMERCE
JAMES – LICENSE CALIFORNIA REAL ESTATE BROKER WHICH PERMITED HIM TO BUY AND/OR “BROKER” PROPERTIES THROUGHOUT THE U.S.A. (A MOTHER AND SON TEAM WITH THE POTENTIONAL TO MAKE “BILLIONS” VIA INTERSTATE AND FOREIGN COMMERCE
AT ALL TIMES MENTION BOTH SHARON AND JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER AND/OR U.S. CITIZENS AND/OR “HUMANITY” had U.S. Constitutional Rights and/or rights which include the right to identity, or the ability to control both one’s physical and mental integrity; (2) the right to agency, or the freedom of thought and free will to choose one’s own actions; (3) the right to mental privacy, or the ability to keep thoughts protected against disclosure; (4) the right to be free from being guinea pigs in an COV-19 experimental injection(violations of Nuremberg Code) the right to be free from “HEADS OF STATE” TRICK, FRAUD, THREAT, COERCION, DECEPTION TO ENSLAVE AND CONTROL HUMANITY – PREDICTIVE POLICING, AND THE RIGHT TO KNOW WHAT IS INJECTED INTO OUR BODIES USE TRICK SCHEME TO INJECT NANO-TECHNOLOGY VIA A COV-19 INJECTION- SEE BELOW !!)
- The right to be reasonably protected from the accused.
- The right to reasonable, accurate, and timely notice of any public court proceeding, or any parole proceeding, involving the crime or of the release or escape of the accused.
- The right not to be excluded from any such public court proceeding, unless the court, after receiving clear and convincing evidence, determines that testimony by the victim would be materially altered if the victim heard other testimony at that proceeding.
- The right to be reasonably heard IN THE OPEN COURT public proceeding in the district court involving release, plea, sentencing, or any parole proceeding.
- The reasonable right to confer with MYSELF AS “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR AND OTHER U.S. CITIZENS in the case.
- The right to full and timely restitution as provided by law.
- The right to proceedings free from unreasonable delay.
- The right to be treated with fairness and with respect for the victim’s dignity and privacy
- The right to be informed in a timely manner of any plea bargain or deferred prosecution agreement.
- The right to be informed of the rights under this section and the services described in section 503(c) of the Victims’ Rights and Restitution Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 10607(c)) and provided contact information for the Office of the Victims’ Rights Ombudsman of the Department of Justice(via “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR”).
waives sovereign immunity for maritime claims against the United States, FURTHER THE U.S. GOVERNMENT ACTS A COMMERICAL ENTERPRIZE VIA THE PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP AND IS NOT IMMUNE VIA ADMIRALITY AND MARITIME LAW
28 U.S. Code § 1605 – General exceptions to the jurisdictional immunity of a foreign state
https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/content/rico-act.html
RETROACTIVE IMPLICATION OF THIS ADMIRALTY AND CLAIM, EQUITABLE TOLLING AND/OR TOLLING OF THE STATUE OF LIMITATION
(JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT)
CLICK HERE BRIDGEWATER INJURED AND DAMAGED – DISABILITY FOR DEPRESSION FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUNING THRU TO PRESENT)
THE STATE of Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming[the District of Columbia, the Common wealth of Puerto Rico, The US Virgin Island, Guam, theNorthern Marianna Islands, the American Samoa] EX REL Sharon Bridgewater (A.K.A. Sharon Abusalem, Sharon Davis) Private Attorney General and QUI TAM RELATOR[The Federal Trade Commission, The Bureau of Consumer Protection, Bureau of Competition, Securities and Exchange Commission]on behalf of myself, James S. Bridgewater( one or more of the following companies, Specialty Investment Group L.L.C., a Georgia Company, Specialty Global Investments Inc., a Nevada Corporation, and Bridgewater & Company Inc., a California Corporation, The Coalition for Empowerment(formerly Greater Lansing Helping Hands)a 501C-3 non-profit organization, a Michigan and/or Georgia non-profit corporation, B & B Building Maintenance INC. a Michigan Corporation, and those similarly situated – “ALL PLAINTIFFS,” “ALL APPELLANTS,” ALL CLAIMANTS,”
FROM 1993 and continuing thru present REPRESENTATIVE[1]” have been systematically deprived of their fundental right to due process of law, (from 1993 and continuing thru present)as guarenteed by the Bill of Rights, and/or the Declaration of Human right, as long as said unconstitutional statues have been allowed to remain on the books
That Plaintiff have such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, under the full range of relevant circumstances which have occasioned the instant action. AND/OR Judgment WRIT OF ATTACHMENT in the amount of Plaitniffs damages, tighter with interest thereon form the rrespective dates due, cost, disbursements, and reasonable attorney fees.
- That process in due form of law according to the practice of this court in cases of admirality and maritime jurisdiction April issue against the Defendant cititng it to apprear and answer all the matters described in this complaint.
EXH.’S AS FOLLOWS:
COMMON LAW JURSIDICTION VIA ADMIRALITY AND MARTIME LAW!!
“ADMIRALTY AND MARTIME LAW PERMITS “COMMON LAW REMEDIES WHEN NO ADEQUATE REMEDIES ARE AT LAW, DENIAL OF COURT ACCESS, DISMISSAL OF 50 OR MORE COMPLAINTS, SCHEMES TO DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES WIRE FRAThe property in dispute is within the jurisidiction of the district of Columbia, or will be during the pendency of this action. Pursuant Supplimental rule requires that a complaint state the circumstances from which the claim arises with such particularly that the Defendants or claimant will be able, without moving for a more definite statement, to commence an investigation of the facts Supplimental Rule for certain admirality and martime claims b(1), C(2) and/or other Supplimental rules require that the rem actions be instituted by means of a verified complaint. THE VERFIED COMPLAINT IS AS FOLLOWS:
COMMON LAW COURT FORMS(BELOW) AS FOLLOWS:
APPOINTMENT(S) AS FOLLOWS:
LIST
INCLUDE “COMMON LAW FORM WITH SEAL”(INCLUDE CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE WITH THIS FORM)
THE FOLLOWING IS THE OFFICIAL “COMMON LAW APPOINTMENT CLAUSE” OF “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR MODELED AFTER THE BELOW FORM #1
FORM #1
“THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL APPOINTS HERSELF AS PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA! EFFECTIVE DATE: JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT, ALL EXECUTIVE ORDERED ISSUED BY ALL PRESIDENTS, U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES ARE NL
FEDERAL RESERVE CHAIR,
BILL OF PARTICULAR
This bill of particulars serves to inform ALL CRIMINAL CLASS REPRESENTATIVES(BIDEN, HARRIS, GARLAND, AND CHIEF “DEFACTO U.S. CHIEF SUPREME COURT JUDGE ROBERTS DEFENDANT AND “JUDGMENT DEBTORS” on behalf of all “HEADS OF STATES” CORPORATIONS, et al )the nature of the charges and the evidence, based upon a breach of “transnational/international admiralty and maritime”contract and/or promise(expressed or implied). The date the date, time, and place the contract was agreed upon, the subject matter of the contract, the “Racketeering Conspiracy(Treason, Geoncide, War Crimes, violations of the Numerberg Code, Extortion, Wire Fraud, Mail Fraud, Major Bank Fraud, Terrorism, Weapons of Mass Destruction, Conspiracy to defraud the USA and its agencies in violation of 18 USC section 371(from Jan. 1, 1993 thru to present) and nearly every crimes as defined in 18 U.S.C. section 1961, conspiracy to defraud the 50 States of is based upon a debt for money due and owing $150 TRILLION DOLLARS AND SCHEME TO DEFRAUD THE 50 STATES EX REL OF THIS AMOUNT, WHICH RICO PROVIDES FOR TREBLE DAMAGES, AND 375 TRILLION IS NOW DUE AND OWNING IN ADDITION TO “THE FAKE COVID PLANDEMIC” CRIMINAL ACTS OF VIOLATIONS OF NUMERBERG CODE ON”HUMANITY, AND ATTEMPTS ON HUMANITY)7-8 BILLION PEOPLE (WHICH AMOUNTS TO 1 QUADRILLION DOLLARS WHICH A, ALSO, EVERY ACT account or other written instrument, a copy of any books of account or other written documents upon which the action is based shall be included in the bill of particulars. ) $ Amount of money claimed =
“THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR CLASS REPRESENTATIVE (“FOR THE 50 STATES AND/OR “WE THE
PEOPLE”)CLAIMANT – JUDGMENT -CREDITOR sues/claims from defendants
_____________________________________________________________________________
(STATE OF FACTS) ALL KNEW A CRIMINAL PROCEEDING WERE PENDING IN PROCESS, ILLEGALLY UNLAWFULLY, CHANGED “COURT LAWS, WITHOUT THE RIGHT OR AUTHORITY” – SEE ALL TRIED AND CONVICTED(BELOW) ILLEGAL, UNLAWFULLY, UPURP PUBLIC OFFICE(BELOW)
COMES NOW SHARON[DAVIS- ABUSALEM]BRIDGEWATER(A U.S. CITIZEN & “FORMER REAL ESTATE BUSINESS OWNER RESTRAINED FROM INTERSTATE AND FOREIGN COMMERCE” VICTIM AND FEDERAL WITNESS INJURED AND DAMAGED IN BUSINESS, PERSON OR PROPERTY AND RESTRAINED FROM INTERSTATE AND FOREIGN COMMERCE DIRECTLY “DEFACTO” U.S. PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN(AND PREDECESSORS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO HIS TERM “LITERALLY”) JOINT PARTICIPATION AND/OR CONSPIRACY WITH A “TRANSNATIONAL/ INTERNATIONAL” SATANIC, “ANTICHRIST/HITLER” PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP “BIOLOGICAL WARFARE – WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION(MILITARY GRADE WEAPONS “NANO – TECHNOLOGY TERRORIST GROUP ENTERPRISE-SEE BELOW)
LIST ALL HERE
BY DIRECTLY BY JOE BIDEN[AN “EXTENTION OF BARAK H. OBAMA”] IN HIS “DEFACTO” OFFICIAL CAPACITY A PRESIDENT[PREDESSCORS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO HIS TERM AND ALL THOSE OPERATING UNDER HIS DIRECTION INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO KAMALA HARRIS “LITERALLY”
“REPRESENTATIVE YESHUA/JESUS CHRIST – GOD IN HEAVEN,” THE CREATOR OF ENTIRE UNIVERSE ( AND JUDGE AMERICA-U.S. GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS JOE BIDEN AND THOSE OPERATING UNDER HIS DIRECTION AND PREDESSCORS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO BIDEN’S TERM,-SEE BELOW””FOR PROMOTION COMETH NEITHER FROM THE EAST, NOR FROM THE WEST NOR FROM THE SOUTH. BUT GOD IS THE JUDGE; HE PUTTETH DOWN ONE, AND SETTETH UP ANOTHER. PSALMS 75:6-7, AND TO GATHER “THE NEW JERUSALEM-THE TEMPLE OF GOD”-MEN AND WOMEN CREATED IN THE IMAGE OF GOD (A RAINBOW OF COLORS,
SERVENTS OF YESHUA JESUS CHRIST WITH PURE HEARTS FOR HIM – “THE OFFICIAL EXTENTION OF THE TWELVE ISRAEL”[MEN AND WOMEN SCATTERED THROUGHOUT THE GLOBAL-THE SAINTS OF YESHUA/JESUS CHRIST AND ABRAHAM’S SEED [‘the abomination that causes desolation,’ spoken of through the prophet Daniel CURRENTLY STANDS IN THE HOLY PLACE JERSUALEM, )ASSEMBLED PURSUANT ON BEHALF OF THE SECOND WITNESS AND VICTIM ET AL VIA THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON[DAVIS-ABUSALEM] BRIDGEWAER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR & STAND BEFORE THE LORD OF THE EARTH JACOB ROTHCHILD (LUCIFERIAN, SATANIST AND #1 REPRESENTATIVE OF SATAN “LITERALLY” OWNER AND CONTROLLER OF ALL CENTRAL BANKS
AND FORFEIT ALL TANG
(1) Punish and deter criminal activity by depriving criminals of property used in or acquired
through illegal activities.
(2) Promote and enhance cooperation among federal, state, local, tribal, and foreign law
enforcement agencies.
(3) Recover assets that may be used to compensate victims when authorized under federal law.
(4) Ensure that the Program is administered professionally, lawfully, and in a manner consistent
with sound public policy.
GOD WARNS “HUMANITY!!” – CLICK HERE –
GOD SIGNALS THE SAINTS
AND CO-CONSPIRATORS – THE “BRITISH ROYALS” INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO AKA PRINCE CHARLES, AKA PRINCE WILLIAM “HIS SON” THE OFFICIAL ANTICHRIST(SEE BELOW)
2 She was pregnant and cried out in pain as she was about to give birth.
3 Then another sign appeared in heaven: an enormous red dragon with seven heads and ten horns and seven crowns on its heads.
“THE DRAGON(CHINA)WHO GIVES POWER TO THE ABOVE BEAST AND ANTI-CHRIST”
(SEE REVELATION 12 – ALSO SEE AMERICA JUDGED ON THIS WEBSITE– SEPTEMBER 23, 2017)
SEE OTHER TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDERS/PERMANENT INJUNCTION(ENTITLED “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR BELOW”)
GOD WARNS “HUMANITY!!” – CLICK HERE –
TO THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE & TO THE SUPREME JUDGE OF THE WORLD(SEE LAST PARAGRAPH IN THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE – GOD IN HEAVEN – YESHUA/JESUS CHRIST)
(https://thefounding.net/americas-founding-philosophy-god-as-supreme-judge-lawgiver-king/)
2 She was pregnant and cried out in pain as she was about to give birth.
3 Then another sign appeared in heaven: an enormous red dragon with seven heads and ten horns and seven crowns on its heads.
(SEE REVELATION 12 – ALSO SEE AMERICA JUDGED ON THIS WEBSITE– SEPTEMBER 23, 2017)
CONSPIRATOR JACOB ROTHCHILD(LUCIFERIAN, SATANIST AND #1 REPRESENTATIVE OF SATAN “LITERALLY” OWNER AND CONTROLLER OF ALL CENTRAL BANKS
ONE OR MORE PROSECUTOR, JUDGE, JURY, EXECUTIONER(FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE NUMERBERG CODE, CRIMES AGAINST THE TWO WITNESSES BOTH SHARON AND JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER(& “HUMANITY) IN VIOLATION OF INTERNATIONAL LAW
Crimes against humanity under international law
- Murder.
- Extermination.
- Enslavement. Deportation or forcible transfer of population.
- Imprisonment.
- Torture.
- Sexual violence.
- Persecution against an identifiable group.
- Enforced disappearance of persons.
MORE FAILURE TO MAINTAIN U.S. BORDERS(FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE “FORCED” INTERGRATION OF IMMIGRATES, REFUGEES, THE HOMELESS, VICTIMS OF DISPLACMENT VIA NATURAL DISASTERS- CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITYDefinition:
MORE FAILURE TO MAINTAIN U.S. BORDERS(FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE “FORCED” INTERGRATION OF IMMIGRATES, REFUGEES, THE HOMELESS, VICTIMS OF DISPLACMENT VIA NATURAL DISASTERS- CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITYDefinition:
[INTENTIONALLY High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program(HAARP) TO CONTROL WEATHER ), 8, U.S.C. §’s 1324(a), 1324(a)(2) 1324(a)(3), 1324(a)(1)(A)(i) 1324(a)(1)(A)(ii),1324(a)(1)(A)(iii), 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv), 1324(a)(1)(A) RACKETEERING OFFENSES(FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE TO DECLARE A PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY AND FORCE “ALL BOTH RICH AND POOR” TO RECEIVE THE GENE ALTERING NANO TECH – COVID INJECTION(SEE BELOW)
“THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR ON BEHALF OF MY SELF, MY SON AND OTHER PROPONENTS AND/OR HUMANITY OPPOSE AND OBJECT TO GOVERNMENT(U.S. GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, U.S. REPRESENTATIVES ET AL) FORCE, “FALSE IMPRISONMENT(“COV-19 LOCKDOWNS”), SLAVERY(HUMAN EXPLOITATION), HEALTH CARE FRAUD, COV-19 INJECTION – NANO-TECHONOGOLY TO CONTROL OUR THOUGHT PROCESS AND ENS
COERCION, THREAT AND PYSCHOLOGICAL PRESSURE TO COMPEL US TO ACT CONTRARY TO OUR WISHES OR INTEREST TO GET A “COV-19 INJECTION(A MILITARY GRADE WEAPON WHICH IS LINKED TO 5 G & WHICH CONTAINS NANO-TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPED BY ONE OR MORE ELON MUSK COMPANY NEURALINK,
Crimes against humanity under international law
- Murder.
- Extermination.
- Enslavement. Deportation or forcible transfer of population.
- Imprisonment.
- Torture.
- Sexual violence.
- Persecution against an identifiable group.
- Enforced disappearance of persons.
The crime of forcible transfer of population includes “the full range of coercive pressures on people to flee their homes, including death threats, destruction of their homes, and other acts of persecution, such as depriving members of a group of employment, denying them access to schools, and forcing them to wear a symbol of their religious identity.”98
In order to be recognized as a crime against humanity under the requirements put forth by the ICC, the forced transfer of population also must be committed as “part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population, with knowledge of the attack.”99 The “attack” does not necessarily need to be a military attack as defined under international humanitarian law, and “need not even involve military forces or armed hostilities, or any violent force at all.
DOMESTIC TERRORISM & ELECTION FRAUD(A)FOR FINANCIAL GAIN.S S. BRIDGEWATER( HUMAN LIFE)
THAT ARE IN VIOLATION OF THE LAW OF THE U.S. AND/OR INTERNATIONAL LAW, WHICH ARE INTENDED TO INTIMIDATE, COERCE(THE TWO WITNESSES & HUMANITY[MEMBERS OF A CIVILIAN POPULATION)& TO INFLUENCE THE POLICY OF THE GOVERNMENT BY INTIMIDATION OR COERCION & TO AFFECT THE CONDUCT OF OF “THE GLOBAL GOVERNMENT” BY MASS DESTRUCTION, 18 U.S. Code § 2331 -“national of the United States” has the meaning given such term in section 101(a)(22) of the Immigration and Nationality Act;
attempted use, or threated use of physical force against the person of another; or (2) extortion, involves use of explosives, or otherwise involves conduct that presents a serious potential risk of physical injury to another. All maintained a________committed offenses as part of a pattern of cr
individual, entity, or organization engaged in planning or perpetrating any any [1] Federal crime of terrorism (as defined in section 2332b (g)(5)) against the United States, citizens or residents of the United States, or their property, and all assets, foreign or domestic, affording any person a source of influence over any such entity or organization;
(ii) acquired or maintained by any person with the intent and for the purpose of supporting, planning, conducting, or concealing any Federal crime of terrorism (as defined in section 2332b (g)(5) [2] against the United States, citizens or residents of the United States, or their property;
(iii) derived from, involved in, or used or intended to be used to commit any Federal crime of terrorism (as defined in section 2332b (g)(5)) against the United States, citizens or residents of the United States, or their property; or
(iv) of any individual, entity, or organization engaged in planning or perpetrating any act of international terrorism (as defined in section 2331) against any international organization (as defined in section 209 of the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 (22 U.S.C. 4309 (b)) or against any foreign Government. [3] Where the property sought for forfeiture is located beyond the territorial boundaries of the United States, an act in furtherance of such planning or perpetration must have occurred within the jurisdiction of the United States. (H) Any property, real or personal, involved in a violation or attempted violation, or which constitutes or is derived from proceeds traceable to a violation, of section 2339C of this title.((5) the term “Federal crime of terrorism” means an offense that— (A) is calculated to influence or affect the conduct of government by intimidation or coercion, or to retaliate against government conduct; and (B) is a violation of— (i) section 32 (relating to destruction of aircraft or aircraft facilities), 37 (relating to violence at international airports), 81 (relating to arson within special maritime and territorial jurisdiction), 175 or 175b (relating to biological weapons), 175c (relating to variola virus), 229 (relating to chemical weapons), subsection (a), (b), (c), or (d) of section 351 (relating to congressional, cabinet, and Supreme Court assassination and kidnaping), 831 (relating to nuclear materials), 832 (relating to participation in nuclear and weapons of mass destruction threats to the United States) 842(m) or (n) (relating to plastic explosives), 844(f)(2) or (3) (relating to arson and bombing of Government property risking or causing death), 844(i) (relating to arson and bombing of property used in interstate commerce), 930(c) (relating to killing or attempted killing during an attack on a Federal facility with a dangerous weapon), 956(a)(1) (relating to conspiracy to murder, kidnap, or maim persons abroad), 1030(a)(1) (relating to protection of computers), 1030(a)(5)(A) resulting in damage as defined in 1030(c)(4)(A)(i)(II) through (VI) (relating to protection of computers), 1114 (relating to killing or attempted killing of officers and employees of the United States), 1116 (relating to murder or manslaughter of foreign officials, official guests, or internationally protected persons), 1203 (relating to hostage taking), 1361 (relating to government property or contracts), 1362 (relating to destruction of communication lines, stations, or systems), 1363 (relating to injury to buildings or property within special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States), 1366(a) (relating to destruction of an energy facility), 1751(a), (b), (c), or (d) (relating to Presidential and Presidential staff assassination and kidnaping), 1992 (relating to terrorist attacks and other acts of violence against railroad carriers and against mass transportation systems on land, on water, or through the air), 2155 (relating to destruction of national defense materials, premises, or utilities), 2156 (relating to national defense material, premises, or utilities), 2280 (relating to violence against maritime navigation), 2280a (relating to maritime safety), 2281 through 2281a (relating to violence against maritime fixed platforms), 2332 (relating to certain homicides and other violence against United States nationals occurring outside of the United States), 2332a (relating to use of weapons of mass destruction), 2332b (relating to acts of terrorism transcending national boundaries), 2332f (relating to bombing of public places and facilities), 2332g (relating to missile systems designed to destroy aircraft), 2332h (relating to radiological dispersal devices), 2332i (relating to acts of nuclear terrorism), 2339 (relating to harboring terrorists), 2339A (relating to providing material support to terrorists), 2339B (relating to providing material support to terrorist organizations), 2339C (relating to financing of terrorism), 2339D (relating to military-type training from a foreign terrorist organization), or 2340A (relating to torture) of this title; (ii) sections 92 (relating to prohibitions governing atomic weapons) or 236 (relating to sabotage of nuclear facilities or fuel) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 ( 42 U.S.C. 2122 or 2284); (iii) section 46502 (relating to aircraft piracy), the second sentence of section 46504 (relating to assault on a flight crew with a dangerous weapon), section 46505(b)(3) or (c) (relating to explosive or incendiary devices, or endangerment of human life by means of weapons, on aircraft), section 46506 if homicide or attempted homicide is involved (relating to application of certain criminal laws to acts on aircraft), or section 60123(b) (relating to destruction of interstate gas or hazardous liquid pipeline facility) of title 49; or (iv) section 1010A of the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (relating to narco-terrorism).
(2) For purposes of paragraph (1), the term “proceeds” is defined as follows: (A) In cases involving illegal goods, illegal services, unlawful activities, and telemarketing and health care fraud schemes, the term “proceeds” means property of any kind obtained directly or indirectly, as the result of the commission of the offense giving rise to forfeiture, and any property traceable thereto, and is not limited to the net g
IN FURTHERANCE ONE OR MORE TERRORIST GROUPS OR GANGS(from JAN 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU PRESENT
On September 11, 2012[THE SAME DAY AS THE 2001 911 ATTACK ON THE TRADE CENTER BUILDING] at 9:40 pm local time, members of Ansar al-Sharia attacked the American diplomatic compound in Benghazi resulting in the deaths of both United States Ambassador to Libya J. Christopher Stevens and U.S. Foreign Service Information Management Officer Sean Smith.
At around 4:00 a.m. on September 12, the group launched a mortar attack against a CIA annex approximately one mile (1.6 km) away, killing two CIA contractors Tyrone S. Woods and Glen Doherty https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_Benghazi_attack ]
) IN IRAN,
Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard set to be proscribed as terror group
https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/isis-khorasan-poses-threat-to-taliban-in-afghanistan-report-3658711
https://www.wsj.com/articles/germany-dismantles-suspected-qanon-inspired-terrorist-group-11670405579
gangs
VIOLATIONS OF ONE OR MORE FAILURE TO MAINTAIN U.S. BORDERS, 8, U.S.C. §’s 1324(a), 1324(a)(2) 1324(a)(3), 1324(a)(1)(A)(i) 1324(a)(1)(A)(ii),1324(a)(1)(A)(iii), 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv), 1324(a)(1)(A) RACKETEERING OFFENSES(AND JOINT PARTICIPATION WITH FOREIGN OFFICIALS(“ALL INTERNATIONAL HEADS OF STATE” INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO “THE POPE”)
ex·e·cu·tion·er
CLERK AND JUDGE AND SENTENCE U.S. PUBLIC OFFICIALS FOR ACTING IN JOINT PARTICIPATION WITH CHINA’S XI JINPING ET AL TO “TURN-CHANGE MEN AND WOMEN DNA(TO A CREATURE-SEE BELOW), ENSLAVE, IMPRISION U.S. CITIZENS AND DEFRAUD U.S. CITIZENS OUT OF ALL THEIR MONEY AND/OR PROPERTY WITHOUT DUE PROCES OF LAW AND CONSPIRING TO CONTROL BRAIN, THOUGHTS, ENSLAVE THE TWO WITNESSES AND/OR HUMANTY
“THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR ON BEHALF OF MY SELF, MY SON AND OTHER PROPONENTS AND/OR HUMANITY OPPOSE AND OBJECT TO GOVERNMENT(U.S. GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, U.S. REPRESENTATIVES ET AL) FORCE, “FALSE IMPRISONMENT(“COV-19 LOCKDOWNS”), SLAVERY(HUMAN EXPLOITATION), HEALTH CARE FRAUD, COV-19 INJECTION – NANO-TECHONOGOLY TO CONTROL OUR THOUGHT PROCESS AND ENS
COERCION, THREAT AND PYSCHOLOGICAL PRESSURE TO COMPEL US TO ACT CONTRARY TO OUR WISHES OR INTEREST TO GET A “COV-19 INJECTION(A MILITARY GRADE WEAPON WHICH IS LINKED TO 5 G & WHICH CONTAINS NANO-TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPED BY ONE OR MORE ELON MUSK COMPANY NEURALINK, COV-19 INJECTION(JOE BIDEN, TRUMP & OBAMA CONSPIRACY – THE REASON FOR THE FREE OBAMA PHONE)CONSPIRED TO ABUSE THE COURTS, EXPLOIT, EXTERMINATE THE TWO WITNESSES DEFRAUD OUT OF 125 TRILLION DOLLARS, CHANGE DNA
- FRAUD, CONCEALMENT AND SCHEME TO ENSLAVE THE TWO WITNESSES(AND/OR HUMANITY BY COV-19 INJECTION)to identity(or the ability to control both one’s physical and mental integrity)
- Evaded the two witnesses right to mental privacy(or the ability to keep thoughts protected against disclosure)
- Evaded mental privacy(or the ability to keep thoughts protected against disclosure)
- Evaded the two witnesses right to fair access to mental(or the right to protection algorithmic bias, or the ability to ensure that technologies do not insert prejudices)
OBAMA DARPHA BRAIN IMPLANTS AND FREE “OBAMA CELL PHONES” CELL PHONES TO CONTROL THEN SLAVE VIA THE 5G NETWORK
https://www.science.org/content/article/darpa-wants-fix-broken-brains-restore-lost-memories
https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/BRAIN
IN CONJUNCTION WITH U.S. SUPREME COURT ORDER TO “PATENT” EVERY U.S. CITIZEN(MAKE PROPERTY OF THE GLOBAL ELITE VIA COV-19 DNA GENE EDITING-CHANGING MEN AND WOMEN CREATED THE IMAGINE OF GOD TO CHANGING MEN IN THE IMAGINE OF SATAN(SEE BELOW)
– GENETIC TO “LUCIFER” RACE, “CUT OFF” THE TWO WITNESSES BLOOD LINE VIA EXERMINATION(, FORCE THE TWO WITNESSES TO USE ARTIFICIAL WOMB
THE INTERNATIONAL BIOWEAPONS TERRORIST RACKETEERING ENTERPRISE FOR THEIR ILLEGAL “COVID PLANDEMIC GENOCIDE ON HUMANITY AND MISINFORMATION VIA COVID-19 misinformation,”FRAUD PERPETRATOR ON HUMANITY” ongoing pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) WHICH SUPPOSEDLY caused severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)(“biological agent” microorganism (including, but not limited to, bacteria, viruses, fungi, rickettsiae or protozoa), or infectious substance, or any naturally occurring, bioengineered or synthesized component of any such microorganism or infectious substance, capable of causing— (A) death, disease, or other biological malfunction in a human, an animal, a plant, or another living organism; (B) deterioration of food, water, equipment, supplies, or material of any kind; or (C) deleterious alteration of the environment; as defined in the Racketeered Influenced Corrupt Organization Act 18 U.S. Code § 175,), first identified in December 2019 in Wuhan, China, AND declared an international health emergency by the World Health Organization (WHO) in January 2020 and a pandemic on March 11, ONE OR MORE DONALD TRUMP, JOE BIDEN, “PUBLIC OFFICIALS” INTERNATIONAL HEADS OF STATE Hundreds of millions of people contracted the disease, a percentage of whom died from THE COV-19 DEATH JAB, AND AS A RESULT THE PERPERTATORS RETRAINED INTERSTATE AND FOR COMMERCE “GLOBALLY” TO WIT; travel restrictions, social distancing measures, and many other “fake” precautions have been taken to prevent the spread of the fake COVID-19 while the death jab underwent phased distribution in most countries to depopulate, tag and track all ……………………..
-CLICK HERE FOR
VIDEO #4
https://www.bitchute.com/embed/YuGUrunEBzDI/?feature=oembed#?secret=9QrQ1V2d0b
“In 2023, we plan to launch Google accounts on Fitbit, which will enable use of Fitbit with a Google account,” the Google-owned fitness devices maker said.
https://thehackernews.com/2022/09/google-to-make-account-login-mandatory.html
VIDEO #1
THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT THE END RESULT OF THIS “NANO-TECH” LOOK LIKE IN THE BODY AS FOLLOWS:
https://www.theconsciouschallenge.org/ecologicalfootprintbibleoverview/energy-electromagnetic-fields
https://www.theconsciouschallenge.org/ecologicalfootprintbibleoverview/energy-electromagnetic-fields
TELSAPHORESIS – THE FIRST FIVE LETTERS ARE THE SAME AS “THE COMPANY TELSA”(ELON MUSK CO-CONSPIRATOR TO CHANGE MEN DNA – SEE BELOW VIDEO)!!
THIS IS WHAT’S COMING OUT OF DEAD PEOPLE(VICTIMS) WHO RECEIVED THE COVID INJECTION VICTIMS(“CARBON NANOTUBES RUBBERY FIBERS -ELECTRICITY CIRCUITS RFID NANO SENSORS”FORMED UNDER THE 5G NETWORK An electromagnetic field (EMF) is a physical field produced by stationary, spinning or moving electrically charged particles, ONE OR MORE CELL PHONES, STREET LIGHTS ):
WHEN REPORTED A GAS LEAK, NOT TO USE CELL PHONE
OUR CELL PHONES ARE USING INFRARED
BIDEN HAD A LEGAL DUTY TO INFORM THE TWO WITNESSES AND/OR U.S. CITIZENS HIS INTENT TO “MERGE” MACHINE AND U.S. CITIZENS VIA TRANSHUMAN(DEFINITION OF TRANSHUMAN: transhumanism, philosophical and scientific movement that advocates the use of current and emerging technologies—such as genetic engineering, cryonics, artificial intelligence (AI), and nanotechnology—to augment human capabilities and improve the human condition. Transhumanists envision a future in which the responsible application of such technologies enables humans to slow, reverse, or eliminate the aging process, to achieve corresponding increases in human life spans, and to enhance human cognitive and sensory capacities. The movement proposes that humans with augmented capabilities will evolve into an enhanced species that transcends humanity—the “posthuman.” Executive Order on Advancing Biotechnology and Biomanufacturing Innovation for a Sustainable, Safe, and Secure American Bioeconomy) & KNOWINGLY, INTENTIONALLY CONCEALED KNOWN FACTS FROM THE TWO WITNESSES AND U.S. CITIZEN AND ON SEPTEMBER 12, 2022 ISSUED EXECUTIVE ORDER Executive Order on Advancing Biotechnology and Biomanufacturing Innovation for a Sustainable, Safe, and Secure American Bioeconomy
ENSLAVE, CHANGE THE TWO WITNESSES (CREATED IN THE IMAGE OF GOD) DNA VIA THE COV-19 INJECTION AND “MAKE INHUMANE” THE TWO WITNESSES AND HUMANITY] – JOINT PARTICIPATION WITH FOREIGN OFFICIALS – “THE INTERNATIONAL/DOMESTIC TERRORIST GROUP” – OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE AND/OR OBSTRUCTION OF 18 U.S.C. §1503 AND/OR 18 U.S. Code § 1505 – Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees, international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331)(HUMANITY)AND U.S.A. IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 371 ETC.
-CLICK HERE FOR
ALL CO-CONSPIRATORS KNEW AND WERE AWARE OF “THE 50 STATES GOING PUBLIC” AND KNEW AND WHERE AWARE OF THEIR NUMBERBERG VIOLATIONS AND CRIMES THEY COMMITTED ON HUMANITY WITHOUT KNOWLEDGE OR CONSENT – AND TO “SOFTEN THE BLOW AND/OR TO JUSTIFY THEIR ILLEGAL CRIMINAL ACTS AGAINST HUMANITY ” RELEASE THIS ARTICLE AS FOLLOWS:
VERY IMPORTANT VIDEO CLICK ON THE BELOW LINK- MUST SEE!!
https://rumble.com/v1q7y0h-covid-vax-plus-coming-tatoo-the-ideal-marriage.html
OTHER SUPPORTING VIDEOS:
THE COVID INJECTION IS A TOTAL FRAUD AND THE PRECURSOR TO THE ABOVE(GETTING HUMANITY WIRED” precursor WILL SOON BE ENFORCED UPON ALL HUMANITY
VIDEO #3
VIDEO #4
THE FOLLOWING IS AN EXAMPLE OF HOW THE INFRARED LIGHT ON OUR CELL INFRPHONE POINT DIRECTLY TO THE “COV-19 NANO TECH – POINTED DIRECTLY AT OUR BRAIN TO CONTROL AND ENSLAVE[TORTURE ETC.] AS FOLLOWS:
COMING MARK OF THE BEAST WHICH PARALLEL WITH BIDEN’S EXECUTIVE ORDER BIDEN’S DIGITAL DOLLAR(SEE BELOW)
CLICK HERE FOR 666 – SENSOR [ SEE ALSO U.S. SENATE BILL 6666 COVID TRACKING AND TRACING]
WO2020060606 – CRYPTOCURRENCY SYSTEM USING BODY ACTIVITY DATAPatent Scope
Biocompatible near-infrared quantum dots delivered to the skin by microneedle patches record vaccinationScience Translational Medicine
Quantum Dots Deliver Vaccines, Encode Vaccination History in the SkinPhotonics Media
Storing medical information below the skin’s surfaceMIT News
How we work Grant: Microchips Biotech Inc.Gates Foundation
Prepare for the next pandemic like a war says Bill GatesInquirer
Bill Gates funds birth control microchip that lasts 16 years inside the body and can be turned on or off with remote controlNational Post
Specialized dye, delivered along with a vaccine, could enable ‘on-patient’ storage of vaccination historyMedical Xpress
A Contraceptive Implant with Remote ControlMIT Technology Review
4 Coronavirus Vaccine Stocks the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Is Betting OnMicrosoft News
Gates Foundation, Pharmaceutical Companies Join to Advance Coronavirus VaccinesUS News
The Alliance, a collaborative effort of global partnersID 2020
ID2020 Launches Technical Certification MarkMedium
Journalism’s Gates keepersColumbia Journalism Review
Bill Gates backs a $1 billion plan to cover Earth in ‘Big Brother’ satellites capable of streaming ‘live and unfiltered’ HD footage of the planetDaily Mail UK
Vaccine maker backed by Bill & Melinda Gates soars 40%CNN Business
Source: the11throck.com/…ealth-empire-luciferase-and-patent-wo-2020-060606/
For more information:Questioning the official account–One year of Global Health Tyranny.–Brutal Health
https://gloria.tv/post/arbwPujw3tCi3DrbuMr3NbQ9a
NEW PAGE LINK
THE SAME “RICE UNIVERSITY” INVENTORS OF TELSAPHORESIS(SEE VIDEO #1) IS THE SAME UNIVERSITY THAT INVENTED THE LUCIFERASE “LUCIFER” “RACE” QUANTUM DOT TATTOO – SEE BELOW:
AND SCHEME TO DEFRAUD US(THE TWO WITNESSES, U.S. AND/OR HUMANITY OUT OF ALL MONEY AND PROPERTY WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW – CONSOLIDATE THE U.S. WITH CHINA’S CASHLESS CURRENCY
https://www.thefinalexodus.com/biden-harris-scheme-to-deplete-our-cash
ACTING IN JOINT PARTICIPATION WITH THE MEDIA, MAJOR CORPORATIONS – DIGITAL CURRENCY TO DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES OUT OF ALL MONEY AND PROPERTY IN THE BANK(PARALLEL WITH CHINA CASHLESS SOCIETY-BIDEN DITITAL DOLLARS )
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2023/jan/02/third-of-world-economy-to-hit-recession-in-2023-imf-head-warns
INCLUDE VIDEO HERE
SINISTER TO THE TWO WITNESSES BLOODLINE VIA EXTERMINATION AND REPLACE ” WITH SATANIC – DNA REPTIALIAN MADE BABIES MADE IN THE IMAGE OF SATAN AND CONTROLLED BY THE GLOBAL ELITE AS FOLLOWS
UK to embark on groundbreaking new genomics projects(“Deceivers!!
they “in joint participation with China,
https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/health-china-bgi-dna/ ” )
Programmes involving millions of volunteers will cement Britain’s place as leader in DNA research
https://www.ft.com/content/f4a68aaf-86d8-449f-ab2b-c24a5368b665
SINISTER TO REPLACE “ALL HUMAN BEINGS WITH SATANIC – DNA REPTIALIAN MADE BABIES MADE IN THE IMAGE OF SATAN AND CONTROLLED BY THE GLOBAL ELITE AS FOLLOWS
ENSLAVE, CHANGE THE TWO WITNESSES (CREATED IN THE IMAGE OF GOD) DNA VIA THE COV-19 INJECTION AND “MAKE INHUMANE” THE TWO WITNESSES AND HUMANITY] – JOINT PARTICIPATION WITH FOREIGN OFFICIALS – “THE INTERNATIONAL/DOMESTIC TERRORIST GROUP” – OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE AND/OR OBSTRUCTION OF 18 U.S.C. §1503 AND/OR 18 U.S. Code § 1505 – Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees, international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331)(HUMANITY)AND U.S.A. IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 371 ETC.
MILITARY GRADE BIO-WEAPON ON THE TWO WITNESSES VIA 5 G
IN FURTHER OF THE OBJECTIVE OF THE CONSPIRACY – ALL KNEW AND WERE AWARE THAT I WOULD EXPOSE THE TRUTH, AND MARKETED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIENCE(SO THAT PEOPLE WOULD EXECUSE THEIR ILLEGAL, CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR OF INJECTING THE GLOBAL POPULATION WITH “THE COV-19 NANO TECH – 5G MILITARY GRADE WEAPON”) TO MAKE MORE APPEALING BY SHOWING THE DIFFERENT PICTURES AND IMAGING AI CAN MAKE OF “ONESELF” AND TO “JUSTIFY” OR “SOFTEN THE BLOW” OF THE COVID NANO TECH. INJECTION!!
OTHER SUPPORTING VIDEOS:
THE COVID INJECTION IS A TOTAL FRAUD AND THE PRECURSOR TO THE ABOVE(GETTING HUMANITY WIRED” precursor WILL SOON BE ENFORCED UPON ALL HUMANITY
VIDEO #3
ONE WAY OUT – A NEW BODY AND LAY DOWN YOU LIFE FOR CHRIST
WHICH PARALLELL WITH CHINA’S DIGITAL CASHLESS SOCIETY, UNDER THE SKIN SURVIELLANCE(AND JOE BIDEN’S DIGITAL DOLLAR AND EXECUTIVE ORDER – TO DEFRAUD ALL OF HUMANITY OUT OF ALL MONEY IN THE BANK AND PROPERTY AS FOLLOWS:
TWO WITNESSES VIDEO ON HOW THE VACCINE WORKED. THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT THE COVID INJECTION IS DOING INSIDE THE BODY OF HUMANS UNDER THE 5G NETWORK(BUILDING CIRCUITS IN THE HUMAN BODY WITHOUT TOUCHING IT!!) IS INJECTED INTO THE HUMAN BODY VIA COVID INJECTION. WORKS INSIDE THE BODY AND ASSEMBLED BY 5G NETWORK _
ACTING IN JOINT PARTICIPATION AND/OR CONSPIRING WITH MAJOR CORPORATION TO VIOLATE MY 1ST AMENDMENT RIGHT – (PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP – CENSORSHIP)
https://townhall.com/columnists/wayneallynroot/2021/12/12/if-the-vaccine-is-so-great-why-are-so-many-people-dropping-dead-heart-attacks-skyrocket-young-children-suffer-heart-problems-soccer-players-drop-on-fields-icus-overwhelmed-from-coast-to-coast-n2600456 (THEIR ARE COUNTLESS TESTIMONIES AND ARTICLES WHICH PARALELL WITH THE ABOVE ARTICLE)
(OVERT ACT – ALL HEADS OF STATE KNOW THE “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER WILL SOON ARREST AND/OR KNOW THEY ARE WANTED IN THE U.S.A. FOR CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY ETC., IN ADDITION THEY KNOW PEOPLE WILL SIDE WITH “THE 50 STATES EX REL BRIDGEWATER” FOR PROSECUTION – MOST SCRAP TRAVEL RESTRICTIONS AS FOLLOWS: TRAVEL RESTRICTIONS AND
F
BIDEN’S OVERT ACT TO HELP HOMELESS, IS DECEPTION AND FRAUD, HE KNEW AND WERE AWARE THAT “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHAORN BRIDGEWATER – REPRESENTATIVE OF 50 STATES AND NATIONAL SECURITY, AND KNEW AND WERE AWARE(OR SHOULD HAVE KNOWN BRIDGEWATER IS A THE VICTIM OF RETAILATION, HOMELESSNES AND DEPLACEMENT SINCE 2008(15 YEARS), THE FILING
OVERT, CRIMINAL ACT OF BIDEN AND HARRIS – DAMAGE CONTROL
___________________________________________
12/30/2022 OVERT, CRIMINAL ACT – DAMAGE CONTROL(ALL KNOW I AM VERY CLOSE TO GOING PUBLIC AND/OR COMPENSATING FRAUD, CONCEALMENT OF “COV-19 INJECTION(WHICH CHANGE PEOPLE-MEN AND WOMEN CREATED IN THE IMAGE OF GOD DNA FOREVER” VICTIMS AND KNOWING, INTENTIONALLY THAT THEY ARE LIABLE FOR THE DEATH PENALTY FOR EXPERIMENTING AND/OR CHANGING “HUMANITY” GENES VIA THE COV-19 INJECTION AND TO EXPERex AM VERY CLOSE TO GOING PUBLIC AND/OR SOLICITING VICTIMS AND KNOWING, INTENTIONALLY – SATANIST ROTHCHILD, U.K. GERMANY ETC. DAMAGE CONTROL AS FOLLOWS:
MASS HOMELESSNESS A PROBLEM IN THE U.S. – THEY CREATED IT IN AN INTENTIONAL ACTS TO OVERT, CRIMINAL ACT – TO SOFTEN THE BLOW AND TO “MASQUERADE” AS IF BIDEN IS DOING GOOD DEEDS TO – BIDEN IS REPSONSIBLE FOR ACTING IN JOINT PARTICIPATION WITH OBAMA FOR “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR HOMELESS, VIA RETAILATION AGAINS, AND BRIDGEWATER HAVE BEEN INJURED AND DMAGED BY BIDEN’S ACTS OR OMISSIONS – SEE THIS WEBSITE
SEE DECLARATORY JUDGMENT, TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER ARREST WARRANTS __
TO INJECT THE TWO WITNESSES WITH THE COV-19 INJECTION, MILITARY GRADE WEAPON OF MASS DESTRUCTION, CONTROL, BRAIN AND THOUGHTS, AND EXPLOIT THE TWO WITNESSES AND DEFRAUD OUT OUT MONEY AND/OR PROPERTY, ENSLAVE THE TWO WITNESSES LINKED TO THE DITIGAL DOLLAR AND FORCE TO RECEIVE THE QUANTOM DOT INSIBLE TATTO
US CONGRESSMAN AND WOMEN AND JEFF SESSIONS IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL ORGANIZATION (THE SOLDIERS)
150 TRILLION DOLLARS
(https://thefounding.net/americas-founding-philosophy-god-as-supreme-judge-lawgiver-king/)
RICO ACTS AS FOLLOWS:
ection 60123(b) (relating to destruction of interstate gas or hazardous liquid pipeline facility) of title 49; or (iv) section 1010A of the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (relating to narco-terrorism).
(2) For purposes of paragraph (1), the term “proceeds” is defined as follows: (A) In cases involving illegal goods, illegal services, unlawful activities, and telemarketing and health care fraud schemes, the term “proceeds” means property of any kind obtained directly or indirectly, as the result of the commission of the offense giving rise to forfeiture, and any property traceable thereto, and is not limited to the net g
OVERT ACTS OF BIDEN ET AL – ALL KNEW THAT I WAS CLOSE TO GOING PUBLIC AND KNEW AND WHERE AWARE THEY HAVE ARREST WARRANTS
ON OR ABOUT 12/26/2022 07:00
TO “SOFTEN THE BLOW” WHEN THIS WEBSITE GOES VIRAL, ALL BEGIN TO MARKET “PENIS’S IMAGES(VIA CARROTS, SWEETPOTATOE AND SEX) VIA THE MEDIA TO “OFFSET” THERE ILLEGAL ACTIONS OF GUY/HOMOSEXUALS SINGING TO CHILDREN “SUCK ME —(SEE BELOW)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2022/12/19/biden-homeless-plan/
‘A sea change’: Biden reverses decades of Chinese trade policy
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/12/26/china-trade-tech-00072232
https://www.texastribune.org/2022/12/27/title-42-us-mexico-border-supreme-court/
U.S. SUPREME COURT – UPHELD FOR NOW – UNTIL THEY CAN GET MORE U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES TO RETIRE – SIMILAR TO BREYER(retirement)
AND BIDEN, K. HARRIS & K.B. JACKSON(replacement to advance the RICO enterprise to issue more void orders for 125 trillion) CONSPIRACY TO ISSUE VOID SUPREME COURT JUSTICE ORDER BY ILLEGALLY, UNLAWFULLY USING MY NAME “SHARON BRIDGEWATER AND/OR JAMES. S. BRIDGEWATER WITHOUT THE RIGHT, (WIRE FRAUD, MAIL FRAUD, ETC.)
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/23507944/supreme-court-sonia-sotomayor-elena-kagan-ruth-bader-ginsburg-retire, AND paving way for more of Biden appointments of “corrupt judges” to commit wire fraud, etc. via his conspiracy with Hunter Biden, his son e-mail scandal fraud!!
https://www.texastribune.org/2022/12/27/title-42-us-mexico-border-supreme-court
https://townhall.com/columnists/wayneallynroot/2021/12/12/if-the-vaccine-is-so-great-why-are-so-many-people-dropping-dead-heart-attacks-skyrocket-young-children-suffer-heart-problems-soccer-players-drop-on-fields-icus-overwhelmed-from-coast-to-coast-n2600456 (THEIR ARE COUNTLESS TESTIMONIES AND ARTICLES WHICH PARALELL WITH THE ABOVE ARTICLE)
(OVERT ACT – ALL HEADS OF STATE KNOW THE “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER WILL SOON ARREST AND/OR KNOW THEY ARE WANTED IN THE U.S.A. FOR CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY ETC., IN ADDITION THEY KNOW PEOPLE WILL SIDE WITH “THE 50 STATES EX REL BRIDGEWATER” FOR PROSECUTION – MOST SCRAP TRAVEL RESTRICTIONS AS FOLLOWS: TRAVEL RESTRICTIONS AND
ENSLAVE, CHANGE THE TWO WITNESSES (CREATED IN THE IMAGE OF GOD) DNA VIA THE COV-19 INJECTION AND “MAKE INHUMANE” THE TWO WITNESSES AND HUMANITY] – JOINT PARTICIPATION WITH FOREIGN OFFICIALS – “THE INTERNATIONAL/DOMESTIC TERRORIST GROUP” – OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE AND/OR OBSTRUCTION OF 18 U.S.C. §1503 AND/OR 18 U.S. Code § 1505 – Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees, international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331)(HUMANITY)AND U.S.A. IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 371 ETC.
-CLICK HERE FOR
(SEE BELOW – Revelation 9:14-16 Many will die
14 Saying to the sixth angel which had the trumpet, Loose the four angels which are bound in the great river Euphrates.
15 And the four angels were loosed, which were prepared for an hour, and a day, and a month, and a year, for to slay the third part of men.
16 And the number of the army of the horsemen were two hundred thousand thousand: and I heard the number of them.
the government must establish the following three elements:
(1) the noncitizen came, entered or remained in the United States in
violation of the law,
(2) the defendant knew or recklessly disregarded that the noncitizen
entered or remained in the United States in violation of the law,
(3) the defendant concealed, harbored or shielded from detection the
noncitizen in any place, including any building or any means of
transportation
OR EXCEPT THE MARK OF THE BEAST
EDITED VIDEO COMING TO EXPLAIN WHO 5G FORMS THE
THE “LUCIFER” “RACE”: THE CHANGING OF HUMAN DNA TO “WHATEVER THEY WANT YOU TO BE” CONTROL OF THOUGHTS, ACTIONS, ETC.
ALSO CRIMINAL JURISDICTION AS FOLLOWS:
CLASS REPRESENTATIVES,
CONSPIRAED TO DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES OUT OF 125 TRILLION DOLLARS AND OWNERSHIP OF CORPORATION
https://rumble.com/v1q7y0h-covid-vax-plus-coming-tatoo-the-ideal-marriage.html
WHICH INTERFERE WITH OUR THOUGHT PROCESSES, & INTERFERE WITH OUR THOUGHT PROCESSES AND BEHAVIOR AND INFRINGE ON OUR RIGHT TO MENTAL INTERGRITY(REVEAL INFORMATION ABOUT OUR MENTAL STATE, INFRIDGE AND INFRIDGE ON OUR RIGHT TO MENTAL PRIVACY!!!
BIDEN/XI JINPING/ROTHCHILD DIGITAL DOLLAR AND EXECUTIVE ORDER
GENOCIDE, SLAVERY,
VIA
RICO PROVIDES TREBLE DAMAGES AND 375 TRILLION DOLLARS IS DUE AND NOW OWING ALONG WITH OTHER DAMAGES!!
JOE BIDEN(AND MAJOR CORPORATIONS) JOINT PARTICIPATION – ILLEGAL CENSORSHIP OF THE TWO WITNESSES VIOLATION OF FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS(WHICH PARALELL) WITH WW1, WW11, CENSORSHIP
INCLUDE MORE DOCTORS TESTIMONIES HERE
THE TWO WITNESSES AUTHORITY TO PROSECUTE AS FOLLOWS:
THE RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORG -CLICK HERE FOR THE LAW
Rule B further requires that the complaint be accompanied by an affidivant to the effect that the defendant can not be found within
f admirality and maritime jursiction. This is brought under the provisions of the Suits in Admirality and Maritme Act, 46 USC section 741 for relief on both rem and in personam principles. The said One Quadrillion ($1,000,000,000,000,000)now is or during the pendency of this action will be within this “COMMON LAW DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN.” Further this is a claim for damages suffered by the “the 50 United States ex rel Sharon Bridgewater private attorney general and/or Relator and/or the Class Plaintiff Representative Bridgewater and Class members. Thereto and person property theron, arising out of breach of “transnational” maritime contracts and/or negligence and/or trespass to the Class Plaintiff Bridgewater. The claim is within this honorable court’s maritime jurisdiction under 28 USC section 1331(1) and within FRCP 9(h)as fully appears. Alternatively, Plaintiff causes of action for negligence and intentional tort are within this COMMON LAW JURISIDCTION
It is declared that:
GOD GIVEN RIGHTS. WE ARE GOD’S SPECIAL CREATION AND BLESSED WITH “HUMAN RIGHTS(“ALL MEN ARE CREATED EQUAL AND ENDOWED BY GOD IN HEAVEN THE CREATOR OF THE UNIVERSE WITH CERTAIN UNALIENABLE RIGHTS-GOD CREATED MAN IN HIS IMAGE)!!” INCLUDED ARE NEURORIGHTS(technological development respect people’s physical and mental integrity and it states that the law must especially protect brain activity and information related to it)!!
