“A RESEARCHER TESTIFY ABOUT THE COV-19 BIOWEAPON AS FOLLOWS”

(HUNDREDS AND/OR THOUSANDS OF LAWYERS AND/OR DOCTORS HAVE STARTED CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE PERPETRATORS FOR “BILLIONS” OF VIOLATIONS OF THE NUREMBERG CODE FOR EXPERIMENTAL COVID INJECTION “DEATH” JAB THAT: 1)CHANGE MEN AND WOMEN DNA AND/OR GENES, 2)PATENT MEN AND WOMEN FOR ENSLAVMENT AND “GLOBAL ELITE” OWNERSHIP, 3) THAT CONCEALED KNOWN FACTS FROM HUMANITY” AND THE TWO WITNESSES THEY WERE UNDER A DUTY TO DISCLOSE PUT DEFENSE ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECT AGENCY(DARPHA) BIOWEAPON HYDROGELS NANO TECHNOLOGIES AND/OR IMPLANTABLE NANOTECHNOLOGY IN “THE TWO WITNESSES AND/OR HUMANITY” VIA THE “RAZORBLADE COVID-19 INJECTION DEATH JAB(SEE THIS WEBSITE)” WITH FRAUD, FORCE AND/OR COERCION WITHOUT THE CONSENT AND WHICH HAVE KILLED MILLIONS(AND WILL KILL BILLIONS IN THE FUTURE)INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO BABY FORMULAS ,BUT HAVE BEEN UNSUCCESSFUL TO IM https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuremberg_CodeAND ATTEMPTED TO FOR INSTANCE DR. ROBERT FUELLMICH, AND COUNTLESS OTHERS HAVE STARTED CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE “INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL RACKET” BUT ARE UNABLE TO JUDGE AND/OR SENTENCE(AND/OR “JAIL”) THE PERPATRATORS BECAUSE THEY LACK STANDING – SEE BELOW FOR DEFINTION OF STANDING )VIA THE RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATION ACT AND ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME LAW COMMON LAW (SEE BELOW)

COMES NOW “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWAER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR [WITH ARREST WARRANTS, ADJUDICATION DECLARATORY JUDGMENT ENTITLED “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR REALTOR VS. MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS “DEFACTO” OFFICIAL CAPACITY AND/OR INDIVIDUALLYAND/OR JUDGMENT, SENTENCE OF MERRICK GARLAND -SEE BELOW) AND ALSO ADJUDIFICATION & DECLARE THAT ALL SPECIAL PROSECUTORS, AND OTHER APPOINTMENTS BY MERRICK GARLAND AS ATTORNEY GENERAL INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, JACK SMITH, COLONEL CLEMENTS[AND/OR ALL STATE,

golocalprov-_-u.s.-attorney-general-garland-announces-colonel-clements-appointment Download

(on this same day I posted the above – Garland attempts to cover up – FRAUD AS FOLLOWS:

https://www.pbs.org/weta/washingtonweek/video/2023/01/how-ag-garland-is-expanding-dojs-civil-rights-footprint

https://www.businessinsider.com/biden-aides-surprised-garland-appointed-special-counsel-report-2023-1

LOCAL ETC. U.S. LAW ENFORCMENT OFFICERS OPERATING UNDER GARLAND AND/OR CLEMENTS “AKA all U.S. D.O.J. EMPLOYEES AND/OR ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS employed by the U.S. Government” ET AL ,

and

ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT JUDGES

all Appellant Court Judges, District Court Judges, State Court Judges, Administrative Court Judges “AKA all U.S. Judges employed by the U.S. Government” Administrative Court Judges unlawfully, illegally employed by or associated with “COV-19 INJECTION” – BIO-TERROR, BIOLOGICAL WARFARE ENTERPRISE engaged in, or the activities affect, interstate or foreign commerce, and all conduct or participate, directly or indirectly, in the conduct of such enterprise’s affairs through a pattern of racketeering activity or collection of unlawful debt and/or conspired to violate

(d)

It shall be unlawful for any person to conspire to violate any of the provisions of subsection (a), (b), or (c) of this section, AND “THE 50 STATES EX RES SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RESLOTR THE TWO WITNESSES BOTH SHARON AND/OR JAEMS S. BRIDGEWATER HAV

SENTENCE OF MERRICK GARLAND -SEE BELOW) AND ALSO DECLARE THAT ALL SPECIAL PROSECUTORS, AND OTHER APPOINTMENTS BY MERRICK GARLAND AS ATTORNEY GENERAL INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, JACK SMITH, ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, ALL U.S. APPEALLANT COURT JUDGES, ALL FEDERAL, STAT employed by or associated with any enterprise engaged in, or the activities of which affect, interstate or foreign commerce, to conduct or participate, directly or indirectly, in the conduct of such enterprise’s affairs through a pattern of racketeering activity or collection of unlawful debt.

(d)

It shall be unlawful for any person to conspire to violate any of the provisions of subsection (a), (b), or (c) of this section.

ARE JUDGMENTS, SHADOW ORDERS, WRITS, ETC. court settlements for example:

MONSANTO SETTLEMENTS Exposure to the herbicide Roundup (glyphosate)

FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT ARE NULL AND VOID AND WITHOUT ANY LEGAL EFFECT!!

ARE NULL AND VOID AND WITHOUT ANY LEGAL EFFECT

IN ADDITION TO THE ABOVE & THE TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION SENT ON JAN. 6, 2023

(ANNIVERSITY OF U.S. CAPITOL ATTACKS

BIDEN, c-mail Download

IN ADDITION TO THE TRO/ PRENOTICE & AFFIDAVIT OF “THE 50 STATES” EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR AMENDED TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION(ADDING ADDITIONAL DEFENDANTS & ENJOINING RESTRAIN CO-CONSPIRATORS JACOB ROTHCHILD ROTHCHILD[OWNER AND CONTROLLER OF MOST IF NOT ALL WORLD BANKS- & WITH ARREST WARRANTS, ADJUDICATION AND/OR JUDGMENT, SENTENCE OF ROTHCHILD et al SEE BELOW],

CHINA’S XI JINPING[WITH ARREST WARRANTS, ADJUDICATION AND/OR JUDGMENT, SENTENCE OF XI JINPING -SEE BELOW],

FROM ENGAGING IN A PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY, FROM DEFRAUDING THE U.S.A. IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 371, AND FROM CONTINUING TO DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES[FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO 2008 AND FURTHER CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT] VIOLATIONS OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY(AND/OR THE TWO WITNESSES), VIOLATIONS OF THE NUREMBERG CODE(THE PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS IS “DEATH”)

WHICH INCLUDES EXECUTIONS BY ONE OR MORE FIRING SQUAD, ELECTROCUTION, POISONOUS GAS CHAMBER AS THE FOLLOWS:

new-doj-rules-could-allow-firing-squads-electrocution-poisonous-gas-for-executions-_-fox-news Download

VIA THE COVID-19 MILITARY GRADE(“Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency[DARPHA]) BIOLOGICAL WARFARE INFECTIOUS DISEASE BIOTERROR INJECTION CONTAINING “LUCIFER” “RACE” – LUCIFERASE DNA ALTERING NANOTECH BRAIN CONTROLLING INJECTION”KNOWINGLY, INTENTIONALLY, PURPOSEFULLY UNLEASHED ON FIVE[5.5] BILLION PEOPLE(“AND COUNTING SEE BELOW) VIA CERTIFIED MAIL TO JACOB ROTHCHILD, XI JINPING, EUROPEAN UNION PRESIDENT(E.U.), DONALD TRUMP[WITH ARREST WARRANTS, ADJUDICATION AND/OR JUDGMENT, SENTENCE OF TRUMP – SEE BELOW],

THE POPE – VATICAN IN ADDITION TO THE TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER/PERMANENT INJUNCTION SENT VIA CERTIFIED MAIL TO BIDEN, HARRIS, GARLAND AND CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS ON JAN. 6, 2023 – CLICK HERE

January 25, 2021 TRUMP IMPEACHED

ON JSN. BIDEN GRANT CHINA U.S. SOVEREIGNTY ON HIS FIRST DAY OF OFFICE & IS BIDEN IMPEACHMENT(1/21/2021 IST DAY IN OFFICE) JOINDER OF PARTIES AND/OR CONSOLIDATION OF CASES IN MPEACHMENT”UNDER SEAL” FRAUD!!

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/former-trump-defense-attorney-on-why-the-impeachment-trial-is-unconstitutional

IN FURTHERNCE OF THE CONSPIRACY PEOL

KAMAL HARRIS “FASLELY” SWEARING GARALND IN AS U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL

(IN ADDITION TO THE ABOVE K. HARRIS TERROR VISIT, ON 1-12-2023, ON THIS SAME DAY CO-CONSPIRATORS, GARLAND, BIDEN, TRUMP ET AL CONCOCT A

BIDEN, TRUMP, GARLAND, ILLEGALLY, UNLAWFULLY, WITHOUT THE AUTHORITY, “SHAM” APPO

https://news.yahoo.com/garland-appoints-robert-hur-as-special-counsel-to-oversee-biden-classified-docs-probe-184113576.html

NOTICE AND AJUDIFICATION DECLARATORY JUDGMENT “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GE

AND BELOW], IN ADDITION TO A “SHAM” HUNTER BIDEN AND BIDEN’S DOCS INVESTIGATION, moves or travels in interstate or foreign commerce with intent to one or more avoid prosecution, or custody or confinement and/or conviction, under the laws of the U.S. via the Racketeered Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act and/or Admiralty and Maritime law[“THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR”] punishable by death IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S. Code § 1073

https://nypost.com/2023/01/12/wh-admits-more-classified-docs-found-in-bidens-delaware-garage/

NOTICE AND AJUDIFICATION DECLARATORY JUDGMENT “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL RETROACTIVE APPOINTMENT OF PRESIDENT[FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT] OF THE 50 STATES UNITED STATES AND/OR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA VIA ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME LAW AND/OR THE RACKETEERED INFLUENCED(CLICK HERE) ADJUDIFICATION THAT ALL U.S. PRESIDENTS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESIDENT IS NULL AND VOID AND WITHOUT ANY LEGAL EFFECT, ALL ILLEGALLY, UNLAWFULLY CONCEALED KNOWN DECLARATORY JUDGMENT(SEE THIS WEBSITE)

BIDEN, TRUMP, GARLAND, ILLEGALLY, UNLAWFULLY, WITHOUT THE AUTHORITY, “SHAM” APPO

https://news.yahoo.com/garland-appoints-robert-hur-as-special-counsel-to-oversee-biden-classified-docs-probe-184113576.html

JAN. 12, 2023

MERRICK GARLAND[WITH ARREST WARRANTS, ADJUDICATION AND/OR JUDGMENT, SENTENCE OF MERRICK GARLAND – SEE BELOW DECLARATORY JUDGMENT ENTITLED “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR REALTOR VS. MERRICK GARLAND], NAMES TRUMP’S Robert K. Hur(ASIAN AMERICAN),

who will take over the investigation, was Maryland’s top federal prosecutor for almost three years, between April 2018 and February 2021, and was appointed by President Donald Trump.(SPECIAL AS PROSECUTOR – WITH ARREST WARRANTS, ADJUDICATION AND/OR JUDGMENT, SENTENCE FOR ROBERT K. HUR) WITHOUT LAWFUL AUTHORITY

https://www.cnn.com/2023/01/12/politics/joe-biden-classified-documents-counsels-office/index.html

HIRES TRUMP’S CO-CONSPIRATOR Robert K. Hur(ASIAN AMERICAN), who will take over the investigation, was Maryland’s top federal prosecutor for almost three years, between April 2018 and February 2021, and was appointed by President Donald Trump.

https://apnews.com/article/biden-classified-documents-updates-e506a5c4094356cf4c7d11f8fb3d23b4

https://www.cnn.com/2022/08/08/politics/mar-a-lago-search-warrant-fbi-donald-trump/index.html