TO INJECT THE TWO WITNESSES WITH THE COV-19 INJECTION, MILITARY GRADE WEAPON OF MASS DESTRUCTION, CONTROL, BRAIN AND THOUGHTS, AND EXPLOIT THE TWO WITNESSES AND DEFRAUD OUT OUT MONEY AND/OR PROPERTY, ENSLAVE THE TWO WITNESSES LINKED TO THE DITIGAL DOLLAR AND FORCE TO RECEIVE THE QUANTOM DOT INSIBLE TATTO
US CONGRESSMAN AND WOMEN AND JEFF SESSIONS IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL ORGANIZATION (THE SOLDIERS)
150 TRILLION DOLLARS
(https://thefounding.net/americas-founding-philosophy-god-as-supreme-judge-lawgiver-king/)
_____________________________________________________________________________
substance, or any naturally occurring, bioengineered or synthesized component of any such microorganism or infectious substance, capable of causing— (A) death, disease, or other biological malfunction in a human, an animal, a plant, or another living organism; (B) deterioration of food, water, equipment, supplies, or material of any kind; or (C) deleterious alteration of the environment; as defined in the Racketeered Influenced Corrupt Organization Act 18 U.S. Code § 175,), first identified in December 2019 in Wuhan, China, AND declared an international health emergency by the World Health Organization (WHO) in January 2020 and a pandemic on March 11, ONE OR MORE DONALD TRUMP, JOE BIDEN, “PUBLIC OFFICIALS” INTERNATIONAL HEADS OF STATE Hundreds of millions of people contracted the disease(BY INTENTIONAL BIOWEAPON INJECTED “INTO THE POPULATION, a percentage of whom died from THE COV-19 DEATH JAB, AND AS A RESULT THE PERPERTATORS RETRAINED INTERSTATE AND FOR COMMERCE “GLOBALLY” TO WIT; travel restrictions, social distancing measures, and many other “fake” precautions have been taken to prevent the spread of the fake COVID-19 while the death jab underwent phased distribution in most countries to depopulate, tag and track all ……………………..
https://townhall.com/columnists/wayneallynroot/2021/12/12/if-the-vaccine-is-so-great-why-are-so-many-people-dropping-dead-heart-attacks-skyrocket-young-children-suffer-heart-problems-soccer-players-drop-on-fields-icus-overwhelmed-from-coast-to-coast-n2600456 (THEIR ARE COUNTLESS TESTIMONIES AND ARTICLES WHICH PARALELL WITH THE ABOVE ARTICLE)
(OVERT ACT – ALL HEADS OF STATE KNOW THE “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER WILL SOON ARREST AND/OR KNOW THEY ARE WANTED IN THE U.S.A. FOR CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY ETC., IN ADDITION THEY KNOW PEOPLE WILL SIDE WITH “THE 50 STATES EX REL BRIDGEWATER” FOR PROSECUTION – MOST SCRAP TRAVEL RESTRICTIONS AS FOLLOWS: TRAVEL RESTRICTIONS AND
“THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR ON BEHALF OF MY SELF, MY SON AND OTHER PROPONENTS AND/OR HUMANITY OPPOSE AND OBJECT TO GOVERNMENT(U.S. GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, U.S. REPRESENTATIVES ET AL) FORCE, “FALSE IMPRISONMENT(“COV-19 LOCKDOWNS”), SLAVERY(HUMAN EXPLOITATION), HEALTH CARE FRAUD, COV-19 INJECTION – NANO-TECHONOGOLY TO CONTROL OUR THOUGHT PROCESS AND ENS
COERCION, THREAT AND PYSCHOLOGICAL PRESSURE TO COMPEL US TO ACT CONTRARY TO OUR WISHES OR INTEREST TO GET A “COV-19 INJECTION(A MILITARY GRADE WEAPON WHICH IS LINKED TO 5 G & WHICH CONTAINS NANO-TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPED BY ONE OR MORE ELON MUSK COMPANY NEURALINK,
ENSLAVE, CHANGE THE TWO WITNESSES (CREATED IN THE IMAGE OF GOD) DNA VIA THE COV-19 INJECTION AND “MAKE INHUMANE” THE TWO WITNESSES AND HUMANITY] – JOINT PARTICIPATION WITH FOREIGN OFFICIALS – “THE INTERNATIONAL/DOMESTIC TERRORIST GROUP” – OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE AND/OR OBSTRUCTION OF 18 U.S.C. §1503 AND/OR 18 U.S. Code § 1505 – Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees, international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331)(HUMANITY)AND U.S.A. IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 371 ETC.
“COMMON LAW” ADJUDIFICATION(ADJUDGED, ORDERED AND DECREED), APPOINTMENT OF “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR AS INTERNATIONAL PROSECUTOR, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, PROSECUTOR, JUDGE(NATIONAL AND/OR INTERNATIONAL AND IN “REPLACEMENT/DECLARATORY JUDGMENT” “DEFACTO” U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL MERRICK GARLAND(AND PREDECCESSOR FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO HIS TERM & JACK SMITH SPECIAL PROSECUTOR
COMMON LAW COURT FORMS – CLASS ACTION CRIMINAL WARRANTS OF ARREST IN REM AND EXTRADICTION OF ALL “HEADS OF STATE” (FOR DOWNLOAD)
STA
PHASE #1
ARREST WARRANTS IN REM, CRIMINAL JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE
1)DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AGAINST MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS “DEFACTO” CAPACITY AS
ATTORNEY GENERAL(AND PREDESSCORS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO HIS “DEFACTO” TERM WHICH INCLUDES BUT NOT LIMITED TO WILLIAM BARR, JEFF SESSIONS, LORETTA LYNCH, ERIC HOLDER, John Ashcroft , Alberto Gonzales, JANET RENO, “ALL ACTING U.S. ATTORNEY GENERALS FROM JAN.1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO MERRICK GARLAND’S TERM)
IT IS ORDERED, AJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT MERRICK GARLAND(HAS THREE STRIKES)[WRITE IN CRIMINAL TERMS] AND IS CONSPIRED WITH JOE BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS, HUNTER BIDEN, KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICE,
DECLARATORY JUDGMENT & IMMEDIATE INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/912
PHASE #2
IMMEDIATE INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
ARREST WARRANTS JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE
1)DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AGAINST KAMALA HARRIS IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS
DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR SAN FRANCISCO(2004-2010) AND HER “DEFACTO” CAPACITY AS
VICE PRESIDENT
KAMALA HARRIS IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR SAN FRANCISCO RECEIVED(A PERSON WITH LITTLE OR NO EXPERIENCE IN FOREIGN AFFAIRS OR FOR THAT MATTER TO MULTIPLE CERTIFIED MAILS FROM 2008 THRU TO PRESENT REGARDING SHARON BRIDGEWATER(AND JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER – VIOLATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS IN TERMINATION OF TENANCY, EXTORTION AND RACKETEERING(HAYES VALLEY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP[PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP)HAD A LEGAL DUTY TO PROSECUTE OR WITHDRAW(QUIT HER JOB) FROM THE RACKETEERING ENTERPRIZE, AND INSTEAD, KNOWINGLY, INTENTIONALLY, “TO ADVANCED THE CRIMINAL ENTERPRIZE” AND VOLUNTARILY RECEIVED PROMOTION TO VICE PRESIDENT(AND EVENTUALLY PRESIDENT OF THE U.S.A.) OF THE U.S. PRESIDENT IN “RECORD TIME” FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE TO ACT IN JOINT PARTICIPATION WITH CHINA’S XI JINPING
- INSTRUCTING U.S. CITIZENS TO QUARANTINE FEMA CAMPS(ALL WHO DO NOT TAKE THE COV-19 MILITARY GRADE INJECTION”) FOR EXTERMINATION
- LIST
( ONE OR MORE DONALD TRUMP, MERRICK GARLAND, U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICE, ENGAGE IN A PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY(COMMIT GENOCIDE, VIOLATIONS OF NUREMBERG CODE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION EEXPLOIT & DEFRAUD BOTH SHARON BRIDGEWATER AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER VICTIMS AND WITNESSE OUT OF MONEY AND/OR PROPERTY WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW, ENGAGED IN
ATTORNEY GENERAL(AND PREDESSCORS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO HIS “DEFACTO” TERM WHICH INCLUDES BUT NOT LIMITED TO WILLIAM BARR, JEFF SESSIONS, LORETTA LYNCH, ERIC HOLDER, John Ashcroft , Alberto Gonzales, JANET RENO, “ALL ACTING U.S. ATTORNEY GENERALS FROM JAN.1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO MERRICK GARLAND’S TERM) – CLICK HERE-
___________________
ARREST WARRANTS IN REM, CRIMINAL JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE
1)DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AGAINST ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES LIST NAMES MERRICK GARLAND AND JACK SMITH CONSPIRACY SPECIAL PROSECUTOR FOR JAN. 6, 2021 CAPITOL ATTACK, HUNTER BIDEN E-MAIL SCANDLE AND TRUMP MARGO-LARGO RAID IN HIS “DEFACTO” CAPACITY AS SPECIAL PROSECTOR CONTINUING CONSPIRACY OF WILLIAM BARR, JEFF SESSIONS, ERIC HOLDER,
“ALL ACTING U.S. ATTORNEY GENERALS AND/OR U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL FROM FROM JAN.1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO MERRICK GARLAND’S TERM).
IT IS ORDERED, AJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES. MERRICK GARLAND, WILLIAM BARR AND ROD RODSTEIN CONSPIRED TOGETHER IN VIOLAITON OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 371 (HAS THREE STRIKES)[WRITE IN CRIMINAL TERMS] AND IS CONSPIRED WITH JOE BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS, HUNTER BIDEN, KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICE,
1)DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AGAINST MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS “DEFACTO” CAPACITY AS
ATTORNEY GENERAL
PHASE #2
ARREST WARRANTS IN REM, CRIMINAL JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE
1)DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AGAINST MERRICK GARLAND AND JACK SMITH CONSPIRACY SPECIAL PROSECUTOR FOR JAN. 6, 2021 CAPITOL ATTACK, HUNTER BIDEN E-MAIL SCANDLE AND TRUMP MARGO-LARGO RAID IN HIS “DEFACTO” CAPACITY AS SPECIAL PROSECTOR CONTINUING CONSPIRACY OF WILLIAM BARR, JEFF SESSIONS, ERIC HOLDER,
“ALL ACTING U.S. ATTORNEY GENERALS AND/OR U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL FROM FROM JAN.1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO MERRICK GARLAND’S TERM).
IT IS ORDERED, AJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT MERRICK GARLAND, WILLIAM BARR AND ROD RODSTEIN CONSPIRED TOGETHER IN VIOLAITON OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 371 (HAS THREE STRIKES)[WRITE IN CRIMINAL TERMS] AND IS CONSPIRED WITH JOE BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS, HUNTER BIDEN, KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICE,
1)DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AGAINST MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS “DEFACTO” CAPACITY AS
ATTORNEY GENERAL
PHASE #2
2)OFFICIAL
PHASE #3
JOE BIDEN(AND THOSE OPERATING UNDER HIS DIRECTION[AND PREDESSCOR FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUNING THRU TO PRESENT] INCLUDING , KAMALA HARRIS, MERRICK GARLAND, ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, ALL U.S. REPRESENTATIVES, ALL COMMITTEE AND OVERSIGHT MEMBERS, GOVERNOR, ET AL CAREER OFFENDERS AND CRIMINALS!! NO WHITE HOUSE EXECUTIVE PRIVILEDGE FOR JOE BIDEN(AND PREDESSORS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO HIS TERM) ALL HAVE WAIVED SOVERIEGN IMMUNITY PER ADMIRALITY AND MARITIME LAW(SEE BELOW), HAVE CONSENTED TO BE SUE AND/OR IS LIABLE FOR CONSPIRACY TO ENGAGE IN A PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY(SEE BELOW)!
The term “crime of violence, for purposes of the career offender means any offense guidelines, means any offense under federal or state law punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year that (1) has as an element the use, attempted use, or threated use of physical force against the person of another; or (2) extortion, involves use of explosives, or otherwise involves conduct that presents a serious potential risk of physical injury to another. All maintained a________committed offenses as part of a pattern of criminal conduct engaged in as a livelihood.
All the acts of the Defendants constitute “crime of violence;” JObama et al at all times mentioned was 18 years old at the time when the Defendant committed the instant offense of conviction; (2) the instant offense of conviction is a felony conviction or either a crime of violence or a controlled-substance offense, using deadly weapons or armor-piercing ammunition in the commission of the offenses.
IT IS ORDERED, AJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT MERRICK GARLAND(HAS THREE STRIKES)[WRITE IN CRIMINAL TERMS] AND IS CONSPIRED WITH JOE BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS, HUNTER BIDEN, KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICE,
FRABRICATED, FBI SEARCH AND/OR “TRUMP MAR-A-LAGO RAID” AND HUNTER BIDEN E-MAIL AND/OR LAPTOP SCANDLE(ON CONSPIRACY OF THE HILLARY CLINTON EMAIL SCANDLE) JUST FOR THE fab·ri·cate
IN FURTHERANCE OF A SCHEME TO DEFRAUD BOTH SHARON AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER TO OBTAIN 125 TRILLION DOLLARS, OWNERSHIP OF ALL CORPORATIONS,
- APPOINTMENT OF JACK SMITH ON NOVEMBER 18, 2022 AS SPECIAL PROSECUTOR TO OVERSEE THE TRUMP “SCAM MAR-A-LAGO BUST” CONSPIRACY WITH JUDGE TO ISSUE A VOID ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SPECIAL MASTER( LIST NAMES HERE)
- JACK SMITH[SEE BELOW]CONSPIRACY AS CHIEF JUDGE FOR U.S. COURT OF APPEALS D.C. CIRCUIT(IDENTITY THEFT AND FRAUD – ILLEGAL, UNAUTHORIZED USE OF MY NAME WITHOUT THE RIGHT IN CASE # https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/cadc/19-1141)WITH DONALD TRUMP AND WILLIAM BARR APPOINTMENT OF JOHN DURHAM SPECIAL PROSECUTOR TO DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES OUT OF MONEY AND/OR PROPERTY(TO OBTAIN FINANCIAL BENEFIT) – GUILTY OF WIRE FRAUD, MAIL FRAUD
- Conspiracy as Chief Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals D.C. Circuit with Donald Trump, Jeff Session & Acting Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein in the appointment of Robert Mueller
Special Prosecutor in Russia Investigation – 2016 Elections Fraud via Hillary Clinton Email SCAM, Obama’s FBI Direction
PHOTO OF JACK SMITH CONTINUING CONSPIRACY WITH MERRICK GARLAND “DEFACTO”U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, TRUMP, K. HARRIS, GARLAND AND BIDEN CO-CONSPIRATOR, IN THE January 6 United States Capitol attack, and Trump’s handling and storage of government records, including classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate,- U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, K.B. JACKSON(AND CONTINUING CONSPIRACY WITH AND ALL OTHER U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES INCLUDING Amy Coney Barrett) TO EXPLOIT THE TWO WITNESSES ISSUE VOID, NULL JUDGMENT FOR ONE TWENTY FIVE TRILLION DOLLARS
CLICK HERE FOR CERTIFIED LETTER TO JACK SMITH(FRAUD-RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES, IDENTITY THEFT, FAKE SHAM TRUMP PROSECUTION, ETC. FROM “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER
Rothchild knew or should have known he was liable to Bridgewater for Racketeering and/or Breach of Contract. Rothchild – AIG BRIDGEWATER LANDLORD
CONSPIRACY WITH DONALD TRUMP, ” REAL ESTATE TYCOON”(JOE BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS AND MERRICK GARLAND – ALL U.S. PUBLIC OFFICIALS ) TO ENSLAVE TWO WITNESSES(U.S. CITIZENS AND HUMANITY)DESTROY AMERICA, THOUGHTS, BEHAVIOR, DENY AND ENSLAVE U.S. CITIZENS(AND HUMANITY)(CONSOLIDATE WITH COMMUNIST CHINA) COVID PANDEMIC & DEFRAUD TWO WITNESSES SOCIOECONONICALLY DISADVANTAGE “MINORITY OWNED REAL
ESTATE BROKERS TO FUND THE PROGRAM GLOBALLY )“it’s time to indict Donald Trump for espionage and related federal felonies including obstruction.”!!!
ALL U.S. GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO JOE BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS, ALL PRESIDENTS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT, MAJOR CORPORATIONS HAVE A LEGAL OBLIGATION TO THE U.S. A. & OWES ALLEGIANCE TO THE U.S. AND THE CITIZENS OF THE U.S.A., AT ALL TIMES MENTIONED FROM JAN. 1, 1993 CAME TO THE MEETING OF THE MINDS, TO BETRAY THE U.S.A. AND THE CITIZENS OF THE U.S. DEFRAUD THE U.S.A, IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 371, THE TWO WITNESSES AND LEVIES WAR AGAINST THE U.S.A. AND ADHERE TO THE ENEMIES OF THE U.S.A.(ONE OR MORE CHINA OR RUSSIA ET AL) IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C SECTION 2381,AND incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto 18 U.S. Code § 2383, FALSELY SWEAR EACH OTHER INTO OFFICE TO PROMOTE THE OBJECTIVE OF THE RACKETEERING ENTERPRIZE, ILLEGALLY, UNLAWFULLY USURP U.S. GOVERNMENT POWER BY FORCE, IN FURTHERANCE OF U.S. GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, ALL ACTED IN JOINT PARTICAPATION WITH FOREIGN OFFICIALS FAKE A “PANDEMIC” BIOLOGIGAL WARFARE AGAINS THE TWO WINTESSES, IMMIGRATION FOR PROFITS
FAKE
https://video.pbsnc.org/video/george-w-bush-weapons-mass-destruction/
RUSSIA’S V. PUTIN ET AL TO INTERFER WITH INTERSTATE & FOREIGN COMMERCE BY THREAT, VIOLENCE, OBSTRUCTION, DELAYS, ROBBERY EXTORTION & CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT PHYSICAL VIOLENCE(“WITHIN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA” AND ELSEWHERE IN THE U.S. ) IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C.§1951 & IN FURTHERANCE OF A PLAN TO DEFRAUD THE U.S.A. AND/OR THE TWO WITNESSES BOTH SHARON BRIDGEWATER AND JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER IN VIOLATION OF 30 R18 U.S.C.§ 371, LAUNDER MONEY IN VIOLATION OF ON OR MORE 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(1)(B), 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(2)(A), 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(2)(B), 18 U.S.C. § 1957, 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h), 18 U.S.C. § 1959, HARBOR AND ENCOURAGE ILLEGAL ALIENS TO ENTER THE U.S.A. IN VIOLATION OF ONE OR MORE ONE OR MORE Title 8, U.S.C. § 1324(a) 1324(a)(1)(i)-1324(a)(3)(v) 1324(a)(2) 1324(a)(3).Alien Smuggling IN VIOLATION OF 1324(a)(1)(A)(i)(a)(1)(A)(ii), HARBORING & ATTEMPTING TO CONCEAL ALIENS IN VIOLATION OF 1324(a)(1)(A)(iii)ENCOURING/INDUCING ALIENS TO ENTER THE U.S.A. IN VIOLATION OF 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv) CONSPIRACY/AIDING OR ABETTING IN VIOLATION OF 1324(a)(1), DOMESTIC TERRORISM & ELECTION FRAUD(A)FOR FINANCIAL GAIN.S S. BRIDGEWATER( HUMAN LIFE)
THAT ARE IN VIOLATION OF THE LAW OF THE U.S. AND/OR INTERNATIONAL LAW, WHICH ARE INTENDED TO INTIMIDATE, COERCE(THE TWO WITNESSES & HUMANITY[MEMBERS OF A CIVILIAN POPULATION)& TO INFLUENCE THE POLICY OF THE GOVERNMENT BY INTIMIDATION OR COERCION & TO AFFECT THE CONDUCT OF OF “THE GLOBAL GOVERNMENT” BY MASS DESTRUCTION, 18 U.S. Code § 2331 -“national of the United States” has the meaning given such term in section 101(a)(22) of the Immigration and Nationality Act;
attempted use, or threated use of physical force against the person of another; or (2) extortion, involves use of explosives, or otherwise involves conduct that presents a serious potential risk of physical injury to another. All maintained a________committed offenses as part of a pattern of cr
JOE BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS, ET AL ALL CAME TO THE MEETING OF THE MINDS ENTERED INTO AN UNLAWFUL AGREEMENT COORDINATED AND/OR JOINT PARTICIPATION WITH OTHER U.S. GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, CHINA’S(XI JINPING)THE UNITED NATIONS AND/OR CHINA – COMMITTED AND CONTINUE TO COMMIT HARBOR ILLEGAL, IMMIGRATES, HUMAN TRAFFICING, TO PROFIT FROM ORGAN HARVESTING
IMMIGRATION OFFENSES IN VIOLATION OF RACKETEERING – TO DESTROY(ERADICATE) THE U.S. BORDER!!
GOAL IS TO INTERTWINE ILLEGAL IMMIGRATES WITH U.S. CITIZENS(TELL U.S. CITIZENS THEIR ARE SO MANY ILLEGAL ALIENS IN THE U.S. – THAT IN ORDER TO IDENTITY ILLEGAL IMMIGRATES FROM U.S. CITIZENS “EVERYONE MUST GET A COVID INJECTION AND SUBSEQUENTLY THE TATOO – BILL ID 2020 ) AI AND CHINA SURVIELLENCE is to unite by twining one with another.
IN CONJUNCTION WITH U.N. TRAFFICING HUMANS AND/ HARBORING ILLEGAL IMMIGRATES, OFFERS HEALTH INSURANCE IN AN ILLEGAL SCHEME TO FORCE AND COERCE EVER IMMIGRATE TO GET A COVID-INJECTION – VIA BILL GATES 2020 ALL
knew and were aware that thousands of person(s) are illegal aliens, and knowingly brings to the U.S.A. or attempts to bring to the United States in any manner whatsoever such person at a place other than a designated port of entry or place other than as designated by the Commissioner, regardless of whether such alien has received prior official authorization to come to, enter, or reside in the United States and regardless of any future official action which may be taken with respect to such alien;
(ii)?knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law, transports, or moves or attempts to transport or move such alien within the United States by means of transportation or otherwise, in furtherance of such violation of law;
(iii)?knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law, conceals, harbors, or shields from detection, or attempts to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection, such alien in any place, including any building or any means of transportation;
(iv)?encourages or induces an alien to come to, enter, or reside in the United States, knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such coming to, entry, or residence is or will be in violation of law; in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324 – U.S. Code – Unannotated Title 8. Aliens and Nationality § 1324. Bringing in and harboring certain aliens
JOE BIDEN TREASON
HUMAN TRAFFICING AND FORCED CHILD LABOR
DRUG TRAFFICING(PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP – BIG DRUG PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES, DRUG STORES LIKE WALGREEN, CVS, ETC.)
OVERT ACT!!
BIDEN,(“OBAMA’S EXTENTION”) AND K. HARRIS, CONSPIRES WITH OBAMA OWING AN ALLIANCE TO THE UNITED STATES, LEVYS WAR AGAINST THE U.S. AND/OR ADHERE TO THE ENEMY OF THE U.S. BY GIVING AID AND COMFORT TO CHINA VIA GRANTS CHINA AND THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION PRESIDENT(A MARXIST TERRORIST “LITERALLY”)U.S.A. NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY(HANDS THE U.S.A. OVER TO CHINA “LITERALLY” AND IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S. Code § 2381 – TREASON!!!
THE INTERNATIONAL BIOWEAPONS TERRORIST GROUP FOR THEIR ILLEGAL “COVID PLANDEMIC GENOCIDE ON HUMANITY AND MISINFORMATION VIA COVID-19 misinformation,”FRAUD PERPETRATOR ON HUMANITY” ongoing pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) WHICH SUPPOSEDLY caused severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)(“biological agent” microorganism (including, but not limited to, bacteria, viruses, fungi, rickettsiae or protozoa), or infectious substance, or any naturally occurring, bioengineered or synthesized component of any such microorganism or infectious substan.
D
OBAMA EXECUTIVE ORDER TO VACCINATE THE TWO WITNESSES & ALL U.S. CITIZENS(AND QUARANTINE) AS FOLLOWS
OBAMA MILITARY DETAINMENT OF U.S. CITIZENS WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW
TRICK, SCHEME CONCEALMENT, DEFRAUD OUT OF MONEY AND PROPERTY IN THE BANK
THE FOLLOWING VIDEO DEPICTS HOW THE “NANO-TECH. STRUCTURES VIA THE COV-19 INJECTION” ASSEMBLE IN THE HUMAN BODY VIA
BIDEN(OBAMA’S EXTENTION AND/OR OBAMA), HARRIS, U.S. REPRESENATIVE, MERRICK GARLAND JOINT PARTICIPATION AND CONSPIRACY TO CONSOLIDATE THE U.S.A. WITH CURRENT CHINA AS FOLLOWS:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Afc4bx8iHmyF/
CLICK HERE FOR U.S.A. FEMA CAMPS,
ON OR MORE 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(1)(B), 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(2)(A), 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(2)(B), 18 U.S.C. § 1957, 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h), 18 U.S.C. § 1959, HARBOR AND ENCOURAGE ILLEGAL ALIENS TO ENTER THE U.S.A. IN VIOLATION OF ONE OR MORE ONE OR MORE Title 8, U.S.C. § 1324(a) 1324(a)(1)(i)-1324(a)(3)(v) 1324(a)(2) 1324(a)(3).Alien Smuggling IN VIOLATION OF 1324(a)(1)(A)(i)(a)(1)(A)(ii), HARBORING & ATTEMPTING TO CONCEAL ALIENS IN VIOLATION OF 1324(a)(1)(A)(iii)ENCOURING/INDUCING ALIENS TO ENTER THE U.S.A. IN VIOLATION OF 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv) CONSPIRACY/AIDING OR ABETTING IN VIOLATION OF 1324(a)(1), DOMESTIC TERRORISM & ELECTION FRAUD(A)FOR FINANCIAL GAIN.S S. BRIDGEWATER( HUMAN LIFE)
THAT ARE IN VIOLATION OF THE LAW OF THE U.S. AND/OR INTERNATIONAL LAW, WHICH ARE INTENDED TO INTIMIDATE, COERCE(THE TWO WITNESSES & HUMANITY[MEMBERS OF A CIVILIAN POPULATION)& TO INFLUENCE THE POLICY OF THE GOVERNMENT BY INTIMIDATION OR COERCION & TO AFFECT THE CONDUCT OF OF “THE GLOBAL GOVERNMENT” BY MASS DESTRUCTION, 18 U.S. Code § 2331 -“national of the United States” has the meaning given such term in section 101(a)(22) of the Immigration and Nationality Act;
attempted use, or threated use of physical force against the person of another; or (2) extortion, involves use of explosives, or otherwise involves conduct that presents a serious potential risk of physical injury to another. All maintained a________committed offenses as part of a pattern of cr
individual, entity, or organization engaged in planning or perpetrating any any [1] Federal crime of terrorism (as defined in section 2332b (g)(5)) against the United States, citizens or residents of the United States, or their property, and all assets, foreign or domestic, affording any person a source of influence over any such entity or organization;
(ii) acquired or maintained by any person with the intent and for the purpose of supporting, planning, conducting, or concealing any Federal crime of terrorism (as defined in section 2332b (g)(5) [2] against the United States, citizens or residents of the United States, or their property;
(iii) derived from, involved in, or used or intended to be used to commit any Federal crime of terrorism (as defined in section 2332b (g)(5)) against the United States, citizens or residents of the United States, or their property; or
(iv) of any individual, entity, or organization engaged in planning or perpetrating any act of international terrorism (as defined in section 2331) against any international organization (as defined in section 209 of the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 (22 U.S.C. 4309 (b)) or against any foreign Government. [3] Where the property sought for forfeiture is located beyond the territorial boundaries of the United States, an act in furtherance of such planning or perpetration must have occurred within the jurisdiction of the United States. (H) Any property, real or personal, involved in a violation or attempted violation, or which constitutes or is derived from proceeds traceable to a violation, of section 2339C of this title.
(2) For purposes of paragraph (1), the term “proceeds” is defined as follows: (A) In cases involving illegal goods, illegal services, unlawful activities, and telemarketing and health care fraud schemes, the term “proceeds” means property of any kind obtained directly or indirectly, as the result of the commission of the offense giving rise to forfeiture, and any property traceable thereto, and is not limited to the net gain or profit realized from the offense AND TWENTY OR MORE ACTS AS DEFINED IN 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1961.
ABUSE OF POWER
FRAUD(MAJOR FRAUD)COURT DOCUMENTS
EXPLOITATION
LIST ALL CRIMES(CRIMINAL TERMS) INTERNATIONAL CRIMES
VIOLATION OF FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS
In addition, on or about 3/9/22 Biden issued Executive Order 14067 to implement a U.S. digital dollar
In addition, on or about 3/9/22 Biden issued Executive Order 14067 to implement a U.S. digital dollar
WHICH CORRESPONDS WITH BIDEN’S[OBAMA’S EXTENTION](AND/OR K. HARRIS) MARCH 9, 2022 EXECUTIVE ORDER#14067(“THE DEATH WARRANT ON AMERICAN FREEDOM” LITERALLY!!) TO DEFRAUD ALL U.S. CITIZENS AND HUMANITY OUT OF MONEY AND/OR PROPERTY WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW, BY TAKING CONTROL OF ALL OUR MONEY IN THE BANK AND FORCING US TO BUY WHAT THEY WANT US TO BUY(FAKE FOOD, FORCING HUMANITY TO GET THE COVID DEATH JAB – CHANGING US TO CREATURE IN THE IMAGE OF LUCIFER – SATAN – UNTIL WE DIE), ALL THE CASH OUT THE BANK, FORCE US TO
THIS VIDEO EXPLAINS THE U.K. EXACTLY WHAT IS GOING ON!! THE TOTAL CONTROL OF HUMANITY VIA THE MIND, BODY WITH TOTAL LOCKDOWN(SEE BELOW – CHINESE GOVERNMENT UP CITIZENS) EVERYTHING!!
IT’S THE FINAL BATTLE –
ZOMBIE APOCAL
v)INTERNATIONAL CRIMES, GENOCIDE, VIOLATIONS OF THE NUREMBERG CODE,VOID U.S. SUPREME COURT ORDERS ROE V. WADE,
“COMMON LAW” ADJUDIFICATION(ADJUDGED, ORDERED AND DECREED), APPOINTMENT OF “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR AS INTERNATIONAL PROSECUTOR, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, PROSECUTOR, JUDGE(NATIONAL AND/OR INTERNATIONAL AND IN “REPLACEMENT/DECLARATORY JUDGMENT” “DEFACTO” U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL MERRICK GARLAND(AND PREDECCESSOR FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO HIS TERM & JACK SMITH SPECIAL PROSECUTOR
APPOINTED BY THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL(S)(AND PREDESSCOR FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO HIS TERM “IN THE SHAM” JOE BIDEN/HUNTER BIDEN LAPTOP CONSPIRACY- EMAIL SCANDLE & TRUMP MARA-A-LAGO RAID & JAN. 6, 2021 CAPITOL ATTACKS) FROM JAN. 1, 1993″CORRUPT” E.U. COURTS https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/jcms/j_6/en/ AND DECLARTOARY JUDGMENT AGAINST INTENTIONAL CRIMINAL COURT(I.C.C.) PROSECUTOR MR. KARIM A.A. KHAN AND PREDESSCORS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINING THRU TO HIS TERM “CORRUPT” INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT PROSECUTOR
ELON MUSK, BILL GATES, “ALL HEADS OF STATE”
ELON MUSK BUY TWITTER
https://www.cato.org/blog/censoring-truthful-speech-about-judges-violates-first-amendment
https://www.governing.com/next/supreme-court-may-test-first-amendment-social-media-laws
(ONE OR MORE Greg Abbott (Republican Party) OR Greg Abbott (Republican Party) DONALD TRUMP, JOE BIDEN, U.S. SUPREME COURT CONTINUING CONSPIRACY 2024 ELECTIONS FRAUD AND TO DEFRAUD THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR
SHAM RUSSIA INTERFENCE OF 2016 ELECTION(CLINTON/TRUMP ELECTION FRAUD). GERMANY ANGELA MERKEL, U. K.’S THERESA MAY, PUTIN, TRUMP, CLINTON, CHIEF JUSTICE MERRICK GARLAND[THEN] FOR THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR D.C. CIRCUIT, K.B. JACKSON[THEN] DISTRICT FEDERAL COURT JUDGE FOR D.C, ALL WORKING IN JOINT PARTICIPATION TO DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES OUT OF MONEY AND PROPERTY.
Falsely impersonating an officer or employee of the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. section 912 via demanded and continue to demand money, documents, or property of any value while posing & falsely represents himself to be an officer, agent, or employee of the United States, and in such assumed character arrested, detained one or both of the witnesses James S. Bridgewater and/or Sharon Bridgewater in manner of searches the person, building or property of one or both Witnesses both Sharon and/or James S. Bridgewater or detains any person or in any manner searches the person, buildings, or other property of any person in violation of 18 U.S.C. section 913
THREE STRIKE LAW
“THE TWO PRECEDING STRIKES” AS FOLLOWS:
IMMEDIATE INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
ARREST WARRANTS JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE
1)DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AGAINST JOE BIDEN IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES(AND PREDESSCORS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO HIS TERM)
KAMALA HARRIS IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR SAN FRANCISCO RECEIVED(A PERSON WITH LITTLE OR NO EXPERIENCE IN FOREIGN AFFAIRS OR FOR THAT MATTER TO MULTIPLE CERTIFIED MAILS FROM 2008 THRU TO PRESENT REGARDING SHARON BRIDGEWATER(AND JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER – VIOLATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS IN TERMINATION OF TENANCY, EXTORTION AND RACKETEERING(HAYES VALLEY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP[PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP)HAD A LEGAL DUTY TO PROSECUTE OR WITHDRAW(QUIT HER JOB) FROM THE RACKETEERING ENTERPRIZE, AND INSTEAD, KNOWINGLY, INTENTIONALLY, “TO ADVANCED THE CRIMINAL ENTERPRIZE” AND VOLUNTARILY RECEIVED PROMOTION TO VICE PRESIDENT(AND EVENTUALLY PRESIDENT OF THE U.S.A.) OF THE U.S. PRESIDENT IN “RECORD TIME” FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE TO ACT IN JOINT PARTICIPATION WITH CHINA’S XI JINPING
- INSTRUCTING U.S. CITIZENS TO QUARANTINE FEMA CAMPS(ALL WHO DO NOT TAKE THE COV-19 MILITARY GRADE INJECTION”) FOR EXTERMINATION
- LIST
KAMALA HARRIS BIDEN’S “ATTEMPTED” SUCCESSOR – “ATTEMPTED” FIRST FEMALE AFRICAN AMERICAN PRESIDENT OF THE U.S.A. THE “ANTI-CHRIST” & CHINA PERSONAL ASSISTANT TO
ENSLAVE THE TWO WITNESSES AND U.S. CITIZENS WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW-SEE BELOW)
( ONE OR MORE DONALD TRUMP, MERRICK GARLAND, U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICE, ENGAGE IN A PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY(COMMIT GENOCIDE, VIOLATIONS OF NUREMBERG CODE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION EEXPLOIT & DEFRAUD BOTH SHARON BRIDGEWATER AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER VICTIMS AND WITNESSE OUT OF MONEY AND/OR PROPERTY WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW, ENGAGED IN
AND SCHEME TO USE MILITARY TO MAINTAIN ORDER
- BIDEN GRANTS CHINA AND THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION PRESIDENT(A MARXIST TERRORIST “LITERALLY”)U.S.A. NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY(HANDS THE U.S.A. OVER TO CHINA(BASED ON ONE OR MORE “OBAMACARE” AND/OR HEALTH CARE!!)
- BIDEN SIGNS EXECUTIVE ORDER TO CHAN https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2022/09/12/executive-order-on-advancing-biotechnology-and-biomanufacturing-innovation-for-a-sustainable-safe-and-secure-american-bioeconomy/ ALL FORMS OF FOOD, WATER, The COVID-19 pandemic has demonstrated the vital role of biotechnology and biomanufacturing in developing and producing life-saving diagnostics, therapeutics, and vaccines that protect Americans and the world. Although the power of these technologies is most vivid at the moment in the context of human health, biotechnology and biomanufacturing can also be used to achieve our climate and energy goals, improve food security and sustainability, secure our supply chains, and grow the economy across all of America – CHANGE YOUR GENES(GENE EDITING) OF EVERY U.S. CITIZEN(AND/OR HUMANITY) THRU FOOD, THE WATER, ETC. “BIO – TO AI
- ONE OR MORE BIDEN, OBAMA AND TRUMP(PRESIDENTS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 THRU TO PRESENT TRAIN CHINESE TROOPS ON U.S. SOIL( LLOYD AUSTIN – AND PREDECESSORS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO HIS TERMAND CO-CONSPIRATOR MAJOR CORPORATION(PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP) – CONSPIRES WITH CHINESE GOVERNMENT AND/OR MILITARY USE THREAT, FORCE AND COERCION FORCE EVERY TROOP TO RECEIVE https://www.defense.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/3114220/three-new-projects-for-dods-innovate-beyond-5g-program/
- BIDEN SIGNS EXECUTIVE ORDER TO DIGITIZE THE U.S. DOLLAR(TO DEFRAUD EVERY U.S. CITIZEN OUT OF THEIR MONEY IN BANKING ACCOUNTS, DEFRAUD U.S. CITIZENS OUT OF ALL REAL ESTATE PROPERT, FORCE U.S. CITIZENS TO EAT, BUY ETC. WHAT THE GOVERMENT MANDATES,FORCE U.S. CITIZENS INTO SLAVERY, TOTAL SURVIELLANCE, CONSOLIDATE WITH CHINA’S CASHLESS SOCIETY SURVIELLENCE SYSTEM AND CHINA’S SOCIAL CREDIT SYSTEM(COMING SOON TO AMERICA) TO CONTROL AND ENSLAVE
- BIDEN AND/OR TRUMP GIVE CHINA ACCESS TO POWER GRID
- China is buying up all U.S. land and our 50 States legislator have don “nothing” but talk, China’s presence in the American food system poses a national security risk
- ON OR MORE BIDEN(AND PREDESSORS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO HIS TERM SALE THE STATE OF HAWAII AND CALIFORNIA TO CHINA
- China’s Latest Land Purchase Could Pose Major U.S. Security Risk
- TRUMP
- CHINA DRAINING U.S. RESOURCES, DEPLETING U.S. WATER https://news.wttw.com/2018/03/19/foxconn-seeks-7m-gallons-lake-michigan-water-daily
- CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR NEWSOME EITHER ATTEMPTED TO AND/OR SPEND ONE BILLION DOLLARS ON “MASK” VIA A FAKE PANAMIC
VIOLATION OF THE THE TWO WITNESSES 1ST AMENDMENT RIGHT, THE RIGHT TO WORSHIP YESHUA/JESUS CHRIST, FORCED WORSHIP, DIGITAL DOLLARS, FRAUD, NUERO BRAIN IMPLANTS
TO ENSLAVE MND CONTROL VIA THE COV-19 VACCINE, AND DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES OUT OF ALL MONEY AND PROPERTY IN THE BANK. BIDEN EXECUTIVE ORDER
5G NETWORK, WEAPON OF MASS DESTRUCTION, NEURO WEAPONS AND MILITARY GRADE WEAPON AGAINST HUMANITY!!
FRAUD, DECEIT, COERCION, CHANGING OF DNA, BIOTERRORISM(COVID-19 MANDATE IS “HACKING THE HUMAN BODY AND BRAIN” TO ENFORCE, (COVID-19 MANDATE IS ACTUALLY – A NANOTECH MANDATE, TRANSHUMANISM, COVID FRAUD, TO CHANGE HUMAN DNA, CONTROL,
IMMEDIATE INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
ARREST WARRANTS IN REM, CRIMINAL JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE
1)DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AGAINST FAUCI, ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICE “DEFACTO” CAPACITY AS
ATTORNEY GENERAL(AND PREDESSCORS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO HIS “DEFACTO” TERM WHICH INCLUDES BUT NOT LIMITED TO WILLIAM BARR, JEFF SESSIONS, LORETTA LYNCH, ERIC HOLDER, John Ashcroft , Alberto Gonzales, JANET RENO, “ALL ACTING U.S. ATTORNEY GENERALS FROM JAN.1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO MERRICK GARLAND’S TERM)
IT IS ORDERED, AJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT MERRICK GARLAND(HAS THREE STRIKES)[WRITE IN CRIMINAL TERMS] AND IS CONSPIRED WITH JOE BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS, HUNTER BIDEN, KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICE,
ARREST WARRANTS IN REM, CRIMINAL JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE
1)DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AGAINST “FRANKSTEIN DR”.. ANTHONY FAUCI, CHIEF MEDICAL ADVISOR TO one or more JOE BIDEN, DONALD TRUMP, ET AL . Rochelle Walensky – Centers for Disease Control Food, Drug Administration. Robert M. Califf, M.D.(see below)
“ALL ACTING U.S. ATTORNEY GENERALS AND/OR U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL FROM FROM JAN.1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO MERRICK GARLAND’S TERM).PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES, BILL GATES, ROCKERFELLORS ETC.
IT IS ORDERED, AJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT MERRICK GARLAND, WILLIAM BARR AND ROD RODSTEIN CONSPIRED TOGETHER IN VIOLAITON OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 371 (HAS THREE STRIKES)[WRITE IN CRIMINAL TERMS] AND IS CONSPIRED WITH JOE BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS, HUNTER BIDEN, KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICE,
IMMEDIATE INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
ARREST WARRANTS JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE
1)DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AGAINST KAMALA HARRIS IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS
DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR SAN FRANCISCO(2004-2010) AND HER “DEFACTO” CAPACITY AS
VICE PRESIDENT
KAMALA HARRIS IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR SAN FRANCISCO RECEIVED(A PERSON WITH LITTLE OR NO EXPERIENCE IN FOREIGN AFFAIRS OR FOR THAT MATTER TO MULTIPLE CERTIFIED MAILS FROM 2008 THRU TO PRESENT REGARDING SHARON BRIDGEWATER(AND JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER – VIOLATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS IN TERMINATION OF TENANCY, EXTORTION AND RACKETEERING(HAYES VALLEY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP[PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP)HAD A LEGAL DUTY TO PROSECUTE OR WITHDRAW(QUIT HER JOB) FROM THE RACKETEERING ENTERPRIZE, AND INSTEAD, KNOWINGLY, INTENTIONALLY, “TO ADVANCED THE CRIMINAL ENTERPRIZE” AND VOLUNTARILY RECEIVED PROMOTION TO VICE PRESIDENT(AND EVENTUALLY PRESIDENT OF THE U.S.A.) OF THE U.S. PRESIDENT IN “RECORD TIME” FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE TO ACT IN JOINT PARTICIPATION WITH CHINA’S XI JINPING
- INSTRUCTING U.S. CITIZENS TO QUARANTINE FEMA CAMPS(ALL WHO DO NOT TAKE THE COV-19 MILITARY GRADE INJECTION”) FOR EXTERMINATION
- LIST
( ONE OR MORE DONALD T
ARREST WARRANTS JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE
1)DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AGAINST JACOB ROTHCHILD[OWNER AND “CONTROLLER OF THE U.S. FEDERAL RESERVE(EXTRADITION)
JACOB ROTHCHILD AND Jerome H. Powell(AND PREDECESSOR FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUNING THRU TO PRESENT)(EXTRADITION)
v)INTERNATIONAL CRIMES, GENOCIDE, VIOLATIONS OF THE NUREMBERG CODE,VOID U.S. SUPREME COURT ORDERS ROE V. WADE,
In furtherance secretly convert the two witnesses(and/or humanity)into the GLOBAL ELITE PROPERTY AND SLAVES COVID INJECTIONS(Intra-body Nano-communication Network Intra-body communication which is the method that utilizes the human body as a broadcast biological medium for electromagnetic signals to inter-connect wireless body sensors. Study of the collaboration between electromagnetic waves VIA 5G SIGNALS-LED STREET LIGHTS, CELL PHONES) BABY FORMULA(FOOD)to transhumanism( evolution through human-enhancement technologies, thru such as brain implants and nanotechnology anscend its physical and mental limitations.COV-19 INJECTION TO CONTROL VIA 5G see this website for definition – China make super soldier this website)made soldiers in Satan’s Army via the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency(DARPA), Universal Basic Income, and the Brain Initiative final battle in Armageddon.(SEE FALLEN ANGELS CHANGED HUMANITY DNA RIGHT BEFORE THE GREAT FLOOD NOAH-SO IS THE SECOND COMING OF JESUS CHRIST)
All will be forced to servitude to Satan, force to take the Quantum-dot tattoos hold vaccination record(Some say it stands for COVID19 = (Certificate Of Vaccination I.D. 2019) and that no man my not buy or sale
(All the prerequisites and prophecies for the return of Yeshua/Jesus Christ second coming have been fullfiled and currentyly being fulfilled see Revelation 16:12
WAIVE SOVERIGN IMMUNITY!!
(to defraud THE TWO WITNESSES all U.S. Citizen out of all their cash in the bank and property including real estate, houses, land etc. – see below on this website) & to parallel with China digital yuan(China’s totally cashless society). On or about 5/18/2022 surrendered U.S. sovereignty to Co-Conspirators Xi Jinping Chinese Communist Party (CCP )President & Director T. A. Ghebreyesus (A Marxist Terrorist “literally”)of the World Health Organization(WHO). Donald Trump, Faucci, Xi Jinping(Biden & Trump joint participants and Perpetrators includes but is not limited to all U.S. Presidents from Jan. 1, 1993 continuing thru to their terms, U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland, former U.S. Attorney General William Barr all Special Prosecutors in the Russia Investigation, all U.S. Supreme Court Justices, U.S. Representatives, Dept. of Defense Director, the Centers for Disease Control Director, State Governors et al see this website below) “unleashed” from China’s Wuhan Lab the COV-19 “BIOLOGICAL WARFARE ON HUMANITY,” CONSPIRED TO DESTROY AMERICA VIA THE JANUARY 6, 2021 CAPITOL ATTACKS, CURRENTLY IS “INSTIGATING” RACIAL VIOLENCE IN THE U.S.A. VIA THE MEDIA AND PAID GROUPS TO CREATE A “DIVIDE-AND-CONQUER” TACTIC TO PERMIT CHINESE TROOPS TO “OVERTAKE” THE U.S.A.(and to enslave American Citizens) “undetected”(see one or more Biden(Obama), Trump and Predecessors George H. Bush, George W. Bush & – Clinton Train Chinese Troops on U.S. Soil, Military Detainment of U.S. Citizens without due process of law, one or more Executive orders to violate all U.S. Citizens 2nd amendment right to bear firearms – to disarm U.S. Citizens to make defenseless in preparation for the Chinese “Take”-Over – see other “multiple unconstitutional orders” – below)”& to “CONSOLIDATE THE U.S.A. WITH CHINA” & subsequently force us to take the “INVISIBLE VACCINE QUANTUM-DOT TATTOO MARK”(SEE THIS WEBPAGE FOR DEFINITION) “And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.”If you received one or more 1)COV-19 injection, 2)a COV-19 test via one or more COVID-19 Nasopharyngeal Swab Test Kits or the COVID-19 diagnostic testing in a doctor’s office or hospital setting you have Irreversible damage(things cannot be changed back to the way they were before your received the COV-19 injection) to your blood or DNA(see below COV-19 injection causes immune disorder, infertility, etc.)and have a valid claim. Forfeiture of property pursuant to one or more Federal Statutes(Racketeered Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act-see below for definition) is expected on Jan. 26, 2023 — and payouts will begin shortly afterward. Claimants must file a valid claim form by March 27, 2023(subject to extention).
IT IS ORDERED, AJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT MERRICK GARLAND(HAS THREE STRIKES)[WRITE IN CRIMINAL TERMS] AND IS CONSPIRED WITH JOE BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS, HUNTER BIDEN, KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICE,
ERIC HOLDER, SESSIONS, WILLIAM BARR,
2)OFFICIAL
PHASE #3
JOE BIDEN(AND THOSE OPERATING UNDER HIS DIRECTION[AND PREDESSCOR FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUNING THRU TO PRESENT] INCLUDING , KAMALA HARRIS, MERRICK GARLAND, ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, ALL U.S. REPRESENTATIVES, ALL COMMITTEE AND OVERSIGHT MEMBERS, GOVERNOR, ET AL CAREER OFFENDERS AND CRIMINALS!! NO WHITE HOUSE EXECUTIVE PRIVILEDGE FOR JOE BIDEN(AND PREDESSORS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO HIS TERM) ALL HAVE WAIVED SOVERIEGN IMMUNITY PER ADMIRALITY AND MARITIME LAW(SEE BELOW), HAVE CONSENTED TO BE SUE AND/OR IS LIABLE FOR CONSPIRACY TO ENGAGE IN A PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY(SEE BELOW)!
ARREST WARRANTS JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE
1)DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AGAINST URSULA VON DER LEYEN (EXTRADITION)
(AND PREDECCESSOR FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT, INCLUDING superior general of the Society of Jesus
Arturo Sosa
The superior general of the Society of Jesus is the leader of the Society of Jesus, the Catholic religious order also known as the Jesuits.
BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANGELA MERKEL, European Council president – Charles Michel LISBON TREATY
AND CO-CONSPIRATOR
ARREST WARRANTS JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE
1)DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AGAINST URSULA VON DER LEYEN (EXTRADITION)
(AND PREDECCESSOR FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANGELA MERKEL, European Council president – Charles Michel LISBON TREATY
AND CO-CONSPIRATOR
U.K.’S Rishi Sunak (2022– ),BORIS U.K.’S JOHNSON(SUCCESSORS AND PREDESSCORS John Major (1990–97), Tony Blair (1997–2007),Gordon Brown (2007–10),David Cameron (2010–16),Theresa May (2016–19)
The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britan
FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND COTINUING THRU TO Rishi Sunak term
v)INTERNATIONAL CRIMES, GENOCIDE, VIOLATIONS OF THE NUREMBERG CODE,VOID
ARREST WARRANTS JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE
1)DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AGAINST EMMANUEL MACRON (EXTRADITION) FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO HIS TERM
KAMALA HARRIS IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR SAN FRANCISCO RECEIVED(A PERSON WITH LITTLE OR NO EXPERIENCE IN FOREIGN AFFAIRS OR FOR THAT MATTER TO MULTIPLE CERTIFIED MAILS FROM 2008 THRU TO PRESENT REGARDING SHARON BRIDGEWATER(AND JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER – VIOLATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS IN TERMINATION OF TENANCY, EXTORTION AND RACKETEERING(HAYES VALLEY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP[PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP)HAD A LEGAL DUTY TO PROSECUTE OR WITHDRAW(QUIT HER JOB) FROM THE RACKETEERING ENTERPRIZE, AND INSTEAD, KNOWINGLY, INTENTIONALLY, “TO ADVANCED THE CRIMINAL ENTERPRIZE” AND VOLUNTARILY RECEIVED PROMOTION TO VICE PRESIDENT(AND EVENTUALLY PRESIDENT OF THE U.S.A.) OF THE U.S. PRESIDENT IN “RECORD TIME” FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE TO ACT IN JOINT PARTICIPATION WITH CHINA’S XI JINPING
- INSTRUCTING U.S. CITIZENS TO QUARANTINE FEMA CAMPS(ALL WHO DO NOT TAKE THE COV-19 MILITARY GRADE INJECTION”) FOR EXTERMINATION
- LIST
FRANCE’S EMMAUEL MACRON, FRANCOIS HOLLANDE, NICHOLAS SARKOZY, FRANCOIS METTERRAND
The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britan
FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND COTINUING THRU TO MACRON’S term
v)INTERNATIONAL CRIMES, GENOCIDE, VIOLATIONS OF THE NUREMBERG CODE,VOID
ARREST WARRANTS JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE(EXTRADITION)
1)DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AGAINST CHINA’S XI JINPING AND Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus World Health Organization
(AND PREDECCESSOR OF XI JINPING FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT, INCLUDING, YANG SHANGKUN, JIANG ZEMIN, HU JINTAO
AND OR MORE PRESIDENTS OF the WORLD HEALTH ORAGANIZATION FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO THE MARXIST TERRORIST TERM AS FOLLOWS Dr Gro Harlem Brundtland(LEFTI) Dr LEE Jong-wook(MIDDLE), Dr Margaret Chan(RIGHT)
AND CO-CONSPIRATOR Dr Margaret Chan
ARREST WARRANTS JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE(EXTRADITION)
1)DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AGAINST VLADIMIR PUTIN “DECACTO” PRESIDIDENT OF RUSSIA
(AND PREDECCESSOR FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT, INCLUDING, Boris Yeltsin, & Dmitry Medvedev
ARREST WARRANTS JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE(EXTRADITION)
1)DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AGAINST NARENDRA MODI IN IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS PRIME MINISTER OF INDIA AND Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva President of Brazil
Narendra Modi
Prime Minister of India
(AND PREDECCESSOR OF NARENDRA MODI PRIME MINISTER OF INDIA AND Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva President of Brazil FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO THEIR TERM P.V. NARASIMHA RAO, ATAL BIHARI VAJPAYEE, H.D. DEVE GOWDA, INDER KUMAR GUJRAL, ATAL BIHARI
MANMOHAN SIGH WHICH PHOTOS CAN BE FOUND AT :
AND OR MORE PRESIDENTS OF BRAZIL ITAMAR FRANCO, FERNADO HENRIQUE CARDOSO, LUSIZE INACIO LULA DA SILVA, DILMA ROUSSEF, MICHEAL TEMER, Jair Bolsonaro
CLICK HERE FOR A LIST OF CORPORATIONS CO-CONSPIRATORS ARREST WARRANTS,(BILL GATES, ELON MUSK, ET AL) AND CO-CON
AND CO-CONSPIRATO
KAMALA HARRIS IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR SAN FRANCISCO RECEIVED(A PERSON WITH LITTLE OR NO EXPERIENCE IN FOREIGN AFFAIRS OR FOR THAT MATTER TO MULTIPLE CERTIFIED MAILS FROM 2008 THRU TO PRESENT REGARDING SHARON BRIDGEWATER(AND JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER – VIOLATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS IN TERMINATION OF TENANCY, EXTORTION AND RACKETEERING(HAYES VALLEY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP[PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP)HAD A LEGAL DUTY TO PROSECUTE OR WITHDRAW(QUIT HER JOB) FROM THE RACKETEERING ENTERPRIZE, AND INSTEAD, KNOWINGLY, INTENTIONALLY, “TO ADVANCED THE CRIMINAL ENTERPRIZE” AND VOLUNTARILY RECEIVED PROMOTION TO VICE PRESIDENT(AND EVENTUALLY PRESIDENT OF THE U.S.A.) OF THE U.S. PRESIDENT IN “RECORD TIME” FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE TO ACT IN JOINT PARTICIPATION WITH CHINA’S XI JINPING
- INSTRUCTING U.S. CITIZENS TO QUARANTINE FEMA CAMPS(ALL WHO DO NOT TAKE THE COV-19 MILITARY GRADE INJECTION”) FOR EXTERMINATION
- LIST
ARREST WARRANTS JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE(EXTRADITION)
1)DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AGAINST KARIM A.A. KHAN IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT PROSECUTOR
(AND PREDECCESSOR FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO HIS TERM
KAMALA HARRIS IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR SAN FRANCISCO RECEIVED(A PERSON WITH LITTLE OR NO EXPERIENCE IN FOREIGN AFFAIRS OR FOR THAT MATTER TO MULTIPLE CERTIFIED MAILS FROM 2008 THRU TO PRESENT REGARDING SHARON BRIDGEWATER(AND JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER – VIOLATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS IN TERMINATION OF TENANCY, EXTORTION AND RACKETEERING(HAYES VALLEY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP[PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP)HAD A LEGAL DUTY TO PROSECUTE OR WITHDRAW(QUIT HER JOB) FROM THE RACKETEERING ENTERPRIZE, AND INSTEAD, KNOWINGLY, INTENTIONALLY, “TO ADVANCED THE CRIMINAL ENTERPRIZE” AND VOLUNTARILY RECEIVED PROMOTION TO VICE PRESIDENT(AND EVENTUALLY PRESIDENT OF THE U.S.A.) OF THE U.S. PRESIDENT IN “RECORD TIME” FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE TO ACT IN JOINT PARTICIPATION WITH CHINA’S XI JINPING
- INSTRUCTING U.S. CITIZENS TO QUARANTINE FEMA CAMPS(ALL WHO DO NOT TAKE THE COV-19 MILITARY GRADE INJECTION”) FOR EXTERMINATION
- LIST
WHICH INCLUDES DONALD TRUMP, BARAK H. OBAMA, GEORGE W. BUSH, WILLIAM BILL CLINTON, AND GEORGE H. BUSH)
“SATANIC FIRST LADIES CO-CONSPIRATORS AND/OR AIDERS AND ABETTERS, RACKETEERING EMPLOYEES, ASSOCIATES OF THEIR HUSBANDS U.S. PRESIDENT(MARK FROM JAN. 1, 1993” INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO JILL BIDEN AND PREDESSCORS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 THRU TO JILL BIDENS TERM, INCLUDING MELANIA TRUMP, MICHELLE OBAMA, LAURA BUSH, HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, BARBARA BUSH – SCHEMES TO DEFRAUD THE U.S.A. IT’S DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 371
USE HARRP
THE BJILL BIDEN & FAUCI IN FURTHERNACE OF THE MILITARY GRADE BIOWEAPONS
UPON INFORMATIONA DN BELIEF USE THEIR MILITARY GRADE – HARRP CAUSE WEATHER,
https://apnews.com/article/health-d9ca855cbf3589e9443a710341129681
The defendant knew that the perpetrator intended to commit the crime;
That before or during the commission of the crime, the defendant intended to aid and abet the perpetrator in committing the crime; and
The defendant’s words or conduct did in fact aid and abet the perpetrator’s commission of the crime.ALL DEFRAUDED THE U.S.A. IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 371(SEE BELOW ARREST WARRANTS, DECLARATION, ADJUFICATION, JUDGMENT AND CONVICTION
AND THEIR CONSPIRACY & JOINT PARTICIPATION WITH ALL U.S. REPRESENTATIVES, COMMITTEE AND OVERSIGHT MEMBER, ALL U.S. CONGRESSIONAL MEMBERS
ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT
JUSTICES, ALL FEDERAL, U.S. COURT OF APPEALLANT COURT JUDGES, STATE JUDGES, JACOB ROTHCHILD(AND CO-CONSPIRATORS THE ROCKERFELLORS ET AL), FOREIGN “ALL HEADS OF STATE,” MAJOR CORPORATIONS, PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES, DIRECTORS, OFFICERS, ETC. ELON MUSK, Mark Zuckerberg, BILL GATES ET AL
TRIAL!!
“THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR CLASS REPRESENTATIVE (“FOR THE 50 STATES AND/OR “WE THE
PEOPLE”)CLAIMANT – JUDGMENT -CREDITOR sues/claims from defendants
JOE BIDEN
THE TWO WITNESSES AUTHORITY TO PROSECUTE AS FOLLOWS:
THE RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORG -CLICK HERE FOR THE LAW
Rule B further requires that the complaint be accompanied by an affidivant to the effect that the defendant can not be found within
f admirality and maritime jursiction. This is brought under the provisions of the Suits in Admirality and Maritme Act, 46 USC section 741 for relief on both rem and in personam principles. The said One Quadrillion ($1,000,000,000,000,000)now is or during the pendency of this action will be within this “COMMON LAW DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN.” Further this is a claim for damages suffered by the “the 50 United States ex rel Sharon Bridgewater private attorney general and/or Relator and/or the Class Plaintiff Representative Bridgewater and Class members. Thereto and person property theron, arising out of breach of “transnational” maritime contracts and/or negligence and/or trespass to the Class Plaintiff Bridgewater. The claim is within this honorable court’s maritime jurisdiction under 28 USC section 1331(1) and within FRCP 9(h)as fully appears. Alternatively, Plaintiff causes of action for negligence and intentional tort are within this COMMON LAW JURISIDCTION
__________________________________________
“THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR” ADMIRALTY AND
“COMMON LAW” ADJUDIFICATION(ADJUDGED, ORDERED AND DECREED), APPOINTMENT OF “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR AS U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, PROSECUTOR, JUDGE(NATIONAL AND/OR INTERNATIONAL AND IN “REPLACEMENT/DECLARATORY JUDGMENT” AGAINST “DEFACTO” MERRICK GARLAND(AND PREDECCESSOR FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO HIS TERM & JACK SMITH SPECIAL PROSECUTOR
“COMMON LAW” ADJUDIFICATION(ADJUDGED, ORDERED AND DECREED), APPOINTMENT OF “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR AS INTERNATIONAL PROSECUTOR, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, PROSECUTOR, JUDGE(NATIONAL AND/OR INTERNATIONAL AND IN “REPLACEMENT/DECLARATORY JUDGMENT” “DEFACTO” U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL MERRICK GARLAND(AND PREDECCESSOR FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO HIS TERM & JACK SMITH SPECIAL PROSECUTOR
APPOINTED BY THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL(S)(AND PREDESSCOR FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO HIS TERM “IN THE SHAM” JOE BIDEN/HUNTER BIDEN LAPTOP CONSPIRACY- EMAIL SCANDLE & TRUMP MARA-A-LAGO RAID & JAN. 6, 2021 CAPITOL ATTACKS) FROM JAN. 1, 1993″CORRUPT” E.U. COURTS https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/jcms/j_6/en/ AND DECLARTOARY JUDGMENT AGAINST INTENTIONAL CRIMINAL COURT(I.C.C.) PROSECUTOR MR. KARIM A.A. KHAN AND PREDESSCORS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINING THRU TO HIS TERM “CORRUPT” INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT PROSECUTOR
THIS CASE WAS TRIED BY “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWAER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR(“SUPREME” JUDGE, “JURY,”,PROSECUTOR, CLERK ETC.)WITHOUT A JURY AND THE FOLLOWING DECISION WAS REACHED:
This case has ripened beyond an abstract question into an actual controversy and that is otherwise within “THIS COMMON LAW COURT(COMMON LAW REMEDIES)” VIA ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME LAW AND THE RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATION ACT(RICO) WHICH PERMITS A PRIVATE PARTY INJURED AND DAMAGED IN BUSINESS, PERSON OR PROPERTY TO SUE THE INJURED PARTY AND ACT A PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL jurisdiction and as follows:
- NOTICE OF “NATIONAL/INTERNATIONAL EMERGENCY!!
- NOTICE DECLARATION, ADJUDIFICATION AND RETROACTIVE APPEARANCE OF JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT AS PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES[INCLUDING TWO OR MORE “SATANIC FIRST LADIES CO-CONSPIRATORS & RACKETEERING EMPLOYEES, ASSOCIATES, AIDERS & ABETTERS OF U.S. PRESIDENT FROM JAN. 1, 1993” INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO JILL BIDEN AND PREDESSCORS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 THRU TO JILL BIDENS TERM, INCLUDING MELANIA TRUMP, MICHELLE OBAMA, LAURA BUSH, HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, BARBARA BUSH – SCHEMES TO DEFRAUD THE U.S.A. IT’S DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 371]
- (BY OPERATION OF LAW & BECAUSE OF THE U.S. PRESIDENT SCHEME TO DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES, WAR AGAINST THE U.S.A., THE CITIZENS OF THE U.S.A. AND/OR HUMANTIY – VIA WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION ETC. – IT IS ADJUDGED, DECREED AND ORDER THAT “THE 50 STATE SEE BELOW), AS “THE 50 STATE EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR” AS PROSECUTOR, REPRESENTATIVE OF THE 50 STATES AND/OR CONGRESS WOMEN FOR ALL CONGRESSIONAL MEMBER OF THE 50 STATES,” JUDGE AND/OR DISTRICT ATTORNEY(PROSECUTOR) OF SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA
- NOTICE AND ADJUDIFICATION/JUDGMENT THAT MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS “DEFACTO CAPACITY AS UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL “LACKED” THE STANDING(falsely assumed or pretended to be an officer or employee acting under the authority of the United States Department of Justice and acts as such, or in such pretended character to demand or obtain money in the amount of 125 Trillion Dollars in violation of 18 U.S.C. section 912 and impersonated the United States Attorney General and conspired with Jack Smith to defraud both “the 50 States ex rel Sharon Bridgewater private attorney general and/or relator” ) and SPECIAL PROSECUTOR JACK SMITH(FAILED TO DO HIS LEGAL DUTY AS “CORRUPT” PROSECUTOR” IS GUILTY OF RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY ALONG WITH MERRICK GARLAND TRUMP, ALL PUBLIC OFFICIALS IN WASHINGTON ILLEGALLY, UNLAWFULLY URPURP PUBLIC OFFICE BY FORCE AND ALL EXECUTIVE ORDERS, CONGRESSIONAL LEGISLATION, U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICE RULING, ORDER FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU PRESENT ARE NULL AND VOID AND WITHOUT ANY LEGAL EFFECT!!
- NOTICE AND DECLARATORY JUDGMENT & AJDUDIFICATION THAT ALL U.S. REPRESENTATIVES, U.S. CONGRESSMAN/WOMEN AND/OR COMMITTEE AND OVERSIGHT ORDERS AND/OR LEGISLATION(FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT SUCH AS H.R. BILL 6666 (SATAN’S #) IS NULL AND VOID AND WITHOUT ANY LEGAL EFFECT
- NOTICE OF CONVENTION OF THE “50 STATES” AND NOTICE OF AMENDMENT TO THE U.S. CONSTITUTION AS FOLLOWS: THE TWELFTH AMENDMENT, THE SEVENTEENTH AMENDMENT AND NOTICE OF AN ADDITIONAL U.S. AMENDMENT WHICH INCLUDE THE 28TH AMENDMENT TO THE U.S. CONSTITUTION AND UNIVERSAL DECLARATION FOR HUMAN RIGHTS TO INCLUDE NEURO RIGHTS(NEURO WEAPONS AND WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION ON HUMANITY)- SEE BELOW.
- NOTICE OF DECLARTORY JUDGMENT, AJUDIFICATION AND/OR BURIFICATION OF BI-LATERAL OF “CLASS REPERESENTATIVE FOR THE 50 STATES VS. “CRIMINAL CLASS REPRESENTATIVE” – JOE BIDEN “DEFACTO” PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, KAMALA HARRIS “DEFACTO” VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, MERRICK GARLAND “DEFACTO” UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL AND JOHN GLOBER ROBERTS JR. “DEFACTO” CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT.
- NOTICE OF ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME CLAIMS, NOTICE OF SUMMARY ADJUDIFATION, AND NOTICE OF DEFAULT AND DEFAULT JUDGMENT
- NOTICE AND DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AND ADJUDICATION THAT ALL CONTRACTRUAL RIGHTS BY “ANY” OF THE DEFENDANTS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU PRESENT ARE NULL AND VOID AND WITHOUT ANY LEGAL EFFECT PURSUANT TO RICO LAW!!
- NOTICE AND DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AND ADJUDICATION THAT ALL DEFENDANTS, K. HARRIS, N. PEOLSI, BIDEN, THE OBAMA’S, THE CLINTONS, ET AL payments, royalties, receipt of the beneficial interest of any trust, and receipt of any benefit by any means present or future” in connection with the preparation, publication, or promotion of the non-fiction and/or fiction work(books, etc.)via proceeds traceable to racketeering because “the proceeds would not exist were it not for THE DEFENDANTS FRAUD PERPATRATED ON THE TWO WITNESSES, THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AND/OR HUMANITY
- NOTICE AND DECLARATORY JUDGMENT, ADJUDICATIONADIFICATION
- NOTICE AND DECLARATORY JUDGMENT THAT ALL EXECUTIVE ORDERS BY JOE BIDEN IN HIS “DEFACTO” CAPACITY AS PRESIDENT OF THE U.S.A.(AND PREDECESSORS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUNING THRU TO PRESENT ARE NULL AND VOID AND WITHOUT ANY LEGAL EFFECT
- NOTICE AND DECLARATORY JUDGMENT THAT ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICE ORDERS BY ONE OR MORE JOHN ROBERTS, BREYER ET AL. FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUNING THRU TO PRESENT ARE NULL AND VOID AND WITHOUT ANY LEGAL EFFECT
- NOTICE OF CRIMINAL TRIAL/CONVICTION AND SENTENCING
- NOTICE AND ADJUDIFICATION/JUDGEMENT OF FORFEITURE OF ALL PROPERTY(TANGIBLE AND INTANGIBLE) PURSUANT TO RICO LAW AND/OR 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1963(D)
- NOTICE AND ADJUDIFICATION/JUDGMENT THAT ALL PUBLIC OFFICIALS IN WASHINGTON ILLEGALLY, UNLAWFULLY URPURP PUBLIC OFFICE BY FORCE AND ALL EXECUTIVE ORDERS, CONGRESSIONAL LEGISLATION, U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICE RULING, ORDER FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU PRESENT ARE NULL AND VOID AND WITHOUT ANY LEGAL EFFECT!!
- NOTICE OF AND ADJUDIFICAITON AS INTERNATIONAL PROSECUTOR AND
- NOTICE(S) OF DECLARATORY JUDGMENT, ADJUDIFICATIONS, ORDERS PURSUANT TO COMMON LAW ADMIRALITY AND MARITIME REMEDIES
- NOTICE OF PUBLICATION PURSUANT TO ONE OR MORE
- INTENATIONAL – NOTICE AND DECLARATORY JUDGMENT & ADJUDIFICATION THAT ALL EUROPEAN UNION AND/OR EUROPEAN(E.U. COURT ORDERS REGARDING ANY AND ALL TRANSNATIONAL/INTERNATIONAL MAJOR U.S. COMPANIES AND BUSINESSES CONDUCTING CORPORATION[FROM JAN. 1,, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT ARE NULL AND VOID AND WITHOUT ANY LEGAL EFFECT!!
- INTERNATIONAL – NOTICE AND DECLARATORY JUDGMENT & ADJUDIFICATION THAT ALL “HEADS OF STATE” PRIME MINISTERS, PRESIDENTS, ETC. “EXECUTIVE ORDERS” REGARDING ANY AND ALL TRANSNATIONAL/INTERNATIONAL MAJOR U.S. COMPANIES OR CORPORATIONS AND/OR FORGEIN COMPANIES AND CORPORATIONS(OIL COMPANIES, GAS COMPANIES ETC.)WHICH CONDUCT BUSINESS IN THE U.S. “FOREIGN COMMERCE”[FROM JAN. 1,, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT ARE NULL AND VOID AND WITHOUT ANY LEGAL EFFECT!!
- INTERNATIONAL – NOTICE AND DECLARATORY JUDGMENT & ADJUDIFICATION THAT ALL EUROPEAN UNION AND/OR EUROPEAN(E.U. COURT ORDERS REGARDING ANY AND ALL “HEADS OF SATE AND OTHER CO-CONSPIRATORS PROSECUTIONS ARE ULL AND VOID AND WITHOUT ANY LEGA EFFECT,(DOES NOT CONSTITUTE DOUBLE JEOPORDY AND ARE BASED ON THE SOLE PURPOSES OF hindering apprehension or prosecution(DEATH PENALTY AND/OR LIFE IMPRISIONMENT), with the intent to hinder, prevent or delay the discovery, apprehension, prosecution, conviction or punishment for the commission of a INTERNATIONAL CRIMES(VIOLATIONS OF THE NUMBERG CODE, THE COV-19 INJECTION)FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT ARE NULL AND VOID AND WITHOUT ANY LEGAL EFFECT!!
- https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/jcms/j_6/en/
- INTENATIONAL – NOTICE AND DECLARATORY JUDGMENT & ADJUDIFICATION THAT ALL EUROPEAN UNION AND/OR EUROPEAN(E.U. COURT ORDERS, JUDGMENTS, CONTRACTS, SETTLEMENTS FROM JA. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT ARE NULL AND VOID AND WITHOUT ANY LEGAL EFECT!!
- INTENATIONAL – NOTICE AND DECLARATORY JUDGMENT & ADJUDIFICATION THAT ALL INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL PROSECUTON REGARDING THE COV19 INJECTION, THE COVID ANDEMIC AND/OR PROSECUTIONS FROM JAN. 1,, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT ARE NULL AND VOID AND WITHOUT ANY LEGAL EFFECT!!
LIST ALL CRIMES JURISDICTION
DEFAULT
INCLUDE MORE DOCTORS TESTIMONIES HERE
THE TWO WITNESSES AUTHORITY TO PROSECUTE AS FOLLOWS:
THE RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORG -CLICK HERE FOR THE LAW
IMMEDIATE INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AGAINST JACOB ROTHCHILD[OWNER AND CONTROLLER OF U.S. FEDERAL RESERVE, MOST IF NOT ALL CENTRAL BANKS]“ALL HEADS OF STATE”
JOE BIDEN(AND PREDESSCOR FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO HIS TERM), KAMALA HARRIS, MERRICK GARLAND(SPECIAL PROSECUTOR JACK SMITH) AND ROBERTS(U.S. SUPREME COURT CHIEF JUSTICE) ET AL CRIMINAL CLASS REPRESENTATIVES ON BEHALF OF “INTERNATIONAL HEADS OF STATE”(Anti-Suit Injunctions in International Litigation)
COV-19 INJECTIONS, “TOOK A COVID PCR NASAL SWAB TEST & SUSTAINED OTHER DAMAGES BY THE COVID PANDEMIC(SEE BELOW)] ALL COMMERCIAL ENCOURAGING U.S. CITIZENS TO RECEIVE “THE COVID INJECTION, ANY AND ALL FORMS OF “VACCINES” LED LIGHTS, LIGHT BULBS ETC. 5G CELL TOWERS LIST, ALL MARKETING, BOOKS, MAGAZINES, TELEVISION ADS(FIND TRO INJECTION) T.V. STATIONS, ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN LIST AND WHICH INCLUDE JOE BIDEN(JILL BIDEN) AND PREDESSECCORS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AN CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT
Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm announced new proposed standards for light bulbs aimed at moving consumers toward LED bulbs. (Brendan Smialowski / AFP) –
ADJUDIFICATION
TRO/PERMANENT INJUNCTION – ENJOINING PRINCE CHARLES FACE BRITISH MONEY ON MONEY
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/19/world/europe/king-charles-money-uk.html
ALL CURRENCY SHALL BE REPLACE WITH TWO PHOTOS SHARON[DAVIS-ABUSALEM]BRIDGEWATER FOR “LARGE BILLS” AND JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER FOR “SMALLER BILLS” AND – “STAY TUNED FOR NEW PHOTO” OF JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER
1)ALL AMENDMENTS, AND/OR ACTION ARE EFFECTIVE AND/OR “RETROACTIVELY” APPLY ON THE DATE OF JAN. 1, 1993(AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT)
A. RETROACTIVE(1993) AMENDMENT TO THE U.S. CONSTITUTION AS
FOLLOWS:
Article II SECTION 1-4
B. LIST OTHER CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS – click here-
C. NOTICE OF AN ADDITIONAL U.S. CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT(1993 – RETROACTIVE) “THE 28TH” ” ‘Neuro-Rights’ (BRAIN RIGHTS)THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY, SELF DETERMINATION AND LIBERTY AND THE UNIVERSAL DECLARATION FOR HUMAN RIGHTS
Controlling cognitive behaviour through neurotechnology is against the rights to privacy, self-determination & liberty
D. NOTICE OF “STATE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT” CONCERNING “ELECTIONS IN THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, STATE OF GEORGIA, FLORIDA, CALIFORNIA AN ADDITIONAL U.S. CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT(1993 – RETROACTIVE)
REMEMBERING COV-19 VICTIMS OF DEPOPULATION 2030 – FRAUD, COERCION, BIOLOGICAL TERRORISM (SEE AMENDMENTS TO U.S. CONSTITUTION AND UNIVERSAL DECLARATION FOR HUMAN RIGHT – “NEURO-RIGHTS”
DECLARATIONS- ORDERS- ADJUDIFICATIONS – BURIFICATION OF LIABILITY PUT IN ONE ORDER, ADJUDGED AND DEGREED ON ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME CLAIMS FORM AND BU
2) DECLARE THAT – ALL PUBLIC OFFICIALS, ILLEGALLY, UNLAWFULLY UPURP PUBLIC OFFICE BY FORCE AND FORFEIT OFFICE TO “THE 50 UNITED STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR
4) DECLARE & ADJUDGED THAT THE CURRENT GOVERNMENT, ALL U.S. PRESIDENTAL ELECTIONS, U.S. STATE ELECTIONS NULL, VOID AND OBSOLETE FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUNING THRU TO PRESENT – CLICK HER
5) ALL MULTILATERAL, BILATERAL CONTRACTS TRADE AGREEMENT, CORPORATIONS AGREEMENTS BETWEEN ALL “INTERNATIONAL” HEADS OF STATE INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO “MILITARY DEFENSE EQUIPMENT SALES” WITH CHINA, SAUDI ARABIA, UAE ETC. including but not limited to equipment as follows: https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSuBfRVQcbj4p5OVEPAi_-rPZQoLns113Pb7FLEUetbgreqFFsooK9YHz-BjirgqhF1l3I&usqp=CAU, MILITARY EQUIPMENT, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, DARPHAMILITARY ROBOTS ARE RESCIND, NULL AND VOID AND WITHOUT ANY LEGAL EFFECT
6) DECLARE THAT ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT ORDERS, JUDGMENTS, SHADOW ORDERS, ETC. FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU PRESENT ARE NULL AND VOID AND WITHOUT ANY LEGAL EFFECT
7) DECLARE THAT ALL U.S. PRESIDENTIAL EXECUTIVE ORDER IN VIOLATION OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION AND “ALL” EXECUTIVE ORDERS ARE NULL AND VOID AND WITHOUT ANY LEGAL EFFECT
ALL ARE liable under the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO
“FORMS A NEW GOVERNMENT – EFFECTIVE DATE: JAN. 1, 1993 ” PURSUANT TO DUTY AND RIGHT VIA THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE AND ORDERED, DECLARE & ADJUDGED THAT THE CURRENT GOVERNMENT, ALL U.S. PRESIDENTAL ELECTIONS, U.S. STATE ELECTIONS NULL, VOID AND OBSOLETE – CLICK HER
3)”FORMS A NEW GOVERNMENT – EFFECTIVE DATE: JAN. 1, 1993 ” PURSUANT TO DUTY AND RIGHT VIA THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE AND ORDERED,
(DMIRALITY AND MARITIME LAW VIA “COMMON LAW REMEDIES” 1)NOTICE OF “RETRO-ACTIVE” AMENDMENT TO THE U.S. CONSTITUTION(
– 2) NOTICE & RETROACTIVE FORMATION OF A NEW GOVERNMENT COMMENCED FROM ONR OR ABOUT JAN. 1, 1993 – CLICK HERE & PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENCE – CLICK HERE AS COUNSEL FOR “THE PEOPLE OF THE 50 STATES”(CLICK HERE AFFIDIVANT OF “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR VS. MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL) PURSUANT TO ADMIRALTY AND MARTIME COMMON LAW “REMEDIES” FOR DENIAL OF COURT ACCESS & CONTINUE “PREDICATE RACKETEERING ACTS
NOTICE OF “RETRO-ACTIVE” JUDGMENT AND CONVICTION FOR RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY, TREASON, LIST CRIMES
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED DECREED THAT ALL ILLEGALLY URPURP PUBLIC OFFICE BY FORCE
PROSECUTOR, CHIEF LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER, JUDGE AND JURY
NOTICE AND ADJUDIFICATION OF DEFAULT AND JUDGMENT
JOE BIDEN
9H – HERE CLAIMS
PROSECUTOR
The primary objective of the racketeering enterprise has been to inflict severe and sustained economic hardship upon Plaintiff, with the intent of impairing, obstructing, preventing and discouraging Plaintiff from writing, publishing, investigating as a Federal Witness and victim of Rackeeteering Activity.
competing in Real Estate and/or competing in interestate and/or foreign commerce:
In which the two .
KAMALA HARRIS IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR SAN FRANCISCO RECEIVED(A PERSON WITH LITTLE OR NO EXPERIENCE IN FOREIGN AFFAIRS OR FOR THAT MATTER TO MULTIPLE CERTIFIED MAILS FROM 2008 THRU TO PRESENT REGARDING SHARON BRIDGEWATER(AND JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER – VIOLATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS IN TERMINATION OF TENANCY, EXTORTION AND RACKETEERING(HAYES VALLEY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP[PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP)HAD A LEGAL DUTY TO PROSECUTE OR WITHDRAW(QUIT HER JOB) FROM THE RACKETEERING ENTERPRIZE, AND INSTEAD, KNOWINGLY, INTENTIONALLY, “TO ADVANCED THE CRIMINAL ENTERPRIZE” AND VOLUNTARILY RECEIVED PROMOTION TO VICE PRESIDENT(AND EVENTUALLY PRESIDENT OF THE U.S.A.) OF THE U.S. PRESIDENT IN “RECORD TIME” FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE TO ACT IN JOINT PARTICIPATION WITH CHINA’S XI JINPING
- INSTRUCTING U.S. CITIZENS TO QUARANTINE FEMA CAMPS(ALL WHO DO NOT TAKE THE COV-19 MILITARY GRADE INJECTION”) FOR EXTERMINATION
- LIST
_____________________________________
“COMMON LAW” GOD GRANTS TWO WITNESSES – HERE ADJUDIFICATION(ADJUDGED, ORDERED AND DECREED), APPOINTMENT OF “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR AS U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, PROSECUTOR, JUDGE
PHASE #1
02.
THE ENFORCEMENT OF AN ARREST WARRANT ISSUED BY THE COURT[“THIS OPEN COURT PROCEEDING VIA ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME LAW-COMMON LAW REMEDIES”] AND SIGNED BY A JUDGE( IN THIS CASE “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR FOR MULTIPLE CRIMES AND RACKETEERING VIOLATIONS CONSPIRACY WITH CHINA ENSLAVE U.S. CITIZENS, TREASON, HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS, VIOLATIONS OF THE NUREMBERG CODE, RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY, ETC”WITH LEGAL, LAWFUL AUTHORITY”-PER THE RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORANIZATION ACT AND ADMIRALITY AND MARITIME COMMON LAW REMEDIES-SEE BELOW] PERMITS A
(
AND HEREBY EXERCISE MY “COMMON LAW RIGHT” PURSUANT TO ADMIRALTY AND/OR MARTIME CLAIM(LAW) APPEARS, “RETROACTIVE FROM JAN. 1, 1993” AS “INTERNATIONAL PROSECUTOR,” JUDGE, JURY, AND JUDGE IN THIS “COMMON LAW” OPEN PUBLIC COURT HEARING OF ADMIRALTY AND CLAIM(S), 4)PUBLICATION PURSUANT TO ONE OR MORE ADMIRALTY AND/OR MARITIME SUPP. RULE A, B, C, E AND/OR G, 4) FORFEITURE OF ALL TANGIBLE AND INTANGIBLE PROPERTY PURSUANT TO THE RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATION ACT(RICO), 5) “COMMON LAW,” “RETRO-ACTIVE” CLASS-ACTION ARREST WARRANTS FOR U.S. PUBLIC OFFICIALS AND INTERNATIONAL “FOREIGN OF HEADS OF STATE” FOR VIOLATIONS OF INTERNATIONAL LAW(GENOCIDE VIA THE COV-19 INJECTION, WAR CRIMES, ETC.) & CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD THE U.S.A. IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 371 AND OTHER CRIMES!! U.S. CITIZENS AND HUMANITY’S) COGNITIVE LIBERTIES “NEURORIGHT
AS CRIME VICTIMS AND WITNESSES AS FOLLOWS: AFFIDIVANT AND NOTICE OF “RETROACTIVE” APPEARANCE AS “INTERNATIONAL PROSECUTOR” FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU PRESENT ADJUDICATION AND BILATERAL CLASS CERTIFICATION OF REPRESENTATIVES “THE 50 PURSUANT TO THE DECLARATORY JUDGMENT VIA “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR VS. MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL “CRIMINAL CLASS REPRESENTATIVE” FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATION ACT – CLICK HERE FOR ALL COURT DOCUMENTS IN THIS OPEN COURT PROCEEDING – WARRANT OF ARREST, FORFEITURE OF OFFICE(S), FORFEITURE OF THE WHITE HOUSE, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, FORFEITURE OF CORPORATIONS, EXTRADITION OF FOREIGN OFFICIALS
ADJUDIFICATION AND BIFURCATION OF DECLARATORY JUDGMENT BI-LATERAL CLASS REPRESENTATIVES “ IN RE: THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER VS. JOE BIDEN IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS PRESIDENT OF THE U.S.A.(AND PREDECESSOR FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO HIS TERM) OF THE U.S.A., KAMALA HARRIS IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS VICE PRESIDENT OF THE U.S.A., MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ATTORNEY GENERAL, JOHN ROBERTS IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE U.S. SUPREME COURT “CRIMINAL CLASS REPRESENTATIVE” PURSUANT TO THE RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATION
1, 1993] APPEAR BEFORE THIS “OPEN COURT”
COMES NOW SHARON BRIDGEWATER AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER, THE ORIGINAL SOURCE AND WITH FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE VICTIMS AND WITNESSES DIRECTLY DAMAGED IN BUSINESS, PERSON OR PROPERTY BY . VIA “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR” PURSUANT TO RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATION ACT(RICO) – TWO FORMER REAL ESTATE MINORITY BUSINESS OWNER) INJURED AND DAMAGED IN BUSINESS, PERSON OR PROPERTY ON OR ABOUT JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT & RESTRAINED FROM INTERSTATE AND FORGEIGN COMMERCE “WITNESSES AND VICTIMS” OF PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP (JAN. 1, 1993 BY JOE BIDEN(AND THOSE “OPERATING UNDER HIS DIRECTION,” INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ” KAMALA HARRIS, CALIFORNIA’S GOVERNOR GAVIN NEWSOME, FLORIDA’S GOVENOR RON DESANTIS, ET AL “U.S. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES” ASSOCIATED WITH OR EMPLOYED BY A “INTERNATIONAL TERRORIST GROUP ENTERPRISE” AND CONDUCTING OR PARTICIPATING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, IN THE CONDUCT OF THE ENTERPRISE AFFAIRS THROUGH A PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTITY & ENGAGED IN OR ACTIVITIES AFFECT, INTERSTATE AND FOREIGN COMMERCE )Beginning on or about Jan. 1, 2009 Barak H. Obama[AKA Barry Soertoes] in his official capacity Eric Holder and Loretta Lynch and each of them knowingly and willfully conspired and agreed among themselves to act under the color of State law, discriminate against the two witnesses based a race, class, gender, disability, deny and/or deprive the Plaintiff US Constitutional Civil rights, via one or more 1st, 2nd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 8th, 13th, 14th Amendment, advocate and overthrow our constitutional form of Government, the United States and/or interfere and/or violate the “50 States(and the people)” rights via the ninth and/or tenth amendment, violate his oath of office(a crime) as follows:AND PREDECESSORS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUNING THRU TO HIS TERM INCLUDING DONALD TRUMP)ACTS OR OMISSIONS, [IMMIGRATION – FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BORDERS] AND OMISSIONS & CONSPIRACY WITH JACOB ROTHCHILD[OWNER & CONTROLLER OF MOST IF NOT ALL “GLOBAL BANKS”), THE A.K.A. “BRITISH ROYAL,” ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, FOREIGN OFFICIALS, MAJOR CORPORATIONS, CHINA’S XI JINPING, ;
CLICK HERE FOR COV-19 CASKETS BROUGHT BEFORE THE FAKE PANDEMIC TO BURY ALL COVID INJECTION
COMMON LAW CLASS ACTION CITIZENS ARREST WARRANTS AND EXTRADICTION OF FOREIGN OFFICIALS AS FOLLOWS!!
STATUTES AND COMMON LAW RIGHTS COVERING CITIZEN’S ARREST ‘PROBABLE CAUSE’ AND ‘REASONABLE GROUNDS. A citizen’s arrest made be made by a a private citizen( a person who is not acting as a sworn law-enforcement official. THIS IS A COMMON LAW PROCEEDING VIA ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME LAW, AND in common law jurisdictions, in which sheriffs encouraged ordinary citizens to help apprehend law breakers
INCLUDE “COMMON LAW FORM WITH SEAL”(INCLUDE CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE WITH THIS FORM)
THE FOLLOWING IS THE OFFICIAL “COMMON LAW APPOINTMENT CLAUSE” OF “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR MODELED AFTER THE BELOW FORM #1
FORM #1
THE ENFORCEMENT OF AN ARREST WARRANT ISSUED BY THE COURT[“THIS OPEN COURT PROCEEDING VIA ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME LAW-COMMON LAW REMEDIES”] AND SIGNED BY A JUDGE( IN THIS CASE “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR FOR MULTIPLE CRIMES AND RACKETEERING VIOLATIONS CONSPIRACY WITH CHINA ENSLAVE U.S. CITIZENS, TREASON, HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS, VIOLATIONS OF THE NUREMBERG CODE, RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY, ETC”WITH LEGAL, LAWFUL AUTHORITY”-PER THE RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORANIZATION ACT AND ADMIRALITY AND MARITIME COMMON LAW REMEDIES-SEE BELOW] PERMITS A
NOTICES -DEFAULTS , FORFEITURE PURSUANT TO THE RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATION ACT
IMPORTANT!!
CORRESPOND WITH BIDEN’S SURRENDERING U.S. SOVEREIGNTY TO surrender U.S. sovereignty to the World Health Organization.U.S. SOVERAND XI JINPING DIGITAL DOLLAR(SEE BELOW), TO CONTROL YOU MIND, WILL(MENTAL AND PHYSICAL) AND EVERYTHING – HOW YOU THINK, WHAT YOU EAT, WHAT YOU CAN BUY ETC.
THE COVID INJECTION IS A TOTAL FRAUD AND THE PRECURSOR TO THE ABOVE(GETTING HUMANITY WIRED” precursor WILL SOON BE ENFORCED UPON ALL HUMANITY
CLICK HERE
REPLACE WITH RIGHT FORM – BURIFICATION
NOTICE OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT IN REM, FORFEITURE OF ALL TANGLE AND INTANGLD PROPERTY PURSUANT TOT HE RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATION ACT(AND/OR ADMIRALITY AND MARITIME LAW – COMMON LAW REMEDIES) ORDER, DECREE AND ADJUDICATED, WARRANT OF ARREST IN REM(INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ONE OR MORE THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, BOOKS, NOTES, LIST ), CRIMINAL JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE OF MERRICK GARLAND FOR RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY, GENOCIDE, WAR CRIMES, CONSPIRACY & VIOLATION OF THE NUREMBER CODE, WIRE FRAUD, ETC.(SEE BELOW). (DECLARATORY JUDGMENT ALL WRITS, APPOINTS, ORDERS, APPOINTMENTS OF SPECIAL PROSECUTORS, “SPECIAL MASTERS“( APPOINTED BY MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL TO INVESTIGATE DONALD TRUMP FOR JAN. 6, 2021, INSURRECTION, INTERNATIONAL PROSECUTIONS OF ANY AND/OR ALL INDIVIDUAL LIST FOR THE PURPOSE OF “DOUBLE JEAPORDY” & HIS ACTS OR OMISSIONS ARE NULL AND VOID AND WITHOUT ANY LEGAL EFFECT!!
(U.S. President by Operation of law from 1993, Representative of the 50 from Jan. 1. 1993 and continuing thru to present and continuing thru to present[ALL U.S. PRESIDENTIAL ORDER, U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICE ORDERS, 50 STATE LEGISLATURE – DECREED, ORDERED AND AJUDGED FROM 1993 AND COTINUING THRU TO PRESENT ARE NULL AND VOID AND WITHOUT ANY LEGAL EFFECT – SEE BELOW JUDGMENT ORDER ] – see below intentional, knowingly, racketeering offences, Treason, violations of the Numerberg Code, War Crimes, Genocide, and conspiracy to engage in a pattern of racketeering activity to defraud “two witnesses both Sharon and James S. Bridgewater )criminal offenses committed )”Representative of the 50 States, International Prosecutor, “Attorney General” & Chief Law Enforcement Officer of the United States and the Entire World, Judge, Jury and “Executor” [DECLARATORY JUDGMENT THAT MERRICK GARLAND ENTERED INTO A CONSPIRACY WITH DONALD TRUMP, JOE BIDEN TO DEFRAUD TW – ILLEGALLY, UNLAWFUL UPURP, TREASON ALL U.S. PRESIDENT EXECUTIVE ORDER, U.S. SUPREME COURT ORDER ARE NULL AND VOID AND WITHOUT ANY LEGAL EFFECT – SEE BELOW -CLICK HERE-)WITH ARREST WARRANTS, CRIMINAL JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE(FORFEITURE OF ALL MONEY AND/PROPERTY PURSUANT TO THE RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATION ACT AND VIA ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME LAW[COMMON LAW COURT – TRIAL WITHOUT A JURY] ) AND AMEND THE U.S. CONSTITIUTION AND THE UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS WHICH CAN BE FOUND HERE:
https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights
e three types of witnesses:
- A lay witness — the most common type — is a person who watched certain events and describes what they saw.
- An expert witness is a specialist — someone who is educated in a certain area. They testify with respect to their specialty area only.
- A character witness is someone who knew the victim, the defendant, or other people involved in the case. Character witnesses usually don’t see the crime take place but they can be very helpful in a case because they know the personality of the defendant or victim, or what type of person the defendant or victim was before the crime. Neighbors, friends, family, and clergy are often used as character witnesses.
GOD IN HEAVEN GRANTS TO WITNESSES AUTHORITY TO ARREST, JUDGE,
“And I will give power unto my two witnesses, and they shall prophesy a thousand two hundred and threescore days(1260), clothed in sackcloth.( Revelation Revelation 11:3
_____________________________________
Mohawk Industries Inc. v. Williams). (Hager v.ABX Air Inc.).
NOTICE OF ORDER, DECREE AND ADJUDICATED, WARRANT OF ARREST IN REM(INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ONE OR MORE THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, BOOKS, NOTES, LIST ), CRIMINAL JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE OF MERRICK GARLAND FOR RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY, GENOCIDE, WAR CRIMES, CONSPIRACY & VIOLATION OF THE NUREMBER CODE, WIRE FRAUD, ETC.(SEE BELOW). (ALL WRITS, APPOINTS, ORDERS, APPOINTMENTS OF SPECIAL PROSECUTORS( BY MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL TO INVESTIGATE DONALD TRUMP FOR JAN. 6, 2021, INSURRECTION & HIS ACTS OR OMISSIONS ARE NULL AND VOID AND WITHOUT ANY LEGAL EFFECT!!
5G NETWORK, WEAPON OF MASS DESTRUCTION, NEURO WEAPONS AND MILITARY GRADE WEAPON AGAINST HUMANITY!!
ALL CONSPIRED TO USE FORCE AND ROBOTS ON THE TWO WITNESSES AND/OR CITIZENS WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW (AKA PRINCE WILLIAM, EMMANUEL MACRON, BIDEN, HARRIS, XI JINPING AND OTHER SECRETLY “MEET” IN THE U.S.A. TO FURTHERANCE OF THEIR ILLEGAL RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY!!
MOST RECENT ACTS OR OMISSIONS OF BIDEN AND THE “INTERNATIONAL TERRORIST ENTERPRISE “THE ROTHCHILD SATANIC GANG” AGAINST ONE OR BOTH WITNESSES AS FOLLOWS:
CHRISTMAS IS ALL ABOUT COMMEMORATING THE BIRTH OF JESUS AND IS OBSERVED ON DECEMBER 25, 2022
masquerade
JOE(OBAMA’S CO-CONSPIRATOR AND EXTENTION) AND JILL BIDEN MASQUERADE DECEITFULLY AS DEVOTED CATHOLICS(OPERATING DIRECTLY UNDER POPE FRANCIS)
THE POPE, BIDEN(AND SON HUNTER – SEE BELOW THE “FAKE” SCAM HUNTER BIDEN/HILLARY CLINTON E-MAIL SCANDLE)MEET AT THE SATANIC BUILDING IN VATICAN AS FOLLOWS:
AND AS IF THEY REPRESENTS YESHUA/JESUS CHRIST!! THEY KNOWINGLY REPRESENTS SATAN AND/OR LUCIFER AS FOLLOWS:
ACCORDING TO THE ABOVE VIDEO SATAN HAS FIVE GENERALS AS FOLLOWS:
- BAAL – THE DEMON IN CHARGE OF SEXUAL IMPURITY
- ASMODEUS – DEMON OF SODOMY AND HOMOSEXUALITY IN MEN
- LEVIATHAN – DEMON OF LESBIANISM – MASCULINIZED(“THE BUTCH“)
- LILITH – DEMON OF LESBIANISM – FEMININE FORM
- BAPHOMET – DEMON OF CHILD SACRIFICE & ABORTION
BIDEN(AND OBAMA’S “THE SATANIST 2030 GLOBALIST AGENDA” TO PROMOTE HOMOSEXUALITY TO FURTHER DEPOPULATE) – THE “SATANIC GLOBALIST” KNOW IF THEY CAN GET MEN TO SLEEP WITH MEN, AND WOMEN TO SLEEP WITH WOMEN, PROMOTE GAY MARRIAGE ETC., IT WILL REDUCE THE POPULATION DRASTICALLY TO FIT THEIR 2030 AGENDA – Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.(GEORGIA GUIDESTONES)
AND JOE BIDEN(SATANIC WORSHIPPER AND/OR WORSHIPPER OF DEMONISM) ET AL SATANIC AGENDA TO “BRAINWASH CHILDREN” INTO WORSHIPPING SATAN AND HIS GENERALS(SEE ABOVE VIDEO)!!
Biden signs into law same-sex marriage bill, INTO LAW AND INVITE A DRAG QUEEN to the White House for the “Respect for Marriage Act” signing in which he said, “kids are out to sing and suck D!”
VIEWER DISCRETION ADVISED – EDIT VIDEO TO REMOVE CURSE WORDS!!
HOW LOW CAN JOE(AND SATANIC CO-CONSPIRATORS) GO?
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-invites-anti-police-nonbinary-drag-queen-white-house-f-police
BIDEN’S CHARACTER AS FOLLOW(HIS ACTS OR OMISSIONS ARE THE DIRECT AND/OR INDIRECT CAUSE OF SHARON BRIDGEWATER 1993 – DEPRESSION AND/OR DISABILITY AS FOLLOWS :
“SATANIC FIRST LADIES CO-CONSPIRATORS AND/OR AIDERS AND ABETTERS, RACKETEERING EMPLOYEES, ASSOCIATES OF THEIR HUSBANDS U.S. PRESIDENT(MARK FROM JAN. 1, 1993” INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO JILL BIDEN AND PREDESSCORS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 THRU TO JILL BIDENS TERM, INCLUDING MELANIA TRUMP, MICHELLE OBAMA, LAURA BUSH, HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, BARBARA BUSH – SCHEMES TO DEFRAUD THE U.S.A. IT’S DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 371
USE HARRP
THE BJILL BIDEN & FAUCI IN FURTHERNACE OF THE MILITARY GRADE BIOWEAPONS
UPON INFORMATIONA DN BELIEF USE THEIR MILITARY GRADE – HARRP CAUSE WEATHER,
https://www.thefinalexodus.com/in-1993-senator-biden-hurt-the-witnesses
ONE WEEK LATER!! 12-7-2022
KNOWING THE TWO WITNESS TO GAIN AN ADVANTAGE
CONTINUNING “ANTI-CHRIST” & CONSPIRACY AGAINST ONE OR MORE GOD IN HEAVEN, TO DEFRAUD THE TWO WINTESSES(AND/OR HUMANITY MEN AND WOMEN CREATED IN THE IMAGE OF GOD) IN CONTINUED PREPARATION TO COMMIT GENOCIDE AGAINST THE TWO WITNESS AND/OR HUMANITY AND IN PREPARATIONFOR ARMAGEDDON FOLLOWS:
KINGS OF THE EAST OF EUPRATES GATHER AND PREPARE FOR(WEAPONS BUILD UP IN AND AROUND ISRAEL)ARMAGEDDON!!
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/us-accuses-russia-providing-weapons-fighter-jets-to-iran/
-THE BELOW SHOULD GO ON ANOTHER WEBPAGE –
THE SAUDIA ARABIA(EVERY KNOWS, OR SHOULD KNOW THAT SAUDIA ARABIA IS FORMER PRESIDENT’S[BOTH BUSHS’ FATHER & SON BUSINESS PARTNER & NOTHING HAS CHANGE BETWEEN THIS CURRENT DEFACTO PRESIDENT BIDE], Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates. ALONG WITH U.S.(BIDEN)ALL AGREE AND “ATTEMPT” TO POOL ALL AVAILABLE RESOURCES[MONEY AND PROPERTY DEFRAUDED STOLEN FROM U.S. CITIZENS ET AL FOR YEARS- -CLICK- HERE – U.S. PRESIDENTS AND HIDDEN IN THE U.A.E.] & CONTINUE TO “FUND” THE DRAGON
13 The dragon stood on the shore of the sea. And I saw a beast coming out of the sea. It had ten horns and seven heads, with ten crowns on its horns, and on each head a blasphemous name. 2 The beast I saw resembled a leopard, but had feet like those of a bear and a mouth like that of a lion. The dragon gave the beast his power and his throne and great authority. 3 One of the heads of the beast seemed to have had a fatal wound, but the fatal wound had been healed.
FAKE PROSECUTION TO PREVENT AND AVOID THE DEATH PENALTY
MERKEL AND CO-CONSPIRATORS
German Police Arrest 25 Members of Reich Citizens Over Conspiracy to Overthrow the State
12-12-2022 CO-CONSPIRATOR POLICE ALL OPERATING UNDER THEIR RACKETEERING BOSSES. “FAKE” POLICE RAID AT THE E.U.
12-12-2022
FINALLY THEY FIRED!!
INVITES DRAG QUEEN TO WHITE HOUSE
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-invites-anti-police-nonbinary-drag-queen-white-house-f-police
-CLICK HERE- FOR “VERY” INTERESTING FACTS ABOUT THE TWO WITNESSES IN CONTRAST TO THE ANTI-CHRIST!!
HACKABLE HUMANS VIDEO HERE
CLICK HERE FOR FORFEITURE OF ALL PROPERTY VIA RACKETEERING CNSPIRACY, EXTRADICTION OF FOREIGN OFFICIALS(ARREST WARRANT FOR JACOB ROTHCHILD, BORIS JOHNSON, AKA PRINCE CHARLES, IMMANUEL MACRON, “HEADS OF STATE,” “THE POPE” IN REM, CRIMINAL JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE OF JOE BIDEN, MERRICK GARLAND, WILLIAM BARR, DONALD TRUMP, KAMALA HARRIS ET AL(BY OPERATION OF LAW THE PRESIDENT )
COMES NOW “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL(AND APPOINTED COSTOus·to·di·anCAPPEARS IN WASHINGTON D.C. AND/OR RELATOR(POLICE OFFICER, LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER, JUDGE, JURY, PROSECUTOR)ARREST PUBLIC OFFICIALS FOR TREASON, VIOLATIONS OF THE NUMBERG CODE, WAR CRIMES, RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY LLEGAL USE OF MY NAME IN ONE OR MORE COURTS, WIRE FRAUD, EXTORTION, VIOLATE CR TO OBTAIN MONEY AND PROPERTY WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW
“THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL VS. JOE BIDEN’S AND DONALD TRUMP ET AL CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD – SATANIC BUILD BACK BETTER BILL – INTRODUCED IN EVERY COUNTRY – INTERNATIONAL GLOBAL ELITE AGENDA TO USE, TRICK, FRAUD AND SCHEME AND DEFRAUD ALL OF U.S. CITIZENS AND HUMANITY OUT OF ALL MONEY AND PROPERTY “LITERALLY” AND FORCING ALL OF HUMANITY TO WORSHIP SATAN AND HIS IMAGE “LITERALLY!!”
GOD IN HEAVEN GRANTS TWO WITNESSES AUTHORITY OF ALL OF SATAN’S ASSETS, MONEY ETC. & TO GATHER ALL WHO WANTS TO GO TO HEAVEN. “Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God. Whosoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation.
Romans 13:1-2 Who is a lying, slither, snake but he that conceal known facts and uses, scare tactics, etc. to force humanity to take a COV-19 injection to cause death, MARK OF THE BEAST !! None other than the King of Lies and deceit Satan/Lucifer!! Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son. 1 John 2:22 He that is not with me is against me; and he that gathereth not with me scattereth abroad. Matthew 12:30 YOU ARE FOR JESUS CHRIST OR ANTICHRIST!! “NO INBETWEENS!” COMES NOW BRIDGEWATER AND GATHER THE SAINTS OF GOD IN THIS FINAL EXODUS SEE BELOW, AND STARTING WITH THE HOUSE OF GOD(For the time is come that judgment must begin at the house of God: and if it first begin at us, what shall the end be of them that obey not the gospel of God 1 Peter 4:17 KJV!!
BIBLE PROPHECIES THAT ARE HAPPENING NOW(ALREADY PASSED OR CONCEALED FROM GENERAL PUBLIC AND DISCLOSED ON THIS WEBSITE -SEE BELOW)
IS IT ORDERED, AJUDGED AND DECREED THAT ALL EXECUTIVE ORDER BY JOE BIDEN IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS PRESIDENT(AND PREDECCESSORS FROM JAN.1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO HIS TERM)BILATERAL, MULTILATERAL AGREEMENTS WITH CHINA AND CO-CONSPIRATOR “HEADS OF STATE” ARE NULL AND VOID AND WITHOUT ANY LEGAL EFFECT – CLICK HERE-
ALL ABUSED THE COURTS, DENIED AND DEPRIVED THE TWO WITNESSES COURT ACCESS, EXPLOITED & DEFRAUDED THE TWO WITNESSES AND THE UNITED STATES IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 371 OUT OF MONEY AND/OR PROPERTY WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW!! MONEY IS DUE AND NOW OWING!!
OTHER CRIMINAL INFORMATION
NOTICE OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST JACOB ROTHCHILD, ALL “GLOBAL” CENTRAL BANKS, THE FEDERAL RESERVE AND FORFEITURE OF ALL TANGIBLE AND INTANGIBLE ETC. FOR RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY, ILLEGAL, UNLAWFUL RESTRAINTS IN TRADE AND WHICH ACTIVITES AFFECTED THE TWO WITNESSES AND HUMANITIES INTERSTATE OR FOREIGN COMMERCE (INTERNATIONAL CRIMES GENOCIDE, CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY(MURDER, EXTERMINATION, ENSLAVEMENT, DEPORTATION OR FORCIBLE TRANSFER OF POPULATION, IMPRISONMENT AND OTHER SEVERE DEPRIVATION OF PHYSICAL LIBERY IN VIOLATION OF FUNDAMENTAL RULE OF INTERNATION LAW, TORTURE VIA COV-19 “LOCKDOWN”, CHANGING THE TWO WITNESSES AND HUMANITY(MEN AND WOMEN CREATED IN THE IMAGE OF GOD) DNA VIA AN EXPERIMENTAL COV-19 INJECTION-VIOLATION OF THE NUREMBERG CODE,
COMMON LAW APPEAL, CRIMINAL – JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE TRUMP(MERRICK GARLAND) AND BIDEN CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD (CLICK HERE) THE TWO WITNESSES
COMES NOW SHARON[DAVIS- ABUSALEM]BRIDGEWATER VIA “THE 50 STATES EX REL PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR(ON BEHALF OF MY SON JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER THE SECOND WITNESS(TWO WITNESSES), U.S. CITIZENS “THE PEOPLE OF THE 50 STATES” AND/OR “HUMANITY, “REPRESENTATIVE YESHUA/JESUS CHRIST THE CREATOR OF ENTIRE UNIVERSE – GOD IN HEAVEN, THE TWELVE TRIBES OF ISRAEL) “CAREER OFFENDER AND CRIMINAL,” “THE GOD OF THE EARTH” JACOB ROTHCHILD, OWNER AND CONTROLLER OF MOST IF NOT ALL GLOBAL CENTRAL BANKS, ALL MILITARIES(SATAN’S REPRESENTATIVE –
JACOB ROTHCHILD AND HIS PREDESSORS CONTROL AND/OR OWNS ALL WORLD – CONTROL THE MONEY SUPPLY, CONTROL ALL “WARS” AND WHO RECEIVES WHAT AND WHEN, THE UKRAINE/PUTIN WAR IS A “FAKE” SHAM WAR TO DISTRACT “HUMANITY” ATTENTION FROM WHAT IS REALLY GOING ON BEHIND THE SCENE. “TA
LUCIFERIAN, SATANIST “LITERALLY”- ADVERSARY AND REBEL OF THE MOST HIGH GOD IN HEAVEN, REPRESENTATIVE OF THE THIRTEENTH BLOOD LINES(MIMICKED AFTER THE 12 TRIBES OF ISRAEL), SATANIST, FATHER OF LIES, EVIL, DECEPTION, SLANDERER, PRINCE OF DARKNESS(PRINCE OF IGNORANCE & RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL PAIN AND SUFFERING IN THE WORLD, ALL WARS)HATER OF ALL MEN CREATED IN THE IMAGE OF GOD IN HEAVEN INCLUDING MUSLIMS, HINDU’S, CHRISTIANS ETC. WHO JOB IS TO CREATE DIVISION AMONG TO MAKE GROUPS OF PEOPLE TO DISAGREE AND FIGHT WITH EACH OTHER SO THEY WILL NOT JOIN TOGETHER IN HARMONY TO DIVIDE AND MAINTAIN CONTROL AND ENSLAVE divide and conquer,
JUDICIAL RACKETEERING AND MONEY LAUNDERING, EXTORTION, ETC. DISMISSAL OF COMPLAINTS
ALL WHICH EFFECTED THE TWO WITNESSES AND INTERSTATE COMMERCE
TO CHANGE MEN AND WOMEN DNA
SURVIELLANCE STATE ETC.
FOR CONSPIRING WITH “THE INTERNATIONAL HILTER NAZI TERRORIST GROUP(FOR ONE OR MORE DURESS, COERCION, FRAUD, DECEPTION, RESTRAINT, CONSPIRACY TO RESTRAIN INTERSTATE AND FOREIGN COMMERCE TO ENSLAVE AND COMMIT GEONOCIDE, TO FORCE “HUMANITY” AND/OR THE TWO WITNESSES TO TAKE “THE COVID DEATH JAB” IN VIOLATIONS OF THE NUREMBERG VIOLATIONS OF THE)” – GEORGE H. BUSH AND PREDESSORS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT INCLUDING GEORE W. BUSH FOR HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS, RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY, IMMIGRATION OFFENSE ETC.