SHAM BIDEN[WITH ARREST WARRANTS, ADJUDICATION AND/OR JUDGMENT, SENTENCE JOE BIDEN – FOR KNOWINGLY, INTENTIONALLY, CONSPIRING WITH “GLOBAL ELITE CRIMINALS” CONCEALING FROM THE TWO WITNESSES AND U.S. CITIZENS, HE WAS UNDER A DUTY TO DISCLOSE – ISSUING ONE OR MORE EXECUTIVE ORDERS 1)”MAKING U.S. CITIZENS(AND/OR THE TWO WITNESSES) TRANSHUMANS WITHOUT KNOWLEDGE OR CONSENT, 2) GRANTING CHINA’S XI JINPING(AND/OR THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION PRESIDENT A MARXIST TERROR) SOVERIGNTY OVER THE TWO WITNESS, U.S. CITIZENS AND/OR THE U.S. ON HIS FIRST DAY AS “DEFACTO” PRESIDENT OF THE U.S. BASED ON “FRAUD & DECEIT,” 3) FOR ISSUING EXECUTIVE ORDER # 14067 “DIGITAL ASSETS,” TO DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES AND U.S. CITIZENS OUT OF ALL MONEY AND PROPERTY IN THE BANK, VIOLATIONS OF THE NUREMBERG CODE VIA THE “MANDATING” THE COVID/DNA ALTERING-NANO TECH INJECTION

GERMAN PRIMARY CO-CONSPIRATOR STATES THAT THE COV-19 INJECTION CHANGES WHO YOU ARE AND IN ADDITION HIS CO-CONSPIRATOR STATE PEOPLE ARE HACKABLE ANIMALS AS FOLLOWS IN THE ABOVE VIDEO

ALL ARE AIDING, ABETTING CHINA AND RUSSIA TO CONSOLIDATE THE U.S. WITH CHINA AND INTO A COMMUNIST COUNTRY(NO MORE U.S. CONSTUTIONAL RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS)

ALL PUBLIC U.S. GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS are unlawfully, illegally defined as persons employed by or associated with a biological warfare enterprise engaged in, or the activities of which affect, interstate or foreign commerce, to conduct or participate, directly or indirectly, in the conduct of such enterprise’s affairs through a pattern of racketeering activity or collection of unlawful debt. DOMESTIC ARE REPSONSIBLE FOR Treason against the United States, levying War against the U.S., the two witnesses, or in adhering to China and/or Russia by giving them Aid and Comfort(Granting China sovereignty of the U.S.

NOTICE OF “COMMON LAW CONVENTION OF THE 50 STATES” AND NOTICE OF ADDITIONAL AMENDMENT(28TH) TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION AND Universal Declaration of Human Rights TO INCLUDE NEURORIGHTS protecting the brain and its activity as neurotechnology advances.

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨

over the U.S. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court. THE COVID-19 INJECTION, CONSPIR – NANOTECH – JAN. 6, 2021 CAPITOL ATTACKS!!

IN FURTHERNCE OF THE CONSPIRACY PEOL

NOTICE AND AFFIDIVANT OF RETROACTIVE INTERVENTION PURSUANT TO FRCP 24(A)- (SEE BELOW), NOTICE OF ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME CLAIMS[RETROACTIVE FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT), NOTICE OF PUBLICATION OF INTERNATIONAL FORFEITURE(ASSETS LOCATED ABROAD UNDER U.S. LAW AND/OR Forfeiture of Assets Located in the United States under Foreign Law)FORFEITURE OF ALL TANGIBLE AND INTANGLE PROPERTY PUBLICATION & “COMMON LAW”

orderofpublication Download

PUBLIC NOTICE OF OPEN COURT HEARING AND/OR TRIAL[RETROACTIVE FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT] VIA ADMIRALITY AND MARITIME “COMMON LAW” REMEDIES AND THE RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATION ACT(RICO)

https://www.mlive.com/news/ann-arbor/2023/01/ann-arbor-embraces-kamala-harris-climate-call-at-university-of-michigan.html

NOTICE OF FORFEITURE OF
PROPERTY PURSUANT TO
“THE RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATION ACT” & ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME CLAIM – SUPPLIMENTAL RULE G – FORFEITURE ACTION IN REM(“RETROACTIVE FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT & THE “50 STATES” EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR GIVES ALL DEFENDANTS NOTICE PURSUANT TO 18 USC SECTION 1963D

AND SUMMARY ADJUDIFICATION OF FORFEITURE BY A LAWFUL JUDGE SEE BELOW:

(The property is within the District of Columbia and/or other districts or will be during the pendency of the action). All Writs Act is a United States federal statute, codified at 28 U.S.C. § 1651, which authorizes the United States federal courts to “issue all writs necessary or appropriate in aid of their respective jurisdictions and agreeable to the usages and principles of law, pursuant to Admiralty and Maritime Common law and the Racketeered influenced and Corrupt Organization act, which includes one or more WRIT OF EXECUTION, WRIT OF ENTRY, LIST

On February 8, 2012, CBP published in the Federal Register (77 FR 6527) a proposed rule to amend title 19 of the Code of Federal Regulations (19 CFR) regarding the manner by which CBP provides notice of intent to forfeit seized property appraised at more than $5,000 and seized property appraised at $5,000 or less. CBP proposed to utilize the Department of Justice (DOJ) forfeiture Web site, located at www.forfeiture.gov,, to post seizure and forfeiture notices for property appraised in excess of $5,000 in value for 30 consecutive days, including seizures by the U.S. Border Patrol, where appropriate. This internet

private-attorney-generalforfeiture Download

(1)The following property is subject to forfeiture to “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR INCLUDES BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO ALL “GLOBAL BANKS, ” THE U.S. FEDERAL RESERVE, THE INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND, ETC. FOR ROTHCHILD AND CO-CONSPIRATORS transaction or attempted transaction in violation of section 1956, 1957 or 1960 traceable to such property. All property, real or personal, within the jurisdiction of the United States and/or Internationally, constituting, derived from, or traceable to, a proceeds obtained directly or indirectly from an offense committed in joint participation with “foreign nations and/or head of state,” and property used to facilitate the offenses which involves trafficking in nuclear, chemical, biological, or radiological weaponsconduct described in section 1956(c)(7)(B);punishable within the jurisdiction of the foreign nation and/or the U.S. by death or imprisonment for a term exceeding 1 year; and punishable under the laws of the United States by imprisonment for a term exceeding 1 year, for offenses occurred within the jurisdiction of the United States. in addition all property, real or personal, derived from proceeds traceable to a violation ofsection 215, 471, 472, 473, 474, 476, 477, 478, 479, 480, 481, 485, 486, 487, 488, 501, 502, 510, 542, 545, 656, 657, 670, 842, 844, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1014, 1028, 1029, 1030, 1032, or 1344 of offense constituting “specified unlawful activity” (as defined in section 1956(c)(7) of this title), or a conspiracy to commit such offense. Even further, all r property, real or personal, traceable to the gross receipts obtained, directly or indirectly, from a violation of—section 666(a)(1) (relating to Federal program fraud); section 1001 (relating to fraud and false statements); section 1031 (relating to major fraud against the United States); section 1032 (relating to concealment of assets from conservator or receiver of insured financial institution); section 1341 (relating to mail fraud); or section 1343 (relating to wire fraud),for violations which relates to the sale of assets acquired or held by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as conservator or receiver for a financial institution, or any other conservator for a financial institution appointed by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency or the National Credit Union Administration, as conservator or liquidating agent for a financial institution. Continuing even further, respect to an offense listed in subsection (a)(1)(D) committed for the purpose of executing or attempting to execute any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent statements, pretenses, representations or promises, the gross receipts of such an offense shall include all property, real or personal, tangible or intangible, which thereby is obtained, directly or indirectly allproperty, real or personal, which represents or is traceable to the gross proceeds obtained, directly or indirectly, from a violation of the “”COVID-19 BIOLOGICAL WARFARE DOMESTIC AND INTERNATIONAL TERRRORIST ENTERPRIZE” which consist of many individuals, entities, or organization engaged in planning or perpetrating any any ¹ Federal crime of terrorism (as defined in section 2332b(g)(5)) against the United States, citizens(the two witnesses both Sharon Bridgewater and/or James S. Bridgewater) or residents of the United States, or their property, and all assets, foreign or domestic, affording any person a source of influence over any such entity or organization; acquired or maintained by any person with the intent and for the purpose of supporting, planning, conducting, or concealing any Federal crime of terrorism (as defined in section 2332b(g)(5) [2] against the United States, citizens or residents of the United States, or their property; derived from, involved in, or used or intended to be used to commit any Federal crime of terrorism (as defined in section 2332b(g)(5)) against the United States, citizens or residents of the United States, or their property; or of any individual, entity, or organization engaged in planning or perpetrating any act of international terrorism (as defined in section 2331) against any international organization (as defined in section 209 of the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 (22 U.S.C. 4309(b)) or against any foreign Government.[3] Where the property sought for forfeiture is located beyond the territorial boundaries of the United States, an act in furtherance of such planning or perpetration must have occurred within the jurisdiction of the United States Any property, real or personal, involved in a violation or attempted violation, or which constitutes or is derived from proceeds traceable to a violation, of section 2339C of this title. Any property, real or personal, that is involved in a violation or attempted violation, or which constitutes or is derived from proceeds traceable to a prohibition imposed pursuant to section 104(a) of the North Korea Sanctions and Policy Enhancement Act of 2016.

ONLINE PUBLICATION OF FORFEITURE as provided in:

NOTICE TO ALL DEFENDANTS – NO RIGHT TO JURY TRIAL – SEE 32.2(E)

Rule 32.2(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure; or
28 CFR Part 8.9, Rule G of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions.

AND SUMMARY ADJUDIFICATION OF FORFEITURE BY A LAWFUL JUDGE SEE BELOW:

(The property is within the District of Columbia and/or other districts or will be during the pendency of the action).

rule-32.2-criminal-forfeiture-_-federal-rules-of-criminal-procedure-_-lii-_-legal-information-institute Download

(WHICH AUTHORIZES & PERMITS “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR – ONE OF TWO VICTIMS[AND WITNESSES], INJURED AND DAMAGED IN BUSINESS, PERSON OR PROPERTY AND RESTRAINED FROM INTERSTATE AND FOREIGN FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUNING THRU TO PRESENT BY ONE OR MORE JACOB ROTHCHILD(OWNER AND CONTROLLER OF MOST IF NOT ALL “GLOBAL CENTRAL BANKS, ” U.K.’S Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, “European Union President Ursula von der Leyen, Anthony Fauci, former Chief Medical Advisor to Donald Trump and/or Joe Biden, Klaus Schwab Founder and Executive Chairman of the World Economic Forum, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus Director general of the World Health Organization (AND PREDECESSORS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT,

ADDITIONAL DEFENDANTS

TRO, PERMANENT INJUNCTION OF GARLAND, TRUMP, BIDEN RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY VIA (SEE BELOW CERTIFIED LETTER SENT TO MERRICK GARLAND, SMITH AND ROBERT HUR “FAKE, SHAM PROSECUTION”(SEE

https://apnews.com/article/biden-classified-documents-updates-e506a5c4094356cf4c7d11f8fb3d23b4

https://www.cnn.com/2022/08/08/politics/mar-a-lago-search-warrant-fbi-donald-trump/index.html