COMMIT GENOCIDE, KILL, STEAL AND DESTROY(HIS CO-CONSPIRATORS INTERNATIONAL HEADS OF STATE)
AND ISSUES LAWFUL ARREST WARRANTS AND EXTRADICTION AND JUDGE, ARREST, U.S. PUBLIC “THE SATANIC INTERNATIONAL ADOLF HITLER INTERNATIONAL FINAL GLOBAL HOLOCAUST TEAM,” CHINA THE “DRAGON,” AKA KNOWN AS THE BROKE NAKED CLOWN XI JINPING(CLICK HERE FOR ONE OR MORE “RETROACTIVE WARRANTS” & CONVICTION AND SENTENCE TO LIFE IMPRISONMENT AND/OR DEATH(CAPITOL PUNISHMENT) FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE NUM AND NOTICE OF EXTRADICTION OF XI JINPING, PUTIN, GERMANY’S ANGELA MERKEL, U.K. BORIS JOHNSON AND OTHER CO-CONSPIRATORS FOR INTERNATIONAL WAR CRIMES OF VIOLATION OF THE NUREMBERG CODE & FOR CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD THE U.S.A. IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 371 AND THE TWO WITNESSES – CLICK HERE)
BETWEEN “ALL INTERNATIONAL HEADS OF STATE” ESPECIALLY CHINA’S XI JINPING
ALL “HEADS OF STATE” U.S PUBLIC OFFICIALS INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO JOE BIDEN IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY( AND PREDESSCORS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO HIS TERM) KAMALA HARRIS IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS VICE PRESIDENTAND PREDESSCORS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO HIS TERM), MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL CONTIWITH EXTRADICTION TO THE U.S.A. FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE NUMBERG CODE OF THE COV-19 DEATH JAB(
COMES NOW “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR, AS JUDGE, JURY, PROSECUTOR, CLERK, U.S. MARSHAL, ETC. (ON BEHALF OF MYSELF, MY SON, U.S. CITIZENS AND HUMANITY) VICTIMS INJURED AND DAMAGE WITH STANDING(SEE BELOW)PURSUANT TO THE ADMIRALITY AND MARITIME LAW WHICH PROVIDES FOR “COMMON LAW REMEDIES” [AND DO NOT PROVIDE A RIGHT TO JURY TRIAL – SEE THIS WEBSITE] ) AND THE RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATION ACT OPEN PUBLIC COURT HEARING AND NOTICE OF ADJUDICATION FOR “RETRO-ACTIVE ARREST WARRANTS IN REM FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT FOR JOE BIDEN IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SENATOR OR VICE PRESIDENT, MERRICK GARALND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS CHIEF JUDGE FROM D.C. CIRCUIT,
ARREST WARRANTS, FORFEITURE IN REM ALL TANGIBLE AND INTANGIBLE(INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO DEFENSE EQUIPMENT – COMMITTED VIA WAR CRIMES PROPERTY PURSUANT TO THE RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATION( “THE PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP BIOTERRORIST BIO-WEAPONS INTERNATIONAL/TRANSNATIONAL ENTERPRIZE”) PERSONS EMPLOYED AND/OR ASSOCIATED WITH AND/OR ENGAGED IN ACTIVITIES WHICH AFFECTED AND CONTINUE TO AFFECT INTERSTATE OR FOREIGN COMMERCE, TO CONDUCT OR PARTICIPATE, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY IN THE CONDUCT OF SUCH ENTERPRIZE THRU A PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY FOR ILLEGAL RESTRAINTS IN TRADESHARON AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER VIA (TWO WITNESSES INJURED AND AND DAMAGED BY U.S. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES ONE OR MORE FRAUD, EXTORTION, ASSAULT & BATTERY, WIRE FRAUD, MAIL FRAUD, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, INJURED AND DAMAGED BY AN ILLEGAL IMMIGRATE[RAPE BY FRAUD & THEFT] VIA ONE OR MORE PRESDIENT FAILURE TO MAINTAIN U.S. BORDERS, CONSPIRACY TO ENGAGE IN A PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY, THE COV-19 INJECTION ) PURSUANT TO Article III, Section 3 OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION:
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
JOE BIDEN IN HIS “DEFACTO CAPACITY AS PRESIDENT OF U.S.A., KAMALA HARRIS IN HER “DEFACTO CAPACITY AS VICE PRESIDENT OF THE U.S.A. MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS DEFACTO CAPACITY AS ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE U.S.A., ” “CRIMINAL RACKETEERING CLASS REPRESENTATIVES” ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, U.S. LEGISLATORS, “GOVERNORS, MAYORS, ETC. EMPLOYEES OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT,” MAJOR CORPORATIONS, ON OR ABOUT JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT OWED AND CONTINUES TO OWE ALLEGIANCE TO THE U.S.A. AND U.S. CITIZENS, AND THE DEFENDANTS AND/OR RESPONDENTS KNOWINGLY, INTENTIONALLY BETRAYS AND CONTINUES TO BETRAY THAT ALLEGIANCE BY LEVING WAR AGAINST THE U.S.A. GOVERNMENT AND GIVE AID OR COMFORT TO CHINA AND “ENEMY” OF THE U.S.A. THEIR ACTS OR OMISSIONS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT CONSTITUTE TREASON AS FOLLOWS:
CLICK HERE
FORFEITURE OF ALL TANGIBLE AND INTANGIBLE PROPERTY INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ALL “ADVANCED” MILITARY TECHNOLOGY(INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WHEELLOCK, BELTON FUSIL, HIRST SCREW PLUG, HUNT VIOLITIONAL GATLING GUN, BURTON LIGHT MACHINE RIFLE, DAVID MARSHAL WILLIAMS M1 CARBINE PROTOTYPE, EM-2 RIFLE, ETC.), ROBOTIC TECHNONOLY, SUPERCOMPUTERS, SURVEILLANCE CAMERAS AND TECHNOLOGY, TELSA TECHNOLOGY, META PLATFORMS AND TECHNOLOGIES, VR HEADSETS, SMART DISPLAY, AR GLASSES, ELECTROMAGNETIC TECHNOLOGIES, 5G CELL TOWERS, APPLE & MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY, MILITARY TECHNOLOGY, INTERNET, ETC. (SEE BELOW LIST)
FORFEITURE OF ALL RIGHTS TANGIBLE AND INTANGIBLE
(The court, in imposing sentence on such person shall order, in addition to any other sentence imposed pursuant to this section, that the person forfeit to the United States all property described in this subsection. In lieu of a fine otherwise authorized by this section, a defendant who derives profits or other proceeds from an offense may be fined not more than twice the gross profits or other proceeds.(b) Property subject to criminal forfeiture under this section includes (1) real property, including things growing on, affixed to, and found in land; and (2) tangible and intangible personal property, including rights, privileges, interests, claims, and securities. (c) All right, title, and interest in property described in subsection (a) vests in the United States upon the commission of the act giving rise to forfeiture under this section. Any such property that is subsequently transferred to a person other than the defendant may be the subject of a special verdict of forfeiture and thereafter shall be ordered forfeited to the United States, unless the transferee establishes in a hearing pursuant to subsection (l) that he is a bona fide purchaser for value of such property who at the time of purchase was reasonably without cause to believe that the property was subject to forfeiture under this section.
ADDITIONAL LAW – Seizure of tangible or intangible property can properly be undertaken by “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR PERSONS NAMED AS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES OF THE ABOVE NAMED other persons or organizations if named by the court in the warrant of arrest, writ of attachment, or garnishment
https://www.cnn.com/2022/12/19/politics/led-cfl-light-bulb-rule-biden-climate/index.html
https://www.cnn.com/2022/12/19/politics/led-cfl-light-bulb-rule-biden-climate/index.html
——-
GOD GRANTS HIS SERVANTS THE TWO WITNESS FULL POWER AND AUTHORITY TO ARREST, EXTRADITE, JUDGE, PROSECUTE [JAIL AND INCARCERATE “LITERALLY”] AND SPEAK ON BEHALF OF ALL “HUMANITY “
– SEE BELOW FOR DEFINTION OF STANDING
U.S. GOVERNMENT & MAJOR CORPORATIONS(PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP), ONE OR MORE FACEBOOK, TWITTER, YOUTUBE ETC. ALL KNOWINGLY, INTENTIONALLY ATTEMPTED TO AND/OR CONSPIRED UNDER THE COLOR OF LAW AND DENY AND/OR DEPRIVED THE TWO WITNESSES(AND ALL OTHER COV-19 VICTIMS AND “ANTI-VAXERS” EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAW AND VIOLATED THE TWO WITNESSES U.S. CONSTITUTIONAL FIRST AMENDED RIGHT VIA CENSORED FACEBOOK, ETC. HAVE CONSPIRED TO DEPLETE THE 2 WITNESSES ACCOUNT
YES I AM A SOLIDER FOR YESHUA JESUS CHRIST AND WOULD LIKE TO HELP!!
AND OTHER RACKETEERING OFFENSE(CONSPIRACY WITH SPECIAL PROSECUTOR JACK SMITH, DONALD TRUMP, “DEFACTO” CHIEF LAW ENFORCMENT OFFICER OF THE U.S.A./ATTORNEY GENERAL MERRICK GARLAND, HILLARY CLINTON ET AL VIA “FAKE HUNTER BIDEN/H. CLINTON E-MAIL, SCAM” TO DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES- SEE BELOW) FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUNG THRU TO PRESENT
DOMESTIC TERRORISM & ELECTION FRAUD(A)FOR FINANCIAL GAIN.S S. BRIDGEWATER( HUMAN LIFE)
THAT ARE IN VIOLATION OF THE LAW OF THE U.S. AND/OR INTERNATIONAL LAW, WHICH ARE INTENDED TO INTIMIDATE, COERCE(THE TWO WITNESSES & HUMANITY[MEMBERS OF A CIVILIAN POPULATION)& TO INFLUENCE THE POLICY OF THE GOVERNMENT BY INTIMIDATION OR COERCION & TO AFFECT THE CONDUCT OF OF “THE GLOBAL GOVERNMENT” BY MASS DESTRUCTION, 18 U.S. Code § 2331 -“national of the United States” has the meaning given such term in section 101(a)(22) of the Immigration and Nationality Act;
attempted use, or threated use of physical force against the person of another; or (2) extortion, involves use of explosives, or otherwise involves conduct that presents a serious potential risk of physical injury to another. All maintained a________committed offenses as part of a pattern of cr
individual, entity, or organization engaged in planning or perpetrating any any [1] Federal crime of terrorism (as defined in section 2332b (g)(5)) against the United States, citizens or residents of the United States, or their property, and all assets, foreign or domestic, affording any person a source of influence over any such entity or organization;
(ii) acquired or maintained by any person with the intent and for the purpose of supporting, planning, conducting, or concealing any Federal crime of terrorism (as defined in section 2332b (g)(5) [2] against the United States, citizens or residents of the United States, or their property;
(iii) derived from, involved in, or used or intended to be used to commit any Federal crime of terrorism (as defined in section 2332b (g)(5)) against the United States, citizens or residents of the United States, or their property; or
(iv) of any individual, entity, or organization engaged in planning or perpetrating any act of international terrorism (as defined in section 2331) against any international organization (as defined in section 209 of the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 (22 U.S.C. 4309 (b)) or against any foreign Government. [3] Where the property sought for forfeiture is located beyond the territorial boundaries of the United States, an act in furtherance of such planning or perpetration must have occurred within the jurisdiction of the United States. (H) Any property, real or personal, involved in a violation or attempted violation, or which constitutes or is derived from proceeds traceable to a violation, of section 2339C of this title.((5) the term “Federal crime of terrorism” means an offense that— (A) is calculated to influence or affect the conduct of government by intimidation or coercion, or to retaliate against government conduct; and (B) is a violation of— (i) section 32 (relating to destruction of aircraft or aircraft facilities), 37 (relating to violence at international airports), 81 (relating to arson within special maritime and territorial jurisdiction), 175 or 175b (relating to biological weapons), 175c (relating to variola virus), 229 (relating to chemical weapons), subsection (a), (b), (c), or (d) of section 351 (relating to congressional, cabinet, and Supreme Court assassination and kidnaping), 831 (relating to nuclear materials), 832 (relating to participation in nuclear and weapons of mass destruction threats to the United States) 842(m) or (n) (relating to plastic explosives), 844(f)(2) or (3) (relating to arson and bombing of Government property risking or causing death), 844(i) (relating to arson and bombing of property used in interstate commerce), 930(c) (relating to killing or attempted killing during an attack on a Federal facility with a dangerous weapon), 956(a)(1) (relating to conspiracy to murder, kidnap, or maim persons abroad), 1030(a)(1) (relating to protection of computers), 1030(a)(5)(A) resulting in damage as defined in 1030(c)(4)(A)(i)(II) through (VI) (relating to protection of computers), 1114 (relating to killing or attempted killing of officers and employees of the United States), 1116 (relating to murder or manslaughter of foreign officials, official guests, or internationally protected persons), 1203 (relating to hostage taking), 1361 (relating to government property or contracts), 1362 (relating to destruction of communication lines, stations, or systems), 1363 (relating to injury to buildings or property within special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States), 1366(a) (relating to destruction of an energy facility), 1751(a), (b), (c), or (d) (relating to Presidential and Presidential staff assassination and kidnaping), 1992 (relating to terrorist attacks and other acts of violence against railroad carriers and against mass transportation systems on land, on water, or through the air), 2155 (relating to destruction of national defense materials, premises, or utilities), 2156 (relating to national defense material, premises, or utilities), 2280 (relating to violence against maritime navigation), 2280a (relating to maritime safety), 2281 through 2281a (relating to violence against maritime fixed platforms), 2332 (relating to certain homicides and other violence against United States nationals occurring outside of the United States), 2332a (relating to use of weapons of mass destruction), 2332b (relating to acts of terrorism transcending national boundaries), 2332f (relating to bombing of public places and facilities), 2332g (relating to missile systems designed to destroy aircraft), 2332h (relating to radiological dispersal devices), 2332i (relating to acts of nuclear terrorism), 2339 (relating to harboring terrorists), 2339A (relating to providing material support to terrorists), 2339B (relating to providing material support to terrorist organizations), 2339C (relating to financing of terrorism), 2339D (relating to military-type training from a foreign terrorist organization), or 2340A (relating to torture) of this title; (ii) sections 92 (relating to prohibitions governing atomic weapons) or 236 (relating to sabotage of nuclear facilities or fuel) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 ( 42 U.S.C. 2122 or 2284); (iii) section 46502 (relating to aircraft piracy), the second sentence of section 46504 (relating to assault on a flight crew with a dangerous weapon), section 46505(b)(3) or (c) (relating to explosive or incendiary devices, or endangerment of human life by means of weapons, on aircraft), section 46506 if homicide or attempted homicide is involved (relating to application of certain criminal laws to acts on aircraft), or section 60123(b) (relating to destruction of interstate gas or hazardous liquid pipeline facility) of title 49; or (iv) section 1010A of the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (relating to narco-terrorism).
(2) For purposes of paragraph (1), the term “proceeds” is defined as follows: (A) In cases involving illegal goods, illegal services, unlawful activities, and telemarketing and health care fraud schemes, the term “proceeds” means property of any kind obtained directly or indirectly, as the result of the commission of the offense giving rise to forfeiture, and any property traceable thereto, and is not limited to the net g
OVERT ACTS OF BIDEN ET AL – ALL KNEW THAT I WAS CLOSE TO GOING PUBLIC AND KNEW AND WHERE AWARE THEY HAVE ARREST WARRANTS
ON OR ABOUT 12/26/2022 07:00
TO “SOFTEN THE BLOW” WHEN THIS WEBSITE GOES VIRAL, ALL BEGIN TO MARKET “PENIS’S IMAGES(VIA CARROTS, SWEETPOTATOE AND SEX) VIA THE MEDIA TO “OFFSET” THERE ILLEGAL ACTIONS OF GUY/HOMOSEXUALS SINGING TO CHILDREN “SUCK ME —(SEE BELOW)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2022/12/19/biden-homeless-plan/
‘A sea change’: Biden reverses decades of Chinese trade policy
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/12/26/china-trade-tech-00072232
https://www.texastribune.org/2022/12/27/title-42-us-mexico-border-supreme-court/
U.S. SUPREME COURT – UPHELD FOR NOW – UNTIL THEY CAN GET MORE U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES TO RETIRE – SIMILAR TO BREYER(retirement)
AND BIDEN, K. HARRIS & K.B. JACKSON(replacement to advance the RICO enterprise to issue more void orders for 125 trillion) CONSPIRACY TO ISSUE VOID SUPREME COURT JUSTICE ORDER BY ILLEGALLY, UNLAWFULLY USING MY NAME “SHARON BRIDGEWATER AND/OR JAMES. S. BRIDGEWATER WITHOUT THE RIGHT, (WIRE FRAUD, MAIL FRAUD, ETC.)
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/23507944/supreme-court-sonia-sotomayor-elena-kagan-ruth-bader-ginsburg-retire, AND paving way for more of Biden appointments of “corrupt judges” to commit wire fraud, etc. via his conspiracy with Hunter Biden, his son e-mail scandal fraud!!
https://www.texastribune.org/2022/12/27/title-42-us-mexico-border-supreme-court/
to soften the blow –
https://www.ft.com/content/f4a68aaf-86d8-449f-ab2b-c24a5368b665
________________________________________________________________________________________________
POOL OF REAL ESTATE INVESTORS
TRUCKER CATCH U.S. GOVT. DESTROYING BABY FORMUA
https://www.bitchute.com/video/IcEkBEjjKsCG/
DARPHA REPLACE BABY FORMULA – WITH NANO TECH. FORMULA FROM EUROPE
https://www.theepochtimes.com/nestle-flying-baby-formula-to-us-from-europe-to-help-alleviate-shortages_4471741.html
nano-infant-formula-petition_57739Download
HITLER’S NAZI GERMANY “I.D. MARK” AS FOLLOWS:
HITLER’S DAUGHTER ANGELA MERKEL -IN COLLABORATION WITH BILL GATES AND OTHERS “GLOBAL HOLOCAUST NAZI GERMANY CO-CONSPIRATORS “I.D. 2020 MARK” AS FOLLOWS:
THE COV-19 injection(s), intent is; #1) to kill and/or cause death(genocide)of men and women created in the image of God in Heaven,(Mark men and Women for Hell and Death-see below) by graphene hydroxide nano structures via the COV-19 injection which act as ‘razor blades’ inside the veins of ‘vaccine’ recipients and is undetected in autopsies, #2)to enslave and/or to change men and women genes via the COV-19 injection to correspond, with Microsoft’s Bill and Melinda Gates(two prime co-conspirators) invisible COV-19 injection-invisible tattoo(that administer COV-19 injection and certify that you have been injected with the “Lucifer” “race”(Luciferase)bioluminescence mark,(“coming and/or mandated very soon”)marked for Eternal Hell and Death) “And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, oALL WILL BE FORCED TO RECEIVE THE COMING COVID “INVISIBLE TATTOO” THAT YOU MAY NOT BUY OR SALE PER BIDEN’S EXECUTIVE ORDER ” DIGITAL DOLLAR”
LUCIFERASE(“LUCIFER” “RACE”)invisible Quantum Dot Tattoo & the Seething Energies of the Light –
“the reason for the free obamacare phones CLICK HERE Revelation 13:16-18
King James Version
16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:
17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name. Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.”
BIDEN EXECUTIVE ORDER – 24 HOUR SURVIELLANCE(ENSLAVES) DEFRAUD ALL OUT OF MONEY IN THE BANK, SWITCH TO DIGITAL DOLLARS, AND FORCE YOU TO BUY WHAT THE GOVT. “SAY” YOU CAN BUY(NO MORE CHOICES)
Revelation 14:9-12
“And the third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, If any man worship the beast and his image, and receive his mark in his forehead, or in his hand, The same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of his indignation; and he shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels, and in the presence of the Lamb: And the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever and ever: and they have no rest day nor night, who worship the beast and his image, and whosoever receiveth the mark of his name. Here is the patience of the saints: here are they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus.”
-CLICK HERE-
THE FINAL – CHINA CREATES SUPERSOLIDERS – YOU ARE A SOLDIER IN THIS “FINAL END-TIME BATTLE FOR YESHUA/JESUS CHRIST OR SATAN VIA HIS DIRECT THREAT, COERCION AND FORCE TO TAKE THE “DEATH INJECTION” TO CONTROL AND ENSLAVE, TAKE ALL YOUR MONEY AND PROPERTY VIA BIDEN EXECUTIVE ORDER – COMING LUCIFERASE(“LUCIFER RACE”) INVISIBLE TATTOO – THAT YOU MAY NOT BUY OR SELL
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION
YOU ARE EITHER A SOLDIER FOR GOD IN HEAVEN THE CREATOR(YESHUA/JESUS CHRIST) OR SATAN/LUCIFER REBEL OF THE MOST HIGH GOD “A FALLEN ANGEL” CREATURE/SERPENT
COMING ZOMBIE APOCALYPSE(SATAN’S ARMY AGAINST YESHUA/JESUS CHRIST – CREATOR OF THE UNIVERSE VIA THE FINAL BATTLE OF ARMAGEDDON
SATAN(THE KING TO KILL, STEAL AND/OR DESTROY) ALL WHO DIED WITHOUT KNOWING YESHUA/CHRIST AND/OR WHO REJECT CHRIST WILL BE RAISED FROM THE DEAD AS ZOMBIE TO FIGHT IN THE END TIME BATTLE OF ARM –
THE ANTI-CHRIST WILL MIMICK YESHUA – JESUS CHRIST BY RAISING THESE DEAD PEOPLE FROM THE GRAVE(WHEN CHRIST RETURNS THE DEAD WILL ARISE FROM THEIR GRAVE TO MEET CHRIST)
MARK EKAWAMAI MINISTRIES
https://www.bitchute.com/video/AXXUO0Ei3uGu/
HumanSheeple
https://www.bitchute.com/video/AF3Cdw2RgBwZ/
CHANGE MEN AND WOMEN(CREATED IN THE IMAGE OF GOD IN HEAVEN – THE CREATOR)TO THE IMAGE OF THE CREATURE THE SERPENT”LUCIFER/SATAN” DNA”MODELED” AFTER THE GREAT DEPRESSION,
RETROACTIVE IMPLICATION
- This a a continuing conspiracy to defraud the United States and it’s agencies, departments, etc. in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, dating back to George Washington (February 22, 1732 – December 14, 1799) was an American military officer, statesman, and Founding Father who served as the first president of the United States from 1789 to 1797. Appointed by the Continental Congress as commander of the Continental Army, Washington led the Patriot forces to victory in the American Revolutionary War and served as the president of the Constitutional Convention of 1787, which created the Constitution of the United States and the American federal government. Washington has been called the “Father of the Nation” for his manifold leadership in the formative days of the country The Statue which require an overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy, the statute of limitations begins to run on the date of the last overt act. See Fiswick v. United States, 329 U.S. 211 (1946); United States v. Butler, 792 F.2d 1528 (11th Cir. 1986).
BIDEN, HARRIS(AND PREDECESSOR FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUNG THRU TO PRESENT) ARE GUILTY OF TREASON.
NOTICE OF “RETROACTIVE” FORFEITURE OF OFFICE, PROPERTY AND ARREST WARRANTS, ALSO IT IS DECREED, ORDERED, AND ADJUDED THAT ALL EXECUTIVE ORDER OF GEORGE H. BUSH, WILLIAM BILL CLINTON, GEORGE W. BUSH, BARAK H. OBAMA, DONALD TRUMP AND JOE BIDEN FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT, CONSPIRED TO COMMIT OFFENSES AGAINST THE U.SA. CONSPIRED TO COMMIT TREASON AND/OR CONSPIRED TO DEFRAUD THE U.S.A. IT’S DEPARTMENT AND AGENCIES IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 371 AND ENGAGED IN A PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY. ALL “OFFICES” ARE FORFEITED ALL EXECUTIVE ORDER FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT ARE IS NULL AND VOID AND WITHOUT ANY LEGAL EFFECT, NOTICE OF RETROACTIVE ARREST WARRANTS FOR INTERNATIONAL “HEADS” OF STATE, UNITED NATION REPRESENTATIVE, WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION REPRESENTATIVE FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT!!
IT IS DECREED, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED THAT ALL WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION(ALL CONTRACTUAL RIGHTS), UNITED NATIONS – ORDERS, EMERGENCY ONE OR MORE COVID, MONKEY POX, “FLU” ETC. “HEALTH ORDERS” ARE NULL AND VOID AND WITHOUT ANY LEGAL EFFECT!!
ALL CORRUPT!!
COMES NOW THE TWO WITNESSES STATE IN OPEN COURT, DECREE, ORDER, ADJUDGE(SENTENC THAT JOE BIDEN, DONALD TRUMP, MERRICK GARLAND ET AL IS GULITY OF TREASON IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S. Code § 2381 – Treason
FORFEITS ALL PROPERTY TO “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR AND BY OPERATION OF LAW FORFEITS PUBLIC OFFICE(SEE BELOW)
IN RE “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR
VS.
JOE BIDEN IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS U.S. PRESIDENT(CRIMINAL CLASS DEFENDANTS AND/OR RESPONDENT REPRESENTATIVE)THE WHITE HOUSE, U.S. CAPITOL BUILDING, THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, The Pentagon, “CRIMINAL” KAMALA HARRIS IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS VICE PRESIDENT “CRIMINAL” CLASS REPRESENTATIVE, MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL “CRIMINAL CLASS REPRESENTATIVE,
EXECUTIVE ORDER – TO DEFRAUD ALL U.S. CITIZENS OUT OF MONEY AND/PROPERTY FORCE U.S. CITIZENS INTO SLAVERY
on behalf of one or more
INCLUDE A LIST OF DEFENDANTS AND/OR RESPONDENTS HERE
https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2021/09/22/1039293816/covid-delta-variant-fda-commissioner
Food and Drug Adminstrator(FDA)Dr. Robert Califf and/or Commissioner Stephen Hahn Hahn and FDA vaccine chief Peter Marks(and Predecessors from Jan. 1, 1993 and continuing thru to present)
The United States Federal Reserve, all Central Banks, all State Banks, Hayes Valley Limited Partnership, $1,000,000,000,000,000.00(Quadrillion )in currency(all currency including but not limited to all currency including the U.S. Dollar and/or Digital Dollar, the Chinese Yuan and/or digital yuan, Russian ruble and/or digital ruble, India rupee and/or digital rupee, etc. all cryptocurrency including but not limited to Bitcoin, USD Coin, King Charles III’s coin etc.) all tangible(including but not limited to The White House, The U.S. Department of Justice, The Department of Defense, The Supreme Court, The District Court of Columbia, The U.S. District Court of Appeals, All bank owned Real Estate[REO’s] Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac properties, McCormack Baron Salazar properties, SunAmerica Affordable Housing Partners properties etc. and intangible property(including but not limited to all types of Digital ledger Technology and/or Blockchains, Cern, ICANN, Petroleum, crude oil, fossil fuels, coal and natural gas, any and all contractual right affording a source of influence over an enterprise including but not limited to water rights via legal entitlement authorizing water to be diverted from a specified source, water, land, Papers, records, books, journals, ledgers, accounts, statements, memoranda, reports, invoices, work sheets, work papers, notes, transcriptions of notes, letters, correspondence, communications, abstracts, checks, diagrams, plans, blueprints, specifications, pictures, drawings, films, photographs, graphic representations, diaries, calendars, desk calendars, pocket calendars, lists, logs, publications, advertisements, press releases, facsimilies, newspapers, magazines, instructions, minutes, orders, bills, purchase orders, messages, resumes, summaries, for case, graphs, charts, appraisals, analytical records, reports, brochures, pamphlets, circulars, trade letters, agreements, contracts, letters of intent, telegrams, telexes, cables, recordings, audio tapes, magnetic tapes, visual tapes, transcripts of tapes or recordings, computer disks, tapes and cards, information stored in or accessible through computer or other information retrieval systems, including hard copies of electronic mail or information contained on computer hard drives, or any other writings or tangible or electronic things on which any handwriting, typing, printing, audio, visual, photographic or other forms of communication or information which are recorded or reproduced, goods and chattels, or credits and effects in the hands of garnishees to be named in the process ALL TANGIBLE AND INTANGLE PROPERTY, INCLUDING but not limited to intellectual property
- brands and logos
- product names
- inventions and products
- original software
- designs
- shape and appearance of a product
- music
- books
- poems
- paintings
- photography
- other kinds of creative work
- ICANN
- patents
- trade marks
- copyright
- designs
NOTICE OF INTENT TO AMEND THIS WEBPAGE AND/OR CLAIM TO ADD ADDITIONAL DEFENDANTS AND/OR RESPONDENTS AVIA PRAECIPE TO JOIN ADDITIONAL “CRIMINAL” DEFENDANTS AND/OR RESPONDENTS
IN ADDITION
.
COMES NOW SHARON[DAVIS-ABUSALEM]BRIDGEWATER VIA “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PEOPLE OF THE 50 STATES(MY SON TWO VICTIMS AND FEDERAL WITNESSES INJURED AND DAMAGED IN BUSINESS, PERSON OR PROPERTY WITH FIRST HAND FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT(CONTINUAL VIOLENCE AND OPPRESSION, RENDERED DISABLED BY THEIR HEINOUS ACTS OR OMISSION FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING, RESTRAINED FROM INTERSTATE AND FOREIGN COMMERCE BY CORRUPT U.S. GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, INCLUDING BIDEN, HARRIS, ALL U.S. REPRESENTATIVE, ALL GOVERNORS, ETC.[A.K.A. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES] ACTING IN THEIR INDIVIDUAL WITH AN “INTERNATIONAL ADOLPH HITLER SATANIC BIOTERRORIST BIOLOGICAL WARFARE TERRORIST GROUP ENTERPRISE – RING -JACOB ROTHCHILD “LITERALLY” SATANIST, LUCIFERIAN, AND OWNER AND CONTROLLER OF MOST IF NOT ALL “GLOBAL” CENTRAL BANKS, ALL CURRENCIES, THE U.S. FEDERAL RESERVE ETC. TO DEFRAUD MY SON AND I, “TWO WITNESSES” OUT OF MONEY AND/OR PROPERTY WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW) ON BEHALF OF MY, SON, THE PEOPLE OF THE 50 STATES AND/OR HUMANITY VIA “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE 50 STATES AND/OR THE PEOPLE OF THE 50 STATES PURSUANT THE CORRUPT ORGANIZATION ACT(RICO)SEE BELOW FOR DEFINITION, TO U.S. GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS THE CORRAUTHORIZED REPRESENTIVE OF “THE 50 STATES AND/OR THE PEOPLE OF THE 50 PURSUANT TO TH CONTINUAL VIOLENCE AND OPPRESSION, RENDERED DISABLED BY THEIR HEINOUS ACTS OR OMISSION FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING TO JAN. 1, 2009 AND FURTHER CONTINUING THRU INTENTIONAL” CONTINUAL VIOLENCE AND OPPRESSION BY PRESENT)“INJURED AND DAMAGED IN BUSINESS, PERSON OR PROPERTY, RESTRAINED FROM INTERSTATE AND FOREIGN COMMERCE BY JACOB ROTHCHILD(SATAN’S REPRESENTATIVE “LITERALLY” RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CORONAVIRUS, HIV, ZIKA VIRUS, MONEY POX, TOMATO POX “LITERALLY” – SEE BELOW – PROOF” ) AND CO-CONSPIRATORS ONE OR MORE TRUMP, GARLAND, BIDEN, HARRIS, OBAMA “U.S. GOVERNMENT STATE ACTORS” CONTINUAL VIOLENCE AND OPPRESSION, RENDERED DISABLED BY THEIR HEINOUS ACTS OR OMISSION FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING TO JAN. 1, 2009 AND FURTHER CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT AND THRUINTENTIONAL” CONTINUAL VIOLENCE AND OPPRESSION AND THE RUNNING OF ANY STATUE OF LIMITATION TO ADMIRALTY AND/OR MARITIME CLAIMS AND/OR CRIMINAL PROSECUTION(ETC.)IS NOT TIME BARRED ANDWITH FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE LIMITATIONS IS TOLLED –
WITNESS WITH FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE AND STANDING, “THE ONLY TWO PEOPLE IN THE WORLD PERSON IN THE WORLD DENIED COURT ACCESS SINCE AUGUST 2008 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT, AUTHORIZE(SEE AFFIDAVIT – APPEARANCE AS COUNSEL FOR THE 50 STATES)AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE 50 STATES, AND/OR “INTERNATIONAL PROSECUTOR – AS IN INTERNATIONAL PROSECUTOR” AS IN INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT
RETAILATED AGAINST IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S. Code § 1513 (ON BEHALF OF MYSELF, MY SON, ALL U.S. CITIZENS – “PEOPLE OF THE 50 STATES”) THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY AND/OR RELATOR STANDING!! COMES NOW “THE UNITED STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR PURSUANT 28 U.S.C. § 1651, AND ISSUE WRITS NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE IN AID OF THIS ADMIRALTY AND/OR MARITIME TIME “COMMON LAW” ARREST WARRANTS, FORFEITURE, ETC.
SEE BELOW DECLARATORY JUDGMENT, BI-LATERAL CLASS REPRESENTATIVES, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION, ARREST WARRANTS IN REM AND OTHER ADMIRALITY AND/OR MARITIME DOCUMENTS
PLAINTIFF/CLAIMANT INCORPORATES THE FOLLOWING EXH. A AS FULLY SET FORTH HEREIN
ADDITIONAL CRIMINAL INFORMATION
GOVERNMENT PARTICIPATES AS RICO(1961)(4)
“Office of the United States President”, “ Office of the United States Attorney”
“Office of the U.S. Supreme Court Justices” “Office of U.S. Legislators and/or Congressman”
A line of cases hold that any governmental agency, court, political office or the like could serve as a RICO “enterprise.” United States v. Thompson, 685 F.2d 993, 999 (6th Cir. 1982)(en banc) cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1072 (1983). Among the government units that have been held to be “enterprises” are offices of governors and state legislators, courts, court clerks’ offices. See e.g., United States v. Stratton, 649 F.2d 1066, 1072-75 (5th Cir. 1981); United States v. Clark, 656 F.2d 1259, 1261-67 (8th Cir. 1981) Office of county judge); United States v. Frumento, 405 F. Supp. 23, 29-30 (E.D. Pa. 1975), affd, 563 F.2d 1083 (3d Cir. 1977). cert, debued, 434 U.S. 1072 (1978).
In referring to the RICO liability of government offices the court thought it inconceivable that “in considering the ever more widespread tentacles of organized crime in the nation’s economic life, Congress intended to ignore an important aspect of the economy [simply] because it was state operated and state controlled ….” (563 F.2d at 1091.) Accepting defendants’ contentions would mean that “business organizatons legitimately owned and operated by the states, even though their activities substantially affect interstate commerce, would be open game for racketeers. [The court refused] to believe that Congress had such ‘tunnel-vision’ when it enacted the racketeering statute or that it intended to exclude from the protective embrace of this broad statute, designed to curb organized crime, state operated commercial ventures engaged in interstate commerce, or other governmental agencies regulating commercial and utility operations affecting interstate commerce.”Decisions after Frumento expanded government activity to every conceivable government agency, court, or political office. United States v. Thompson, 669 F.2d 1143 (6th Cir), revd 685 F.2d 993 (6th Cir. 1982)(en banc), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1072 (1983) The Enterprize “OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY .” AND “US PRESIDENT” AND CONSTITUTE A LEGAL ENTERPRIZE “OFFICE OF SUPREME COURT JUSTICE OR JUDICIAL OFFICE” LEGAL ENTEPRIZE AND ASSOCIATION“OFFICE OF ELECTIONS”
Series of Documented Acts Comprising the RICO Offenses
A criminal racketeering enterprise requires a minimum of two contiguous acts to meet the legal definition of a racketeering enterprise. Dozens of such contiguous acts are documented including but not limited to:
- Repeated cover-ups, from 1993 and continuing thru the filing of this complaint, by federal judges and State Judges of ongoing documented corruption in the government’s Office of the President(White House), Office of the Attorney .(Department of Justice),[law enforcement agencies in California, Georgia, Michigan] Office of HUD(The Department of HUD), “other US Governnent Agencies,” that enabled to occur a series of major fraud on the United States which is the direct and proximate cause of the financial economic collapse −including but not limited to US Government joint participaton with Contractors fraud, Corporations , Partnerships, lawyers fraud , (under the Biden(Harris) adminitrationand Obama Bush[Iraq War],Clinton Adminstration)
- War Crimes, Crimes against Humanity, Repeated Terrorist Attacks, Repeated cover-ups of the criminal activities in overt and covert government operations that the Plaintiffs(the original source)discovered while a public housing facility.
- The evidence of repeated conduct constituting “continual”obstruction of justice that they knew would continue to result in great harm to the two witnesses, U.S. Citizens and/or American people , the US Government, the US Treasury and to national security.
- The evidence of repeated felony retaliation against Whistleblowers such as the Plaintiff Sharon Bridgewater, and other Whistleblowers in the “Fast and furious,” “Benhi Scandle” etc. for attempting to report high-level crimes against the United States and to criminally halt ability to report such crimes.
- The corrupt, illegal and unconstitutional seizure of the Plaintiff business and personal property to restrain commerce knowingly it would cause great harm and impair the Plaintiff ability to conduct commerce.
- The corrupt, illegal, extortion and money laundering of US public housing tenants
- The IRS corrupt, illegal and unconstitutional targeting of tea party members.
- The illegal, unconstitutional “amendment” to our US Constitution right that violate US Citizens right to bear arms and/or our right to freedom of religion.
- The corrupt, illegal and unconstitutional seizure of the AP Phone Records, violation of the “press” first amendment US Constitutional right.
- The unconstitutional mandate of Obamacare.
- Converting the courts, and their judicial positions, into a racketeering enterprise.
- Perpetrating a series of predicate acts, that far exceeded the legal criteria for being a criminal racketeering enterprise.
- Each of these criminal acts were compounded by the fact that they were perpetrated by people in positions of trust, who were paid to enforce the law.
- Expanding on the number of parties involved in the series of predicate acts were the unknown−but suspected−Eric Holder and the U.S. Department of Justice−(and his predesors)parties that were orchestrating the multiple schemes and conspiracies and protecting each of the criminal acts of each and every one.
- Several US Senators and Congressman, confirming Todd Jones ATF director when they knew and were aware of a criminal pending investigation, and schemes to defraud the USA.
RICO Details
A criminal RICO racketeering organiztion crime requires:
- Two or more related predicate acts, in a conspiracy. Predicate offenses are related if they have (a) the same or similar purposes, (b) results, (c) participants, (c) victims, or (d) methods of commission.
- Same purposes. The participants’ purpose was to defraud the two witnesses out of money and/or property without due process of law, use trick, scheme, deception, money and/or property and/or the intangle right to honest services, “inflict” extreme emotional distress on the Plaintiffs and/or Petitioners and/or other Whistleblowers(such as in Swartz case)to block Sharon Bridgewater and/or James and other “COV-19 vaccine -injection”and other Whistleblowers, the press from reporting a continuing series of corrupt, with corporations, and criminal acts of public officials joint participation with Corporations, individuals, to defraud the USA involving key people in government.
- Results. The results included hindering and halting Sharon Bridgewaters and/or other Whistleblowers and/or the press from reporting the crime and/or ability to properly report, publicize, and halt the ongoing corruption and conspiracy to defraud the USA.
- Participants. The participants included the repeated acts by the same people and groups, public officials including US Presidents, federal judges, Justice Department employees, lawyers, California, Michigan and judges and others acting in joint participation with each other.
- Victims. The victims included:
- Repeated harm to The United States of America agenSharon Bridgewater et al, other Whistleblowers, and US Citizens(the USA) and/or the press. The harm consisted of seizing the Plaitniffs personal and business assets, depriving the Plaintifff Sharon Bridgewater and/or . the right to conduct commerce; depriving the Plaintiff and/or US Citizens and/or Whistleblower through a series of unlawful and unconstitutional judicial the rights and protections guaranteed to all citizens by the laws and constitution of the United States and/or the ability of IRS official to collect taxes, and/or the ability of the Plaintiffs, Whistleblowers and/or the Press to exercise their 1st US Constitutonal amendment right to free speech.
- People of the United States who were harmed by the series of criminal acts and the documents actions of federal judges, Justice Public Officials, Department ofthememployees et al, and others, that enabled the crimes and resulting harm to continue.
- Method of commission. As it relates to the current and/or former presidents, public officials, federal judges and Justice Department participants, they perpetrated a series of acts including (a) failing to report the crime to congressional members and/or the US Government Oversight Committee members(b)labeling the Plaintiffs as a vexatious ligation (c)gross prosecutial misconduct(d)acts of violence against Whistleblower for attempting to report the ongoing crimes against the United States etc.(e)failing to change IRS tax laws.
- Same purposes. The participants’ purpose was to defraud the two witnesses out of money and/or property without due process of law, use trick, scheme, deception, money and/or property and/or the intangle right to honest services, “inflict” extreme emotional distress on the Plaintiffs and/or Petitioners and/or other Whistleblowers(such as in Swartz case)to block Sharon Bridgewater and/or James and other “COV-19 vaccine -injection”and other Whistleblowers, the press from reporting a continuing series of corrupt, with corporations, and criminal acts of public officials joint participation with Corporations, individuals, to defraud the USA involving key people in government.
- The racketeering acts were related, the intent being to halt the reporting and publicizing of high-level criminal activities.
- Their actions consisted of a continuing pattern of criminal activities.
- All of the actions were continuing, from 1993 thru the filing of this complaint, and arguably continuing as judicial orders still exist in several federal courts attempting to bar the Plaintiff Sharon Bridgewater and/or Whistleblowers and/or the Press from filing any papers in any federal district or appellate court. These orders knowingly obstructed justice by blocking the Plaintiff Sharon Bridgewater et al from reporting major and deadly criminal activities against the United States; and blocked the Sharon Bridgewater, Whistleblowers et al from exercising federal defenses against the pattern of civil and constitutional, and criminal acts for which they are federal causes of actions for which federal defenses exist.
- The predicate acts and conspiracy gravely affected interstate commerce, and caused, or enabled to occur, a continuing series of major fraud against the USA and/or the Plaintiff which is thedirect and proximate cause of the financial ecomomic collapse and also affects interstate commerce through criminal activities in the US Government of public officials, abuse of US Government power, committing criminal acts of bribery, corruption, and for pand acting outside their scope of authority and in their individual capacities.
RICO REQUIRES NO MORE THAN
SLIGHT EFFECT UPON INTERSTATE COMMERCE
The Plaintiffs was damaged or injured in business or property. RICO Requires no more than a slight effect upon interstate commerce. United States v. Doherty, 867 F.2d 47, 68 (1st Cir. 1989). United States v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1531 (7th Cir. 1985). cert. denied, 106 S.Ct. 1188 (1986).Predicate acts were related to the common purpose of the enterprise, defraud US taxpayers, Consumers, and/or Class Plainitff and being to halt Sharon Bridgewater and other Whistleblowers and/or the press from reporting and publicizing the ongoing criminal activities. See United States v. Bonanno Organized Crime Family, 683 F. Supp. 1411, 1437 (E.D.N.Y. 1988). All aided, abetted, counseled, commanded, induced or procured to defraud the US, taxpayers, and/or the Class Plaintiff and/or commit predicate acts as defined in 18 USC section 1961(5) and further Eric Holder and Obama obstructed justice. Further, Congress limited the force of Rule 8(b) by loosening the statutory requirements for what constitutes joint criminal activities. United States v. Friedman, 854 F.2d 535, 561 (2d Cir. 1988); United States v. Castellano, 610 F.Supp. 1359, 1396 (S.D.N.Y. 1985). If a defendant is not named in a conspiracy or RICO count, he may be charged in a separate court, in the same indictment, if he is alleged to have participated in the same series of acts or transactions that constituted the conspiracy or RICO offense. Further as far as the RICO enterprize, some benefited from the enterprise, and some did not. The racketeering activity is not required to benefit the enterprise. (The participants in the scheme are not required to have personally profited, though some did. United States v. Killip, 819 F.2d 1542, 1`549 (10th Cir. 1987. )
Some defendants agreed to join conspiracy with knowledge that other members were to commit at least two acts of racketeering. United States v. Leisure, 844 F.2d 1347, 1367 (8th Cir. 1988). See ‘ 1962(d), defendant agreed to join conspiracy with knowledge that other members were to commit at least two acts of racketeering.
In Shearin v. E.F. Hutton Group, Inc., 885 F.2d 1162 (3d Cir. 1989). The court held that Shearin, a pro se plaintiff, could recover for being fired, if she proved that it was an overt act in furtherance of an alleged ‘ 1962(d) conspiracy to bilk Hutton customers for trust services which were never performed. In Sedima the court noted that standing to sue under ” 1962(a)──(c) is based on proof that the predicate racketeering acts caused injury to plaintiff’s business or property. 473 U.S. at 495. The court also held that Sedina did not foreclose the possibility that harm arising from a conspiratorial overt act, distinct from the predicate acts listed in ‘ 1961(1), could confer standing under ‘ 1962(d). 885 F.2d at 1169-70.
Defendant was aware of the “essential nature” of the enterprise, which was a group of persons associated for the purpose of luring people into rigged card games. United States v. Joseph, 835 F.2d 1149, 1152 (6th Cir. 1987); in United States v. Gallo, 667 F. Supp. 1359, 1401, (S.D.N.Y. 1985), the defendant must have knowledge of the enterprise and at least some of its criminal activities; Defendant must have been aware of at least the . existence of the enterprise (United States v. Castellano, 610 F.Supp. 1359, 1401 (E.D.N.Y. 1985); in order to prove RICO conspiracy count government must show the existence of a “unified agreement to participate in the affairs of the enterprise through a pattern of racketeering ….”
The court held that § 1962(c) does not require concerted criminal activity, only that an individual commit at least two acts of racketeering while participating in the conduct of an enterprise. United States v. Castallano, 610 F.Supp. 1359, 1392-1396 (S.D.N.Y. 1985). Id at 1394.
RICO Violations Involving A
Continuing Series of ATTACK ON THE PLAINTIFFS AND OTHER WHISTLEBLOWERS
Dozens of separate predicate acts were perpetrated to block Sharon Bridgewater and/or Whistleblowers and/or the press from reporting ongoing criminal activities in high-level overt and covert operations involving government employees. That constituted claims under ‘ 1962(a),(b), (c), and (d), in factual allegations.
1. RICO violators within the Office of the President, Office of the Attorney ., Office of HUD, et al conspired with each other to halt the former Sharon Bridgewater and/or other Whistleblowers, “ the press” to disclose their major fraud, and/or to inflict economic hardship on the Plaintiff, restrain commerce, cause the Plaintiff suffering, and prevent the Plaintff from carrying out her responsibilities to report the crimes, all while all were either operating, directly or managing federal funds, and or Offices of the US Government.
- All Aided and abetted the repeated massive RICO violations and violated the Plaintiff civil right repeatedly.
- Federal judges as RICO violators, entered the conspiracy, and continued actively from 2008 and continuing thru the filing of this complaint. Their predicate acts included:
- Repeatedly blocking the Sharon Bridgewater complaint to halt the ability of the Plainiff to report the crime
- Entering a vexatious ligatant order
- Vacacating settlement conferences.
- Issued a series of unlawful and unconstitutional orders, with criminal intent, to halt the Plaintiffs ability to report the crimes.
- Corruptly, through violation of federal laws and constitutional protections, defrauded the USA in amounts in excess of 50(fifty) trillion dollars and knew and were aware ththey did not have the authority to schme and defraud, the USA.
- Lawyers as RICO participants, aided, abetted the these corporations, partnerships, President and corporations, et al engaged in a series of unlawful lawsuits from 1993 and thru the filing of this complaint, that violated blocks of state and federal laws and constitutional protections, that required the corrupt cooperation of Federal judges and federal judges.
ROTHCHILD AND CO-CONSPIRATORS, BIDEN(AND PREDECESSORS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 THRU TO PRESENT)INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGES, COMMITTED WIRE FRAUD, MAIL FRAUD LAUNDER MONEY THRU ALL CENTRAL BANKS AND/OR THE FEDERAL RESERVE, THE WHITE HOUSE, THE U.S. CAPITOL BUILDING IN WASHINGTON D.C. U.S. DEFENSE DEPARTMENT, CDC ETC.(REAL PROPERTY) ALL WERE involved in a transaction or attempted transaction in violation of section 1956, 1957 or 1960 of this title, or any property traceable to such property.
ALL COMMITTED CRIMES OF COVID – 19 BIOLOGICAL WARFARE, (B) Any property, real or personal, within the jurisdiction of the United States, constituting, derived from, or traceable to, any proceeds obtained directly or indirectly from an offense against a foreign nation, or any property used to facilitate such an offense, if the offense— (i) involves trafficking in nuclear, chemical, biological, or radiological weapons technology or material, or the manufacture, importation, sale, or distribution of a controlled substance (as that term is defined for purposes of the Controlled Substances Act), or any other conduct described in section 1956 (c)(7)(B);
(ii) would be punishable within the jurisdiction of the foreign nation by death or imprisonment for a term exceeding 1 year; and
(iii) would be punishable under the laws of the United States by imprisonment for a term exceeding 1 year, if the act or activity constituting the offense had occurred within the jurisdiction of the United States.
ALL REAL property, real or personal, which constitutes or is derived from proceeds traceable to a violation of section 215, 471, 472, 473, 474, 476, 477, 478, 479, 480, 481, 485, 486, 487, 488, 501, 502, 510, 542, 545, 656, 657, 670, 842, 844, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1014, 1028, 1029, 1030, 1032, or 1344 of this title or any offense constituting “specified unlawful activity” (as defined in section 1956 (c)(7) of this title), or a conspiracy to commit such offense.
(D) Any property, real or personal, which represents or is traceable to the gross receipts obtained, directly or indirectly, from a violation of— (i) section 666 (a)(1) (relating to Federal program fraud);
(ii) section 1001 (relating to fraud and false statements);
(iii) section 1031 (relating to major fraud against the United States);
(iv) section 1032 (relating to concealment of assets from conservator or receiver of insured financial institution);
(v) section 1341 (relating to mail fraud); or
(vi) section 1343 (relating to wire fraud),
if such violation relates to the sale of assets acquired or held by the the [1] Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as conservator or receiver for a financial institution, or any other conservator for a financial institution appointed by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency or the National Credit Union Administration, as conservator or liquidating agent for a financial institution.
(E) With respect to an offense listed in subsection (a)(1)(D) committed for the purpose of executing or attempting to execute any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent statements, pretenses, representations or promises, the gross receipts of such an offense shall include all property, real or personal, tangible or intangible, which thereby is obtained, directly or indirectly.
(F) Any property, real or personal, which represents or is traceable to the gross proceeds obtained, directly or indirectly, from a violation of— (i) section 511 (altering or removing motor vehicle identification numbers);
(ii) section 553 (importing or exporting stolen motor vehicles);
(iii) section 2119 (armed robbery of automobiles);
(iv) section 2312 (transporting stolen motor vehicles in interstate commerce); or
(v) section 2313 (possessing or selling a stolen motor vehicle that has moved in interstate commerce).
(G) All assets, foreign or domestic— (i) of any individual, entity, or organization engaged in planning or perpetrating any any [1] Federal crime of terrorism (as defined in section 2332b (g)(5)) against the United States, citizens or residents of the United States, or their property, and all assets, foreign or domestic, affording any person a source of influence over any such entity or organization;
(ii) acquired or maintained by any person with the intent and for the purpose of supporting, planning, conducting, or concealing any Federal crime of terrorism (as defined in section 2332b (g)(5) [2] against the United States, citizens or residents of the United States, or their property;
(iii) derived from, involved in, or used or intended to be used to commit any Federal crime of terrorism (as defined in section 2332b (g)(5)) against the United States, citizens or residents of the United States, or their property; or
(iv) of any individual, entity, or organization engaged in planning or perpetrating any act of international terrorism (as defined in section 2331) against any international organization (as defined in section 209 of the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 (22 U.S.C. 4309 (b)) or against any foreign Government. [3] Where the property sought for forfeiture is located beyond the territorial boundaries of the United States, an act in furtherance of such planning or perpetration must have occurred within the jurisdiction of the United States. (H) Any property, real or personal, involved in a violation or attempted violation, or which constitutes or is derived from proceeds traceable to a violation, of section 2339C of this title.
(2) For purposes of paragraph (1), the term “proceeds” is defined as follows: (A) In cases involving illegal goods, illegal services, unlawful activities, and telemarketing and health care fraud schemes, the term “proceeds” means property of any kind obtained directly or indirectly, as the result of the commission of the offense giving rise to forfeiture, and any property traceable thereto, and is not limited to the net gain or profit realized from the offense.
(B) In cases involving lawful goods or lawful services that are sold or provided in an illegal manner, the term “proceeds” means the amount of money acquired through the illegal transactions resulting in the forfeiture, less the direct costs incurred in providing the goods or services. The claimant shall have the burden of proof with respect to the issue of direct costs. The direct costs shall not include any part of the overhead expenses of the entity providing the goods or services, or any part of the income ta
ALL IS FORFEITED TO SHARON[DAVIS- ABUSALEM]BRIDGEWATER VIA “THE 50 STATES EX REL PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR
The evidence showed a nexus between the racketeering activities and the enterprise, the goal of which was to overthrow the US Constitution, deprive and/or denied the Plaintiffs rights as secured by international and/or nation treaties(the US Constituion), and defraud US Taxpayers, Consumer the intangle right to honest services and overthrow the US Govenrment prevent the Class Plaintiffs and/or Petitioners from reporting and exposure of a continuing pattern of corrupt and criminal activities that were inflicting, and would continue to inflict, great harm upon the United States.
has___ been generally damaged in the sum of $____.
2) in deliberate ignorance; or
(3) in reckless disregard and submitted claims to the US Treasury for the years of 2010(3.4 Trillion), 2011(3.6 Trillion), 2012(3.5 Trillion), 2013(3.4 Trillion), 2014(3.5 Trillion), 2015(3.6 Trillion) 2016(3.9 Trillion), AND 2017(4.1 Trillion)(US budget for these years can be verfied at www:_____________)which constitute a false claims under the Federal False Claims act, in the amount of $84,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00(EIGHTY FOUR TRILLION DOLLARS)that such claims are false, and are liable under the False Claims Act therefor. By virtue of these acts Obama _____as representative on behalf of class ____________ in the amount of $_______________, the amount is due and now owing. Wherefore the Plaintiff request judgment in the amount of $_________________and writs of attachments.