COMES NOW TO TWO WITNESSES[“RETROACTIVE FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT] gives this “TESTIMONY” AND/OR CONFESSION IN OPEN COURT ADJUDICATES, CONVICTS, JUDGE, “RETROACTIVELY FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUNG THRU TO PRESENT]SENTENCE JOE BIDEN{and predecessor from Jan. 1, 1993 and continuing thru to his term and/or those operating under his direction including but not limited to MERRICK GARLAND, DONALD TRUMP, KAMALA HARRIS, U.S. Representatives, Congressman and women, all U.S. Supreme Court Justices, MAJOR TECH. CORPORATIONS(OFFICERS, PRESIDENTS, ETC.) JACOB ROTHCHILD(“OWNER AND CONTROLLER” OF U.S. FEDERAL RESERVE, AND MOST IF NOT ALL GLOBAL CENTRAL BANKS ET AL FOR TREASON, levying War against the two witnesses, THE U.S.A., citizens of the U.S., and adhering to the enemies of the U.S. [one or more foreign official acting on behalf of Russia, China, Germany etc.] their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort within the United States of America.(all are guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.) Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court. REBELLION AND INSURRECTION knowingly, intentionally, incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection in violation of 18 U.S. Code § 2383 and against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto( shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States)

VIOLATIONS OF 18 USC SECTION(S)1956, 1957, or 1960 of conspiracy to violate one or more section 215, 656, 657, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1014,1341, 1343, or 1344 of this title, affecting a financial
institution, or 18 usc section 471, 472, 473, 474, 476, 477, 478, 479, 480,
481, 485, 486, 487, 488, 501, 502, 510, 542, 545, 555, 842,
844, 1028, 1029, or 1030, one or more 18 u.s.c. section 666(a)(1) (relating to Federal program
fraud); 18 usc section 1001 (relating to fraud and false statements); 18 usc section section 1031 (relating to major fraud against the United States); 18 u.s.c. section 1032 (relating to concealment of assets; 18 usc section 1341 (relating to mail fraud); or 18 u.s.c. section 1343 (relating to wire fraud),
involving the sale of assets acquired or held by the
the [FN1] Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as
conservator or receiver for a financial institution or any
other conservator for a financial institution appointed
by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, or the
National Credit Union Administration, as conservator or
liquidating agent for a financial institution, shall order
that the person forfeit to the United States any property,
real or personal, which represents or is traceable to the
gross receipts obtained, directly or indirectly, as a result
of such violation.
(4) With respect to an offense listed in subsection (a)(3)
committed for the purpose of executing or attempting to
execute any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining
money or property by means of false or fraudulent statements,
pretenses, representations, or promises, the gross receipts of
such an offense shall include any property, real or personal,
tangible or intangible, which is obtained, directly or indirectly,
as a result of such offense.
(5) The court, in imposing sentence on a person convicted
of a violation or conspiracy to violate—

(C) section 2119 (armed robbery of automobiles);
(D) section 2312 (transporting stolen motor vehicles in
interstate commerce); or
(E) section 2313 (possessing or selling a stolen motor
vehicle that has moved in interstate commerce);
shall order that the person forfeit to the United States
any property, real or personal, which represents or is
traceable to the gross proceeds obtained, directly or
indirectly, as a result of such violation.
(6)(A) The court, in imposing sentence on a person
convicted of a violation of, or conspiracy to violate, section
274(a), 274A(a)(1), or 274A(a)(2) of the Immigration and
Nationality Act or section 555, 1425, 1426, 1427, 1541,
1542, 1543, 1544, or 1546 of this title, or a violation of, or
conspiracy to violate, section 1028 of this title if committed in
connection with passport or visa issuance or use, shall order
that the person forfeit to the United States, regardless of any
provision of State law—
(i) any conveyance, including any vessel, vehicle, or
aircraft used in the commission of the offense of which
the person is convicted; and
(ii) any property real or personal—
(I) that constitutes, or is derived from or is
traceable to the proceeds obtained directly or
indirectly from the commission of the offense of
which the person is convicted; or
(II) that is used to facilitate, or is intended to be
used to facilitate, the commission of the offense of
which the person is convicted.
(B) The court, in imposing sentence on a person
described in subparagraph (A), shall order that the person
forfeit to the United States all property described in that
subparagraph.
(7) The court, in imposing sentence on a person convicted
of a Federal health care offense, shall order the person to
forfeit property, real or personal, that constitutes or is derived,
directly or indirectly, from gross proceeds traceable to the
commission of the offense.
38 • Asset Forfeiture Statutes
18 U.S.C. § 983
(8) The court, in sentencing a defendant convicted of an
offense under section 1028, 1029, 1341, 1342, 1343, or 1344,
or of a conspiracy to commit such an offense, if the offense
involves telemarketing (as that term is defined in section
2325), shall order that the defendant forfeit to the United
States any real or personal property—
(A) used or intended to be used to commit, to facilitate,
or to promote the commission of such offense; and
(B) constituting, derived from, or traceable to the gross
proceeds that the defendant obtained directly or indirectly
as a result of the offense.
(b)(1) The forfeiture of property under this section, including
any seizure and disposition of the property and any related
judicial or administrative proceeding, shall be governed by
the provisions of section 413 (other than subsection (d) of
that section) of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention
and Control Act of 1970 (21 U.S.C. 853).
(2) The substitution of assets provisions of subsection
413(p) shall not be used to order a defendant to forfeit assets
in place of the actual property laundered where such defendant
acted merely as an intermediary who handled but did not retain
the property in the course of the money laundering offense
unless the defendant, in committing the offense or offenses
giving rise to the forfeiture, conducted three or more separate
transactions involving a total of $100,000 or more in any
twelve month period.
Amended: Border Tunnel Prevention Act, Pub. L. 112-127

CONTINUING CONSPIRACY TO ENGAGE IN A PATTERN OR RACKETEERING ACTIVITY[CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT GENOCIDE, WAR CRIMES, VIOLATION OF THE NUREMBERG CODE, BIOTERRORI – LIST RETAILATION AGAINST TWO FEDERAL WITNESSES

EXPLOITING THE TWO WITNESSES, VIOLATIONS OF OATH OF OFFICE, ABUSING U.S. COURTS, feloniously stealing, taking away, alters, falsifies, or otherwise records, writ, process, or other proceeding, in the U.S. District Court, Court of Appeals for the D.C Circuit(Merrick Garland Chief Judge and other co-conspirators K.B, Jackson – U.S. Supreme Court Judge and other Judges and in the U.S. Supreme Court )any court of the United States, o acknowledges, or procures to be acknowledged in any such court, any recognizance, bail, or judgment, in the name of any other person not privy or consenting to the same in violation of 18 U.S. Code § 1506

IN A SCHEME TO OBTAIN 125 TRILLION DOLLARS WITHOUT DUE PROCESSS OF LAW(SEE BELOW)

Genocide,( genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity and ethnic cleansing. War crimes, Crimes against Humanity and Ethnic cleansing.

James and Sharon Bridgewater at all times mentioned were protected group of a race, religion and are perpetrators to physically destroy a national, ethnic, racial or religious group. deliberately targeted

Killing members of the group;
Causing serious bodily or mental harm to both Sharon and James Bridgewater members of the group;
Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group(by making false intentional misrepresentatives adminsting a covid injection which permanent changes James DNA forever, and “cut” off blood-line extermination;
Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

For the purpose of paragraph 1:
1. ‘Attack directed against any civilian population’ means a course of conduct involving the multiple commission of acts referred to in paragraph 1 against any civilian population, pursuant to or in furtherance of a State or organizational policy to commit such attack; crimes against humanity involve either large-scale violence in relation to the number of victims or its extension over a broad geographic area (widespread), or a methodical type of violence (systematic). This excludes random, accidental or isolated acts of violence. In addition, Article 7(2)(a) of the Rome Statute determines that crimes against humanity must be committed in furtherance of a State or organizational policy to commit an attack. The plan or policy does not need to be explicitly stipulated or formally adopted and can, therefore, be inferred from the totality of the circumstances.
Murder;
Extermination;
Enslavement;
Deportation or forcible transfer of population;
Imprisonment;
Torture;
Grave forms of sexual violence;
Persecution;
Enforced disappearance of persons;
The crime of apartheid;
Other inhumane acts

such as hostage taking, acts of terrorism, chemical list all, illegal immigration

HOSTAGE TAKING(TERRORIST ACT) IN VIOLATION OF INTERANAL LAW – ON OR ABOUT NOV. 4, 2012 DURING THE BARAK H. OBAMA VS. MITT RODNEY PRESIDENTAL ELECTIONS(SEE THIS WEBSITE)

War crimes in non-international armed conflicts include: shotting high powered ammuniation into Sharon and James Residence on or about Nov. 4, 2016 DURING THE DONALD TRUMP VS. HILLARY CLINTON PRESIDENTAL ELECTIONS(SEE THIS WEBSITE)

Serious violations of Article 3 common to the 1949 Geneva Conventions, such as:
o Violence to life and person, in particular murder of all kinds, mutilation, cruel treatment and torture of persons taking no active part in the hostilities, including members of armed forces who have laid down their arms and those placed hors de combat by sickness, wounds, detention, or any other cause against the sick, wounded and shipwrecked persons not taking part in hostilities, prisoners of war and other detainees, civilians and civilian objects.
Other serious violations of the laws and customs, such as:
o Intentionally directing attacks against the civilian population as such or against individual civilians not taking direct part in hostilities;
o Intentionally directing attacks against buildings dedicated to religion, education, art, science or charitable purposes, historic monuments, hospitals and places where the sick and wounded are collected, provided they are not military objectives.

By contrast to genocide and crimes against humanity, war crimes can be committed against a diversity of victims, either combatants or non-combatants, depending upon the type of crime. In international armed conflicts, victims include wounded and sick members of armed forces in the field and at sea, prisoners of war and civilians. In the case of non-international armed conflicts, protection is afforded to persons taking no active part in the hostilities, including members of armed forces who have laid down their arms and those placed ‘hors de combat’ by sickness, wounds, or detention. In both types of conflicts protection is also afforded to medical and religious personnel, humanitarian workers and civil defense staff.

ICC PRO

CRIMES OF AGRESSION

https://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/covid-19-checkpoints-targeting-out-of-state-residents-draw-complaints-and-legal-scrutiny/

https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/blogs/stateline/2020/04/08/border-checkpoints-discourage-travelers-between-states

https://www.cnn.com/2022/02/10/americas/canada-trucker-protests-covid-thursday/index.html

“crime of aggression” means the planning, preparation, initiation or execution, by a person in a position effectively to exercise control over or to direct the political or military action of a State, of an act of aggression which, by its character, gravity and scale, constitutes a manifest violation of the Charter of the United Nations.

2. For the purpose of paragraph 1, “act of aggression” means the use of armed force by a State against the sovereignty, territorial integrity or political independence of another State, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Charter of the United Nations. Any of the following acts, regardless of a declaration of war, shall, in accordance with United Nations General Assembly resolution 3314 (XXIX) of 14 December 1974, qualify as an act of aggression:

(a) The invasion or attack by the armed forces of a State of the territory of another State, or any military occupation, however temporary, resulting from such invasion or attack, or any annexation by the use of force of the territory of another State or part thereof;

(b) Bombardment by the armed forces of a State against the territory of another State or the use of any weapons by a State against the territory of another State;

(d) An attack by the armed forces of a State on the land, sea or air forces, or marine and air fleets of another State;

(e) The use of armed forces of one State which are within the territory of another State with the agreement of the receiving State, in contravention of the conditions provided for in the agreement or any extension of their presence in such territory beyond the termination of the agreement;

(f) The action of a State in allowing its territory, which it has placed at the disposal of another State, to be used by that other State for perpetrating an act of aggression against a third State;

(g) The sending by or on behalf of a State of armed bands, groups, irregulars or mercenaries, which carry out acts of armed force against another State of such gravity as to amount to the acts listed above, or its substantial involvement therein.

(SEE BELOW)

KAMALA HARRIS(AND PREDECESSORS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO BIDEN TERM), ET AL PUBLIC OFFICIALS ACTING IN THEIR INDIVIDUAL CAPACITIES UNDER THE COLOR OF LAW WITH FOREIGN OFFICIALS TO DEFRAUD “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL,” JUDGMENT CREDITOR IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 371(THE “50 STATES” EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENRAL AND/OR RELATOR VS. MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL-JACK SMITH SPECIAL PROSECUTOR IN THE JAN. 6, 2021 CAPITOL ATTACKS – DECLARATORY JUDGMENT & BINDING ADJUDICATION THAT ESTABLISHES THE RIGHTS AND OTHER LEGAL RELATIONS OF THE “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR VS. MERRICK GARLAND AND/OR JACK SMITH SPECIAL PROSECUTOR, ILLEGALLY, UNLAWFULLY APPOINTED BY GARLAND “CRIMINAL CLASS REPRESENTATIVE” declaratory judgment is a binding adjudication that establis, TRIAL, JUDGMENT, CRIMINAL SENTENCE, EXTRADICITION OF FORIGEN OFF) & INCLUDES CRIME VICTIMS COMPENSATION FOR ALL RECIPIENTS OF ONE OR MORE OF “EXPERMINENTAL” COV-19 INJECTIONS(S), RECEIPIENTS OF THE COVID NASAL SWAB TEST & INJURIES AND DAMAGES TO “ALL” VICTIMS OF “COVID-19 PLANDEMIC RELATED AND NOTICE OF “INTERNATIONAL ANTI-SUIT INJUNCTION AND/OR INJUNCTION”!!

AFFIDIVANT & NOTICE AND ADJUDICATION DECLARATORY JUDGMENT – TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER & PERMANENT “INTERNATIONAL INJUNCTION

” ENTITLED IN RE: “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR VS. JOE BIDEN IN HIS “DEFACTO” CAPACITY AS PRESIDENT[AND PREDECESSORS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUNING THRU TO PRESENT PINCLUDING BUT NOT L INJUNTION ENJOINING JOE BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS, MERRICK GARLAND, ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, ALL PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES, ALL TECH. COMPANIES, ALL “INTENTIONAL HEADS OF STATE & FORFEIGN OFFICIALS” ET AL (GOD IN HEAVEN GRANTS TWO WITNESSES THE POWER TO PROSECUTE AND ENJOIN ALL “HEADS OF STATE””LITERALLY” – SEE BELOW AUTHORITY)RESTRAINING & ENJOINING ALL LAWS, POLICIES, PRACTICES AND ACTIONS, MISRPESENTATIONS ABOUT THE “COV-19 INJECTION/INFECTION/PLANDEMIC” ENJOINING AND RESTRAINING JOE BIDEN & KAMALA HARRIS[AND PREDECESSORS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO BIDEN’S TERM)ET AL IN THEIR DEFACTO OFFICIAL CAPACITIES FROM GRANTING CHINA SOVERIGNTY OVER THE U.S.A. AND ENJOINING CHINA ET AL FROM CONSPIRING TO DEFRAUDING THE U.S.A. IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 371 & “INTERNATIONAL INJUNCTION AGAINST AND FROM CONSPIRING TO “GRANT CHINA” U.S. SOVERIGNTY(TREASON)

DESTROYING THE U.S.A.(SUCH AS THE JAN. 6, 2021 CAPITOL ATTACKS)AND EXPLOITING AND DEFRAUDED TWO WITNESSES(SHARON AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER – COMMITTING ACTS OF GENOCIDE, WAR CRIMES, CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY AND ENGAGING IN A PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY(& ENJOINS AND RESTRAIN JOE BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS, MERRICK GARLAND FROM ILLEGALLY, UNLAWFULLY FROM MY NAME IN “ANY” U.S. SUPREM COURT, D.C. COURT OF APPEALS OR DISTRICT USING SHARON BRIDGEWATER AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER NAME IN ANY U.S. SUPREME COURT, FEDERAL COURT ETC. WITHOUT MY CONSENT, RESTRAIN AND ENJOIN MERRICK GARLAND, JOE BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS FROM CONSPIR IN IN CRIMINAL JURISDICTION AS FOLLOWS:

AND INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM, CONSPIRACY AND VIOLATION OF THE NUREMBERG CODE, DECLARATORY JUDGMENT THAT ALL VIOLATED THE NUREMBERG CODE BY FRAUD, DECEIT, TRICK JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER AND/OR S. BRIDGEWATER)

(HUNDREDS AND/OR THOUSANDS OF LAWYERS AND/OR DOCTORS HAVE STARTED CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE PERPETRATORS FOR “BILLIONS” OF VIOLATIONS OF THE NUREMBERG CODE FOR EXPERIMENTAL COVID INJECTION “DEATH” JAB THAT: 1)CHANGE MEN AND WOMEN DNA AND/OR GENES, 2)PATENT MEN AND WOMEN FOR ENSLAVMENT AND “GLOBAL ELITE” OWNERSHIP, 3) THAT CONCEALED KNOWN FACTS FROM HUMANITY” AND THE TWO WITNESSES THEY WERE UNDER A DUTY TO DISCLOSE PUT DEFENSE ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECT AGENCY(DARPHA) BIOWEAPON HYDROGELS NANO TECHNOLOGIES AND/OR IMPLANTABLE NANOTECHNOLOGY IN “THE TWO WITNESSES AND/OR HUMANITY” VIA THE “RAZORBLADE COVID-19 INJECTION DEATH JAB(SEE THIS WEBSITE)” WITH FRAUD, FORCE AND/OR COERCION WITHOUT THE CONSENT AND WHICH HAVE KILLED MILLIONS(AND WILL KILL BILLIONS IN THE FUTURE)INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO BABY FORMULAS ,BUT HAVE BEEN UNSUCCESSFUL TO IM https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuremberg_CodeAND ATTEMPTED TO FOR INSTANCE DR. ROBERT FUELLMICH, AND COUNTLESS OTHERS HAVE STARTED CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE “INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL RACKET” BUT ARE UNABLE TO JUDGE AND/OR SENTENCE(AND/OR “JAIL”) THE PERPATRATORS BECAUSE THEY LACK STANDING – SEE BELOW FOR DEFINTION OF STANDING )

– SEE BELOW AFFIDIVANT AND INJUNCTION WRIT VIA CERTIFIED MAIL ON JAN. 6, 2023

OVERT- CRIMINAL ACT OF “DEFACTO” U.S. PRESIDENT BIDEN!! ONLY WHEN “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR WAS TYPING(BIDEN AND CO-CONSPIRATORS RECEIVED NOTICE VIA ILLEGAL INTERNET SPYING ON THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR INJUNCTION – SEE BELOW) AND/OR SENT A”CERTIFIED MAIL ON THE JAN. 6, 2021 ANNIVERSARY” AND ARREST WARRANTS IN REM FOR JOE BIDEN Knowingly employed by conducted or participated in enterprise through pattern of racketeering and/or for RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY(HARBORING ILLEGAL IMMIGATES -In 1996, Congress expanded RICO[SEE BELOW FOR DEFINTION] by adding violations listed in the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). These additions made RICO a new and very strong tool for private parties to use against persons and companies that profit by violating U.S. immigration law. Pursuant to these RICO provisions, violations of certain INA provisions meet the definition of racketeering activity, also known as “predicate offenses,” “for the purpose of financial gain.”) SEE BELOW – BIDEN MAKES A FIRST VISIT TO U.S. BORDER FOR THE FIRST TIME – RECEIVED AN INJUNCTION

OVERT ACT – STEPPING DOWN AND HIDING BEFORE ARRESTED!! – Dr. David A. Kessler

NOTICES -DEFAULTS , FORFEITURE PURSUANT TO THE RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATION ACT

icc-complaint-7-1 Download

https://rumble.com/v241l2m-geert-vanden-bossche-im-begging-you.-dont-vaccinate-your-children.-it-could.html

AFFIDIVANT & COMMON LAW NOTICE OF “COMMON LAW” OPEN COURT PROCEEDING PURSUANT TO ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME CLAIMS –“RETROACTIVE INTERVENTION AS A MATTER OF RIGHT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE(24A) RELATED KNOWN AND UNKNOWN U.S. SUPREME COURT CASES, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS CASES, FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT CASES, STATE COURT CASES ENTITLED SHARON BRIDGEWATER OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO DISMISSED CASE ENTITLED SHARON BRIDGEWATER VS. “HAYES VALLEY LIMITED PARTNERHIP ET AL IN THE SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA SUPERIOR[STATE COURT] CASE # CGC-08-478207 AND IN ALL DISMISSED CASES ENTITLED SHARON BRIDGEWATER VS. “THE U.S.A./”PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP CASES FROM AUGUST 2008 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT AND/OR FROM JAN. 1, 1993 VIA”THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR

AND CONTINUING THRU PRESENT”) OPEN “PUBLIC” COURT PROCEEDING AS OTHER NOTICE(S) AS FOLLOWS:

AFFIDIVANT AND INTERVENTION AS “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR A MATTER OF RIGHT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE CIVIL PROCEDURE 24A(THIS IS TIMELY, THE “50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR” HAVE AN UNCONDICTIONAL RIGHT TO INTERVENE BY A FEDERAL STATUTE – THE RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATION ACT(RICO), AND CLAIMS AN INTEREST RELATING TO THE PROPERTY AND/OR TRANACTION THAT IS THE SUJECT OF THIS ACTION, AND IS SO SITUATED THAT DISPOSING OF THE ACTION MAY AS A PRACTICIAL MATTER IMPAIR OR IMPEDE “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARRON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR ABILITY TO PROTECT ITS INTEREST UNLESS EXISTIG PARTIES(BOTH SHARON AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER)ADEQUATELY REPRESENT THAT INTEREST.

THE UNDERSIGNED SHARRON BRIDGEWATER BEING DULY SWORN DISPOSES AND SAYS AS FOLLOWS:

“THE 50 STATES EX REL SHAORN BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR Beginning on or about Jan. 1, 1993 and continuing thru the filing of this AFFIDIVANT within the District of Columbia and else in the US and/or “INTERNATIONALLY” Joe Biden in his “defacto” official capacity as President(and Predecessors from Jan. 1, 1993 and those operating under his direction Kamala Harris, Merrick Garland, all U.S. Supreme Court Justice, and continuing thru to present, did unlawfully, willfully and knowingly, intentionally combined, conspire together and with each other(and foreign Officials Heads of States), came to the meeting of the minds, entered into an unlawful agreement and/or came to a mutual understanding to accomplish a common and unlawful plan, namely to violate international law, money laundering, acts of Terrorism, list biological warfare on humanity and/or the two witnessesconspired to defraud the USA and/or the two witnesses engage in a “pattern of racketeering activity” discriminate, commit genocide, war crimes, violations of the Numerberg code, conceal known fact, trick to inject the COV-19 injection to _____________________________nano tech, _transhumanism, Military Grade weapon to control thoughts, memory, enslave commit_list predicate acts(violate a, b,c) and knowingly and willfully became a member of such conspiracy and futher, at the time, joined such conspiracy, he or she or they did so with the specific intent either to personally engage in at least two incidents of racketeering, as alleged in the Information,______________________ or he or she or they specifically intended to otherwise participate in the affairs of the “enterprise” with the knowledge and intent that other members of the conspiracy would engage in at least two incidents of racketeering, ______________________as alleged in the Information, as part of a “pattern of racketeering act or became a member without full knowledge of of all of the details of the unlawful scheme but has an understanding of the unlawful nature of a plan and knowingly and willfully joins in that plan on one occasion, and played a minor part. In the unlawful scheme.From on or about 2006 to the present, in Washington, D.C., Fairfax County, Virginia, in the Eastern District of Virginia, and elsewhere in Virginia, Denver, Colorado, New York City, N.Y. and, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Defendants o-conspirators for private gain and outside of their authority did unlawfully and knowingly conspire with each other and with others to devise and participate in a scheme to defraud the United States and the people of the United States of the honest services of Jane and John Does pursuant to their oaths of office, in furtherance of which in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§1341,1343, and 1346, by the use of interstate mails and interstate wire communications as a “step” in the scheme to deprive Sharon Bridgewater of the intangible right of the honest services of judges to conduct impartial judicial review in both Federal and State Judicial Branch as mandated by the Void Order Doctrine under Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch 137 (1803), andPennoyer v. Neff, 95 US 714 (1877), thereby depriving undersign counsel of his right to Jury trial, substantive and procedural to due process under Selling v. Redford, 243 U.S. 46 (1917), and Theard v. United States, 354 U.S. 278 (1957), to give reciprocal effect to the VSBDB void order despite the unrefuted evidence in the record that the VSBDB issued the order in violation of violation of Art. VI, § 1, § 5, and § 7 of the Virginia Constitution, in violation of its limited administrative authority under Va. Code §§ 54.1-3910, 3915, and 3935, and in violation of Va. Code §§ 18.2-481(5), 2-482, 499, by the VSBDB and Virginia Courts committing treason and misprision of a felony by “[r]esisting the execution of the laws under color of [their] authority as follows:

sharon-bridgewater-private-attorney-general-an1 Download

INTERVENTION EXH.’S A, B, C…….ADJUDIFICATION AND CONSOLIDATE RELATED CASES ETITLED SHARON AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER VS. HAYES VALLEY & THE STATE OF MICHIGAN VS. SHARON AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER(CRIMINAL CASES ALL DISMISSED AGAINST SHARON AND JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER)

ownerofpublicationandclaimofowner Download

NOTICE OF INTERNVENTION PURSUANT TO(24A) FRCP AND/OR COMMON LAW REMEI incorporates AS:

FORFEITURE OF ALL PROPERTY TANGILBE AND INTANGLE PURSUANT TO RICO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1963(D) MONEY LAUNDERING, HARBORING ILLEGAL IMMIGRATES, BIOWEA TERROISM

U.S.A. “RACKET-ILLEGAL ENTERPRISE SUCH AS MILITARY PERSONNEL, U.S. CITIZENS ETC. ALL HAVE BEEN DENIED AND/OR DEPRIVED THEIR FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHT(AND/OR ILLEGAL CENSORSHIP(VIA A CONSPIRACY UNDER THE COLOR OF “THE 50 STATES LAW” BY A PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP), DENIED COURT ACCESS

(BY ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT JUDGES, “MOST IF NOT ALL APPELLANT COURT JUDGES IN THE 50 STATES, MOST IF NOT ALL U.S. FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT JUDGES IN THE 50 STATES, MOST IF NOT ALL STATE COURT JUDGES IN THE 50 STATES, MOST IF NOT ALL ADMINSTRATIVE COURT JUDGES IN THE 50 STATES & JOINT PARTICIPATION WITH LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES(OPERATING DIRECTLY UNDER BIDEN AND/OR MERRICK GARLAND VIA CHAIN OF COMMAND AND RANK”) AND COMPLAINTS DISMISSED JUST LIKE “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR IN EVERY, DISTRICT COURT, APPEALLANT COURT TO FREE SPEECH AND ARE WITNESSES AND VICTIMS OF U.S. GOVENRMENT HARRASSMENT, BREAKING IN ENTERING, MALICIOUS PROSECUTION (JUST LIKE BRIDGEWATER – SEE YOUTUBE CHANNEL TESTIFY TO THE DNA COVID INJECTION ONE WITNESS AS AND COMPLAINTS DISMISSED FOLLOWS:

sharon-bridgewater-private-attorney-general-an1 Download

SEE THE ABOVE AND BELOW AFFIDIVANT OF “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AD/OR RELATOR!

https://www.thefinalexodus.com/in-1993-senator-biden-hurt-the-witnesses

RUSSIA’S V. PUTIN ET AL TO INTERFER WITH INTERSTATE & FOREIGN COMMERCE BY THREAT, VIOLENCE, OBSTRUCTION, DELAYS, ROBBERY EXTORTION & CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT PHYSICAL VIOLENCE(“WITHIN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA” AND ELSEWHERE IN THE U.S. ) IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C.§1951 & IN FURTHERANCE OF A PLAN TO DEFRAUD THE U.S.A. AND/OR THE TWO WITNESSES BOTH SHARON BRIDGEWATER AND JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER IN VIOLATION OF 30 R18 U.S.C.§ 371, LAUNDER MONEY IN VIOLATION OF ON OR MORE 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(1)(B), 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(2)(A), 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(2)(B), 18 U.S.C. § 1957, 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h), 18 U.S.C. § 1959, HARBOR AND ENCOURAGE ILLEGAL ALIENS TO ENTER THE U.S.A. IN VIOLATION OF ONE OR MORE ONE OR MORE Title 8, U.S.C. § 1324(a) 1324(a)(1)(i)-1324(a)(3)(v) 1324(a)(2) 1324(a)(3).Alien Smuggling IN VIOLATION OF 1324(a)(1)(A)(i)(a)(1)(A)(ii), HARBORING & ATTEMPTING TO CONCEAL ALIENS IN VIOLATION OF 1324(a)(1)(A)(iii)ENCOURING/INDUCING ALIENS TO ENTER THE U.S.A. IN VIOLATION OF 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv) CONSPIRACY/AIDING OR ABETTING IN VIOLATION OF 1324(a)(1), DOMESTIC TERRORISM & ELECTION FRAUD(A)FOR FINANCIAL GAIN.S S. BRIDGEWATER( HUMAN LIFE)

THAT ARE IN VIOLATION OF THE LAW OF THE U.S. AND/OR INTERNATIONAL LAW, WHICH ARE INTENDED TO INTIMIDATE, COERCE(THE TWO WITNESSES & HUMANITY[MEMBERS OF A CIVILIAN POPULATION)& TO INFLUENCE THE POLICY OF THE GOVERNMENT BY INTIMIDATION OR COERCION & TO AFFECT THE CONDUCT OF OF “THE GLOBAL GOVERNMENT” BY MASS DESTRUCTION, 18 U.S. Code § 2331 -“national of the United States” has the meaning given such term in section 101(a)(22) of the Immigration and Nationality Act;

attempted use, or threated use of physical force against the person of another; or (2) extortion, involves use of explosives, or otherwise involves conduct that presents a serious potential risk of physical injury to another. All maintained a________committed offenses as part of a pattern of cr

NOTICE OF“RETROACTIVE INTERVENTION OF “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR(JUDGE, PROSECUTOR, CLERK, ETC.-SEE BELOW)” IN ALL DISMISSED CASE ENTITLED SHARON BRIDGEWATER VS. “HAYES VALLEY LIMITED PARTNERHIP ET AL IN THE SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA SUPERIOR[STATE COURT] CASE # CGC-08-478207 AND IN ALL DISMISSED CASES ENTITLED SHARON BRIDGEWATER VS. “THE U.S.A./”PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP CASES FROM AUGUST 2008 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT AND/OR FROM JAN. 1, 1993

CERTIFICATION HERE

Whenever an action has been commenced in any court of the United States seeking relief from the denial of equal protection of the laws under the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution on account of race, color, religion, sex or national origin, the Attorney General for or in the name of the United States may intervene in such action upon timely application if the Attorney General certifies that the case is of general public. importance. In such action the United States shall be entitled to the same relief as if it had instituted the action. (SEE ABOVE FORM – 2000D]

jurisdiction-1 Download

ONE OR MORE OTHER CRIMINAL STATUES JURISDICTION

28 U.S. Code § 1605A – Terrorism exception to the jurisdictional immunity of a foreign state

.ONE OR MORE OTHER CRIMINAL STATUES JURISDICTION

statutory authorities: 28 USC section 1331, 28 USC section 1367, . Moreover, this Court is an Article III court with e express authority to hear and adjucate any questions arising underthe constitution, Laws, and Treaties of the United States , including but not limited to the bill of rights, the Ninth amendment, the tenth amendment, and/or the eleventh amendment, and “ALL AMENDMENTS” OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION, THE international Convenant of Civil and Political rights and the Universal declaration of Human rights, with the reservations. The Supremancy clause of the Constitution of the United States of America, as lawfully amended(HEREINAFTER “FEDERAL CONSTITUTION”); and further this United States District Court for the District Court of Columbia, has original jurisdiction of the instant matters pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1964(c) (Civil RICO); Breach of fiduary duties, breach of international peace, “aiding and abetting,” criminal conspiracy, criminal human trafficking, illegal abortions, criminal human trafficking of body parts jurisdiction, money laundering, Extra- territoristial Jurisidiction, special maritime jurisdiction within the United States, 28 U.S.C. 2241 and 2242 (Habeas Corpus); 31 U.S.C. 3730(h) (Relief from retaliatory actions); 42 U.S.C. 1985(2) and 1985(3) (Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights); 42 U.S.C. 1986 (Action for neglect to prevent conspiracy); and, ancillary jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1651, asset freeze, temporary restraining order and to issue prerogative writs in the nature of quo warranto, and/or Rules 13(b), 13(d) and 81(a)(4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“FRCP”) ; mandamus juridistiction writ of prohibition, contempt of court in violation of national security, Federal Asset Forfeiture Statutes of 981(a)(1)(D) and 982(a)(6). Violations ..44. § 982(a)(7)., 18 USC 286, 287, Rule E. Actions in Rem and Quasi in Rem, quo warranto and habeas corpus.. This United States District Court for this District of Columbia has original jurisidiction matter pursuant fo 18 USC section 1964( a and/or c)(civil RICO); 28 USC 2241 and 2242(Habeas Corpus); 31 USC section 3730(h)(Relief from retaliatory actions); 42 USC section 1985(2) and 1985(3)(Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights); 42 USC section 1986(action for neglect to prevent conspiracy);, and ancillary jurisdiction pursuant to 28 USC 1651, to issue prerogative writs in the nature of quo warranto, in order to prevent the continued exerces of authority unlawfully asserted; see Johnson v. Manhattan, 289 U.S.C. 479(1933), and ryder v. United States infra. See also Rules 13(b), 13(d) and 81(a)(4) of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“FRCP”)and/or (i) 28 U.S.C. §1331, (ii) 28 U.S.C. §1343(a), and (iii) D.C. Code, Division II, Title 16, Chapter 35. re; quo warranto and habeas corpus. . Special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States for acts committed against the CLASS REPRESENTATIVE(AND REPRESENTATIVE OF PUBLIC INTEREST) and/or the class outside the jurisdiction of “states” with respect to offense(s) by and/or against the CLASS REPRESENTATIVE(AND REPRESENTATIVE OF PUBLIC INTEREST) “a national and/or citizen of the United States.” Diversity of Citizenship jurisdiction 1332,admirality and maritime jurisdiction, Quasi in rem jurirsidction, in rem juridisction, forfeiture of assets jurisdiction, . 18 USCS § 1531(b), default judgment in rem jurisidiction, 42 usc section 1985, 1983, 1986, 1982, 1981- 18[242/241] anti-trust/racketeering jurisidiction, violation of international laws and treaties This District Court have admrallity and martime jurisidiction statin a maritme claim with the meanin of Rule 9(h) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Supplemental Admirality Rule E, C and/or G as hereinafter more fully appears This court has jurisdiction pursuant to one or more of the following: (i) 28 U.S.C. §1331; (ii) 28 U.S.C. §1343(a); (iii) 28 U.S.C. §2201 and §2202; (iv) 42 U.S.C. §1983; (v) D.C. Code, Division II, Title 16, Chapter 35.Obama, Lynch and other co-conspirator who , unlawfuly, upurps, intrudes Public Office, and/or 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)(c) (Civil RICO); U.S.C. 2241 and 2242 or all habeas statue jurisiction(Habeas Corpus); Mandumus, Writof Prohibition jurisdiction, and pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1651, ) and 81(a)(4) of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“FRCP”)and/or (i) 28 U.S.C. §1331, (ii) 28 U.S.C. §1343(a), and (iii) D.C. Code, Division II, Title 16, Chapter 35. re; quo warranto and habeas corpus 2254, §1956(a)(2)(B), 18 U.S.C. 1957;18 U.S.C. ‘ 2241(b)(2),18 U.S.C. ‘ 2242 (state court) . Impeachment jurisdiction, Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA) [interstate/which broadly defines a “class action” as “any civil action filed under rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or similar State statute or rule of judicial procedure authorizing an action to be brought by 1 or more representative persons as a class action.” Id. §1332(d)(1)(B). The class exceeds 100 members and upon information and belief the class exceeds one billion persons.(international and/or national class). The controversy exceeds the sum or value of $5,000,000 and the parties are minimally diverse pursuant to §1332(d)(2): A citizen of a state different from any defendant.A foreign state or a citizen or subject of a foreign state and any defendant is a citizen of a state. A citizen of a state and any defendant is a foreign state or a citizen or subject of a foreign state.28 U..C. § 1332(d)(2)(A)-(C) as between one-third and two-thirds of the class members and the Class Plaintiffs Representative are defendants are citizens of different state, and a district court and the district court of Columbia shuld exercise jurisdiction” where more than two-thirds of the class members and a defendant are citizens of the forum state. Venue further is met via federal false claims act __________, the Federal Rackeeteered Influenced and Corrupt Organization act(violations of the Sherman Act, civil rights violations, human rights violations, violations of international treaties and laws(Genova, Hague )