CRIMINAL CHARGES, ADJUFICAITON, JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE
CLAIM # I
joe biden in his officia capacity as presidentBARAK H. OBAMA[AKA BARRY SOERTOES]IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS PRESIDENT ON BEHALF OF ALL CLASS DEFENDANTS UNCOVERED US TREASURY PAYMENTS AND/OR MEDICADE PAYMENT
PLAINTIFF RE-ALLEGE THE ABOVE. On or about 2009 and continuing thru present , BARAK H. OBAMA[AKA BARRY SOERTOES]IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS PRESIDENT ON BEHALF OF ALL CLASS DEFENDANTS CONCEALED KNOWN FACTS RETAILATED AGAINST THE PLAINTIFF WHISTLEBLOWERS
Defendant Barak H.Obama[AKA Barry Soertoes] in his official capacity as [Predessors] IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS PRESIDENT ON BEHALF OF ALL CLASS DEFENDANTS and Loretta Lynch in her official capacity, Planned Parenthood, The Federal Reserve, “Class Defendants” and each of them knowingly and willfully conspired and agreed among themselves to engage in activities of which affect, interstate or foreign commerce and to conduct or participate, directly or indirectly, in the conduct of such enterprise’s affairs through a pattern of racketeering activity or collection of unlawful debt advocate and overthrow our constitutional form of Government, breach contracts and international treaties, commit war crimes, commit human rights violations, defraud the United States and submit false claims, support legislation, conspired, aided and abetted Planned Partnerhood to perform abortions, concealed known facts that they were selling fetal tissue and organ of aborted babies on the black market national and/or international for profit and launder money thru bank(owned and operated by the Federal Reserve), discriminate against the Plaintiff Whistleblowers had a fiduary relationship with Barak H. Obama and was discriminated against based on race, class and/or disability, retaliated against, kidnapped, committed human rights violations, assaulted by Obama acts or omissions. knowing that such claims to medicade and/or US Treasury would be submitted to the US Treasury for employed by or associated with any enterprise
Defendant “Class Members,” and each of them did the acts and things herein alleged pursuant to, and in furtherance of, the conspiracy and above-alleged agreement. Defendant class member adopted the acts, committed securities fraud, ___ , furthered the conspiracy by cooperation with [—or— lent aid and encouragement to—-or—ratified and adopted the acts of—-] defendants, ____ in that _______.
1.
2..
<>. As a proximate result of the wrongful acts herein alleged plaintiff___ has___ been generally damaged in the sum of $____.
2) in deliberate ignorance; or
(3) in reckless disregard and submitted claims to the US Treasury for the years of 2010(3.4 Trillion), 2011(3.6 Trillion), 2012(3.5 Trillion), 2013(3.4 Trillion), 2014(3.5 Trillion), 2015(3.6 Trillion) 2016(3.9 Trillion), AND 2017(4.1 Trillion)(US budget for these years can be verfied at www:_____________)which constitute a false claims under the Federal False Claims act, in the amount of $84,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00(EIGHTY FOUR TRILLION DOLLARS)that such claims are false, and are liable under the False Claims Act therefor. By virtue of these acts Obama _____as representative on behalf of class ____________ in the amount of $_______________, the amount is due and now owing. Wherefore the Plaintiff request judgment in the amount of $_________________and writs of attachments.
COMES NOW THE THE STATE of Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming[the District of Columbia, the Common wealth of Puerto Rico, The US Virgin Island, Guam, theNorthern Marianna Islands, the American Samoa] EX REL Sharon Bridgewater (A.K.A. Sharon Abusalem, Sharon Davis) Private Attorney General and RELATOR[ FROM 1993 and continuing thru present]- Real parties in interest the undersigned complaintant says makes the following affirmation under the penalties of perjury, and being duly sworn state the following is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.and that On or about 1785 and continuing thru present and further contining thru present the upon information and belief, the following Federal and/or State crimes did take place in the County of the District of Columbia, Washington D.C., in the County of Gwinnett, State of Georgia, in the County of Dekalb, State of Georgia, in the County of Fulton, State of Georgia, in the County of Oakland, State of California, in the County of San Francisco, State of California, in the County of Washtenaw, State of Michigan and “unknown” cities or towns in the State of Georgia, State of California, State of California, and/or Michigan, and in the County of Wayne, State of Michigan and in the State of California, and/or the “50 States” in “unknown” cities or Towns, and/or in the District of Columbia and/or in the contininial of United States, complains, alleges and appearing before a Federal Judge of the United States, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4, to report these crimes FORMALLY CHARGE
COUNT III
CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT TREASON
by levying war against the USA
by adhering to their enemies,
giving those enemies aid and comfort
within the USA and elsewhere
Beginning on or about Jan. 1, 1993 and continuing thru the filing of this complaint within the District of Columbia and else in the US and/or intentionally, did unlawfully, willfully and knowingly combined, conspire together and with each other, came to the meeting of the minds, entered into an unlawful agreement and/or came to a mutual understanding to accomplish a common and unlawful plan, namely to engage in a “pattern of racketeering activity” to commit_list predicate acts(violate a, b,c) and knowingly and willfully became a member of such conspiracy and futher, at the time, joined such conspiracy, he or she or they did so with the specific intent either to personally engage in at least two incidents of racketeering, as alleged in the Information,______________________ or he or she or they specifically intended to otherwise participate in the affairs of the “enterprise” with the knowledge and intent that other members of the conspiracy would engage in at least two incidents of racketeering, ______________________as alleged in the Information, as part of a “pattern of racketeering act or became a member without full knowledge of of all of the details of the unlawful scheme but has an understanding of the unlawful nature of a plan and knowingly and willfully joins in that plan on one occasion, and played a minor part. In the unlawful scheme.
Conspiracy to
COUNT THREE: Conspiracy to violate 18 U.S.C. 2381
Conspircy to commit treason by levying war against the USA
by adhering to their enemies,
giving those enemies aid and comfort
within the USA and elsewhere
(multiple violations as a principal)
Beginning on or about Jan. 1, 1993 and/or on or about _______ continuing thru the filing of this complaint within the District of Columbia and else in the US and/or international, AKA Queen Elizabeth and/or Charles, did unlawfully, willfully and knowingly combined, conspire together and with each other, and to commit commit multiple federal felonies by levying war against the several States and by adhering to their enemies, giving those enemies aid and comfort within three States of the Union and elsewhere, all in connection with the deaths
TREASON
18 U.S. Code § 2339B – Providing material support or resources to designated foreign terrorist organizations
COUNT SIX: 18 U.S.C.
CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT TREASON
COUNT SIX: 18 U.S.C.
Aiding and Abetting Engaging in a Monetary
Transaction in Property Derived from Specified Unlawful Activity
COUNT SIX: 18 U.S.C.286
Conspiracy to Defraud the United States Government
With Respect to Claims
From in or about 1993 through the present in Fairfax County, Virginia, and elsewhere in Virginia, in the District of Columbia, and Washington, D.C., defendants Barak H. Obama, Eric Holder,Shawn Dovanan, Kathleen Sebious _________, entered into a conspiracy to obtain payment; allowance; aid in obtainingpayment of claims against the United States Department of Treasury,a department of the United States, its Departments, programs or agencies for H defendant,____________________,
a resident of ____________________, made and presented to theUnited States Treasury Department a claim against the United States for payment, which he [she]knew to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent, by [e.g., preparing a budget and causing to be prepared a budget andfiling and causing to be filed, what purported to be a budget to operate the USA, which waspresented to the United States Treasury Department, through the Internal Revenue Service,wherein he [she] claimed [e.g., a refund of taxes]2 in the amount of $_____(Trillion of Dollars) knowing that claim to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent in violation of 18 U.S.C.286.
COUNT SIX: 18 U.S.C.287
False Claim
From in or about ___________, 20__ in Fairfax County, Virginia, and elsewhere in Virginia, in the District of Columbia, and/or Washington, D.C., defendants Barak H. Obama, _________, a resident of the USA, and/or District of Columbia made and presented to theUnited States Treasury Department a claim against the United States for payment, which he he knew to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent by preparing and/or causing to be prepared and submitting a budget what purported to be for to operate the Department of Justice which was presented to the United States Treasury Department of Treasury through the (?)US Congress, taxpayers, ______________1 to deprive undersign counsel of his right to access to an impartial jury trial pursuant to civil RICO and 18 U.S.C. § 1983, as well as to an impartial court under the Federal Tort Claims Act, so to obstruct and cover-up the violations of federal statutory fathers’ rights to compel the extortion____ wherein he was not qualified to hold office and claimed to the right to hold office as US president and/or claimed to be a qualified individual to authorize to spend [e.g., a refund of taxes]2 in the amount of $__________, knowing that claim to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent.defendant,____________________,
a resident of ____________________, made and presented to theUnited States Treasury Department a claim against the United States for payment, which he [she]knew to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent in violation of 18 U.S.C.287.
COUNT SIX: 18 U.S.C.287
False Claim
From in or about ___________, 20__ in Fairfax County, Virginia, and elsewhere in Virginia, in the District of Columbia, and/or Washington, D.C., defendants Eric Holder, _________, a resident of the USA, and/or District of Columbia made and presented to theUnited States Treasury Department a claim against the United States for payment, which he he knew to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent by preparing and/or causing to be prepared and submitting a budget what purported to be for to operate the Department of Justice which was presented to the United States Treasury Department of Treasury through the (?)US Congress, taxpayers, ______________1 to deprive undersign counsel of his right to access to an impartial jury trial pursuant to civil RICO and 18 U.S.C. § 1983, as well as to an impartial court under the Federal Tort Claims Act, so to obstruct and cover-up the violations of federal statutory fathers’ rights to compel the extortion____ wherein he was not qualified to hold office and claimed to the right to hold office as US president and/or claimed to be a qualified individual to authorize to spend [e.g., a refund of taxes]2 in the amount of $__________, knowing that claim to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent.defendant,____________________,
a resident of ____________________, made and presented to theUnited States Treasury Department a claim against the United States for payment, which he [she]knew to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent in violation of 18 U.S.C.287.
SIX: 18 U.S.C.287
False Claim
From in or about ___________, 20__ in Fairfax County, Virginia, and elsewhere in Virginia, in the District of Columbia, and/or Washington, D.C., defendants Shawn Donavan, _________, a resident of the USA, and/or District of Columbia made and presented to theUnited States Treasury Department a claim against the United States for payment, which he he knew to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent by preparing and/or causing to be prepared and submitting a budget what purported to be for to operate the Department of Justice which was presented to the United States Treasury Department of Treasury through the (?)US Congress, taxpayers, ______________1 to deprive undersign counsel of his right to access to an impartial jury trial pursuant to civil RICO and 18 U.S.C. § 1983, as well as to an impartial court under the Federal Tort Claims Act, so to obstruct and cover-up the violations of federal statutory fathers’ rights to compel the extortion____ wherein he was not qualified to hold office and claimed to the right to hold office as US president and/or claimed to be a qualified individual to authorize to spend [e.g., a refund of taxes]2 in the amount of $__________, knowing that claim to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent.defendant,____________________,
a resident of ____________________, made and presented to theUnited States Treasury Department a claim against the United States for payment, which he [she]knew to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent in violation of 18 U.S.C.287
COUNT SIX: 18 U.S.C.287
False Claim
From in or about ___________, 20__ in Fairfax County, Virginia, and elsewhere in Virginia, in the District of Columbia, and/or Washington, D.C., defendants Eric Kathleen Sebibus, _________, a resident of the USA, and/or District of Columbia made and presented to theUnited States Treasury Department a claim against the United States for payment, which he he knew to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent by preparing and/or causing to be prepared and submitting a budget what purported to be for to operate the Department of Justice which was presented to the United States Treasury Department of Treasury through the (?)US Congress, taxpayers, ______________1 to deprive undersign counsel of his right to access to an impartial jury trial pursuant to civil RICO and 18 U.S.C. § 1983, as well as to an impartial court under the Federal Tort Claims Act, so to obstruct and cover-up the violations of federal statutory fathers’ rights to compel the extortion____ wherein he was not qualified to hold office and claimed to the right to hold office as US president and/or claimed to be a qualified individual to authorize to spend [e.g., a refund of taxes]2 in the amount of $__________, knowing that claim to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent.defendant,____________________,
a resident of ____________________, made and presented to theUnited States Treasury Department a claim against the United States for payment, which he [she]knew to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent in violation of 18 U.S.C.287
COUNT SIX: 18 U.S.C.287
False Claim
From in or about ___________, 20__ in Fairfax County, Virginia, and elsewhere in Virginia, in the District of Columbia, and/or Washington, D.C., defendants Hillary Clinton, _________, a resident of the USA, and/or District of Columbia made and presented to theUnited States Treasury Department a claim against the United States for payment, which she knew to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent by preparing and/or causing to be prepared and submitting a budget what purported to be for to operate the Department of State which was presented to the United States Treasury Department of Treasury through the (?)US Congress, taxpayers, ______________1 to deprive undersign counsel of his right to access to an impartial jury trial pursuant to civil RICO and 18 U.S.C. § 1983, as well as to an impartial court under the Federal Tort Claims Act, so to obstruct and cover-up the violations of federal statutory fathers’ rights to compel the extortion____ wherein he was not qualified to hold office and claimed to the right to hold office as US president and/or claimed to be a qualified individual to authorize to spend [e.g., a refund of taxes]2 in the amount of $__________, knowing that claim to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent.defendant,____________________, a resident of ____________________, made and presented to theUnited States Treasury Department a claim against the United States for payment, which he [she]knew to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent in violation of 18 U.S.C.287
COUNT SIX: 18 U.S.C.287
False Claim
From in or about ___________, 20__ in Fairfax County, Virginia, and elsewhere in Virginia, in the District of Columbia, and/or Washington, D.C., defendants Michelle Obama, _________, a resident of the USA, and/or District of Columbia made and presented to theUnited States Treasury Department a claim against the United States for payment, which she knew to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent, by preparing and/or submitting and/or causing to be filed with “White house Travel” what purported to be listed two daughters _____ as “white house staff members” waspresented to the United States Treasury Department, through the Travel Office of the White house, wherein she claimed and/or defrauded the United States Treasury in the amount of $__________, knowing thatclaim to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent in violation of 18 U.S.C.287
COUNT SIX: 18 U.S.C.371
From in or about ___________, 20__ in Fairfax County, Virginia, and elsewhere in Virginia, in the District of Columbia, and/or Washington, D.C., defendants Michelle Obama, _________, a resident of the USA, and/or District of Columbia made and presented to theUnited States Treasury Department a claim against the United States for payment, which she knew to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent, by preparing and/or submitting and/or causing to be filed with “White house Travel” what purported to be listed two daughters _____ as “white house staff members” waspresented to the United States Treasury Department, through the Travel Office of the White house, wherein she claimed and/or defrauded the United States Treasury in the amount of $__________, knowing thatclaim to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent in violation of 18 U.S.C.287.
CLAIM IV
BREACH OF CONTRACT AGAINST THE PUBLIC/PRIVATE “TRANSNATIONAL”
By reason of defendant Loretta Lynch breach of said contract and/or negligence as herein alleged, the plaintiff “the United States et al and/or the “Class Petitioner Representative Bridgewater and/or Class Member has suffered damages in the sum of not less than and not less than 100,000,000,000,000,000(One Hunred Trillion Dollars-class Defendants).
By the terms of said written agreement, the Plaintiff is entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees incurred in the enforcement of the provisions of the agreement. By reason of the aforementioned breach of the defendant Loretta Lynch, the Plaintiff has been forced to “ACT AS PROSECUTOR, TO DEFEND FOR THE UNITED STATES, ET AL,” to collect fines, etc. ) and to recover money and/or property on behalf of the “ United 50 States et al.” Further on or about Nov. 15, 2015 and continuing thru present the Petitioner has sent Loretta Lynch “duly authorized, first class certified mail,” and a number of times since then, plaintiff Bridgewater has demanded Loretta Lynch in her official capacity to stop her wrongful conduct described above. Defendants Loretta Lynch as the United States Attorney General et al , and each of them, have refused and still refuse to refrain from their wrongful conduct.
Defendants Loretta Lynch in her official capacity unless and until enjoined and restrained by order of this court, will cause great and irreparable injury to “the United States et al ,” in that “the United 50 States and/or the Plaintiff will suffer and continue to suffer from deprivation of property and/or money without due process of law in violaton of the United Constitution and/or International laws and treaties.The enterprise “federal officials” joint participation has changed, or altered the movement or ransportation or flow of goods, merchandise, money, or other property between or mong two or more states (between a state and a foreign country).Nature of Trade and Commerce; Real Estate .Holder acted or refused to act on ground generally applicable to the Class
By the aforesaid acts and omissions Defendants caused the damage and _____The United States performed all of its contractual obligations pertaining to the payment via the job of the United States President and/or the United States Attorney General “all officer shall uphold the United States Constitution, ___________faithfully ________, Loretta Lynch prosecute
As a result of the aforesaid acts and omissions, Defendants breached its contractual obligation by failing to perform work as the United States President and the United Statea Attorney General., as a consequence of which the United States is entitled to money damaged in the amount ________
<>. On or about ___, 19__, in the City of ___, County of ___, State of California, Plaintiff and defendant entered into a written agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and made a part hereof. By the terms of said written agreement, ___.
The consideration set forth in the agreement was the fair and reasonable.Plaintiff has performed all conditions, covenants, and promises required by him on his part to be performed in accordance with the terms and conditions of the contract.On or about ___, 19__ the defendant__ breached the said agreement by _____. By reason of defendant__ breach of said contract as herein alleged, the plaintiff__ has__ suffered damages in the sum of $__.By the terms of said written agreement, the Plaintiff is entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees incurred in the enforcement of the provisions of the agreement. By reason of the aforementioned breach of the defendant, the Plaintiff has been forced to “ACT AS PROSECUTOR AND ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE 50 STATES.” WHEREFORE, plaintiff__ pray__ judgment against defendant__ and each of them, as follows:
For compensatory damages in the sum of $___; For interest on the sum of $___ from and after ___, 19__ to date of judgment;For reasonable attorney fees according to proof; For costs of suit herein incurred; and For such other and further relief as the court may deem proper, writs of attachment, arrest warrants,
VIOLATION OF 2ND AMENDMENT RIGHT
BUSH, OBAMA AND HOLDER KNOWINGLY, INTENTIONALLY CAME ON TO MY PREMISES, ARRESTED MY WITHOUT PROBABLE CAUSE STOLE MY GUN AND BUSINESS COMPUTER AND PAPERS, CHARGE ME WITH THEFT BY TAKING AND CONSPIRED WITH JUDGES TO DISMISS EACH AND EVERY ONE OF THE COMPLAINTS I FILED
Current law prohibits individuals from buying a gun if, because of a mental health issue, they are either a danger to themselves or others or are unable to manage their own affairs. The Social Security Administration (SSA) has indicated that it will begin the rulemaking process to ensure that appropriate information in its records is reported to NICS. The reporting that SSA, in consultation with the Department of Justice, records of the approximately 75,000 people each year who have a documented mental health issue, receive disability benefits, federal prohibition on possessing a firearm for reasons related to mental health. There are many disabled people who are receive checks on behalf of disabled people.
- Obama and/or Loretta Lynch conspired under the color of law, breached her duties and/or legal obligations as United States Attorney General, violated her oath of office and further violated the class Plaintiff Second Amendment rights to bear arms a committed a number of other overt acts requiring injunctive relief.
- As a direct and proximate consequence of the Defendants’ actions, Plaintiffs were deprived of certain rights, privileges and immunities secured by the Constitution of the United States of America(Human rights via the Universal Declaration International laws and treaties) the laws of this Nation and the “50 States.” and the Class Plaintiffs 2nd amendment’ Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment rights to procedural and/or substantive due process and equal protection of the laws were violated by the Defendants, together with their Eighth Amendment right proscribing cruel and unusual punishment and their Fourth Amendment right to be free of unreasonable searches and seizures, as well as their First Amendment right to free speech and expression. The Class Plaintiff and/or the Class members lost their ability to earn a living due to the above Defendants conspiracies, conspiracies to defraud the Plaintiffs out of money or property, violence against the Plaintiffs(WOMEN minority business owners), oppression, unfair business practices, unfair competition, conspiracies to restrain commerce, acts of threats, extortion, coercion, force, assault and battery, usurpation of business(is)The Specialty Investment Group LLC dissolved in Sept. 2010, due to the “repeated” conspiracies and/or unlawful attacks to restrain commerce, unfair competition, unfair business practices, repeated, continual violation of the Specialty Investment Group LLC and/or the Plaintiff’s United States Constitutional violations civil rights by the above named Defendants. illegal overt acts by the United States Government the Plaintiff has direct and/or indirectly proximate cause of the Plaintiff’s mental and emotional instability and social security, oppression, deprivation of business and personal property, theft, and anti-competitive conduct of one or more of the Defendants of which conduct, which violates both federal antitrust laws. The United States has been damaged and injured by the overt acts of the Defendants.
I have been unable to drive a car, work, make a living due to the repeated conspiracies of the Defendants. My son is currently on probation, via “threat,” coercion and/or force and is “forced” to pay $800.00 for crimes he did not commit(via concealment and/or acts or omissions of Barak H. Obama and/or Lynch).
CLAIM II
LIBEL
THE ELEMENTS OF LIBEL
- Name and legal description of court before which is brought.
- Name and legal description of Libellant and any offer or function or relationship the libellant may hold it the regret to sustain that action depends upon it, as if he be foreigner claim man any particular ground or him eecitopm guardian which act [tocotu he may he/she may be sued\end at home; or if the libellant be a married women or women with separate personal rights.
- The name and legal description of the person soar the thing against when or which the suit is brought.
- The nature of the cause as that it is civil or maritime contract, or tort or dame or of possession, or otherwise as the case may be and if the libel is in rem, the property is with the district, and if the persona the name and occupation and palaces of resident of the parties.
- The facts upon which the suit is brought.
- That the premises to be within the admiralty and maritime jurisdiction of the United States Courts
- The prayer for the remedies which is situated to the case.
- The prayer for relief or remedy which the libellant seeks by the suit, and which the court is competent to give.
- The process prayed for may be a war of arrest the person of the Defendant in nature of a capital or warrant of arrest with a clause therein, if the Defendant can be found his/her goods and chattels to the amount sue for; or if such an not be found, to attach is credits and effects to the amount sued for in the hands of the garnishees named therein; or an single moment in in nature of a summons to appear and answer to the suit.
Plaintiff brings this case action on behalf of all African Americans, minorities from 1993 and continuing thru present who purchased a vehicle and displayed “drive out tag” as a license plate until they are able to obtain a license plate from the Department of Motor Vehicle and/or Secretary of State and who were pulled over a vehicle who were driving their cars and “pulled over,” and questioned by the police, received a traffic ticket.
Plaintiff brings this case action on behalf of all African Americans, minorities from 1993 and continuing thru present who lived in cities Major cities throughout the United States(Atlanta, Los Angeles, New York, Detroit, Chicago, i.e.)__________________________were assaulted, beaten, arrested, humiliated, falsely imprisonment, maliciously prosecuted without probable cause on the sole account based on race, class, gender, ethnicity, disability, national origin, and by Police Officers on the sole account of race, _____________
During all of the times referred to, Defendant Loretta Lynch (and Processors from 1993 and continuing thru to her term) is a Law Enforcement Officer, and were “Does 2001 thru 1, 000, 000, 000, 000,” police officers stationed at various Police States and members of the Police Department of “cities,” of “the United States.”
The “Class Representative,” and Plaintiff Sharon Bridgewater son James S. Bridgewater , now 33 years of age, is, and at all times mentioned was a Citizen of the United States locations throughout the United States, and a resident of Michigan, and of the Eastern District of Michigan.
Plaintiff was arrested by Defendant _____________________on _________, at___time, and at the Redford Police Department.
The arrest was made without a warrant and the charge was for “Lying to a Police Officer.”
Concealed
The “Class Representative,” and Plaintiff Bridgewater, now 54 years of age, is, and at all times mentioned was a Citizen of the United States locations throughout the United States, and a resident of Michigan, and of the Eastern District of Michigan.
Plaintiff was arrested by Defendant _____________________on _________, at___time, and taken to the Washtenaw County Police Station concerning an alleged “driving ____________________. All arrest were made without a warrant. During one two or more arrest numerous articles of personal and business property were seized by the arresting officers without a warrant and not returned. Despite the “repeated,” “continual,” plea of the Class Plaintiff to return her business or personal property. Plaintiff remained and continues to remain in police custody via “one or more outstanding warrants, “and is unlawful held in violation of the United States Constititituion on the account she is a “Whistleblower, “ and/or federal witness and victim of Racketeering .
At _______time___on _____date, Plaintiff was again on the same charge set forth in paragraph 4 by the Defendant____and other police officers, wrongfully imprisioned, with out a warrant and contrary to the United States Constitution and/or the “50State Statues.” Plaintiff and Class members were taken to the scene of the alleged crime and there questioned by some of the Defendant and {set out acts] of the Defendant by reason of which playoffs was coerced. Plaintiff and Class members was promised medical aid if he/she would sign a confession and was promised that the beatings would cease. Plaintiff then initialed some paper and the beatings ceased. Uniteder compulsion of the beatings and threats previously described and desiring immediate medical aid, the Plaintiff was compelled to testify against him/herself by signing a stating admitting the burglary or some other crime.
Defendants beat plaintiff for the purpose of forcing he/her to make a confession and for the purpose of imposing illegal summary punishment on him/her. Defendant was held incommunicado for a period of over various hours 1-72 hours and the Defendants refused to permit Plaintiff attorney to see or consult with him or her client, the Plaintiff. As a result of the beatings by the Defendant [describe injuries], all in violation of the laws of the United States, as more particularly set for later. The action of Defendants were under color of law.
Title 42 USC section 1985(2) provides in part as follows:” If two or more persons conspire for the purpose of impeding, hindering, obstructing, or defeating in any manner, the due course of justice in any State or Territory, with intent to deny to any citizen the equal protection of the law, or to injure him or his property for lawfully enforcing or attempting to enforce, the right of any person or class of persons, to the equal protection of the laws,”
Subparagraph(3) of the same Section provides as follows: in any case of conspiracy set forth in this section, if one or more persons engaged in conspiracy do, or cause to be done any act in furtherance of the object of the conspiracy, by which another is injured in his person or property, or deprived of having and excising any right or privilege of a citizen of the United States, the party so injured or deprived may have deprivation, against any one or more of the conspirators.”
From Jan. . . .1, 1993 and continuing thru present in the City of _____________Northen District of Georgia, the Defendants entered into a conspiracy with each other, and with other parties whose names are unknown to the Plaintiff, for the purpose of impeding, hindering, obstructing or defeating the due course of justice in the State of Michigan and/or other States with intent to deny the Plaintiff equal protection of the laws and with intent to injure his/her lawfully enforcing or attemptiming to enforce her right to equal protection o f the laws in that the Defendant, pursuant ot the conspiracy caused the Plaintiff to be unlawfully arrested; caused the institution, and continuation thru to present of malicious prosecution agains the Plaintiff; gave and caused to be given perjured testismony resulting in the return of an indictment in the 14A Judicial District Court for the State of Michigan and subsequently warrants and/or wrongful conviction of Plaintiff causing Plaintiff to be falsely imprisioned since Sept. 2007. Which incarceration resulted in loss wages to h___as ______over $__________; persisted in uttering perjured and false testimony in the hearing on numerous habeas corpus and post-conviction petitions filed by plaintiff and heard during _____,_______and______; over_______petitions were filed during the period; the persistence continuing even after the ___Supreme Court affirmed the granting of a new trial to Plaintiff in the return of their mandate to the ___court of _on __date; caused duress and fear of retribution to be exercised on the Plaintiff up to and including____date. Pursuant to the conspiracy, Defendants seriously injured Plaintiff and caused her, by force and violence, to testify against herself by means of a wrongfully obtained confession, with respect to charges against him of which Plaintiff was innocent and which charges constituted a crime under the laws of the state of ______. As a result of the wrongful conduct of the Defendants, carried out under color of law, the Plaintiff was deprived of his/her constitutional rights secured to him/her by the Fourteenth Amndmentot the Untied States Cosntitution. The conspiracy continues to this present date.
In furtherance of the objectives of the conspiracy referred to in the proceding paragraph, the Defendant either did, or cause to be done, the following overt acts: set out the illegal acts
- Unconstitutional Traffic Stops
- D
- D
- E
- C
- C
The acts which Defendants did or caused to be done in furtherance of the conspiracy referred to and described in the preceding paragraphs, injured the body of the Plaintiff permanently and has caused him/her extreme paind and suffering which still continues.
- On or about August 2008 and continuing thru present the Plaintiff claimed an interest in the “Office of the United States Attorney General.”
- On or about Nov. 1, 2007, Public Officers illegally unlawfully deprived and caused injury
- On or about Nov. and continuing thru repeatedly requested the return of her office and business(computer, gun________________)and deprived and/or deprived the Plaintiff equal protection under the law and/or equal privilege and violated the
- by filing multiple complaints against Barak H. Obama and/or Eric Holder alleging libel, peonage, slavery, human rights violation and/or RICO violations
- Caused one or more indictment, grand jury in violation of ________.
- On or about Nov. 2007 and continuing thru present Eric Holder(and those operating under his direction) published and/or posted defamatory information on the DOJ website and/or in the NCIC crime data base that the Class Claimant had been convicted and/or arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol; theft by taking; and further posted mug shots, warrants for arrest and an defamatory posting of an “ARMED AND DANGEROUS,” in the Department of Justice data base[nation wide], [1] without probable cause.
- The entire statement and/or posting is false as it pertains to the Class Plaintiff Bridgewater.
- The described publication and/or posting on the Department of Justice website and data bases are libelous on its face. It clearly expose Plaintiff to hatred, contempt, ridicule and oblguy, because a “ARMED AND DANGEROUS” posting is clearly a posting for “mass murders or extremely dangerous persons such as terrorist or rapist; and charges the Class Plaintiff with having committed a serious crime of murder, rape, etc. [2]
10.. As a proximate result of the above the Plaintiff has suffered lost of reputation, low self esteem, shame, mortification, injury to all to her damage in excess of $100,000,000,000,000.00.
The above describe publication is not privileged because it was published or posted by Defendant Eric Holder in the Department of Justice and upon information and belief with the state of mind of malice, hatred and/or ill will toward the Plaintiff and without probable cause and upon information and belief in retaliation “only because the Plaintiff was the victim of Racketeering (Federal Witness),” and the will to punish the Plaintiff for asserting her legal rights. On or about April 24, 2015, Loretta Lynch (and Barak H.Obama-2009 and continuing thru present) entered into an agreement (express or implied) with the United States Government to faithfully execute duties, and to uphold the United States Constitution._______see
In accord with the provision of the agreement,the Plaintiff (the United States Government) paid Loretta Lynch (and Obama et al) a weekly salary of ________________upon the performance of _____________duties, and to uphold the United States Constitution. Loretta Lynch knew or should have known that such _________is discriminatory, violates the Class Plaintiff civil rights, . Loretta Lynch breached her upon information and belief knowingly, intentionally violated the Plaintiff Civil rights.
Defendant Loretta Lynch and Barry Soetoes and each of the did the acts and things herein alleged pursuant to, and in furtherance of the conspiracy, in that on or about SOn or about Nov. 2007 and continuing thru present Eric Holder(and those operating under his direction) published and/or posted defamatory information on the DOJ website and/or in the NCIC crime data base that the Class Claimant had been convicted and/or arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol; theft by taking; and further posted mug shots, warrants for arrest and an defamatory posting of an “ARMED AND DANGEROUS,” in the Department of Justice data base[nation wide], without probable cause.
- The entire statement and/or posting is false as it pertains to the Class Plaintiff Bridgewater.
- The described publication and/or posting on the Department of Justice website and data bases are libelous on its face. It clearly expose Plaintiff to hatred, contempt, ridicule and oblguy, because a “ARMED AND DANGEROUS” posting is clearly a posting for “mass murders or extremely dangerous people such as terrorist or rapist(BOTH WITNESSES SHARON AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER HAS NO JUVENILLE, MISDEMEANOR OR FELONY RECORD); and charges the Class Plaintiff with having committed a serious crime of murder, rape, etc.
10.. As a proximate result of the above the Plaintiff James S. Bridgewater has suffered lost of reputation, low self esteem, shame, mortification, injury to all to her damage in excess of $10,000.00000000000.
- The above describe publication is not privileged because it was published or posted by Defendant Loretta Lynch in the Department of Justice and upon information and belief with the state of mind of malice, hatred and/or ill will toward the Plaintiff James S. Bridgewaerand without probable cause and upon information and belief in retaliation “only because the Plaintiff was the victim of Racketeering (Federal Witness),” and the will to punish the Plaintiff for asserting her legal rights.
[1] AND CONTINUES TO POST THIS DEFAMATORY INFORMATION.
- [2] There have been multiple, numerous other unlawful acts(complete torture and torment too many to mention during the course of 7-8 years).
[3] AND CONTINUES TO POST THIS DEFAMATORY INFORMATION.
- [4] There have been multiple, numerous other unlawful acts(complete torture and torment too many to mention during the course of 7-8 years).
CLAIM III
NEGILENCE
In any negligence case, the plaintiff bears the burden of proving the existence of a duty owed by the defendant, a breach of that duty, causation, and damage
On or about Jan. 4, 2016 Defendant Lynch and/or obamaperfomed acts that a person of ordinary prudence in the same or similar cicumstances would not have done or she failed to perform acts that a person or ordinary prudence would have done under he same or cimilar circumstance becase she is the United States Attorney General and knew and/or should have known the “Untied States Constitution.” Even further Obama was an instructor at Hardvard “Specializing in constitutional law, he too knew or should have known the the Class Plaintiff were violated. The Class Plaintiff have been injured and damge by the the 2nd amended US Cosntiton rights violations and have damages this amount is due and now owing.
CLAIM IV
BREACH OF CONTRACT AGAINST LORETTA LYNCH IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITY
By reason of defendant Loretta Lynch breach of said contract and/or negligence as herein alleged, the plaintiff “the United States et al and/or the “Class Petitioner Representative Bridgewater and/or Class Member has suffered damages in the sum of not less than and not less than 100,000,000,000,000,000(One Hunred Trillion Dollars-class Defendants).
By the terms of said written agreement, the Plaintiff is entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees incurred in the enforcement of the provisions of the agreement. By reason of the aforementioned breach of the defendant Loretta Lynch, the Plaintiff has been forced to “ACT AS PROSECUTOR, TO DEFEND FOR THE UNITED STATES, ET AL,” to collect fines, etc. ) and to recover money and/or property on behalf of the “ United 50 States et al.” Further on or about Nov. 15, 2015 and continuing thru present the Petitioner has sent Loretta Lynch “duly authorized, first class certified mail,” and a number of times since then, plaintiff Bridgewater has demanded Loretta Lynch in her official capacity to stop her wrongful conduct described above. Defendants Loretta Lynch as the United States Attorney General et al , and each of them, have refused and still refuse to refrain from their wrongful conduct.
Defendants Loretta Lynch in her official capacity unless and until enjoined and restrained by order of this court, will cause great and irreparable injury to “the United States et al ,” in that “the United 50 States and/or the Plaintiff will suffer and continue to suffer from deprivation of property and/or money without due process of law in violaton of the United Constitution and/or International laws and treaties.The enterprise “federal officials” joint participation has changed, or altered the movement or ransportation or flow of goods, merchandise, money, or other property between or mong two or more states (between a state and a foreign country).Nature of Trade and Commerce; Real Estate .Holder acted or refused to act on ground generally applicable to the Class
By the aforesaid acts and omissions Defendants caused the damage and _____The United States performed all of its contractual obligations pertaining to the payment via the job of the United States President and/or the United States Attorney General “all officer shall uphold the United States Constitution, ___________faithfully ________, Loretta Lynch prosecute
As a result of the aforesaid acts and omissions, Defendants breached its contractual obligation by failing to perform work as the United States President and the United Statea Attorney General., as a consequence of which the United States is entitled to money damaged in the amount ________
<>. On or about ___, 19__, in the City of ___, County of ___, State of California, Plaintiff and defendant entered into a written agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and made a part hereof. By the terms of said written agreement, ___.
The consideration set forth in the agreement was the fair and reasonable.Plaintiff has performed all conditions, covenants, and promises required by him on his part to be performed in accordance with the terms and conditions of the contract.On or about ___, 19__ the defendant__ breached the said agreement by _____. By reason of defendant__ breach of said contract as herein alleged, the plaintiff__ has__ suffered damages in the sum of $__.By the terms of said written agreement, the Plaintiff is entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees incurred in the enforcement of the provisions of the agreement. By reason of the aforementioned breach of the defendant, the Plaintiff has been forced to “ACT AS PROSECUTOR AND ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE 50 STATES.” WHEREFORE, plaintiff__ pray__ judgment against defendant__ and each of them, as follows:
For compensatory damages in the sum of $___; For interest on the sum of $___ from and after ___, 19__ to date of judgment;For reasonable attorney fees according to proof; For costs of suit herein incurred; and For such other and further relief as the court may deem proper, writs of attachment, arrest warrants,
CLAIM I
[ RICO ]
BREACH OF CONTRACT
Plaintiff allege that the Defendant Donald Trump in his official capacity breached his contract, the Plaintiff has demanded property and Defendant has failed and refuse and continues to fail and to refuse, to remit the money and/or property although duly demanded requiring immediate injunctive relief and the Plaintiff has been damaged and continues to be damage and have damages as follows:
_____________________ $_______________
This amount is due and now owing, and the Plaintiff is entitled to writ of attachment, judgment in the amount of __________________.
Amount paid $0 Amount due: $______________________.
CLAIM I
[ RICO ]
BREACH OF FIDICARY DUTIES
Plaintiff allege that the Defendant Donald Trump in his official capacity breached his contract, the Plaintiff has demanded property and Defendant has failed and refuse and continues to fail and to refuse, to remit the money and/or property although duly demanded requiring immediate injunctive relief and the Plaintiff has been damaged and continues to be damage and have damages as follows:
_____________________ $_______________
This amount is due and now owing, and the Plaintiff is entitled to writ of attachment, judgment in the amount of __________________.
Amount paid $0 Amount due: $______________________.
CLAIM II
[ RICO ]
CONDUCT AND PARTICIPATION IN A RICO ENTERPRIZE THRU A PATTERN OF
RACKEETEERING ACTIVITY
Plaintiff allege that the Defendant Donald Trump in his official capacity conducted in a Rico Enterprize thru a pattern of Rackeeteering Activity and the plaintiff has been injured and damaged and Plaintiff has demanded property and Defendant has failed and refuse and continues to fail and to refuse, to remit the money and/or property although duly demanded requiring immediate injunctive relief and the Plaintiff has been damaged and continues to be damage and have damages as follows:
_____________________ $_______________
The Plantiff have punitive damages in the amount of $ ________________________. This amount is due and now owing.
This amount is due and now owing, and the Plaintiff is entitled to writ of attachment, judgment in the amount of __________________.
Amount paid $0 Amount due: $______________________.
.
CLAIM III
[ RICO ]
CONSPIRACY TO ENGAGE IN A PATTERN OF RACKEETEERING ACTIVITY:
Plaintiff allege that the Defendant Donald Trump in his official capacity conspired to engage in a pattern of Rackeeterring Activity and the plaintiff has been injured and damaged and Plaintiff has demanded property and Defendant has failed and refuse and continues to fail and to refuse, to remit the money and/or property although duly demanded requiring immediate injunctive relief and the Plaintiff has been damaged and continues to be damage and have damages as follows:
_____________________ $_______________
This amount is due and now owing, and the Plaintiff is entitled to writ of attachment, judgment in the amount of __________________.
Amount paid $0 Amount due: $______________________.
CLAIM IV
[ RICO ]
MALICIOUS PROSECUTION
Plaintiff allege that the Defendant Donald Trump in his official capacity instituted and/or continued a criminal proceeding agains the claimant and the termination of the proceeding ended in the Claimant favor and the plaintiff has been injured and damaged anPlaintiff has demanded property and Defendant has failed and refuse and continues to fail and to refuse, to remit the money and/or property although duly demanded requiring immediate injunctive relief and the Plaintiff has been damaged and continues to be damage and have damages as follows:
_____________________ $_______________
This amount is due and now owing, and the Plaintiff is entitled to writ of attachment, judgment in the amount of __________________.
Amount paid $0 Amount due: $______________________.
CLAIM V
[ RICO ]
VIOLATION OF THE CLAIMANT 5TH AND/OR 9TH AND/OR 10TH AMENDMENT US CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT[42 USC SECTION 1983/1985(3)]
Plaintiff allege that the Defendant Donald Trump in his official capacity acted under the color of law denied and/or deprived the Claimant her 5th and/or 9th and/or 10th Amendment US Constitutional rights and the plaintiff has been injured and damaged anPlaintiff has demanded property and Defendant has failed and refuse and continues to fail and to refuse, to remit the money and/or property although duly demanded requiring immediate injunctive relief and the Plaintiff has been damaged and continues to be damage and have damages as follows:
_____________________ $_______________
This amount is due and now owing, and the Plaintiff is entitled to writ of attachment, judgment in the amount of __________________.
Amount paid $0 Amount due: $______________________.
CLAIM VI
[ RICO ]
LIBEL
Plaintiff allege that the Defendant Donald Trump in his official capacity acted under the color of law conspired with other and “libeled” the Claimant and the plaintiff has been injured and damaged anPlaintiff has demanded property and Defendant has failed and refuse and continues to fail and to refuse, to remit the money and/or property although duly demanded requiring immediate injunctive relief and the Plaintiff has been damaged and continues to be damage and have damages as follows:
_____________________ $_______________
This amount is due and now owing, and the Plaintiff is entitled to writ of attachment, judgment in the amount of __________________.
Amount paid $0 Amount due: $______________________.
CLAIM VII
[ RICO ]
NEGLIENCE
Plaintiff allege that the Defendant Donald Trump in his official capacity was negligent in enforcing unconstitutional, arbiratory law via the March 6, 2017 executive order and the plaintiff has been injured and damaged anPlaintiff has demanded property and Defendant has failed and refuse and continues to fail and to refuse, to remit the money and/or property although duly demanded requiring immediate injunctive relief and the Plaintiff has been damaged and continues to be damage and have damages as follows:
_____________________ $_______________
This amount is due and now owing, and the Plaintiff is entitled to writ of attachment, judgment in the amount of __________________.
Amount paid $0 Amount due: $______________________.
CLAIM VIII
[ RICO ]
PUNITIVE DAMAGE
Plaintiff allege that the Defendant Donald Trump in his official capacity had conscious disregard for the Claimant civil rights and/or Declaration of human rights and the plaintiff has been injured and damaged and has demanded property and Defendant has failed and refuse and continues to fail and to refuse, to remit the money and/or property although duly demanded requiring immediate injunctive relief and the Plaintiff has been damaged and continues to be damage and have damages as follows:
_____________________ $_______________
This amount is due and now owing, and the Plaintiff is entitled to writ of attachment, judgment in the amount of __________________.
Amount paid $0 Amount due: $______________________.
WRIT OF MANDUMUS
CLAIM #V
DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
An actual controversy has arisen and now exists between plaintiff and defendant Loretta E. Lynch in her official capacity as United States Attorney General and/or “the Class Representative Bridgewater,” concerning their respective rights and duties in that plaintiff Representative contends “she at all times mention has been harmed and damaged and continues to be damaged by Loretta Lynch’s actions. This court is now vested with appropriate jurisdiction and power to declare the rights and legal relations of the parties “The United States..et al,” are entitled to the declaration, the declaration to have the force and effect of a final judgment aor decree, and to be reviewable as a final judgment or decree, and further this court may adjudge and decree and declare that the rights and legal relations of the parties to the subject matter here in controversy, in order that the declaration shall have the force and effect of a final judgment and decree.
a. fully vested with the right to prosecute, via the Private Attorney General
Statue (RICO) and/or collect and/or recover fines et al on behalf of the
United States Government .
b. Barak H.Obama(AKA Barry Soertoes) and/or “et als,” can not exert
executive privilege, and declare that the Plaintiff may amend her
complaint to add Barak H. Obama in his individually capacity as United
States President.
c.. “The United States ex rel Sharon Bridgewater Private Attorney General
and/or Qui Tam Relator(Claimant et al )is fully vested with the right to
have a writ of quo warranto issued upon Loretta Lynch in her official
capacity as United States Attorney General.
d. That this court adjudge and decree that Lynch and/or Barak H. Obama
violated the “The United States ex rel Sharon Bridgewater Private
Attorney General and/or Qui Tam Relator(Claimant et al )class Plaintiff
Have the right to pre-judgment attachment in the amount of $!25,000,000,000,000,000.00(Trillion Dollars) for the United States ex rel Sharon Bridgewater Private Attorney General and/or Qui Tam Relator. $_____________________
e. That the Petiititioner is entitled to a summary judgment.
.
CLAIM #VI
INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
B. Irreparable Harm and Balancing of Hardships and E.ties
. On balance, Plaintiff’s hardship
in not being able to express his views and the public interest in protecting speechoutweigh the Government’s interest in suppressing an intimidating symbol.Plaintiffs has demonstrated a strong possibility of irreparable harm absent apreliminary injunction. Millions of US Citizen are even now Marching toward Washington to oust Obama and/or Holder from Office. In order to prevent a National Riot this Court must take actions now to secure the safety and security of the United States of America. The issuance of a pretrial restraining order is not discretionary: if the Government makes the re.red probable cause showing, the court must entertheorder.if not enjoined, will cause immediate and irreparable injury to the United States Government and continued loss of billions of dollars and have asserted claims of already presented sufficient facts to establish the elements of each of the claims there is a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of the plaintiff’s claim.
C. The Injury to Sharon Bridgewater outweigh the harm an injunction may cause Defendants;
The entry of a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction giving Plaintiffs
Writ of attachment, assets, and/or a for the Defendants to post a bond will cause no harm whatsoever to Defendants and the prevention of eviction of camp take notice.
.
D. The granting of the injunction would not harm the public interest.
Where a party demonstrates both the likelihood of success on the merits and irreparable. injury, it almost always will be the case that the public interest will favor the issuance of aninjunction will protect the public interest, protect the US Government from fraudulent false claims and prevent further RICO acts. The Supreme Court has repeatedly emphasized that courts are vested with extensive e.table powers to fashion appropriate remedies to redress unlawful conduct. An example, in Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Bd. of Educ., 402 U.. 1 (1971), the Supreme Court stated: Once a right and a violation have been shown, the scope of a district court’s e.table powers to remedy past wrongs is broad, for breadth and flexibility are inherent in e.tableremedies.“The essence of e.ty jurisdiction has been the power of the Chancellor to do e.ty and to mould each decree to the necessities of the particular case. Flexibility rather than rigidity has distinguished it. The qualities of mercy and practicality have made e.ty the instrument for nice adjustment and reconciliation between the public interest and private needs as well as between competing private claims.” Hecht Co. v. Bowles, 321 U.. 321, 329-330 (1944), also See also Mitchell v. Robert DeMario Jewelry, Inc., 361 U.. 288, 291-92 (1960)
Moreover, the Supreme Court has pointedly ruled that where “the public interest is involved. . . those e.table powers assume an even broader and more flexible character than when only a private controversy is at stake.” Porter v. Warner Holding, Co., 328 U.. 395, 398 (1946). Accord Virginian Ry. Co. v. Sys. Fed’n. No. 40, 300 U.. 515, 552 (1937) (“Courts of e.ty may, and frequently do, go much farther both to give and withhold relief in furtherance of the public interest than they are accustomed to go when only private interests are involved.”) (collecting cases); Golden State Bottling Co. v. NLRB, 414 U.. 168, 179-80 (1973) (same).12
In accordance with these principles, courts have imposed a wide variety of highly
intrusive e.table remedies in institutional reform litigation to remedy constitutional violations and to foster paramount public interests, including various structural reforms.13 Typically in such cases, the e.table relief afforded exceeds an injunction enjoining the proscribed conduct, and also encompasses compelled changes in practices, structural changes and prolonged court-supervision over implementation of the e.table relief. See generally, DOBBS, Vol. Two at 348-353. The United States of America as well as class Plaintiff There are no adequate remedy at law.
CLAIM #VII
MY PRAYER TO GOD IN HEAVEN
Wherefore , IT IS DECREED, ORDER, ADJUDGE
1. THE STATE of Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming[the District of Columbia, the Common wealth of Puerto Rico, The US Virgin Island, Guam, theNorthern Marianna Islands, the American Samoa] EX REL Sharon Bridgewater (A.K.A. Sharon Abusalem, Sharon Davis) Private Attorney General and QUI TAM RELATOR[ FROM 1993 and continuing thru present]- Real parties in interest
CLAIMANT AND/OR PLAINTIFF prays and/or declare that Loretta Lynch Social Security, ATF acts of Jan. 4, 2016 and/or May 9, 2016 unconstitutionally infringes upon Sharon Bridgewater and other class members one or more 2nd 4th, 5th, 9th, 10th, 14th, US Constitional rights amendementthe rights and/or breach her contract as US Attorney General and/or violated her oath of office and committeed a criminal act.
12.. Jugment in the amount of ____________________for claim #1 Libel, order the
Defendants to immediately pay and issue writs of attachment.
13.. Jugment in the amount of ____________________for claim #2 Violation of the Equal
Protection 2nd amendment and Violation of the Right to bear Firearms(US
Constitutional Amendment II), 42 USC SECTION 1983 order the Defendants to
immediately pay and issue writs of attachment.
14.. Judement in the amount of ____________________for claim #3 neglience and order
The Defendants to immediately pay and issue writs of attachment.
15.. Judgment in the amount of ____________________for claim #4 breach of contract
and
order the Defendants to immediately pay and issue writs of attachment.
16.. Declaratory Judgment declaring that Plaintiff is:
a. fully vested with the right to prosecute, via the Private Attorney General
Statue (RICO) and/or collect and/or recover fines et al on behalf of the
United States Government .
b. Barak H.Obama(AKA Barry Soertoes) and/or “et als,” can not exert
executive privilege, and declare that the Plaintiff may amend her
complaint to add Barak H. Obama in his individually capacity as United
States President.
c.. “The United States ex rel Sharon Bridgewater Private Attorney General
and/or Qui Tam Relator(Claimant et al )is fully vested with the right to
have a writ of quo warranto issued upon Loretta Lynch in her official
capacity as United States Attorney General.
d. That this court adjudge and decree that Lynch and/or Barak H. Obama
violated the “The United States ex rel Sharon Bridgewater Private
Attorney General and/or Qui Tam Relator(Claimant et al )class Plaintiff
Have the right to pre-judgment attachment in the amount of $!25,000,000,000,000,000.00(Trillion Dollars) for the United States ex rel Sharon Bridgewater Private Attorney General and/or Qui Tam Relator. $_____________________
e. That the Petiititioner is entitled to a summary judgment.
.
17. .Equitable and/or Injunctive Relief Prejudgment writs of attachment in
$125,000,000,000,000,000.00 Judgment against Loretta
Lynch
THIS COURT USD) to commence Relator’s rehabilitation i.e. food, shelter, clothing, and
transportation, payable by the Office of the U.S. Attorney General, District of
Columbia to the client trust account (Sharon Bridgewater)of the lawyer duly appointed by
16.. udgment in the amount of $ 1,000,000,000,000,000 MILLION DOLLARS
AGAINST LORETTA LYNCH IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY.
18. Partial judgment in the amount of $ ___________________– payment of ten thousand
U.S. Dollars ($10,000.00 )
18.. That this Court liberally construe the RICO laws and thereby find and/or declare that all Defendants have associated with a RICO enterprise of persons and of other individuals who were associated in fact, all of whom did engage in, and whose activities did affect, interstate and foreign commerce in violation of the RICO law at 18 U.S.C. 1962(c) (Prohibited activities).
19..That this Court liberally construe the RICO laws and thereby find that all Defendants have conducted and/or participated, directly or indirectly, in the affairs of said RICO enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity in violation of the RICO laws at 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961(5) (“pattern” defined) and 1962(c) supra.
20. That all Defendants and all of their directors, officers, employees, agents, servants and all other persons in active concert or in participation with them, be enjoined temporarily during pendency of this action, and permanently thereafter, from associating with any RICO enterprise of persons, or of other individuals associated in fact, who do engage in, or whose activities do affect, interstate and foreign commerce.
21.. That all Defendants and all of their directors, officers, employees, agents, servants and all other persons in active concert or in participation with them, be enjoined temporarily during pendency of this action, and permanently thereafter, from conducting or participating, either directly or indirectly, in the conduct of the affairs of any RICO enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity in violation of the RICO laws at 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961(5) and 1962(c) supra.
22.That if Defendant cannot be found within this District then all of their property within this istrict be attached in the sum of $125,000,000,000,000,1,000,000,000.00(one hundred and twenty five trillion and one million dollars, with interest thereon and cost, the sum sued for in this complaint.
23. That judgment be entered against the dfenant in the sum of $$125,000,000,000,000,1,000,000,000.00(one hundred and twenty five trillion and one million dollars, together with interest and costs; and
24. That this Court order the attachment of said property pruusantot he aforesaid provovision of CPLR and FRCP 4(e) and Rule B(1) of the Supplenmtnal Rules for certain Admarility and Maritime claims: and
25. That process in due form of law, according to the practices of this Honorable Court in causes of admirality and maritime jurisprudence, April issue agains the The Federal Reserve, foreign Officials, and all Defndants that all person having or claiming any interest therein be citized to apper and answer under oath, all and singular the matters aforesaid; that Plaitniff have a deree for its damaged aforesaid, with interest and cost; and that the The Federal Reserve, foreign Officials, and all Defndants be condemned and sld to stisfy plaintiff decree;
26. That process in due form of law April issue against B citing it to appear and answer, under oath, all and singular, the matters aforesaid
27. That the Court order, adjudge and decree that Plaitnifff have a decree against B for claim asserted gy plaintiff herein tooether with interest and costs and
28. To issue an order to the U.S. Department of Justice Loretta Lynch to show cause why she should not be held in criminal and/or civil contempt of court.