COMPLETE DIVERSITY EXIST BETWEEN MERRICK GARLAND CLASS REPRESENTATIVE(AND REPRESENTATIVE OF PUBLIC INTEREST) PLAINTIFF AND SHARON BRIDGEWATER 1332 complete diversity between Lynch and class defendant and/or respondant.

Special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States for acts committed against the CLASS REPRESENTATIVE(AND REPRESENTATIVE OF PUBLIC INTEREST) and/or the class outside the jurisdiction of “states” with respect to offense(s) by and/or against the CLASS REPRESENTATIVE(AND REPRESENTATIVE OF PUBLIC INTEREST) “a national and/or citizen of the United States.” FRCP rule 23 which is brought by 1 or more representative persons “THE United States ex rel Sharon Bridgewater private attorney general and qui tam relator on behalf of herself and others similarly situated. The class exceeds 200 members. The controversy exceeds the sum or value of $5,000,000 and the parties are minimally diverse pursuant to §1332(d)(2): This court has jurisdiction and authority to hear questions arising under the Constitution, Laws, and Treaties of the United States, including but not limited to the First Amendment, Fourth Amendment, Sixth Amendment, Eighth Amendment, Ninth Amendment, Tenth Amendment, Thirteenth Amendment, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The judicial power shall extend to all cases, in law and equity, arising under this Constitution, the laws of the United States, and treaties made, or which shall be made, under their authority;–to all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls;–to all cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction;–to controversies to which the United States shall be a party;–to controversies between two or more states;–between a state and citizens of another state;–between citizens of different states;–between citizens of the same state claiming lands under grants of different states, and between a state, or the citizens thereof, and foreign states, citizens or subjects. To this affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, and those in which a state shall be party, the Supreme Court shall have original jurisdiction. In all the other cases before mentioned, the Supreme Court shall have appellate jurisdiction, both as to law and fact, with such exceptions, and under such regulations as the Congress shall make. This court also has jurisdiction pursuant to one or more crimes Arson or Attempted Arson (18 U.S.C. § 81). . . . . . .Conspiracy to Commit Arson

(

9(H) , TREASON, SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY, ADVOCATING TO OVERTHROW OUR CONSTITUTIONAL FORM OF GOVERNMENT , SLAVERY AND PEONAGE, TORTURE, SELLING ORGANS AND HUMAN BODY PARTS FOR PROFIT, SEXUAL EXPLOITATIONJ, PROSTITUTION OF MINORS AND ADULTS, concurrent jurisdiction with International Criminal Court

his is a complex civil action for RICO remedies authorized by the federal statutes at 18 U.S.C. 1961 et seq.; for declaratory and injunctive relief; for actual, consequential and exemplary damages; and for all other relief which this honorable Superior Court deems just and proper under all circumstances which have occasioned this Initial COMPLAINT. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 1964(a) and (c) (“Civil RICO”). The primary cause of this action is a widespread criminal enterprise engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity across International, Federal and/or State lines, and a conspiracy to engage in racketeering activity involving numerous RICO predicate acts during the past ten (10)-(20) calendar years. The predicate acts alleged here cluster around obstruction of justice, obstruction of congressional investigation, 18 U.S.C. 1512, Obstruction by Violence in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1512(a) Obstruction by Intimidation, Threats, Persuasion, or Deception in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1512(b) Obstruction by Destruction of Evidence in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1512(c), Obstruction by Harassment in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1512(d) , Obstructing Federal Courts in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1503, Interfering with Jurors or Judicial Officials in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1503, Obstructing Congressional or Administrative Proceedings in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1505, Retaliating Against Federal Witnesses in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1513, Conspiracy to Obstruct in violation of 18 U.S.C. 371), Conspiracy to Defraud, Contempt of Court, Criminal Contempt, Civil Contempt, Contempt of Congress, Obstruction of Justice by Bribery, Bribery of Jurors, Public Officers and Witnesses in violation of 18 U.S.C. 201, Obstruction by Mail or Wire Fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1341, 1343, 1346, Obstruction by Extortion Under Color of Official Right in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1951, Obstruction of Investigations by Bribery in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1510(a), Obstruction of Justice by Destruction of Evidence,Obstruction of Investigations by Destruction of Evidence in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1519, Destruction of Corporate Audit Records in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1520, Destruction of Property to Prevent Seizure in violation of 18 U.S.C. 2232(a), Obstruction of Justice by Deception, Perjury in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1623 and/or 18 U.S.C. 1621 and False Statements in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1001. See 18 U.S.C. §§1341 , 1344, 1346, 2319, 2320,2315, 1503, 1510, 1511 (AND A HOST OF OTHER CRIMES AS DEFINED IN 18 USC SECTION 1961 -et seq..) peonage and slavery[OBSTRUCTION RICO PROHIBITED ACTS – and human rights violations, money laundering, control substance, trafficking weapons in violation of international law, trafficking in human body parts and/or organs, sexual exploitation, illegal monopolopy in Real Estate Transactions, sale of securities and/or fraud , tampering with and retaliation against a qualified Federal Witness, interstate transportation of stolen property, tampering with and retaliation against a qualified Federal Witness, obstruction of justice, obstruction of congressional investigation, obstruction of criminal investigations, slavery, . wire fraud, mail fraud and bank fraud, peonage and slavery, war crimes, torture, illegal immigration(aiding and abetting illegal immigrates “for profit,”) and a host of other international crimes. See one or more 18 U.S.C. §§ §§ 1341 and 1344, 2319, 2320, 1512, 1513, 2315, 1503, 1505, 1510, 1511 and 1324. The extent of the “international rico gang – Rackeeteering across international and/or foreign boundries are best illistrated and/or is shown as follows:

JOE BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS AND DONALD TRUMP CONSPIRACY AS FOLLOWS – THE TWO WITNESSES AND U.S. POPULATION ARE PEOPLE

pyramid1 Download

AUTHORITY AND LAW ALSO SEE ADDITITIONAL LAW – CLICK HERE-

the-racketeered-influenced-and-corrupt-organization-law-as-follows Download

https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/content/rico-act.html

THE U.S.A. WAIVES SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY FOR MARITIME CLAIMS AGAINST THE U.S.A.

NO IMMMUNITY FOR U.S. PRESIDENT FROM JAN. 1, 1993 & IT IS WAIVED VIA ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME LAW!! ALL HAVE CONSENTED TO BE SUED IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS U.S. PRESIDENT(PER ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME LAW)!!

Barak H. Obama and/or Eric Holder Jr. (their predescors from 1993 thru present) et al “Public Officials” the Plaintiff sue individually and sues and in their official capacities with respect to writ of mandamus , writ of prohibition etc. Plaintiff further sues foreign officials in their official and/or individual capacity. Barak Obama(2008- ), George W. Bush (2001- 2008), William Bill Clinton( 1993-2001), George H. W. Bush (1989-1993) according to the context, the terms“Bush I Administration, Bush II Administration,” “Clinton Administration,” and “Obama Adminstration” denote, respectively, the presidential terms of office of and or, collectively, to the senior officials who comprised, from time to time, the policy-making governmental and political apparatus of each of those administrations. authority, plaintiff sues each of said defendants, as the acts complained of were not within the scope of such defendants’ official duties, but were crimes and unlawful acts outside the scope of such duties and such acts and omissions were done under color of Federal and/or State law and/or official right.class plaintiff seeks recovery for the acts and omissions of each such defendant individually and from his or her personal assets, not against the government body that is (or was) such defendant’s employer at the time of the acts complained. On or about 1993 and continuing thru present, Plaintiff and/or Petitioner in this action, along with other Plaintiffs and/or Petitioner filed multiple civil or criminal complaints and/or lawsuits in the United States Supreme Court, Appealant Courts, US Federal District Court, State Court or small claims court throughout the “United States,” all cases have been dismissed. The obstruction has occurred in these court cases, in part by impersonation of Supreme Court Justices, Circuit Court Judges, Appelant Court Judges, Article III federal judges, State Court Judges, Commissioners, etc. “within the contientinal of the 50 States” in violation of 18 U.S.C. 912 (a federal felony). As such, federal officers, State or local judicial officers including but not limited to Judge Lambert in this US District Court of the District Court of Columbia are now among the probable causes that threaten further continuation of the severe economic hardship and other wrongs described above and the Plaintiffs the United States and/or the Class Plaintiff have no other adequate remedies at law. The Plaintiff, hereby makes a formal offer to prove, that the instant action must not be removed to any US Supremem Court Judges, or Appelant Court Judges because of demonstrable bias and prejudice among Judges, officers and employees of these courts, and the Class Plaintiffs and/or the United States have no other adequate remedies at law. All the Defendants, and each of them, did the acts and omissions hereinafter alleged in bad faith and with knowledge that their conduct violated well established and settled law. The federal government has waived sovereign immunity in this action under the Rackeeteered Influence and Corrupt Organition Act and/or the “Stripping dotrine”The United States, ex rel Sharon Bridgewater private attorney general and/or a “Representative of Public interest” et al have other adequate remedies at law. The U.S. Government via Admiralty and maritime law provide

Suits filed against state officials under the stripping doctrine permits a state official who used his or his or her position to act illegally to be sued in his or her individual capacity, and the government is immune from being sued through respondeat superior.

[3]Suits filed against state officials under the stripping doctrine permits a state official who used his or his or her position to act illegally to be sued in his or her individual capacity,

Circumstances from which the claim arises with such particularly that the Defendants or claimant will be able, without moving for a more definite statement

rule-g Download

ARREST WARRANTS -CLICK HERE- ADJUDICATION/JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE FOR MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AND/OR INDIVIUDALLY HERE

VIOLATION OF THE THE TWO WITNESSES 1ST AMENDMENT RIGHT, THE RIGHT TO WORSHIP YESHUA/JESUS CHRIST, FORCED WORSHIP, DIGITAL DOLLARS, FRAUD, NUERO BRAIN IMPLANTS

TO ENSLAVE MND CONTROL VIA THE COV-19 VACCINE, AND DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES OUT OF ALL MONEY AND PROPERTY IN THE BANK. BIDEN EXECUTIVE ORDER

5G NETWORK, WEAPON OF MASS DESTRUCTION, NEURO WEAPONS AND MILITARY GRADE WEAPON AGAINST HUMANITY!!