29. To attachment of said property pruusantot he aforesaid one or more supplemental rule B, C, D, E and/or F, 4(e) and Rule B(1) of the Supplenmtnal Rules for certain Admarility and Maritime claims: and/or
30. That process in due form of law, according to the practices of this Honorable Court in causes of admirality and maritime jurisprudence, intangible and/or tangible property in and up to the amount of $$125,000,000,000,000,1,000,000,000.00(one hundred and twenty five trillion and one million dollars, and that all person having or claiming any interest therein be citized to apper and answer under oath, all and singular the matters aforesaid; that Plaitniff have a deree for its damaged aforesaid, with interest and cost; and that the $$125,000,000,000,000,1,000,000,000.00(one hundred and twenty five trillion and one million dollarsbe condemned and sld to stisfy plaintiff decree;
- That process in due form of law April issue against B citing it to appear and answer, under oath, all and singular, the matters aforesaid;
- That the Court order, adjudge and decree that Plaitnifff have a decree against B for claim asserted gy plaintiff herein tooether with interest and costs and
- That Plaintiff have such other and further relief as April be proper and that this Court scompettnetotgrnt.
- That Plaintiff have such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, under the full range of relevant circumstances which have occasioned the instant action.
- WRIT OF ATTACHMENT in the amount of Plaitniffs damages, tighter with interest thereon form the rrespective dates due, cost, disbursements, and reasonable attorney fees.
- That process in due form of law according to the practice of this court in cases of admirality and maritime jurisdiction April issue against the Defendant cititng it to apprear and answer all the matters described in this complaint.
- Plaintiff have such other and further relief in the premises as in law and justice in April be entitled to receive.
(7) Order directing the U.S. Marshals Service to expedite Relator’s safe passage to Detroit,
Michigan(home) 12070 W. Outer Drive, Detroit, Michigan 48223 USA; and,
(8) any and all other relief which this Court deems just and proper under the several circumstances
which have occasioned the instant INITIAL APPLICATION e.g. Habeas Corpus relief,WRITS
OF MANDUMUS(EXPUNGEMENT OF ARREST WARRANTS, ETC.), AND relief
from retaliatory actions, triple damages etc.
- For judgment in the amount of Plaitniffdamgestogher with interettheron form the resptice dates due, cost, disburements, and reasonable attorney feees.
- Declare that Lynch actions are illegal and unlawful in that she can not obstruct justice and/or a congressional investigation .
- Declare thatthePlaintiff Bridgewater is unlawful held against her will and each and every arrest warrant of the Plaintiff is illegal and are void.
- Declare that the Plaintiff Sharon and/or James Bridgewater is unlawful imprisoned against her will under the State of Michigan and Georgia, and/or California law.
- Declare that Holder cannot withhold any information pertaining to this complaint, allegations, and the Plaintiff “Sharon Bridgewater” is entitled to injunctive relief
- Declare that Lynch and/or Holder must produce all documents relating to any and all allegations made by the Plaintiffs and/or the Committeee and Oversight.
- Deckare that Lynch is disqualified and/or declare that the Platniff Bridgewater can prosecute this action.
- Under federal rules of Criminal Procedure – Rule 6, submit the name of Respondant Barak H. Obama in his official capacity, Loretta Lynch in her official capacity, Hillary Clinton “respondants,” and all other co-conspirator to a federal grand jury for [included common law grand jury letter-to all judges]for the crime of advocating the overthrow of the Constituional form of government of the United States, Treason, etc.(5 USC 3331, 5 USC 3333, 18 usc 1918 and Executive order No.s
- Accordingly, all premises having been duly considered here, the United States now moves the Honorable Justices of this District Court for an ORDER to the 17A District Court to show cause why Extraordinary Writs of Mandamus should not issue, commanding that Circuit Court to perform ‑‑ with all deliberate speed ‑‑ all duties owed to Appellant as specifically itemized above, beginning with a Habeas Corpus and/or Writs of mandamus to expunge arrest etc.
- The United States moves for said ORDER, on the strengths of this PETITION and of the official records that are now before this Court, to reinstate a cause erroneously dismissed.
grant the Petitioner all just and appropriate relief as deemed by this court.
I certify and/or Declare and/or state under penalty and perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed 1STday of August 2016 in Detroit, Michigan
_____________________________________
THE STATE of Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming[the District of Columbia, the Common wealth of Puerto Rico, The US Virgin Island, Guam, theNorthern Marianna Islands, the American Samoa] EX REL Sharon Bridgewater (A.K.A. Sharon Abusalem, Sharon Davis) Private Attorney General and QUI TAM RELATOR[ FROM 1993 and continuing thru present]- Real parties in interest
_____________________
- Accordingly, all premises having been duly considered here, the United States now moves the Honorable Justices of this District Court for an ORDER to the 17A District Court to show cause why Extraordinary Writs of Mandamus should not issue, commanding that Circuit Court to perform ‑‑ with all deliberate speed ‑‑ all duties owed to Appellant as specifically itemized above, beginning with a Habeas Corpus and/or Writs of mandamus to expunge arrest etc.
- The United States moves for said ORDER, on the strengths of this PETITION and of the official records that are now before this Court, to reinstate a cause erroneously dismissed.
- ISSUE AGAINST Defendants Loretta Lynch be cared to appear and answer the allegation of this Complaint;
- Issue a Writ of Qi Warrantor Loretta L. Lynch
- Private Attorney General, hereby exercises its statutory and appeal and moves this honorable Court for a Writ in the nature of Quo Warrantor to issue upon Loretta E. Lynching her official capacity as United States Attorney General to demonstrate by what lawful authorities each claims to preside as the United States of American Attorney General Intervener also moves this honorable Court for a routine ORDER to the District Court Clerk, commanding that Office formally to certify to the United States Attorney General formal commanding that Office formally to certify appellant for presentation of all evidence admissible in the instant appeal, and for argument(s) on the questions of the constitutionality of the above.
- That this Court liberally construe the RICO laws and thereby find and/or declare that all Defendants have associated with a RICO enterprise of persons and of other individuals who were associated in fact, all of whom did engage in, and whose activities did affect, interstate and foreign commerce in violation of the RICO law at 18 U.S.C. 1962(c) (Prohibited activities).
- That this Court liberally construe the RICO laws and thereby find that all Defendants have conducted and/or participated, directly or indirectly, in the affairs of said RICO enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity in violation of the RICO laws at 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961(5) (“pattern” defined).
- That all Defendants and all of their directors, officers, employees, agents, servants and all other persons in active concert or in participation with them, be enjoined temporarily during pendency of this action, and permanently thereafter, from associating with any RICO enterprise of persons, or of other individuals associated in fact, who do engage in, or whose activities do affect, interstate and foreign commerce.
- That all Defendants and all of their directors, officers, employees, agents, servants and all other persons in active concert or in participation with them, be enjoined temporarily during pendency of this action, and permanently thereafter, from conducting or participating, either directly or indirectly, in the conduct of the affairs of any RICO enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity in violation of the RICO laws at 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961(5) .
- That if Defendant cannot be found within this District then all of their property within this district be attached in the sum of $________________________________, with interest thereon and cost, the sum sued for in this complaint.
- That judgment be entered against the defendant in the sum of $_________________together with interest and costs; and
- If for any reason it is alleged and/or found that Plaintiff is not entitled to the attachment of the Defendants property under Admiralty principle of foreign attachment, then in the, Plaintiff invokes the revision of Section 6201 to 6226 of the New York CPLR (and/or similar “50 State laws”).
- this honorable Court for a Writ in the nature of Quo Warrantor to issue upon Loretta E. Lynching her official capacity as United States Attorney General to demonstrate by what lawful authorities claims to preside as the United States of American Attorney General commanding that Office formally to certify to the United States Attorney General formal and the Intervener also moves this Court for a routine ORDER to the District Clerk, commanding that Office formally to certify Intervener’s intervention for presentation of all evidence admissible in the instant appeal, and for argument(s) on the questions of the constitutionality of the above.
- All premises having been duly considered, Intervener respectfully requests this honorable Court to issue a routine ORDER to the U.S. Department of Justice Loretta E. Lynch to show because why she should not be held in criminal and/or civil contempt of court.
- ate and prays that this Court order the attachment of said property pursuant to the aforesaid provision of CPLR and FRCP 4(e) and Rule B(1) of the Supplenmtnal Rules for certain Admarility and Maritime claims: and
- That process in due form of law, according to the practices of this Honorable Court in causes of admirality and maritime jurisprudence, April issue agains the The Federal Reserve, foreign Officials, and all Defndants that all person having or claiming any interest therein be citized to apper and answer under oath, all and singular the matters aforesaid; that Plaitniff have a deree for its damaged aforesaid, with interest and cost; and that the The Federal Reserve, foreign Officials, and all Defndants be condemned and sld to stisfy plaintiff decree;
- That process in due form of law April issue against B citing it to appear and answer, under oath, all and singular, the matters aforesaid;
- That the Court order, adjudge and decree that Plaitnifff have a decree against B for claim asserted gy plaintiff herein tooether with interest and costs and
- That Plaintiff have such other and further relief as April be proper and that this Court s compettnet ot grnt.
- That process in due form of law according to thepractice of this Honorable Court issue against the Defndants, citing them to appear and answer under oath all and singular the matters aforesaid;
- Declare that Loretta E. Lynchaction constitute conspiracy under the color of law, and declare that Lynch is ineligle and/or disqualified as United States Attorney General.
- Declare Obama can not exert executive privledge.
- Judgment against Loretta LynchPrejudgment writs of Attachment for $100,000,000,000,0000,000(One Hundred Trillion Dollars via Loretta E. Lynch“Class Representative,”Million Dollars and prejudgment writ of attachment for and Judgment against Barak Obama in her official capacity et al for $100,000,000,0000,0000 judgment for its damges with interest and costs, agisnt the Defenants; and
- That this court grant Plaintiff such other and further relief as the justice of the cause April appear.
- To issue an order to the U.S. Department of Justice Loretta E. Lynchto show cause why she should not be held in criminal and/or civil contempt of court.
- To attachment of said property pruusant ot he aforesaid provovision of CPLR and FRCP 4(e) and Rule B(1) of the Supplenmtnal Rules for certain Admarility and Maritime claims: and/or
- That process in due form of law, according to the practices of this Honorable Court in causes of admirality and maritime jurisprudence, April issue agains the stem ship, her enginces, tacke appearl. Etc. and that all person having or claiming any interest therein be citized to apper and answer under oath, all and singular the matters aforesaid; that Plaitniff have a deree for its damaged aforesaid, with interest and cost; and that the steamship__________be condemned and sld to stisfy plaintiff decree;
- That process in due form of law April issue against B citing it to appear and answer, under oath, all and singular, the matters aforesaid;
- That the Court order, adjudge and decree that Plaitnifff have a decree against B for claim asserted gy plaintiff herein tooether with interest and costs and
- That Plaintiff have such other and further relief as April be proper and that this Court s compettnet ot grnt.
- That Plaintiff have such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, under the full range of relevant circumstances which have occasioned the instant action.
- All other relief in which this court may deem just and appropriate.
- Burification and/or Burificate all claims for relief .
- The Plaintiff request this court to tranfer and consolidate all related casesand further that this court issue a Writ of Certiorari in this cause requiring Defendants to file the record of all matters relating to this decision with the Court; (b) that the Court issue an emergency stay of enforcement of the decision pending review on the merits in this causeand that the Court review the decision of the Defendants, that the final administrative decision be reversed, and for such other relief as this court deems just.
- Accordingly, all premises having been duly considered here, the United States now moves the Honorable Justices of this District Court of Columbia for Loretta E. Lynchto show cause why Extraordinary Writs of Mandamus should not issue, commanding that Circuit Court to perform ‑‑ with all deliberate speed ‑‑ all duties owed to Appellant and/or Committee and Oversight.
- The United States moves for said ORDER, on the strengths of this PETITION and of the official records that are now before this District Court of Columbia, to reinstate a cause erroneously dismissed.
- That process ISSUE AGAINST Loretta E. Lynch be cired to appear and answer the allegatioin of this Complaint.
- Issue a Writ in the nature of Quo Warranto to issue upon Loretta E. Lynchin her official capacity as United States Attorney General to demonstrate by what lawful authorities each claims to preside as the United States of American Attorney General .
- All premises having been duly considered, Intervenor respectfully requests this honorable Court to issue a routine ORDER to the U.S. Department of Justice Loretta E. Lynchto show cause why she should not be held in criminal and/or civil contempt of court.
- To appoint Special Prosecutors and/or issue arrest warrants.
- That this Court liberally construe the RICO laws and thereby find and/or declare that all Defendants have associated with a RICO enterprise of persons and of other individuals who were associated in fact, all of whom did engage in, and whose activities did affect, interstate and foreign commerce in violation of the RICO law at 18 U.S.C. 1962(c) (Prohibited activities).
- That this Court liberally construe the RICO laws and thereby find that all Defendants have conducted and/or participated, directly or indirectly, in the affairs of said RICO enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity in violation of the RICO laws at 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961(5) (“pattern” defined) and 1962(c) supra.
- That all Defendants and all of their directors, officers, employees, agents, servants and all other persons in active concert or in participation with them, be enjoined temporarily during pendency of this action, and permanently thereafter, from associating with any RICO enterprise of persons, or of other individuals associated in fact, who do engage in, or whose activities do affect, interstate and foreign commerce.
- That all Defendants and all of their directors, officers, employees, agents, servants and all other persons in active concert or in participation with them, be enjoined temporarily during pendency of this action, and permanently thereafter, from conducting or participating, either directly or indirectly, in the conduct of the affairs of any RICO enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity in violation of the RICO laws at 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961(5) and 1962(c) supra.
- That if Defendant cannot be found within this District then all of their property within this istrict be attached in the sum of $________________________________, with interest thereon and cost, the sum sued for in this complaint;
- That judgment be entered against the dfenant in the sum of $_________________together with interest and costs; and
- If for any reason it is alleged and/or found that Plaintiff is not entitled to the attachment of the Dfenants property under Admirality principle of foreign attachment, then in the, Plaintiff invokes the rovision of Section 6201 to 6226 of the New Yor CPLR(and/or similar “50 State laws”).
- Title 18 U.S.C. §§ 2(a), 2(b), 1341, 1343, 1346, 1952, 1956, 1957,
- 2314, and 2315.
- ate and prays that this Court order the attachment of said property pruusant ot he aforesaid provovision of CPLR and FRCP 4(e) and Rule B(1) of the Supplenmtnal Rules for certain Admarility and Maritime claims: and
- That Plaintiff April have such other and further relief as in lawq and justice tit April be entitle to receive.
Wherefore, Plaintiff prays;
- That process in due form of law, according to the practices of this Honorable Court in causes of admirality and maritime jurisprudence, April issue agains the stem ship, her enginces, tacke appearl. Etc. and that all person having or claiming any interest therein be citized to apper and answer under oath, all and singular the matters aforesaid; that Plaitniff have a deree for its damaged aforesaid, with interest and cost; and that the steamship__________be condemned and sld to stisfy plaintiff decree;
- That process in due form of law April issue against B citing it to appear and answer, under oath, all and singular, the matters aforesaid;
- That the Court order, adjudge and decree that Plaitnifff have a decree against B for claim asserted gy plaintiff herein tooether with interest and costs and
- That Plaintiff have such other and further relief as April be proper and that this Court s compettnet ot grnt.
That Plaintiff have such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, under the full range of relevant circumstances which have occasioned the instant action. Judgment WRIT OF ATTACHMENT in the amount of Plaitniffs damages, tighter with interest thereon form the rrespective dates due, cost, disbursements, and reasonable attorney fees.
- That process in due form of law according to the practice of this court in cases of admirality and maritime jurisdiction April issue against the Defendant cititng it to apprear and answer all the matters described in this complaint.Plaintiff have such other and further relief in the premises as in law and justice in April be entitled to receive.
SCHEDULE[DESIGNATION OF SCHEDULE]
- Defendant’s Status and addresss:
- A. Unpon information and belief and at all times hereinafter mentioned, Defendant Barak H. Obama(AKA Barry Soertoes) class representative was a [type of legaly entity]authorized under the laws of the United States Constition, with offices and a place of business at [Obama address]
DETAILS OF THE _________(S)
- Bill of Lading No.{ number of bill} dated {dated of bill of lading – 1993 thru present] from [name of citiy], [name of county] to [name of city], [name of state] on the vessel [name of vessel], [one(1) container SAID TO CONTAIN: [description of contents], at the applicable tariff charge of $____________dollar amount of ttarriff charge EXhits { of exhibit}
Amount Paid: Amount Due:____________
SUMMARY OF DAMAGES
Summary of Reasonable Counsel’s Fees: TBA
Summary of Consequential Damages: TBA
Summary of Actual Damages (partial list):
unpaid professional invoices: $ 10,000.000000000000000
triple damage multiplier (3x): $ 325,050.0000000000000000
copyright infringements, actual: $163,800,000.00000000000000
triple damage multiplier (3x): $491,400,000.0000000000000000
Subtotal: $11111,310,833,400.00
TOTAL DAMAGES (minimum): $5,243,333,600.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
COMES NOW SHARON[DAVIS- ABUSALEM]BRIDGEWATER VIA “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PEOPLE OF THE 50 STATES(AND/OR HUMANITY)AND CLERK, JUDGE, JURY, PROSECUTOR, “U.S. MARSHAL”(18 U.S. Code § 3053 – Powers of marshals and deputies” AND/OR 8 U.S. Code § 566) PURUSANT TO AND EXECUTIONER PURSUANT TO LEGAL RIGHT VIA THE RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATON ACT(RICO) AND/OR ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME LAW GIVE NOTICE OF FORFEITURE OF ALL TANGIBLE AND INTANGIBLE PROPERTY(INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ALL “SECRET” CONCENTRATION CAMPS, “BOX RAILROAD-TRACK TRAIN CARS FOR THE TRANSPORTATION OF “THE FINAL HOLOCAUST VICTIMS,” GUILLOTINES, FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT(FEMA) CASKETS “MILLIONS” – SEE BELOW)YESHUA/JESUS CHRIST, REPRESENTATIVE OF THE TWELVE TRIBES OF ISRAELAPPEARS BEFORE “THE GOD OF THE EARTH” JACOB ROTHCHILD(SATAN’S REPRESENTATIVE – THE GOD OF THIS EARTH, THE THIRTEENTH BLOOD LINES, SATANIST, FATHER OF LIES, DECEPTION, CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD THE TWO SHARON[DAVIS-ABUSALEM] BRIDGEWATER VIA”THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR(A WOMEN AND VICTIM OF TRUMP, GARLAND, BIDEN, HARRIS, OBAMA “U.S. GOVERNMENT STATE ACTORS” CONTINUAL VIOLENCE AND OPPRESSION, RENDERED DISABLED BY THEIR HEINOUS ACTS OR OMISSION FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING TO JAN. 1, 2009 AND FURTHER CONTINUING THRUINTENTIONAL” CONTINUAL VIOLENCE AND OPPRESSION BY PRESENT)AND THE SHARON[DAVIS-ABUSALEM] BRIDGEWATER VIA”THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR(A )(SEE REVELATION 12 – ALSO SEE AMERICA JUDGED ON THIS WEBSITE– SEPTEMBER 23, 2017) BEFORE, STATUE OF LIMITATIONS TOLLED
THE CLAIM
NOTICE OF ADJUDIFICATION, OF CONVICTION, JUDGMENT AND SENTENCING AS FOLLOWS:
IT IS DECREED, ORDED AND AJUJECTS THAT ALL ALL PRESIDENTS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT ARE ALL GUILTY OF TREASON, RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY AND, ALL ILLEGALLY UPURPS PUBLIC OFFICE
ALL WRITS, OPINION, JUDGMENTS ORDERS ARE NULL AND VOID AND WITHOUT ANY LEGAL EFFECT, CONTRACTS WITH THE ENEMY ARE
DECREE, ENJOINS AND RESTRAIN BIDEN, VIA ARREST, AND IMPRISONMENT
ARREST WARRANTS IN REM
INJUNCTION AND ARREST WARRANT FOR BIDEN HERE(18 U.S.C. section 912, treason, racketeering conspiracy, genocide violation ofthe number
Biden aobstrcution of justice , trump, garland, biden and the marogo raid special master – aiding and betting18 U.S.C. 2382 – jan. 6,
degreed that all inflitrate the racketeer u.s. presidental ecetions via null and void and without any leady e
Adjudications are by their nature retroactive applications of the law.
ATTACHMENT – ARREST WARRANTS HERE
THE CLAIM
(AGAINST THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP)
(A public private/partnership)
EXH.A
.
BIDEN AND HARRIS CONSPIRED WITH ONE OR MORE MERRICK GARLAND, XI JIPING, RUSSIA PUTIN, DONALD TRUMP AND WILLIAM BARR TO DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES IS EQUALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR REBELLION AND/OR INSURRECTION IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S. Code § 2383(SEE BELOW) CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD THE U.S.A. IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 371, VIOLATIONS OF THE NUREMBERG CODE, RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY, VIOLENT CRIMES IN AID OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY, FALSE IMPRISONMENT, FALSE ARREST, ILLEGALLY AND WRONGFULLY HOLDING THE OFFICE OF THE U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL BY FORCE AND WITHOUT THE RIGHT, PRETENDING TO BE AN OFFICER OR EMPLOYEE OF THE UNITED STATES IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 912 AND HOST OF OTHER CRIMES SEE BELOW: 18 U.S. Code § 912 – Officer or employee of the United States, A HOST OF OTHER CRIMES SEE BELOW:
Plaintiff_____________is informed and believes_and therfoon allesges ____________that at all times herein mentioned, each of he Defendands sued herein was the agent and employees of each of the remaining defendant and was at times acting within the purpose and scope of such gency and employment.
On or about ____________1993 Defendant_and each of them knowily and willfully conspired and agreed among themselves to ______________________.
[Here and in subsequtent paragraphs as necessary, allege facts constitutiong the tort or other civil worng committed by caused to the plaintiff._.
Defendnat _and each of them did the acts and things herein alleged pursuant ot, and infurtherance of the conspiracy of the above alleged agreement.
Defendant _______and each of them did the acts and things herein alleged pursuant ot, and infurtherance of the conspiracy and above-allege agreement.
Cooperation with or leent aid and encouragement to or ratified and adopted the acts of Defendant Obama in that _______________.
As a proximate result of the wrongful acts herein alleged Plaintiff___________has ______________has _been generally damed in the sum of ____________.
JAN. 6, 2021 TRUMP
REBELLION OR INSURRECTION 18 U.S. Code § 2383(HE HAD A LEGAL DUTY AS PRESIDENT TO CALL THE NATIONAL GUARDS TO PROTECT OUR U.S. CAPITOL)AND FAILED TO!! TRUMP IS GUILTY OF AIDING, ABETTING PUTIN 2016 ELECTIONS, AND
CLICK HERE FOR BIDEN, TRUMP, GARLAND MAR-A-LARGO RAID CONSPIRACY
AND
JUDGE SPECIAL MASTER ORDER TO “PROTECT EACH OTHER AND/OR THE RACKETEERING CRIMINAL ENTERPRIZE” AS DEFINED IN 18 U.S. Code § 1961(4)!!”
COMES NOW THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY AND/OR RELATOR, INJURED AND DAMAGED IN BUSINESS, PERSON OR PROPERTY, RESTRAINED FROM INTERSTATE AND/OR FOREIGN COMMERCE FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO BIDEN’S TERM]JOE BIDEN & KAMALA HARRIS FAILURE TO PROTECT U.S. BOARDERS(AND HIS PREDECCESSORS ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, RACKETEERING IMMIRGARATION POLICIES ALL U.S. CE
& VIOLATING AND/OR COMMITTING ONE OR MORE SECTION 1961(1)(F)THE IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY ACT – RACKETEERING OFFENSES – BRING IN AND/OR HARBOR ILLEGAL ALIENS INDICTABLE UNDER THE INMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY ACT, I.E, SECTION 274
AID, ABET AND ASSIST ALIENS TO ENTER THE U.S.A. IN VIOLATION OF 277 or section 278 (relating to importation of aliens for immoral purposes) FOR FINANCIAL GAIN AS CODIFIED 8 U.S.C. §§ 1324, 1327 and 1328(FOR PROFIT)FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BORDERS AS FOLLOWS:
- VIOLATING AND/OR COMMITTING ONE OR MORE SECTION 1961(1)(F)THE IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY ACT – RACKETEERING OFFENSES – BRING IN AND/OR HARBOR ILLEGAL ALIENS INDICTABLE UNDER THE INMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY ACT, I.E, SECTION 274
- AID, ABET AND ASSIST ALIENS TO ENTER THE U.S.A. IN VIOLATION OF 277 or section 278 (relating to importation of aliens for immoral purposes) FOR FINANCIAL GAIN AS CODIFIED 8 U.S.C. §§ 1324, 1327 and 1328.
Biden(AN ILLEGAL IMMIGRATE – SEE OBAMA PAGE – ALL JUDGES DISMISSED ALL PLAINTIFFS ENTITLED “PLAINTIFFS” VS. BARAK H. OBAMA A.K.A BARRY SOERTOES EXACTLY LIKE THEY DISMISSED ALL MY COMPLAINT OVER THE COURSE OF NON-STOP CONTINUAUL ENTITLED SHARON BRIDGEWATER VS. BARAK H. OBAMA) DACA Obama Anemsty Program(IS NOW BIDEN AND HARRIS OPEN BORDER DOOR POLICY-SEE BELOW) constitute aiding and/or assisting certain aliens to enter the United States in violation of one or more section 1324, 1327, and/or 1328
KAMALA HARRIS CO-CONSPIRATOR ACTS OR OMISSIONS CONSTITUTE AIDING, ABETTING OR CONSPIRING WITH JOE BIDE TO ALLOW IMMIGRATES IN TO THE U.S. TO FUTHER THE “INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL ENTERPRIZE AGENDA!!”
IMMIGRATION IN THE U.S.A. HIT A RECORD 46.2 MILLION(THE HIGHEST RECORDED IN U.S. HISTORY)IN ONE MONTH!!
CLIKC HERE FOR ARREST WARRANT AND INJUNCTION FOR KAMALA HARRIS AND GAVIN NEWSOME AS FOLLOWS
ALL UNDER ARREST ARE SENTENCE TO LIFE IN PRISION AND/OR THE DEATH PENALITY!!
MERRICK GARLAND THE U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL AND HEAD OF THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AND THE “HEAD(OVERSEE)AND” OF THE EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMRIGATION REVIEW. The primary mission of the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) is to adjudicate immigration cases by fairly, expeditiously, and uniformly interpreting and administering the Nation’s immigration laws. Under delegated authority from the Attorney General, EOIR conducts immigration court proceedings, appellate reviews, and administrative hearings.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
The Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) was created on January 9, 1983, through an internal Department of Justice (DOJ) reorganization which combined the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA or Board) with the Immigration Judge function previously performed by the former Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) (now part of the Department of Homeland Security). Besides establishing EOIR as a separate agency within DOJ, this reorganization made the Immigration Courts independent of INS, the agency charged with enforcement of Federal immigration laws. The Office of the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer (OCAHO) was added in 1987. In 2013, EOIR observed its 30th anniversary.
EOIR is also separate from the Immigration and Employee Rights Section in the DOJ Civil Rights Division and the Office of Immigration Litigation in the DOJ Civil Division.
As an office within the Department of Justice, EOIR is headed by a Director who reports directly to the Deputy Attorney General. Its headquarters are located in Falls Church, Virginia, about 10 miles from downtown Washington, DC.
MERRICK GARLAND ACTS OR OMISSIONS AND FAILURE TO “OVERSEE” HIS STAFF ACTS OR OMISSIONS AND/OR FAILURE TO MAINTAIN OUR BORDERS, CONSTITUTE
VIOLATING AND/OR COMMITTING ONE OR MORE SECTION 1961(1)(F)THE IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY ACT – RACKETEERING OFFENSES – BRING IN AND/OR HARBOR ILLEGAL ALIENS INDICTABLE UNDER THE INMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY ACT, I.E, SECTION 274
AID, ABET AND ASSIST ALIENS TO ENTER THE U.S.A. IN VIOLATION OF 277 or section 278 (relating to importation of aliens for immoral purposes) FOR FINANCIAL GAIN AS CODIFIED 8 U.S.C. §§ 1324, 1327 and 1328(FOR PROFIT)AND THE TWO WITNESSES(BOTH SHARON AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER) HAVE BEEN INJURED AND DAMAGED BY GARLAND ACTS OR OMISSIONS AND GARLAND IS LIABLE FOR DAMAGES
DECREE,ORDER, ENJOINS AND RESTRAIN MERRICK GARLAND FROM ILLEGALLY, UNLAWFULLY UPURPING THE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL WITHOUT THE RIGHT AS FOLLOWS:
KAMALA HARRIS(VICE PRESIDENT), NANCY PEOLOSI(SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE), CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR GAVIN NEWSOME, FLORIDA GOVERNOR RON DESANTIS AND/OR SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE NANCY PELOSI IMMIGRATION RACKETEERINGACTS OR OMISSIONS IMMIGRATION AND RACKETEERING(INJUNCTION AND ARREST WARRANT)!!
ACTS OR OMISSIONS AND FAILURE TO MAINTAIN OUR BORDERS, CONSTITUTE
VIOLATING AND/OR COMMITTING ONE OR MORE SECTION 1961(1)(F)THE IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY ACT – RACKETEERING OFFENSES – BRING IN AND/OR HARBOR ILLEGAL ALIENS INDICTABLE UNDER THE INMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY ACT, I.E, SECTION 274
AID, ABET AND ASSIST ALIENS TO ENTER THE U.S.A. IN VIOLATION OF 277 or section 278 (relating to importation of aliens for immoral purposes) FOR FINANCIAL GAIN AS CODIFIED 8 U.S.C. §§ 1324, 1327 and 1328(FOR PROFIT)AND THE TWO WITNESSES(BOTH SHARON AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER) HAVE BEEN INJURED AND DAMAGED BY GARLAND ACTS OR OMISSIONS AND GARLAND IS LIABLE FOR DAMAGES
CLICK HERE FOR GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA RON DESANTIS AND/OR SPEAKER OF THE HOUS NANCY PELOSI IMMIGRATION RACKETEERING INJUNCTION AND/OR ARREST WARRANTS!!
DECREE,ORDER, ENJOINS AND RESTRAIN GAVIN NEWSOME FROM ILLEGALLY, UNLAWFULLY UPURPING THE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL WITHOUT THE RIGHT AS FOLLOWS:
WITH F JOE BIDEN[KAMALA HARRIS, MERRICK GARLAND “CRIMINAL CLASS REPRESENTATIVES” ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, U.S. LEGISLATORS, “GOVERNORS, MAYORS, ETC. EMPLOYEES OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT,” MAJOR CORPORATIONS, AND FOREIGN OFFICIALS FOR THEIR ACTS OR OMISSIONS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT”] ADOPTION OF DONALD TRUMP, ET AL SCHEME TO DEFRAUD BOTH SHARON AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER OUT OF MONEY AND/OR PROPERTY WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW), USED THREAT, COERCION, DECEPTION TO TRICK ONE OR BOTH WITNESSES TO TAKE THE COV-19 INJECTION(IN VIOLATION OF THE NUREMBERG CODE)ISSUED EXECUTIVE ORDER 14067 TO DO AWAY ALL CASH(STEAL ALL OUR CASH IN THE BANK AND FORCE US TO BUY ONLY WHAT THEY APPROVE – “ENSLAVEMENT”
TWO WITNESSES(ALL. U.S. CITIZENS AND/OR HUMANITY)”ALL” OUR HARD EARN MONEY IN THE BANK[ALL RETIREMENT FUNDS, 401K’S, MUTUAL FUNDS “EVERYTHING”] FORCE THE TWO WITNESSES(ALL U.S. CITIZENS AND HUMANITY) US TO COMPLY WITH WHATEVER THEY WANT, & PROPERTY AND ENSLAVE US BY USING A DIGITAL DOLLAR-“CUT ON OR OFF”
AT WILL BY THE U.S. GOVERNMENT!!
FOR ILLEGAL, UNLAWFUL SCHEME TO “STEAL” THE
video here – central bank digital currencies: freedom dies!
BIDEN GRANTS(ATTEMPTS)TO U.S. SOVERIGNTY TO CHINA A COUNTRY(“THAT DO NOT NOT BELIEVE IN HUMAN RIGHTS”) GOING BANKRUPT SEE BELOW:
FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE BIDEN GIVES OR ATTEMPTS TO GIVE CHINA HANDING OVER U.S. NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY & OVER ULTIMATE CONTROL OF AMERICA’S HEALTH CARE SYSTEM(OBAMACARE) IS Mass surveillance in China,”Predictive Policing,” China social credit system, China Cashless Society which, COLLECT MEN AND WOMEN DNA TO INPUT IN A SUPERCOMPUTER VIA COV-19 TEST KITS SENT TO HOSPITAL AND/OR LABS
https://www.thetrumpet.com/24057-why-is-china-collecting-american-dna
THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS BIDEN SUBMITTED TO THE WHO AS FOLLOWS:
ALSO, BIDEN GIVES CHINA ACCESS TO THE U.S. POWER GRID!!
https://www.aclu.org/other/surveillance-under-usapatriot-act
– CHINA GOT YOUR DNA) parallel with Biden’s March 9, 2022 Digital Forms of Currency
– CHINA GOT ‘the two witnesses ” and/or humanity DNA VIA U.S. SUPREME GRANTS COLLECTION OF “ALL dna WITHOUT PROBALBE CAUSE – SEE BELOW U.S. SUPREME COURT ORDER) parallel with Biden’s March 9, 2022 Digital Forms of Currency
In the United States, there are both federal and state laws prohibiting treason. Treason is defined on the federal level in Article III, Section 3 of the United States Constitution as: “only in levying War against [the United States], or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.” Most state constitutions include similar definitions of treason, specifically limited to levying war against the state, “adhering to the enemies” of the state, or aiding the enemies of the state, and requiring two witnesses or a confession in open court.
COVID “PLANDEMIC” “MODELED AFTER THE WORLD ECONOMIC CRISIS 1929-1939.(CURRENT STOCK MARKET MANPULATION SETTING THE STAGE FOR COLLAPSE OF THE STOCK MARKET/WALL STREET) SIMILAR TO LARGE-SCALE UNEMPLOYMENT, SOCIAL DISLOCATION WHICH CONTRIBUTED TO THE RISE OF NAZISM IN GERMANY AND ADOLF HITLER, AND THE POPULATRITY OF COMMUNISM(PEOPLE WHERE MOR ACCEPTANC – AND NAZI SOCIAL DISTANCING) IT PARALELL WITH “MASS LARGE SCALE UNEMPLOYMENT” SOCIAL DISLOCATION AND THE RISE AND/OR ACCEPTANCE VIA THE COVID “PLANDEMIC” SAME WITH THE THE PANDEMIC CAUSE GREAT DEPRESSION
CONSOLIDATE WITH COMMUNIST CHINA, PREDICTIVE POLICING, DO A “GREAT RESET”
CONCEALED KNOWN FACTS THEY WERE UNDER A DUTY TO DISCLOSED, USED TRICK SCHEME AND COERCION TO “FORCE” ONE OR BOTH WITNESSES TO TAKE AND COV-19 INJECTIONS, BY BIDEN MANDATES IN WHICH ALL ANIMINAL DIED IN STUDIES AND VIOLED THE NUREMBERG CODE REFERRED TO THE TWO WITNESSES(AND HUMAN BEINGS – “HUMANITY”) AS “HACKABLE ANIMALS!!”
The Nuremberg Code (1947)
Permissible Medical Experiments
The great weight of the evidence before us to effect that certain types of medical experiments on human beings, when kept within reasonably well-defined bounds, conform to the ethics of the medical profession generally. The protagonists of the practice of human experimentation justify their views on the basis that such experiments yield results for the good of society that are unprocurable by other methods or means of study. All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
- The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.
The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity. - The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
- The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results justify the performance of the experiment.
- The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
- No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
- The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
- Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability or death.
- The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
- During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
- During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
HUNDREDS AND/OR THOUSANDS HAVE ATTEMPTED TO SPEAK AGAINST THE “COV-19 INJECTION” & PROSECUTE, HAVE FAILED AND DO NOT HAVE THE LEGAL STANDING OR CAPACITY TO PROSECUTE AND JAIL THE PERPETRATORS) MILLIONS AND/OR BILLIONS OF PEOPLE”AROUND THE WORLD” HAVE BEEN “CENSORED” AND UNABLE TO EXPRESS THEIR VIEWS, OPINIONS ABOUT “THE COV-19 INJECTION.” FACEBOOK, TWITTER, YOUTUBE AND MOST IF NOT ALL SOCIAL MEDIA HAVE BEEN “CENSORED” COMPANIES, HAVE BEEN “FLAGGED,” CONTENT INAPPROPRIATE, EVEN THOUGH IT DOES NOT VIOLATE ANY STATED TERMS OF SERVICE, MAKING UNANNOUNCED AND UNEXPLAINTED CHANGES TO COMPANY POLICIES THAT HAVE THE EFFECT OF DISFAVORING CERTAIN VEIWPOINTS; AND DELETING CONTENT AND ENTIRE ACCOUNTS WITH NO WARNING, NO RATIONALE AND/OR O RECOURSE AND TO PARELLEL WITH CHINA’S XI JINPING AND MAJOR CORPORATION GOOGLE CHINA’S CO-CONSPIRATOR AS FOLLOWS
GOOGLE CHINA’S CO-CONSPIRATOR(JACOB ROTCHILD AKA “THE GLOBAL ELITE” AS FOLLOWS CREATED A SEARCH ENGINE FOR CHINESE COMMUNIST PARTY THAT WOULD BLACKLIST SEARCHES FOR
HUMAN RIGHTS,” HID DATA UNFAVORABLE TO CHINESE COMMUNIST PARTY AND TRACKED USERS DETERMINED APPROPRIATE FOR SURVEILLENCE. ALSO ESTABLISHED PARTNERSHIPS IN CHINA THAT PROVIDE DIRECT BENEFITS TO CHINESE MILITARY. OTHER COMPANIES HAVE ACCEPTED ADVERTISEMENTS PAID FOR BY THE CHINESE GOVENMENT THAT SPREAD FALSE INFORMATION ABOUT CHINA’S MASS IMPRISIONMENT OF RELIGIOUS MINORITIES THEREBY ENABLING THESE ABUSES OF HUMAN RIGHTS. THEY HAVE ALSO AMPLIFIED CHINA’S PROPAGANDA ABROAD, INCLUDING BY ALLOWING CHINESE GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS TO USE THEIR PLATFORMS TO SPREAD MISINFORMATION REGARDING THE ORIGINS OF THE COV-19 PANDEMIC, AND TO UNDERMINE PRO-DEMOCRACY PROTEST IN HONG KONG
_______________________________
VIA ADMARILTY AND/OR MARITIME LAW, BURIFICATION OF TRIAL, AND NOTICE OF CONVICTION AND SENTENCE AND ALL se concurrent jurisdiction over admiralty cases in which plaintiffs seek traditional common law remedies)- AND ADJUDICATION OF IN PERSONAM(AND/OR QUI ADMIRALTYPROPERTY IS FORFEITED TO “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR AS FOLLOWS, “TAKING SATAN’S JOB IN HEAVEN(AS CHIEF MUSICIAN, PRAISE AND WORSHIP OF THE HEAVENLY CREATOR)TAKING ALL OF SATAN MONEY, FORFEITED BY PRIDE, WRONG :ELOW)YESHUA/JESUS CHRIST, REPRESENTATIVE OF THE TWELVE TRIBES OF ISRAELAPPEARS BEFORE “THE GOD OF THE EARTH” JACOB ROTHCHILD(SATAN’S REPRESENTATIVE – THE GOD OF THIS EARTH, THE THIRTEENTH BLOOD LINES, SATANIST, FATHER OF LIES, DECEPTION, CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD THE TWO SHARON[DAVIS-ABUSALEM] BRIDGEWATER VIA”THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR(A WOMEN AND VICTIM OF TRUMP, GARLAND, BIDEN, HARRIS, OBAMA “U.S. GOVERNMENT STATE ACTORS” CONTINUAL VIOLENCE AND OPPRESSION, RENDERED DISABLED BY THEIR HEINOUS ACTS OR OMISSION FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING TO JAN. 1, 2009 AND FURTHER CONTINUING THRUINTENTIONAL” CONTINUAL VIOLENCE AND OPPRESSION BY PRESENT)AND THE SHARON[DAVIS-ABUSALEM] BRIDGEWATER VIA”THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR(A )(SEE REVELATION 12 – ALSO SEE AMERICA JUDGED ON THIS WEBSITE– SEPTEMBER 23, 2017) BEFORE, STATUE OF LIMITATIONS TOLLED
SEE BELOW DECLARATORY JUDGMENT, BI-LATERAL CLASS REPRESENTATIVES, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION, ARREST WARRANTS IN REM AND OTHER ADMIRALITY AND/OR MARITIME DOCUMENTS
(ON BEHALF OF MYSELF, MY SON JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER, U.S. CITIZENS, THE SAINTS OF GOD IN HEAVEN AND/OR OF “HUMANITY,” MEN AND WOMEN CREATED IN THE IMAGE OF GOD IN HEAVEN, YESHUA/JESUS CHRIST – GOD, THE 12 TRIBES OF ISRAEL (ON BEHALF OF JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER, U.S. CITIZENS AND/OR HUMANITY) A VICTIM AND FEDERAL WITNESS, INJURED AND DAMAGED IN BUSINESS, PERSON OR PROPERTY & RESTRAINED FROM INTERSTATE AND/OR FOREIGN COMMERCE FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT (ON BEHALF OF HERSELF, HER SON – THE SECOND WITNESS AND VICTIM OF A U.S. GOVERNMENT VICTIM AND FEDERAL WITNESS INJURED AND DAMAGED BY THE COV-19 INJECTION, RESTRAIN VIA “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL( AND/OR RELATOR A QUALIFIED FEDERAL BEING DULY)REPRESENTATIVE OF “HUMANITY,” MEN AND WOMEN CREATED IN THE IMAGE OF GOD IN HEAVEN, YESHUA/JESUS CHRIST – GOD, THE 12 TRIBES OF ISRAEL – JUDGE, JURY, PROSECUTOR, CLERK AND EXECUTOR, PURSUANT TO MY “COMMON LAW RIGHT VIA ADMARILTY AND/OR MARITIME LAW, BURIFICATION OF TRIAL, AND NOTICE OF CONVICTION AND SENTENCE AND ALL se concurrent jurisdiction over admiralty cases in which plaintiffs seek traditional common law remedies)- AND ADJUDICATION OF IN PERSONAM(AND/OR QUI ADMIRALTYPROPERTY IS FORFEITED TO “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR AS FOLLOWS, “TAKING SATAN’S JOB IN HEAVEN(AS CHIEF MUSICIAN, PRAISE AND WORSHIP OF THE HEAVENLY CREATOR)TAKING ALL OF SATAN MONEY, FORFEITED BY PRIDE, WRONG :
COMES NOW SHARON[DAVIS- ABUSALEM]BRIDGEWATER VIA “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PEOPLE OF THE 50 STATES(AND/OR HUMANITY)AND CLERK, JUDGE, JURY, PROSECUTOR, “U.S. MARSHAL”(18 U.S. Code § 3053 – Powers of marshals and deputies” AND/OR 8 U.S. Code § 566) PURUSANT TO AND EXECUTIONER PURSUANT TO LEGAL RIGHT VIA THE RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATON ACT(RICO) AND/OR ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME LAW GIVE NOTICE OF FORFEITURE OF ALL TANGIBLE AND INTANGIBLE PROPERTY(INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ALL “SECRET” CONCENTRATION CAMPS, “BOX RAILROAD-TRACK TRAIN CARS FOR THE TRANSPORTATION OF “THE FINAL HOLOCAUST VICTIMS,” GUILLOTINES, FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT(FEMA) CASKETS “MILLIONS” – SEE
, BURIFICATION OF TRIAL, AND NOTICE OF CONVICTION AND SENTENCE AND ALL se concurrent jurisdiction over admiralty cases in which plaintiffs seek traditional common law remedies)- AND ADJUDICATION OF IN PERSONAM(AND/OR QUI ADMIRALTYPROPERTY IS FORFEITED TO “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR AS FOLLOWS, “TAKING SATAN’S JOB IN HEAVEN(AS CHIEF MUSICIAN, PRAISE AND WORSHIP OF THE HEAVENLY CREATOR)TAKING ALL OF SATAN MONEY, FORFEITED BY PRIDE, WRONG :
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT FOR THE PEOPLE OF THE “50 STATES” AND/OR “HUMANITY” VIA THE RACKETEERED ININGJ “U.S. MARSHAL”(18 U.S. Code § 3053 – Powers of marshals and deputies” AND/OR 8 U.S. Code § 566) PURUSANT TO AND EXECUTIONER PURSUANT TO LEGAL RIGHT VIA THE RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATON ACT(RICO) AND/OR ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME LAWMY “COMMON LAW RIGHT VIA ADMARILTY AND/OR MARITIME LAW
PROSECUTOR, JUDGE, JURY(ONE OR MORE CLERK, U.S. MARSHAL)
NEW PAGE
§2332d. Financial transactions
(a) Offense.—Except as provided in regulations issued by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State, whoever, being a United States person, knowing or having reasonable cause to know that a country is designated under section 6(j) 1 of the Export Administration Act of 1979 (50 U.S.C. App. 2405) as a country supporting international terrorism, engages in a financial transaction with the government of that country, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned for not more than 10 years, or both.
(b) Definitions.—As used in this section—
(1) the term “financial transaction” has the same meaning as in section 1956(c)(4); and
(2) the term “United States person” means any—
(A) United States citizen or national;
(C) juridical person organized under the laws of the United States; or
(D) any person in the United States.
§2332f. Bombings of places of public use, government facilities, public transportation systems and infrastructure facilities
(1) In general.—Whoever unlawfully delivers, places, discharges, or detonates an explosive or other lethal device in, into, or against a place of public use, a state or government facility, a public transportation system, or an infrastructure facility—
(A) with the intent to cause death or serious bodily injury, or
(B) with the intent to cause extensive destruction of such a place, facility, or system, where such destruction results in or is likely to result in major economic loss,
shall be punished as prescribed in subsection (c).
(2) Attempts and conspiracies.—Whoever attempts or conspires to commit an offense under paragraph (1) shall be punished as prescribed in subsection (c).
(b) Jurisdiction.—There is jurisdiction over the offenses in subsection (a) if—
(1) the offense takes place in the United States and—
(A) the offense is committed against another state or a government facility of such state, including its embassy or other diplomatic or consular premises of that state;
(B) the offense is committed in an attempt to compel another state or the United States to do or abstain from doing any act;
(C) at the time the offense is committed, it is committed—
(i) on board a vessel flying the flag of another state;
(ii) on board an aircraft which is registered under the laws of another state; or
(iii) on board an aircraft which is operated by the government of another state;
(D) a perpetrator is found outside the United States;
(E) a perpetrator is a national of another state or a stateless person; or
(F) a victim is a national of another state or a stateless person;
(2) the offense takes place outside the United States and—
(A) a perpetrator is a national of the United States or is a stateless person whose habitual residence is in the United States;
(B) a victim is a national of the United States;
(C) a perpetrator is found in the United States;
(D) the offense is committed in an attempt to compel the United States to do or abstain from doing any act;
(E) the offense is committed against a state or government facility of the United States, including an embassy or other diplomatic or consular premises of the United States;
(F) the offense is committed on board a vessel flying the flag of the United States or an aircraft which is registered under the laws of the United States at the time the offense is committed; or
(G) the offense is committed on board an aircraft which is operated by the United States.
(c) Penalties.—Whoever violates this section shall be punished as provided under section 2332a(a) of this title.
(d) Exemptions to Jurisdiction.—This section does not apply to—
(1) the activities of armed forces during an armed conflict, as those terms are understood under the law of war, which are governed by that law,
(2) activities undertaken by military forces of a state in the exercise of their official duties; or
(3) offenses committed within the United States, where the alleged offender and the victims are United States citizens and the alleged offender is found in the United States, or where jurisdiction is predicated solely on the nationality of the victims or the alleged offender and the offense has no substantial effect on interstate or foreign commerce.
(e) Definitions.—As used in this section, the term—
(1) “serious bodily injury” has the meaning given that term in section 1365(g)(3) of this title; 1
(2) “national of the United States” has the meaning given that term in section 101(a)(22) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(22));
(3) “state or government facility” includes any permanent or temporary facility or conveyance that is used or occupied by representatives of a state, members of Government, the legislature or the judiciary or by officials or employees of a state or any other public authority or entity or by employees or officials of an intergovernmental organization in connection with their official duties;
(4) “intergovernmental organization” includes international organization (as defined in section 1116(b)(5) of this title);
(5) “infrastructure facility” means any publicly or privately owned facility providing or distributing services for the benefit of the public, such as water, sewage, energy, fuel, or communications;
(6) “place of public use” means those parts of any building, land, street, waterway, or other location that are accessible or open to members of the public, whether continuously, periodically, or occasionally, and encompasses any commercial, business, cultural, historical, educational, religious, governmental, entertainment, recreational, or similar place that is so accessible or open to the public;
(7) “public transportation system” means all facilities, conveyances, and instrumentalities, whether publicly or privately owned, that are used in or for publicly available services for the transportation of persons or cargo;
(8) “explosive” has the meaning given in section 844(j) of this title insofar that it is designed, or has the capability, to cause death, serious bodily injury, or substantial material damage;
(9) “other lethal device” means any weapon or device that is designed or has the capability to cause death, serious bodily injury, or substantial damage to property through the release, dissemination, or impact of toxic chemicals, biological agents, or toxins (as those terms are defined in section 178 of this title) or radiation or radioactive material;
(10) “military forces of a state” means the armed forces of a state which are organized, trained, and equipped under its internal law for the primary purpose of national defense or security, and persons acting in support of those armed forces who are under their formal command, control, and responsibility;
(11) “armed conflict” does not include internal disturbances and tensions, such as riots, isolated and sporadic acts of violence, and other acts of a similar nature; and
(12) “state” has the same meaning as that term has under international law, and includes all political subdivisions thereof.
(Added Pub. L. 107–197, title I, §102(a), June 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 721.)
Editorial Notes
References in Text
Section 1365(g)(3), referred to in subsec. (e)(1), was redesignated section 1365(h)(3) by Pub. L. 107–307, §2(1), Dec. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 2445.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date
Pub. L. 107–197, title I, §103, June 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 724, provided that: “Section 102 [enacting this section and provisions set out as a note below] shall take effect on the date that the International Convention for the Suppression of Terrorist Bombings enters into force for the United States [July 26, 2002].”
Disclaimer
Pub. L. 107–197, title I, §102(c), June 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 724, provided that: “Nothing contained in this section [enacting this section and provisions set out as a note above] is intended to affect the applicability of any other Federal or State law which might pertain to the underlying conduct.”
1 See References in Text note below.
§2332g. Missile systems designed to destroy aircraft
(1) In general.—Except as provided in paragraph (3), it shall be unlawful for any person to knowingly produce, construct, otherwise acquire, transfer directly or indirectly, receive, possess, import, export, or use, or possess and threaten to use—
(A) an explosive or incendiary rocket or missile that is guided by any system designed to enable the rocket or missile to—
(i) seek or proceed toward energy radiated or reflected from an aircraft or toward an image locating an aircraft; or
(ii) otherwise direct or guide the rocket or missile to an aircraft;
(B) any device designed or intended to launch or guide a rocket or missile described in subparagraph (A); or
(C) any part or combination of parts designed or redesigned for use in assembling or fabricating a rocket, missile, or device described in subparagraph (A) or (B).
(2) Nonweapon.—Paragraph (1)(A) does not apply to any device that is neither designed nor redesigned for use as a weapon.
(3) Excluded conduct.—This subsection does not apply with respect to—
(A) conduct by or under the authority of the United States or any department or agency thereof or of a State or any department or agency thereof; or
(B) conduct pursuant to the terms of a contract with the United States or any department or agency thereof or with a State or any department or agency thereof.
(b) Jurisdiction.—Conduct prohibited by subsection (a) is within the jurisdiction of the United States if—
(1) the offense occurs in or affects interstate or foreign commerce;
(2) the offense occurs outside of the United States and is committed by a national of the United States;
(3) the offense is committed against a national of the United States while the national is outside the United States;
(4) the offense is committed against any property that is owned, leased, or used by the United States or by any department or agency of the United States, whether the property is within or outside the United States; or
(5) an offender aids or abets any person over whom jurisdiction exists under this subsection in committing an offense under this section or conspires with any person over whom jurisdiction exists under this subsection to commit an offense under this section.
(1) In general.—Any person who violates, or attempts or conspires to violate, subsection (a) shall be fined not more than $2,000,000 and shall be sentenced to a term of imprisonment not less than 25 years or to imprisonment for life.
(2) Other circumstances.—Any person who, in the course of a violation of subsection (a), uses, attempts or conspires to use, or possesses and threatens to use, any item or items described in subsection (a), shall be fined not more than $2,000,000 and imprisoned for not less than 30 years or imprisoned for life.
(3) Special circumstances.—If the death of another results from a person’s violation of subsection (a), the person shall be fined not more than $2,000,000 and punished by imprisonment for life.
(d) Definition.—As used in this section, the term “aircraft” has the definition set forth in section 40102(a)(6) of title 49, United States Code.
(Added Pub. L. 108–458, title VI, §6903, Dec. 17, 2004, 118 Stat. 3770.)
§2332h. Radiological dispersal devices
(1) In general.—Except as provided in paragraph (2), it shall be unlawful for any person to knowingly produce, construct, otherwise acquire, transfer directly or indirectly, receive, possess, import, export, or use, or possess and threaten to use—
(A) any weapon that is designed or intended to release radiation or radioactivity at a level dangerous to human life; or
(B) any device or other object that is capable of and designed or intended to endanger human life through the release of radiation or radioactivity.
(2) Exception.—This subsection does not apply with respect to—
(A) conduct by or under the authority of the United States or any department or agency thereof; or
(B) conduct pursuant to the terms of a contract with the United States or any department or agency thereof.
(b) Jurisdiction.—Conduct prohibited by subsection (a) is within the jurisdiction of the United States if—
(1) the offense occurs in or affects interstate or foreign commerce;
(2) the offense occurs outside of the United States and is committed by a national of the United States;
(3) the offense is committed against a national of the United States while the national is outside the United States;
(4) the offense is committed against any property that is owned, leased, or used by the United States or by any department or agency of the United States, whether the property is within or outside the United States; or
(5) an offender aids or abets any person over whom jurisdiction exists under this subsection in committing an offense under this section or conspires with any person over whom jurisdiction exists under this subsection to commit an offense under this section.
(1) In general.—Any person who violates, or attempts or conspires to violate, subsection (a) shall be fined not more than $2,000,000 and shall be sentenced to a term of imprisonment not less than 25 years or to imprisonment for life.
(2) Other circumstances.—Any person who, in the course of a violation of subsection (a), uses, attempts or conspires to use, or possesses and threatens to use, any item or items described in subsection (a), shall be fined not more than $2,000,000 and imprisoned for not less than 30 years or imprisoned for life.
(3) Special circumstances.—If the death of another results from a person’s violation of subsection (a), the person shall be fined not more than $2,000,000 and punished by imprisonment for life.
(Added Pub. L. 108–458, title VI, §6905, Dec. 17, 2004, 118 Stat. 3772.)
§2339. Harboring or concealing terrorists
(a) Whoever harbors or conceals any person who he knows, or has reasonable grounds to believe, has committed, or is about to commit, an offense under section 32 (relating to destruction of aircraft or aircraft facilities), section 175 (relating to biological weapons), section 229 (relating to chemical weapons), section 831 (relating to nuclear materials), paragraph (2) or (3) of section 844(f) (relating to arson and bombing of government property risking or causing injury or death), section 1366(a) (relating to the destruction of an energy facility), section 2280 (relating to violence against maritime navigation), section 2332a (relating to weapons of mass destruction), or section 2332b (relating to acts of terrorism transcending national boundaries) of this title, section 236(a) (relating to sabotage of nuclear facilities or fuel) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2284(a)), or section 46502 (relating to aircraft piracy) of title 49, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
(b) A violation of this section may be prosecuted in any Federal judicial district in which the underlying offense was committed, or in any other Federal judicial district as provided by law.
(Added Pub. L. 107–56, title VIII, §803(a), Oct. 26, 2001, 115 Stat. 376; amended Pub. L. 107–273, div. B, title IV, §4005(d)(2), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1813.)
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2002—Pub. L. 107–273 made technical correction to directory language of Pub. L. 107–56, §803(a), which enacted this section.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2002 Amendment
Pub. L. 107–273, div. B, title IV, §4005(d)(2), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1813, provided that the amendment made by section 4005(d)(2) is effective Oct. 26, 2001.
§2339A. Providing material support to terrorists
(a) Offense.—Whoever provides material support or resources or conceals or disguises the nature, location, source, or ownership of material support or resources, knowing or intending that they are to be used in preparation for, or in carrying out, a violation of section 32, 37, 81, 175, 229, 351, 831, 842(m) or (n), 844(f) or (i), 930(c), 956, 1091, 1114, 1116, 1203, 1361, 1362, 1363, 1366, 1751, 1992, 2155, 2156, 2280, 2281, 2332, 2332a, 2332b, 2332f, 2340A, or 2442 of this title, section 236 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2284), section 46502 or 60123(b) of title 49, or any offense listed in section 2332b(g)(5)(B) (except for sections 2339A and 2339B) or in preparation for, or in carrying out, the concealment of an escape from the commission of any such violation, or attempts or conspires to do such an act, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 15 years, or both, and, if the death of any person results, shall be imprisoned for any term of years or for life. A violation of this section may be prosecuted in any Federal judicial district in which the underlying offense was committed, or in any other Federal judicial district as provided by law.
(b) Definitions.—As used in this section—
(1) the term “material support or resources” means any property, tangible or intangible, or service, including currency or monetary instruments or financial securities, financial services, lodging, training, expert advice or assistance, safehouses, false documentation or identification, communications equipment, facilities, weapons, lethal substances, explosives, personnel (1 or more individuals who may be or include oneself), and transportation, except medicine or religious materials;
(2) the term “training” means instruction or teaching designed to impart a specific skill, as opposed to general knowledge; and
(3) the term “expert advice or assistance” means advice or assistance derived from scientific, technical or other specialized knowledge.
§2339B. Providing material support or resources to designated foreign terrorist organizations
(1) Unlawful conduct.—Whoever knowingly provides material support or resources to a foreign terrorist organization, or attempts or conspires to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both, and, if the death of any person results, shall be imprisoned for any term of years or for life. To violate this paragraph, a person must have knowledge that the organization is a designated terrorist organization (as defined in subsection (g)(6)), that the organization has engaged or engages in terrorist activity (as defined in section 212(a)(3)(B) of the Immigration and Nationality Act), or that the organization has engaged or engages in terrorism (as defined in section 140(d)(2) of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1988 and 1989).
(2) Financial institutions.—Except as authorized by the Secretary, any financial institution that becomes aware that it has possession of, or control over, any funds in which a foreign terrorist organization, or its agent, has an interest, shall—
(A) retain possession of, or maintain control over, such funds; and
(B) report to the Secretary the existence of such funds in accordance with regulations issued by the Secretary.
(b) Civil Penalty.—Any financial institution that knowingly fails to comply with subsection (a)(2) shall be subject to a civil penalty in an amount that is the greater of—
(B) twice the amount of which the financial institution was required under subsection (a)(2) to retain possession or control.
(c) Injunction.—Whenever it appears to the Secretary or the Attorney General that any person is engaged in, or is about to engage in, any act that constitutes, or would constitute, a violation of this section, the Attorney General may initiate civil action in a district court of the United States to enjoin such violation.
(d) Extraterritorial Jurisdiction.—
(1) In general.—There is jurisdiction over an offense under subsection (a) if—
(A) an offender is a national of the United States (as defined in section 101(a)(22) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(22))) or an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States (as defined in section 101(a)(20) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(20)));
(B) an offender is a stateless person whose habitual residence is in the United States;
(C) after the conduct required for the offense occurs an offender is brought into or found in the United States, even if the conduct required for the offense occurs outside the United States;
(D) the offense occurs in whole or in part within the United States;
(E) the offense occurs in or affects interstate or foreign commerce; or
(F) an offender aids or abets any person over whom jurisdiction exists under this paragraph in committing an offense under subsection (a) or conspires with any person over whom jurisdiction exists under this paragraph to commit an offense under subsection (a).
(2) Extraterritorial jurisdiction.—There is extraterritorial Federal jurisdiction over an offense under this section.
§2339D. Receiving military-type training from a foreign terrorist organization
(a) Offense.—Whoever knowingly receives military-type training from or on behalf of any organization designated at the time of the training by the Secretary of State under section 219(a)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act as a foreign terrorist organization shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for ten years, or both. To violate this subsection, a person must have knowledge that the organization is a designated terrorist organization (as defined in subsection (c)(4)), that the organization has engaged or engages in terrorist activity (as defined in section 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act), or that the organization has engaged or engages in terrorism (as defined in section 140(d)(2) of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1988 and 1989).
(b) Extraterritorial Jurisdiction.—There is extraterritorial Federal jurisdiction over an offense under this section. There is jurisdiction over an offense under subsection (a) if—
(1) an offender is a national of the United States (as defined in 1 101(a)(22) of the Immigration and Nationality Act) or an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States (as defined in section 101(a)(20) of the Immigration and Nationality Act);
(2) an offender is a stateless person whose habitual residence is in the United States;
(3) after the conduct required for the offense occurs an offender is brought into or found in the United States, even if the conduct required for the offense occurs outside the United States;
(4) the offense occurs in whole or in part within the United States;
(5) the offense occurs in or affects interstate or foreign commerce; or
(6) an offender aids or abets any person over whom jurisdiction exists under this paragraph in committing an offense under subsection (a) or conspires with any person over whom jurisdiction exists under this paragraph to commit an offense under subsection (a).
Plaintiffs allege that defendants’ activities described herein above constituted an artifice and scheme to defraud Class Plantiffs and/or Petitioners, and/or the United States and/or Class Plaintiffs subject the Plaintiffs to peonage and/or slavery, defraud, the plaintiffs out of money or property,and/or to publish, transmit, and/or otherwise circulate misleading, false information about Sharon Bridgewater(Speciatly Investment Group LLC)to maliciously, defame, libel, and hurt the Plaintiffs representation, name and/or minority businesses, and/or false and misleading information including of but not restricted to that there actions were :
Approved by the US President
Approved by the Department of Justice
Approved by Supreme Court of the United States
Approved by Appealant Court Judges
Approved by US Legislators and US Congressman
Approved by Secretary of State
Approved by the
Approved by the Alameda County Housing Authority
Approved by the San Francisco Superior Court
Approved by the United States Federal District Court of Georgia
Approved by the United States Federal District Court of California’
Approved by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development
Approved by Gwinnett County
Approved by County of Dekalb County
Approved by the State of Califoria
Approved by the United States Federal Government Department of Justice
Approved by the United States Federal District Court of Michigan
Approved by the United States President
The Defendants actions drove the Plaintiffs out of business and prevented the complaintant from conducting business, and the plaintiffs lost profits and the defendants actions constitute a course of conduct and a pattern of practice intended, designed, implemented, and executed to destroy the Plaintiffs and/or other victims(African Americans and Hispanics) and constitutes contravention of both Title 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341 and 1343 and/or a violation of (1) and/or (2) and/or (3) and/or (4) and/or (5) and/or (6) and/or (7) and/or (8) and/or (9) and/or (10) and/or(11)and/or (12) and/or (13) and/or(14) and/or (15) and/or (14) and/or (15) and/or (16) and/or (17) and/or (18) and/or (19) and/or (20) and/or (21) and/or (22) and/or (23) and/or (24) and/or (25) and/or (26) and/or (27) and/or (28) and/or (29) and/or (30) and/or (31) and/or (32) as mentioned in the above pages 42 thru 46 of the above criminal charges.
fo
8.3 ASSAULT ON FEDERAL OFFICER OR EMPLOYEE
(18 U.S.C. § 111(a))
The defendant is charged in [Count _______ of] the indictment with assault on a federal officer in violation of Section 111(a) of Title 18 of the United States Code. In order for the defendant to be found guilty of that charge, the government must prove each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, the defendant forcibly assaulted [name of federal officer or employee]; [and]
Second, the defendant did so while [name of federal officer or employee] was engaged in, or on account of [his] [her] official duties[.] [; and]
[Third, the defendant [made physical contact] [acted with the intent to commit another felony].]
There is a forcible assault when one person intentionally strikes another, or willfully attempts to inflict injury on another, or intentionally threatens another coupled with an apparent ability to inflict injury on another which causes a reasonable apprehension of immediate bodily harm.
Comment
When the crime is charged under the enhanced penalty provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 111(b), use Instruction 8.4 (Assault on Federal Officer [With a Deadly or Dangerous Weapon] [Which Inflicts Bodily Injury]).
See 18 U.S.C. § 1114 for the definition of federal officer or employee referenced in 18 U.S.C. § 111.
The third element is to be used only when the charge is a felony. A felony charge requires actual physical contact or action with the intent to commit another felony.
A reasonable apprehension of immediate bodily harm is determined with reference to a reasonable person aware of the circumstances known to the victim, not with reference to all circumstances, including circumstances unknown to the victim. United States v. Acosta-Sierra, 690 F.3d 1111, 1121 (9th Cir. 2012).
The statutory language states that the crime can be committed by one who “forcibly assaults, resists, opposes, impedes, intimidates or interferes,” but the Ninth Circuit has held that regardless of the circumstances, the conduct is not criminal unless it includes an assault. United States v. Chapman, 528 F.3d 1215, 1221 (9th Cir.2008). Similarly, the court has held that a proper instruction may not reduce the concept of force or threatened force to the mere appearance of physical intimidation. United States v. Harrison, 585 F.3d 1155, 1160 (9th Cir.2009).
There is no requirement that an assailant be aware that the victim is a federal officer.
United States v. Feola, 420 U.S. 671, 684 (1975). If the defendant denies knowledge that the person assaulted was a federal officer and claims to have acted in self-defense, Instruction 8.5 (Assault on Federal Officer or Employee—Defenses) should be used.
Violation of § 111 is a general intent crime in this circuit. United States v. Jim, 865 F.2d 211, 215 (9th Cir.1989). Among other things, this means that voluntary intoxication is not a defense. Id.
Approved 12/2012
8.4 ASSAULT ON FEDERAL OFFICER OR EMPLOYEE
[WITH A DEADLY OR DANGEROUS WEAPON]
[WHICH INFLICTS BODILY INJURY]
(18 U.S.C. § 111(b))
The defendant is charged in [Count _______ of] the indictment with assault on a federal officer in violation of Section 111(b) of Title 18 of the United States Code. In order for the defendant to be found guilty of that charge, the government must prove each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, the defendant forcibly assaulted [name of federal officer or employee];
Second, the defendant did so while [name of federal officer or employee] was engaged in, or on account of [his] [her] official duties; and
Third, the defendant [used a deadly or dangerous weapon] [inflicted bodily injury].
There is a forcible assault when one person intentionally strikes another, or willfully attempts to inflict injury on another, or intentionally threatens another coupled with an apparent ability to inflict injury on another which causes a reasonable apprehension of immediate bodily harm.
[A [specify weapon] is a deadly or dangerous weapon if it is used in a way that is capable of causing death or serious bodily injury.]
Comment
See 18 U.S.C. § 1114 for the definition of federal officer or employee referenced in 18 U.S.C. § 111.
The statutory language states that the crime can be committed by one who “forcibly assaults, resists, opposes, impedes, intimidates or interferes,” but the Ninth Circuit has held that regardless of the circumstances, the conduct is not criminal unless it includes an assault. United States v. Chapman, 528 F.3d 1215, 1221 (9th Cir.2008).
There is no requirement that an assailant be aware that the victim is a federal officer. United States v. Feola, 420 U.S. 671, 684 (1975). If the defendant denies knowledge that the person assaulted was a federal officer and claims to have acted in self-defense, Instruction 8.5 (Assault on Federal Officer or Employee—Defenses) should be used.
A reasonable apprehension of immediate bodily harm is determined with reference to a reasonable person aware of the circumstances known to the victim, not with reference to all circumstances, including circumstances unknown to the victim. United States v. Acosta-Sierra, 690 F.3d 1111, 1121 (9th Cir. 2012).
Violation of § 111 is a general intent crime in this circuit. United States v. Jim, 865 F.2d 211, 215 (9th Cir.1989). Among other things, this means that voluntary intoxication is not a defense, id., and that § 111(b) does not require an intent to cause the bodily injury. United States
v. Garcia-Camacho, 122 F.3d 1265, 1269 (9th Cir.1997).
Approved 12/2012
8.5 ASSAULT ON FEDERAL OFFICER OR EMPLOYEE—DEFENSES
The defendant asserts that [he] [she] acted in self-defense. It is a defense to the charge if
(1) the defendant did not know that [name of federal officer or employee] was a federal [officer] [employee], (2) the defendant reasonably believed that use of force was necessary to defend oneself against an immediate use of unlawful force, and (3) the defendant used no more force than appeared reasonably necessary in the circumstances.
Force which is likely to cause death or great bodily harm is justified in self-defense only if a person reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent death or great bodily harm.
In addition to proving all the elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt, the government must also prove beyond a reasonable doubt either (1) that the defendant knew that [name of federal officer or employee] was a federal [officer] [employee] or (2) that the defendant did not reasonably believe force was necessary to defend against an immediate use of unlawful force or (3) that the defendant used more force than appeared reasonably necessary in the circumstances.
Comment
In United States v. Feola, 420 U.S. 671, 684 (1975), the Supreme Court held that there is no “requirement that an assailant be aware that his victim is a federal officer” but went on to point out that there could be circumstances where ignorance of the official status of the person assaulted might justify a defendant acting in self-defense. “The jury charge in such a case, therefore, should include (1) an explanation of the essential elements of a claim of self-defense, and (2) an instruction informing the jury that the defendant cannot be convicted unless the government proves, beyond a reasonable doubt, either (a) that the defendant knew that the victim was a federal agent, or (b) that the defendant’s use of deadly force would not have qualified as self-defense even if the agent had, in fact, been a private citizen.” United States v. Alvarez, 755 F.2d 830, 847 (11th Cir.1985) (emphasis in original).
In United States v. Span, 970 F.2d 573 (9th Cir.1992), the Ninth Circuit upheld this instruction. The court cautioned, however, that “the model instruction would be inappropriate in a case where a defendant’s theory of the case is self-defense against the use of excessive force by a federal law enforcement officer.” Id. at 577 (emphasis in original). In such a case, the instruction must be modified appropriately.
8.6 ASSAULT WITH INTENT TO
COMMIT MURDER OR
OTHER FELONY
(18 U.S.C. §§ 113(a)(1) and (2))
The defendant is charged in [Count _______ of] the indictment with assault with intent to commit [specify felony] in violation of Section 113(a)[(1)][(2)] of Title 18 of the United States Code. In order for the defendant to be found guilty of that charge, the government must prove each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, the defendant assaulted [name of victim] by intentionally [[striking] [wounding]] [[him] [her]] [using a display of force that reasonably caused [him] [her] to fear immediate bodily harm];
Second, the defendant did so with the intent to commit [specify felony]; and
Third, the assault took place on [specify place of federal jurisdiction].
Comment
Assaults proscribed by 18 U.S.C. § 113 are those committed “within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States.” See 18 U.S.C. § 7 for the definition of “special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States.”
When the assault consists of a display of force, it must actually cause reasonable apprehension of immediate bodily harm; fear is a necessary element. United States v. Skeet, 665 F.2d 983, 986 n.1 (9th Cir.1982).
8.7 ASSAULT WITH DANGEROUS WEAPON
(18 U.S.C. § 113(a)(3))
The defendant is charged in [Count _______ of] the indictment with assault with a dangerous weapon in violation of Section 113(a)(3) of Title 18 of the United States Code. In order for the defendant to be found guilty of that charge, the government must prove each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, the defendant assaulted [name of victim] by intentionally [[striking] [wounding]] [[him] [her]] [using a display of force that reasonably caused [him] [her] to fear immediate bodily harm];
Second, the defendant acted with the intent to do bodily harm to [name of victim];
Third, the defendant used a dangerous weapon; and
Fourth, the assault took place on [specify place of federal jurisdiction].
[A [specify weapon] is a dangerous weapon if it is used in a way that is capable of causing death or serious bodily injury.]
Comment
See Comment to Instruction 8.4 (Assault on Federal Officer or Employee [With a Deadly or Dangerous Weapon] [Which Inflicts Bodily Injury]).
See United States v. Smith, 561 F.3d 934, 938-40 (9th Cir.2009) (en banc) (discussing prior version of jury instruction).
The use of bare hands only to perpetrate an assault did not constitute use of a “dangerous weapon” and therefore could not support a conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 113(a)(3). United States v. Rocha, 598 F.3d 1144, 1153-58 (9th Cir.2010).
The statutory definition of assault with a dangerous weapon, 18 U.S.C. § 113(a)(3), includes “without just cause or excuse.” However, the existence of “just cause or excuse” is an affirmative defense, and the government does not have the burden of pleading or proving its absence. United States v. Guilbert, 692 F.2d 1340, 1343 (11th Cir.1982).
8.8 SIMPLE ASSAULT OF PERSON UNDER AGE 16
(18 U.S.C. § 113(a)(5))
The defendant is charged in [Count _______ of] the indictment with assaulting a person who has not attained the age of 16 years in violation of Section 113(a)(5) of Title 18 of the United States Code. In order for the defendant to be found guilty of that charge, the government must prove each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, the defendant assaulted [name of victim] by intentionally using a display of force that reasonably caused [him] [her] to fear immediate bodily harm;
Second, [name of victim] was under the age of 16 years at the time of the assault; and
Third, the assault took place on [specify place of federal jurisdiction].
Comment
When the assault consists of a display of force, it must actually cause reasonable apprehension of immediate bodily harm; fear is a necessary element. United States v. Skeet, 665 F.2d 983, 986 n.1 (9th Cir.1982).
8.9 ASSAULT RESULTING IN SERIOUS BODILY INJURY
(18 U.S.C. § 113(a)(6))
The defendant is charged in [Count _______ of] the indictment with assault resulting in serious bodily injury in violation of Section 113(a)(6) of Title 18 of the United States Code. In order for the defendant to be found guilty of that charge, the government must prove each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, the defendant assaulted [name of victim] by intentionally [[striking] [wounding]]
[him] [her];
Second, as a result, [name of victim] suffered serious bodily injury; and
Third, the assault took place on [specify place of federal jurisdiction].
“Serious bodily injury” means bodily injury that involves (1) a substantial risk of death; (2) extreme physical pain; (3) protracted and obvious disfigurement; or (4) protracted loss or impairment of the function of a body part, organ, or mental faculty.
Comment
See Comment to Instruction 8.3 (Assault on Federal Officer or Employee) concerning general intent.
The definition of “serious bodily injury” in the last paragraph of the instruction is the statutory definition in 18 U.S.C. §§ 113(b)(2) and 1365(h)(3).
Proof of battery supports conviction of assault. United States v. Lewellyn, 481 F.3d 695, 697 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 552 U.S. 864 (2007).
At common law, criminal battery is shown if the defendant’s conduct is reckless. United States v. Loera, 923 F.2d 725, 728 (9th Cir.1991). A defendant can be convicted of assault resulting in serious bodily injury if a battery is proved.
8.10 ASSAULT OF PERSON UNDER AGE 16
RESULTING IN SUBSTANTIAL BODILY INJURY
(18 U.S.C. § 113(a)(7))
The defendant is charged in [Count _______ of] the indictment with assaulting a person who has not attained the age of 16 years resulting in substantial bodily injury in violation of Section 113(a)(7) of Title 18 of the United States Code. In order for the defendant to be found guilty of that charge, the government must prove each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, the defendant assaulted [name of victim] by intentionally [[striking] [wounding]]
[him] [her];
Second, as a result, [name of victim] suffered substantial bodily injury;
Third, [name of victim] was under the age of 16 years at the time of the assault; and Fourth, the assault took place on [specify place of federal jurisdiction].
“Substantial bodily injury” means a temporary but substantial disfigurement, or a temporary but substantial loss or impairment of the function of any bodily member, organ or mental faculty.
Comment
The definition of “substantial bodily injury” in the last paragraph of the instruction is the definition given in 18 U.S.C. § 113(b)(1).
8.11 BANKRUPTCY FRAUD—SCHEME OR
ARTIFICE TO DEFRAUD
(18 U.S.C. § 157)
The defendant is charged in [Count _______ of] the indictment with bankruptcy fraud in violation of Section 157 of Title 18 of the United States Code. In order for the defendant to be found guilty of that charge, the government must prove each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, the defendant devised or intended to devise a scheme or plan to defraud;
Second, the defendant acted with the intent to defraud;
Third, the defendant’s act was material; that is, it had a natural tendency to influence, or was capable of influencing the acts of an identifiable person, entity, or group; and
Fourth, the defendant [filed a petition] [filed a document in a proceeding] [made a false or fraudulent representation, claim or promise concerning or in relation to a proceeding] under a Title 11 bankruptcy proceeding to carry out or attempt to carry out an essential part of the scheme.
It does not matter whether the document, representation, claim or promise was itself false or deceptive so long as the bankruptcy proceeding was used as a part of the scheme or plan to defraud, nor does it matter whether the scheme or plan was successful or that any money or property was obtained.
Comment
Unlike the historic bankruptcy crimes described in 18 U.S.C. § 152, bankruptcy fraud under § 157 concerns a fraudulent scheme outside the bankruptcy which uses the bankruptcy as a means of executing or concealing the fraud or artifice. United States v. Milwitt, 475 F.3d 1150, 1155-56 (9th Cir.2007) (bankruptcy fraud requires a specific intent to defraud an identifiable victim or class of victims of the identified fraudulent scheme).
This statute is modeled after the mail and wire fraud statutes and therefore requires a specific intent to defraud or deceive. Id. (citing United States v. Bonallo, 858 F.2d 1427, 1433 (9th Cir.1988)).
8.12 BRIBERY OF PUBLIC OFFICIAL
(18 U.S.C. § 201(b)(1))
The defendant is charged in [Count _______ of] the indictment with bribing a public official in violation of Section 201(b)(1) of Title 18 of the United States Code. In order for the defendant to be found guilty of that charge, the government must prove each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, the defendant [gave] [offered] [promised] something of value, [specify the thing of value], to [name of public official]; and
Second, the defendant acted corruptly, that is, with the intent to [influence an official act by the [name of public official]] [influence the [name of public official] to commit or allow a fraud on the United States] [induce the [name of public official] to do or to omit to do an act in violation of [his] [her] lawful duty][.] [; and]
[Third, [name of public official] was a public official.]
Comment
The crime of bribery requires “corrupt intent,” a higher degree of intent than is required under the provision outlawing gratuities to public officials. United States v. Hsieh Hui Mei Chen, 754 F.2d 817, 822 (9th Cir.1985). Under the bribery sections of § 201, the term “corruptly” refers to the “defendant’s intent to be influenced to perform an act in return for financial gain.” United States v. Leyva, 282 F.3d 623, 626 (9th Cir.2002) (citing United States v. Strand, 574 F.2d 993, 995-96 (9th Cir.1978)).
The “thing of value” given, offered, or promised to a public official is an element of the bribery charge. It is recommended that the instruction specifically describe the thing of value just as it is described in the indictment to avoid a variance. United States v. Choy, 309 F.3d 602, 607 (9th Cir.2002). Where the defense asserts that the thing given, offered, or promised had no value, the jury must be asked to determine whether it had value. See also United States v. Renzi,
769 F.3d 731, 744-45 (9th Cir. 2014) (holding that a “recommendation is just that—a recommendation. Neither the pattern jury instruction nor any controlling precedent requires the district court to identify the thing of value, especially where variance from the indictment is not at issue”).
If there is any question in the case about the “official” character of the action sought by the defendant, insert a sentence following “duty” defining “official act:” “An official act is any decision or action on a question that may be brought before any public official in his official capacity.” See 18 U.S.C. § 201(a)(3). “Public official” is defined in 18 U.S.C. § 201(a)(1); § 201(b)(1) also applies to a person selected to be a public official. Actual power to do what defendant wants is not an element. “[A] person may be convicted of bribery even though the action requested is not within the official’s power to perform.” Chen, 754 F.2d at 825.
Omit the bracketed third element of this instruction when the recipient’s status as a public official is not in dispute. Depending on the facts in evidence, it may be appropriate to amend this instruction with language requiring specific jury unanimity (e.g., “with all of you agreeing as to what the defendant intended the public official to do in return for the bribe”). See Instruction 7.9 (Specific Issue Unanimity).
Approved 3/2015
8.13 RECEIVING BRIBE BY PUBLIC OFFICIAL
(18 U.S.C. § 201(b)(2))
The defendant is charged in [Count _______ of] the indictment with [soliciting]
[receiving] [or] [agreeing to receive] a bribe in violation of Section 201(b)(2) of Title 18 of the United States Code. In order for the defendant to be found guilty of that charge, the government must prove each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, the defendant was a public official;
Second, the defendant [solicited] [received] [agreed to receive] something of value,
[specify the thing of value], in return for [being influenced in the performance of an official act] [being influenced to commit or allow a fraud on the United States] [being persuaded to do or not to do an act in violation of defendant’s official duty]; and
Third, the defendant acted corruptly, that is, intending to be influenced [in the performance of an official act] [to commit or allow a fraud on the United States] [to do or to omit to do an act in violation of the defendant’s official duty].
Comment
“Public official” is defined in 18 U.S.C. § 201(a)(1); § 201(b)(2) also applies to a person selected to be a public official. See also Comment to Instruction 8.12 (Bribery of Public Official). The plain language of 18 U.S.C. 201(b)(2)(B) requires only that the public official accept a thing of value in exchange for perpetrating a fraud; therefore the use of an official position is not an element of the offense under § 201(b)(2)(B). United States v. Leyva, 282 F.3d 623, 625-26 (9th Cir.2002).
Under § 201(b)(2)(B), a public official acts “corruptly” when he or she accepts or receives, or agrees to accept or receive a thing of value, in return for being influenced with the specific intent that, in exchange for the thing of value, some act would be influenced. Leyva, 282 F.3d at 626 (9th Cir.2002).
Depending on the facts in evidence, it may be appropriate to amend this instruction with language requiring specific jury unanimity (e.g., “with all of you agreeing as to what the public official intended to do in return for the bribe”). See Instruction 7.9 (Specific Issue Unanimity).
8.14 BRIBERY OF WITNESS
(18 U.S.C. § 201(b)(3))
The defendant is charged in [Count _______ of] the indictment with bribery of a witness in violation of Section 201(b)(3) of Title 18 of the United States Code. In order for the defendant to be found guilty of that charge, the government must prove each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, [name of witness] was to be a witness under oath at a [specify proceeding];
Second, the defendant [gave] [offered] [promised] something of value, [specify the thing of value], to [name of witness]; and
Third, the defendant acted corruptly, that is, with the intent to influence [[the testimony of [name of witness]] [[name of witness] to be absent from the proceeding].
Comment
It is recommended that the instruction specifically describe the thing of value just as it is described in the indictment to avoid a variance. United States v. Choy, 309 F.3d 602, 607 (9th Cir.2002).
Depending on the facts in evidence, it may be appropriate to amend this instruction with language requiring specific jury unanimity (e.g., “with all of you agreeing as to what the defendant intended the witness to do in return for the bribe”). See Instruction 7.9 (Specific Issue Unanimity).
8.15 RECEIVING BRIBE BY WITNESS
(18 U.S.C. § 201(b)(4))
The defendant is charged in [Count _______ of] the indictment with soliciting a bribe in violation of Section 201(b)(4) of Title 18 of the United States Code. In order for the defendant to be found guilty of that charge, the government must prove each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, the defendant was to be a witness under oath at a [specify proceeding];
Second, the defendant [solicited] [received] [agreed to receive] something of value, [specify the thing of value], in return for being [influenced in the defendant’s testimony] [absent from the proceeding]; and
Third, the defendant acted corruptly, that is, in return for [being influenced in [his] [her] testimony] [absenting [himself] [herself] from the proceeding].
Comment
It is recommended that the instruction specifically describe the thing of value just as it is described in the indictment to avoid a variance. United States v. Choy, 309 F.3d 602, 607 (9th Cir.2002).
Depending on the facts in evidence, it may be appropriate to amend this instruction with language requiring specific jury unanimity (e.g., “with all of you agreeing as to what the witness intended to do in return for the bribe”). See Instruction 7.9 (Specific Issue Unanimity).
8.16 ILLEGAL GRATUITY TO PUBLIC OFFICIAL
(18 U.S.C. § 201(c)(1)(A))
The defendant is charged in [Count _______ of] the indictment with [giving] [offering]
[or] [promising] an illegal gratuity in violation of Section 201(c)(1)(A) of Title 18 of the United States Code. In order for the defendant to be found guilty of that charge, the government must prove each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, that the defendant [gave] [offered] [promised] something of value, [specify the thing of value] to a [specify public official]; and
Second, the defendant acted for or because of an official act performed or to be performed by the [specify public official].
Comment
It is recommended that the instruction specifically describe the thing of value just as it is described in the indictment to avoid a variance. United States v. Choy, 309 F.3d 602, 607 (9th Cir.2002).
To establish a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 201(c)(1)(A), the government must prove a link between a thing of value conferred upon a public official and a specific “official act” for or because of which it was given. United States v. Sun-Diamond Growers of California, 526 U.S. 398, 414 (1999). “Official act” is defined in 18 U.S.C. § 201(a)(3).
The distinguishing features of the crimes of “bribery” and “illegal gratuity” are their intent elements. Bribery requires intent “to influence” an official act or “to be influenced” in an official act, while illegal gratuity requires only that the gratuity be given or accepted “for or because of” a specific official act. Bribery requires a specific intent to give or receive something of value in exchange for an official act. An illegal gratuity may constitute a reward for some future act the public official will take (and may already have determined to take) or for an act already taken. Sun-Diamond Growers, 526 U.S.at 404–05. The gratuity offenses are lesser included offenses of the parallel bribery offenses. See United States v. Crutchfield, 547 F.2d 496, 500 (9th Cir.1977); United States v. Brewster, 506 F.2d 62, 71–72 (D.C. Cir.1974).
Depending on the facts in evidence, it may be appropriate to amend this instruction with language requiring specific jury unanimity (e.g., “with all of you agreeing as to what the defendant intended the public official to do in return for the gratuity”). See Instruction 7.9 (Specific Issue Unanimity).
8.17 RECEIVING ILLEGAL GRATUITY BY PUBLIC OFFICIAL
(18 U.S.C. § 201(c)(1)(B))
The defendant is charged in [Count _______ of] the indictment with [soliciting]
[receiving] [agreeing to receive] an illegal gratuity in violation of Section 201(c)(1)(B) of Title 18 of the United States Code. In order for the defendant to be found guilty of that charge, the government must prove each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, the defendant was [specify public official]; and
Second, the defendant [[solicited] [received] [agreed to receive]] something of value, [specify the thing of value], personally for or because of an official act [performed] [to be performed] by the defendant.
Comment
It is recommended that the instruction specifically describe the thing of value just as it is described in the indictment to avoid a variance. United States v. Choy, 309 F.3d 602, 607 (9th Cir.2002).
See Comment to Instruction 8.16 (Illegal Gratuity to Public Official).
Depending on the facts in evidence, it may be appropriate to amend this instruction with language requiring specific jury unanimity (e.g., “with all of you agreeing as to what the public
official intended to do in return for the gratuity”). See Instruction 7.9 (Specific Issue Unanimity).
“Public official” is defined in 18 U.S.C. § 201(a)(1); § 201(c)(1)(B) also applies to a former public official and a person selected to be a public official.
8.18 ILLEGAL GRATUITY TO WITNESS
(18 U.S.C. § 201(c)(2))
The defendant is charged in [Count _______ of] the indictment with [giving] [offering] [promising] an illegal gratuity in violation of Section 201(c)(2) of Title 18 of the United States Code. In order for the defendant to be found guilty of that charge, the government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant [gave] [offered] [promised] something of value, [specify the thing of value], to [name of witness] [for testimony to be given under oath by [him]
[her] in [specify proceeding]] [because of testimony given under oath by [name of witness] at/in [specify proceeding]] [for being absent from [specify proceeding] so that [he] [she] could not testify as a witness].
Comment
It is recommended that the instruction specifically describe the thing of value just as it is described in the indictment to avoid a variance. United States v. Choy, 309 F.3d 602, 607 (9th Cir.2002).
See Comment to Instruction 8.16 (Illegal Gratuity to Public Official).
Section 201(c)(2) does not prohibit the government from paying fees, housing, expenses, and cash rewards to a cooperating witness so long as the payment does not recompense any corruption of the truth of testimony. United States v. Ihnatenko, 482 F.3d 1097, 1100 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 552 U.S. 904 (2007). Section 201(c)(2) also does not prohibit the government from providing immigration benefits or leniency, immunity from prosecution, or leniency to a cooperating witness. See United States v. Feng, 277 F.3d 1151, 1154 (9th Cir.2002) (immigration benefits); United States v. Smith, 196 F.3d 1034, 1038–40 (9th Cir.1999)
(immunity); United States v. Mattarolo, 209 F.3d 1153, 1160 (9th Cir.2000) (leniency).
Depending on the facts in evidence, it may be appropriate to amend this instruction with language requiring specific jury unanimity (e.g., “with all of you agreeing as to what the defendant” intended the witness to do in return for the gratuity”). See Instruction 7.9 (Specific Issue Unanimity).
8.19 RECEIVING ILLEGAL GRATUITY BY WITNESS
(18 U.S.C. § 201(c)(3))
The defendant is charged in [Count _______ of] the indictment with [soliciting] [receiving] [agreeing to receive] an illegal gratuity in violation of Section 201(c)(3) of Title 18 of the United States Code. In order for the defendant to be found guilty of that charge, the government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant [solicited] [received]
[agreed to receive] something of value, [specify the thing of value], [for testimony to be given under oath by the defendant as a witness in [specify proceeding]] [because of testimony given under oath by the defendant as a witness at/in [specify proceeding]] [for being absent from [specify proceeding] so that the defendant could not testify as a witness].
Comment
See Comment to Instructions 8.12 (Bribery of Public Official), 8.16 (Illegal Gratuity to Public Official), and 8.18 (Illegal Gratuity to Witness).
Depending on the facts in evidence, it may be appropriate to amend this instruction with language requiring specific jury unanimity (e.g., “with all of you agreeing as to what the witness intended to do in return for the gratuity”). See Instruction 7.9 (Specific Issue Unanimity).
8.20 CONSPIRACY—ELEMENTS
The defendant is charged in [Count _______ of] the indictment with conspiring to _______ in violation of Section _______ of Title ___ of the United States Code. In order for the defendant to be found guilty of that charge, the government must prove each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, beginning on or about [date], and ending on or about [date], there was an agreement between two or more persons to commit at least one crime as charged in the indictment; [and]
Second, the defendant became a member of the conspiracy knowing of at least one of its objects and intending to help accomplish it[.] [; and]
[Third, one of the members of the conspiracy performed at least one overt act [on or after [date]] for the purpose of carrying out the conspiracy, with all of you agreeing on a particular overt act that you find was committed.]
A conspiracy is a kind of criminal partnership—an agreement of two or more persons to commit one or more crimes. The crime of conspiracy is the agreement to do something unlawful; it does not matter whether the crime agreed upon was committed.
For a conspiracy to have existed, it is not necessary that the conspirators made a formal agreement or that they agreed on every detail of the conspiracy. It is not enough, however, that they simply met, discussed matters of common interest, acted in similar ways, or perhaps helped one another. You must find that there was a plan to commit at least one of the crimes alleged in the indictment as an object of the conspiracy with all of you agreeing as to the particular crime which the conspirators agreed to commit.
One becomes a member of a conspiracy by willfully participating in the unlawful plan with the intent to advance or further some object or purpose of the conspiracy, even though the person does not have full knowledge of all the details of the conspiracy. Furthermore, one who willfully joins an existing conspiracy is as responsible for it as the originators. On the other hand, one who has no knowledge of a conspiracy, but happens to act in a way which furthers some object or purpose of the conspiracy, does not thereby become a conspirator. Similarly, a person does not become a conspirator merely by associating with one or more persons who are conspirators, nor merely by knowing that a conspiracy exists.
[An overt act does not itself have to be unlawful. A lawful act may be an element of a conspiracy if it was done for the purpose of carrying out the conspiracy. The government is not required to prove that the defendant personally did one of the overt acts.]
Comment
When the charged offense is conspiracy to defraud the United States (or any agency thereof) under the “defraud clause” of 18 U.S.C. § 371, use Instruction 8.21 (Conspiracy to Defraud the United States) in place of this general conspiracy instruction.
“To prove a conspiracy under 18 U.S.C. § 371, the government must establish: (1) an agreement to engage in criminal activity, (2) one or more overt acts taken to implement the agreement, and (3) the requisite intent to commit the substantive crime.” United States v. Montgomery, 384 F.3d 1050, 1062 (9th Cir.2004) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). “The agreement need not be explicit; it is sufficient if the conspirators knew or had reason to know of the scope of the conspiracy and that their own benefits depended on the success of the venture.” Id. (citing United States v. Romero, 282 F.3d 683, 687 (9th Cir.2002)).
With respect to the first element in this instruction, if other jury instructions do not set out the elements of the crimes alleged to be objects of the conspiracy, the elements must be included in this or an accompanying instruction. United States v. Alghazouli, 517 F.3d 1179, 1189 (9th Cir.2008). Nevertheless, conspiracy to commit a crime “does not require completion of the intended underlying offense.” United States v. Iribe, 564 F.3d 1155, 1160–61 (9th Cir.2009).
Use the third element in this instruction only if the applicable statute requires proof of an overt act, e.g., 18 U.S.C. § 371 (first clause) or 18 U.S.C. § 1511(a) (conspiracy to obstruct state or local law enforcement), but omit the third element when the applicable statute does not require proof of an overt act. See Whitfield v. United States, 543 U.S. 209, 212–15 (2005) (proof of overt act not necessary for conspiracy to commit money laundering); and United States v. Shabani, 513 U.S. 10, 15-16 (1994) (proof of overt act not necessary for conspiracy to violate drug statutes).
When there is evidence that an overt act occurred outside the applicable limitations period, include the bracketed material within the third element. See United States v. Fuchs, 218 F.3d 957, 961–62 (9th Cir.2000) (plain error not to require jury to find that overt act occurred within the statute of limitations).
See Instruction 7.9 (Specific Issue Unanimity).
The Supreme Court has held that “[a] conspiracy does not automatically terminate simply because the Government, unbeknownst to some of the conspirators, has ‘defeated’ the conspiracy’s ‘object’.” United States v. Jimenez Recio, 537 U.S. 270, 274 (2003).
8.21 CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD THE UNITED STATES
(18 U.S.C. § 371 “Defraud Clause”)
The defendant is charged in [Count _______ of] the indictment with conspiring to defraud the United States by obstructing the lawful functions of [specify government agency] by deceitful or dishonest means in violation of Section 371 of Title 18 of the United States Code. In order for the defendant to be found guilty of that charge, the government must prove each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, beginning on or about [date], and ending on or about [date], there was an agreement between two or more persons to defraud the United States by obstructing the lawful functions of [specify government agency] by deceitful or dishonest means as charged in the indictment;
Second, the defendant became a member of the conspiracy knowing of at least one of its objects and intending to help accomplish it; and
Third, one of the members of the conspiracy performed at least one overt act [on or after [date]] for the purpose of carrying out the conspiracy, with all of you agreeing on a particular overt act that you find was committed.
An agreement to defraud is an agreement to deceive or to cheat.
A conspiracy is a kind of criminal partnership—an agreement of two or more persons to commit one or more crimes. The crime of conspiracy is the agreement to do something unlawful; it does not matter whether the crime agreed upon was committed.
For a conspiracy to have existed, it is not necessary that the conspirators made a formal agreement or that they agreed on every detail of the conspiracy. It is not enough, however, that they simply met, discussed matters of common interest, acted in similar ways, or perhaps helped one another. You must find that there was a plan to commit at least one of the crimes alleged in the indictment as an object of the conspiracy with all of you agreeing as to the particular crime which the conspirators agreed to commit.
One becomes a member of a conspiracy by willfully participating in the unlawful plan with the intent to advance or further some object or purpose of the conspiracy, even though the person does not have full knowledge of all the details of the conspiracy. Furthermore, one who willfully joins an existing conspiracy is as responsible for it as the originators. On the other hand, one who has no knowledge of a conspiracy, but happens to act in a way which furthers some object or purpose of the conspiracy, does not thereby become a conspirator. Similarly, a person does not become a conspirator merely by associating with one or more persons who are conspirators, nor merely by knowing that a conspiracy exists.
An overt act does not itself have to be unlawful. A lawful act may be an element of a conspiracy if it was done for the purpose of carrying out the conspiracy. The government is not required to prove that the defendant personally did one of the overt acts.
Comment
Use this instruction when the charged offense is conspiracy to defraud the United States under the “defraud clause” of 18 U.S.C. § 371; otherwise use Instruction 8.20 (Conspiracy— Elements).
In United States v. Caldwell, 989 F.2d 1056 (9th Cir.1993), the Ninth Circuit held that defrauding the government under 18 U.S.C. § 371 “means obstructing the operation of any government agency by any ‘deceit, craft or trickery, or at least by means that are dishonest.”’ Id.
at 1058-59. Thus, an instruction that permitted conviction if a defendant merely agreed to defraud the United States by obstructing the Internal Revenue Service in ascertaining and collecting taxes, but did not require proof of deceit or dishonesty, was insufficient and required reversal. To “convict someone under the ‘defraud clause’ of 18 U.S.C. § 371, the government need only show (1) he entered into an agreement (2) to obstruct a lawful function of the government (3) by deceitful or dishonest means and (4) at least one overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy.” Id.; accord United States v. Rodman, 776 F.3d 638, 642 (9th Cir.2015). Moreover, the conspiracy “need not aim to deprive the government of property,” and neither “the conspiracy’s goal nor the means used to achieve it” need to be illegal. Caldwell, 989 F.2d at 1058-59.
If the evidence supports an argument the defendant did not act with the requisite intent to defraud because of a good faith misunderstanding about the requirements of law, consider modifying the fifth paragraph of the instruction as follows:
An agreement to defraud is an agreement to deceive or to cheat, but one who acts on an honest and good faith misunderstanding as to the requirements of the law does not act with an intent to defraud simply because [his] [her] understanding of the law is wrong or even irrational. Nevertheless, merely disagreeing with the law does not constitute a good faith misunderstanding of the law because all persons have a duty to obey the law whether or not they agree with it.
This language is derived by analogy to cases recognizing a “good faith” defense when the government must prove a defendant “willfully” violated tax laws. See Instruction 9.42 (Willfully—Defined) for violations of 26 U.S.C. §§ 201, 7203, 7206, and 7207; but see United States v. Hickey, 580 F. 3d 922, 931 (9th Cir.2009) (no good faith instruction needed when jury properly instructed on intent to defraud).
Approved 3/2015
8.22 MULTIPLE CONSPIRACIES
You must decide whether the conspiracy charged in the indictment existed, and, if it did, who at least some of its members were. If you find that the conspiracy charged did not exist, then you must return a not guilty verdict, even though you may find that some other conspiracy existed. Similarly, if you find that any defendant was not a member of the charged conspiracy, then you must find that defendant not guilty, even though that defendant may have been a member of some other conspiracy.
Comment
Use this instruction when the indictment charges a single conspiracy and the evidence indicates two or more possible conspiracies. See United States v. Perry, 550 F.2d 524, 533 (9th Cir.1997).
This instruction obviates the need for further instructions on multiple conspiracies. United States v. Si, 343 F.3d 1116, 1126–27 (9th Cir.2003). Given in combination with a proper conspiracy instruction, this instruction is adequate to cover a multiple conspiracy defense.
United States v. Bauer, 84 F.3d 1549, 1560–61 (9th Cir.1996).
8.23 CONSPIRACY—KNOWLEDGE OF AND
ASSOCIATION WITH OTHER CONSPIRATORS
A conspiracy may continue for a long period of time and may include the performance of many transactions. It is not necessary that all members of the conspiracy join it at the same time, and one may become a member of a conspiracy without full knowledge of all the details of the unlawful scheme or the names, identities, or locations of all of the other members.
Even though a defendant did not directly conspire with [the other defendant] [or] [other conspirators] in the overall scheme, the defendant has, in effect, agreed to participate in the conspiracy if the government proves each of the following beyond a reasonable doubt that:
- the defendant directly conspired with one or more conspirators to carry out at leastone of the objects of the conspiracy;
- the defendant knew or had reason to know that other conspirators were involved withthose with whom the defendant directly conspired; and
- the defendant had reason to believe that whatever benefits the defendant might getfrom the conspiracy were probably dependent upon the success of the entire venture.
It is not a defense that a person’s participation in a conspiracy was minor or for a short period of time.
Comment
A person may be a member of a conspiracy even though the person does not know all of the purposes of or participants in the conspiracy. United States v. Escalante, 637 F.2d 1197, 1200 (9th Cir.1980); United States v. Kearney, 560 F.2d 1358, 1362 (9th Cir.1977).
A single conspiracy can be established even though it took place during a long period of time during which new members joined and old members dropped out. United States v. Green, 523 F.2d 229, 233 (2d Cir.1975). See also United States v. Perry, 550 F.2d 524, 528 (9th Cir.1997) (holding that the law of conspiracy does not require the government “to prove that all of the defendants met together at the same time and ratified the illegal scheme”); United States v. Thomas, 586 F.2d 123, 132 (9th Cir.1978) (holding that proof that the defendant “knew he was plotting in concert with others to violate the law was sufficient to raise the necessary inference that he joined in the overall agreement”).
To prove a conspiracy “the evidence must show that ‘each defendant knew, or had reason to know, that his benefits were probably dependent on the success of the entire operation.’” United States v. Duran, 189 F.3d 1071, 1080 (9th Cir.1999) (quoting United States v. Kearney, 560 F.2d 1358, 1362 (9th Cir.1977)).
8.24 WITHDRAWAL FROM CONSPIRACY
Once a person becomes a member of a conspiracy, that person remains a member until that person withdraws from it. One may withdraw by doing acts which are inconsistent with the purpose of the conspiracy and by making reasonable efforts to tell the co-conspirators about those acts. You may consider any definite, positive step that shows that the conspirator is no longer a member of the conspiracy to be evidence of withdrawal.
If you find that the government has proved beyond a reasonable doubt each element of a conspiracy and that the defendant was a member of the conspiracy, the burden is on the defendant to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that [he] [she] withdrew from the conspiracy before the overt act—on which you all agreed—was committed by some member of the conspiracy. A preponderance of the evidence means that you must be persuaded that the things the defendant seeks to prove are more probably true than not true. This is a lesser burden of proof than the government’s burden to prove beyond a reasonable doubt each element of the conspiracy and that the defendant was a member of the conspiracy.
If you find that the defendant withdrew from the conspiracy, you must find the defendant not guilty of [specify crime charged].
Comment
This instruction has been modified to place the burden on the defendant to prove by a preponderance of the evidence his or her withdrawal from the conspiracy. The earlier version of the instruction placed the burden on the government to prove that the defendant did not withdraw from the conspiracy before the overt act was committed by some member of the conspiracy. In Smith v. United States, 133 S. Ct. 714 (2013), the Court held that “establishing individual withdrawal was a burden that rested firmly on the defendant regardless of when the purported withdrawal took place.” Id. at 719.
Use this instruction only when the conspiracy charged in the indictment requires proof of an overt act. If the statute of limitations is a defense to a conspiracy requiring proof of an overt act, the instruction should be modified to require the defendant to prove withdrawal before the limitations period begins. Id. at 717 (“A defendant who withdraws outside the relevant statuteof-limitations period has a complete defense to prosecution.”).
Approved 4/2013
8.25 CONSPIRACY—LIABILITY FOR SUBSTANTIVE OFFENSE COMMITTED BY CO-CONSPIRATOR (PINKERTON CHARGE)
Each member of the conspiracy is responsible for the actions of the other conspirators performed during the course and in furtherance of the conspiracy. If one member of a conspiracy commits a crime in furtherance of a conspiracy, the other members have also, under the law, committed that crime.
Therefore, you may find the defendant guilty of [specify crime] as charged in Count _______ of the indictment if the government has proved each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, a person named in Count _______ of the indictment committed the crime of
[specify crime] as alleged in that count;
Second, the person was a member of the conspiracy charged in Count _______ of the indictment;
Third, the person committed the crime of [specify crime] in furtherance of the conspiracy;
Fourth, the defendant was a member of the same conspiracy at the time the offense charged in Count _______ was committed; and
Fifth, the offense fell within the scope of the unlawful agreement and could reasonably have been foreseen to be a necessary or natural consequence of the unlawful agreement.
Comment
The Pinkerton charge derives its name from Pinkerton v. United States, 328 U.S. 640 (1946), which held that a defendant could be held liable for a substantive offense committed by a co-conspirator as long as the offense occurred within the course of the conspiracy, was within the scope of the agreement, and could reasonably have been foreseen as a necessary or natural consequence of the unlawful agreement. United States v. Alvarez-Valenzuela, 231 F.3d 1198, 1202 (9th Cir.2000).
When this instruction is appropriate, it should be given in addition to Instruction 8.20 (Conspiracy—Elements).
This instruction is based upon United States v. Alvarez-Valenzuela, 231 F.3d at 1202-03, in which the Ninth Circuit approved of the 1997 version of Instruction 8.5.5 (Conspiracy—Pinkerton Charge), and United States v. Montgomery, 150 F.3d 983, 996-97 (9th Cir.1998). See also United States v. Gadson, 763 F.3d 1189 (9th Cir.2014).
This instruction was found adequate in a case in which three separate conspiracies were charged. See United States v. Moran, 493 F.3d 1002 (9th Cir.2007). However, given the potential for ambiguity where more than one conspiracy is charged, the court should consider giving separate Pinkerton instructionsfor each conspiracy charged.
Approved 3/2015
8.26 CONSPIRACY—SEARS CHARGE
Before being convicted of conspiracy, an individual must conspire with at least one co–conspirator. There can be no conspiracy when the only person with whom the defendant allegedly conspired was a government [agent] [informer] who secretly intended to frustrate the conspiracy.
Comment
This instruction is based upon Sears v. United States, 343 F.2d 139, 142 (5th Cir.1965), which held that “there can be no indictable conspiracy with a government informer who secretly intends to frustrate the conspiracy.” This rule has been adopted in the Ninth Circuit. United States v. Romero, 282 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir.2002) (citing earlier cases).
8.27 COUNTERFEITING
(18 U.S.C. § 471)
The defendant is charged in [Count _______ of] the indictment with counterfeiting in violation of Section 471 of Title 18 of the United States Code. In order for the defendant to be found guilty of that charge, the government must prove each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, the defendant [[falsely made] [forged] [counterfeited] [altered]] [specify obligation or security of United States]; and
Second, the defendant acted with intent to defraud.
To be counterfeit, [specify item] must have a likeness or resemblance to the genuine [specify obligation or security of United States].
Comment
For a definition of “intent to defraud,” see Instruction 3.16 (Intent to Defraud—Defined).
See United States v. Johnson, 434 F.2d 827, 829 (9th Cir.1970), regarding the requirement for likeness or resemblance to the genuine obligation or security.
8.28 PASSING COUNTERFEIT OBLIGATIONS
(18 U.S.C. § 472)
The defendant is charged in [Count _______ of] the indictment with [[passing] [uttering] [publishing] [selling]] [[attempting to [pass] [utter] [publish] [sell]] a counterfeit obligation in violation of Section 472 of Title 18 of the United States Code. In order for the defendant to be found guilty of that charge, the government must prove each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, the defendant [[passed] [uttered] [published] [sold]] [[attempted to [pass] [utter] [publish] [sell]] a [[falsely made] [forged] [counterfeit] [altered]] [specify obligation or security of United States];
Second, the defendant knew that the [specify obligation or security of United States] was
[falsely made] [forged] [counterfeited] [altered]; [and]
Third, the defendant acted with the intent to defraud[.] [; and]
[Fourth, the defendant did something that was a substantial step toward committing the crime.
Mere preparation is not a substantial step toward committing the crime. To constitute a substantial step, a defendant’s act or actions must demonstrate that the crime will take place unless interrupted by independent circumstances.]
To be counterfeit, a bill must have a likeness or resemblance to the genuine [specify obligation or security of United States].
Comment
For a definition of “intent to defraud,” see Instruction 3.16 (Intent to Defraud—Defined).
An utterance has been described as tantamount to an offer. United States v. Chang, 207 F.3d 1169, 1174 (9th Cir.2000).
For an attempt to commit the crime, jurors do not need to agree unanimously as to which particular act or actions constituted a substantial step toward the commission of the crime.
United States v. Hofus, 598 F.3d 1171, 1176 (9th Cir.2010).
8.29 CONNECTING PARTS OF GENUINE INSTRUMENTS
(18 U.S.C. § 484)
The defendant is charged in [Count _______ of] the indictment with connecting parts of two or more [specify genuine instrument] in violation of Section 484 of Title 18 of the United States Code. In order for the defendant to be found guilty of that charge, the government must prove each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, the defendant connected together parts of two or more [specify genuine instrument] issued under the authority of [specify issuer]; and
Second, the defendant did so with the intent to defraud.
Comment
For a definition of “intent to defraud,” see Instruction 3.16 (Intent to Defraud—Defined).
8.30 FALSELY MAKING, ALTERING, FORGING OR COUNTERFEITING A WRITING TO OBTAIN MONEY FROM UNITED STATES
(18 U.S.C. § 495)
The defendant is charged in [Count _______ of] the indictment with falsely making, altering, forging, or counterfeiting [specify writing] in violation of Section 495 of Title 18 of the United States Code. In order for the defendant to be found guilty of that charge, the government must prove each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, the defendant [falsely made] [altered] [forged] [counterfeited] [specify writing]; and
Second, the defendant did so for the purpose [of obtaining or receiving] [enabling another person to obtain or receive] money from [the United States] [an officer of the United States] [an agent of the United States].
8.31 UTTERING OR PUBLISHING FALSE WRITING
(18 U.S.C. § 495)
The defendant is charged in [Count _______ of] the indictment with [uttering]
[publishing] as true a false writing with the intent to defraud the United States in violation of Section 495 of Title 18 of the United States Code. In order for the defendant to be found guilty of that charge, the government must prove each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, the defendant [uttered] [published] as true a [falsely made] [altered] [forged] [counterfeit] [specify writing];
Second, the defendant knew that the [specify writing] was [falsely made] [altered] [forged] [counterfeited]; and
Third, the defendant acted with the intent to defraud the United States.
Comment
For a definition of “intent to defraud,” see Instruction 3.16 (Intent to Defraud—Defined).
An utterance has been described as tantamount to an offer. United States v. Chang, 207 F.3d 1169, 1174 (9th Cir.2000).
8.32 TRANSMITTING OR PRESENTING FALSE WRITING TO DEFRAUD UNITED STATES
(18 U.S.C. § 495)
The defendant is charged in [Count _______ of] the indictment with [transmitting] [presenting] a false writing in support of or in relation to an account or claim with intent to defraud the United States. In order for the defendant to be found guilty of that charge, the government must prove each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, the defendant [transmitted] [presented] a [falsely made] [altered] [forged]
[counterfeit] [specify writing] to an [officer] of the United States;
Second, the defendant knew that the [specify writing] was [falsely made] [altered] [forged] [counterfeit];
Third, the [specify writing] was [transmitted] [presented] in support of [specify account or claim];
Fourth, the defendant acted with intent to defraud the United States; and
Fifth, the [specify writing] was material to action on the [specify account or claim]; that is, the [specify writing] had a natural tendency to influence, or was capable of influencing, action on the [specify account or claim].
Comment
For a definition of “intent to defraud,” see Instruction 3.16 (Intent to Defraud—Defined).
In Neder v. United States, 527 U.S. 1, 22-23 (1999), the Court explained that materiality is a necessary aspect of the legal concept of fraud which is incorporated into criminal statutes concerning fraud unless the statute says otherwise (holding materiality of falsehood must be proved in prosecution under bank, mail and wire fraud statutes). The common law test for materiality in the false statement statutes, as reflected in the fifth element of this instruction, is the preferred formulation. United States v. Peterson, 538 F.3d 1064, 1072 (9th Cir.2008).
8.33 FORGING ENDORSEMENT ON TREASURY CHECK, BOND OR
SECURITY OF UNITED STATES
(18 U.S.C. § 510(a)(1))
The defendant is charged in [Count _______ of] the indictment with forging or falsely making [an endorsement] [a signature] on a Treasury [check] [bond] [security] of the United States in violation of Section 510 of Title 18 of the United States Code. In order for the defendant to be found guilty of that charge, the government must prove each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, the defendant falsely made or forged [an endorsement] [a signature] on a Treasury
[check] [bond] [security] of the United States; and
Second, the defendant did so with intent to defraud.
Comment
For a definition of “intent to defraud,” see Instruction 3.16 (Intent to Defraud—Defined).
8.34 PASSING FORGED ENDORSEMENT ON TREASURY CHECK, BOND OR
SECURITY OF UNITED STATES
(18 U.S.C. § 510(a)(2))
The defendant is charged in [Count _______ of] the indictment with [passing] [uttering] [publishing] [[attempting to [pass] [utter] [publish]] a Treasury [check] [bond] [security] of the United States in violation of Section 510 of Title 18 of the United States Code. In order for the defendant to be found guilty of that charge, the government must prove each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, the defendant [passed] [uttered] [published] [[attempted to [pass] [utter] [publish]] a Treasury [check] [bond] [security] of the United States which bore a falsely made or forged [endorsement] [signature]; [and]
Second, the defendant did so with intent to defraud[.] [; and]
[Third, the defendant did something that was a substantial step toward committing the crime.
Mere preparation is not a substantial step toward committing the crime. To constitute a substantial step, a defendant’s act or actions must demonstrate that the crime will take place unless interrupted by independent circumstances.]
Comment
For a definition of “intent to defraud,” see Instruction 3.16 (Intent to Defraud—Defined).
For an attempt to commit the crime, jurors do not need to agree unanimously as to which particular act or actions constituted a substantial step toward the commission of the crime. United States v. Hofus, 598 F.3d 1171, 1176 (9th Cir.2010).
An utterance has been described as tantamount to an offer. United States v. Chang, 207 F.3d 1169, 1174 (9th Cir.2000).
8.35 SMUGGLING GOODS
(18 U.S.C. § 545)
The defendant is charged in [Count _______ of] the indictment with [smuggling] [attempting to smuggle] in violation of Section 545 of Title 18 of the United States Code. In order for the defendant to be found guilty of that charge, the government must prove each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, the defendant knowingly [smuggled] [attempted to smuggle] merchandise into the
United States without declaring the merchandise for invoicing as required by United States
Customs law;
Second, the defendant knew that the merchandise was of a type that should have been declared; [and]
Third, the defendant acted willfully with intent to defraud the United States[.] [; and]
[Fourth, the defendant did something that was a substantial step toward committing the crime.
Mere preparation is not a substantial step toward committing the crime. To constitute a substantial step, a defendant’s act or actions must demonstrate that the crime will take place unless interrupted by independent circumstances.]
Comment
See Comment in 5.5 (Willfully).
This instruction may be used when the defendant is charged with the crime of smuggling goods or attempting to smuggle goods. The bracketed fourth element should be used when defendant is charged with an attempt to smuggle goods. For an attempt to commit the crime, jurors do not need to agree unanimously as to which particular act or actions constituted a substantial step toward the commission of the crime. United States v. Hofus, 598 F.3d 1171, 1176 (9th Cir.2010).
This instruction relates to the first clause of the first paragraph of 18 U.S.C. § 545. If the charge is based on the second clause of the first paragraph, use Instruction 8.36 (Passing False Papers Through Customhouse). Instructions 8.37 (Importing Merchandise Illegally) and 8.38 (Receiving, Concealing, Buying or Selling Smuggled Merchandise) concern violations of the second paragraph of § 545.
See United States v. Garcia-Paz, 282 F.3d 1212, 1214-15 (9th Cir.2002) (court properly instructed jury that marijuana constitutes “merchandise” for purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 545).
8.36 PASSING FALSE PAPERS THROUGH CUSTOMHOUSE
(18 U.S.C. § 545)
The defendant is charged in [Count _______ of] the indictment with [passing]
[attempting to pass] a [[false] [forged] [fraudulent]] [specify writing] in violation of Section 545 of Title 18 of the United States Code. In order for the defendant to be found guilty of that charge, the government must prove each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, the defendant knowingly [[passed] [attempted to pass]] [specify writing] through a customhouse of the United States;
Second, the defendant knew that the [specify writing] was [false] [forged] [fraudulent];
Third, the defendant acted willfully with intent to defraud the United States; [and]
Fourth, the [specify writing] had a natural tendency to influence, or was capable of influencing, action by the United States[.] [; and]
[Fifth, the defendant did something that was a substantial step toward committing the crime.
Mere preparation is not a substantial step toward committing the crime. To constitute a substantial step, a defendant’s act or actions must demonstrate that the crime will take place unless interrupted by independent circumstances.]
Comment
See Comment in 5.5 (Willfully).
This instruction may be used when the defendant is charged with the crime of passing false papers through a customhouse. The bracketed fifth element should be used when defendant is charged with an attempt to do so. For an attempt to commit the crime, jurors do not need to agree unanimously as to which particular act or actions constituted a substantial step toward the commission of the crime. United States v. Hofus, 598 F.3d 1171, 1176 (9th Cir.2010).
This instruction relates to the second clause of the first paragraph of 18 U.S.C. § 545. If the charge is based on the first clause of the first paragraph, use Instruction 8.35 (Smuggling Goods). Instructions 8.37 (Importing Merchandise Illegally) and 8.38 (Receiving, Concealing,
Buying or Selling Smuggled Merchandise) concern violations of the second paragraph of § 545.
In Neder v. United States, 527 U.S. 1 (1999), the Court explained that materiality is a
necessary aspect of the legal concept of fraud which is incorporated into criminal statutes concerning fraud unless the statute says otherwise. Id. at 22-23 (holding materiality of falsehood must be proved in prosecution under bank, mail and wire fraud statutes). The common law test for materiality in the false statement statutes, as reflected in the third element of this instruction, is the preferred formulation. United States v. Peterson, 538 F.3d 1064, 1072 (9th Cir.2008).
8.37 IMPORTING MERCHANDISE ILLEGALLY
(18 U.S.C. § 545)
The defendant is charged in [Count _______ of] the indictment with [[fraudulently]
[knowingly]] [[importing] [bringing]] into the United States merchandise in violation of Section 545 of the United States Code. In order for the defendant to be found guilty of that charge, the government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant [[fraudulently] [knowingly]] [[imported] [brought]] merchandise into the United States contrary to [specify law].
Comment
This instruction deals with the first clause of the second paragraph of 18 U.S.C. § 545. If the charge is a violation of the second clause of the second paragraph, use Instruction 8.38
(Receiving, Concealing, Buying or Selling Smuggled Merchandise). Instructions 8.35 (Smuggling Goods) and 8.36 (Passing False Papers Through Customhouse) deal with violations of the first paragraph of § 545.
The term “law” in § 545 includes a regulation as well as a statute, but only when there is a statute which specifies that a violation of the regulation is a crime. United States v. Alghazouli, 517 F.3d 1179, 1183 (9th Cir.2008).
See United States v. Garcia-Paz, 282 F.3d 1212, 1214-15 (9th Cir.2002) (court properly instructed jury that marijuana constitutes “merchandise” for purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 545).
8.38 RECEIVING, CONCEALING, BUYING
OR SELLING SMUGGLED MERCHANDISE
(18 U.S.C. § 545)
The defendant is charged in [Count _______ of] the indictment with [[receiving] [concealing] [buying] [selling]] [[facilitating [the transportation] [concealment] [sale] of]] smuggled merchandise in violation of Section 545 of Title 18 of the United States Code. In order for the defendant to be found guilty of that charge, the government must prove each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, merchandise had been brought into the United States contrary to [specify law]; and
Second, the defendant [[received] [concealed] [bought] [sold]] [[facilitated the
[transportation] [concealment] [sale] of]] the merchandise knowing that it had been brought into the United States contrary to law.
Comment
This instruction relates to the second clause of the second paragraph of 18 U.S.C. § 545.
If the charge is a violation of the first clause of the second paragraph, use Instruction 8.37
(Importing Merchandise Illegally). Instructions 8.35 (Smuggling Goods) and 8.36 (Passing False Papers Through Customhouse) deal with violations of the first paragraph of § 545.
The term “law” in § 545 includes a regulation as well as a statute, but only when there is a statute which specifies that a violation of the regulation is a crime. United States v. Alghazouli, 517 F.3d 1179, 1183 (9th Cir.2008).
See United States v. Garcia-Paz, 282 F.3d 1212, 1214-15 (9th Cir.2002) (court properly instructed jury that marijuana constitutes “merchandise” for purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 545).
8.39 THEFT OF GOVERNMENT MONEY OR PROPERTY
(18 U.S.C. § 641)
The defendant is charged in [Count _______ of] the indictment with theft of government [money] [property] in violation of Section 641 of Title 18 of the United States Code. In order for the defendant to be found guilty of that charge, the government must prove each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, the defendant knowingly [[embezzled] [stole] [converted to defendant’s use] [converted to the use of another]] [money] [property of value] with the intention of depriving the owner of the use or benefit of the [money] [property];
Second, the [money] [property] belonged to the United States; and Third, the value of the [money] [property] was more than $1,000.
Comment
This instruction deals with the first paragraph of 18 U.S.C. § 641. Instruction 8.40 (Receiving Stolen Government Money or Property) deals with the second paragraph of § 641.
Theft of money or property having a value of $1,000 or less is a misdemeanor. 18 U.S.C. § 641. If the crime charged is a misdemeanor, the third element of this instruction should be omitted.
Knowledge that stolen property belonged to the United States is not an element of the offense. Baker v. United States, 429 F.2d 1278, 1279 (9th Cir.1970).
See United States v. Campbell, 42 F.3d 1199, 1205 (9th Cir.1994) (government must prove that defendant stole property with the intention of depriving the owner of the use or benefit of the property).
8.40 RECEIVING STOLEN
GOVERNMENT MONEY OR PROPERTY
(18 U.S.C. § 641)
The defendant is charged in [Count _______ of] the indictment with [[receiving] [concealing] [retaining]] [[embezzled] [stolen] [converted]] government [money] [property] in violation of Section 641 of Title 18 of the United States Code. In order for the defendant to be found guilty of that charge, the government must prove each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, the defendant knowingly [[received] [concealed] [retained]] [[money] [property of value]];
Second, the [money] [property] belonged to the United States;
Third, the defendant knew that the [money] [property] had been [embezzled] [stolen]
[converted];
Fourth, the defendant intended to convert the [money] [property] to [his] [her] own use or gain; and
Fifth, the value of the [money] [property] was more than $1,000.
Comment
See Comment to Instruction 8.39 (Theft of Government Money or Property).
Approved 7/2011
8.41 THEFT, EMBEZZLEMENT OR
MISAPPLICATION OF BANK FUNDS
(18 U.S.C. § 656)
The defendant is charged in [Count _______ of] the indictment with [theft]
[embezzlement] [misapplication] of bank funds in violation of Section 656 of Title 18 of the United States Code. In order for the defendant to be found guilty of that charge, the government must prove each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, the defendant was a [specify position held] of the [specify financial institution];
Second, the defendant knowingly and willfully [stole] [embezzled] [misapplied] funds or credits belonging to the bank or entrusted to its care in excess of $1,000;
Third, the defendant acted with the intent to injure or defraud the [specify financial institution];
Fourth, the [specify financial institution] was [specify Section 656 status]; and Fifth, the amount of money taken was more than $1,000.
The fact that the defendant may have intended to repay the funds at the time they were taken is not a defense.
Comment
Although not found in the statute, “intent to injure or defraud” has been held to be an essential element of the crime. United States v. Stozek,783 F.2d 891, 893 (9th Cir.1986). “Intent to defraud may be inferred from a defendant’s reckless disregard of the bank’s interests.” United States v. Castro, 887 F.2d 994 (9th Cir.1989) (citing Stozek, 783 F.2d at 893).
If the crime charged is a misdemeanor, the fifth element of this instruction should be omitted.
8.42 EMBEZZLEMENT OR MISAPPLICATION BY OFFICER OR EMPLOYEE
OF LENDING, CREDIT OR INSURANCE INSTITUTION
(18 U.S.C. § 657)
Comment
The Committee recommends that when a defendant is accused of embezzlement or willful misapplication in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 657, Instruction 8.41 (Theft, Embezzlement or Misapplication of Bank Funds) should be used with appropriate modifications. Section 656 and Section 657 contain the same elements. United States v. Musacchio, 968 F.2d 782, 787 n.6 (9th Cir.1991).
8.43 THEFT FROM INTERSTATE OR FOREIGN SHIPMENT
(18 U.S.C. § 659)
The defendant is charged in [Count _______ of] the indictment with theft from [an interstate] [a foreign] shipment in violation of Section 659 of Title 18 of the United States Code. In order for the defendant to be found guilty of that charge, the government must prove each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, the defendant stole the property described in the indictment from a shipment in
[interstate] [foreign] commerce; [and]
Second, the defendant did so with the intent to convert the property to [his] [her] own use[.] [; and]
[Third, the property had a value of $1,000 or more.]
Property is moving as or is [a part of] a shipment in [interstate] [foreign] commerce if the point of origin is in one [state] [country] and the destination is another [state] [country]. Property is moving as [an interstate] [a foreign] shipment at all points between the point of origin and the final destination, regardless of any temporary stop while awaiting transshipment or otherwise.
Comment
This instruction deals with theft from a shipment in interstate or foreign commerce subject to the first paragraph of 18 U.S.C. § 659. If the charge under the first paragraph of § 659 is based on conduct other than theft, modify the instruction accordingly.
If the charge alleges that the value of the property was $1,000 or more, use the third element; otherwise it should be omitted.
8.44 ESCAPE FROM CUSTODY
(18 U.S.C. § 751(a))
The defendant is charged in [Count _______ of] the indictment with escape from custody in violation of Section 751(a) of Title 18 of the United States Code. In order for the defendant to be found guilty of that charge, the government must prove each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, the defendant was in the custody of [specify custodian];
Second, the defendant was in custody by virtue of [specify reason for or type of custody]; and
Third, the defendant knowingly and voluntarily left custody without permission.
Comment
An intent to avoid confinement is not an element of escape. United States v. Bailey, 444 U.S. 394, 408 (1980).
Section 751(a) provides a maximum punishment of one year in prison for certain types of custody, such as custody imposed by virtue of an arrest for a misdemeanor, and a maximum punishment of five years in prison for other types of custody, such as custody imposed by virtue of a felony arrest. It is therefore necessary to include the type of custody in the instruction. Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000) (other than fact of prior conviction, any fact which increases statutory maximum must be submitted to jury).
8.45 ATTEMPTED ESCAPE
(18 U.S.C. § 751(a))
The defendant is charged in [Count _______ of] the indictment with attempted escape in violation of Section 751(a) of Title 18 of the United States Code. In order for the defendant to be found guilty of that charge, the government must prove each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, the defendant was in the custody of [specify custodian];
Second, the defendant was in custody by virtue of [specify reason for or type of custody];
Third, the defendant intended to escape from custody; and
Fourth, the defendant did something that was a substantial step toward escaping from custody.
Mere preparation is not a substantial step toward committing the crime. To constitute a substantial step, a defendant’s act or actions must demonstrate that the crime will take place unless interrupted by independent circumstances.
Comment
See Comment to Instruction 8.44 (Escape from Custody).
Jurors do not need to agree unanimously as to which particular act or actions constituted a substantial step toward the commission of a crime. United States v. Hofus, 598 F.3d 1171, 1176 (9th Cir.2010).
8.46 ASSISTING ESCAPE
(18 U.S.C. § 752(a))
The defendant is charged in [Count _______ of] the indictment with assisting escape in violation of Section 752(a) of Title 18 of the United States Code. In order for the defendant to be found guilty of that charge, the government must prove each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, [name of escapee] was in the custody of [specify custodian] by virtue of [specify reason for or type of custody];
Second, [name of escapee] [[left] [attempted to leave]] [his] [her] custody, without permission;
Third, the defendant knew that [name of escapee] did not have permission to leave; and Fourth, the defendant assisted [name of escapee] in [leaving] [attempting to leave].
Comment
Section 752(a) provides a maximum punishment of one year in prison for certain types of custody, such as custody imposed by virtue of an arrest for a misdemeanor, and a maximum punishment of five years in prison for other types of custody, such as custody imposed by virtue of a felony arrest. It is therefore necessary to include the type of custody in the instruction. Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000) (other than prior conviction, any fact which increases statutory maximum must be submitted to jury).
8.47 THREATS AGAINST THE PRESIDENT
(18 U.S.C. § 871)
The defendant is charged in [Count _______ of] the indictment with making a threat against the President of the United States in violation of Section 871 of Title 18 of the United States Code. In order for the defendant to be found guilty of that charge, the government must prove each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, the defendant intentionally threatened, either in writing or orally, to [kill] [injure]
[kidnap] the President of the United States; and
Second, the defendant intended that the written or oral statement be taken as a threat.
Third, under the circumstances in which the threat was made, a reasonable person would foresee that it would be understood by persons hearing or reading it as a serious expression of an intention to [kill] [injure] [kidnap] the President of the United States.
Comment
The requirement that the government prove the defendant’s subjective intent “must be read into all threat statutes that criminalize pure speech.” United States v. Bagdasarian, 652 F.3d 1113, 1117-18 (9th Cir. 2011). The Ninth Circuit notes that “with respect to some threat statutes, we require the purported threat meet an objective standard in addition,and for some we do not.” Id. at 1117. Section 871(a) is among the statutes subject to both the subjective and the objective standards. Id. See also id. at 1118 (stating that the subjective and objective standards apply to 18 U.S.C. § 879(a)).
The President need not have received the threat. Romo, 413 F.3d at 1051.
If the defendant is charged with threatening the Vice President or another officer next in the order of succession to the office of President, the instruction should be modified accordingly.
Approved 8/2012
8.47A MAILING THREATENING COMMUNICATIONS—THREATS
TO KIDNAP OR INJURE
(18 U.S.C. § 876(c))
The defendant is charged in [Count _______ ] of the indictment with mailing threatening communications in violation of Section 876(c) of Title 18 of the United States Code. In order for the defendant to be found guilty of that charge, the government must prove each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, the defendant knowingly [mailed] [arranged to have mailed] a [letter] [insert other form of communication] addressed to [insert name or title of natural person] containing a threat to [kidnap] [injure] any person.
Second, the defendant intended to communicate a threat.
A communication is a threat if, under the circumstances, a reasonable person would foresee that the communication would be interpreted by a recipient as a serious expression of intent to [injure] [kidnap]. The government need not prove that the defendant intended to carry out the threat.
Comment
This instruction is based on United States v. Keyser, 704 F.3d 631 (9th Cir. 2012), United States v. Havelock, 664 F.3d 1284 (9th Cir. 2012), United States v. King, 122 F.3d 808 (9th Cir.
1997), United States v. Twine, 853 F.2d 676 (9th Cir. 1988), and United States v. Sirhan, 504 F.2d 818, 820 (9th Cir. 1974). While the Ninth Circuit has not offered comprehensive guidance concerning the requirements for conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 876, these cases are instructive.
Under 18 U.S.C. § 876, the threatening communications must be addressed to a natural person. Havelock, 664 F.3d at 1286. “[I]n order to determine whom a threatening communication is ‘addressed to,’ a court may consult the directions on the outside of the envelope or the packaging, the salutation line, if any, and the contents of the communication.” Id. at 1296. A general title such as “manager” is sufficient to meet this requirement. Keyser, 704 F.3d at 641.
“Whether a particular statement may properly be considered to be a threat is governed by an objective standard—whether a reasonable person would foresee that the statement would be interpreted by those to whom the maker communicates the statement as a serious expression of intent to harm or assault.” Id. at 638 (quoting United States v. Orozco-Santillan, 903 F.2d 1262, 1265 (9th Cir. 1990)).
There are two specific intent elements in 18 U.S.C. § 876. The defendant must have both
“knowingly” transmitted the communication and subjectively intended to threaten. Twine, 853 F.2d at 680; Keyser, 704 F.3d at 638 (“In order to be subject to criminal liability for a threat, the speaker must subjectively intend to threaten.”). However, the defendant need not have expected the threats to gain him a benefit, or have had the intent or ability to actually carry out the threat. Planned Parenthood of the Columbia/Williamette, Inc. v. Am. Coalition of Life Activists, 290 F.3d 1058, 1076 n.9 (9th Cir. 2002); King, 122 F.3d at 809.
Approved 4/2013
8.48 EXTORTIONATE CREDIT TRANSACTIONS
(18 U.S.C. § 892)
The defendant is charged in [Count _______ of] the indictment with making an extortionate extension of credit in violation of Section 892 of Title 18 of the United States Code. In order for the defendant to be found guilty of that charge, the government must prove each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, the defendant knowingly extended credit to [name of debtor]; and
Second, at the time the credit was extended, the defendant as a creditor and [name of debtor] as a debtor both understood that delay or failure in making repayment could result in the use of violence or other criminal means to harm the person, reputation, or property of some person.
8.49 FALSE IMPERSONATION OF CITIZEN OF UNITED STATES
(18 U.S.C. § 911)
The defendant is charged in [Count _______ of] the indictment with misrepresenting [himself] [herself] to be a citizen of the United States. In order for the defendant to be found guilty of that charge, the government must prove each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, the defendant directly and falsely represented [himself] [herself] to be a citizen of the United States;
Second, the defendant was not a citizen of the United States at that time;
Third, the defendant made such false representation willfully, that is, the misrepresentation was voluntarily and deliberately made; and
Fourth, the false representation was made to someone who had good reason to make inquiry into defendant’s citizenship status.
Comment
In United States v. Anguiano-Morfin, 713 F.3d 1208 (9th Cir.2013), the Ninth Circuit explained that, when a defendant charged with falsely impersonating a United States citizen relies on the defense that he genuinely believed that he was a United States citizen, the “best course” is to instruct the jury that the government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant knew that his claim to United States citizenship was false, and that a “reasonable doubt as to whether the defendant knew his claim to United States citizenship was false” must result in an acquittal. Id. at 1210. The Ninth Circuit explained that in such cases the jury instructions should make clear that the defendant’s subjective belief is the dispositive issue. Id.
In United States v. Karaouni, 379 F.3d 1139, 1144 (9th Cir.2004), the Ninth Circuit held that the representation must be “direct” and that a statement from which United States citizenship could be inferred is insufficient. “Willfully” requires proof “that the
misrepresentation was deliberate and voluntary.” Id. at 1142. The fourth element is required by Ninth Circuit case law limiting the reach of the statute to avoid First Amendment overbreadth issues. Id. at 1142 n.7.
Approved 7/2013
8.50 FALSE IMPERSONATION OF FEDERAL OFFICER
OR EMPLOYEE
(18 U.S.C. § 912)
The defendant is charged in [Count _______ of] the indictment with fraud while impersonating a federal officer or employee in violation of Section 912 of Title 18 of the United States Code. In order for the defendant to be found guilty of that charge, the government must prove each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, the defendant falsely pretended to be an [officer] [employee] acting under the authority of [the United States] [specify federal department, agency or officer]; and
Second, the defendant [acted as such] [in such pretended character demanded or obtained [specify thing of value]].
Comment
Two options are afforded for the second element because 18 U.S.C. § 912 states two offenses. It has been held to be duplicitous to charge both falsely acting as a federal officer and demanding or obtaining money while falsely acting as a federal officer in a single count. United States v. Aguilar, 756 F.2d 1418, 1422 (9th Cir.1985).
8.51 FIREARMS
Comment
Definitions of many of the terms used in the firearms statutes are found in 18 U.S.C. § 921 and 26 U.S.C. § 5845. The Committee recommends that definitional instructions be used sparingly. Many of the terms defined are of common significance and really require no definition. Some examples are “pistol,” “rifle,” “importer,” and “manufacturer.” While jurors will readily recognize that one who is engaged in the business of buying and selling firearms is a dealer, they probably do not know that one engaged in the business of repairing firearms is also a dealer, 18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(11)(B), and in that case a definition would be necessary.
The most effective way to avoid definitions relating to firearms is to use the most specific designation available. For example, assume that a defendant is being tried for transporting a rocket having a propellant charge of more than four ounces in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(4). Examples of the ways the judge might instruct the jury on one of the elements are as follows:
- “The defendant transported a firearm.” It will then be necessary to have an additionalinstruction that a rocket having a propellant charge of more than four ounces is a firearm. See 18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(3)(D) (defining “firearm” as including “destructive device”) and 18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(4)(A)(iii) (defining “destructive device” as including a “rocket having a propellant charge of more than four ounces); or
- “The defendant transported a destructive device.” Even here, it will then be necessaryto instruct that a rocket having a propellant charge of more than four ounces is a destructive device. Id.; or
- “The defendant transported a rocket having a propellant charge of more than fourounces.” Using the third alternative, no additional instruction is necessary.
8.52 FIREARMS—FUGITIVE FROM JUSTICE DEFINED
(18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(15))
A fugitive from justice is a person who has fled from any state to avoid prosecution for a crime or to avoid giving testimony in any criminal proceeding.
Comment
This instruction is appropriate when a firearms offense involves a fugitive from justice.
See 18 U.S.C. § 922(d)(2) and (g)(2).
8.53 FIREARMS—DEALING, IMPORTING OR MANUFACTURING WITHOUT LICENSE
(18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(1)(A) and (B))
The defendant is charged in [Count _______ of] the indictment with [dealing]
[importing] [manufacturing] firearms without a license, in violation of Section 922(a)(1) of Title 18 of the United States Code. In order for the defendant to be found guilty of that charge, the government must prove each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, the defendant was willfully engaged in the business of [dealing in] [importing]
[manufacturing] firearms within the dates specified in the indictment; and
Second, the defendant did not then have a license as a firearms [dealer] [importer] [manufacturer].
Comment
The government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant engaged in a greater degree of activity than the occasional sale of a hobbyist or collector, and that the defendant devoted time, attention and labor to selling firearms as a trade or business with the intent of making profits through the repeated purchase and sale of firearms. See United States v. King, 735 F.3d 1098, 1106 (9th Cir.2013) (citing Instruction 8.53). For a person to engage in the business of dealing in firearms, it is not necessary to prove an actual sale of firearms. Id. at 1107 n.8.
Willfully, as used in this statute, requires proof that the defendant knew that his or her conduct was unlawful, but does not require proof that the defendant knew of the federal licensing requirement. Bryan v. United States, 524 U.S. 184, 198-99 (1998).
Approved 2/2014
8.54 FIREARMS—SHIPMENT OR
TRANSPORTATION TO A PERSON NOT LICENSED
AS A DEALER, IMPORTER, MANUFACTURER OR COLLECTOR
(18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(2))
The defendant is charged in [Count _______ of] the indictment with the [shipment]
[transportation] of a firearm to a person not licensed as a [dealer] [importer] [manufacturer] [collector] of firearms, in violation of Section 922(a)(2) of Title 18 of the United States Code. In order for the defendant to be found guilty of that charge, the government must prove each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, the defendant was a licensed firearms [dealer] [importer] [manufacturer]
[collector];
Second, the defendant willfully [shipped] [transported] a [specify firearm] [[from one state to another] [between a foreign nation and the United States]]; and
Third, the defendant [shipped] [transported] the [specify firearm] to a person who was not licensed as a firearms [dealer] [importer] [manufacturer] [collector].
Comment
See Comment to Instruction 8.49 (False Impersonation of Citizen of United States).
While § 922(a)(2) also prohibits shipment or transportation of a firearm to a person not licensed as a firearms collector, a firearms collector’s license authorizes transactions only in curio and relic firearms. See 18 U.S.C. § 923(b); 27 C.F.R. §§ 478.41(c) and (d), 478.50 and 478.93. Moreover, the prohibition in § 922(a)(2) does not apply to returning a firearm or replacing a firearm of the same kind or type to a person from whom it was received. It also does not prohibit depositing a firearm for conveyance in the mails to any officer, employee, agent, or watchman who is authorized to receive such firearms for use in connection with that person’s official duty. See 18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(2)(A) and (B).
8.55 FIREARMS—TRANSPORTING OR
RECEIVING IN STATE OF RESIDENCE
(18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(3))
The defendant is charged in [Count _______ of] the indictment with [transporting]
[receiving] a firearm [into] [in] the state of his residence in violation of Section 922(a)(3) of Title 18 of the United States Code. In order for the defendant to be found guilty of that charge, the government must prove each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, the defendant was not licensed as a firearms [dealer] [importer] [manufacturer]
[collector]; and
Second, the defendant willfully [transported into] [received in] the state in which the defendant resided a [specify firearm] that the defendant purchased or otherwise obtained outside that state.
Comment
See Comment in 8.51 (Firearms) and Comment to Instruction 8.54 (Shipment or Transportation to a Person Not Licensed as a Dealer, Importer, Manufacturer or Collector). See also exceptions at 18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(3).
8.56 FIREARMS—UNLAWFUL
TRANSPORTATION OF DESTRUCTIVE DEVICE,
MACHINE GUN, SHORT–BARRELED SHOTGUN OR SHORT–BARRELED RIFLE
(18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(4))
The defendant is charged in [Count _______ of] the indictment with the unlawful transportation of a [destructive device] [machine gun] [short-barreled shotgun] [short-barreled rifle] in violation of Section 922(a)(4) of Title 18 of the United States Code. In order for the defendant to be found guilty of that charge, the government must prove each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, the defendant was not licensed as a firearms [dealer] [importer] [manufacturer]
[collector];
Second, the defendant knowingly transported a [specify destructive device or firearm]
[[from one state to another] [between a foreign nation and the United States]]; and
Third, that the defendant did so without specific authorization by the Attorney General of the United States.
Comment
See Comment in 8.51 (Firearms) and Comment to Instruction 8.54 (Shipment or
Transportation to a Person Not Licensed as a Dealer, Importer, Manufacturer or Collector).
The term “destructive device” is defined in 18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(4)(A)-(C) as:
(A) any explosive, incendiary, or poison gas (i) bomb, (ii) grenade, (iii) rocket having a propellant charge of more than four ounces, (iv) missile having an explosive or incendiary charge of more than one-quarter ounce, (v) mine, or (vi) device similar to any of the devices described in the preceding clauses; (B) any type of weapon (other than a shotgun or a shotgun shell which the Attorney General finds is generally recognized as particularly suitable for sporting purposes) by whatever name known which will, or which may be readily converted to, expel a projectile by the action of an explosive or other propellant, and which has any barrel with a bore of more than one-half inch in diameter; and (C) any combination of parts either designed or intended for use in converting any device into any destructive device described in subparagraph (A) or (B) and from which a destructive device may be readily assembled.
8.57 FIREARMS—UNLAWFUL DISPOSITION
BY UNLICENSED DEALER
(18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(5))
The defendant is charged in [Count _______ of] the indictment with the unlawful disposition of a firearm in violation of Section 922(a)(5) of Title 18 of the United States Code. In order for the defendant to be found guilty of that charge, the government must prove each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, the defendant willfully [sold] [traded] [gave] [transported] [delivered] [transferred] a [specify firearm] to [name of unlicensed dealer];
Second, neither the defendant nor [name of unlicensed dealer] was licensed as a firearm
[dealer] [importer] [manufacturer] [collector]; and
Third, the defendant knew or had reasonable cause to believe that [name of unlicensed dealer] was not a resident of the same state in which the defendant resided.
Comment
See Comment in 8.51 (Firearms) and Comment to Instruction 8.54 (Shipment or
Transportation to a Person Not Licensed as a Dealer, Importer, Manufacturer or Collector).
8.58 FIREARMS—FALSE STATEMENT OR
IDENTIFICATION IN ACQUISITION OR ATTEMPTED ACQUISITION
(18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(6))
The defendant is charged in [Count _______ of] the indictment with [making a false statement] [giving false identification] in [[acquiring] [attempting to acquire]] [specify firearm] in violation of Section 922(a)(6) of Title 18 of the United States Code. In order for the defendant to be found guilty of that charge, the government must prove each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, [specify seller] was a licensed firearms [dealer] [importer] [manufacturer]
[collector];
Second, in connection with [acquiring] [attempting to acquire] a [specify firearm] from
[specify seller], the defendant [made a false statement] [furnished or exhibited false identification];
Third, the defendant knew the [statement] [identification] was false; and
Fourth, the false [statement] [identification] was material; that is, the false [statement] [identification] had a natural tendency to influence, or was capable of influencing [specify seller] into believing that the [specify firearm] could be lawfully sold to the defendant.
Comment
As to the fourth element of this instruction, the identity of the “actual” buyer is material to the lawfulness of the sale of a firearm. A “straw” buyer’s false indication on ATF gun sales Form 4473 that he is the “actual” buyer is material, even if the true buyer was legally eligible to own the firearm. Abramski v. United States, 134 S. Ct. 2259, 2273 (2014).
Approved 2/2015
8.59 FIREARMS—UNLAWFUL SALE OR DELIVERY
(18 U.S.C. § 922(b)(1)–(3))
The defendant is charged in [Count _______ of] the indictment with unlawfully [selling]
[delivering] a firearm in violation of Section 922(b)[(1)][(2)][(3)] of Title 18 of the United States Code. In order for the defendant to be found guilty of that charge, the government must prove each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, the defendant was licensed as a firearms [dealer] [importer] [manufacturer]
[collector];
Second, the defendant willfully [[sold] [delivered]] [specify firearm] to [specify unauthorized purchaser]; and
Third, the defendant knew or had reasonable cause to believe that [[specify unauthorized purchaser] was less than eighteen years of age]] [[purchase or possession of the firearm by [specify unauthorized purchaser] would be in violation of [applicable state law or published ordinance]] [[specify unauthorized purchaser] did not reside in the same state in which the defendant’s place of business was located]].
Comment
See Comment in 8.51 (Firearms).
If ammunition is for or the firearm is a shotgun or rifle, it is unlawful to sell or deliver it to a person the licensee knows or has reason to believe is under 18; the minimum age is 21 if the ammunition is for or the firearm is a shotgun or rifle. 18 U.S.C. § 922(b)(1).
Section 922(b)(3) has been interpreted to mean that a dealer licensed in one state, who attends a gun show in another state, may display and possess guns, negotiate price, and receive money for guns as long as the transfer of the firearm is through a licensee of the state in which the gun show is located who fills out the appropriate forms. United States v. Ogles, 406 F.3d 586, 590 (9th Cir.2005), adopted by 440 F.3d 1095, 1099 (9th Cir.2006) (en banc).
8.60 FIREARMS—UNLAWFUL SALE OR DELIVERY WITHOUT SPECIFIC AUTHORITY
(18 U.S.C. § 922(b)(4))
The defendant is charged in [Count _______ of] the indictment with [selling] [delivering] a [destructive device] [machine gun] [short-barreled shotgun] [short-barreled rifle] without specific authority in violation of Section 922(b)(4) of Title 18 of the United States Code. In order for the defendant to be found guilty of that charge, the government must prove each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, the defendant was licensed as a firearms [dealer] [importer] [manufacturer] [collector];
Second, the defendant willfully [[sold] [delivered]] [specify destructive device or firearm] to [name of purchaser]; and
Third, the defendant did so without specific authorization by the Attorney General of the United States.
Comment
See Comment in 8.51 (Firearms).
The term “destructive device” is defined in 18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(4)(A)-(C) as:
(A) any explosive, incendiary, or poison gas (i) bomb, (ii) grenade, (iii) rocket having a propellant charge of more than four ounces, (iv) missile having an explosive or incendiary charge of more than one-quarter ounce, (v) mine, or (vi) device similar to any of the devices described in the preceding clauses; (B) any type of weapon (other than a shotgun or a shotgun shell which the Attorney General finds is generally recognized as particularly suitable for sporting purposes) by whatever name known which will, or which may be readily converted to, expel a projectile by the action of an explosive or other propellant, and which has any barrel with a bore of more than one-half inch in diameter; and (C) any combination of parts either designed or intended for use in converting any device into any destructive device described in subparagraph (A) or (B) and from which a destructive device may be readily assembled.
8.61 FIREARMS—UNLAWFUL SALE
(18 U.S.C. § 922(d))
The defendant is charged in [Count _______ of] the indictment with selling [a firearm] [ammunition] in violation of Section 922(d) of Title 18 of the United States Code. In order for the defendant to be found guilty of that charge, the government must prove each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, the defendant willfully sold [specify firearm] [specify ammunition] to [name of unauthorized purchaser]; and
Second, the defendant knew or had reasonable cause to believe that [name of unauthorized purchaser] was [specify applicable prohibited status from 18 U.S.C. § 922(d)(1)(9)].
Comment
See Comment in 8.51 (Firearms).
Section 922(d) makes it unlawful “to sell or otherwise dispose” of a firearm or ammunition. The instruction is written only in terms of a sale. If the facts are that the defendant “otherwise disposed” of the firearm or ammunition (for example, by gift or trade), the instruction should be modified accordingly.
Section 922(d)(1) makes it unlawful to sell or otherwise dispose of a firearm to a person who “is under indictment for, or has been convicted in any court of a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year.” The Committee recommends that the specific crime be stated in the instruction. Cf. Comment to Instruction 8.65A (Firearms—Unlawful Possession—Convicted Felon). Whether a particular crime is punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year is a matter of law.
For a definition of “fugitive from justice,” see Instruction 8.52 (Firearms—Fugitive From Justice Defined).
8.62 FIREARMS—DELIVERY TO CARRIER WITHOUT WRITTEN NOTICE
(18 U.S.C. § 922(e))
The defendant is charged in [Count _______ of] the indictment with delivery of a firearm to a carrier without written notice in violation of Section 922(e) of Title 18 of the United States Code. In order for the defendant to be found guilty of that charge, the government must prove each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, the defendant knowingly [delivered] [caused to be delivered] to [specify carrier] a package or other container in which there was [specify firearm] [specify ammunition];
Second, the package or container was to be [[shipped] [transported]] [[from one state to another] [between a foreign nation and the United States]];
Third, the package or container was to be [shipped] [transported] to a person who was not licensed as a firearms dealer, manufacturer, importer, or collector; and
Fourth, the defendant did not give written notice to [specify carrier] that there was [specify firearm] [specify ammunition] in the package or container.
Comment
See Comment in 8.51 (Firearms).
8.63 FIREARMS—UNLAWFUL RECEIPT
(18 U.S.C. § 922(g))
The defendant is charged in [Count _______ of] the indictment with receiving [a firearm] [ammunition] in violation of Section 922(g) of Title 18 of the United States Code. In order for the defendant to be found guilty of that charge, the government must prove each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, the defendant knowingly received [specify firearm] [specify ammunition];
Second, the [specify firearm] [specify ammunition] had been [[shipped] [transported]]
[[from one state to another] [between a foreign nation and the United States]]; and
Third, at the time the defendant received the [specify firearm] [specify ammunition], the defendant [specify applicable prohibited status from 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1)-(9)].
If a person knowingly takes possession of [a firearm] [ammunition], [he] [she] has “received” it.
Comment
See Comment in 8.51 (Firearms).
Under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) individuals falling into certain categories, such as fugitives from justice, are prohibited from receiving, shipping or transporting firearms or ammunition. This instruction covers receipt; for shipment or transportation, see Instruction 8.64 (Firearms—Unlawful Shipment or Transportation), and for possession, see Instruction 8.65 (Firearms—Unlawful Possession).
To establish “knowingly” under the first element, the government need not prove the defendant’s knowledge of the law, only “that the defendant consciously possessed [received, shipped, or transported] what he knew to be a firearm.” United States v. Beasley, 346 F.3d 930, 934 (2003). Moreover, a defendant prosecuted under § 922(g)(1) need not be aware that he or she is a felon or that the firearm or ammunition traveled in interstate commerce. United States v. Stone, 706 F.3d 1145, 1147 (9th Cir.2013)(defendant’s “knowledge of ammunition’s [or firearm’s] interstate connection is irrelevant”); United States v. Montero-Camargo, 177 F.3d 1118, 1120, amended on other grounds by 183 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir.1999) (“[K]nowledge of one’s felon status is not an element of the crime of being a felon in possession of a firearm or ammunition under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1)”); United States v. Miller, 105 F.3d 552, 555 (9th Cir.1997) (“We agree with the decisions from other circuits that the § 924(a) knowledge requirement applies only to the possession element of § 922(g)(1), not to the interstate nexus or to felon status”). See also United States v. Nevils, 598 F.3d 1158, 1168-70 (9th Cir.2010) (en banc) (finding sufficient evidence that sleeping defendant had knowing possession of firearms).
The third element refers to 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1)-(9), which sets forth nine categories of individuals prohibited from receiving, shipping, transporting, or possessing firearms and ammunition. Those categories are: (1) convicted felons; (2) fugitives from justice; (3) unlawful users and addicts of controlled substances defined in 21 U.S.C. § 802; (4) individuals who have been adjudicated as mentally ill or who have been committed to a mental institution; (5) aliens without authorization to be in the United States, and (subject to certain exceptions set forth at 18 U.S.C. § 922(y)(2)) aliens lawfully in the United States but with non-immigrant visas; (6) individuals who have been dishonorably discharged from the Armed Forces; (7) individuals who have renounced their citizenship; (8) individuals who have renounced their citizenship; (8) individuals who are subject to certain restraining orders issued after the individuals have been provided notice and opportunity to be heard and supported by specific factual findings that the individuals represent a credible threat to their intimate partners or children; and (9) individuals who have been convicted in any court of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence.
If the defendant is charged under § 922(g)(1) (convicted felon), the instruction should be modified if the defendant stipulates to the third element of the offense rather than have evidence of prior convictions presented to the jury. See Old Chief v. United States, 519 U.S. 172, 189 (1997) (reversible error to allow government to prove nature of prior conviction when defendant offers to stipulate to the prior conviction). If the defendant so stipulates, the third element should be modified as follows:
Third, at the time the defendant [received] [shipped] [transported] [possessed] the [specify firearm] [specify ammunition], the defendant had been convicted of a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year. The defendant stipulates that on [date], the defendant was convicted of a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year.
If the defendant does not stipulate to the third element, the following instruction should be given:
Third, at the time the defendant [received] [shipped] [transported] [possessed] the [specify firearm] [specify ammunition], the defendant had been convicted of [specify prior felony], which is a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year.
A conviction in a foreign court does not satisfy the element of prior conviction under § 922(g)(1). Small v. United States, 544 U.S. 385, 387 (2005).
For a definition of “fugitive from justice” as used in § 922(g)(2), see Instruction 8.52 (Firearms—Fugitive From Justice Defined).
Despite some indication in the case law that aliens who have been released on bail pending deportation or pending a removal hearing, but who have filed applications to legalize their immigration status, are not subject to the prohibition of § 922(g)(5), such a conclusion is incorrect under current versions of removability statutes. See United States v. Latu, 479 F.3d 1153, 1158 (9th Cir.2007).
The term “misdemeanor crime of domestic violence” used in § 922(g)(9) is separately defined in § 921(a)(33)(A). The Supreme Court has interpreted that definition to include two requirements: first, the crime must have as an element “the use or attempted use of physical force, or the threatened use of a deadly weapon,” and second, the victim of the offense must have been in a specified domestic relationship with the defendant. United States v. Hayes, 555 U.S. 415, 421 (2009). The first requirement, the use or attempted use of force, or threatened use of a deadly weapon, must be an element of the underlying offense. Id. Conversely, the second requirement, the domestic relationship, need not be an element of the underlying offense. A conviction under a statute that does not require a domestic relationship may thus be a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence if the government proves that the “prior conviction was, in fact, for an offense . . . committed by the defendant against a spouse or other domestic victim.” Id. (internal quotation marks omitted).
In determining whether a statute has as an element the “use . . . of physical force” for purposes of § 922(g)(9), the Supreme Court has held that “Congress incorporated the commonlaw meaning of ‘force’—namely, offensive touching—in § 921(a)(33)(A)’s definition of a
‘misdemeanor crime of domestic violence.’” United States v. Castleman, 134 S. Ct. 1405, 1410 (2014). Accordingly, the statute under which the defendant is convicted need not prohibit violent force, so long as it prohibits “the degree of force that supports a common-law battery conviction.” Id. at 1413; see id. at 1413–14 (holding that Tennessee statute prohibiting “intentionally or knowingly caus[ing] bodily injury” to family or household member necessarily has as element use of physical force in common-law sense).
Approved 6/2014
8.64 FIREARMS—UNLAWFUL SHIPMENT
OR TRANSPORTATION
(18 U.S.C. § 922(g))
The defendant is charged in [Count _______ of] the indictment with [[shipping]
[transporting]] [[a firearm] [ammunition]] in violation of Section 922(g) of Title 18 of the United States Code. In order for the defendant to be found guilty of that charge, the government must prove each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
First, the defendant knowingly [[shipped] [transported]] [[specify firearm] [specify ammunition]] [[from one state to another] [between a foreign nation and the United States]]; and
Second, at the time of [shipment] [transportation] the defendant was [specify applicable prohibited status from 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1)-(9)].
Comment
See Comment in 8.51 (Firearms).
For a discussion of “knowingly” and of the nine categories of prohibited status set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1)-(9), see Comment to Instruction 8.63 (Firearms—Unlawful Receipt).
- That process in due form of law, according to the practices of this Honorable Court in causes of admirality and maritime jurisprudence, April issue agains the stem ship, her enginces, tacke appearl. Etc. and that all person having or claiming any interest therein be citized to apper and answer under oath, all and singular the matters aforesaid; that Plaitniff have a deree for its damaged aforesaid, with interest and cost; and that the steamship__________be condemned and sld to stisfy plaintiff decree;
- That process in due form of law April issue against B citing it to appear and answer, under oath, all and singular, the matters aforesaid;
- That the Court order, adjudge and decree that Plaitnifff have a decree against B for claim asserted gy plaintiff herein tooether with interest and costs and
That Plaintiff have such other and further relief as April be proper and that this Court s compettnet ot grnt. ) Writs in the nature of Quo Warranto served without delay upon Loretta Lynch
and/or et al’s. case #of the USDC in Cheyenne, Wyoming, USA;
(2) Orders dismissing with prejudice the “any” alleged “indictment” an “superseding indictment”
and the criminal case as to QUI TAM RELATOR; see all MOTIONs
TO DISMISS and all SUPPLEMENTs in the USDC/DWY Docket records;
(3) Order releasing QUI TAM RELATOR to unfettered liberty without any further delays; see 28
U.S.C. 2242;
(4) Order appointing a competent and qualified CJA lawyer to prosecute indigent QUI TAM
QUI TAM RELATOR’s several cross-complaints as previously filed in the USDC/DWY Docket records
supra; see 18 U.S.C. 1964, 42 U.S.C. 1985 and 1986;
(5) Referral of the entire USDC/DWY Docket records supra to a lawfully convened Federal Grand Jury
within the District Court of Columbia , and supervised by this Court;
(6) Appoint Special Prosecutors
(7) Partial payment of ten thousand U.S. Dollars ($10,000 USD)
to commence QUI TAM RELATOR’s rehabilitation i.e. food, shelter, clothing,
payable by the Office of the United States Attorney General and/or U.S. Attorney, District of Wyoming,
to the client trust account of the CJA lawyer duly appointed by this honorable Court;
9) any and all other relief which this Court deems just and proper under the several circumstances which
have occasioned the instant INITIAL APPLICATION e.g. Habeas Corpus relief, relief from
retaliatory actions, triple damages etc.
order to show cause Barak H. Obama
That Plaintiff have such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, under the full range of relevant circumstances which have occasioned the instant action. For “DEFAULT” JUDGMENT AND/OR Judgment WRIT OF ATTACHMENT in the amount of Plaitniffs damages, tighter with interest thereon form the rrespective dates due, cost, disbursements, and reasonable attorney fees.
- That process in due form of law according to the practice of this court in cases of admirality and maritime jurisdiction April issue against the Defendant cititng it to apprear and answer all the matters described in this complaint.Plaintiff have such other and further relief in the premises as in law and justice in April be entitled to receive.
SCHEDULE[DESIGNATION OF SCHEDULE]
- Defendant’s Status and addresss:
- A. Unpon information and belief and at all times hereinafter mentioned, Defendant Barak H. Obama(AKA Barry Soertoes) class representative was a [type of legaly entity]authorized under the laws of the United States Constition, with offices and a place of business at [Obama address]
DETAILS OF THE _________(S)
- Bill of Lading No.{ number of bill} dated {dated of bill of lading – 1993 thru present] from [name of citiy], [name of county] to [name of city], [name of state] on the vessel [name of vessel], [one(1) container SAID TO CONTAIN: [description of contents], at the applicable tariff charge of $____________dollar amount of ttarriff charge EXhits { of exhibit}
Amount Paid: ______ Amount Due:____________
Sworn to and subscribed before me this _______ day of _____________________, 2015
________________________________
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/biden-struggles-party-democrats-2024-poll/story?id=90427262
OVERT ACT(S)!!
NATIONAL EMERGENCY!! NOT FAKE NEWS! CHRISTIAN PERSECUTION IN AMERICA HAS BEGUN!! THE IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCMENT(ICE) AGENCY ARE ACTING IN JOINT PARTICIPATION WITH DONALD TRUMP, BONDI, the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) TO MAKE INDISCRIMINATORY ARREST, FORCE CHRISTIANS INTO FEMA EXTERMINATION DEATH CAMPS FOR "BEHEADINGS," FOR ALL WHO DO NOT WORSHIP SATAN AND RECEIVE BILL GATES(MICROSOFT'S) "OFFICIAL MARK OF THE BEAST - PERMANENT EMBEDDED TATTOO IN THE SKIN-REPLACEMENT OF OUR CELL PHONES," TAKING PLACE UNDER THE GUISE OF DONALD TRUMP "IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT." ICE IS "DISSOLVED VIA COURT ORDER OF THIS LAWFUL ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME COURT!" ALL ICE AGENT AJUDICATED GUILTY FOR GENOCIDE, CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY ETC. & PROPERTY HAS BEEN FORFEITED AND DEATH WARRANTS ISSUED FOR THEIR CONSPIRACY WITH ISIS "LITERALLY!!" DOMESTIC TERRORIST OPERATING IN JOINT PARTICIPATION WITH ALIEN FOREIGN ENEMY TERRORIST ON U.S. SOIL!! THE U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT(ICE), DONALD TRUMP, JAMES D. VANCE AND OTHER PUBLIC OFFICIALS CONCEAL KNOWN FACTS THEY ARE UNDER A DUTY TO DISCLOSE TO U.S. CITIZENS AND IS ACTING IN JOINT PARTICIPATION WITH the "Satanic" Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) AND OTHER "MIDDLE EASTERN" TERRORIST TO USE FORCE, COERCION ENSLAVE U.S. CITIZENS(AND/OR HUMANITY) WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW, FORCE WORSHIP OF SATAN AND BEHEAD ALL CHRISTIANS(AND OTHER RELIGIONOUS GROUP INCLUDING ISLAM, BUDDIST, HINDUS ETC.)[SEE THE HOLY BIBILE Revelation 20:4 KVJ], FOR ALL WHO DO NOT RECEIVE BILL GATES PERMANENT NON-REMOVAL TATTOO IMBEDDED UNDER THE SKIN- REPLACEMENT OF OUR CELL PHONES- THE OFFICIAL MARK OF THE BEAST(REVELATION 13:11-18) AT THE LAST TRUMP(1 Corinthians 15:52-THE HOLY BIBLE)!! AMERICA "AS WE KNOW IT" ENDS ON ITS 250 BIRTHDAY(THIS YEAR) "LITERALLY!!" 