FRAUD, DECEIT, COERCION, CHANGING OF DNA, BIOTERRORISM(COVID-19 MANDATE IS “HACKING THE HUMAN BODY AND BRAIN” TO ENFORCE, (COVID-19 MANDATE IS ACTUALLY – A NANOTECH MANDATE, TRANSHUMANISM, COVID FRAUD, TO CHANGE HUMAN DNA, CONTROL,

Declaratory Judgment Act(The declaratory Judgment act permits adjudifiation of an actual controversty between parties that is manifest or that is unaviable in the immediate future, an actual, ripe[INCLUDE ACTUAL LANGUAGE] controversy exist between the “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR” AND MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS “DEFACTO” for his actions of identity theft(illegal use of my name in the U.S. Court of Appeals, list all crimes 2and to “declare” the rights and legal relations of the parties to the controversy(JOE BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS, MERRICK GARLAND, DONALD TRUMP, ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, ALL; such declarations have the force and effect of a final judgment. This common law court has ripen, and ripe for adjudification. COMMON LAW REMEDIES AND PURSUANT TO THE RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATION ACT!

VS.

AFFIDIVANT OF SHARON BRIDGEWATER VIA “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER(AS PROSECUTOR FOR THE “50 STATES” PURSUANT TO RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATION ACT(RICO) VS. MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL(CRIMINAL CLASS REPRESENTATIVE AND JACK SMITH SPECIAL PROSECUTOR FOR JAN. 6. 2021(AND PREDECESSORS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRUTO HIS TERM) MERRICK GARLAND(JOE BIDEN, KAMAL HARRIS, ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, ET AL ARE RESPONSIBLE CAPITOL ATTACKS GUILTY OF 18 U.S. Code § 2383 – Rebellion or insurrection incapable of holding any office under the United States AS FOLLOWS:

a judicial determination as to the above controvery. A declaration that Joe Biden in his official capacity as Vice President entered into a conspiracy with Obama, immigration offense is guilty of Racketeering and illegally unlawful occupies upurps the office of the President the Donald Trump Executive Order A judicial declaration is necessary and appropriate at this time under the circumstances. The Unitedhas exhausted all available remedies and has not other adequate remedies at law without this court intervention and immediate declaratory and injunctive relief pursuant to Fed. R

CLICK HERE FOR AFFIDIVANT

c-mail Download

ALL U.S. SURPREME COURT JUSTICES IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITIES, U.S. REPRESENTATIVES IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITIES, ALL SPECIAL PROSECUTORS APPOINTED BY U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL(FROM JAN.1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO JACK SMITH

CONTINUING CONSPIRACY 1-12-2023

https://www.nbcnews.com/video/garland-announces-special-counsel-for-biden-classified-documents-investigation-159802949867

Robert Hur as special counsel to oversee the review of classified documents found at President Biden’s office at the Penn Biden Center and at his Delaware home.

CERTIFIED MAIL SENT AGAIN TO MERRICK GARLAND AND ROBERT HUR

U..S PRESIDENT FROM 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT

HAD A MAINTAIN NATIONAL BORDER, LIST HERRE

EXH.’S AS FOLLOWS:

THE CONTROVERSY BETWEEN JOE BIDEN IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AND/OR INDIVIDUALLY, MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AND/OR INDIVIDUALLY, DONALD TRUMP IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AND/OR INDIVIDUALLY, KAMALA HARRIS IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AND/OR INDIVIDUALLY, “ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITY AND/OR INDIVIDUALLY ET AL

The 50 States ex rel Sharon Bridgewater” private attorney general has a legally protectable stake and/or interest in the health, safety of myself, U.S. Citizens, Freedom, U.S. Constitutional and/or human rights and has a dispute that entitles her to bring this controversy before the court. The controvery that exist between Joe BidenDonald Trump in his official capacity as President and Sharon Bridgewater. list scheme to defraud, exploit, (see below TRO – permanent injunction against biden, U.S. Supreme Court Justice, special proseutor illegally using my name(documents “under seal”) in the U.S. Supreme Court and/or Court to obtain 125 Trillion, to enjoin Biden, harris from Conspiring with China to illegally enslave the two witnesses and/or U.S. Citizens without due process of law, and to defraud all U.s.Citizens out of all money and property via China/Biden and Rothchild Conspiracy and executive order “digital dollar(see below) running or holding the the office as the President in 2024 and/or Upurpingand other unlawful activity)

And that Donald Trump acts or omissions constitute illegal restraints in trade, and/or an illegally monopolopy and that the Appellant is fasley, maliciously imprisioned in violation of international/federal and/or state laws, and is entitled to immediate declaratory and/or injunctive relief. Controversy between the United States Supreme Court Justices, Merrick Garland, Dr. Faccui, Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Donald Trump and other via National Security, Putin and the COV-19 vaccine.

The 50 States ex rel Sharon Bridgewater” private attorney general has a legally protectable stake and/or interest and has a dispute that entitles her to bring this controversy before the court. The controvery that exist between JOE BIDEN Donald Trump in his official capacity as President and Sharon Bridgewater.

ON OR ABOUT JULY 9, 2013

COV-19 VACCINE MANDATES ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL WE ARE NOT THE GLOBAL ELITE PROPERTY AND VIOLATES US Supreme Court Strikes Down Gene Patents but Allows Patenting of Synthetic DNA THE COV-19 VACCINE IS PATENT, THEREFORE EVERY PERSON WHO RECEIVED THE COV-19 VACCINE NOW IS SOMEONE’S PROPERTY, IN ADDITION ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT JUDGES, MERRICK GARLAND THE CURRENT U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL(FORMER U.S. COURT OF APPEALS COURT JUDGE COMMITTED FRAUD) COMMITTED FRAUD, ISSUED VOID ORDERS WITHOUT JURISDICTION TO HEAR THE CASE IN AN ATTEMPT TO DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES OUT OF 125 TRILLION TO AID, HELP, ABET DONALD TRUMP, JOE BIDEN AND VAL

In a unanimous decision last month, the Supreme Court ruled that naturally occurring genes are not patentable. But, said the Court, cDNA, a man-made copy of the genetic messenger in cells, is patentable.

the Court also ruled that cDNA, an edited man-made copy of the gene, can be patented. Ruling that cDNA can be patented will have important consequences for research, including research to discover new disease treatments and create new genetic tests.

COV-19 VACCINES

complementary DNA (cDNA) is the enzyme reverse transcriptase. … Reverse transcriptase synthesizes a DNA strand complementary to an RNA are patentable making all who receive the COV-19 SOMEONE(THE GLOBAL ELITE-BILL GATES ET AL PROPERTY)

A reverse transcriptase (RT) is an enzyme used to generate complementary DNA (cDNA) from an RNA template, a process termed reverse transcription.

THOUSANDS, EVEN MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL IMMIGRATES ALLOWED IN THE U.S.A.(FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE TO INTERGRATE ALL IMMIGRATES & U.S. CITIZENS(TOGETHER)AND FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE(TO TELL THE PUBLIC IT’S IMPOSSIBLE TO KNOW “WHO’S WHO, & FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE TO FORCE/MANDATE VIA EXECUTIVE ORDER ALL TO GET THE COV-19 JAB, AND COMING INVISIBLE TATOO-TO IDENTIFY PEOPLE VIA “AN UNDERTHESKIN MARK

[

COV-19 VACCINE MANDATES ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL WE ARE NOT THE GLOBAL ELITE PROPERTY AND VIOLATES US Supreme Court Strikes Down Gene Patents but Allows Patenting of Synthetic DNA THE COV-19 VACCINE IS PATENT, THEREFORE EVERY PERSON WHO RECEIVED THE COV-19 VACCINE NOW IS SOMEONE’S PROPERTY, IN ADDITION ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT JUDGES, MERRICK GARLAND THE CURRENT U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL(FORMER U.S. COURT OF APPEALS COURT JUDGE COMMITTED FRAUD) COMMITTED FRAUD, ISSUED VOID ORDERS WITHOUT JURISDICTION TO HEAR THE CASE IN AN ATTEMPT TO DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES OUT OF 125 TRILLION TO AID, HELP, ABET DONALD TRUMP, JOE BIDEN AND VAL

COV-19 VACCINES

A reverse transcriptase (RT) is an enzyme used to generate complementary DNA (cDNA) from an RNA template, a process termed reverse transcription.

HOMELESS, IMMIGRATES, UNEMPLOYED, REFUGEES “INTERGRATION” DELARE A PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY WORLD WIDE” VIA THE PANDEMIC AND USE FORCE SO ALL THE POPULATION INCLUDING THE TWO WITNESSES WILL RECEIVED NANOTECH COVID INJECITON

“THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR CLASS REPRESENTATIVE (“FOR THE 50 STATES AND/OR “WE THE
PEOPLE”)CLAIMANT – JUDGMENT -CREDITOR sues/claims from defendants

In order to prove a Rico violation the “Plaintiffs and/or Petitioners”

the crime[s] charged, each of which the government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that an enterprise existed, which can included single individual or a group of people informally associated together for the common purpose of engaging in a course of conduct which have a common purpose, a core of personnel who function as a continuing unit. Furthermore, the enterprise must continue to exist in substantially similar form throughout the period charged. This does not mean that the membership must remain exactly identical, but the enterprise must have a recognizable core that continues throughout the period charged.

The information alleges that the following enterprise existed: <describe the alleged enterprise>.

[<Insert if appropriate:> Although the state contends that this group of individuals was known as <insert alleged name of enterprise>, you need not determine that the individuals actually referred to themselves by that name in order to find that an enterprise existed.]

In summary, in order to determine that an enterprise existed, you must find beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was

Element 2 – Association with the enterprise
The second element is that the defendant was associated with or was employed by the enterprise.

[<Insert if appropriate:> When the enterprise is alleged to be the defendant acting as an individual, the association is self-evident. In this case, the state contends that the defendant is the enterprise.]

[<Insert if appropriate:> The state contends that the defendant was associated with an enterprise described as a group of individuals known as <insert alleged name of enterprise>.]

It is not required that the defendant have been associated with the enterprise for the entire time that the enterprise existed. It is required, however, that the state prove beyond a reasonable doubt that at some time during the period indicated in the information the defendant was associated with the enterprise.

The state must show that the defendant’s association with the enterprise was knowing — that is, made with the knowledge of the existence of the criminal enterprise through a general awareness of some of its purposes, activities and personnel. If you find that the state has proved beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was knowingly associated with the enterprise, then the second element is satisfied.

Element 3 – Pattern of racketeering activity
The third element is that the defendant wilfully engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity. “Racketeering activity” means to commit, to attempt to commit, to conspire to commit, or to intentionally aid, solicit, coerce or intimidate another person to commit any crime which, at the time of its commission, was a felony chargeable by indictment or information under the provisions of the general statutes then applicable. <Insert underlying crimes as appropriate.>²

A “pattern of racketeering activity” means engaging in at least two incidents of racketeering activity that have the same or similar purposes, results, participants, victims or methods of commission or otherwise are interrelated by distinguishing characteristics, including a nexus to the same enterprise, and are not isolated incidents, provided the latter or last of such incidents occurred after October 1, 1982, and within five years after a prior incident of racketeering activity.³

The incidents of racketeering activity charged are: <Insert underlying crimes as necessary and take judicial notice that they are felonies.>

The elements of each of these alleged incidents will be covered in a few minutes. You must be unanimous as to which incidents of racketeering activity have been proved beyond a reasonable doubt before you may find that the third element of CORA has been satisfied. In other words, there must be at least two specific incidents of racketeering activity that all of you believe were committed by the defendant in order to convict the defendant under CORA.

Difference between “enterprise” and “pattern of racketeering”
An enterprise, as used in the statute, is not the same thing as the pattern of racketeering activity. In order to convict, the state must prove both that there was an enterprise and that the enterprise’s affairs were conducted through a pattern of racketeering activity. The enterprise in this case is alleged to be (the defendant himself / a group of individuals who associated together for a common purpose of engaging in a course of conduct). A pattern of racketeering activity, on the other hand, is a series of criminal acts.

The existence of the enterprise is proved by evidence of an ongoing organization, formal or informal, with a common purpose and by evidence that various core personnel of the group functioned as a continuing unit.

The pattern of racketeering activity, on the other hand, is proved by evidence of a minimum of two incidents of racketeering which the participant(s) in the enterprise committed.

The proof used to establish those separate elements may be the same or overlapping — for example, if you find that an ongoing enterprise existed, the existence of this enterprise may help establish that the separate incidents of racketeering activity were part of a “pattern” of continuing criminal activity. Nevertheless, you should bear in mind that proof of an enterprise does not necessarily establish proof of a pattern of racketeering activity, and vice versa. The enterprise is a separate element which must be proved by the state.

Element 4 – Knowingly conducted or participated in enterprise through pattern of racketeering
The fourth element is that the defendant, by engaging in racketeering activities, knowingly conducted or participated in the enterprise. A person acts “knowingly” with respect to conduct or to a circumstance described by a statute defining an offense when he is aware that his conduct is of such nature or that such circumstance exists. <See Knowledge,

Incident <insert number> of racketeering activity
The (first / next) alleged incident of racketeering activity reads as follows: <Read incident of racketeering activity.>

The state alleges that the defendant (committed / attempted to commit / conspired to commit / intentionally aided, solicited, coerced or intimidated another person to commit) <identify underlying crime and refer to instruction on that crime and then present the facts as presented by the state and the defendant>.⁴

If you find that the state has proved the elements of <identify underlying crime> beyond a reasonable doubt, then you will find this incident of racketeering activity proved. If you do not find that the state has proved those elements beyond a reasonable doubt, then you would find that the racketeering act of <identify underlying crime> has not been proved.

<Repeat for each charged incident of racketeering activity.>

Again, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant engaged in at least two incidents of racketeering activity that have the same or similar purposes, results, participants, victims or methods of commission or otherwise are interrelated by the distinguishing characteristics, including a nexus to the same enterprise, and are not isolated incidents, provided the latter or last of such incidents occurred after October 1, 1982, and within five years after a prior incident of racketeering activity. Sharon Bridgewater via “The 50 States ex rel Sharon Bridgewater Private Attorney General will show and prove that both Sharon & James S. Bridgewater victim and Federal Witnesses with first hand knowledge and will show and prove to this “COMMON LAW OPEN COURT AND THE PUBLIC” that,by direct “evidence,” including but not limited the testimony of witnesses, documents and other things received as exhibits, and any facts to establish guilt. B victims of “continual victims of exploitation engaged in at least two incidents of racketeering activity that have the same or similar purposes, results, participants, victims or methods of commission or otherwise are interrelated by the distinguishing characteristics, including a nexus to the same enterprise, and are not isolated incidents, provided the latter or last of such incidents occurred after October 1, 1982, and within five years after a prior incident of racketeering activity, and which requires immediate adjudification

“COMMON LAW OPEN PUBLIC COURT” HAS JURISIDICTION VIA ADMIRALITY OR MARITIME CLAIM (CLASS ACTION CRIMINAL PROSECUTION)FOR THE PURPOSES OF Rule 14(c), 38(e), 82 and the Supplimental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Claim for declaratory and injunctive relief.(SEE Supplemental rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims( of one or more of the following Rule A, B, C, D, E, F, G) within the meaning o of Rule 9(h) with respect to one or more of the following “common law” remedies:

Maritime time attachment and garnishment,
Actions in rem
Possessory, petitory, and partition actions,
And
Actions for exoneration from or limitation of liability
Forfeiture arising from a federal statue(18 USC 985); RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY

“ADMIRALTY AND MARTIME LAW PERMITS “COMMON LAW REMEDIES WHEN NO ADEQUATE REMEDIES ARE AT LAW, DENIAL OF COURT ACCESS, DISMISSAL OF 50 OR MORE COMPLAINTS, SCHEMES TO DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES WIRE FRAThe property in dispute is within the jurisidiction of the district of Columbia, or will be during the pendency of this action. Pursuant Supplimental rule requires that a complaint state the circumstances from which the claim arises with such particularly that the Defendants or claimant will be able, without moving for a more definite statement, to commence an investigation of the facts Supplimental Rule for certain admirality and martime claims b(1), C(2) and/or other Supplimental rules require that the rem actions be instituted by means of a verified complaint. THE VERFIED COMPLAINT IS AS FOLLOWS:

________ TOP OF PAGE

THE DEFENDANTS RECEIVED SERVICE OF THE COMPLAINT, ANSWERED THE COMPLAINT(CONSPIRED WITH JUDGES – VEXIT. ORDER, ETC), REFUSE TO DEFEND OR OTHERWISE PLEAD AND IS IN DEFAULT!! ALL DISMISSED DENIED THE FOLLOWING BELOW COMPLAINT “BY OPERATION OF LAW” IS THE COMPLAINT, EXPLOITED THE TWO WITNESSES DEFRAUDED OUT OF MONEY AND PROPERTY FAKE LIST HERE

THIS CRIMINAL PROCEEDING IS BURIFICATED INTO LI JUDGMENT, SENTENCE, FORFEITURE OF ALL TANGIBLE AND INTANGIBLE PROPERTY, FORFEITURE OF OFFICE,

On or about Jan. 1, 1993 and continuing thru to Present, George H. Bush, William B. Clinton, George W. Bush, Nov. 2008, Obama before taking his oath of office, as President of the United States of America, “palmed his hand on the Holy Bible while swearing, “I, Barak H. Obama, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which “he” and added, “So help me God!” Article. II. – The Executive Branch Section 1 – states before he/she enter on the Execution of his Office, he/she the President shall take the following Oath or Affirmation:

“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of

the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the

Immigration and Nationality Act Offenses

Section 1961(1)(F), added by several amendments in 1996, includes as racketeering activity:

any act which is indictable under the Immigration and Nationality Act, i.e., section

274 (relating to bringing in and harboring certain aliens), section 277 (relating to

aiding or assisting certain aliens to enter the United States), or section 278 (relating

to importation of aliens for immoral purposes) if the act indictable under such section

of such Act was committed for the purpose of financial gain.

These violations are codified, respectively, at 8 U.S.C. §§ 1324, 1327 and 1328. See also discussion of ex post facto issues arising from such amendments in Section VI(F)(4) below.

Representative cases charging Immigration and Nationality Act offenses:

Williams v. Mohawk Indus., Inc., 411 F.3d 1252 (11th Cir. 2005), vacated on other

grounds, 547 U.S. 1075 (2006). AND TO OFFSET AND “UNDUE VIA DAMAGE CONTROL – OVERT ACT AS FOLLOWS: https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/supreme-court-title-42-vote-keeps-border-shut-asylum-seekers-biden-pol-rcna62932 – SEE BIDEN INVITE DRAG QUEEN TO WHITE HOUSE, LIST ‘Once-in-a-lifetime’ blizzard kills at least 27 in western New York & https://www.cnn.com/us/live-news/winter-storm-christmas-weather-forecast-12-24-2022/index.html FOR 2022 CHRISTMAS(SEE OTHER OVERT ACTS, DAMAGE CONTROL – DECLARATORY JUDGMENT, ADJUDICATION, AND “RETROACTIVE” SENTENCING OF JOE BIDEN FOR CONSPIRING WITH ONE OR MORE DONALD TRUMP, PUTIN, XI JINPING AND MERRICK GARLAND ET AL IS GUITY OF 18 U.S. Code § 2383 – Rebellion or insurrection “LACKED THE LEGAL CAPACITY TO ACT AS PRESIDENT – CONVICTED OF RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY, CONSPIRING WITH DONALD TRUMP Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

Obama Anemsty Program constitute aiding and/or assisting certain aliens to enter the United States in violation of one or more section 1324, 1327, and/or 1328 in further of Obama’s Program, Joe Biden(Obama’s extention)

Constitution of the United States.”

All of the above named Defendants are Public official and/or individual capacity are Federal/State or local employees, and/or an “Actor” under the color of Federal and/or State and/or local law and/or person that acted in joint participations in their Public official and/or individual capacity are Federal/State or local employees, and Actor under the color of Federal and/or State and/or local law and/or person with within the scope of his employment and/or apparent authority. Principle place of business Washington, District of Columbia and/or elsewhere in the United States with “official responsibility” and/or position of public trust, with duties and/or obligations and/or direct administrative or operating authority; intermediate and/or final, and/or “exercise alone or with others;” and/or “personally” and/or through “subordinates,” to approve or disapprove, direct action of the legal affairs of United States Government Federal/State/or local Government, and/or are persons that acted in joint participation with The are Federal, State or local “Actor” under the color of Fed./state or local law and their actions are the same Principle place of business in Washington, District of Columbia with “official responsibility” duties and/or obligations and/or direct administrative or operating authority; intermediate and/or final, and/or “exercise alone or with others;” and/or “personally” and/or through “subordinates,” to approve or disapprove, direct action of the legal affairs of United States Government of the United States Housing and Urban Development. Nature Trade of Commerce: USA Housing and/or Real Estate, Law Enforcement and/or Judicial Branch /or Dovanan is a “public official;” a person in a “position of public trust with official federal responsibilities, obligation and/or duties, and/or all took oath of office and/or were individuals who acted in joint participation with one another (and that as defined in that

This criminal case has been brought by the United States government. I will sometimes refer to the government as the prosecution as “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERLA AND/OR RELATOR The government(THE 50 STATES) is represented at this trial by an assistant United States attorney, [_________]. The defendant, [__________], is represented by [his/her]

The Plaintiff and/or Petitioners brings chares agains the Defendant Barak H. Obama, et al with violation of the Rackeeteereed Influenced and Corrupt Organization act for having intentionally, _______, HEALTH C, Treason, conspired to overthrow the US Government, conspired to defraud US Taxpayers, Consumers, depriving US Taxpayers, Consumers the intangle right to honest service, distribution of herion, cocaine, majuria, illegal gun traffic upursation of public office of the United States President, and multiple other crimes which a federal law, which is contained in under the 1^st Count of this complaint. An Acutual contriversiy exist between Barak H. Obama(Eric Holder Jr. ), failed to do legal duties to prosecute “Banker” and other co-conspirator major fraud against the US A and the Plaintiff, faile to “global asset freeze” of forieInterest in documents, indictment. The Plaintiff in intervenes, Temporary restraining order, the rights of the the “50 States” Plaintiffs to books, documents, as private attorn

CONSPIRED UNDER THE COLOR OF LAW TO DESTROY AMERICA,VIA JAN COMMIT OFFENSES AGAINST THE TO discriminated against DEFRAUD THE U.S.A. & TWO WITNESSES IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 371conspire either to commit international crimes AGAINST THE TWO WITNESSES Geocide, violations of NUREMBERG CODE

multiple offense against the United States, abuse Power, exploit two socioecon minority business owners person employed by or associated with any enterprise engaged in, or the activities of which affect, interstate or foreign commerce, to conduct or participate, directly or indirectly, in the conduct of such enterprise’s affairs through a pattern of racketeering activity or collection of unlawful debt.or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, All the Defendants, knowingly, intentionally entered into a conspiracy discriminated, conspired under the color of law 18 U.S. Code § 241

WHICH INCLUDES EXECUTIONS BY ONE OR MORE FIRING SQUAD, ELECTROCUTION, POISONOUS GAS CHAMBER AS THE FOLLOWS:

Thank you for your response. ✨

Thank you for your response. ✨

Suits filed against state officials under the stripping doctrine permits a state official who used his or his or her position to act illegally to be sued in his or her individual capacity, and the government is immune from being sued through respondeat superior.

[3]Suits filed against state officials under the stripping doctrine permits a state official who used his or his or her position to act illegally to be sued in his or her individual capacity,

Share this: