Federal RICO statute provides that “[a]ny person injured
in his business or property by reason of a violation of section 1962 of this chapter may sue therefor in any appropriate United States district court and shall recover threefold the damages he sustains and the cost of the suit, including a reasonable attorney’s fee.” 18 U.S.C. § 1964(c) AND ACT AS PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND PROSECUTOR!! ADMIRALTY AND MARIT

             

AFFIDIVANT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS COUNSEL FOR “THE 50 STATES AND/OR THE PEOPLE OF THE 50 STATES” AND BY OPERATING OF LAW – THE DISMISSED COMPLAINT ENTITLED SHARON BRIDGEWATER VS. HAYES VALLEY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP(SAN FRANCISCO SUPERIOR COURT COMPLAINT) BY OPERATION OF LAW IS “THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT” OPERATES AS AN “FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT”

APPEARANCE AS “INTERNATIONAL PROSECUTOR” FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU PRESENT

                                                      NUNC PRO TUNC

due to U.S. Government[Transnational and/or National Corporations and Public Officials their individuals capacities acting in joint participation discriminating against one and/or two witnesses based on race, class, disability, religion, socioeconomic status under the color of law, committing criminal acts against their business, person or property and/or defrauding,  & willful, U.S. Constitutional rights and violation of deprivation of human rights in violation of the declaration of human rightsand U.S. Constitutional rights ),

WHICH MEAN, “now for then,” and refers to changing back to an earlier date of an order, judgment or filing of a document. Such a retroactive re-dating requires a court order which can be obtained by a showing that the earlier date would have been legal, and there was error, accidental omission or neglect which has caused a problem or inconvenience which can be cured. Often the judge will grant the nunc pro tunc order ex parte (with only the applicant appearing and without notice). 

EXH. A

THE PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY

CLICK HERE FOR OTHER EXH.’S

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE 50 STATES AND/OR THE PEOPLE AND/OR THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER ARE NOT THE SAME IN ONE!!

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA(PUBLIC OFFICIALS IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITIES EMPLOYED BY THE GOVERNMENT) 

REPRESENTS THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT

AND “WE THE PEOPLE”(declare that the Constitution derives its power not from a king or a Congress, but from the people themselves upon which the entire Constitution depends) THE PEOPLE OF THE 50 STATES AND/OR THE PEOPLE AND/OR THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER “REPRESENTS” THE PEOPLE OF THE 50 STATES!!

FILES THIS PRAECIPE AND NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AS FOLLOWS:

NOTICE OF “RETROACTIVE” FORFEITURE OF OFFICE, PROPERTY AND ARREST WARRANTS, ALSO IT IS DECREED, ORDERED, AND ADJUDED THAT ALL EXECUTIVE ORDER OF GEORGE H. BUSH, WILLIAM BILL CLINTON, GEORGE W. BUSH, BARAK H. OBAMA, DONALD TRUMP AND JOE BIDEN FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT IS NULL AND VOID AND WITHOUT ANY LEGAL EFFECT, NOTICE OF RETROACTIVE ARREST WARRANTS FOR INTERNATIONAL “HEADS” OF STATE, UNITED NATION REPRESENTATIVE, WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION REPRESENTATIVE FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT!!

RICO CASE STATEMENT

PLAINTIFF/CLAIMANT SEEKS FORFEITURE OF PROPERTY AS FOLLOW:

INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE U.S. FEDERAL RESERVE, ALL CENTRAL BANKS, INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND, THE WORLD BANK LOCATED IN WASHINGTON, D.C. PARENT ORGANIZATION – UNITED NATIONS(SUBSIDIARIES – INTERNATIONAL FINANCE CORPORATION)SILVER, PRECIOUS COINS, ALL GOLD, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO”GOLD TOLIET SEATS” LOCATED IN THE U.A.E. AND/OR SAUDIA ARABIA, OIL COMPANIES, ALL CYPOTOCURRENCIES AND ETC.

NOTICE OF RELATED CASES

(DISMISSAL OF 42 PLUS CASES FROM 2008 THRU TO 2019 IN VIOLATION OF BRIDGEWATER U.S. CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, ALL WHILE COMMITTING CRIMINAL ACTS AGAINST BOTH SHARON AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER ASSAULT(AND CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT ASSAULT), BATTERY, FALSE IMPRISIONMENT, FALSE ARREST, MALICIOUS PROSECUTION, WIRE FRAUD, MAIL FRAUD, THEFT, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE AND A HOST OF OTHER CRIMES -JUDICIAL RACKETEERING FROM 2008 AND CONTINUNING THRU TO PRESENT)

DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

VICTIM ORGANIZATIONAL STATEMENT

NOTICE TO ALL VICTIMS OF “INTERNATIONAL BIOTERRORIST BIOL PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTRNSHIPTHE COV-19 INJECTION”(DEATH JAB), VICTIMS OF PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP(U.S. GOVERNMENT AND MAJOR CORPORATIONS CENSORSHIP – VIOLATION OF THE TWO WITNESSES AND/OR U.S. CITIZENS 1ST AMENDMENT RIGHT TO FREE SPEECH VIA THE COV-19 INJECTIONS) – JACOB ROTHCHILD(“LEGAL” REPRESENTATIVE OF SATAN “LITERALLY”)COV-FRAUD, DECEPTION, RAPE, “EVERYTHING BAD”!

YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO:

• The right to be treated with fairness, dignity, sensitivity, and respect;
• The right to attend and be present at criminal justice proceedings;
• The right to be heard in the criminal justice process, including the right to confer with the prosecutor and submit a victim impact statement at sentencing, parole, and other similar proceedings;
• The right to be informed of proceedings and events in the criminal justice process, including the release or escape of the offender, legal rights and remedies, and available benefits and services, and access to records, referrals, and other information;
• The right to protection from intimidation and harassment;
• The right to restitution from the offender;
• The right to privacy;
• The right to apply for crime victim compensation;
• The right to restitution from the offender;
• The right to the expeditious return of personal property seized as evidence whenever possible;
• The right to a speedy trial and other proceedings free from unreasonable delay;
• The right to enforcement of these rights and access to other available remedies.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO ONE OR MORE

CERTIFICATION

42 USC Section, 2000a-1, 2 and/or 3

42 USC Section 2000 a-3

 42 USC Section 2000 e-2 

 42 USC section 2000d  

42  USC section 2000b

 42 USC Section 2000h-1

 42 USC Section 2000h-2

 42 USC section 2000e-2

CERTIFICATE OF INTEREST PARTIES

A FINAL JUDGMENT JUDGMENT OF $1,000,000,000,000,000,000.00(Quadrillion) AND/OR A DECREE IN THIS PROCEEDING IS RENDERED IN THE FAVOR OF THE UNITED STATES VIA “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR” PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1964(D)[FOR INJURIES, “CURRENT DEATH & FUTURE DEATHS” OF COVID INJECTION VICTIMS – MASS GLOBAL GENOCIDE[HOLOCAUST], MASS “MILLIONS” DISPLACMENT OF PEOPLE BECAUSE OF WAR AND OTHER CLAIMS – SEE BELOW). ALSO A CRIMINAL PROCEEDING IS BROUGHT BY THE UNITED STATES VIA “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR” AND ALL DEFENDANTS(JACOB ROTHCHILD, THE U.S. FEDERAL RESERVE, MAJOR CORPORATIONS OFFICERS, DIRECTORS, ETC. BIDEN, HARRIS, FOREIGN OFFICIAL ET AL PURSUANT 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1964(D) AND CLASS REPRESENTATIVES, ONE OR MORE JOE BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS, AND/OR MERRICK GARLAND ON BEHALF OF ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICE, ET AL IS ESTOP FROM DENYING THE ESSENTIAL ALLEGATIONS OF THE CRIMINAL OFFENSE IN THIS CIVIL PROCEEDING BROUGHT BY THE UNITED STATES VIA “THE 50 UNITED STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR!!

CLICK HERE FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT

INTRODUCTION

THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR bifurcate stages of criminal trial, sentencing, criminal forfeiture of all tangible and intangle property, CRIMINAL PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP ________________________________________________________________________________________brings chares against one or more Joe Biden, Barak H. Obama, Donald Trump, major corporations, et al with violation of the Racketeered Influenced and Corrupt Organization act for having intentionally,  _______,  Treason, conspired to overthrow the US Government, terrorism usurpation of public office of the United States President(AND OTHER PUBLIC OFFICES),     An actual controversy exist between Merrick Garland the U.S. Attorney General

and Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, all committed mail fraud, extortion and a host of other unlawful acts against my business, Temporary restraining order, the rights of the the “50 States”  Plaintiffs to books, documents, as private attorney general and standing to obtain relief,

For conspiracy statutes which do not require proof of an overt act, such as RICO (18 U.S.C. § 1961) or 21 U.S.C. § 846, the government must allege and prove that the conspiracy continued into the limitations period. The crucial question in this regard is the scope of the conspiratorial agreement, and the conspiracy is deemed to continue until its purpose has been achieved or abandoned. See United States v. Northern Imp. Co., 814 F.2d 540 (8th Cir. 1987); United States v. Coia, 719 F.2d 1120 (11th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 973 (1984).Retroactive law as a law
that, in respect to past transactions or considerations, does one of the following:
• takes away or impairs vested rights acquired under existing laws
• creates a new obligation and imposes a new duty
• attaches a new disability
retroactive statutes, finding that a retroactive
statute is a law that:
• intended to affect transactions that occurred, or rights that accrued, before the law
became operative; and
• ascribes effects to the transactions or rights not inherent in their nature, in view of the
law in force at the time they occurred.
The court focused on how the retrospective application of a law could destroy a right or create a
duty where one did not previously exist. Retroactive laws have a wide variety of applications,
including judicial and administrative procedures

In order to prove a Rico violation government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt  that #1 an enterprise existed(a public/private “transnational, international” bioweapons terrorist group – ongoing organization, formal or informal, with a common purpose and by evidence that various core personnel of the group functioned as a continuing unit) of a group of people informally associated together for the common purpose of engaging in a course of conduct which have a common purpose,  a core of personnel who function as a continuing unit, to defraud Sharon and/or James S. Bridgewater of money and/or property without from Jan. 1, 1993 and continuing thru to present. #2 And all Defendants are associated with or employed by the enterprise. #3 All the defendant knowingly willfully engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity and committed at least two incidents of racketeering activity that have the same or similar purposes, results, participants, victims or methods of commission or otherwise are interrelated by distinguishing characteristics, including a nexus to the same enterprise, and are not isolated incidents, against one or both Sharon and/or James S. Bridgewater – Two Witnesses and victim)and within five years after a prior incident of racketeering activity(“Racketeering activity” to commit, to attempt to commit, to conspire to commit, or intentionally aid, solicit, coerce or intimidate another person to commit crimes at the time of its commission, was a felony(attempted murder, theft, assault, battery, list) #4 All Knowingly conducted or participated in enterprise through pattern of racketeering 

The Plaintiff is a victim and Federal Witenss with first hand knowledge and will show and prove to this “”PUBLIC OPEN COURT” THAT JOE BIDEN(AND PREDECESSORS ARE GUILTY OF MULTIPLE CRIMES” OF WAR CRIMES, GENOCIDE, TREASON, RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY ETC. WHICH ESTABLISH MORE THAN PROBABLE

THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR bifurcate stages of criminal trial, sentencing, ________________________________________________________________________________________brings chares against one or more Joe Biden, Barak H. Obama, et al with violation of the Racketeered Influenced and Corrupt Organization act for having intentionally,  _______, Obamacare,  Treason, conspired to overthrow the US Government, terrorism usurpation of public office of the United States President(AND OTHER PUBLIC OFFICES),     An actual controversy exist between Merrick Garland the U.S. Attorney General

and Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, all committed mail fraud, extortion and a host of other unlawful acts against my business, emporary restraining order, the rights of the the “50 States”  Plaintiffs to books, documents, as private attorney general and standing to obtain relief,

In order to prove a Rico violation government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt  that #1 an enterprise existed(a public/private “transnational, international” bioweapons terrorist group – ongoing organization, formal or informal, with a common purpose and by evidence that various core personnel of the group functioned as a continuing unit) of a group of people informally associated together for the common purpose of engaging in a course of conduct which have a common purpose,  a core of personnel who function as a continuing unit, to defraud Sharon and/or James S. Bridgewater of money and/or property without from Jan. 1, 1993 and continuing thru to present. #2 And all Defendants are associated with or employed by the enterprise. #3 All the defendant knowingly willfully engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity and committed at least two incidents of racketeering activity that have the same or similar purposes, results, participants, victims or methods of commission or otherwise are interrelated by distinguishing characteristics, including a nexus to the same enterprise, and are not isolated incidents, against one or both Sharon and/or James S. Bridgewater – Two Witnesses and victim)and within five years after a prior incident of racketeering activity(“Racketeering activity” to commit, to attempt to commit, to conspire to commit, or intentionally aid, solicit, coerce or intimidate another person to commit crimes at the time of its commission, was a felony(attempted murder, theft, assault, battery, list) #4 All Knowingly conducted or participated in enterprise through pattern of racketeering 

The Plaintiff is a victim and Federal Witenss with first hand knowledge and will show and prove to this “”PUBLIC OPEN COURT” THAT JOE BIDEN(AND PREDECESSORS ARE GUILTY OF MULTIPLE CRIMES” OF WAR CRIMES, GENOCIDE, TREASON, RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY ETC. WHICH ESTABLISH MORE THAN PROBABLE CAUSE!! probable cause.

1

Section 1962(c) makes it a crime to conduct the affairs of an enterprise affecting interstate

or foreign commerce “through” a pattern of racketeering activity or through the alternative theory of collection of an unlawful debt.

Section 1962(d) makes it a crime to conspire to commit any of the three substantive RICO

offenses.

THIS IS A CRIMINAL CASE BROUGHT BY THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR “PROSECUTOR” VIA THE RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATION(WHICH PERMITS A PRIVATE PERSON INJURED AND DAMAGED TO “ACT” AS ATTORNEY GENERAL AND USE COMMON LAW REMEDIES VIA ADMIRALTY AND MARTIME LAW WHICH PERMITS A PRIVATE PERSON INJURED AND DAMAGED TO “ACT” AS ATTORNEY GENERAL AND USE COMMON LAW REMEDIES VIA ADMIRALTY AND MARTIME LAW. (BURIFICATION . (War Crimes, violations of the Nuremberg code, Genocide, Healthcare fraud, Treason, conspired to overthrow the US Government, conspiracy to engage in a pattern of racketeering activity to defraud the two witness(Sharon and/or James S. Bridgewater)out of money and/or property. In addition to illegal restraints in trade, conspiracy to restrain interstate and/or foreign commerce. Usurpation of public office of the United States President and multiple, multiple other crimes.

JURISDICTION

    

This “OPEN PUBLIC COURT” have jurisdiction via Admiralty and/or Maritime common law remedies in which the Claimant/Plaintiff(“THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEAWTER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL) have no other adequate remedies at law, for denial of court access, dismissal of 45 or more cases(judicial racketeering) and continued predicate acts as defined in 18 U.S.C. section 1961 conspiracy to restrain interstate and/or foreign commerce continued scheme to defraud two witnesses Sharon and/or James S. Bridgewater(Representatives of the 50 States and/or the people of the 50 states) out of money and/or property without due process of law(U.S. public officials acting in joint participation with Foreign Officials and Major Corporation to enslav

“Common Common Law Jurisdiction”

This admiralty and/or maritime claim “open court proceeding” have Common law jurisdiction for deprivation and denial of court access via 42 plus dismissed complaint of valid claims(judicial racketeering- see below related cases) of the two witnesses right to file a first amended complaint[pursuant to a Superior Court Judge Order see below (pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure every Plaintiff is allowed to file a first amended complaint “by right” without leave of the court –  plaintiff to amend their complaint one time within 21 days of serving the original complaint or at any point before the defendant answers – Rule 15 provides that the court should allow the plaintiff to amend the complaint when justice requires it)from August 4, 2008 and continuing thru present provides and this admiralty and/or maritime claim by operation of law is “the first amended complaint.” Congress allowed state courts to exercise concurrent jurisdiction over admiralty cases in which plaintiffs seek traditional common law remedies.

dismissal of all valid clurts in admiralty is therefore an amalgam of the general maritime law insofar as it is acceptable to the courts, modifications of that law by congressional amendment, the common law of torts and contracts as modified to the extent constitutionally possible by state legislation, and international prize law. This body of law is at all times subject to modification by the paramount authority of Congress acting in pursuance of its powers under the Admiralty and Maritime Clause and the Necessary and Proper Clause and, no doubt, the Commerce Clause, now that the Court’s interpretation of that clause has become so expansive. Of this power there has been uniform agreement among the Justices of the Court.

Admiralty and Maritime Cases.—Admiralty and maritime jurisdiction comprises two types of cases: (1) those involving acts committed on the high seas or other navigable waters, and (2) those involving contracts and transactions connected with shipping employed on the seas or navigable waters. In the first category, which includes prize cases and torts, injuries, and crimes committed on the high seas, jurisdiction is determined by the locality of the act, while in the second category subject matter is the primary determinative factor.⁹¹⁴ Specifically, contract cases include suits by seamen for wages,⁹¹⁵ cases arising out of marine insurance policies,⁹¹⁶ actions for towage⁹¹⁷ or pilotage⁹¹⁸ charges, actions on bottomry or respondentia bonds,⁹¹⁹ actions for repairs on a vessel already used in navigation,⁹²⁰ contracts of affreightment,⁹²¹ compensation for temporary wharfage,⁹²² agreements of consortship between the masters of two vessels engaged in wrecking,⁹²³ and surveys of damaged vessels.⁹²⁴ That is, admiralty jurisdiction “extends to all contracts, claims and services essentially maritime.”⁹²⁵ But the courts have never enunciated an unambiguous test which would enable one to determine in advance whether or not a given case is maritime.⁹²⁶ “The boundaries of admiralty jurisdiction over contracts—as opposed to torts or crimes—being conceptual rather than spatial, have always been difficult to draw. Precedent and usage are helpful insofar as they exclude or include certain common types of contract. . . .”⁹²⁷

Maritime torts include injuries against “ALL INTERNATIONAL HEADS OF STATE(FOREIGN OFFICIALS) IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITY” FOR JOINT PARTICIPATION WITH U.S. PRESIDENTS, MAJOR CORPORATIONS AND ONE OR MORE REAL ESTATE INVESTORS, WALL STREET INVESTORS AND MAJOR CORPORATIONS INVESTORS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT(and claim arising out of malicious prosecution, abuse of process, libel, slander, misrepresentation, deceit, or interference with contract rights and/or any claim based upon the exercise or performance or the failure to exercise or perform a discretionary function regardless – whether the discretion be abused – and they are not immune by Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976 (FSIA), 28 U.S.C. 1330, 1441(d), 1602 et seq., which provides that a foreign state and its agencies and instrumentalities are immune from the jurisdiction of federal and state courts in civil actions, subject to limited exceptions. ALL COMMITTED ACTS OF TERRORISM WHICH RESULT AND WILL CONTINUE TO RESULT IN PERSONAL INJURY AND/OR DEATH(and/or arbitrary deprivation of life -extrajudicial killing ) OF ONE OR BOTH WITNESSES – SHARON AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER ALL ARE “STATE SPONSOR TERRORIST AND/OR A STATE SPONSOR TERRORIST BIOLOGICAL WARFARE ENTERPRIZE” ACTING IN JOINT PARTICIPATION and provide material support or resources for such an act to each other to injure and harm the two witnesses(and/or humanity). International law prohibits the arbitrary deprivation of life, and extrajudicial killing. [t]errorism exception” provides that a foreign state that has been designated a state sponsor of terrorism is not immune from jurisdiction in certain civil actions for damages arising out of personal injury or death “caused by an act of * * * extrajudicial killing * * * or the provision of material support or resources for such an act”)  in which money damages are sought against a foreign state for personal injury or death, or damage to or loss of property, occurring in the United States and caused by the tortious act or omission of that foreign state or of any official or employee of that foreign state while acting within the scope of his office or employment, and acting in joint participation with U.S. Public Officials acting under the color or law to commit and continue to engage in a pattern of racketeering activity(violent crimes in aid of racketeering activity against the two witness in violation of 18 U.S. Code § 1959 – Violent crimes in aid of racketeering activity racketeering act

in which the action is based upon a commercial activity carried on in the United States by the foreign state; or upon an act performed in the United States in connection with a commercial activity of the foreign state elsewhere; or upon an act outside the territory of the United States in connection with a commercial activity of the foreign state elsewhere and that act causes a direct effect in the United States VIA ONE OR MORE COVID PANDEMIC – ILLEGAL RESTRAINTS IN TRADE, AND CONSPIRACY TO RESTRAIN COMMERCE AND/OR WHO WERE employed by or associated with any enterprise engaged in, or the activities of which affect, interstate or foreign commerce, to conduct or participate, directly or indirectly, in the conduct of such enterprise’s affairs through a pattern of racketeering activity or collection of unlawful debt. 18 U.S.C.A. § 1962(c) AND CAUSED THE TWO WITNESSES INJURIES AND DAMAGES!

This court has jurisdiction providing for declaratory and equitable and/or injunctive relief to prevent the deprivation under color of law of the “50 States,” rights, privileges, and immunities under the United States Constitution. Jurisdiction is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 28 USC sections 1333 to 1364, 2201, and 2202; 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983, 1985 and 1988 and the Constitution of the United States and more particularly the second ninth, tenth, and fourteenth amendments thereto. Further relief sought in this against racial discrimination, and/or discrimination based on religion, gender, disability, national origin, via the Class Plaintiff Bridgewater and thos similarly situated. (an international class/and/or national class of persons);  This court further have jurisdiction under Rule 23 and/or 28 USC section 1332 amounts in controversy exceeds $5,000,000 and one or more members of the class plaintiffs are citizens of different state from the defendants and/or one or more members of class plaintiffs and/or class defendants are citizens of a State and/or are citizens of a foreign state or subject of a foreign state. Class Representative Defendant Merrick is a citizen of the State of Delawas, Virginia and/or Maryland.  The Class Petitioner/Appellant/claimant Representative is a citizen of the State of Michigan.  There is complete diversity of Citizenship between Lynch and/or Bridgewater. (Class Representatives).This district Court also has jurisdiction to issue all writs necessary or appropriate in aid of its jurisdiction. 28 USC section 1651. Exceptional circumstances warrant the exercise of this court discretionay powers and adequate relief cannot be obtain in any other form from any other court. Also, the parties opposing the class has acted or refused to act on grounds generally applicable to the class, thereby making appropriate final injunctive relief or corresponding declaratory relief with respect to the class(CRIMINALS) as a whole. The questions of law or fact common to the members of the class predominate over any questions affecting individual members, and a class action is superior to other available methods for the fair and efficient adjudication of the controversy. The existence of intimidation and threats by the defendant class have and will deter potential plaintiffs from joining the suit as named plaintiffs, making class action status essential to ensure all victims receive justice. This Court have “common law jurisdiction for International Crimes, including but not limited to violations of the Nuremberg Code, War Crimes, Human rights violations, list

POOL OF REAL ESTATE INVESTORS

SCHEME TO DEFRAUD ALL U.S. CITIZENS, HUMANITY THE TWO WITENSSES AND/OR ANCESTORS

GENOCIDE OF CHRISTIANS LIVING IN THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE

(INCLUDING MURDER AND STARVATION)

Sometimes called the first genocide of the twentieth century, the Armenian genocide refers to the physical annihilation of Armenian Christian people living in the Ottoman Empire from spring 1915 through autumn 1916. There were approximately 1.5 million Armenians living in the multiethnic Ottoman Empire in 1915.

ROTHCHILD(AND CO-CONSPIRATORS) SCHEME TO DEFRAUD – ALL U.S. CITIZENS AND ALL!!

WOODROW WILSON – U.S. FEDERAL RESERVE ACT

National Security and Defense by Encouraging the Production, Conserving the Supply, and Controlling the Distribution of Food Products and Fuel” and became law on August 10, 1917

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Food_and_Fuel_Control_Act

What happened in Iran during World war 1?

At least 8–10 million Iranians out of a population of 18–20 million died of starvation and disease during the famine of 1917–1919. The Iranian holocaust was the biggest calamity of World War I and one of the worst genocides of the 20th century, yet it remained concealed for nearly a century.

IRAN DEAL

HITLER’S GOAL TO CHANGE MEN GENETIC MAKE – UP AND EXTERMINATE ALL RACES, AND ALL PEOPLE OTHER THAN “ARYAN” ALL WERE TARGETED FOR ANNIHILATION BY GERMANY(HITLER)

In addition to singling out Jews for complete annihilation, the Nazis targeted for discrimination and persecution, anyone they believed threatened their ideal of a ‘pure Aryan race’.

Nazi beliefs categorised people by race, and Hitler used the word ‘Aryan’ for his idea of a ‘pure German race’. The Nazis believed Aryan people were superior to all others. Their devotion to what they believed was racial purity and their opposition to racial mixing partly explains their hatred towards Jews, Roma and Sinti people (sometimes referred to as ‘Gypsies’) and black people. Slavic people, such as those from Poland and Russia, were considered inferior and were targeted because they lived in areas needed for German expansion.

The Nazis wanted to ‘improve’ the genetic make-up of the population and so persecuted people they deemed to be disabled, either mentally or physically, as well as gay people. Political opponents, primarily communists, trade unionists and social democrats, as well as those whose religious beliefs conflicted with Nazi ideology, such as Jehovah’s Witnesses, were also targeted for persecution.

Hundreds of thousands of lives were destroyed because of Nazi persecution, and many groups did not receive acknowledgement of their suffering until years after 1945.

(IRAN DEAL)

(IRAN DEAL )ETC.

WORLD WAR II

DURING WW2 – 1942-1943

IRAN STARVE IRANIAN CITIZENS(SEE WORLD WAR 1 & WORLD WAR III)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to navigationJump to search

Persian famine of 1942–1943
Country	Iran
Period	1942–1944
Total deaths	3-4 million (per Mohammad Gholi Majd)
Preceded by	1917–1919 famine

The Iranian famine of 1942–1943 refers to a period of major starvation that took place in Iran, which was under the rule of the Pahlavi dynasty. Iran at the time was occupied by the United Kingdom and Soviet Union despite being a neutral country in the Second World War.

“THE THIRD AND FINAL ANTI-CHRIST

(THE DIVERSE ANTI-CHRIST – ALL HEADS OF STATE VIA THE COV-19 INJECTION)

“ADOLF HITLER’S DAUGHTER” – ANGELA MERKEL(“HIDING” TO PREVENT PROSECUTION)CHANCELLOR OF GERMANY

“A ROTHCHILD”

MAJOR PLAYERS “ALL INTERNATIONAL HEADS OF STATE” AND MAJOR CORPORPORATIONS(public/private

HITLER’S GOAL TO CHANGE MEN GENETIC MAKE – UP AND EXTERMINATE ALL RACES, AND ALL PEOPLE OTHER THAN “ARYAN” ALL TARGETED VIA THE COV-19 INJECTION FOR ANNIHILATION BY GERMANY(HITLER’S DAUGHTER – LEFT)

ALL SOCIAL MEDIA COMPANIES, “BLOCK” REALITY AND WHAT’S REALLY GOING ON VIA THE COV-19 INJECTIONS AS FOLLOWS

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

BIDEN AND CO-CONSPIRATORS GOVERNOR CREATE AN AUTOPHERE OF RACIAL DIVISION(SEE HIS PREDECESSOR WILLLIAM BILL CLINTON “CREATES A TWO CLASS AMERICA – RICH AND POOR AND DELETES THE MIDDLE CLASS FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE TO CAUSE RACIAL TENSIONS AND DIVISIONS – OVER FOOD SHORTAGES TO INSTIGATE RACIAL WAR TO PERMIT CHINA TO COME IN AND TAKE OVER – SEE U.S. TRAIN – CHINESE TROOPS ON U.S. SOIL ON THIS WEBSITE

VIA THE COV-19 INJECTION AND/OR BECAUSE THEY KNOW I’M IN THE PROCESS OF GOING PUBLIC VERY SOON USES

DOJ

Arizona reportedly has “refurbished” its gas chamber and has spent more than $2,000 to acquire ingredients to execute prisoners with cyanide gas, the same gas used by the Nazis to murder more than one million men, women, and children during the Holocaust.

CHNA COLLECTS “HUMANITY” DNA VIA THE COVID SWAB AND OTHER “TEST(ANY AND ALL LAB TEST IN THE U.S. AND/OR GLOBALLY)TO INTO INTO A SUPERCOMPUTER(THE CHINESE GOVERNMENT forcibly collects biometric markers like fingerprints, facial images, and DNA of Xinjiang residents, where 12 million Uyghurs live)AND IS FORCIBLY COLLECTING “OUR” DNA WITH THE CORRPT GOVERNMENT HELP

CHINA COLLECTS MILLIONS OF BOYS DNA

CHINA WANTS YOU DNA AND MAY HAVE IT

BIDEN(OBAMA’S EXTENTION VIA OBAMACARE)CONSPIRES WITH CHINA IN VIOLATION OF NATIONAL SECURITY TO COLLECT “OUR” DNA(SEE BUSH – NOHIDE LAWS – BEHEADINGS, AND OBAMACARE CODE BEHEADING IN OBAMACARE HEALTH CARE LANGUAGE ON THIS WEBSITE)

TRUCKER CATCH U.S. GOVT. DESTROYING BABY FORMUA

https://www.bitchute.com/video/IcEkBEjjKsCG/

DARPHA REPLACE BABY FORMULA – WITH NANO TECH. FORMULA FROM EUROPE

https://www.theepochtimes.com/nestle-flying-baby-formula-to-us-from-europe-to-help-alleviate-shortages_4471741.html

nano-infant-formula-petition_57739Download

HITLER’S NAZI GERMANY “I.D. MARK” AS FOLLOWS:

BIDEN, HARRIS(AND PREDECESSOR FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUNG THRU TO PRESENT) ARE GUILTY OF TREASON.

NOTICE OF “RETROACTIVE” FORFEITURE OF OFFICE, PROPERTY AND ARREST WARRANTS, ALSO IT IS DECREED, ORDERED, AND ADJUDED THAT ALL EXECUTIVE ORDER OF GEORGE H. BUSH, WILLIAM BILL CLINTON, GEORGE W. BUSH, BARAK H. OBAMA, DONALD TRUMP AND JOE BIDEN FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT, CONSPIRED TO COMMIT OFFENSES AGAINST THE U.SA. CONSPIRED TO COMMIT TREASON AND/OR CONSPIRED TO DEFRAUD THE U.S.A. IT’S DEPARTMENT AND AGENCIES IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 371 AND ENGAGED IN A PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY. ALL “OFFICES” ARE FORFEITED ALL EXECUTIVE ORDER FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT ARE IS NULL AND VOID AND WITHOUT ANY LEGAL EFFECT, NOTICE OF RETROACTIVE ARREST WARRANTS FOR INTERNATIONAL “HEADS” OF STATE, UNITED NATION REPRESENTATIVE, WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION REPRESENTATIVE FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT!!

IT IS DECREED, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED THAT ALL WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION(ALL CONTRACTUAL RIGHTS), UNITED NATIONS – ORDERS, EMERGENCY ONE OR MORE COVID, MONKEY POX, “FLU” ETC. “HEALTH ORDERS” ARE NULL AND VOID AND WITHOUT ANY LEGAL EFFECT!!

MERRICK GARLAND CONSPIRED WITH ONE OR MORE JOE BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS, WILLLIAM BARR HIS PREDECESSOR, DONALD TRUMP AND/OR MIKE PENCE COMMITTED CRIMINAL ACTS

ALL CORRUPT!!

COMES NOW THE TWO WITNESSES STATE IN OPEN COURT, DECREE, ORDER, ADJUDGE(SENTENC THAT JOE BIDEN, DONALD TRUMP, MERRICK GARLAND ET AL IS GULITY OF TREASON IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S. Code § 2381 – Treason

FORFEITS ALL PROPERTY TO “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR AND BY OPERATION OF LAW FORFEITS PUBLIC OFFICE(SEE BELOW)

IN RE “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR

VS.

JOE BIDEN IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS U.S. PRESIDENT(CRIMINAL CLASS DEFENDANTS AND/OR RESPONDENT REPRESENTATIVE)THE WHITE HOUSE, U.S. CAPITOL BUILDING, THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, The Pentagon, “CRIMINAL” KAMALA HARRIS IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS VICE PRESIDENT “CRIMINAL” CLASS REPRESENTATIVE, MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL “CRIMINAL CLASS REPRESENTATIVE,

EXECUTIVE ORDER – TO DEFRAUD ALL U.S. CITIZENS OUT OF MONEY AND/PROPERTY FORCE U.S. CITIZENS INTO SLAVERY

on behalf of one or more

INCLUDE A LIST OF DEFENDANTS AND/OR RESPONDENTS HERE

https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2021/09/22/1039293816/covid-delta-variant-fda-commissioner

Food and Drug Adminstrator(FDA)Dr. Robert Califf  and/or Commissioner Stephen Hahn Hahn and FDA vaccine chief Peter Marks(and Predecessors from Jan. 1, 1993 and continuing thru to present)

The United States Federal Reserve, all Central Banks, all State Banks, Hayes Valley Limited Partnership, $1,000,000,000,000,000.00(Quadrillion )in currency(all currency including but not limited to all currency including the U.S. Dollar and/or Digital Dollar, the Chinese Yuan and/or digital yuan, Russian ruble and/or digital ruble, India rupee and/or digital rupee, etc. all cryptocurrency including but not limited to Bitcoin, USD Coin, King Charles III’s coin etc.) all tangible(including but not limited to The White House, The U.S. Department of Justice, The Department of Defense, The Supreme Court, The District Court of Columbia, The U.S. District Court of Appeals, All bank owned Real Estate[REO’s] Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac properties, McCormack Baron Salazar properties, SunAmerica Affordable Housing Partners properties etc. and intangible property(including but not limited to all types of Digital ledger Technology and/or Blockchains, Cern, ICANN, Petroleum, crude oil, fossil fuels, coal and natural gas, any and all contractual right affording a source of influence over an enterprise including but not limited to water rights via legal entitlement authorizing water to be diverted from a specified source, water, land, Papers, records, books, journals, ledgers, accounts, statements, memoranda, reports, invoices, work sheets, work papers, notes, transcriptions of notes, letters, correspondence, communications, abstracts, checks, diagrams, plans, blueprints, specifications, pictures, drawings, films, photographs, graphic representations, diaries, calendars, desk calendars, pocket calendars, lists, logs, publications, advertisements, press releases, facsimilies, newspapers, magazines, instructions, minutes, orders, bills, purchase orders, messages, resumes, summaries, for case, graphs, charts, appraisals, analytical records, reports, brochures, pamphlets, circulars, trade letters, agreements, contracts, letters of intent, telegrams, telexes, cables, recordings, audio tapes, magnetic tapes, visual tapes, transcripts of tapes or recordings, computer disks, tapes and cards, information stored in or accessible through computer or other information retrieval systems, including hard copies of electronic mail or information contained on computer hard drives, or any other writings or tangible or electronic things on which any handwriting, typing, printing, audio, visual, photographic or other forms of communication or information which are recorded or reproduced, goods and chattels, or credits and effects in the hands of garnishees to be named in the process ALL TANGIBLE AND INTANGLE PROPERTY, INCLUDING but not limited to intellectual property

• brands and logos
• product names
• inventions and products
• original software
• designs
• shape and appearance of a product
• music
• books
• poems
• paintings
• photography
• other kinds of creative work
•  ICANN

• patents
• trade marks
• copyright
• designs

NOTICE OF INTENT TO AMEND THIS WEBPAGE AND/OR CLAIM TO ADD ADDITIONAL DEFENDANTS AND/OR RESPONDENTS AVIA PRAECIPE TO JOIN ADDITIONAL “CRIMINAL” DEFENDANTS AND/OR RESPONDENTS

IN ADDITION

.

COMES NOW SHARON[DAVIS-ABUSALEM]BRIDGEWATER VIA “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PEOPLE OF THE 50 STATES(MY SON TWO VICTIMS AND FEDERAL WITNESSES INJURED AND DAMAGED IN BUSINESS, PERSON OR PROPERTY WITH FIRST HAND FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT(CONTINUAL VIOLENCE AND OPPRESSION, RENDERED DISABLED BY THEIR HEINOUS ACTS OR OMISSION FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING, RESTRAINED FROM INTERSTATE AND FOREIGN COMMERCE BY CORRUPT U.S. GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, INCLUDING BIDEN, HARRIS, ALL U.S. REPRESENTATIVE, ALL GOVERNORS, ETC.[A.K.A. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES] ACTING IN THEIR INDIVIDUAL WITH AN “INTERNATIONAL ADOLPH HITLER SATANIC BIOTERRORIST BIOLOGICAL WARFARE TERRORIST GROUP ENTERPRISE – RING -JACOB ROTHCHILD “LITERALLY” SATANIST, LUCIFERIAN, AND OWNER AND CONTROLLER OF MOST IF NOT ALL “GLOBAL” CENTRAL BANKS, ALL CURRENCIES, THE U.S. FEDERAL RESERVE ETC. TO DEFRAUD MY SON AND I, “TWO WITNESSES” OUT OF MONEY AND/OR PROPERTY WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW) ON BEHALF OF MY, SON, THE PEOPLE OF THE 50 STATES AND/OR HUMANITY VIA “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE 50 STATES AND/OR THE PEOPLE OF THE 50 STATES PURSUANT THE CORRUPT ORGANIZATION ACT(RICO)SEE BELOW FOR DEFINITION, TO U.S. GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS THE CORRAUTHORIZED REPRESENTIVE OF “THE 50 STATES AND/OR THE PEOPLE OF THE 50 PURSUANT TO TH CONTINUAL VIOLENCE AND OPPRESSION, RENDERED DISABLED BY THEIR HEINOUS ACTS OR OMISSION FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING TO JAN. 1, 2009 AND FURTHER CONTINUING THRU INTENTIONAL” CONTINUAL VIOLENCE AND OPPRESSION BY PRESENT)“INJURED AND DAMAGED IN BUSINESS, PERSON OR PROPERTY, RESTRAINED FROM INTERSTATE AND FOREIGN COMMERCE BY JACOB ROTHCHILD(SATAN’S REPRESENTATIVE “LITERALLY” RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CORONAVIRUS, HIV, ZIKA VIRUS, MONEY POX, TOMATO POX “LITERALLY” – SEE BELOW – PROOF” ) AND CO-CONSPIRATORS ONE OR MORE TRUMP, GARLAND, BIDEN, HARRIS, OBAMA “U.S. GOVERNMENT STATE ACTORS” CONTINUAL VIOLENCE AND OPPRESSION, RENDERED DISABLED BY THEIR HEINOUS ACTS OR OMISSION FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING TO JAN. 1, 2009 AND FURTHER CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT AND THRUINTENTIONAL” CONTINUAL VIOLENCE AND OPPRESSION AND THE RUNNING OF ANY STATUE OF LIMITATION TO ADMIRALTY AND/OR MARITIME CLAIMS AND/OR CRIMINAL PROSECUTION(ETC.)IS NOT TIME BARRED ANDWITH FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE LIMITATIONS IS TOLLED –

WITNESS WITH FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE AND STANDING, “THE ONLY TWO PEOPLE IN THE WORLD PERSON IN THE WORLD DENIED COURT ACCESS SINCE AUGUST 2008 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT, AUTHORIZE(SEE AFFIDAVIT – APPEARANCE AS COUNSEL FOR THE 50 STATES)AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE 50 STATES, AND/OR “INTERNATIONAL PROSECUTOR – AS IN INTERNATIONAL PROSECUTOR” AS IN INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT

RETAILATED AGAINST IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S. Code § 1513 (ON BEHALF OF MYSELF, MY SON, ALL U.S. CITIZENS – “PEOPLE OF THE 50 STATES”) THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY AND/OR RELATOR STANDING!! COMES NOW “THE UNITED STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR PURSUANT  28 U.S.C. § 1651, AND ISSUE WRITS NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE IN AID OF THIS ADMIRALTY AND/OR MARITIME TIME “COMMON LAW” ARREST WARRANTS, FORFEITURE, ETC.

(JACOB ROTHCHILD, “THE ROCKEFELLER’S AND THEIR ASSOCIATES ALL LIABLE FOR DAMAGES AND FORFEIT PROPERTY TO “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR” – SEE THE REST OF THIS WEBPAGE)

SEE BELOW DECLARATORY JUDGMENT, BI-LATERAL CLASS REPRESENTATIVES, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION, ARREST WARRANTS IN REM AND OTHER ADMIRALITY AND/OR MARITIME DOCUMENTS

PLAINTIFF/CLAIMANT INCORPORATES THE FOLLOWING EXH. A AS FULLY SET FORTH HEREIN

THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR NOTICE OF DEMAND(CLASS REPRESENTATIVES BIDEN, HARRIS AND/OR GARLAND(ON BEHALF OF ALL U.S. LEGlSLATORS, CONGRESSMAN AND/OR WOMEN, FOREIGN OFFICIALS AND MAJOR CORPORATION FROM JAN 1, 1993 THRU TO PRESENT)REFUSE TO PAY!!

        ADDITIONAL CRIMINAL INFORMATION

GOVERNMENT PARTICIPATES AS                    RICO(1961)(4)

  “Office of the United States President”, “ Office of the United States Attorney”   

               “Office of the U.S. Supreme Court Justices” “Office of U.S. Legislators and/or Congressman”

A line of cases hold that any governmental agency, court, political office or the like could serve as a RICO “enterprise.” United States v. Thompson, 685 F.2d 993, 999 (6th Cir. 1982)(en banc) cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1072 (1983). Among the government units that have been held to be “enterprises” are offices of governors and state legislators, courts, court clerks’ offices. See e.g., United States v. Stratton, 649 F.2d 1066, 1072-75 (5th Cir. 1981); United States v. Clark, 656 F.2d 1259, 1261-67 (8th Cir. 1981) Office of county judge); United States v. Frumento, 405 F. Supp. 23, 29-30 (E.D. Pa. 1975), affd, 563 F.2d 1083 (3d Cir. 1977). cert, debued, 434 U.S. 1072 (1978).

In referring to the RICO liability of government offices the court thought it inconceivable that “in considering the ever more widespread tentacles of organized crime in the nation’s economic life, Congress intended to ignore an important aspect of the economy [simply] because it was state operated and state controlled ….” (563 F.2d at 1091.) Accepting defendants’ contentions would mean that “business organizatons legitimately owned and operated by the states, even though their activities substantially affect interstate commerce, would be open game for racketeers. [The court refused] to believe that Congress had such ‘tunnel-vision’ when it enacted the racketeering statute or that it intended to exclude from the protective embrace of this broad statute, designed to curb organized crime, state operated commercial ventures engaged in interstate commerce, or other governmental agencies regulating commercial and utility operations affecting interstate commerce.”Decisions after Frumento expanded government activity to every conceivable government agency, court, or political office. United States v. Thompson, 669 F.2d 1143 (6th Cir), revd 685 F.2d 993 (6th Cir. 1982)(en banc), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1072 (1983) The Enterprize “OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY .” AND “US PRESIDENT” AND CONSTITUTE A LEGAL ENTERPRIZE  “OFFICE OF SUPREME COURT JUSTICE OR JUDICIAL OFFICE” LEGAL ENTEPRIZE AND ASSOCIATION“OFFICE OF ELECTIONS”

Series of Documented Acts Comprising the RICO Offenses

A criminal racketeering enterprise requires a minimum of two contiguous acts to meet the legal definition of a racketeering enterprise. Dozens of such contiguous acts are documented including but not limited to:

• Repeated cover-ups, from 1993 and continuing thru the filing of this complaint, by federal judges and State Judges of ongoing documented corruption in the government’s Office of the President(White House), Office of the Attorney .(Department of Justice),[law enforcement agencies in California, Georgia, Michigan] Office of HUD(The Department of HUD), “other US Governnent Agencies,” that enabled to occur a series of major fraud on the United States which is the direct and proximate cause of the financial economic collapse −including but not limited to US Government joint participaton with Contractors fraud, Corporations , Partnerships, lawyers fraud , (under the Biden(Harris) adminitrationand Obama Bush[Iraq War],Clinton Adminstration)
• War Crimes, Crimes against Humanity, Repeated Terrorist Attacks, Repeated cover-ups of the criminal activities in overt and covert government operations that the Plaintiffs(the original source)discovered while a public housing facility.   
• The evidence of repeated conduct constituting “continual”obstruction of justice that they knew would continue to result in great harm to the two witnesses, U.S. Citizens and/or American people , the US Government, the US Treasury and to national security.
• The evidence of repeated felony retaliation against Whistleblowers such as the Plaintiff Sharon Bridgewater, and other Whistleblowers in the “Fast and furious,” “Benhi Scandle” etc. for attempting to report high-level crimes against the United States and to criminally halt ability to report such crimes.
• The corrupt, illegal and unconstitutional seizure of the Plaintiff business and personal property to restrain commerce knowingly it would cause great harm and impair the Plaintiff ability to conduct commerce.
• The corrupt, illegal, extortion and money laundering of US public housing tenants
• The IRS corrupt, illegal and unconstitutional targeting of tea party members.
•  The illegal, unconstitutional “amendment” to our US Constitution right that violate US Citizens right to bear arms and/or our right to freedom of religion.
• The corrupt, illegal and unconstitutional seizure of the AP Phone Records, violation of the “press”  first amendment US Constitutional right. 
• The  unconstitutional mandate of Obamacare.
• Converting the courts, and their judicial positions, into a racketeering enterprise.
• Perpetrating a series of predicate acts, that far exceeded the legal criteria for being a criminal racketeering enterprise.
• Each of these criminal acts were compounded by the fact that they were perpetrated by people in positions of trust, who were paid to enforce the law.
• Expanding on the number of parties involved in the series of predicate acts were the unknown−but suspected−Eric Holder and the U.S. Department of Justice−(and his predesors)parties that were orchestrating the multiple schemes and conspiracies and protecting each of the criminal acts of each and every one.
• Several US Senators and Congressman, confirming Todd Jones ATF director when they knew and were aware of a criminal pending investigation, and schemes to defraud the USA.

                                RICO Details

A criminal RICO racketeering organiztion crime requires:

• Two or more related predicate acts, in a conspiracy. Predicate offenses are related if they have (a) the same or similar purposes, (b) results, (c) participants, (c) victims, or (d) methods of commission.
  
  1. Same purposes. The participants’ purpose was to defraud the two witnesses out of money and/or property without due process of law, use trick, scheme, deception, money and/or property and/or the intangle right to honest services, “inflict” extreme emotional distress on the Plaintiffs and/or Petitioners and/or other Whistleblowers(such as in Swartz case)to block Sharon Bridgewater and/or James and other “COV-19 vaccine -injection”and other Whistleblowers, the press from reporting a continuing series of corrupt, with corporations, and criminal acts of public officials  joint participation with Corporations, individuals, to defraud the USA  involving key people in government.
      
  2. Results. The results included hindering and halting Sharon Bridgewaters and/or other Whistleblowers and/or the press from reporting the crime and/or  ability to properly report, publicize, and halt the ongoing corruption and conspiracy to defraud the USA.
      
  3. Participants. The participants included the repeated acts by the same people and groups, public officials including US Presidents, federal judges, Justice Department employees, lawyers, California, Michigan and judges and others acting in joint participation with each other.
      
  4. Victims. The victims included:
     
     • Repeated harm to The United States of America agenSharon Bridgewater et al, other Whistleblowers,  and US Citizens(the USA) and/or the press.  The harm consisted of seizing the Plaitniffs personal and business assets, depriving the Plaintifff Sharon Bridgewater and/or . the right to conduct commerce; depriving the Plaintiff and/or US Citizens and/or Whistleblower through a series of unlawful and unconstitutional judicial the rights and protections guaranteed to all citizens by the laws and constitution of the United States and/or the ability of IRS official to collect taxes, and/or the ability of the Plaintiffs, Whistleblowers and/or the Press to exercise their 1^st US Constitutonal amendment right to free speech.  
     • People of the United States who were harmed by the series of criminal acts and the documents actions of federal judges, Justice Public Officials, Department ofthememployees et al, and others, that enabled the crimes and resulting harm to continue.
        
  5. Method of commission. As it relates to the current and/or former presidents, public officials, federal judges and Justice Department participants, they perpetrated a series of acts including (a) failing to report the crime to congressional members and/or the US Government Oversight Committee members(b)labeling the Plaintiffs as a vexatious ligation (c)gross prosecutial misconduct(d)acts of violence against Whistleblower for attempting to report the ongoing crimes against the United States etc.(e)failing to change IRS tax laws.

• The racketeering acts were related, the intent being to halt the reporting and publicizing of high-level criminal activities.
   
• Their actions consisted of a continuing pattern of criminal activities.
   
• All of the actions were continuing, from 1993 thru the filing of this complaint, and arguably continuing as judicial orders still exist in several federal courts attempting to bar the Plaintiff Sharon Bridgewater and/or Whistleblowers and/or the Press from filing any papers in any federal district or appellate court. These orders knowingly obstructed justice by blocking the Plaintiff Sharon Bridgewater et al from reporting major and deadly criminal activities against the United States; and blocked the Sharon Bridgewater, Whistleblowers et al from exercising federal defenses against the pattern of civil and constitutional, and criminal acts for which they are federal causes of actions for which federal defenses exist.
   
• The predicate acts and conspiracy gravely affected interstate commerce, and caused, or enabled to occur, a continuing series of major fraud against the USA and/or the Plaintiff which is thedirect and proximate cause of the financial ecomomic collapse and also affects interstate commerce through criminal activities in the US Government of public officials, abuse of US Government power, committing criminal acts of bribery, corruption, and for pand acting outside their scope of authority and in their individual capacities.

      RICO REQUIRES NO MORE THAN 

      SLIGHT EFFECT UPON INTERSTATE COMMERCE

              The Plaintiffs was damaged or injured in business or property.     RICO Requires no more than a slight effect upon interstate commerce. United States v. Doherty, 867 F.2d 47, 68 (1st Cir. 1989). United States v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1531 (7th Cir. 1985). cert. denied, 106 S.Ct. 1188 (1986).Predicate acts were related to the common purpose of the enterprise, defraud US taxpayers, Consumers, and/or Class Plainitff and being to halt Sharon Bridgewater and other Whistleblowers and/or the press from reporting and publicizing the ongoing criminal activities. See United States v. Bonanno Organized Crime Family, 683 F. Supp. 1411, 1437 (E.D.N.Y. 1988).    All aided,  abetted, counseled, commanded, induced or procured to defraud the US, taxpayers, and/or the Class Plaintiff and/or commit predicate acts as defined in 18 USC section 1961(5) and further Eric Holder and Obama obstructed justice.    Further, Congress limited the force of Rule 8(b) by loosening the statutory requirements for what constitutes joint criminal activities. United States v. Friedman, 854 F.2d 535, 561 (2d Cir. 1988); United States v. Castellano, 610 F.Supp. 1359, 1396 (S.D.N.Y. 1985). If a defendant is not named in a conspiracy or RICO count, he may be charged in a separate court, in the same indictment, if he is alleged to have participated in the same series of acts or transactions that constituted the conspiracy or RICO offense.   Further as far as the RICO enterprize,  some benefited from the enterprise, and some did not. The racketeering activity is not required to benefit the enterprise.  (The participants in the scheme are not required to have personally profited, though some did.  United States v. Killip, 819 F.2d 1542, 1`549 (10th Cir. 1987. )

Some defendants agreed to join conspiracy with knowledge that other members were to commit at least two acts of racketeering. United States v. Leisure, 844 F.2d 1347, 1367 (8th Cir. 1988). See ‘ 1962(d), defendant agreed to join conspiracy with knowledge that other members were to commit at least two acts of racketeering.

In  Shearin v. E.F. Hutton Group, Inc., 885 F.2d 1162 (3d Cir. 1989). The court held that Shearin, a pro se plaintiff, could recover for being fired, if she proved that it was an overt act in furtherance of an alleged ‘ 1962(d) conspiracy to bilk Hutton customers for trust services which were never performed. In Sedima the court noted that standing to sue under ” 1962(a)──(c) is based on proof that the predicate racketeering acts caused injury to plaintiff’s business or property. 473 U.S. at 495. The court also held that Sedina did not foreclose the possibility that harm arising from a conspiratorial overt act, distinct from the predicate acts listed in ‘ 1961(1), could confer standing under ‘ 1962(d). 885 F.2d at 1169-70.

Defendant was aware of the “essential nature” of the enterprise, which was a group of persons associated for the purpose of luring people into rigged card games. United States v. Joseph, 835 F.2d 1149, 1152 (6th Cir. 1987); in United States v. Gallo, 667 F. Supp. 1359, 1401, (S.D.N.Y. 1985), the defendant must have knowledge of the enterprise and at least some of its criminal activities; Defendant must have been aware of at least the . existence of the enterprise (United States v. Castellano, 610 F.Supp. 1359, 1401 (E.D.N.Y. 1985); in order to prove RICO conspiracy count government must show the existence of a “unified agreement to participate in the affairs of the enterprise through a pattern of racketeering ….”

The court held that § 1962(c) does not require concerted criminal activity, only that an individual commit at least two acts of racketeering while participating in the conduct of an enterprise. United States v. Castallano, 610 F.Supp. 1359, 1392-1396 (S.D.N.Y. 1985). Id at 1394.

RICO Violations Involving A
 Continuing Series of ATTACK ON THE PLAINTIFFS AND OTHER WHISTLEBLOWERS

Dozens of separate predicate acts were perpetrated to block Sharon Bridgewater and/or Whistleblowers and/or the press from reporting ongoing criminal activities in high-level overt and covert operations involving government employees. That constituted claims under ‘ 1962(a),(b), (c), and (d), in factual allegations.

     1. RICO violators within the Office of the President, Office of the Attorney ., Office of HUD, et al conspired with each other  to halt the former Sharon Bridgewater and/or other Whistleblowers, “ the press” to disclose their major fraud, and/or to inflict economic hardship on the Plaintiff, restrain commerce, cause the Plaintiff suffering, and prevent the Plaintff from carrying out her responsibilities to report the crimes, all while all were either operating, directly or managing federal funds, and or  Offices of the US Government. 

• All Aided and abetted the repeated massive RICO violations and violated the Plaintiff civil right repeatedly.
•  Federal judges as RICO violators, entered the conspiracy, and continued actively from 2008 and continuing thru the filing of this complaint.  Their predicate acts included:

• Repeatedly blocking the Sharon Bridgewater complaint to halt the ability of the Plainiff to report the crime
• Entering a vexatious ligatant order
• Vacacating settlement conferences.
• Issued a series of unlawful and unconstitutional orders, with criminal intent, to halt the Plaintiffs ability to report the crimes.
• Corruptly, through violation of federal laws and constitutional protections, defrauded the USA in amounts in excess of 50(fifty) trillion dollars and knew and were aware ththey did not have the authority to schme and defraud, the USA. 
• Lawyers as RICO participants, aided, abetted the these corporations, partnerships, President and corporations, et al engaged in a series of unlawful  lawsuits from 1993 and thru the filing of this complaint, that violated blocks of state and federal laws and constitutional protections, that required the corrupt cooperation of Federal judges and federal judges.
   

 

ROTHCHILD AND CO-CONSPIRATORS, BIDEN(AND PREDECESSORS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 THRU TO PRESENT)INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGES, COMMITTED WIRE FRAUD, MAIL FRAUD LAUNDER MONEY THRU ALL CENTRAL BANKS AND/OR THE FEDERAL RESERVE, THE WHITE HOUSE, THE U.S. CAPITOL BUILDING IN WASHINGTON D.C. U.S. DEFENSE DEPARTMENT, CDC ETC.(REAL PROPERTY) ALL WERE involved in a transaction or attempted transaction in violation of section 1956, 1957 or 1960 of this title, or any property traceable to such property.

ALL COMMITTED CRIMES OF COVID – 19 BIOLOGICAL WARFARE, (B) Any property, real or personal, within the jurisdiction of the United States, constituting, derived from, or traceable to, any proceeds obtained directly or indirectly from an offense against a foreign nation, or any property used to facilitate such an offense, if the offense— (i) involves trafficking in nuclear, chemical, biological, or radiological weapons technology or material, or the manufacture, importation, sale, or distribution of a controlled substance (as that term is defined for purposes of the Controlled Substances Act), or any other conduct described in section 1956 (c)(7)(B);

(ii) would be punishable within the jurisdiction of the foreign nation by death or imprisonment for a term exceeding 1 year; and

(iii) would be punishable under the laws of the United States by imprisonment for a term exceeding 1 year, if the act or activity constituting the offense had occurred within the jurisdiction of the United States.

ALL REAL property, real or personal, which constitutes or is derived from proceeds traceable to a violation of section 215, 471, 472, 473, 474, 476, 477, 478, 479, 480, 481, 485, 486, 487, 488, 501, 502, 510, 542, 545, 656, 657, 670, 842, 844, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1014, 1028, 1029, 1030, 1032, or 1344 of this title or any offense constituting “specified unlawful activity” (as defined in section 1956 (c)(7) of this title), or a conspiracy to commit such offense.

(D) Any property, real or personal, which represents or is traceable to the gross receipts obtained, directly or indirectly, from a violation of— (i) section 666 (a)(1) (relating to Federal program fraud);

(ii) section 1001 (relating to fraud and false statements);

(iii) section 1031 (relating to major fraud against the United States);

(iv) section 1032 (relating to concealment of assets from conservator or receiver of insured financial institution);

(v) section 1341 (relating to mail fraud); or

(vi) section 1343 (relating to wire fraud),

if such violation relates to the sale of assets acquired or held by the the  [1] Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as conservator or receiver for a financial institution, or any other conservator for a financial institution appointed by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency or the National Credit Union Administration, as conservator or liquidating agent for a financial institution.

(E) With respect to an offense listed in subsection (a)(1)(D) committed for the purpose of executing or attempting to execute any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent statements, pretenses, representations or promises, the gross receipts of such an offense shall include all property, real or personal, tangible or intangible, which thereby is obtained, directly or indirectly.

(F) Any property, real or personal, which represents or is traceable to the gross proceeds obtained, directly or indirectly, from a violation of— (i) section 511 (altering or removing motor vehicle identification numbers);

(ii) section 553 (importing or exporting stolen motor vehicles);

(iii) section 2119 (armed robbery of automobiles);

(iv) section 2312 (transporting stolen motor vehicles in interstate commerce); or

(v) section 2313 (possessing or selling a stolen motor vehicle that has moved in interstate commerce).

(G) All assets, foreign or domestic— (i) of any individual, entity, or organization engaged in planning or perpetrating any any  [1] Federal crime of terrorism (as defined in section 2332b (g)(5)) against the United States, citizens or residents of the United States, or their property, and all assets, foreign or domestic, affording any person a source of influence over any such entity or organization;

(ii) acquired or maintained by any person with the intent and for the purpose of supporting, planning, conducting, or concealing any Federal crime of terrorism (as defined in section 2332b (g)(5)  [2] against the United States, citizens or residents of the United States, or their property;

(iii) derived from, involved in, or used or intended to be used to commit any Federal crime of terrorism (as defined in section 2332b (g)(5)) against the United States, citizens or residents of the United States, or their property; or

(iv) of any individual, entity, or organization engaged in planning or perpetrating any act of international terrorism (as defined in section 2331) against any international organization (as defined in section 209 of the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 (22 U.S.C. 4309 (b)) or against any foreign Government. [3] Where the property sought for forfeiture is located beyond the territorial boundaries of the United States, an act in furtherance of such planning or perpetration must have occurred within the jurisdiction of the United States. (H) Any property, real or personal, involved in a violation or attempted violation, or which constitutes or is derived from proceeds traceable to a violation, of section 2339C of this title.

(2) For purposes of paragraph (1), the term “proceeds” is defined as follows: (A) In cases involving illegal goods, illegal services, unlawful activities, and telemarketing and health care fraud schemes, the term “proceeds” means property of any kind obtained directly or indirectly, as the result of the commission of the offense giving rise to forfeiture, and any property traceable thereto, and is not limited to the net gain or profit realized from the offense.

(B) In cases involving lawful goods or lawful services that are sold or provided in an illegal manner, the term “proceeds” means the amount of money acquired through the illegal transactions resulting in the forfeiture, less the direct costs incurred in providing the goods or services. The claimant shall have the burden of proof with respect to the issue of direct costs. The direct costs shall not include any part of the overhead expenses of the entity providing the goods or services, or any part of the income ta

ALL IS FORFEITED TO SHARON[DAVIS- ABUSALEM]BRIDGEWATER VIA “THE 50 STATES EX REL PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR

The evidence showed a nexus between the racketeering activities and the enterprise, the goal of which was to overthrow the US Constitution, deprive and/or denied the Plaintiffs rights as secured by international and/or nation treaties(the US Constituion), and defraud US Taxpayers, Consumer the intangle right to honest services and overthrow the US Govenrment prevent the Class Plaintiffs and/or Petitioners from reporting and exposure of a continuing pattern of corrupt and criminal activities that were inflicting, and would continue to inflict, great harm upon the United States.

has___ been generally damaged in the sum of $____.

 2) in deliberate ignorance; or

(3) in reckless disregard and submitted claims to the US Treasury for the years of 2010(3.4 Trillion), 2011(3.6 Trillion), 2012(3.5 Trillion), 2013(3.4 Trillion), 2014(3.5 Trillion),   2015(3.6 Trillion) 2016(3.9 Trillion), AND 2017(4.1 Trillion)(US budget for these years can be verfied at www:_____________)which constitute a false claims under the Federal False Claims act, in the amount of $84,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00(EIGHTY FOUR TRILLION DOLLARS)that such claims are false, and are liable under the False Claims Act therefor. By virtue of these acts Obama _____as representative on behalf of class ____________ in the amount of $_______________, the amount is due and now owing.  Wherefore the Plaintiff request judgment in the amount of $_________________and writs of attachments. 

FORMAL CRIMINAL CHARGES

CLAIM # I

joe biden in his officia capacity as presidentBARAK H. OBAMA[AKA BARRY SOERTOES]IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS PRESIDENT ON BEHALF OF ALL CLASS DEFENDANTS UNCOVERED US TREASURY  PAYMENTS AND/OR MEDICADE PAYMENT

PLAINTIFF RE-ALLEGE THE ABOVE.  On or about 2009 and continuing thru present , BARAK H. OBAMA[AKA BARRY SOERTOES]IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS PRESIDENT ON BEHALF OF ALL CLASS DEFENDANTS CONCEALED KNOWN FACTS RETAILATED AGAINST THE PLAINTIFF WHISTLEBLOWERS

Defendant Barak H.Obama[AKA Barry Soertoes] in his official capacity as [Predessors] IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS PRESIDENT ON BEHALF OF ALL CLASS DEFENDANTS and Loretta Lynch in her official capacity, Planned Parenthood, The Federal Reserve, “Class Defendants” and each of them knowingly and willfully conspired and agreed among themselves to engage in  activities of which affect, interstate or foreign commerce and to conduct or participate, directly or indirectly, in the conduct of such enterprise’s affairs through a pattern of racketeering activity or collection of unlawful debt advocate and overthrow our constitutional form of Government, breach contracts and international treaties, commit war crimes, commit human rights violations, defraud the United States and submit false claims, support legislation, conspired, aided and abetted Planned Partnerhood to perform abortions, concealed known facts that they were selling fetal tissue and organ of aborted babies on the black market national and/or international for profit and launder  money thru bank(owned and operated by the Federal Reserve), discriminate against the Plaintiff Whistleblowers had a fiduary relationship with Barak H. Obama and was discriminated against based on race, class and/or disability, retaliated against, kidnapped, committed human rights violations,  assaulted by Obama acts or omissions.  knowing that such claims to medicade and/or US Treasury would be submitted to the US Treasury for employed by or associated with any enterprise

Defendant “Class Members,”  and each of them did the acts and things herein alleged pursuant to, and in furtherance of, the conspiracy and above-alleged agreement. Defendant class member adopted the acts, committed securities fraud,  ___ , furthered the conspiracy by cooperation with [—or— lent aid and encouragement to—-or—ratified and adopted the acts of—-] defendants, ____ in that _______.

1.

2..

<>. As a proximate result of the wrongful acts herein alleged plaintiff___ has___ been generally damaged in the sum of $____.

 2) in deliberate ignorance; or

(3) in reckless disregard and submitted claims to the US Treasury for the years of 2010(3.4 Trillion), 2011(3.6 Trillion), 2012(3.5 Trillion), 2013(3.4 Trillion), 2014(3.5 Trillion),   2015(3.6 Trillion) 2016(3.9 Trillion), AND 2017(4.1 Trillion)(US budget for these years can be verfied at www:_____________)which constitute a false claims under the Federal False Claims act, in the amount of $84,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00(EIGHTY FOUR TRILLION DOLLARS)that such claims are false, and are liable under the False Claims Act therefor. By virtue of these acts Obama _____as representative on behalf of class ____________ in the amount of $_______________, the amount is due and now owing.  Wherefore the Plaintiff request judgment in the amount of $_________________and writs of attachments. 

                          

COMES NOW THE THE STATE of Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming[the District of Columbia, the Common wealth of Puerto Rico, The US Virgin Island, Guam, theNorthern Marianna Islands, the American Samoa] EX REL Sharon Bridgewater (A.K.A. Sharon Abusalem, Sharon Davis) Private Attorney General and RELATOR[ FROM 1993 and continuing thru present]-  Real parties in interest  the undersigned complaintant says makes the following  affirmation under the penalties of perjury, and being duly sworn state the following is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.and that On or about 1785 and continuing thru present and further contining thru present the upon information and belief, the following Federal and/or State crimes did take place in the County of the District of Columbia, Washington D.C., in the County of Gwinnett, State of Georgia, in the County of Dekalb, State of Georgia, in the County of Fulton, State of Georgia, in the County of Oakland, State of California, in the  County of San Francisco, State of California, in the  County of Washtenaw, State of Michigan and “unknown” cities or towns in the State of Georgia, State of California, State of California, and/or Michigan, and in the  County of Wayne, State of Michigan and in the State of California, and/or the “50 States” in “unknown” cities or Towns, and/or in the  District of Columbia and/or in the contininial of United States, complains, alleges and appearing before a Federal Judge of the United States, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4, to report these crimes FORMALLY CHARGE

COUNT III

                   CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT TREASON

                                         by levying war against the USA

by adhering to their enemies,

giving those enemies aid and comfort

within the USA and elsewhere

Beginning on or about Jan. 1, 1993 and continuing thru the filing of this complaint within the District of Columbia and else in the US and/or intentionally, did unlawfully, willfully and knowingly combined, conspire together and with each other, came to the meeting of the minds, entered into an unlawful agreement and/or came to a mutual understanding to  accomplish a common and unlawful plan, namely to engage in a “pattern of racketeering activity” to commit_list predicate acts(violate a, b,c) and knowingly and willfully became a member of such conspiracy and futher, at the time, joined such conspiracy, he or she or they did so with the specific intent either to personally engage in at least two incidents of racketeering, as alleged in the Information,______________________ or he or she or they specifically intended to otherwise participate in the affairs of the “enterprise” with the knowledge and intent that other members of the conspiracy would engage in at least two incidents of racketeering, ______________________as alleged in the Information, as part of a “pattern of racketeering act or became a member without full  knowledge of of all of the details of the unlawful scheme but has an understanding of the unlawful nature of a plan and knowingly and willfully joins in that plan on one occasion, and played a minor part. In the unlawful scheme.

                                                             Conspiracy to

COUNT THREE:  Conspiracy to violate 18 U.S.C. 2381

Conspircy to commit treason by levying war against the USA

by adhering to their enemies,

giving those enemies aid and comfort

within the USA and elsewhere

(multiple violations as a principal)

Beginning on or about Jan. 1, 1993 and/or on or about _______ continuing thru the filing of this complaint within the District of Columbia and else in the US and/or international, AKA Queen Elizabeth and/or Charles, did unlawfully, willfully and knowingly combined, conspire together and with each other, and to commit commit multiple federal felonies by levying war against the several States and by adhering to their enemies, giving those enemies aid and comfort within three States of the Union and elsewhere, all in connection with the deaths

                                                                    TREASON

18 U.S. Code § 2339B – Providing material support or resources to designated foreign terrorist organizations

COUNT SIX:  18 U.S.C.

                                         CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT TREASON

COUNT SIX:  18 U.S.C.

                                      Aiding and Abetting Engaging in a Monetary                                    

                    Transaction in Property Derived from Specified Unlawful Activity

COUNT SIX:  18 U.S.C.286

                                     Conspiracy to Defraud the United States Government

                                                            With Respect to Claims 

From in or about 1993 through the present in Fairfax County, Virginia, and elsewhere in Virginia, in the District of Columbia, and Washington, D.C., defendants Barak H. Obama, Eric Holder,Shawn Dovanan, Kathleen Sebious _________, entered into a conspiracy to obtain payment; allowance; aid in obtainingpayment of claims against the United States Department of Treasury,a department of the United States, its Departments, programs or agencies for H defendant,____________________,

a resident of ____________________, made and presented to theUnited States Treasury Department a claim against the United States for payment, which he [she]knew to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent, by [e.g., preparing a budget and causing to be prepared a budget andfiling and causing to be filed, what purported to be a budget to operate the USA, which waspresented to the United States Treasury Department, through the Internal Revenue Service,wherein he [she] claimed [e.g., a refund of taxes]2 in the amount of $_____(Trillion of Dollars) knowing that claim to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent in violation of  18 U.S.C.286.

COUNT SIX:  18 U.S.C.287

                                                                   False Claim

From in or about ___________, 20__ in Fairfax County, Virginia, and elsewhere in Virginia, in the District of Columbia, and/or  Washington, D.C., defendants Barak H. Obama, _________, a resident of  the USA, and/or District of Columbia made and presented to theUnited States Treasury Department a claim against the United States for payment, which he he knew to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent by preparing  and/or causing to be prepared and submitting a budget what purported to be for to operate the Department of Justice which was presented to the United States Treasury Department of Treasury through the (?)US Congress, taxpayers, ______________¹ to deprive undersign counsel of his right to access to an impartial jury trial pursuant to civil RICO and 18 U.S.C. § 1983, as well as to an impartial court under the Federal Tort Claims Act, so to obstruct and cover-up the violations of federal statutory fathers’ rights to compel the extortion____ wherein he was not qualified to hold office and claimed to the right to hold office as US president and/or claimed to be a qualified individual to authorize to spend  [e.g., a refund of taxes]2 in the amount of $__________, knowing that claim to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent.defendant,____________________,

a resident of ____________________, made and presented to theUnited States Treasury Department a claim against the United States for payment, which he [she]knew to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent in violation of  18 U.S.C.287.

COUNT SIX:  18 U.S.C.287

                                                                   False Claim

From in or about ___________, 20__ in Fairfax County, Virginia, and elsewhere in Virginia, in the District of Columbia, and/or  Washington, D.C., defendants Eric Holder, _________, a resident of  the USA, and/or District of Columbia made and presented to theUnited States Treasury Department a claim against the United States for payment, which he he knew to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent by preparing  and/or causing to be prepared and submitting a budget what purported to be for to operate the Department of Justice which was presented to the United States Treasury Department of Treasury through the (?)US Congress, taxpayers, ______________¹ to deprive undersign counsel of his right to access to an impartial jury trial pursuant to civil RICO and 18 U.S.C. § 1983, as well as to an impartial court under the Federal Tort Claims Act, so to obstruct and cover-up the violations of federal statutory fathers’ rights to compel the extortion____ wherein he was not qualified to hold office and claimed to the right to hold office as US president and/or claimed to be a qualified individual to authorize to spend  [e.g., a refund of taxes]2 in the amount of $__________, knowing that claim to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent.defendant,____________________,

a resident of ____________________, made and presented to theUnited States Treasury Department a claim against the United States for payment, which he [she]knew to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent in violation of  18 U.S.C.287.  

SIX:  18 U.S.C.287

                                                                   False Claim

From in or about ___________, 20__ in Fairfax County, Virginia, and elsewhere in Virginia, in the District of Columbia, and/or  Washington, D.C., defendants Shawn Donavan, _________, a resident of  the USA, and/or District of Columbia made and presented to theUnited States Treasury Department a claim against the United States for payment, which he he knew to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent by preparing  and/or causing to be prepared and submitting a budget what purported to be for to operate the Department of Justice which was presented to the United States Treasury Department of Treasury through the (?)US Congress, taxpayers, ______________¹ to deprive undersign counsel of his right to access to an impartial jury trial pursuant to civil RICO and 18 U.S.C. § 1983, as well as to an impartial court under the Federal Tort Claims Act, so to obstruct and cover-up the violations of federal statutory fathers’ rights to compel the extortion____ wherein he was not qualified to hold office and claimed to the right to hold office as US president and/or claimed to be a qualified individual to authorize to spend  [e.g., a refund of taxes]2 in the amount of $__________, knowing that claim to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent.defendant,____________________,

a resident of ____________________, made and presented to theUnited States Treasury Department a claim against the United States for payment, which he [she]knew to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent  in violation of  18 U.S.C.287  

COUNT SIX:  18 U.S.C.287

                                                                   False Claim

From in or about ___________, 20__ in Fairfax County, Virginia, and elsewhere in Virginia, in the District of Columbia, and/or  Washington, D.C., defendants Eric Kathleen Sebibus, _________, a resident of  the USA, and/or District of Columbia made and presented to theUnited States Treasury Department a claim against the United States for payment, which he he knew to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent by preparing  and/or causing to be prepared and submitting a budget what purported to be for to operate the Department of Justice which was presented to the United States Treasury Department of Treasury through the (?)US Congress, taxpayers, ______________¹ to deprive undersign counsel of his right to access to an impartial jury trial pursuant to civil RICO and 18 U.S.C. § 1983, as well as to an impartial court under the Federal Tort Claims Act, so to obstruct and cover-up the violations of federal statutory fathers’ rights to compel the extortion____ wherein he was not qualified to hold office and claimed to the right to hold office as US president and/or claimed to be a qualified individual to authorize to spend  [e.g., a refund of taxes]2 in the amount of $__________, knowing that claim to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent.defendant,____________________,

a resident of ____________________, made and presented to theUnited States Treasury Department a claim against the United States for payment, which he [she]knew to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent in violation of  18 U.S.C.287  

COUNT SIX:  18 U.S.C.287

                                                                   False Claim

From in or about ___________, 20__ in Fairfax County, Virginia, and elsewhere in Virginia, in the District of Columbia, and/or  Washington, D.C., defendants Hillary Clinton, _________, a resident of  the USA, and/or District of Columbia made and presented to theUnited States Treasury Department a claim against the United States for payment, which she knew to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent by preparing  and/or causing to be prepared and submitting a budget what purported to be for to operate the Department of State which was presented to the United States Treasury Department of Treasury through the (?)US Congress, taxpayers, ______________¹ to deprive undersign counsel of his right to access to an impartial jury trial pursuant to civil RICO and 18 U.S.C. § 1983, as well as to an impartial court under the Federal Tort Claims Act, so to obstruct and cover-up the violations of federal statutory fathers’ rights to compel the extortion____ wherein he was not qualified to hold office and claimed to the right to hold office as US president and/or claimed to be a qualified individual to authorize to spend  [e.g., a refund of taxes]2 in the amount of $__________, knowing that claim to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent.defendant,____________________, a resident of ____________________, made and presented to theUnited States Treasury Department a claim against the United States for payment, which he [she]knew to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent in violation of  18 U.S.C.287

COUNT SIX:  18 U.S.C.287

                                                                   False Claim

From in or about ___________, 20__ in Fairfax County, Virginia, and elsewhere in Virginia, in the District of Columbia, and/or  Washington, D.C., defendants Michelle Obama, _________, a resident of  the USA, and/or District of Columbia made and presented to theUnited States Treasury Department a claim against the United States for payment, which she knew to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent, by preparing and/or submitting and/or causing to be filed with “White house Travel” what purported to be listed two daughters _____ as “white house staff members” waspresented to the United States Treasury Department, through the Travel Office of the White house, wherein  she claimed and/or defrauded the United States Treasury in the amount of $__________, knowing thatclaim to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent in violation of  18 U.S.C.287

COUNT SIX:  18 U.S.C.371

From in or about ___________, 20__ in Fairfax County, Virginia, and elsewhere in Virginia, in the District of Columbia, and/or  Washington, D.C., defendants Michelle Obama, _________, a resident of  the USA, and/or District of Columbia made and presented to theUnited States Treasury Department a claim against the United States for payment, which she knew to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent, by preparing and/or submitting and/or causing to be filed with “White house Travel” what purported to be listed two daughters _____ as “white house staff members” waspresented to the United States Treasury Department, through the Travel Office of the White house, wherein  she claimed and/or defrauded the United States Treasury in the amount of $__________, knowing thatclaim to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent in violation of  18 U.S.C.287.

CLAIM IV

BREACH OF CONTRACT AGAINST  THE PUBLIC/PRIVATE “TRANSNATIONAL”

By reason of defendant Loretta Lynch breach of said contract and/or negligence as herein alleged, the plaintiff “the United States et al and/or the “Class Petitioner Representative Bridgewater and/or Class Member  has suffered damages in the sum of not less than and not less than 100,000,000,000,000,000(One Hunred Trillion Dollars-class Defendants).

By the terms of said written agreement, the Plaintiff is entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees incurred in the enforcement of the provisions of the agreement. By reason of the aforementioned breach of the defendant Loretta Lynch, the Plaintiff has been forced to “ACT AS PROSECUTOR, TO DEFEND FOR THE UNITED STATES, ET AL,” to collect fines, etc. ) and to  recover money and/or property on behalf of the “ United 50 States et al.”    Further on or about Nov. 15, 2015 and continuing thru present the Petitioner has sent Loretta Lynch “duly authorized, first class certified mail,” and a number of times since then, plaintiff  Bridgewater has demanded Loretta Lynch in her official capacity to  stop her wrongful conduct described above. Defendants Loretta Lynch as the United States Attorney General et al , and each of them, have refused and still refuse to refrain from their wrongful conduct.

             Defendants Loretta Lynch in her official capacity unless and until enjoined and restrained by order of this court, will cause great and irreparable injury to “the United States et al ,” in that “the United 50 States and/or the Plaintiff will suffer and continue to suffer from deprivation of property and/or money without due process of law in violaton of the United  Constitution and/or International laws and treaties.The enterprise “federal officials” joint participation has  changed, or altered the movement or ransportation or flow of goods, merchandise, money, or other property between or mong two or more states (between a state and a foreign country).Nature of Trade and Commerce; Real Estate .Holder acted or refused to act on ground generally applicable to the Class

By the aforesaid acts and omissions Defendants caused the damage and _____The United States performed all of its contractual obligations pertaining to the payment via the job of the United States President and/or the United States Attorney General “all officer shall uphold the United States Constitution, ___________faithfully ________, Loretta Lynch prosecute

As a result of the aforesaid acts and omissions, Defendants breached its contractual obligation by failing to perform work as the United States President and the United Statea Attorney General., as a consequence of which the United States is entitled to money damaged in the amount ________

<>. On or about ___, 19__, in the City of ___, County of ___, State of California, Plaintiff and defendant entered into a written agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and made a part hereof. By the terms of said written agreement, ___.

The consideration set forth in the agreement was the fair and reasonable.Plaintiff has performed all conditions, covenants, and promises required by him on his part to be performed in accordance with the terms and conditions of the contract.On or about ___, 19__ the defendant__ breached the said agreement by _____. By reason of defendant__ breach of said contract as herein alleged, the plaintiff__ has__ suffered damages in the sum of $__.By the terms of said written agreement, the Plaintiff is entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees incurred in the enforcement of the provisions of the agreement. By reason of the aforementioned breach of the defendant, the Plaintiff has been forced to “ACT AS PROSECUTOR AND ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE 50 STATES.” WHEREFORE, plaintiff__ pray__ judgment against defendant__ and each of them, as follows:

For compensatory damages in the sum of $___; For interest on the sum of $___ from and after ___, 19__ to date of judgment;For reasonable attorney fees according to proof; For costs of suit herein incurred; and For such other and further relief as the court may deem proper, writs of attachment, arrest warrants,

VIOLATION OF 2ND AMENDMENT RIGHT

BUSH, OBAMA AND HOLDER KNOWINGLY, INTENTIONALLY CAME ON TO MY PREMISES, ARRESTED MY WITHOUT PROBABLE CAUSE STOLE MY GUN AND BUSINESS COMPUTER AND PAPERS, CHARGE ME WITH THEFT BY TAKING AND CONSPIRED WITH JUDGES TO DISMISS EACH AND EVERY ONE OF THE COMPLAINTS I FILED

Current law prohibits individuals from buying a gun if, because of a mental health issue, they are either a danger to themselves or others or are unable to manage their own affairs. The Social Security Administration (SSA) has indicated that it will begin the rulemaking process to ensure that appropriate information in its records is reported to NICS. The reporting that SSA, in consultation with the Department of Justice, records of the approximately 75,000 people each year who have a documented mental health issue, receive disability benefits, federal prohibition on possessing a firearm for reasons related to mental health. There are many disabled people who are receive checks on behalf of disabled people.

1. Obama and/or Loretta Lynch conspired under the color of law, breached her duties and/or legal obligations as United States Attorney General, violated her oath of office and further violated the class Plaintiff Second Amendment rights to bear arms a committed a number of other overt acts requiring injunctive relief.

• As a direct and proximate consequence of the Defendants’ actions, Plaintiffs were deprived of certain rights, privileges and immunities secured by the Constitution of the United States of America(Human rights via the Universal Declaration International laws and treaties) the laws of this Nation and the “50 States.” and the Class Plaintiffs  2^nd  amendment’ Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment rights to procedural and/or  substantive due process and equal protection of the laws were violated by the Defendants, together with their Eighth Amendment right proscribing cruel and unusual punishment and their Fourth Amendment right to be free of unreasonable searches and seizures, as well as their First Amendment right to free speech and expression.  The Class Plaintiff and/or the Class members lost their ability to earn a living due to the above Defendants conspiracies, conspiracies to defraud the Plaintiffs out of money or property, violence against the Plaintiffs(WOMEN minority business owners), oppression, unfair business practices, unfair competition, conspiracies to restrain commerce, acts of threats, extortion, coercion, force, assault and battery, usurpation of business(is)The Specialty Investment Group LLC dissolved in Sept. 2010, due to the “repeated” conspiracies and/or unlawful attacks to restrain commerce, unfair competition, unfair business practices, repeated, continual  violation of the Specialty Investment Group LLC and/or the Plaintiff’s United States Constitutional violations civil rights by the above named Defendants. illegal overt acts by the United States Government  the Plaintiff has direct and/or indirectly proximate cause of the Plaintiff’s mental and emotional instability and social security, oppression, deprivation of business and personal property, theft, and anti-competitive conduct of one or more of  the Defendants of which conduct, which violates both federal antitrust laws.  The United States has been damaged and injured by the overt acts of the Defendants.

I have been unable to drive a car, work, make a living  due to the repeated conspiracies of the Defendants.  My son is currently on probation, via “threat,” coercion and/or force and is “forced” to pay $800.00 for crimes he did not commit(via concealment and/or acts or omissions of Barak H. Obama and/or Lynch). 

CLAIM II

  LIBEL

THE ELEMENTS OF LIBEL

1.  Name and legal description of court before which is brought.
2.  Name and legal description of Libellant and any offer or function or relationship the libellant may hold it the regret to sustain that action depends upon it, as if he be foreigner claim man any particular ground or him eecitopm guardian which act [tocotu he may he/she may be sued\end at home; or if the libellant be a married women or women with separate personal rights.
3. The name and legal description of the person soar the thing against when or which the suit is brought.
4. The nature of the cause as that it is civil or maritime contract, or tort or dame or of possession, or otherwise as the case may be and if the libel is in rem, the property is with the district, and if the persona the name and occupation and palaces of resident of the parties.
5. The facts upon which the suit is brought.
6. That the premises to be within the admiralty and maritime jurisdiction of the United States Courts
7. The prayer for the remedies which is situated to the case.
8. The prayer for relief or remedy which the libellant seeks by the suit, and which the court is competent to give.
9. The process prayed for may be a war of arrest the person of the Defendant in nature of a capital or warrant of arrest with a clause therein, if the Defendant can be found his/her goods and chattels to the amount sue for; or if such an not be found, to attach is credits and effects to the amount sued for in the hands of the garnishees named therein; or an single moment in in nature of a summons to appear and answer to the suit.

Plaintiff brings this case action on behalf of all African Americans, minorities from 1993 and continuing thru present who purchased a vehicle and displayed “drive out tag” as a license plate until they are able to obtain a license plate from the Department of Motor Vehicle and/or Secretary of State and who were pulled over a vehicle who were driving their cars and “pulled over,” and questioned by the police, received a traffic ticket.

Plaintiff brings this case action on behalf of all African Americans, minorities from 1993 and continuing thru present  who  lived in cities Major cities throughout the United States(Atlanta, Los Angeles, New York, Detroit, Chicago, i.e.)__________________________were assaulted, beaten, arrested, humiliated, falsely imprisonment, maliciously prosecuted without probable cause on the sole account based on race, class, gender, ethnicity, disability, national origin, and by Police Officers on the sole account of race, _____________

During all of the times referred to, Defendant Loretta Lynch (and Processors from 1993 and continuing thru to her term) is a Law Enforcement Officer, and were “Does 2001 thru 1, 000, 000, 000, 000,” police officers stationed at various Police States and members of the Police Department of “cities,” of “the United States.”

The “Class Representative,” and Plaintiff  Sharon Bridgewater son James S. Bridgewater , now 33 years of age, is, and at all times mentioned was a Citizen of the United States locations throughout the United States, and a resident of Michigan, and of the Eastern District of Michigan.

Plaintiff was arrested by Defendant _____________________on _________, at___time, and at the Redford Police Department.

The arrest was made without a warrant and the charge was for “Lying to a Police Officer.”

Concealed

The “Class Representative,” and Plaintiff Bridgewater, now 54 years of age, is, and at all times mentioned was a Citizen of the United States locations throughout the United States, and a resident of Michigan, and of the Eastern District of Michigan.

Plaintiff was arrested by Defendant _____________________on _________, at___time, and taken to the Washtenaw County Police Station concerning an alleged “driving ____________________.  All arrest were made without a warrant.  During one two or more arrest numerous articles of personal and business property were seized by the arresting officers without a warrant and not returned.  Despite the “repeated,” “continual,” plea of the Class Plaintiff to return her business or personal property.   Plaintiff remained and continues to remain in police custody via “one or more outstanding warrants, “and is unlawful held in violation of the United States Constititituion on the account she is a “Whistleblower, “ and/or federal witness and victim of Racketeering .

At _______time___on _____date, Plaintiff was again on the same charge set forth in paragraph 4 by the Defendant____and other police officers, wrongfully imprisioned, with out a warrant and contrary to the United States Constitution and/or the “50State Statues.”  Plaintiff and Class members were taken to the scene of the alleged crime and there questioned by some of the Defendant and {set out acts] of the Defendant by reason of which playoffs was coerced.  Plaintiff and Class members was promised medical aid if he/she would sign a confession and was promised that the beatings would cease.  Plaintiff then initialed some paper and the beatings ceased.  Uniteder compulsion of the beatings and threats previously described and desiring immediate medical aid, the Plaintiff was compelled to testify against him/herself by signing a stating admitting the burglary or some other crime. 

        Defendants beat plaintiff for the purpose of forcing he/her to make a confession and for the purpose of imposing illegal summary punishment on him/her.  Defendant was held incommunicado for a period of over various hours 1-72 hours and the Defendants refused to permit Plaintiff attorney to see or consult with him or her client, the Plaintiff.  As a result of the beatings by the Defendant [describe injuries], all in violation of the laws of the United States, as more particularly set for later.  The action of Defendants were under color of law.

            Title 42 USC section 1985(2) provides in part as follows:” If two or more persons conspire for the purpose of impeding, hindering, obstructing, or defeating in any manner, the due course of justice in any State or Territory, with intent to deny to any citizen the equal protection of the law, or to injure him or his property for lawfully enforcing or attempting to enforce, the right of any person or class of persons, to the equal protection of the laws,”

          Subparagraph(3) of the same Section provides as follows: in any case of conspiracy set forth in this section, if one or more persons engaged in conspiracy do, or cause to be done any act in furtherance of the object of the conspiracy, by which another is injured in his person or property, or deprived of having and excising any right or privilege of a citizen of the United States, the party so injured or deprived may have deprivation, against any one or more of the conspirators.”

                     From Jan. . . .1, 1993 and continuing thru present in the City of _____________Northen District of Georgia, the Defendants entered into a conspiracy with each other, and with other parties whose names are unknown to the Plaintiff, for the purpose of impeding, hindering, obstructing or defeating the due course of justice in the State of Michigan and/or other States with intent to deny the Plaintiff equal protection of the laws and with intent to injure his/her lawfully enforcing or attemptiming to enforce her right to equal protection o f the laws in that the Defendant, pursuant ot the conspiracy caused the Plaintiff to be unlawfully arrested; caused the institution, and continuation thru to present of malicious prosecution agains the Plaintiff; gave and caused to be given perjured testismony resulting in the return of an indictment in the 14A Judicial District Court for the State of Michigan and subsequently warrants and/or wrongful conviction of Plaintiff causing Plaintiff to be falsely imprisioned since Sept. 2007.  Which incarceration resulted in loss wages to h___as ______over $__________; persisted in uttering perjured and false testimony in the hearing on numerous habeas corpus and post-conviction petitions filed by plaintiff and heard during _____,_______and______; over_______petitions were filed during the period;  the persistence continuing even after the ___Supreme Court affirmed the granting of a new trial to Plaintiff in the return of their mandate to the ___court of _on __date; caused duress and fear of retribution to be exercised on the Plaintiff up to and including____date.  Pursuant to the conspiracy, Defendants seriously injured Plaintiff and caused her, by force and violence, to testify against herself by means of a wrongfully obtained confession, with respect to charges against him of which Plaintiff was innocent and which charges constituted a crime under the laws of the state of ______.  As a result of the wrongful conduct of the Defendants, carried out under color of law, the Plaintiff was deprived of his/her constitutional  rights secured to him/her by the Fourteenth Amndmentot the Untied States Cosntitution.  The conspiracy continues to this present date. 

           In furtherance of the objectives of the conspiracy referred to in the proceding paragraph, the Defendant either did, or cause to be done, the following overt acts: set out the illegal acts

1. Unconstitutional Traffic Stops
2. D
3. D
4. E
5. C
6. C
7.  

The acts which Defendants did or caused to be done in furtherance of the conspiracy referred to and described in the preceding paragraphs, injured the body of the Plaintiff permanently and has caused him/her extreme paind and suffering which still continues. 

1. On or about August 2008 and continuing thru present the Plaintiff claimed an interest in the “Office of the United States Attorney General.”

• On or about Nov. 1, 2007, Public Officers illegally unlawfully deprived and caused injury

• On or about Nov. and continuing thru repeatedly requested the return of her office and business(computer, gun________________)and deprived and/or deprived the Plaintiff equal protection under the law and/or equal privilege and violated the

• by filing multiple complaints against Barak H. Obama and/or Eric Holder alleging libel, peonage, slavery, human rights violation and/or RICO violations

• Caused one or more indictment, grand jury in violation of ________.

• On or about Nov. 2007 and continuing thru present Eric Holder(and those operating under his direction) published and/or posted defamatory information on the DOJ website and/or in the NCIC crime data base that the Class Claimant had been convicted and/or arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol; theft by taking; and further posted mug shots, warrants for arrest  and  an defamatory posting of an “ARMED AND DANGEROUS,” in the  Department of Justice data base[nation wide], [1]  without probable cause.

• The entire statement and/or posting is false as it pertains to the Class Plaintiff Bridgewater.

• The described publication and/or posting on the Department of Justice website and data bases are libelous on its face.  It clearly expose Plaintiff to hatred, contempt, ridicule and oblguy, because a “ARMED AND DANGEROUS” posting is clearly a posting for  “mass murders or extremely dangerous persons such as terrorist or rapist; and charges the Class Plaintiff  with having committed a serious crime of murder, rape, etc. [2]

10.. As a proximate result of the above the Plaintiff has suffered lost of reputation, low self esteem, shame, mortification, injury to all to her damage in excess of $100,000,000,000,000.00.

The above describe publication is not privileged because it was published or posted by Defendant Eric Holder in the Department of Justice and upon information and belief with the state of mind of malice, hatred and/or ill will toward the Plaintiff and without probable cause and upon information and belief in retaliation “only because the Plaintiff was the victim of Racketeering (Federal Witness),” and the will to punish the Plaintiff for asserting her legal rights. On or about April 24, 2015, Loretta Lynch (and Barak H.Obama-2009 and continuing thru present) entered into an agreement (express or implied) with the United States Government to faithfully execute duties, and to uphold the United States Constitution._______see

     In accord with the provision of the agreement,the Plaintiff (the United States Government) paid Loretta Lynch (and Obama et al) a weekly salary of ________________upon the performance of _____________duties, and to uphold the United States Constitution.  Loretta Lynch knew or should have known that such _________is discriminatory, violates the Class Plaintiff civil rights, .  Loretta Lynch breached her upon information and belief knowingly, intentionally violated the Plaintiff Civil rights.

Defendant Loretta Lynch and Barry Soetoes and each of the did the acts and things herein alleged pursuant to, and in furtherance of the conspiracy, in that on or about SOn or about Nov. 2007 and continuing thru present Eric Holder(and those operating under his direction) published and/or posted defamatory information on the DOJ website and/or in the NCIC crime data base that the Class Claimant had been convicted and/or arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol; theft by taking; and further posted mug shots, warrants for arrest  and  an defamatory posting of an “ARMED AND DANGEROUS,” in the  Department of Justice data base[nation wide], without probable cause.

1. The entire statement and/or posting is false as it pertains to the Class Plaintiff Bridgewater.

• The described publication and/or posting on the Department of Justice website and data bases are libelous on its face.  It clearly expose Plaintiff to hatred, contempt, ridicule and oblguy, because a “ARMED AND DANGEROUS” posting is clearly a posting for  “mass murders or extremely dangerous people such as terrorist or rapist(BOTH WITNESSES SHARON AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER HAS NO JUVENILLE, MISDEMEANOR OR FELONY RECORD); and charges the Class Plaintiff  with having committed a serious crime of murder, rape, etc.

10.. As a proximate result of the above the Plaintiff  James S. Bridgewater has suffered lost of reputation, low self esteem, shame, mortification, injury to all to her damage in excess of $10,000.00000000000.

• The above describe publication is not privileged because it was published or posted by Defendant Loretta Lynch in the Department of Justice and upon information and belief with the state of mind of malice, hatred and/or ill will toward the Plaintiff James S. Bridgewaerand without probable cause and upon information and belief in retaliation “only because the Plaintiff was the victim of Racketeering (Federal Witness),” and the will to punish the Plaintiff for asserting her legal rights.   

---

[1] AND CONTINUES TO POST THIS DEFAMATORY INFORMATION.

1. [2] There have been multiple, numerous other unlawful acts(complete torture and torment too many to mention during the course of 7-8 years).

[3] AND CONTINUES TO POST THIS DEFAMATORY INFORMATION.

• [4] There have been multiple, numerous other unlawful acts(complete torture and torment too many to mention during the course of 7-8 years).

CLAIM III

NEGILENCE

In any negligence case, the plaintiff bears the burden of proving the existence of a duty owed by the defendant, a breach of that duty, causation, and damage

On or about Jan. 4, 2016 Defendant Lynch and/or obamaperfomed acts that a person of ordinary prudence in the same or similar cicumstances would not have done or she failed to perform acts that a person or ordinary prudence would have done under he same or cimilar circumstance becase she is the United States Attorney General and knew and/or should have known the “Untied States Constitution.” Even further Obama was an instructor at Hardvard “Specializing in constitutional law, he too knew or should have known the the Class Plaintiff were violated.  The Class Plaintiff have been injured and damge by the the 2^nd amended US Cosntiton rights violations and have damages this amount is due and now owing.

CLAIM IV

BREACH OF CONTRACT AGAINST  LORETTA LYNCH IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITY

By reason of defendant Loretta Lynch breach of said contract and/or negligence as herein alleged, the plaintiff “the United States et al and/or the “Class Petitioner Representative Bridgewater and/or Class Member  has suffered damages in the sum of not less than and not less than 100,000,000,000,000,000(One Hunred Trillion Dollars-class Defendants).

By the terms of said written agreement, the Plaintiff is entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees incurred in the enforcement of the provisions of the agreement. By reason of the aforementioned breach of the defendant Loretta Lynch, the Plaintiff has been forced to “ACT AS PROSECUTOR, TO DEFEND FOR THE UNITED STATES, ET AL,” to collect fines, etc. ) and to  recover money and/or property on behalf of the “ United 50 States et al.”    Further on or about Nov. 15, 2015 and continuing thru present the Petitioner has sent Loretta Lynch “duly authorized, first class certified mail,” and a number of times since then, plaintiff  Bridgewater has demanded Loretta Lynch in her official capacity to  stop her wrongful conduct described above. Defendants Loretta Lynch as the United States Attorney General et al , and each of them, have refused and still refuse to refrain from their wrongful conduct.

             Defendants Loretta Lynch in her official capacity unless and until enjoined and restrained by order of this court, will cause great and irreparable injury to “the United States et al ,” in that “the United 50 States and/or the Plaintiff will suffer and continue to suffer from deprivation of property and/or money without due process of law in violaton of the United  Constitution and/or International laws and treaties.The enterprise “federal officials” joint participation has  changed, or altered the movement or ransportation or flow of goods, merchandise, money, or other property between or mong two or more states (between a state and a foreign country).Nature of Trade and Commerce; Real Estate .Holder acted or refused to act on ground generally applicable to the Class

By the aforesaid acts and omissions Defendants caused the damage and _____The United States performed all of its contractual obligations pertaining to the payment via the job of the United States President and/or the United States Attorney General “all officer shall uphold the United States Constitution, ___________faithfully ________, Loretta Lynch prosecute

As a result of the aforesaid acts and omissions, Defendants breached its contractual obligation by failing to perform work as the United States President and the United Statea Attorney General., as a consequence of which the United States is entitled to money damaged in the amount ________

<>. On or about ___, 19__, in the City of ___, County of ___, State of California, Plaintiff and defendant entered into a written agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and made a part hereof. By the terms of said written agreement, ___.

The consideration set forth in the agreement was the fair and reasonable.Plaintiff has performed all conditions, covenants, and promises required by him on his part to be performed in accordance with the terms and conditions of the contract.On or about ___, 19__ the defendant__ breached the said agreement by _____. By reason of defendant__ breach of said contract as herein alleged, the plaintiff__ has__ suffered damages in the sum of $__.By the terms of said written agreement, the Plaintiff is entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees incurred in the enforcement of the provisions of the agreement. By reason of the aforementioned breach of the defendant, the Plaintiff has been forced to “ACT AS PROSECUTOR AND ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE 50 STATES.” WHEREFORE, plaintiff__ pray__ judgment against defendant__ and each of them, as follows:

For compensatory damages in the sum of $___; For interest on the sum of $___ from and after ___, 19__ to date of judgment;For reasonable attorney fees according to proof; For costs of suit herein incurred; and For such other and further relief as the court may deem proper, writs of attachment, arrest warrants,

CLAIM I

                                     [ RICO ]

                              BREACH OF CONTRACT

Plaintiff allege that the Defendant Donald Trump in his official capacity breached his contract, the Plaintiff has demanded property and Defendant has failed and refuse and continues to fail and to refuse, to remit the money and/or property although duly demanded requiring immediate injunctive relief and the Plaintiff has been damaged and continues to be damage and have damages  as follows:

_____________________                                                     $_______________

This amount is due and now owing, and the Plaintiff is entitled to writ of attachment,  judgment in the amount of __________________.  

Amount paid  $0                                 Amount due: $______________________.

                                                     CLAIM I

                                     [ RICO ]

                              BREACH OF FIDICARY DUTIES

Plaintiff allege that the Defendant Donald Trump in his official capacity breached his contract, the Plaintiff has demanded property and Defendant has failed and refuse and continues to fail and to refuse, to remit the money and/or property although duly demanded requiring immediate injunctive relief and the Plaintiff has been damaged and continues to be damage and have damages  as follows:

_____________________                                                     $_______________

This amount is due and now owing, and the Plaintiff is entitled to writ of attachment,  judgment in the amount of __________________.  

Amount paid  $0                                 Amount due: $______________________.  

                                                        CLAIM II

                                      [ RICO ]

CONDUCT AND PARTICIPATION IN A RICO ENTERPRIZE THRU A PATTERN OF

                                                RACKEETEERING ACTIVITY

Plaintiff allege that the Defendant Donald Trump in his official capacity conducted in a Rico Enterprize thru a pattern of Rackeeteering Activity  and the plaintiff has been injured and damaged and  Plaintiff has demanded property and Defendant has failed and refuse and continues to fail and to refuse, to remit the money and/or property although duly demanded requiring immediate injunctive relief and the Plaintiff has been damaged and continues to be damage and have damages  as follows:

_____________________                                                     $_______________

The Plantiff have punitive damages in the amount of $ ________________________.  This amount is due and now owing.

This amount is due and now owing, and the Plaintiff is entitled to writ of attachment,  judgment in the amount of __________________.

Amount paid  $0                                 Amount due: $______________________.  

.

                                                      CLAIM III

                                                   [ RICO ]

     CONSPIRACY TO ENGAGE IN A PATTERN OF RACKEETEERING ACTIVITY:

Plaintiff allege that the Defendant Donald Trump in his official capacity conspired to engage in a pattern of Rackeeterring Activity and the plaintiff has been injured and damaged and  Plaintiff has demanded property and Defendant has failed and refuse and continues to fail and to refuse, to remit the money and/or property although duly demanded requiring immediate injunctive relief and the Plaintiff has been damaged and continues to be damage and have damages  as follows:

_____________________                                                     $_______________

This amount is due and now owing, and the Plaintiff is entitled to writ of attachment,  judgment in the amount of __________________.

Amount paid  $0                                 Amount due: $______________________.  

                                                    CLAIM IV

                                                    [ RICO ]

                              MALICIOUS PROSECUTION

Plaintiff allege that the Defendant Donald Trump in his official capacity instituted and/or continued a criminal proceeding agains the claimant and the termination of the proceeding ended in the Claimant favor and the plaintiff has been injured and damaged anPlaintiff has demanded property and Defendant has failed and refuse and continues to fail and to refuse, to remit the money and/or property although duly demanded requiring immediate injunctive relief and the Plaintiff has been damaged and continues to be damage and have damages  as follows:

_____________________                                                     $_______________

This amount is due and now owing, and the Plaintiff is entitled to writ of attachment,  judgment in the amount of __________________.

Amount paid  $0                                 Amount due: $______________________.  

                                                    CLAIM V

                                                    [ RICO ]

   VIOLATION OF THE CLAIMANT 5^TH AND/OR 9^TH AND/OR 10^TH AMENDMENT US CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT[42 USC SECTION 1983/1985(3)]

Plaintiff allege that the Defendant Donald Trump in his official capacity acted under the color of law denied and/or deprived the Claimant her 5^th and/or 9^th and/or 10^th Amendment US Constitutional rights and the plaintiff has been injured and damaged anPlaintiff has demanded property and Defendant has failed and refuse and continues to fail and to refuse, to remit the money and/or property although duly demanded requiring immediate injunctive relief and the Plaintiff has been damaged and continues to be damage and have damages  as follows:

_____________________                                                     $_______________

This amount is due and now owing, and the Plaintiff is entitled to writ of attachment,  judgment in the amount of __________________.

Amount paid  $0                                 Amount due: $______________________.  

                                                        CLAIM VI

                                                       [ RICO ]

                                                       LIBEL

Plaintiff allege that the Defendant Donald Trump in his official capacity acted under the color of law conspired with other and “libeled” the Claimant and the plaintiff has been injured and damaged anPlaintiff has demanded property and Defendant has failed and refuse and continues to fail and to refuse, to remit the money and/or property although duly demanded requiring immediate injunctive relief and the Plaintiff has been damaged and continues to be damage and have damages  as follows:

_____________________                                                     $_______________

This amount is due and now owing, and the Plaintiff is entitled to writ of attachment,  judgment in the amount of __________________.

Amount paid  $0                                 Amount due: $______________________.  

                                                       CLAIM VII

                                                       [ RICO ]

                                                 NEGLIENCE

Plaintiff allege that the Defendant Donald Trump in his official capacity was negligent in enforcing unconstitutional, arbiratory law via the March 6, 2017 executive order and the plaintiff has been injured and damaged anPlaintiff has demanded property and Defendant has failed and refuse and continues to fail and to refuse, to remit the money and/or property although duly demanded requiring immediate injunctive relief and the Plaintiff has been damaged and continues to be damage and have damages  as follows:

_____________________                                                     $_______________

This amount is due and now owing, and the Plaintiff is entitled to writ of attachment,  judgment in the amount of __________________.

Amount paid  $0                                 Amount due: $______________________.  

                                                       CLAIM VIII

                                                       [ RICO ]

                                        PUNITIVE DAMAGE

Plaintiff allege that the Defendant Donald Trump in his official capacity had conscious disregard for the Claimant civil rights and/or Declaration of human rights and the plaintiff has been injured and damaged and has demanded property and Defendant has failed and refuse and continues to fail and to refuse, to remit the money and/or property although duly demanded requiring immediate injunctive relief and the Plaintiff has been damaged and continues to be damage and have damages  as follows:

_____________________                                                     $_______________

This amount is due and now owing, and the Plaintiff is entitled to writ of attachment,  judgment in the amount of __________________.

Amount paid  $0                                 Amount due: $______________________.  

WRIT OF MANDUMUS

CLAIM #V

DECLARATORY JUDGMENT

An actual controversy has arisen and now exists between plaintiff and defendant Loretta E. Lynch in her official capacity as United States Attorney General and/or “the Class Representative Bridgewater,” concerning their respective rights and duties in that plaintiff Representative contends “she at all times mention has been harmed and damaged and continues to be damaged by Loretta Lynch’s actions.  This court is now vested with appropriate jurisdiction and power to declare the rights and legal relations of the parties “The United States..et al,” are entitled to the declaration, the declaration to have the force and effect of a final judgment aor decree, and to be reviewable as a final judgment or decree, and further this court may adjudge and decree and declare that the rights and legal relations of the parties      to the  subject matter here in controversy, in order that the declaration shall have the force and effect of a final judgment and decree.

                                 a.  fully vested with the right to prosecute, via the Private Attorney General

Statue (RICO) and/or collect and/or recover fines et al on behalf of the

United States Government .

                                 b. Barak H.Obama(AKA Barry Soertoes) and/or “et als,” can not exert

executive privilege, and declare that the Plaintiff may amend her

                                      complaint to add Barak H. Obama in his individually capacity as United

                                      States President.

                                 c.. “The United States ex rel Sharon Bridgewater Private Attorney General

and/or Qui Tam Relator(Claimant et al )is fully  vested with the right to

have a writ of quo warranto issued upon Loretta Lynch in her official

capacity as United States Attorney General.

                                d. That this court adjudge and decree that Lynch and/or Barak H. Obama

violated the “The United States ex rel Sharon Bridgewater Private

Attorney General and/or Qui Tam Relator(Claimant et al )class Plaintiff

 Have the right to pre-judgment attachment in the amount of $!25,000,000,000,000,000.00(Trillion Dollars) for the United States ex rel Sharon Bridgewater Private Attorney General and/or Qui Tam Relator.  $_____________________

e. That the Petiititioner is entitled to a summary judgment.

.

CLAIM #VI

INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

B. Irreparable Harm and Balancing of Hardships and E.ties

. On balance, Plaintiff’s hardship

in not being able to express his views and the public interest in protecting speechoutweigh the Government’s interest in suppressing an intimidating symbol.Plaintiffs has demonstrated a strong possibility of irreparable harm absent apreliminary injunction.  Millions of US Citizen are even now Marching toward Washington to oust Obama and/or Holder from Office. In order to prevent a National Riot this Court must take actions now to secure the safety and security of the United States of America.   The issuance of a pretrial restraining order is not discretionary: if the Government makes the re.red probable cause showing, the court must entertheorder.if not enjoined, will cause immediate and irreparable injury to the United States Government and continued loss of billions of dollars and have asserted claims of already presented sufficient facts to establish the elements of each of the claims there is a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of the plaintiff’s claim.

C. The Injury to Sharon Bridgewater  outweigh the harm an injunction may cause Defendants;

The entry of a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction giving Plaintiffs

Writ of attachment, assets, and/or a for the Defendants to post a bond will cause no harm whatsoever to Defendants and the prevention of eviction of camp take notice.  

.

D. The granting of the injunction would not harm the public interest.

Where a party demonstrates both the likelihood of success on the merits and irreparable. injury, it almost always will be the case that the public interest will favor the issuance of aninjunction will protect the public interest, protect the US Government from fraudulent false claims and prevent further RICO acts.   The Supreme Court has repeatedly emphasized that courts are vested with extensive e.table powers to fashion appropriate remedies to redress unlawful conduct.  An example, in Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Bd. of Educ., 402 U.. 1 (1971), the Supreme Court stated: Once a right and a violation have been shown, the scope of a district court’s e.table powers to remedy past wrongs is broad, for breadth and flexibility are inherent in e.tableremedies.“The essence of e.ty jurisdiction has been the power of the Chancellor to do e.ty and to mould each decree to the necessities of the particular case. Flexibility rather than rigidity has distinguished it. The qualities of mercy and practicality have made e.ty the instrument for nice adjustment and reconciliation between the public interest and private needs as well as between competing private claims.” Hecht Co. v. Bowles, 321 U.. 321, 329-330 (1944), also See also Mitchell v. Robert DeMario Jewelry, Inc., 361 U.. 288, 291-92 (1960)

Moreover, the Supreme Court has pointedly ruled that where “the public interest is involved. . . those e.table powers assume an even broader and more flexible character than when only a private controversy is at stake.” Porter v. Warner Holding, Co., 328 U.. 395, 398 (1946). Accord Virginian Ry. Co. v. Sys. Fed’n. No. 40, 300 U.. 515, 552 (1937) (“Courts of e.ty may, and frequently do, go much farther both to give and withhold relief in furtherance of the public interest than they are accustomed to go when only private interests are involved.”) (collecting cases); Golden State Bottling Co. v. NLRB, 414 U.. 168, 179-80 (1973) (same).12

In accordance with these principles, courts have imposed a wide variety of highly

intrusive e.table remedies in institutional reform litigation to remedy constitutional violations and to foster paramount public interests, including various structural reforms.13 Typically in such cases, the e.table relief afforded exceeds an injunction enjoining the proscribed conduct, and also encompasses compelled changes in practices, structural changes and prolonged court-supervision over implementation of the e.table relief. See generally, DOBBS, Vol. Two at 348-353.  The United States of America as well as class Plaintiff There are no adequate remedy at law. 

CLAIM #VII

MY PRAYER TO GOD IN HEAVEN

Wherefore , IT IS DECREED, ORDER, ADJUDGE

            1. THE STATE of Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming[the District of Columbia, the Common wealth of Puerto Rico, The US Virgin Island, Guam, theNorthern Marianna Islands, the American Samoa] EX REL Sharon Bridgewater (A.K.A. Sharon Abusalem, Sharon Davis) Private Attorney General and QUI TAM RELATOR[ FROM 1993 and continuing thru present]-  Real parties in interest

CLAIMANT AND/OR PLAINTIFF prays and/or declare that Loretta Lynch Social Security, ATF acts of Jan. 4, 2016 and/or May 9, 2016 unconstitutionally infringes upon Sharon Bridgewater and other class members one or more 2^nd 4^th, 5^th, 9^th, 10^th, 14^th, US Constitional rights amendementthe rights and/or breach her contract as US Attorney General and/or violated her oath of office and committeed a criminal act.

12..  Jugment in the amount of ____________________for claim #1 Libel, order the

             Defendants to immediately pay and issue writs of attachment.

     13..  Jugment in the amount of ____________________for claim #2 Violation of the Equal

              Protection 2^nd amendment and Violation of the Right   to bear Firearms(US

             Constitutional Amendment II), 42 USC SECTION 1983  order the Defendants to

               immediately pay and issue writs of  attachment.

      14..  Judement in the amount of ____________________for claim #3 neglience and order

              The  Defendants to immediately pay and issue writs of attachment.

      15..  Judgment in the amount of ____________________for claim #4 breach of contract 

               and

            order the Defendants to immediately pay and issue writs of attachment.

    16.. Declaratory Judgment declaring that Plaintiff is:

                                 a.  fully vested with the right to prosecute, via the Private Attorney General

Statue (RICO) and/or collect and/or recover fines et al on behalf of the

United States Government .

                                 b. Barak H.Obama(AKA Barry Soertoes) and/or “et als,” can not exert

executive privilege, and declare that the Plaintiff may amend her

                                      complaint to add Barak H. Obama in his individually capacity as United

                                      States President.

                                 c.. “The United States ex rel Sharon Bridgewater Private Attorney General

and/or Qui Tam Relator(Claimant et al )is fully  vested with the right to

have a writ of quo warranto issued upon Loretta Lynch in her official

capacity as United States Attorney General.

                                d. That this court adjudge and decree that Lynch and/or Barak H. Obama

violated the “The United States ex rel Sharon Bridgewater Private

Attorney General and/or Qui Tam Relator(Claimant et al )class Plaintiff

 Have the right to pre-judgment attachment in the amount of $!25,000,000,000,000,000.00(Trillion Dollars) for the United States ex rel Sharon Bridgewater Private Attorney General and/or Qui Tam Relator.  $_____________________

e. That the Petiititioner is entitled to a summary judgment.

.

17. .Equitable and/or Injunctive Relief Prejudgment writs of attachment in

$125,000,000,000,000,000.00 Judgment against Loretta

Lynch

     THIS COURT USD) to commence Relator’s  rehabilitation  i.e. food, shelter, clothing,  and

      transportation,  payable by the Office of the U.S. Attorney General, District of

       Columbia to the client trust account (Sharon Bridgewater)of the lawyer duly appointed by

    16.. udgment in the amount of $ 1,000,000,000,000,000 MILLION DOLLARS

           AGAINST LORETTA LYNCH IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY.

18.    Partial judgment in the amount of $ ___________________– payment of  ten thousand

U.S. Dollars ($10,000.00 )

 18.. That this Court liberally construe the RICO laws and thereby find and/or declare that all Defendants have associated with a RICO enterprise of persons and of other individuals who were associated in fact, all of whom did engage in, and whose activities did affect, interstate and foreign commerce in violation of the RICO law at 18 U.S.C. 1962(c) (Prohibited activities).

 19..That this Court liberally construe the RICO laws and thereby find that all Defendants have conducted and/or participated, directly or indirectly, in the affairs of said RICO enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity in violation of the RICO laws at 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961(5) (“pattern” defined) and 1962(c) supra.

20.  That all Defendants and all of their directors, officers, employees, agents, servants and all other persons in active concert or in participation with them, be enjoined temporarily during pendency of this action, and permanently thereafter, from associating with any RICO enterprise of persons, or of other individuals associated in fact, who do engage in, or whose activities do affect, interstate and foreign commerce.

21.. That all Defendants and all of their directors, officers, employees, agents, servants and all other persons in active concert or in participation with them, be enjoined temporarily during pendency of this action, and permanently thereafter, from conducting or participating, either directly or indirectly, in the conduct of the affairs of any RICO enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity in violation of the RICO laws at 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961(5) and 1962(c) supra.

22.That if Defendant  cannot be found within this District then all of their property within this istrict be attached in the sum of $125,000,000,000,000,1,000,000,000.00(one hundred and twenty five trillion and one million dollars, with interest thereon and cost, the sum sued for in this complaint.

23.  That judgment be entered against the dfenant in the sum of $$125,000,000,000,000,1,000,000,000.00(one hundred and twenty five trillion and one million dollars, together with interest and costs; and

24. That this Court order the attachment of said property pruusantot he aforesaid provovision of CPLR and FRCP 4(e) and Rule B(1) of the Supplenmtnal Rules for certain Admarility and Maritime claims: and

25.    That process in due form of law, according to the practices of this Honorable Court in causes of admirality and maritime jurisprudence, April issue agains the The Federal Reserve, foreign Officials, and all Defndants that all person having or claiming any interest therein be citized to apper and answer under oath, all and singular the matters aforesaid; that Plaitniff have a deree for its damaged aforesaid, with interest and cost; and that the The Federal Reserve, foreign Officials, and all Defndants be condemned and sld to stisfy plaintiff decree;

26.   That process in due form of law April issue against B citing it to appear and answer, under oath, all and singular, the matters aforesaid

27.   That the Court order, adjudge and decree that Plaitnifff have a decree against B for claim asserted gy plaintiff herein tooether with interest and costs and 

28.    To issue an order to the U.S. Department of Justice Loretta Lynch to show cause why she should not be held in criminal and/or civil contempt of court.

29.   To  attachment of said property pruusantot he aforesaid one or more supplemental rule B, C, D, E and/or F, 4(e) and Rule B(1) of the Supplenmtnal Rules for certain Admarility and Maritime claims: and/or

30.   That process in due form of law, according to the practices of this Honorable Court in causes of admirality and maritime jurisprudence, intangible and/or tangible property in and up to the amount of $$125,000,000,000,000,1,000,000,000.00(one hundred and twenty five trillion and one million dollars, and that all person having or claiming any interest therein be citized to apper and answer under oath, all and singular the matters aforesaid; that Plaitniff have a deree for its damaged aforesaid, with interest and cost; and that the $$125,000,000,000,000,1,000,000,000.00(one hundred and twenty five trillion and one million dollarsbe condemned and sld to stisfy plaintiff decree;

1. That process in due form of law April issue against B citing it to appear and answer, under oath, all and singular, the matters aforesaid;
2. That the Court order, adjudge and decree that Plaitnifff have a decree against B for claim asserted gy plaintiff herein tooether with interest and costs and 
3. That Plaintiff have such other and further relief as April be proper and that this Court scompettnetotgrnt.
4. That Plaintiff have such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, under the full range of relevant circumstances which have occasioned the instant action.
5. WRIT OF ATTACHMENT in the amount of Plaitniffs damages, tighter with interest thereon form the rrespective dates due, cost, disbursements, and reasonable attorney fees.
   1. That process in due form of law according to the practice of this court in cases of admirality and maritime jurisdiction April issue against the Defendant cititng it to apprear and answer all the matters described in this complaint.
   1. Plaintiff have such other and further relief in the premises as in law and justice in April be entitled to receive.

 (7) Order directing the U.S. Marshals Service to expedite Relator’s safe passage to Detroit,

      Michigan(home) 12070 W. Outer Drive, Detroit, Michigan 48223 USA; and,
    
(8) any and all other relief which this Court deems just and proper under the several circumstances

       which have occasioned the instant INITIAL APPLICATION e.g. Habeas Corpus relief,WRITS

     OF MANDUMUS(EXPUNGEMENT OF ARREST WARRANTS, ETC.), AND  relief

       from retaliatory actions, triple damages etc.

•  

• For judgment in the amount of Plaitniffdamgestogher with interettheron form the resptice dates due, cost, disburements, and reasonable attorney feees.

• Declare that Lynch actions are illegal and unlawful in that she can not obstruct justice and/or a congressional investigation .

• Declare thatthePlaintiff Bridgewater is unlawful held against her will and each and every arrest warrant of the Plaintiff is illegal and are void.

1. Declare that the Plaintiff Sharon and/or James Bridgewater is unlawful imprisoned against her will under the State of Michigan and Georgia, and/or California law.

1. Declare that Holder cannot withhold any information pertaining to this complaint, allegations, and the Plaintiff “Sharon Bridgewater” is entitled to injunctive relief

1. Declare that Lynch and/or Holder must produce all documents relating to any and all allegations made by the Plaintiffs and/or the Committeee and Oversight.

1. Deckare that Lynch is disqualified and/or declare that the Platniff Bridgewater can prosecute this action.

1. Under federal rules of Criminal Procedure – Rule 6, submit the name of Respondant Barak H. Obama in his official capacity, Loretta Lynch in her official capacity, Hillary Clinton “respondants,” and all other co-conspirator to a federal grand jury for [included common law grand jury letter-to all judges]for the crime of advocating the overthrow of the Constituional form of government of the United States, Treason, etc.(5 USC 3331, 5 USC 3333, 18 usc 1918 and Executive order No.s

1. Accordingly, all premises having been duly considered here, the United States now moves the Honorable Justices of this District Court for an ORDER to the 17A District Court  to show cause why Extraordinary Writs of Mandamus should not issue, commanding that Circuit Court to perform ‑‑ with all deliberate speed ‑‑ all duties owed to Appellant as specifically itemized above, beginning with a Habeas Corpus and/or Writs of mandamus to expunge arrest etc.

1. The United States moves for said ORDER, on the strengths of this PETITION and of the official records that are now before this Court, to reinstate a cause erroneously dismissed.

            grant the Petitioner all just and appropriate relief as deemed by this court.

I certify and/or Declare and/or state under penalty and perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed 1STday of August  2016 in Detroit, Michigan

_____________________________________

THE STATE of Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming[the District of Columbia, the Common wealth of Puerto Rico, The US Virgin Island, Guam, theNorthern Marianna Islands, the American Samoa] EX REL Sharon Bridgewater (A.K.A. Sharon Abusalem, Sharon Davis) Private Attorney General and QUI TAM RELATOR[ FROM 1993 and continuing thru present]-  Real parties in interest

_____________________

1. Accordingly, all premises having been duly considered here, the United States now moves the Honorable Justices of this District Court for an ORDER to the 17A District Court to show cause why Extraordinary Writs of Mandamus should not issue, commanding that Circuit Court to perform ‑‑ with all deliberate speed ‑‑ all duties owed to Appellant as specifically itemized above, beginning with a Habeas Corpus and/or Writs of mandamus to expunge arrest etc.

• The United States moves for said ORDER, on the strengths of this PETITION and of the official records that are now before this Court, to reinstate a cause erroneously dismissed.

• ISSUE AGAINST Defendants Loretta Lynch be cared to appear and answer the allegation of this Complaint;

• Issue a Writ of Qi Warrantor Loretta L. Lynch

• Private Attorney General, hereby exercises its statutory and appeal and moves this honorable Court for a Writ in the nature of Quo Warrantor to issue upon Loretta E. Lynching her official capacity as United States Attorney General to demonstrate by what lawful authorities each claims to preside as the United States of American Attorney General Intervener also moves this honorable Court for a routine ORDER to the District Court Clerk, commanding that Office formally to certify to the United States Attorney General  formal commanding that Office formally to certify appellant  for presentation of all evidence admissible in the instant appeal, and for argument(s) on the questions of the constitutionality of the above.

• That this Court liberally construe the RICO laws and thereby find and/or declare that all Defendants have associated with a RICO enterprise of persons and of other individuals who were associated in fact, all of whom did engage in, and whose activities did affect, interstate and foreign commerce in violation of the RICO law at 18 U.S.C. 1962(c) (Prohibited activities).

• That this Court liberally construe the RICO laws and thereby find that all Defendants have conducted and/or participated, directly or indirectly, in the affairs of said RICO enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity in violation of the RICO laws at 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961(5) (“pattern” defined).

• That all Defendants and all of their directors, officers, employees, agents, servants and all other persons in active concert or in participation with them, be enjoined temporarily during pendency of this action, and permanently thereafter, from associating with any RICO enterprise of persons, or of other individuals associated in fact, who do engage in, or whose activities do affect, interstate and foreign commerce.

• That all Defendants and all of their directors, officers, employees, agents, servants and all other persons in active concert or in participation with them, be enjoined temporarily during pendency of this action, and permanently thereafter, from conducting or participating, either directly or indirectly, in the conduct of the affairs of any RICO enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity in violation of the RICO laws at 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961(5) .

1. That if Defendant cannot be found within this District then all of their property within this district be attached in the sum of $________________________________, with interest thereon and cost, the sum sued for in this complaint.

1. That judgment be entered against the defendant in the sum of $_________________together with interest and costs; and

1. If for any reason it is alleged and/or found that Plaintiff is not entitled to the attachment of the Defendants property under Admiralty principle of foreign attachment, then in the, Plaintiff invokes the revision of Section 6201 to 6226 of the New York CPLR (and/or similar “50 State laws”).

1. this honorable Court for a Writ in the nature of Quo Warrantor to issue upon Loretta E. Lynching her official capacity as United States Attorney General to demonstrate by what lawful authorities claims to preside as the United States of American Attorney General commanding that Office formally to certify to the United States Attorney General  formal and the Intervener also moves this Court for a routine ORDER to the District Clerk, commanding that Office formally to certify Intervener’s intervention for presentation of all evidence admissible in the instant appeal, and for argument(s) on the questions of the constitutionality of the above.

1. All premises having been duly considered, Intervener respectfully requests this honorable Court to issue a routine ORDER to the U.S. Department of Justice Loretta E. Lynch to show because why she should not be held in criminal and/or civil contempt of court.

1. ate and prays that this Court order the attachment of said property pursuant to the aforesaid provision of CPLR and FRCP 4(e) and Rule B(1) of the Supplenmtnal Rules for certain Admarility and Maritime claims: and

1.  That process in due form of law, according to the practices of this Honorable Court in causes of admirality and maritime jurisprudence, April issue agains the The Federal Reserve, foreign Officials, and all Defndants that all person having or claiming any interest therein be citized to apper and answer under oath, all and singular the matters aforesaid; that Plaitniff have a deree for its damaged aforesaid, with interest and cost; and that the The Federal Reserve, foreign Officials, and all Defndants be condemned and sld to stisfy plaintiff decree;

1. That process in due form of law April issue against B citing it to appear and answer, under oath, all and singular, the matters aforesaid;

1. That the Court order, adjudge and decree that Plaitnifff have a decree against B for claim asserted gy plaintiff herein tooether with interest and costs and 

1. That Plaintiff have such other and further relief as April be proper and that this Court s compettnet ot grnt.

• That process in due form of law according to thepractice of this Honorable Court issue against the Defndants, citing them to appear and answer under oath all and singular the matters aforesaid;

• Declare that  Loretta E. Lynchaction constitute conspiracy under the color of law, and declare that Lynch is ineligle and/or disqualified as United States Attorney General.

• Declare Obama can not exert executive privledge.

• Judgment against Loretta LynchPrejudgment writs of Attachment for $100,000,000,000,0000,000(One Hundred Trillion Dollars via Loretta E. Lynch“Class Representative,”Million Dollars and prejudgment writ of attachment for  and Judgment against Barak Obama in her official capacity et al for $100,000,000,0000,0000  judgment for its damges with interest  and costs, agisnt the Defenants; and

• That this court grant Plaintiff such other and further relief as the justice of the cause April appear.

• To issue an order to the U.S. Department of Justice Loretta E. Lynchto show cause why she should not be held in criminal and/or civil contempt of court.
• To  attachment of said property pruusant ot he aforesaid provovision of CPLR and FRCP 4(e) and Rule B(1) of the Supplenmtnal Rules for certain Admarility and Maritime claims: and/or
• That process in due form of law, according to the practices of this Honorable Court in causes of admirality and maritime jurisprudence, April issue agains the stem ship, her enginces, tacke appearl. Etc. and that all person having or claiming any interest therein be citized to apper and answer under oath, all and singular the matters aforesaid; that Plaitniff have a deree for its damaged aforesaid, with interest and cost; and that the steamship__________be condemned and sld to stisfy plaintiff decree;
• That process in due form of law April issue against B citing it to appear and answer, under oath, all and singular, the matters aforesaid;
• That the Court order, adjudge and decree that Plaitnifff have a decree against B for claim asserted gy plaintiff herein tooether with interest and costs and 
• That Plaintiff have such other and further relief as April be proper and that this Court s compettnet ot grnt.
• That Plaintiff have such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, under the full range of relevant circumstances which have occasioned the instant action.
• All other relief in which this court may deem just and appropriate.
• Burification and/or Burificate all claims for relief .
• The Plaintiff request this court to tranfer and consolidate all related casesand further that this court issue a Writ of Certiorari in this cause  requiring Defendants to file the record of all matters relating to this decision with the Court; (b) that the Court issue an emergency stay of  enforcement of the decision pending review on the merits in this causeand that the Court review the decision of the Defendants, that  the final administrative  decision be reversed, and for such other relief as this court deems just.
• Accordingly, all premises having been duly considered here, the United States now moves the Honorable Justices of this District Court of Columbia for Loretta E. Lynchto show cause why Extraordinary Writs of Mandamus should not issue, commanding that Circuit Court to perform ‑‑ with all deliberate speed ‑‑ all duties owed to Appellant and/or Committee and Oversight.

• The United States moves for said ORDER, on the strengths of this PETITION and of the official records that are now before this District Court of Columbia, to reinstate a cause erroneously dismissed.

• That process ISSUE AGAINST Loretta E. Lynch be cired to appear and answer the allegatioin of this Complaint.

• Issue a Writ in the nature of Quo Warranto to issue upon Loretta E. Lynchin her official capacity as United States Attorney General to demonstrate by what lawful authorities each claims to preside as the United States of American Attorney General .
• All premises having been duly considered, Intervenor respectfully requests this honorable Court to issue a routine ORDER to the U.S. Department of Justice Loretta E. Lynchto show cause why she should not be held in criminal and/or civil contempt of court.
• To appoint Special Prosecutors and/or issue arrest warrants.

• That this Court liberally construe the RICO laws and thereby find and/or declare that all Defendants have associated with a RICO enterprise of persons and of other individuals who were associated in fact, all of whom did engage in, and whose activities did affect, interstate and foreign commerce in violation of the RICO law at 18 U.S.C. 1962(c) (Prohibited activities).

• That this Court liberally construe the RICO laws and thereby find that all Defendants have conducted and/or participated, directly or indirectly, in the affairs of said RICO enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity in violation of the RICO laws at 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961(5) (“pattern” defined) and 1962(c) supra.

• That all Defendants and all of their directors, officers, employees, agents, servants and all other persons in active concert or in participation with them, be enjoined temporarily during pendency of this action, and permanently thereafter, from associating with any RICO enterprise of persons, or of other individuals associated in fact, who do engage in, or whose activities do affect, interstate and foreign commerce.

• That all Defendants and all of their directors, officers, employees, agents, servants and all other persons in active concert or in participation with them, be enjoined temporarily during pendency of this action, and permanently thereafter, from conducting or participating, either directly or indirectly, in the conduct of the affairs of any RICO enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity in violation of the RICO laws at 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961(5) and 1962(c) supra.

• That if Defendant  cannot be found within this District then all of their property within this istrict be attached in the sum of $________________________________, with interest thereon and cost, the sum sued for in this complaint;

• That judgment be entered against the dfenant in the sum of $_________________together with interest and costs; and

• If for any reason it is alleged and/or found that Plaintiff is not entitled to the attachment of the Dfenants property under Admirality principle of foreign attachment, then in the, Plaintiff invokes the rovision of Section 6201 to 6226 of the New Yor CPLR(and/or similar “50 State laws”).
•  
•  
•  
• Title 18 U.S.C. §§ 2(a), 2(b), 1341, 1343, 1346, 1952, 1956, 1957,
• 2314, and 2315.
• ate and prays that this Court order the attachment of said property pruusant ot he aforesaid provovision of CPLR and FRCP 4(e) and Rule B(1) of the Supplenmtnal Rules for certain Admarility and Maritime claims: and
• That Plaintiff April have such other and further relief as in lawq and justice tit April be entitle to receive.

Wherefore, Plaintiff prays;

1.  That process in due form of law, according to the practices of this Honorable Court in causes of admirality and maritime jurisprudence, April issue agains the stem ship, her enginces, tacke appearl. Etc. and that all person having or claiming any interest therein be citized to apper and answer under oath, all and singular the matters aforesaid; that Plaitniff have a deree for its damaged aforesaid, with interest and cost; and that the steamship__________be condemned and sld to stisfy plaintiff decree;
2. That process in due form of law April issue against B citing it to appear and answer, under oath, all and singular, the matters aforesaid;
3. That the Court order, adjudge and decree that Plaitnifff have a decree against B for claim asserted gy plaintiff herein tooether with interest and costs and 
4. That Plaintiff have such other and further relief as April be proper and that this Court s compettnet ot grnt.
5.  

That Plaintiff have such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, under the full range of relevant circumstances which have occasioned the instant action.  Judgment WRIT OF ATTACHMENT in the amount of Plaitniffs damages, tighter with interest thereon form the rrespective dates due, cost, disbursements, and reasonable attorney fees.

1. That process in due form of law according to the practice of this court in cases of admirality and maritime jurisdiction April issue against the Defendant cititng it to apprear and answer all the matters described in this complaint.Plaintiff have such other and further relief in the premises as in law and justice in April be entitled to receive.

SCHEDULE[DESIGNATION OF SCHEDULE]

1.  Defendant’s  Status and addresss:
2. A. Unpon information and belief and at all times hereinafter mentioned, Defendant Barak H. Obama(AKA Barry Soertoes)  class representative was a [type of legaly entity]authorized under the laws of the United States Constition, with offices and a place of business at [Obama address]

DETAILS OF THE _________(S)

1.  Bill of Lading No.{ number of bill} dated {dated of bill of lading – 1993 thru  present] from [name of citiy], [name of county] to [name of city], [name of state] on the vessel [name of vessel], [one(1) container SAID TO CONTAIN: [description of contents], at the applicable tariff charge of $____________dollar amount of ttarriff charge EXhits { of exhibit}

Amount Paid:                                                                        Amount Due:____________

                                         SUMMARY OF DAMAGES

Summary of Reasonable Counsel’s Fees:          TBA

Summary of Consequential Damages:              TBA

Summary of Actual Damages (partial list):

     unpaid professional invoices:        $    10,000.000000000000000

     triple damage multiplier (3x):       $    325,050.0000000000000000

     copyright infringements, actual:     $163,800,000.00000000000000

     triple damage multiplier (3x):       $491,400,000.0000000000000000

Subtotal:                     $11111,310,833,400.00

     TOTAL DAMAGES (minimum):           $5,243,333,600.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

COMES NOW SHARON[DAVIS- ABUSALEM]BRIDGEWATER VIA “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PEOPLE OF THE 50 STATES(AND/OR HUMANITY)AND CLERK, JUDGE, JURY, PROSECUTOR, “U.S. MARSHAL”(18 U.S. Code § 3053 – Powers of marshals and deputies” AND/OR 8 U.S. Code § 566) PURUSANT TO AND EXECUTIONER PURSUANT TO LEGAL RIGHT VIA THE RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATON ACT(RICO) AND/OR ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME LAW GIVE NOTICE OF FORFEITURE OF ALL TANGIBLE AND INTANGIBLE PROPERTY(INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ALL “SECRET” CONCENTRATION CAMPS, “BOX RAILROAD-TRACK TRAIN CARS FOR THE TRANSPORTATION OF “THE FINAL HOLOCAUST VICTIMS,” GUILLOTINES, FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT(FEMA) CASKETS “MILLIONS” – SEE BELOW)YESHUA/JESUS CHRIST, REPRESENTATIVE OF THE TWELVE TRIBES OF ISRAELAPPEARS BEFORE “THE GOD OF THE EARTH” JACOB ROTHCHILD(SATAN’S REPRESENTATIVE – THE GOD OF THIS EARTH, THE THIRTEENTH BLOOD LINES, SATANIST, FATHER OF LIES, DECEPTION, CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD THE TWO SHARON[DAVIS-ABUSALEM] BRIDGEWATER VIA”THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR(A WOMEN AND VICTIM OF TRUMP, GARLAND, BIDEN, HARRIS, OBAMA “U.S. GOVERNMENT STATE ACTORS” CONTINUAL VIOLENCE AND OPPRESSION, RENDERED DISABLED BY THEIR HEINOUS ACTS OR OMISSION FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING TO JAN. 1, 2009 AND FURTHER CONTINUING THRUINTENTIONAL” CONTINUAL VIOLENCE AND OPPRESSION BY PRESENT)AND THE SHARON[DAVIS-ABUSALEM] BRIDGEWATER VIA”THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR(A )(SEE REVELATION 12 – ALSO SEE AMERICA JUDGED ON THIS WEBSITE– SEPTEMBER 23, 2017) BEFORE, STATUE OF LIMITATIONS TOLLED

THE CLAIM

NOTICE OF ADJUDIFICATION, OF CONVICTION, JUDGMENT AND SENTENCING AS FOLLOWS:

IT IS DECREED, ORDED AND AJUJECTS THAT ALL ALL PRESIDENTS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT ARE ALL GUILTY OF TREASON, RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY AND, ALL ILLEGALLY UPURPS PUBLIC OFFICE

ALL WRITS, OPINION, JUDGMENTS ORDERS ARE NULL AND VOID AND WITHOUT ANY LEGAL EFFECT, CONTRACTS WITH THE ENEMY ARE

DECREE, ENJOINS AND RESTRAIN BIDEN, VIA ARREST, AND IMPRISONMENT

ARREST WARRANTS IN REM

INJUNCTION AND ARREST WARRANT FOR BIDEN HERE(18 U.S.C. section 912, treason, racketeering conspiracy, genocide violation ofthe number

Biden aobstrcution of justice , trump, garland, biden and the marogo raid special master – aiding and betting18 U.S.C. 2382 – jan. 6,

https://thefederalist.com/2022/09/06/special-master-order-reveals-bidens-direct-involvement-in-trump-raid-and-six-other-bombshells/

degreed that all inflitrate the racketeer u.s. presidental ecetions via null and void and without any leady e

Adjudications are by their nature retroactive applications of the law.

ATTACHMENT – ARREST WARRANTS HERE

THE CLAIM

(AGAINST THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP)

(A public private/partnership)

EXH.A

JOE BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS, DONALD TRUMP, MICK PENCE, ET AL KNOWINGLY COMMITTED CRIMINAL ACTS, & ACTED IN JOINT PARTICIPATION GRANTED CHINA SOVERIEGNTY OVER THE UNITED STATES TO ENSLAVE AND/OR BEHEAD ALL WHO DO NOT WORSHIP SATAN(“LITERALLY”)

.

BIDEN AND HARRIS CONSPIRED WITH ONE OR MORE MERRICK GARLAND, XI JIPING, RUSSIA PUTIN, DONALD TRUMP AND WILLIAM BARR TO DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES IS EQUALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR REBELLION AND/OR INSURRECTION IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S. Code § 2383(SEE BELOW) CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD THE U.S.A. IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 371, VIOLATIONS OF THE NUREMBERG CODE, RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY, VIOLENT CRIMES IN AID OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY, FALSE IMPRISONMENT, FALSE ARREST, ILLEGALLY AND WRONGFULLY HOLDING THE OFFICE OF THE U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL BY FORCE AND WITHOUT THE RIGHT, PRETENDING TO BE AN OFFICER OR EMPLOYEE OF THE UNITED STATES IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 912 AND HOST OF OTHER CRIMES SEE BELOW: 18 U.S. Code § 912 – Officer or employee of the United States, A HOST OF OTHER CRIMES SEE BELOW:

COMES NOW THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY AND/OR RELATOR, INJURED AND DAMAGED IN BUSINESS, PERSON OR PROPERTY, RESTRAINED FROM INTERSTATE AND/OR FOREIGN COMMERCE FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO BIDEN’S TERM]JOE BIDEN & KAMALA HARRIS FAILURE TO PROTECT U.S. BOARDERS(AND HIS PREDECCESSORS ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, RACKETEERING IMMIRGARATION POLICIES ALL U.S. CE

& VIOLATING AND/OR COMMITTING ONE OR MORE SECTION 1961(1)(F)THE IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY ACT – RACKETEERING OFFENSES – BRING IN AND/OR HARBOR ILLEGAL ALIENS INDICTABLE UNDER THE INMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY ACT, I.E, SECTION 274

AID, ABET AND ASSIST ALIENS TO ENTER THE U.S.A. IN VIOLATION OF 277 or section 278 (relating to importation of aliens for immoral purposes) FOR FINANCIAL GAIN AS CODIFIED 8 U.S.C. §§ 1324, 1327 and 1328(FOR PROFIT)FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BORDERS AS FOLLOWS:

• VIOLATING AND/OR COMMITTING ONE OR MORE SECTION 1961(1)(F)THE IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY ACT – RACKETEERING OFFENSES – BRING IN AND/OR HARBOR ILLEGAL ALIENS INDICTABLE UNDER THE INMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY ACT, I.E, SECTION 274
• AID, ABET AND ASSIST ALIENS TO ENTER THE U.S.A. IN VIOLATION OF 277 or section 278 (relating to importation of aliens for immoral purposes) FOR FINANCIAL GAIN AS CODIFIED 8 U.S.C. §§ 1324, 1327 and 1328.

Biden(AN ILLEGAL IMMIGRATE – SEE OBAMA PAGE – ALL JUDGES DISMISSED ALL PLAINTIFFS ENTITLED “PLAINTIFFS” VS. BARAK H. OBAMA A.K.A BARRY SOERTOES EXACTLY LIKE THEY DISMISSED ALL MY COMPLAINT OVER THE COURSE OF NON-STOP CONTINUAUL ENTITLED SHARON BRIDGEWATER VS. BARAK H. OBAMA) DACA Obama Anemsty Program(IS NOW BIDEN AND HARRIS OPEN BORDER DOOR POLICY-SEE BELOW) constitute aiding and/or assisting certain aliens to enter the United States  in violation of one or more section 1324, 1327, and/or 1328

KAMALA HARRIS CO-CONSPIRATOR ACTS OR OMISSIONS CONSTITUTE AIDING, ABETTING OR CONSPIRING WITH JOE BIDE TO ALLOW IMMIGRATES IN TO THE U.S. TO FUTHER THE “INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL ENTERPRIZE AGENDA!!”

IMMIGRATION IN THE U.S.A. HIT A RECORD 46.2 MILLION(THE HIGHEST RECORDED IN U.S. HISTORY)IN ONE MONTH!!

CLIKC HERE FOR ARREST WARRANT AND INJUNCTION FOR KAMALA HARRIS AND GAVIN NEWSOME AS FOLLOWS

ALL UNDER ARREST ARE SENTENCE TO LIFE IN PRISION AND/OR THE DEATH PENALITY!!

MERRICK GARLAND THE U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL AND HEAD OF THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AND THE “HEAD(OVERSEE)AND” OF THE EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMRIGATION REVIEW. The primary mission of the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) is to adjudicate immigration cases by fairly, expeditiously, and uniformly interpreting and administering the Nation’s immigration laws. Under delegated authority from the Attorney General, EOIR conducts immigration court proceedings, appellate reviews, and administrative hearings.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

The Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) was created on January 9, 1983, through an internal Department of Justice (DOJ) reorganization which combined the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA or Board) with the Immigration Judge function previously performed by the former Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) (now part of the Department of Homeland Security). Besides establishing EOIR as a separate agency within DOJ, this reorganization made the Immigration Courts independent of INS, the agency charged with enforcement of Federal immigration laws. The Office of the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer (OCAHO) was added in 1987. In 2013, EOIR observed its 30th anniversary.

EOIR is also separate from the Immigration and Employee Rights Section in the DOJ Civil Rights Division and the Office of Immigration Litigation in the DOJ Civil Division.

As an office within the Department of Justice, EOIR is headed by a Director who reports directly to the Deputy Attorney General. Its headquarters are located in Falls Church, Virginia, about 10 miles from downtown Washington, DC.

MERRICK GARLAND ACTS OR OMISSIONS AND FAILURE TO “OVERSEE” HIS STAFF ACTS OR OMISSIONS AND/OR FAILURE TO MAINTAIN OUR BORDERS, CONSTITUTE

VIOLATING AND/OR COMMITTING ONE OR MORE SECTION 1961(1)(F)THE IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY ACT – RACKETEERING OFFENSES – BRING IN AND/OR HARBOR ILLEGAL ALIENS INDICTABLE UNDER THE INMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY ACT, I.E, SECTION 274

AID, ABET AND ASSIST ALIENS TO ENTER THE U.S.A. IN VIOLATION OF 277 or section 278 (relating to importation of aliens for immoral purposes) FOR FINANCIAL GAIN AS CODIFIED 8 U.S.C. §§ 1324, 1327 and 1328(FOR PROFIT)AND THE TWO WITNESSES(BOTH SHARON AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER) HAVE BEEN INJURED AND DAMAGED BY GARLAND ACTS OR OMISSIONS AND GARLAND IS LIABLE FOR DAMAGES

DECREE,ORDER, ENJOINS AND RESTRAIN MERRICK GARLAND FROM ILLEGALLY, UNLAWFULLY UPURPING THE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL WITHOUT THE RIGHT AS FOLLOWS:

KAMALA HARRIS(VICE PRESIDENT), NANCY PEOLOSI(SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE), CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR GAVIN NEWSOME, FLORIDA GOVERNOR RON DESANTIS AND/OR SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE NANCY PELOSI IMMIGRATION RACKETEERINGACTS OR OMISSIONS IMMIGRATION AND RACKETEERING(INJUNCTION AND ARREST WARRANT)!!

ACTS OR OMISSIONS AND FAILURE TO MAINTAIN OUR BORDERS, CONSTITUTE

VIOLATING AND/OR COMMITTING ONE OR MORE SECTION 1961(1)(F)THE IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY ACT – RACKETEERING OFFENSES – BRING IN AND/OR HARBOR ILLEGAL ALIENS INDICTABLE UNDER THE INMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY ACT, I.E, SECTION 274

AID, ABET AND ASSIST ALIENS TO ENTER THE U.S.A. IN VIOLATION OF 277 or section 278 (relating to importation of aliens for immoral purposes) FOR FINANCIAL GAIN AS CODIFIED 8 U.S.C. §§ 1324, 1327 and 1328(FOR PROFIT)AND THE TWO WITNESSES(BOTH SHARON AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER) HAVE BEEN INJURED AND DAMAGED BY GARLAND ACTS OR OMISSIONS AND GARLAND IS LIABLE FOR DAMAGES

CLICK HERE FOR GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA RON DESANTIS AND/OR SPEAKER OF THE HOUS NANCY PELOSI IMMIGRATION RACKETEERING INJUNCTION AND/OR ARREST WARRANTS!!

DECREE,ORDER, ENJOINS AND RESTRAIN GAVIN NEWSOME FROM ILLEGALLY, UNLAWFULLY UPURPING THE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL WITHOUT THE RIGHT AS FOLLOWS:

WITH F JOE BIDEN[KAMALA HARRIS, MERRICK GARLAND “CRIMINAL CLASS REPRESENTATIVES” ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, U.S. LEGISLATORS, “GOVERNORS, MAYORS, ETC. EMPLOYEES OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT,” MAJOR CORPORATIONS, AND FOREIGN OFFICIALS FOR THEIR ACTS OR OMISSIONS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT”] ADOPTION OF DONALD TRUMP, ET AL SCHEME TO DEFRAUD BOTH SHARON AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER OUT OF MONEY AND/OR PROPERTY WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW), USED THREAT, COERCION, DECEPTION TO TRICK ONE OR BOTH WITNESSES TO TAKE THE COV-19 INJECTION(IN VIOLATION OF THE NUREMBERG CODE)ISSUED EXECUTIVE ORDER 14067 TO DO AWAY ALL CASH(STEAL ALL OUR CASH IN THE BANK AND FORCE US TO BUY ONLY WHAT THEY APPROVE – “ENSLAVEMENT”

-CLICK HERE-VERY IMPORTANT

TWO WITNESSES(ALL. U.S. CITIZENS AND/OR HUMANITY)”ALL” OUR HARD EARN MONEY IN THE BANK[ALL RETIREMENT FUNDS, 401K’S, MUTUAL FUNDS “EVERYTHING”] FORCE THE TWO WITNESSES(ALL U.S. CITIZENS AND HUMANITY) US TO COMPLY WITH WHATEVER THEY WANT, & PROPERTY AND ENSLAVE US BY USING A DIGITAL DOLLAR-“CUT ON OR OFF”

AT WILL BY THE U.S. GOVERNMENT!!

FOR ILLEGAL, UNLAWFUL SCHEME TO “STEAL” THE

video here – central bank digital currencies: freedom dies!

BIDEN GRANTS(ATTEMPTS)TO U.S. SOVERIGNTY TO CHINA A COUNTRY(“THAT DO NOT NOT BELIEVE IN HUMAN RIGHTS”) GOING BANKRUPT SEE BELOW:

FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE BIDEN GIVES OR ATTEMPTS TO GIVE CHINA HANDING OVER U.S. NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY & OVER ULTIMATE CONTROL OF AMERICA’S HEALTH CARE SYSTEM(OBAMACARE) IS Mass surveillance in China,”Predictive Policing,” China social credit system, China Cashless Society which, COLLECT MEN AND WOMEN DNA TO INPUT IN A SUPERCOMPUTER VIA COV-19 TEST KITS SENT TO HOSPITAL AND/OR LABS

https://www.republicworld.com/world-news/rest-of-the-world-news/china-involved-in-illegal-gene-harvesting-dna-collection-of-uyghurs-iffras-report.html

https://www.thetrumpet.com/24057-why-is-china-collecting-american-dna

https://www.geneticsandsociety.org/article/china-collecting-dna-tens-millions-men-and-boys-using-us-equipment

https://www.republicworld.com/world-news/rest-of-the-world-news/china-involved-in-illegal-gene-harvesting-dna-collection-of-uyghurs-iffras-report.html

THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS BIDEN SUBMITTED TO THE WHO AS FOLLOWS:

ALSO, BIDEN GIVES CHINA ACCESS TO THE U.S. POWER GRID!!

-CLICK HERE-

– CHINA GOT ‘the two witnesses ” and/or humanity DNA VIA U.S. SUPREME GRANTS COLLECTION OF “ALL dna WITHOUT PROBALBE CAUSE – SEE BELOW U.S. SUPREME COURT ORDER) parallel with Biden’s March 9, 2022 Digital Forms of Currency

In the United States, there are both federal and state laws prohibiting treason. Treason is defined on the federal level in Article III, Section 3 of the United States Constitution as: “only in levying War against [the United States], or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.” Most state constitutions include similar definitions of treason, specifically limited to levying war against the state, “adhering to the enemies” of the state, or aiding the enemies of the state, and requiring two witnesses or a confession in open court.

COVID “PLANDEMIC” “MODELED AFTER THE WORLD ECONOMIC CRISIS 1929-1939.(CURRENT STOCK MARKET MANPULATION SETTING THE STAGE FOR COLLAPSE OF THE STOCK MARKET/WALL STREET) SIMILAR TO LARGE-SCALE UNEMPLOYMENT, SOCIAL DISLOCATION WHICH CONTRIBUTED TO THE RISE OF NAZISM IN GERMANY AND ADOLF HITLER, AND THE POPULATRITY OF COMMUNISM(PEOPLE WHERE MOR ACCEPTANC – AND NAZI SOCIAL DISTANCING) IT PARALELL WITH “MASS LARGE SCALE UNEMPLOYMENT” SOCIAL DISLOCATION AND THE RISE AND/OR ACCEPTANCE VIA THE COVID “PLANDEMIC” SAME WITH THE THE PANDEMIC CAUSE GREAT DEPRESSION

CONSOLIDATE WITH COMMUNIST CHINA, PREDICTIVE POLICING, DO A “GREAT RESET”

CONCEALED KNOWN FACTS THEY WERE UNDER A DUTY TO DISCLOSED, USED TRICK SCHEME AND COERCION TO “FORCE” ONE OR BOTH WITNESSES TO TAKE AND COV-19 INJECTIONS, BY BIDEN MANDATES IN WHICH ALL ANIMINAL DIED IN STUDIES AND VIOLED THE NUREMBERG CODE REFERRED TO THE TWO WITNESSES(AND HUMAN BEINGS – “HUMANITY”) AS “HACKABLE ANIMALS!!”

The Nuremberg Code (1947)

Permissible Medical Experiments

The great weight of the evidence before us to effect that certain types of medical experiments on human beings, when kept within reasonably well-defined bounds, conform to the ethics of the medical profession generally. The protagonists of the practice of human experimentation justify their views on the basis that such experiments yield results for the good of society that are unprocurable by other methods or means of study. All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:

1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.
   
   The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results justify the performance of the experiment.
4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability or death.
8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
9. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
10. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.

-CLICK HERE-

VIA ADMARILTY AND/OR MARITIME LAW, BURIFICATION OF TRIAL, AND NOTICE OF CONVICTION AND SENTENCE AND ALL se concurrent jurisdiction over admiralty cases in which plaintiffs seek traditional common law remedies)- AND ADJUDICATION OF IN PERSONAM(AND/OR QUI ADMIRALTYPROPERTY IS FORFEITED TO “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR AS FOLLOWS, “TAKING SATAN’S JOB IN HEAVEN(AS CHIEF MUSICIAN, PRAISE AND WORSHIP OF THE HEAVENLY CREATOR)TAKING ALL OF SATAN MONEY, FORFEITED BY PRIDE, WRONG :ELOW)YESHUA/JESUS CHRIST, REPRESENTATIVE OF THE TWELVE TRIBES OF ISRAELAPPEARS BEFORE “THE GOD OF THE EARTH” JACOB ROTHCHILD(SATAN’S REPRESENTATIVE – THE GOD OF THIS EARTH, THE THIRTEENTH BLOOD LINES, SATANIST, FATHER OF LIES, DECEPTION, CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD THE TWO SHARON[DAVIS-ABUSALEM] BRIDGEWATER VIA”THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR(A WOMEN AND VICTIM OF TRUMP, GARLAND, BIDEN, HARRIS, OBAMA “U.S. GOVERNMENT STATE ACTORS” CONTINUAL VIOLENCE AND OPPRESSION, RENDERED DISABLED BY THEIR HEINOUS ACTS OR OMISSION FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING TO JAN. 1, 2009 AND FURTHER CONTINUING THRUINTENTIONAL” CONTINUAL VIOLENCE AND OPPRESSION BY PRESENT)AND THE SHARON[DAVIS-ABUSALEM] BRIDGEWATER VIA”THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR(A )(SEE REVELATION 12 – ALSO SEE AMERICA JUDGED ON THIS WEBSITE– SEPTEMBER 23, 2017) BEFORE, STATUE OF LIMITATIONS TOLLED

SEE BELOW DECLARATORY JUDGMENT, BI-LATERAL CLASS REPRESENTATIVES, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION, ARREST WARRANTS IN REM AND OTHER ADMIRALITY AND/OR MARITIME DOCUMENTS

(ON BEHALF OF MYSELF, MY SON JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER, U.S. CITIZENS, THE SAINTS OF GOD IN HEAVEN AND/OR OF “HUMANITY,” MEN AND WOMEN CREATED IN THE IMAGE OF GOD IN HEAVEN, YESHUA/JESUS CHRIST – GOD, THE 12 TRIBES OF ISRAEL (ON BEHALF OF JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER, U.S. CITIZENS AND/OR HUMANITY) A VICTIM AND FEDERAL WITNESS, INJURED AND DAMAGED IN BUSINESS, PERSON OR PROPERTY & RESTRAINED FROM INTERSTATE AND/OR FOREIGN COMMERCE FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT (ON BEHALF OF HERSELF, HER SON – THE SECOND WITNESS AND VICTIM OF A U.S. GOVERNMENT VICTIM AND FEDERAL WITNESS INJURED AND DAMAGED BY THE COV-19 INJECTION, RESTRAIN VIA “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL( AND/OR RELATOR A QUALIFIED FEDERAL BEING DULY)REPRESENTATIVE OF “HUMANITY,” MEN AND WOMEN CREATED IN THE IMAGE OF GOD IN HEAVEN, YESHUA/JESUS CHRIST – GOD, THE 12 TRIBES OF ISRAEL – JUDGE, JURY, PROSECUTOR, CLERK AND EXECUTOR, PURSUANT TO MY “COMMON LAW RIGHT VIA ADMARILTY AND/OR MARITIME LAW, BURIFICATION OF TRIAL, AND NOTICE OF CONVICTION AND SENTENCE AND ALL se concurrent jurisdiction over admiralty cases in which plaintiffs seek traditional common law remedies)- AND ADJUDICATION OF IN PERSONAM(AND/OR QUI ADMIRALTYPROPERTY IS FORFEITED TO “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR AS FOLLOWS, “TAKING SATAN’S JOB IN HEAVEN(AS CHIEF MUSICIAN, PRAISE AND WORSHIP OF THE HEAVENLY CREATOR)TAKING ALL OF SATAN MONEY, FORFEITED BY PRIDE, WRONG :

COMES NOW SHARON[DAVIS- ABUSALEM]BRIDGEWATER VIA “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PEOPLE OF THE 50 STATES(AND/OR HUMANITY)AND CLERK, JUDGE, JURY, PROSECUTOR, “U.S. MARSHAL”(18 U.S. Code § 3053 – Powers of marshals and deputies” AND/OR 8 U.S. Code § 566) PURUSANT TO AND EXECUTIONER PURSUANT TO LEGAL RIGHT VIA THE RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATON ACT(RICO) AND/OR ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME LAW GIVE NOTICE OF FORFEITURE OF ALL TANGIBLE AND INTANGIBLE PROPERTY(INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ALL “SECRET” CONCENTRATION CAMPS, “BOX RAILROAD-TRACK TRAIN CARS FOR THE TRANSPORTATION OF “THE FINAL HOLOCAUST VICTIMS,” GUILLOTINES, FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT(FEMA) CASKETS “MILLIONS” – SEE

, BURIFICATION OF TRIAL, AND NOTICE OF CONVICTION AND SENTENCE AND ALL se concurrent jurisdiction over admiralty cases in which plaintiffs seek traditional common law remedies)- AND ADJUDICATION OF IN PERSONAM(AND/OR QUI ADMIRALTYPROPERTY IS FORFEITED TO “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR AS FOLLOWS, “TAKING SATAN’S JOB IN HEAVEN(AS CHIEF MUSICIAN, PRAISE AND WORSHIP OF THE HEAVENLY CREATOR)TAKING ALL OF SATAN MONEY, FORFEITED BY PRIDE, WRONG :

AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT FOR THE PEOPLE OF THE “50 STATES” AND/OR “HUMANITY” VIA THE RACKETEERED ININGJ “U.S. MARSHAL”(18 U.S. Code § 3053 – Powers of marshals and deputies” AND/OR 8 U.S. Code § 566) PURUSANT TO AND EXECUTIONER PURSUANT TO LEGAL RIGHT VIA THE RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATON ACT(RICO) AND/OR ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME LAWMY “COMMON LAW RIGHT VIA ADMARILTY AND/OR MARITIME LAW 

PROSECUTOR, JUDGE, JURY(ONE OR MORE CLERK, U.S. MARSHAL)  //

TO THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE APPEALS TO THE SUPREME JUDGE OF THE WORLD(SEE LAST PARAGRAPH IN THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE – GOD IN HEAVEN – YESHUA/JESUS CHRIST)

(https://thefounding.net/americas-founding-philosophy-god-as-supreme-judge-lawgiver-king/)(NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW!! THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION IS THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND!)

AND HEREBY EXERCISE MY “COMMON LAW RIGHT” PURSUANT TO ADMIRALTY(LAW) AND MARTIME CLAIM APPEARS, AS “INTERNATIONAL” PROSECUTOR, JUDGE, JURY, “JUDGE AMERICA,”(CORRUPT PUBLIC OFFICIALS ACTING IN JOINT PARTICIPATION WITH THE “DRAGON-CHINA XI JINPING TO ENSLAVE AND DEFRAUD ALL U.S.

CITIZENS OUT OF MONEY AND/OR PROPERTY WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW”( – SEE BIDEN EXECUTIVE ORDER SEE REVELATION 12 – ALSO SEE AMERICA JUDGED ON THIS WEBSITE– SEPTEMBER 23, 2017) AND JUDGE, ARREST, U.S. PUBLIC “THE SATANIC INTERNATIONAL ADOLF HITLER INTERNATIONAL FINAL GLOBAL HOLOCAUST TEAM,” CHINA THE “DRAGON,” AKA KNOWN AS THE BROKE NAKED CLOWN XI JINPING, JOE BIDEN IN HIS “DEFACTO” CAPACITY AS PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES,

             

COMES NOW SHARON AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER VIA (TWO WITNESSES INJURED AND AND DAMAGED BY U.S. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES ONE OR MORE FRAUD, EXTORTION, ASSAULT & BATTERY, WIRE FRAUD, MAIL FRAUD, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, INJURED AND DAMAGED BY AN ILLEGAL IMMIGRATE[RAPE BY FRAUD & THEFT] VIA ONE OR MORE PRESDIENT FAILURE TO MAINTAIN U.S. BORDERS, CONSPIRACY TO ENGAGE IN A PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY, THE COV-19 INJECTION ) PURSUANT TO Article III, Section 3 OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION:

Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

JOE BIDEN IN HIS “DEFACTO CAPACITY AS PRESIDENT OF U.S.A., KAMALA HARRIS IN HER “DEFACTO CAPACITY AS VICE PRESIDENT OF THE U.S.A. MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS DEFACTO CAPACITY AS ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE U.S.A., ” “CRIMINAL RACKETEERING CLASS REPRESENTATIVES” ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, U.S. LEGISLATORS, “GOVERNORS, MAYORS, ETC. EMPLOYEES OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT,” MAJOR CORPORATIONS, ON OR ABOUT JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT OWED AND CONTINUES TO OWE ALLEGIANCE TO THE U.S.A. AND U.S. CITIZENS, AND THE DEFENDANTS AND/OR RESPONDENTS KNOWINGLY, INTENTIONALLY BETRAYS AND CONTINUES TO BETRAY THAT ALLEGIANCE BY LEVING WAR AGAINST THE U.S.A. GOVERNMENT AND GIVE AID OR COMFORT TO CHINA AND “ENEMY” OF THE U.S.A. THEIR ACTS OR OMISSIONS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT CONSTITUTE TREASON AS FOLLOWS:

(IT IS DEGREED, ORDERED AND ADJUDGE)

• BIDEN GRANTS CHINA AND THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION PRESIDENT(A MARXIST TERRORIST “LITERALLY”)SOVERI
• ONE OR MORE BIDEN, OBAMA AND TRUMP(PRESIDENTS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 THRU TO PRESENT TRAIN CHINESE TROOPS ON U.S. SOIL
• BIDEN SIGNS EXECUTIVE ORDER TO DIGITIZE THE U.S. DOLLAR(THE WORLD RESERDEFRAUD U.S. CITIZENS OUT OF ALL THEIR MONEY IN THE BANK AND FORCE U.S. CITIZENS INTO SLAVERY, TOTAL SURVIELLANCE, CONSOLIDATE WITH CHINA’S CASHLESS SOCIETY SURVIELLENCE SYSTEM AND CHINA’S SOCIAL CREDIT SYSTEM(COMING SOON TO AMERICA) TO CONTROL AND ENSLAVE
• BIDEN AND/OR TRUMP GIVE CHINA ACCESS TO POWER GRID
• China is buying up all U.S. land and our 50 States legislator have don “nothing” but talk, China’s presence in the American food system poses a national security risk
• ON OR MORE BIDEN(AND PREDESSORS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO HIS TERM SALE THE STATE OF HAWAII AND CALIFORNIA TO CHINA
• China’s Latest Land Purchase Could Pose Major U.S. Security Risk
• TRUMP
• CHINA DRAINING U.S. RESOURCES, DEPLETING U.S. WATER https://news.wttw.com/2018/03/19/foxconn-seeks-7m-gallons-lake-michigan-water-daily
• CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR NEWSOME EITHER ATTEMPTED TO AND/OR SPEND ONE BILLION DOLLARS ON “MASK” VIA A FAKE PANAMIC

FOR CONSPIRING WITH “THE INTERNATIONAL HILTER NAZI TERRORIST GROUP(FOR ONE OR MORE DURESS, COERCION, FRAUD, DECEPTION, RESTRAINT, CONSPIRACY TO RESTRAIN INTERSTATE AND FOREIGN COMMERCE TO ENSLAVE AND COMMIT GEONOCIDE, TO FORCE “HUMANITY” AND/OR THE TWO WITNESSES TO TAKE “THE COVID DEATH JAB” IN VIOLATIONS OF THE NUREMBERG VIOLATIONS OF THE)” – GEORGE H. BUSH AND PREDESSORS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT INCLUDING GEORE W. BUSH FOR HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS, RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY, IMMIGRATION OFFENSE ETC.

HUNDREDS AND/OR THOUSAND HAVE STARTED CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE PERPETRATORS FOR INSTANCE DR. ROBERT FUELLMICH, AND COUNTLESS OTHERS HAVE STARTED CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE “INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL RACKET” BUT ARE UNABLE TO JUDGE AND/OR SENTENCE(AND/OR “JAIL”) THE PERPATRATORS BECAUSE THEY LACK STANDING – SEE BELOW FOR DEFINTION OF STANDING

GOD GRANTS HIS SERVANTS THE TWO WITNESS FULL POWER AND AUTHORITY TO ARREST, EXTRADITE, JUDGE, PROSECUTE AND FORFEIT ALL THE CO-CONSPIRATORS ASSETS AS FOLLOWS:

INCLUDE STATEMENT HERE

THE PRIMARY PERPETRATORS ARE AS FOLLOWS:

COMES NOW SHARON[DAVIS- ABUSALEM]BRIDGEWATER VIA “THE 50 STATES EX REL PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR(ON BEHALF OF MY SON JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER THE SECOND WITNESS, U.S. CITIZENS “THE PEOPLE OF THE 50 STATES” AND/OR “HUMANITY, “REPRESENTATIVE YESHUA/JESUS CHRIST THE CREATOR OF ENTIRE UNIVERSE – GOD IN HEAVEN, THE TWELVE TRIBES OF ISRAEL) “CAREER OFFENDER AND CRIMINAL,” “THE GOD OF THE EARTH” JACOB ROTHCHILD, OWNER AND CONTROLLER OF MOST IF NOT ALL GLOBAL CENTRAL BANKS, ALL MILITARIES(SATAN’S REPRESENTATIVE –

JACOB ROTHCHILD AND HIS PREDESSORS CONTROL AND/OR OWNS ALL WORLD – CONTROL THE MONEY SUPPLY, CONTROL ALL “WARS” AND WHO RECEIVES WHAT AND WHEN, THE UKRAINE/PUTIN WAR IS A “FAKE” SHAM WAR TO DISTRACT “HUMANITY” ATTENTION FROM WHAT IS REALLY GOING ON BEHIND THE SCENE. “TA

(JACOB ROTHCHILD, “THE ROCKEFELLER’S AND THEIR ASSOCIATES ALL LIABLE FOR DAMAGES AND FORFEIT PROPERTY TO “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR” – SEE THE REST OF THIS WEBPAGE)

LUCIFERIAN, SATANIST “LITERALLY”- ADVERSARY AND REBEL OF THE MOST HIGH GOD IN HEAVEN, REPRESENTATIVE OF THE THIRTEENTH BLOOD LINES(MIMICKED AFTER THE 12 TRIBES OF ISRAEL), SATANIST, FATHER OF LIES, EVIL, DECEPTION, SLANDERER, PRINCE OF DARKNESS(PRINCE OF IGNORANCE & RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL PAIN AND SUFFERING IN THE WORLD, ALL WARS)HATER OF ALL MEN CREATED IN THE IMAGE OF GOD IN HEAVEN INCLUDING MUSLIMS, HINDU’S, CHRISTIANS ETC. WHO JOB IS TO CREATE DIVISION AMONG TO MAKE GROUPS OF PEOPLE TO DISAGREE AND FIGHT WITH EACH OTHER SO THEY WILL NOT JOIN TOGETHER IN HARMONY TO DIVIDE AND MAINTAIN CONTROL AND ENSLAVE divide and conquer, COMMIT GENOCIDE, KILL, STEAL AND DESTROY(HIS CO-CONSPIRATORS INTERNATIONAL HEADS OF STATE)

ALL COMMITTED CRIMES OF COVID – 19 BIOLOGICAL WARFARE, (B) Any property, real or personal, within the jurisdiction of the United States, constituting, derived from, or traceable to, any proceeds obtained directly or indirectly from an offense against a foreign nation, or any property used to facilitate such an offense, if the offense— (i) involves trafficking in nuclear, chemical, biological, or radiological weapons technology or material, or the manufacture, importation, sale, or distribution of a controlled substance (as that term is defined for purposes of the Controlled Substances Act), or any other conduct described in section 1956 (c)(7)(B);

(ii) would be punishable within the jurisdiction of the foreign nation by death or imprisonment for a term exceeding 1 year; and

(iii) would be punishable under the laws of the United States by imprisonment for a term exceeding 1 year, if the act or activity constituting the offense had occurred within the jurisdiction of the United States.

ALL REAL property, real or personal, which constitutes or is derived from proceeds traceable to a violation of section 215, 471, 472, 473, 474, 476, 477, 478, 479, 480, 481, 485, 486, 487, 488, 501, 502, 510, 542, 545, 656, 657, 670, 842, 844, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1014, 1028, 1029, 1030, 1032, or 1344 of this title or any offense constituting “specified unlawful activity” (as defined in section 1956 (c)(7) of this title), or a conspiracy to commit such offense.

(D) Any property, real or personal, which represents or is traceable to the gross receipts obtained, directly or indirectly, from a violation of— (i) section 666 (a)(1) (relating to Federal program fraud);

(ii) section 1001 (relating to fraud and false statements);

(iii) section 1031 (relating to major fraud against the United States);

(iv) section 1032 (relating to concealment of assets from conservator or receiver of insured financial institution);

(v) section 1341 (relating to mail fraud); or

(vi) section 1343 (relating to wire fraud),

if such violation relates to the sale of assets acquired or held by the the  [1] Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as conservator or receiver for a financial institution, or any other conservator for a financial institution appointed by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency or the National Credit Union Administration, as conservator or liquidating agent for a financial institution.

(E) With respect to an offense listed in subsection (a)(1)(D) committed for the purpose of executing or attempting to execute any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent statements, pretenses, representations or promises, the gross receipts of such an offense shall include all property, real or personal, tangible or intangible, which thereby is obtained, directly or indirectly.

(F) Any property, real or personal, which represents or is traceable to the gross proceeds obtained, directly or indirectly, from a violation of— (i) section 511 (altering or removing motor vehicle identification numbers);

(ii) section 553 (importing or exporting stolen motor vehicles);

(iii) section 2119 (armed robbery of automobiles);

(iv) section 2312 (transporting stolen motor vehicles in interstate commerce); or

(v) section 2313 (possessing or selling a stolen motor vehicle that has moved in interstate commerce).

(G) All assets, foreign or domestic— (i) of any individual, entity, or organization engaged in planning or perpetrating any any  [1] Federal crime of terrorism (as defined in section 2332b (g)(5)) against the United States, citizens or residents of the United States, or their property, and all assets, foreign or domestic, affording any person a source of influence over any such entity or organization;

(ii) acquired or maintained by any person with the intent and for the purpose of supporting, planning, conducting, or concealing any Federal crime of terrorism (as defined in section 2332b (g)(5)  [2] against the United States, citizens or residents of the United States, or their property;

(iii) derived from, involved in, or used or intended to be used to commit any Federal crime of terrorism (as defined in section 2332b (g)(5)) against the United States, citizens or residents of the United States, or their property; or

(iv) of any individual, entity, or organization engaged in planning or perpetrating any act of international terrorism (as defined in section 2331) against any international organization (as defined in section 209 of the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 (22 U.S.C. 4309 (b)) or against any foreign Government. [3] Where the property sought for forfeiture is located beyond the territorial boundaries of the United States, an act in furtherance of such planning or perpetration must have occurred within the jurisdiction of the United States. (H) Any property, real or personal, involved in a violation or attempted violation, or which constitutes or is derived from proceeds traceable to a violation, of section 2339C of this title.

(2) For purposes of paragraph (1), the term “proceeds” is defined as follows: (A) In cases involving illegal goods, illegal services, unlawful activities, and telemarketing and health care fraud schemes, the term “proceeds” means property of any kind obtained directly or indirectly, as the result of the commission of the offense giving rise to forfeiture, and any property traceable thereto, and is not limited to the net gain or profit realized from the offense.

(B) In cases involving lawful goods or lawful services that are sold or provided in an illegal manner, the term “proceeds” means the amount of money acquired through the illegal transactions resulting in the forfeiture, less the direct costs incurred in providing the goods or services. The claimant shall have the burden of proof with respect to the issue of direct costs. The direct costs shall not include any part of the overhead expenses of the entity providing the goods or services, or any part of the income ta

ALL EMPLOYED BY OR ASSOCIATED WITH AN ENTERPRISE ENGAGED IN, OR ACTIVITIES AFFECTED INTERSTATE OR FOREIGN COMMERCE & ALL CONDUCTED OR PARTICIPATED DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY IN THE CONDUCT OF THE “BIOLOGICAL WARFARE – GEONCIDE – TERRORIST GROUP” THROUGH A PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY OR COLLECTION OF UNLAWFUL DEBT IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C.A. § 1962(c)AND/OR CONSPIRED TO VIOLATE “THE RICO ACT(VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C.A section 1962(d) (RICO)SCHEME TO DEFRAUD BOTH SHARON AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER OUT OF MONEY AND/OR PROPERTY WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW) AND/OR “ATTEMPT” AND CONTINUE TO “ATTEMPT” TO KILL THE TWO WITNESSES WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW

CLAIMANT AND/OR PLAINTIFF INCORPORATE EXH. A AS FULLY SET FORTH HEREIN(SEE BELOW)

AND WITH A AFFIDIVANT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS COUNSEL FOR “THE 50 STATES AND/OR THE PEOPLE OF THE 50 STATES” AND BY OPERATING OF LAW – THE DISMISSED COMPLAINT ENTITLED SHARON BRIDGEWATER VS. HAYES VALLEY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP(SAN FRANCISCO SUPERIOR COURT COMPLAINT) BY OPERATION OF LAW IS “THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT” OPERATES AS AN “FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT”

APPEARANCE AS “INTERNATIONAL PROSECUTOR” FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU PRESENT

                                                      NUNC PRO TUNC

due to U.S. Government[Transnational and/or National Corporations and Public Officials their individuals capacities acting in joint participation discriminating against one and/or two witnesses based on race, class, disability, religion, socioeconomic status under the color of law, committing criminal acts against their business, person or property and/or defrauding,  & willful, U.S. Constitutional rights and violation of deprivation of human rights in violation of the declaration of human rightsand U.S. Constitutional rights ),

WHICH MEAN, “now for then,” and refers to changing back to an earlier date of an order, judgment or filing of a document. Such a retroactive re-dating requires a court order which can be obtained by a showing that the earlier date would have been legal, and there was error, accidental omission or neglect which has caused a problem or inconvenience which can be cured. Often the judge will grant the nunc pro tunc order ex parte (with only the applicant appearing and without notice). 

EXH. A

THE PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY

CLICK HERE FOR OTHER EXH.’S

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE 50 STATES AND/OR THE PEOPLE AND/OR THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER ARE NOT THE SAME IN ONE!!

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA(PUBLIC OFFICIALS IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITIES EMPLOYED BY THE GOVERNMENT) 

REPRESENTS THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT

AND “WE THE PEOPLE”(declare that the Constitution derives its power not from a king or a Congress, but from the people themselves upon which the entire Constitution depends) THE PEOPLE OF THE 50 STATES AND/OR THE PEOPLE AND/OR THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER “REPRESENTS” THE PEOPLE OF THE 50 STATES!!

FILES THIS PRAECIPE AND NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AS FOLLOWS:

NOTICE OF “RETROACTIVE” FORFEITURE OF OFFICE, PROPERTY AND ARREST WARRANTS, ALSO IT IS DECREED, ORDERED, AND ADJUDED THAT ALL EXECUTIVE ORDER OF GEORGE H. BUSH, WILLIAM BILL CLINTON, GEORGE W. BUSH, BARAK H. OBAMA, DONALD TRUMP AND JOE BIDEN FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT IS NULL AND VOID AND WITHOUT ANY LEGAL EFFECT, NOTICE OF RETROACTIVE ARREST WARRANTS FOR INTERNATIONAL “HEADS” OF STATE, UNITED NATION REPRESENTATIVE, WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION REPRESENTATIVE FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT!!

COMES NOW “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR” PURSUANT TO THE DECLRATION OF INDEPENDENCE DECLARE THAT THE U.S. GOVERNMENT “THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH, THE JUDICIAL BRANCH AND THE LEGISLATIVE BRANCH HAVE BECOME DESTRUCTIVE AND DECLARE THAT ALL PUBLIC OFFICIALS IS WORKING DIRECTLY WITH CHINA FORM A NEW GOVERNMENT PURSUANT TO THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE WHICH STATES, “That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.” COMES NOW PURSUANT TO MY DUTY AS A U.S. CITIZEN AND RIGHT, FILES THIS NOTICE OF RETROACTIVE AMENDMENT TO THE U.S. CONSTITUTION AND/OR FOLLOWS:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent(consent of the governed refers to the idea that a government‘s legitimacy and moral right to use state power is justified and lawful only when consented to by the people or society over which that political power is exercised. This theory of consent is historically contrasted to the divine right of kings and had often been invoked against the legitimacy of colonialism. Article 21 of the United Nations’ 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights states that “The will of the people shall be the basis of the authority of government”) of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

NOTICE AND AMENDMENT TO “STATE CONSTITUTION” ONE OR MORE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF FLORIDA, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF HAWAII AND STATE OF MICHIGAN

“RETROACTIVE” DECREED, ORDERED, ADJUDICATED THAT SHARON[DAVIS-ABUSALEM]BRIDGEWATER VIA “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT IS PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, ATTORNEY GENERAL, U.S. REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE 50 STATES, AND/OR GOVERNOR OF ONE OR MORE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF FLORIDA, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF HAWAII AND STATE OF MICHIGAN CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER FOR ALL MAJOR CORPORATIONS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO MICROSOFT, FACEBOOK, TELSA, THE U.S. FEDERAL RESERVE ETC.

RICO CASE STATEMENT

PLAINTIFF/CLAIMANT SEEKS FORFEITURE OF PROPERTY AS FOLLOW:

INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE U.S. FEDERAL RESERVE, ALL CENTRAL BANKS, INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND, THE WORLD BANK LOCATED IN WASHINGTON, D.C. PARENT ORGANIZATION – UNITED NATIONS(SUBSIDIARIES – INTERNATIONAL FINANCE CORPORATION)SILVER, PRECIOUS COINS, ALL GOLD, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO”GOLD TOLIET SEATS” LOCATED IN THE U.A.E. AND/OR SAUDIA ARABIA, OIL COMPANIES, ALL CYPOTOCURRENCIES AND ETC.

NOTICE OF RELATED CASES

(DISMISSAL OF 42 PLUS CASES FROM 2008 THRU TO 2019 IN VIOLATION OF BRIDGEWATER U.S. CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, ALL WHILE COMMITTING CRIMINAL ACTS AGAINST BOTH SHARON AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER ASSAULT(AND CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT ASSAULT), BATTERY, FALSE IMPRISIONMENT, FALSE ARREST, MALICIOUS PROSECUTION, WIRE FRAUD, MAIL FRAUD, THEFT, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE AND A HOST OF OTHER CRIMES -JUDICIAL RACKETEERING FROM 2008 AND CONTINUNING THRU TO PRESENT)

DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

VICTIM ORGANIZATIONAL STATEMENT

NOTICE TO ALL VICTIMS OF “INTERNATIONAL BIOTERRORIST BIOL PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTRNSHIPTHE COV-19 INJECTION”(DEATH JAB), VICTIMS OF PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP(U.S. GOVERNMENT AND MAJOR CORPORATIONS CENSORSHIP – VIOLATION OF THE TWO WITNESSES AND/OR U.S. CITIZENS 1ST AMENDMENT RIGHT TO FREE SPEECH VIA THE COV-19 INJECTIONS) – JACOB ROTHCHILD(“LEGAL” REPRESENTATIVE OF SATAN “LITERALLY”)COV-FRAUD, DECEPTION, RAPE, “EVERYTHING BAD”!

YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO:

• The right to be treated with fairness, dignity, sensitivity, and respect;
• The right to attend and be present at criminal justice proceedings;
• The right to be heard in the criminal justice process, including the right to confer with the prosecutor and submit a victim impact statement at sentencing, parole, and other similar proceedings;
• The right to be informed of proceedings and events in the criminal justice process, including the release or escape of the offender, legal rights and remedies, and available benefits and services, and access to records, referrals, and other information;
• The right to protection from intimidation and harassment;
• The right to restitution from the offender;
• The right to privacy;
• The right to apply for crime victim compensation;
• The right to restitution from the offender;
• The right to the expeditious return of personal property seized as evidence whenever possible;
• The right to a speedy trial and other proceedings free from unreasonable delay;
• The right to enforcement of these rights and access to other available remedies.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO ONE OR MORE

CERTIFICATION

42 USC Section, 2000a-1, 2 and/or 3

42 USC Section 2000 a-3

 42 USC Section 2000 e-2 

 42 USC section 2000d  

42  USC section 2000b

 42 USC Section 2000h-1

 42 USC Section 2000h-2

 42 USC section 2000e-2

CERTIFICATE OF INTEREST PARTIES

A FINAL JUDGMENT JUDGMENT OF $1,000,000,000,000,000,000.00(Quadrillion) AND/OR A DECREE IN THIS PROCEEDING IS RENDERED IN THE FAVOR OF THE UNITED STATES VIA “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR” PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1964(D)[FOR INJURIES, “CURRENT DEATH & FUTURE DEATHS” OF COVID INJECTION VICTIMS – MASS GLOBAL GENOCIDE[HOLOCAUST], MASS “MILLIONS” DISPLACMENT OF PEOPLE BECAUSE OF WAR AND OTHER CLAIMS – SEE BELOW). ALSO A CRIMINAL PROCEEDING IS BROUGHT BY THE UNITED STATES VIA “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR” AND ALL DEFENDANTS(JACOB ROTHCHILD, THE U.S. FEDERAL RESERVE, MAJOR CORPORATIONS OFFICERS, DIRECTORS, ETC. BIDEN, HARRIS, FOREIGN OFFICIAL ET AL PURSUANT 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1964(D) AND CLASS REPRESENTATIVES, ONE OR MORE JOE BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS, AND/OR MERRICK GARLAND ON BEHALF OF ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICE, ET AL IS ESTOP FROM DENYING THE ESSENTIAL ALLEGATIONS OF THE CRIMINAL OFFENSE IN THIS CIVIL PROCEEDING BROUGHT BY THE UNITED STATES VIA “THE 50 UNITED STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR!!

CLICK HERE FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT

INTRODUCTION

THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR bifurcate stages of criminal trial, sentencing, criminal forfeiture of all tangible and intangle property, CRIMINAL PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP ________________________________________________________________________________________brings chares against one or more Joe Biden, Barak H. Obama, Donald Trump, major corporations, et al with violation of the Racketeered Influenced and Corrupt Organization act for having intentionally,  _______,  Treason, conspired to overthrow the US Government, terrorism usurpation of public office of the United States President(AND OTHER PUBLIC OFFICES),     An actual controversy exist between Merrick Garland the U.S. Attorney General

and Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, all committed mail fraud, extortion and a host of other unlawful acts against my business, Temporary restraining order, the rights of the the “50 States”  Plaintiffs to books, documents, as private attorney general and standing to obtain relief,

For conspiracy statutes which do not require proof of an overt act, such as RICO (18 U.S.C. § 1961) or 21 U.S.C. § 846, the government must allege and prove that the conspiracy continued into the limitations period. The crucial question in this regard is the scope of the conspiratorial agreement, and the conspiracy is deemed to continue until its purpose has been achieved or abandoned. See United States v. Northern Imp. Co., 814 F.2d 540 (8th Cir. 1987); United States v. Coia, 719 F.2d 1120 (11th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 973 (1984).Retroactive law as a law
that, in respect to past transactions or considerations, does one of the following:
• takes away or impairs vested rights acquired under existing laws
• creates a new obligation and imposes a new duty
• attaches a new disability
retroactive statutes, finding that a retroactive
statute is a law that:
• intended to affect transactions that occurred, or rights that accrued, before the law
became operative; and
• ascribes effects to the transactions or rights not inherent in their nature, in view of the
law in force at the time they occurred.
The court focused on how the retrospective application of a law could destroy a right or create a
duty where one did not previously exist. Retroactive laws have a wide variety of applications,
including judicial and administrative procedures

In order to prove a Rico violation government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt  that #1 an enterprise existed(a public/private “transnational, international” bioweapons terrorist group – ongoing organization, formal or informal, with a common purpose and by evidence that various core personnel of the group functioned as a continuing unit) of a group of people informally associated together for the common purpose of engaging in a course of conduct which have a common purpose,  a core of personnel who function as a continuing unit, to defraud Sharon and/or James S. Bridgewater of money and/or property without from Jan. 1, 1993 and continuing thru to present. #2 And all Defendants are associated with or employed by the enterprise. #3 All the defendant knowingly willfully engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity and committed at least two incidents of racketeering activity that have the same or similar purposes, results, participants, victims or methods of commission or otherwise are interrelated by distinguishing characteristics, including a nexus to the same enterprise, and are not isolated incidents, against one or both Sharon and/or James S. Bridgewater – Two Witnesses and victim)and within five years after a prior incident of racketeering activity(“Racketeering activity” to commit, to attempt to commit, to conspire to commit, or intentionally aid, solicit, coerce or intimidate another person to commit crimes at the time of its commission, was a felony(attempted murder, theft, assault, battery, list) #4 All Knowingly conducted or participated in enterprise through pattern of racketeering 

The Plaintiff is a victim and Federal Witenss with first hand knowledge and will show and prove to this “”PUBLIC OPEN COURT” THAT JOE BIDEN(AND PREDECESSORS ARE GUILTY OF MULTIPLE CRIMES” OF WAR CRIMES, GENOCIDE, TREASON, RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY ETC. WHICH ESTABLISH MORE THAN PROBABLE

THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR bifurcate stages of criminal trial, sentencing, ________________________________________________________________________________________brings chares against one or more Joe Biden, Barak H. Obama, et al with violation of the Racketeered Influenced and Corrupt Organization act for having intentionally,  _______, Obamacare,  Treason, conspired to overthrow the US Government, terrorism usurpation of public office of the United States President(AND OTHER PUBLIC OFFICES),     An actual controversy exist between Merrick Garland the U.S. Attorney General

and Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, all committed mail fraud, extortion and a host of other unlawful acts against my business, emporary restraining order, the rights of the the “50 States”  Plaintiffs to books, documents, as private attorney general and standing to obtain relief,

In order to prove a Rico violation government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt  that #1 an enterprise existed(a public/private “transnational, international” bioweapons terrorist group – ongoing organization, formal or informal, with a common purpose and by evidence that various core personnel of the group functioned as a continuing unit) of a group of people informally associated together for the common purpose of engaging in a course of conduct which have a common purpose,  a core of personnel who function as a continuing unit, to defraud Sharon and/or James S. Bridgewater of money and/or property without from Jan. 1, 1993 and continuing thru to present. #2 And all Defendants are associated with or employed by the enterprise. #3 All the defendant knowingly willfully engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity and committed at least two incidents of racketeering activity that have the same or similar purposes, results, participants, victims or methods of commission or otherwise are interrelated by distinguishing characteristics, including a nexus to the same enterprise, and are not isolated incidents, against one or both Sharon and/or James S. Bridgewater – Two Witnesses and victim)and within five years after a prior incident of racketeering activity(“Racketeering activity” to commit, to attempt to commit, to conspire to commit, or intentionally aid, solicit, coerce or intimidate another person to commit crimes at the time of its commission, was a felony(attempted murder, theft, assault, battery, list) #4 All Knowingly conducted or participated in enterprise through pattern of racketeering 

The Plaintiff is a victim and Federal Witenss with first hand knowledge and will show and prove to this “”PUBLIC OPEN COURT” THAT JOE BIDEN(AND PREDECESSORS ARE GUILTY OF MULTIPLE CRIMES” OF WAR CRIMES, GENOCIDE, TREASON, RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY ETC. WHICH ESTABLISH MORE THAN PROBABLE CAUSE!! probable cause.

1

Section 1962(c) makes it a crime to conduct the affairs of an enterprise affecting interstate

or foreign commerce “through” a pattern of racketeering activity or through the alternative theory of collection of an unlawful debt.

Section 1962(d) makes it a crime to conspire to commit any of the three substantive RICO

offenses.

THIS IS A CRIMINAL CASE BROUGHT BY THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR “PROSECUTOR” VIA THE RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATION(WHICH PERMITS A PRIVATE PERSON INJURED AND DAMAGED TO “ACT” AS ATTORNEY GENERAL AND USE COMMON LAW REMEDIES VIA ADMIRALTY AND MARTIME LAW WHICH PERMITS A PRIVATE PERSON INJURED AND DAMAGED TO “ACT” AS ATTORNEY GENERAL AND USE COMMON LAW REMEDIES VIA ADMIRALTY AND MARTIME LAW. (BURIFICATION . (War Crimes, violations of the Nuremberg code, Genocide, Healthcare fraud, Treason, conspired to overthrow the US Government, conspiracy to engage in a pattern of racketeering activity to defraud the two witness(Sharon and/or James S. Bridgewater)out of money and/or property. In addition to illegal restraints in trade, conspiracy to restrain interstate and/or foreign commerce. Usurpation of public office of the United States President and multiple, multiple other crimes.

JURISDICTION

    

This “OPEN PUBLIC COURT” have jurisdiction via Admiralty and/or Maritime common law remedies in which the Claimant/Plaintiff(“THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEAWTER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL) have no other adequate remedies at law, for denial of court access, dismissal of 45 or more cases(judicial racketeering) and continued predicate acts as defined in 18 U.S.C. section 1961 conspiracy to restrain interstate and/or foreign commerce continued scheme to defraud two witnesses Sharon and/or James S. Bridgewater(Representatives of the 50 States and/or the people of the 50 states) out of money and/or property without due process of law(U.S. public officials acting in joint participation with Foreign Officials and Major Corporation to enslav

“Common Common Law Jurisdiction”

This admiralty and/or maritime claim “open court proceeding” have Common law jurisdiction for deprivation and denial of court access via 42 plus dismissed complaint of valid claims(judicial racketeering- see below related cases) of the two witnesses right to file a first amended complaint[pursuant to a Superior Court Judge Order see below (pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure every Plaintiff is allowed to file a first amended complaint “by right” without leave of the court –  plaintiff to amend their complaint one time within 21 days of serving the original complaint or at any point before the defendant answers – Rule 15 provides that the court should allow the plaintiff to amend the complaint when justice requires it)from August 4, 2008 and continuing thru present provides and this admiralty and/or maritime claim by operation of law is “the first amended complaint.” Congress allowed state courts to exercise concurrent jurisdiction over admiralty cases in which plaintiffs seek traditional common law remedies.

dismissal of all valid clurts in admiralty is therefore an amalgam of the general maritime law insofar as it is acceptable to the courts, modifications of that law by congressional amendment, the common law of torts and contracts as modified to the extent constitutionally possible by state legislation, and international prize law. This body of law is at all times subject to modification by the paramount authority of Congress acting in pursuance of its powers under the Admiralty and Maritime Clause and the Necessary and Proper Clause and, no doubt, the Commerce Clause, now that the Court’s interpretation of that clause has become so expansive. Of this power there has been uniform agreement among the Justices of the Court.

Admiralty and Maritime Cases.—Admiralty and maritime jurisdiction comprises two types of cases: (1) those involving acts committed on the high seas or other navigable waters, and (2) those involving contracts and transactions connected with shipping employed on the seas or navigable waters. In the first category, which includes prize cases and torts, injuries, and crimes committed on the high seas, jurisdiction is determined by the locality of the act, while in the second category subject matter is the primary determinative factor.⁹¹⁴ Specifically, contract cases include suits by seamen for wages,⁹¹⁵ cases arising out of marine insurance policies,⁹¹⁶ actions for towage⁹¹⁷ or pilotage⁹¹⁸ charges, actions on bottomry or respondentia bonds,⁹¹⁹ actions for repairs on a vessel already used in navigation,⁹²⁰ contracts of affreightment,⁹²¹ compensation for temporary wharfage,⁹²² agreements of consortship between the masters of two vessels engaged in wrecking,⁹²³ and surveys of damaged vessels.⁹²⁴ That is, admiralty jurisdiction “extends to all contracts, claims and services essentially maritime.”⁹²⁵ But the courts have never enunciated an unambiguous test which would enable one to determine in advance whether or not a given case is maritime.⁹²⁶ “The boundaries of admiralty jurisdiction over contracts—as opposed to torts or crimes—being conceptual rather than spatial, have always been difficult to draw. Precedent and usage are helpful insofar as they exclude or include certain common types of contract. . . .”⁹²⁷

Maritime torts include injuries against “ALL INTERNATIONAL HEADS OF STATE(FOREIGN OFFICIALS) IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITY” FOR JOINT PARTICIPATION WITH U.S. PRESIDENTS, MAJOR CORPORATIONS AND ONE OR MORE REAL ESTATE INVESTORS, WALL STREET INVESTORS AND MAJOR CORPORATIONS INVESTORS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT(and claim arising out of malicious prosecution, abuse of process, libel, slander, misrepresentation, deceit, or interference with contract rights and/or any claim based upon the exercise or performance or the failure to exercise or perform a discretionary function regardless – whether the discretion be abused – and they are not immune by Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976 (FSIA), 28 U.S.C. 1330, 1441(d), 1602 et seq., which provides that a foreign state and its agencies and instrumentalities are immune from the jurisdiction of federal and state courts in civil actions, subject to limited exceptions. ALL COMMITTED ACTS OF TERRORISM WHICH RESULT AND WILL CONTINUE TO RESULT IN PERSONAL INJURY AND/OR DEATH(and/or arbitrary deprivation of life -extrajudicial killing ) OF ONE OR BOTH WITNESSES – SHARON AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER ALL ARE “STATE SPONSOR TERRORIST AND/OR A STATE SPONSOR TERRORIST BIOLOGICAL WARFARE ENTERPRIZE” ACTING IN JOINT PARTICIPATION and provide material support or resources for such an act to each other to injure and harm the two witnesses(and/or humanity). International law prohibits the arbitrary deprivation of life, and extrajudicial killing. [t]errorism exception” provides that a foreign state that has been designated a state sponsor of terrorism is not immune from jurisdiction in certain civil actions for damages arising out of personal injury or death “caused by an act of * * * extrajudicial killing * * * or the provision of material support or resources for such an act”)  in which money damages are sought against a foreign state for personal injury or death, or damage to or loss of property, occurring in the United States and caused by the tortious act or omission of that foreign state or of any official or employee of that foreign state while acting within the scope of his office or employment, and acting in joint participation with U.S. Public Officials acting under the color or law to commit and continue to engage in a pattern of racketeering activity(violent crimes in aid of racketeering activity against the two witness in violation of 18 U.S. Code § 1959 – Violent crimes in aid of racketeering activity racketeering act

in which the action is based upon a commercial activity carried on in the United States by the foreign state; or upon an act performed in the United States in connection with a commercial activity of the foreign state elsewhere; or upon an act outside the territory of the United States in connection with a commercial activity of the foreign state elsewhere and that act causes a direct effect in the United States VIA ONE OR MORE COVID PANDEMIC – ILLEGAL RESTRAINTS IN TRADE, AND CONSPIRACY TO RESTRAIN COMMERCE AND/OR WHO WERE employed by or associated with any enterprise engaged in, or the activities of which affect, interstate or foreign commerce, to conduct or participate, directly or indirectly, in the conduct of such enterprise’s affairs through a pattern of racketeering activity or collection of unlawful debt. 18 U.S.C.A. § 1962(c) AND CAUSED THE TWO WITNESSES INJURIES AND DAMAGES!

This court has jurisdiction providing for declaratory and equitable and/or injunctive relief to prevent the deprivation under color of law of the “50 States,” rights, privileges, and immunities under the United States Constitution. Jurisdiction is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 28 USC sections 1333 to 1364, 2201, and 2202; 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983, 1985 and 1988 and the Constitution of the United States and more particularly the second ninth, tenth, and fourteenth amendments thereto. Further relief sought in this against racial discrimination, and/or discrimination based on religion, gender, disability, national origin, via the Class Plaintiff Bridgewater and thos similarly situated. (an international class/and/or national class of persons);  This court further have jurisdiction under Rule 23 and/or 28 USC section 1332 amounts in controversy exceeds $5,000,000 and one or more members of the class plaintiffs are citizens of different state from the defendants and/or one or more members of class plaintiffs and/or class defendants are citizens of a State and/or are citizens of a foreign state or subject of a foreign state. Class Representative Defendant Merrick is a citizen of the State of Delawas, Virginia and/or Maryland.  The Class Petitioner/Appellant/claimant Representative is a citizen of the State of Michigan.  There is complete diversity of Citizenship between Lynch and/or Bridgewater. (Class Representatives).This district Court also has jurisdiction to issue all writs necessary or appropriate in aid of its jurisdiction. 28 USC section 1651. Exceptional circumstances warrant the exercise of this court discretionay powers and adequate relief cannot be obtain in any other form from any other court. Also, the parties opposing the class has acted or refused to act on grounds generally applicable to the class, thereby making appropriate final injunctive relief or corresponding declaratory relief with respect to the class(CRIMINALS) as a whole. The questions of law or fact common to the members of the class predominate over any questions affecting individual members, and a class action is superior to other available methods for the fair and efficient adjudication of the controversy. The existence of intimidation and threats by the defendant class have and will deter potential plaintiffs from joining the suit as named plaintiffs, making class action status essential to ensure all victims receive justice. This Court have “common law jurisdiction for International Crimes, including but not limited to violations of the Nuremberg Code, War Crimes, Human rights violations, list

POOL OF REAL ESTATE INVESTORS

SCHEME TO DEFRAUD ALL U.S. CITIZENS, HUMANITY THE TWO WITENSSES AND/OR ANCESTORS

GENOCIDE OF CHRISTIANS LIVING IN THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE

(INCLUDING MURDER AND STARVATION)

Sometimes called the first genocide of the twentieth century, the Armenian genocide refers to the physical annihilation of Armenian Christian people living in the Ottoman Empire from spring 1915 through autumn 1916. There were approximately 1.5 million Armenians living in the multiethnic Ottoman Empire in 1915.

ROTHCHILD(AND CO-CONSPIRATORS) SCHEME TO DEFRAUD – ALL U.S. CITIZENS AND ALL!!

WOODROW WILSON – U.S. FEDERAL RESERVE ACT

National Security and Defense by Encouraging the Production, Conserving the Supply, and Controlling the Distribution of Food Products and Fuel” and became law on August 10, 1917

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Food_and_Fuel_Control_Act

What happened in Iran during World war 1?

At least 8–10 million Iranians out of a population of 18–20 million died of starvation and disease during the famine of 1917–1919. The Iranian holocaust was the biggest calamity of World War I and one of the worst genocides of the 20th century, yet it remained concealed for nearly a century.

IRAN DEAL

HITLER’S GOAL TO CHANGE MEN GENETIC MAKE – UP AND EXTERMINATE ALL RACES, AND ALL PEOPLE OTHER THAN “ARYAN” ALL WERE TARGETED FOR ANNIHILATION BY GERMANY(HITLER)

In addition to singling out Jews for complete annihilation, the Nazis targeted for discrimination and persecution, anyone they believed threatened their ideal of a ‘pure Aryan race’.

Nazi beliefs categorised people by race, and Hitler used the word ‘Aryan’ for his idea of a ‘pure German race’. The Nazis believed Aryan people were superior to all others. Their devotion to what they believed was racial purity and their opposition to racial mixing partly explains their hatred towards Jews, Roma and Sinti people (sometimes referred to as ‘Gypsies’) and black people. Slavic people, such as those from Poland and Russia, were considered inferior and were targeted because they lived in areas needed for German expansion.

The Nazis wanted to ‘improve’ the genetic make-up of the population and so persecuted people they deemed to be disabled, either mentally or physically, as well as gay people. Political opponents, primarily communists, trade unionists and social democrats, as well as those whose religious beliefs conflicted with Nazi ideology, such as Jehovah’s Witnesses, were also targeted for persecution.

Hundreds of thousands of lives were destroyed because of Nazi persecution, and many groups did not receive acknowledgement of their suffering until years after 1945.

(IRAN DEAL)

(IRAN DEAL )ETC.

WORLD WAR II

DURING WW2 – 1942-1943

IRAN STARVE IRANIAN CITIZENS(SEE WORLD WAR 1 & WORLD WAR III)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to navigationJump to search

Persian famine of 1942–1943
Country	Iran
Period	1942–1944
Total deaths	3-4 million (per Mohammad Gholi Majd)
Preceded by	1917–1919 famine

The Iranian famine of 1942–1943 refers to a period of major starvation that took place in Iran, which was under the rule of the Pahlavi dynasty. Iran at the time was occupied by the United Kingdom and Soviet Union despite being a neutral country in the Second World War.

“THE THIRD AND FINAL ANTI-CHRIST

(THE DIVERSE ANTI-CHRIST – ALL HEADS OF STATE VIA THE COV-19 INJECTION)

“ADOLF HITLER’S DAUGHTER” – ANGELA MERKEL(“HIDING” TO PREVENT PROSECUTION)CHANCELLOR OF GERMANY

“A ROTHCHILD”

MAJOR PLAYERS “ALL INTERNATIONAL HEADS OF STATE” AND MAJOR CORPORPORATIONS(public/private

HITLER’S GOAL TO CHANGE MEN GENETIC MAKE – UP AND EXTERMINATE ALL RACES, AND ALL PEOPLE OTHER THAN “ARYAN” ALL TARGETED VIA THE COV-19 INJECTION FOR ANNIHILATION BY GERMANY(HITLER’S DAUGHTER – LEFT)

ALL SOCIAL MEDIA COMPANIES, “BLOCK” REALITY AND WHAT’S REALLY GOING ON VIA THE COV-19 INJECTIONS AS FOLLOWS

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

BIDEN AND CO-CONSPIRATORS GOVERNOR CREATE AN AUTOPHERE OF RACIAL DIVISION(SEE HIS PREDECESSOR WILLLIAM BILL CLINTON “CREATES A TWO CLASS AMERICA – RICH AND POOR AND DELETES THE MIDDLE CLASS FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE TO CAUSE RACIAL TENSIONS AND DIVISIONS – OVER FOOD SHORTAGES TO INSTIGATE RACIAL WAR TO PERMIT CHINA TO COME IN AND TAKE OVER – SEE U.S. TRAIN – CHINESE TROOPS ON U.S. SOIL ON THIS WEBSITE

VIA THE COV-19 INJECTION AND/OR BECAUSE THEY KNOW I’M IN THE PROCESS OF GOING PUBLIC VERY SOON USES

DOJ

Arizona reportedly has “refurbished” its gas chamber and has spent more than $2,000 to acquire ingredients to execute prisoners with cyanide gas, the same gas used by the Nazis to murder more than one million men, women, and children during the Holocaust.

CHNA COLLECTS “HUMANITY” DNA VIA THE COVID SWAB AND OTHER “TEST(ANY AND ALL LAB TEST IN THE U.S. AND/OR GLOBALLY)TO INTO INTO A SUPERCOMPUTER(THE CHINESE GOVERNMENT forcibly collects biometric markers like fingerprints, facial images, and DNA of Xinjiang residents, where 12 million Uyghurs live)AND IS FORCIBLY COLLECTING “OUR” DNA WITH THE CORRPT GOVERNMENT HELP

CHINA COLLECTS MILLIONS OF BOYS DNA

CHINA WANTS YOU DNA AND MAY HAVE IT

BIDEN(OBAMA’S EXTENTION VIA OBAMACARE)CONSPIRES WITH CHINA IN VIOLATION OF NATIONAL SECURITY TO COLLECT “OUR” DNA(SEE BUSH – NOHIDE LAWS – BEHEADINGS, AND OBAMACARE CODE BEHEADING IN OBAMACARE HEALTH CARE LANGUAGE ON THIS WEBSITE)

TRUCKER CATCH U.S. GOVT. DESTROYING BABY FORMUA

https://www.bitchute.com/video/IcEkBEjjKsCG/

DARPHA REPLACE BABY FORMULA – WITH NANO TECH. FORMULA FROM EUROPE

https://www.theepochtimes.com/nestle-flying-baby-formula-to-us-from-europe-to-help-alleviate-shortages_4471741.html

nano-infant-formula-petition_57739Download

HITLER’S NAZI GERMANY “I.D. MARK” AS FOLLOWS:

BIDEN, HARRIS(AND PREDECESSOR FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUNG THRU TO PRESENT) ARE GUILTY OF TREASON.

NOTICE OF “RETROACTIVE” FORFEITURE OF OFFICE, PROPERTY AND ARREST WARRANTS, ALSO IT IS DECREED, ORDERED, AND ADJUDED THAT ALL EXECUTIVE ORDER OF GEORGE H. BUSH, WILLIAM BILL CLINTON, GEORGE W. BUSH, BARAK H. OBAMA, DONALD TRUMP AND JOE BIDEN FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT, CONSPIRED TO COMMIT OFFENSES AGAINST THE U.SA. CONSPIRED TO COMMIT TREASON AND/OR CONSPIRED TO DEFRAUD THE U.S.A. IT’S DEPARTMENT AND AGENCIES IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 371 AND ENGAGED IN A PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY. ALL “OFFICES” ARE FORFEITED ALL EXECUTIVE ORDER FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT ARE IS NULL AND VOID AND WITHOUT ANY LEGAL EFFECT, NOTICE OF RETROACTIVE ARREST WARRANTS FOR INTERNATIONAL “HEADS” OF STATE, UNITED NATION REPRESENTATIVE, WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION REPRESENTATIVE FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT!!

IT IS DECREED, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED THAT ALL WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION(ALL CONTRACTUAL RIGHTS), UNITED NATIONS – ORDERS, EMERGENCY ONE OR MORE COVID, MONKEY POX, “FLU” ETC. “HEALTH ORDERS” ARE NULL AND VOID AND WITHOUT ANY LEGAL EFFECT!!

MERRICK GARLAND CONSPIRED WITH ONE OR MORE JOE BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS, WILLLIAM BARR HIS PREDECESSOR, DONALD TRUMP AND/OR MIKE PENCE COMMITTED CRIMINAL ACTS

ALL CORRUPT!!

COMES NOW THE TWO WITNESSES STATE IN OPEN COURT, DECREE, ORDER, ADJUDGE(SENTENC THAT JOE BIDEN, DONALD TRUMP, MERRICK GARLAND ET AL IS GULITY OF TREASON IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S. Code § 2381 – Treason

FORFEITS ALL PROPERTY TO “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR AND BY OPERATION OF LAW FORFEITS PUBLIC OFFICE(SEE BELOW)

IN RE “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR

VS.

JOE BIDEN IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS U.S. PRESIDENT(CRIMINAL CLASS DEFENDANTS AND/OR RESPONDENT REPRESENTATIVE)THE WHITE HOUSE, U.S. CAPITOL BUILDING, THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, The Pentagon, “CRIMINAL” KAMALA HARRIS IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS VICE PRESIDENT “CRIMINAL” CLASS REPRESENTATIVE, MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL “CRIMINAL CLASS REPRESENTATIVE,

EXECUTIVE ORDER – TO DEFRAUD ALL U.S. CITIZENS OUT OF MONEY AND/PROPERTY FORCE U.S. CITIZENS INTO SLAVERY

on behalf of one or more

INCLUDE A LIST OF DEFENDANTS AND/OR RESPONDENTS HERE

https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2021/09/22/1039293816/covid-delta-variant-fda-commissioner

Food and Drug Adminstrator(FDA)Dr. Robert Califf  and/or Commissioner Stephen Hahn Hahn and FDA vaccine chief Peter Marks(and Predecessors from Jan. 1, 1993 and continuing thru to present)

The United States Federal Reserve, all Central Banks, all State Banks, Hayes Valley Limited Partnership, $1,000,000,000,000,000.00(Quadrillion )in currency(all currency including but not limited to all currency including the U.S. Dollar and/or Digital Dollar, the Chinese Yuan and/or digital yuan, Russian ruble and/or digital ruble, India rupee and/or digital rupee, etc. all cryptocurrency including but not limited to Bitcoin, USD Coin, King Charles III’s coin etc.) all tangible(including but not limited to The White House, The U.S. Department of Justice, The Department of Defense, The Supreme Court, The District Court of Columbia, The U.S. District Court of Appeals, All bank owned Real Estate[REO’s] Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac properties, McCormack Baron Salazar properties, SunAmerica Affordable Housing Partners properties etc. and intangible property(including but not limited to all types of Digital ledger Technology and/or Blockchains, Cern, ICANN, Petroleum, crude oil, fossil fuels, coal and natural gas, any and all contractual right affording a source of influence over an enterprise including but not limited to water rights via legal entitlement authorizing water to be diverted from a specified source, water, land, Papers, records, books, journals, ledgers, accounts, statements, memoranda, reports, invoices, work sheets, work papers, notes, transcriptions of notes, letters, correspondence, communications, abstracts, checks, diagrams, plans, blueprints, specifications, pictures, drawings, films, photographs, graphic representations, diaries, calendars, desk calendars, pocket calendars, lists, logs, publications, advertisements, press releases, facsimilies, newspapers, magazines, instructions, minutes, orders, bills, purchase orders, messages, resumes, summaries, for case, graphs, charts, appraisals, analytical records, reports, brochures, pamphlets, circulars, trade letters, agreements, contracts, letters of intent, telegrams, telexes, cables, recordings, audio tapes, magnetic tapes, visual tapes, transcripts of tapes or recordings, computer disks, tapes and cards, information stored in or accessible through computer or other information retrieval systems, including hard copies of electronic mail or information contained on computer hard drives, or any other writings or tangible or electronic things on which any handwriting, typing, printing, audio, visual, photographic or other forms of communication or information which are recorded or reproduced, goods and chattels, or credits and effects in the hands of garnishees to be named in the process ALL TANGIBLE AND INTANGLE PROPERTY, INCLUDING but not limited to intellectual property

• brands and logos
• product names
• inventions and products
• original software
• designs
• shape and appearance of a product
• music
• books
• poems
• paintings
• photography
• other kinds of creative work
•  ICANN

• patents
• trade marks
• copyright
• designs

NOTICE OF INTENT TO AMEND THIS WEBPAGE AND/OR CLAIM TO ADD ADDITIONAL DEFENDANTS AND/OR RESPONDENTS AVIA PRAECIPE TO JOIN ADDITIONAL “CRIMINAL” DEFENDANTS AND/OR RESPONDENTS

IN ADDITION

.

COMES NOW SHARON[DAVIS-ABUSALEM]BRIDGEWATER VIA “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PEOPLE OF THE 50 STATES(MY SON TWO VICTIMS AND FEDERAL WITNESSES INJURED AND DAMAGED IN BUSINESS, PERSON OR PROPERTY WITH FIRST HAND FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT(CONTINUAL VIOLENCE AND OPPRESSION, RENDERED DISABLED BY THEIR HEINOUS ACTS OR OMISSION FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING, RESTRAINED FROM INTERSTATE AND FOREIGN COMMERCE BY CORRUPT U.S. GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, INCLUDING BIDEN, HARRIS, ALL U.S. REPRESENTATIVE, ALL GOVERNORS, ETC.[A.K.A. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES] ACTING IN THEIR INDIVIDUAL WITH AN “INTERNATIONAL ADOLPH HITLER SATANIC BIOTERRORIST BIOLOGICAL WARFARE TERRORIST GROUP ENTERPRISE – RING -JACOB ROTHCHILD “LITERALLY” SATANIST, LUCIFERIAN, AND OWNER AND CONTROLLER OF MOST IF NOT ALL “GLOBAL” CENTRAL BANKS, ALL CURRENCIES, THE U.S. FEDERAL RESERVE ETC. TO DEFRAUD MY SON AND I, “TWO WITNESSES” OUT OF MONEY AND/OR PROPERTY WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW) ON BEHALF OF MY, SON, THE PEOPLE OF THE 50 STATES AND/OR HUMANITY VIA “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE 50 STATES AND/OR THE PEOPLE OF THE 50 STATES PURSUANT THE CORRUPT ORGANIZATION ACT(RICO)SEE BELOW FOR DEFINITION, TO U.S. GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS THE CORRAUTHORIZED REPRESENTIVE OF “THE 50 STATES AND/OR THE PEOPLE OF THE 50 PURSUANT TO TH CONTINUAL VIOLENCE AND OPPRESSION, RENDERED DISABLED BY THEIR HEINOUS ACTS OR OMISSION FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING TO JAN. 1, 2009 AND FURTHER CONTINUING THRU INTENTIONAL” CONTINUAL VIOLENCE AND OPPRESSION BY PRESENT)“INJURED AND DAMAGED IN BUSINESS, PERSON OR PROPERTY, RESTRAINED FROM INTERSTATE AND FOREIGN COMMERCE BY JACOB ROTHCHILD(SATAN’S REPRESENTATIVE “LITERALLY” RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CORONAVIRUS, HIV, ZIKA VIRUS, MONEY POX, TOMATO POX “LITERALLY” – SEE BELOW – PROOF” ) AND CO-CONSPIRATORS ONE OR MORE TRUMP, GARLAND, BIDEN, HARRIS, OBAMA “U.S. GOVERNMENT STATE ACTORS” CONTINUAL VIOLENCE AND OPPRESSION, RENDERED DISABLED BY THEIR HEINOUS ACTS OR OMISSION FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING TO JAN. 1, 2009 AND FURTHER CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT AND THRUINTENTIONAL” CONTINUAL VIOLENCE AND OPPRESSION AND THE RUNNING OF ANY STATUE OF LIMITATION TO ADMIRALTY AND/OR MARITIME CLAIMS AND/OR CRIMINAL PROSECUTION(ETC.)IS NOT TIME BARRED ANDWITH FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE LIMITATIONS IS TOLLED –

WITNESS WITH FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE AND STANDING, “THE ONLY TWO PEOPLE IN THE WORLD PERSON IN THE WORLD DENIED COURT ACCESS SINCE AUGUST 2008 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT, AUTHORIZE(SEE AFFIDAVIT – APPEARANCE AS COUNSEL FOR THE 50 STATES)AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE 50 STATES, AND/OR “INTERNATIONAL PROSECUTOR – AS IN INTERNATIONAL PROSECUTOR” AS IN INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT

RETAILATED AGAINST IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S. Code § 1513 (ON BEHALF OF MYSELF, MY SON, ALL U.S. CITIZENS – “PEOPLE OF THE 50 STATES”) THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY AND/OR RELATOR STANDING!! COMES NOW “THE UNITED STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR PURSUANT  28 U.S.C. § 1651, AND ISSUE WRITS NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE IN AID OF THIS ADMIRALTY AND/OR MARITIME TIME “COMMON LAW” ARREST WARRANTS, FORFEITURE, ETC.

(JACOB ROTHCHILD, “THE ROCKEFELLER’S AND THEIR ASSOCIATES ALL LIABLE FOR DAMAGES AND FORFEIT PROPERTY TO “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR” – SEE THE REST OF THIS WEBPAGE)

SEE BELOW DECLARATORY JUDGMENT, BI-LATERAL CLASS REPRESENTATIVES, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION, ARREST WARRANTS IN REM AND OTHER ADMIRALITY AND/OR MARITIME DOCUMENTS

PLAINTIFF/CLAIMANT INCORPORATES THE FOLLOWING EXH. A AS FULLY SET FORTH HEREIN

THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR NOTICE OF DEMAND(CLASS REPRESENTATIVES BIDEN, HARRIS AND/OR GARLAND(ON BEHALF OF ALL U.S. LEGlSLATORS, CONGRESSMAN AND/OR WOMEN, FOREIGN OFFICIALS AND MAJOR CORPORATION FROM JAN 1, 1993 THRU TO PRESENT)REFUSE TO PAY!!

        ADDITIONAL CRIMINAL INFORMATION

GOVERNMENT PARTICIPATES AS                    RICO(1961)(4)

  “Office of the United States President”, “ Office of the United States Attorney”   

               “Office of the U.S. Supreme Court Justices” “Office of U.S. Legislators and/or Congressman”

A line of cases hold that any governmental agency, court, political office or the like could serve as a RICO “enterprise.” United States v. Thompson, 685 F.2d 993, 999 (6th Cir. 1982)(en banc) cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1072 (1983). Among the government units that have been held to be “enterprises” are offices of governors and state legislators, courts, court clerks’ offices. See e.g., United States v. Stratton, 649 F.2d 1066, 1072-75 (5th Cir. 1981); United States v. Clark, 656 F.2d 1259, 1261-67 (8th Cir. 1981) Office of county judge); United States v. Frumento, 405 F. Supp. 23, 29-30 (E.D. Pa. 1975), affd, 563 F.2d 1083 (3d Cir. 1977). cert, debued, 434 U.S. 1072 (1978).

In referring to the RICO liability of government offices the court thought it inconceivable that “in considering the ever more widespread tentacles of organized crime in the nation’s economic life, Congress intended to ignore an important aspect of the economy [simply] because it was state operated and state controlled ….” (563 F.2d at 1091.) Accepting defendants’ contentions would mean that “business organizatons legitimately owned and operated by the states, even though their activities substantially affect interstate commerce, would be open game for racketeers. [The court refused] to believe that Congress had such ‘tunnel-vision’ when it enacted the racketeering statute or that it intended to exclude from the protective embrace of this broad statute, designed to curb organized crime, state operated commercial ventures engaged in interstate commerce, or other governmental agencies regulating commercial and utility operations affecting interstate commerce.”Decisions after Frumento expanded government activity to every conceivable government agency, court, or political office. United States v. Thompson, 669 F.2d 1143 (6th Cir), revd 685 F.2d 993 (6th Cir. 1982)(en banc), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1072 (1983) The Enterprize “OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY .” AND “US PRESIDENT” AND CONSTITUTE A LEGAL ENTERPRIZE  “OFFICE OF SUPREME COURT JUSTICE OR JUDICIAL OFFICE” LEGAL ENTEPRIZE AND ASSOCIATION“OFFICE OF ELECTIONS”

Series of Documented Acts Comprising the RICO Offenses

A criminal racketeering enterprise requires a minimum of two contiguous acts to meet the legal definition of a racketeering enterprise. Dozens of such contiguous acts are documented including but not limited to:

• Repeated cover-ups, from 1993 and continuing thru the filing of this complaint, by federal judges and State Judges of ongoing documented corruption in the government’s Office of the President(White House), Office of the Attorney .(Department of Justice),[law enforcement agencies in California, Georgia, Michigan] Office of HUD(The Department of HUD), “other US Governnent Agencies,” that enabled to occur a series of major fraud on the United States which is the direct and proximate cause of the financial economic collapse −including but not limited to US Government joint participaton with Contractors fraud, Corporations , Partnerships, lawyers fraud , (under the Biden(Harris) adminitrationand Obama Bush[Iraq War],Clinton Adminstration)
• War Crimes, Crimes against Humanity, Repeated Terrorist Attacks, Repeated cover-ups of the criminal activities in overt and covert government operations that the Plaintiffs(the original source)discovered while a public housing facility.   
• The evidence of repeated conduct constituting “continual”obstruction of justice that they knew would continue to result in great harm to the two witnesses, U.S. Citizens and/or American people , the US Government, the US Treasury and to national security.
• The evidence of repeated felony retaliation against Whistleblowers such as the Plaintiff Sharon Bridgewater, and other Whistleblowers in the “Fast and furious,” “Benhi Scandle” etc. for attempting to report high-level crimes against the United States and to criminally halt ability to report such crimes.
• The corrupt, illegal and unconstitutional seizure of the Plaintiff business and personal property to restrain commerce knowingly it would cause great harm and impair the Plaintiff ability to conduct commerce.
• The corrupt, illegal, extortion and money laundering of US public housing tenants
• The IRS corrupt, illegal and unconstitutional targeting of tea party members.
•  The illegal, unconstitutional “amendment” to our US Constitution right that violate US Citizens right to bear arms and/or our right to freedom of religion.
• The corrupt, illegal and unconstitutional seizure of the AP Phone Records, violation of the “press”  first amendment US Constitutional right. 
• The  unconstitutional mandate of Obamacare.
• Converting the courts, and their judicial positions, into a racketeering enterprise.
• Perpetrating a series of predicate acts, that far exceeded the legal criteria for being a criminal racketeering enterprise.
• Each of these criminal acts were compounded by the fact that they were perpetrated by people in positions of trust, who were paid to enforce the law.
• Expanding on the number of parties involved in the series of predicate acts were the unknown−but suspected−Eric Holder and the U.S. Department of Justice−(and his predesors)parties that were orchestrating the multiple schemes and conspiracies and protecting each of the criminal acts of each and every one.
• Several US Senators and Congressman, confirming Todd Jones ATF director when they knew and were aware of a criminal pending investigation, and schemes to defraud the USA.

                                RICO Details

A criminal RICO racketeering organiztion crime requires:

• Two or more related predicate acts, in a conspiracy. Predicate offenses are related if they have (a) the same or similar purposes, (b) results, (c) participants, (c) victims, or (d) methods of commission.
  
  1. Same purposes. The participants’ purpose was to defraud the two witnesses out of money and/or property without due process of law, use trick, scheme, deception, money and/or property and/or the intangle right to honest services, “inflict” extreme emotional distress on the Plaintiffs and/or Petitioners and/or other Whistleblowers(such as in Swartz case)to block Sharon Bridgewater and/or James and other “COV-19 vaccine -injection”and other Whistleblowers, the press from reporting a continuing series of corrupt, with corporations, and criminal acts of public officials  joint participation with Corporations, individuals, to defraud the USA  involving key people in government.
      
  2. Results. The results included hindering and halting Sharon Bridgewaters and/or other Whistleblowers and/or the press from reporting the crime and/or  ability to properly report, publicize, and halt the ongoing corruption and conspiracy to defraud the USA.
      
  3. Participants. The participants included the repeated acts by the same people and groups, public officials including US Presidents, federal judges, Justice Department employees, lawyers, California, Michigan and judges and others acting in joint participation with each other.
      
  4. Victims. The victims included:
     
     • Repeated harm to The United States of America agenSharon Bridgewater et al, other Whistleblowers,  and US Citizens(the USA) and/or the press.  The harm consisted of seizing the Plaitniffs personal and business assets, depriving the Plaintifff Sharon Bridgewater and/or . the right to conduct commerce; depriving the Plaintiff and/or US Citizens and/or Whistleblower through a series of unlawful and unconstitutional judicial the rights and protections guaranteed to all citizens by the laws and constitution of the United States and/or the ability of IRS official to collect taxes, and/or the ability of the Plaintiffs, Whistleblowers and/or the Press to exercise their 1^st US Constitutonal amendment right to free speech.  
     • People of the United States who were harmed by the series of criminal acts and the documents actions of federal judges, Justice Public Officials, Department ofthememployees et al, and others, that enabled the crimes and resulting harm to continue.
        
  5. Method of commission. As it relates to the current and/or former presidents, public officials, federal judges and Justice Department participants, they perpetrated a series of acts including (a) failing to report the crime to congressional members and/or the US Government Oversight Committee members(b)labeling the Plaintiffs as a vexatious ligation (c)gross prosecutial misconduct(d)acts of violence against Whistleblower for attempting to report the ongoing crimes against the United States etc.(e)failing to change IRS tax laws.

• The racketeering acts were related, the intent being to halt the reporting and publicizing of high-level criminal activities.
   
• Their actions consisted of a continuing pattern of criminal activities.
   
• All of the actions were continuing, from 1993 thru the filing of this complaint, and arguably continuing as judicial orders still exist in several federal courts attempting to bar the Plaintiff Sharon Bridgewater and/or Whistleblowers and/or the Press from filing any papers in any federal district or appellate court. These orders knowingly obstructed justice by blocking the Plaintiff Sharon Bridgewater et al from reporting major and deadly criminal activities against the United States; and blocked the Sharon Bridgewater, Whistleblowers et al from exercising federal defenses against the pattern of civil and constitutional, and criminal acts for which they are federal causes of actions for which federal defenses exist.
   
• The predicate acts and conspiracy gravely affected interstate commerce, and caused, or enabled to occur, a continuing series of major fraud against the USA and/or the Plaintiff which is thedirect and proximate cause of the financial ecomomic collapse and also affects interstate commerce through criminal activities in the US Government of public officials, abuse of US Government power, committing criminal acts of bribery, corruption, and for pand acting outside their scope of authority and in their individual capacities.

      RICO REQUIRES NO MORE THAN 

      SLIGHT EFFECT UPON INTERSTATE COMMERCE

              The Plaintiffs was damaged or injured in business or property.     RICO Requires no more than a slight effect upon interstate commerce. United States v. Doherty, 867 F.2d 47, 68 (1st Cir. 1989). United States v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1531 (7th Cir. 1985). cert. denied, 106 S.Ct. 1188 (1986).Predicate acts were related to the common purpose of the enterprise, defraud US taxpayers, Consumers, and/or Class Plainitff and being to halt Sharon Bridgewater and other Whistleblowers and/or the press from reporting and publicizing the ongoing criminal activities. See United States v. Bonanno Organized Crime Family, 683 F. Supp. 1411, 1437 (E.D.N.Y. 1988).    All aided,  abetted, counseled, commanded, induced or procured to defraud the US, taxpayers, and/or the Class Plaintiff and/or commit predicate acts as defined in 18 USC section 1961(5) and further Eric Holder and Obama obstructed justice.    Further, Congress limited the force of Rule 8(b) by loosening the statutory requirements for what constitutes joint criminal activities. United States v. Friedman, 854 F.2d 535, 561 (2d Cir. 1988); United States v. Castellano, 610 F.Supp. 1359, 1396 (S.D.N.Y. 1985). If a defendant is not named in a conspiracy or RICO count, he may be charged in a separate court, in the same indictment, if he is alleged to have participated in the same series of acts or transactions that constituted the conspiracy or RICO offense.   Further as far as the RICO enterprize,  some benefited from the enterprise, and some did not. The racketeering activity is not required to benefit the enterprise.  (The participants in the scheme are not required to have personally profited, though some did.  United States v. Killip, 819 F.2d 1542, 1`549 (10th Cir. 1987. )

Some defendants agreed to join conspiracy with knowledge that other members were to commit at least two acts of racketeering. United States v. Leisure, 844 F.2d 1347, 1367 (8th Cir. 1988). See ‘ 1962(d), defendant agreed to join conspiracy with knowledge that other members were to commit at least two acts of racketeering.

In  Shearin v. E.F. Hutton Group, Inc., 885 F.2d 1162 (3d Cir. 1989). The court held that Shearin, a pro se plaintiff, could recover for being fired, if she proved that it was an overt act in furtherance of an alleged ‘ 1962(d) conspiracy to bilk Hutton customers for trust services which were never performed. In Sedima the court noted that standing to sue under ” 1962(a)──(c) is based on proof that the predicate racketeering acts caused injury to plaintiff’s business or property. 473 U.S. at 495. The court also held that Sedina did not foreclose the possibility that harm arising from a conspiratorial overt act, distinct from the predicate acts listed in ‘ 1961(1), could confer standing under ‘ 1962(d). 885 F.2d at 1169-70.

Defendant was aware of the “essential nature” of the enterprise, which was a group of persons associated for the purpose of luring people into rigged card games. United States v. Joseph, 835 F.2d 1149, 1152 (6th Cir. 1987); in United States v. Gallo, 667 F. Supp. 1359, 1401, (S.D.N.Y. 1985), the defendant must have knowledge of the enterprise and at least some of its criminal activities; Defendant must have been aware of at least the . existence of the enterprise (United States v. Castellano, 610 F.Supp. 1359, 1401 (E.D.N.Y. 1985); in order to prove RICO conspiracy count government must show the existence of a “unified agreement to participate in the affairs of the enterprise through a pattern of racketeering ….”

The court held that § 1962(c) does not require concerted criminal activity, only that an individual commit at least two acts of racketeering while participating in the conduct of an enterprise. United States v. Castallano, 610 F.Supp. 1359, 1392-1396 (S.D.N.Y. 1985). Id at 1394.

RICO Violations Involving A
 Continuing Series of ATTACK ON THE PLAINTIFFS AND OTHER WHISTLEBLOWERS

Dozens of separate predicate acts were perpetrated to block Sharon Bridgewater and/or Whistleblowers and/or the press from reporting ongoing criminal activities in high-level overt and covert operations involving government employees. That constituted claims under ‘ 1962(a),(b), (c), and (d), in factual allegations.

     1. RICO violators within the Office of the President, Office of the Attorney ., Office of HUD, et al conspired with each other  to halt the former Sharon Bridgewater and/or other Whistleblowers, “ the press” to disclose their major fraud, and/or to inflict economic hardship on the Plaintiff, restrain commerce, cause the Plaintiff suffering, and prevent the Plaintff from carrying out her responsibilities to report the crimes, all while all were either operating, directly or managing federal funds, and or  Offices of the US Government. 

• All Aided and abetted the repeated massive RICO violations and violated the Plaintiff civil right repeatedly.
•  Federal judges as RICO violators, entered the conspiracy, and continued actively from 2008 and continuing thru the filing of this complaint.  Their predicate acts included:

• Repeatedly blocking the Sharon Bridgewater complaint to halt the ability of the Plainiff to report the crime
• Entering a vexatious ligatant order
• Vacacating settlement conferences.
• Issued a series of unlawful and unconstitutional orders, with criminal intent, to halt the Plaintiffs ability to report the crimes.
• Corruptly, through violation of federal laws and constitutional protections, defrauded the USA in amounts in excess of 50(fifty) trillion dollars and knew and were aware ththey did not have the authority to schme and defraud, the USA. 
• Lawyers as RICO participants, aided, abetted the these corporations, partnerships, President and corporations, et al engaged in a series of unlawful  lawsuits from 1993 and thru the filing of this complaint, that violated blocks of state and federal laws and constitutional protections, that required the corrupt cooperation of Federal judges and federal judges.
   

 

ROTHCHILD AND CO-CONSPIRATORS, BIDEN(AND PREDECESSORS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 THRU TO PRESENT)INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGES, COMMITTED WIRE FRAUD, MAIL FRAUD LAUNDER MONEY THRU ALL CENTRAL BANKS AND/OR THE FEDERAL RESERVE, THE WHITE HOUSE, THE U.S. CAPITOL BUILDING IN WASHINGTON D.C. U.S. DEFENSE DEPARTMENT, CDC ETC.(REAL PROPERTY) ALL WERE involved in a transaction or attempted transaction in violation of section 1956, 1957 or 1960 of this title, or any property traceable to such property.

ALL COMMITTED CRIMES OF COVID – 19 BIOLOGICAL WARFARE, (B) Any property, real or personal, within the jurisdiction of the United States, constituting, derived from, or traceable to, any proceeds obtained directly or indirectly from an offense against a foreign nation, or any property used to facilitate such an offense, if the offense— (i) involves trafficking in nuclear, chemical, biological, or radiological weapons technology or material, or the manufacture, importation, sale, or distribution of a controlled substance (as that term is defined for purposes of the Controlled Substances Act), or any other conduct described in section 1956 (c)(7)(B);

(ii) would be punishable within the jurisdiction of the foreign nation by death or imprisonment for a term exceeding 1 year; and

(iii) would be punishable under the laws of the United States by imprisonment for a term exceeding 1 year, if the act or activity constituting the offense had occurred within the jurisdiction of the United States.

ALL REAL property, real or personal, which constitutes or is derived from proceeds traceable to a violation of section 215, 471, 472, 473, 474, 476, 477, 478, 479, 480, 481, 485, 486, 487, 488, 501, 502, 510, 542, 545, 656, 657, 670, 842, 844, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1014, 1028, 1029, 1030, 1032, or 1344 of this title or any offense constituting “specified unlawful activity” (as defined in section 1956 (c)(7) of this title), or a conspiracy to commit such offense.

(D) Any property, real or personal, which represents or is traceable to the gross receipts obtained, directly or indirectly, from a violation of— (i) section 666 (a)(1) (relating to Federal program fraud);

(ii) section 1001 (relating to fraud and false statements);

(iii) section 1031 (relating to major fraud against the United States);

(iv) section 1032 (relating to concealment of assets from conservator or receiver of insured financial institution);

(v) section 1341 (relating to mail fraud); or

(vi) section 1343 (relating to wire fraud),

if such violation relates to the sale of assets acquired or held by the the  [1] Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as conservator or receiver for a financial institution, or any other conservator for a financial institution appointed by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency or the National Credit Union Administration, as conservator or liquidating agent for a financial institution.

(E) With respect to an offense listed in subsection (a)(1)(D) committed for the purpose of executing or attempting to execute any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent statements, pretenses, representations or promises, the gross receipts of such an offense shall include all property, real or personal, tangible or intangible, which thereby is obtained, directly or indirectly.

(F) Any property, real or personal, which represents or is traceable to the gross proceeds obtained, directly or indirectly, from a violation of— (i) section 511 (altering or removing motor vehicle identification numbers);

(ii) section 553 (importing or exporting stolen motor vehicles);

(iii) section 2119 (armed robbery of automobiles);

(iv) section 2312 (transporting stolen motor vehicles in interstate commerce); or

(v) section 2313 (possessing or selling a stolen motor vehicle that has moved in interstate commerce).

(G) All assets, foreign or domestic— (i) of any individual, entity, or organization engaged in planning or perpetrating any any  [1] Federal crime of terrorism (as defined in section 2332b (g)(5)) against the United States, citizens or residents of the United States, or their property, and all assets, foreign or domestic, affording any person a source of influence over any such entity or organization;

(ii) acquired or maintained by any person with the intent and for the purpose of supporting, planning, conducting, or concealing any Federal crime of terrorism (as defined in section 2332b (g)(5)  [2] against the United States, citizens or residents of the United States, or their property;

(iii) derived from, involved in, or used or intended to be used to commit any Federal crime of terrorism (as defined in section 2332b (g)(5)) against the United States, citizens or residents of the United States, or their property; or

(iv) of any individual, entity, or organization engaged in planning or perpetrating any act of international terrorism (as defined in section 2331) against any international organization (as defined in section 209 of the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 (22 U.S.C. 4309 (b)) or against any foreign Government. [3] Where the property sought for forfeiture is located beyond the territorial boundaries of the United States, an act in furtherance of such planning or perpetration must have occurred within the jurisdiction of the United States. (H) Any property, real or personal, involved in a violation or attempted violation, or which constitutes or is derived from proceeds traceable to a violation, of section 2339C of this title.

(2) For purposes of paragraph (1), the term “proceeds” is defined as follows: (A) In cases involving illegal goods, illegal services, unlawful activities, and telemarketing and health care fraud schemes, the term “proceeds” means property of any kind obtained directly or indirectly, as the result of the commission of the offense giving rise to forfeiture, and any property traceable thereto, and is not limited to the net gain or profit realized from the offense.

(B) In cases involving lawful goods or lawful services that are sold or provided in an illegal manner, the term “proceeds” means the amount of money acquired through the illegal transactions resulting in the forfeiture, less the direct costs incurred in providing the goods or services. The claimant shall have the burden of proof with respect to the issue of direct costs. The direct costs shall not include any part of the overhead expenses of the entity providing the goods or services, or any part of the income ta

ALL IS FORFEITED TO SHARON[DAVIS- ABUSALEM]BRIDGEWATER VIA “THE 50 STATES EX REL PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR

The evidence showed a nexus between the racketeering activities and the enterprise, the goal of which was to overthrow the US Constitution, deprive and/or denied the Plaintiffs rights as secured by international and/or nation treaties(the US Constituion), and defraud US Taxpayers, Consumer the intangle right to honest services and overthrow the US Govenrment prevent the Class Plaintiffs and/or Petitioners from reporting and exposure of a continuing pattern of corrupt and criminal activities that were inflicting, and would continue to inflict, great harm upon the United States.

has___ been generally damaged in the sum of $____.

 2) in deliberate ignorance; or

(3) in reckless disregard and submitted claims to the US Treasury for the years of 2010(3.4 Trillion), 2011(3.6 Trillion), 2012(3.5 Trillion), 2013(3.4 Trillion), 2014(3.5 Trillion),   2015(3.6 Trillion) 2016(3.9 Trillion), AND 2017(4.1 Trillion)(US budget for these years can be verfied at www:_____________)which constitute a false claims under the Federal False Claims act, in the amount of $84,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00(EIGHTY FOUR TRILLION DOLLARS)that such claims are false, and are liable under the False Claims Act therefor. By virtue of these acts Obama _____as representative on behalf of class ____________ in the amount of $_______________, the amount is due and now owing.  Wherefore the Plaintiff request judgment in the amount of $_________________and writs of attachments. 

FORMAL CRIMINAL CHARGES

CLAIM # I

joe biden in his officia capacity as presidentBARAK H. OBAMA[AKA BARRY SOERTOES]IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS PRESIDENT ON BEHALF OF ALL CLASS DEFENDANTS UNCOVERED US TREASURY  PAYMENTS AND/OR MEDICADE PAYMENT

PLAINTIFF RE-ALLEGE THE ABOVE.  On or about 2009 and continuing thru present , BARAK H. OBAMA[AKA BARRY SOERTOES]IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS PRESIDENT ON BEHALF OF ALL CLASS DEFENDANTS CONCEALED KNOWN FACTS RETAILATED AGAINST THE PLAINTIFF WHISTLEBLOWERS

Defendant Barak H.Obama[AKA Barry Soertoes] in his official capacity as [Predessors] IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS PRESIDENT ON BEHALF OF ALL CLASS DEFENDANTS and Loretta Lynch in her official capacity, Planned Parenthood, The Federal Reserve, “Class Defendants” and each of them knowingly and willfully conspired and agreed among themselves to engage in  activities of which affect, interstate or foreign commerce and to conduct or participate, directly or indirectly, in the conduct of such enterprise’s affairs through a pattern of racketeering activity or collection of unlawful debt advocate and overthrow our constitutional form of Government, breach contracts and international treaties, commit war crimes, commit human rights violations, defraud the United States and submit false claims, support legislation, conspired, aided and abetted Planned Partnerhood to perform abortions, concealed known facts that they were selling fetal tissue and organ of aborted babies on the black market national and/or international for profit and launder  money thru bank(owned and operated by the Federal Reserve), discriminate against the Plaintiff Whistleblowers had a fiduary relationship with Barak H. Obama and was discriminated against based on race, class and/or disability, retaliated against, kidnapped, committed human rights violations,  assaulted by Obama acts or omissions.  knowing that such claims to medicade and/or US Treasury would be submitted to the US Treasury for employed by or associated with any enterprise

Defendant “Class Members,”  and each of them did the acts and things herein alleged pursuant to, and in furtherance of, the conspiracy and above-alleged agreement. Defendant class member adopted the acts, committed securities fraud,  ___ , furthered the conspiracy by cooperation with [—or— lent aid and encouragement to—-or—ratified and adopted the acts of—-] defendants, ____ in that _______.

1.

2..

<>. As a proximate result of the wrongful acts herein alleged plaintiff___ has___ been generally damaged in the sum of $____.

 2) in deliberate ignorance; or

(3) in reckless disregard and submitted claims to the US Treasury for the years of 2010(3.4 Trillion), 2011(3.6 Trillion), 2012(3.5 Trillion), 2013(3.4 Trillion), 2014(3.5 Trillion),   2015(3.6 Trillion) 2016(3.9 Trillion), AND 2017(4.1 Trillion)(US budget for these years can be verfied at www:_____________)which constitute a false claims under the Federal False Claims act, in the amount of $84,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00(EIGHTY FOUR TRILLION DOLLARS)that such claims are false, and are liable under the False Claims Act therefor. By virtue of these acts Obama _____as representative on behalf of class ____________ in the amount of $_______________, the amount is due and now owing.  Wherefore the Plaintiff request judgment in the amount of $_________________and writs of attachments. 

                          

COMES NOW THE THE STATE of Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming[the District of Columbia, the Common wealth of Puerto Rico, The US Virgin Island, Guam, theNorthern Marianna Islands, the American Samoa] EX REL Sharon Bridgewater (A.K.A. Sharon Abusalem, Sharon Davis) Private Attorney General and RELATOR[ FROM 1993 and continuing thru present]-  Real parties in interest  the undersigned complaintant says makes the following  affirmation under the penalties of perjury, and being duly sworn state the following is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.and that On or about 1785 and continuing thru present and further contining thru present the upon information and belief, the following Federal and/or State crimes did take place in the County of the District of Columbia, Washington D.C., in the County of Gwinnett, State of Georgia, in the County of Dekalb, State of Georgia, in the County of Fulton, State of Georgia, in the County of Oakland, State of California, in the  County of San Francisco, State of California, in the  County of Washtenaw, State of Michigan and “unknown” cities or towns in the State of Georgia, State of California, State of California, and/or Michigan, and in the  County of Wayne, State of Michigan and in the State of California, and/or the “50 States” in “unknown” cities or Towns, and/or in the  District of Columbia and/or in the contininial of United States, complains, alleges and appearing before a Federal Judge of the United States, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4, to report these crimes FORMALLY CHARGE

COUNT III

                   CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT TREASON

                                         by levying war against the USA

by adhering to their enemies,

giving those enemies aid and comfort

within the USA and elsewhere

Beginning on or about Jan. 1, 1993 and continuing thru the filing of this complaint within the District of Columbia and else in the US and/or intentionally, did unlawfully, willfully and knowingly combined, conspire together and with each other, came to the meeting of the minds, entered into an unlawful agreement and/or came to a mutual understanding to  accomplish a common and unlawful plan, namely to engage in a “pattern of racketeering activity” to commit_list predicate acts(violate a, b,c) and knowingly and willfully became a member of such conspiracy and futher, at the time, joined such conspiracy, he or she or they did so with the specific intent either to personally engage in at least two incidents of racketeering, as alleged in the Information,______________________ or he or she or they specifically intended to otherwise participate in the affairs of the “enterprise” with the knowledge and intent that other members of the conspiracy would engage in at least two incidents of racketeering, ______________________as alleged in the Information, as part of a “pattern of racketeering act or became a member without full  knowledge of of all of the details of the unlawful scheme but has an understanding of the unlawful nature of a plan and knowingly and willfully joins in that plan on one occasion, and played a minor part. In the unlawful scheme.

                                                             Conspiracy to

COUNT THREE:  Conspiracy to violate 18 U.S.C. 2381

Conspircy to commit treason by levying war against the USA

by adhering to their enemies,

giving those enemies aid and comfort

within the USA and elsewhere

(multiple violations as a principal)

Beginning on or about Jan. 1, 1993 and/or on or about _______ continuing thru the filing of this complaint within the District of Columbia and else in the US and/or international, AKA Queen Elizabeth and/or Charles, did unlawfully, willfully and knowingly combined, conspire together and with each other, and to commit commit multiple federal felonies by levying war against the several States and by adhering to their enemies, giving those enemies aid and comfort within three States of the Union and elsewhere, all in connection with the deaths

                                                                    TREASON

18 U.S. Code § 2339B – Providing material support or resources to designated foreign terrorist organizations

COUNT SIX:  18 U.S.C.

                                         CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT TREASON

COUNT SIX:  18 U.S.C.

                                      Aiding and Abetting Engaging in a Monetary                                    

                    Transaction in Property Derived from Specified Unlawful Activity

COUNT SIX:  18 U.S.C.286

                                     Conspiracy to Defraud the United States Government

                                                            With Respect to Claims 

From in or about 1993 through the present in Fairfax County, Virginia, and elsewhere in Virginia, in the District of Columbia, and Washington, D.C., defendants Barak H. Obama, Eric Holder,Shawn Dovanan, Kathleen Sebious _________, entered into a conspiracy to obtain payment; allowance; aid in obtainingpayment of claims against the United States Department of Treasury,a department of the United States, its Departments, programs or agencies for H defendant,____________________,

a resident of ____________________, made and presented to theUnited States Treasury Department a claim against the United States for payment, which he [she]knew to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent, by [e.g., preparing a budget and causing to be prepared a budget andfiling and causing to be filed, what purported to be a budget to operate the USA, which waspresented to the United States Treasury Department, through the Internal Revenue Service,wherein he [she] claimed [e.g., a refund of taxes]2 in the amount of $_____(Trillion of Dollars) knowing that claim to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent in violation of  18 U.S.C.286.

COUNT SIX:  18 U.S.C.287

                                                                   False Claim

From in or about ___________, 20__ in Fairfax County, Virginia, and elsewhere in Virginia, in the District of Columbia, and/or  Washington, D.C., defendants Barak H. Obama, _________, a resident of  the USA, and/or District of Columbia made and presented to theUnited States Treasury Department a claim against the United States for payment, which he he knew to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent by preparing  and/or causing to be prepared and submitting a budget what purported to be for to operate the Department of Justice which was presented to the United States Treasury Department of Treasury through the (?)US Congress, taxpayers, ______________¹ to deprive undersign counsel of his right to access to an impartial jury trial pursuant to civil RICO and 18 U.S.C. § 1983, as well as to an impartial court under the Federal Tort Claims Act, so to obstruct and cover-up the violations of federal statutory fathers’ rights to compel the extortion____ wherein he was not qualified to hold office and claimed to the right to hold office as US president and/or claimed to be a qualified individual to authorize to spend  [e.g., a refund of taxes]2 in the amount of $__________, knowing that claim to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent.defendant,____________________,

a resident of ____________________, made and presented to theUnited States Treasury Department a claim against the United States for payment, which he [she]knew to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent in violation of  18 U.S.C.287.

COUNT SIX:  18 U.S.C.287

                                                                   False Claim

From in or about ___________, 20__ in Fairfax County, Virginia, and elsewhere in Virginia, in the District of Columbia, and/or  Washington, D.C., defendants Eric Holder, _________, a resident of  the USA, and/or District of Columbia made and presented to theUnited States Treasury Department a claim against the United States for payment, which he he knew to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent by preparing  and/or causing to be prepared and submitting a budget what purported to be for to operate the Department of Justice which was presented to the United States Treasury Department of Treasury through the (?)US Congress, taxpayers, ______________¹ to deprive undersign counsel of his right to access to an impartial jury trial pursuant to civil RICO and 18 U.S.C. § 1983, as well as to an impartial court under the Federal Tort Claims Act, so to obstruct and cover-up the violations of federal statutory fathers’ rights to compel the extortion____ wherein he was not qualified to hold office and claimed to the right to hold office as US president and/or claimed to be a qualified individual to authorize to spend  [e.g., a refund of taxes]2 in the amount of $__________, knowing that claim to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent.defendant,____________________,

a resident of ____________________, made and presented to theUnited States Treasury Department a claim against the United States for payment, which he [she]knew to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent in violation of  18 U.S.C.287.  

SIX:  18 U.S.C.287

                                                                   False Claim

From in or about ___________, 20__ in Fairfax County, Virginia, and elsewhere in Virginia, in the District of Columbia, and/or  Washington, D.C., defendants Shawn Donavan, _________, a resident of  the USA, and/or District of Columbia made and presented to theUnited States Treasury Department a claim against the United States for payment, which he he knew to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent by preparing  and/or causing to be prepared and submitting a budget what purported to be for to operate the Department of Justice which was presented to the United States Treasury Department of Treasury through the (?)US Congress, taxpayers, ______________¹ to deprive undersign counsel of his right to access to an impartial jury trial pursuant to civil RICO and 18 U.S.C. § 1983, as well as to an impartial court under the Federal Tort Claims Act, so to obstruct and cover-up the violations of federal statutory fathers’ rights to compel the extortion____ wherein he was not qualified to hold office and claimed to the right to hold office as US president and/or claimed to be a qualified individual to authorize to spend  [e.g., a refund of taxes]2 in the amount of $__________, knowing that claim to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent.defendant,____________________,

a resident of ____________________, made and presented to theUnited States Treasury Department a claim against the United States for payment, which he [she]knew to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent  in violation of  18 U.S.C.287  

COUNT SIX:  18 U.S.C.287

                                                                   False Claim

From in or about ___________, 20__ in Fairfax County, Virginia, and elsewhere in Virginia, in the District of Columbia, and/or  Washington, D.C., defendants Eric Kathleen Sebibus, _________, a resident of  the USA, and/or District of Columbia made and presented to theUnited States Treasury Department a claim against the United States for payment, which he he knew to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent by preparing  and/or causing to be prepared and submitting a budget what purported to be for to operate the Department of Justice which was presented to the United States Treasury Department of Treasury through the (?)US Congress, taxpayers, ______________¹ to deprive undersign counsel of his right to access to an impartial jury trial pursuant to civil RICO and 18 U.S.C. § 1983, as well as to an impartial court under the Federal Tort Claims Act, so to obstruct and cover-up the violations of federal statutory fathers’ rights to compel the extortion____ wherein he was not qualified to hold office and claimed to the right to hold office as US president and/or claimed to be a qualified individual to authorize to spend  [e.g., a refund of taxes]2 in the amount of $__________, knowing that claim to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent.defendant,____________________,

a resident of ____________________, made and presented to theUnited States Treasury Department a claim against the United States for payment, which he [she]knew to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent in violation of  18 U.S.C.287  

COUNT SIX:  18 U.S.C.287

                                                                   False Claim

From in or about ___________, 20__ in Fairfax County, Virginia, and elsewhere in Virginia, in the District of Columbia, and/or  Washington, D.C., defendants Hillary Clinton, _________, a resident of  the USA, and/or District of Columbia made and presented to theUnited States Treasury Department a claim against the United States for payment, which she knew to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent by preparing  and/or causing to be prepared and submitting a budget what purported to be for to operate the Department of State which was presented to the United States Treasury Department of Treasury through the (?)US Congress, taxpayers, ______________¹ to deprive undersign counsel of his right to access to an impartial jury trial pursuant to civil RICO and 18 U.S.C. § 1983, as well as to an impartial court under the Federal Tort Claims Act, so to obstruct and cover-up the violations of federal statutory fathers’ rights to compel the extortion____ wherein he was not qualified to hold office and claimed to the right to hold office as US president and/or claimed to be a qualified individual to authorize to spend  [e.g., a refund of taxes]2 in the amount of $__________, knowing that claim to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent.defendant,____________________, a resident of ____________________, made and presented to theUnited States Treasury Department a claim against the United States for payment, which he [she]knew to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent in violation of  18 U.S.C.287

COUNT SIX:  18 U.S.C.287

                                                                   False Claim

From in or about ___________, 20__ in Fairfax County, Virginia, and elsewhere in Virginia, in the District of Columbia, and/or  Washington, D.C., defendants Michelle Obama, _________, a resident of  the USA, and/or District of Columbia made and presented to theUnited States Treasury Department a claim against the United States for payment, which she knew to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent, by preparing and/or submitting and/or causing to be filed with “White house Travel” what purported to be listed two daughters _____ as “white house staff members” waspresented to the United States Treasury Department, through the Travel Office of the White house, wherein  she claimed and/or defrauded the United States Treasury in the amount of $__________, knowing thatclaim to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent in violation of  18 U.S.C.287

COUNT SIX:  18 U.S.C.371

From in or about ___________, 20__ in Fairfax County, Virginia, and elsewhere in Virginia, in the District of Columbia, and/or  Washington, D.C., defendants Michelle Obama, _________, a resident of  the USA, and/or District of Columbia made and presented to theUnited States Treasury Department a claim against the United States for payment, which she knew to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent, by preparing and/or submitting and/or causing to be filed with “White house Travel” what purported to be listed two daughters _____ as “white house staff members” waspresented to the United States Treasury Department, through the Travel Office of the White house, wherein  she claimed and/or defrauded the United States Treasury in the amount of $__________, knowing thatclaim to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent in violation of  18 U.S.C.287.

CLAIM IV

BREACH OF CONTRACT AGAINST  THE PUBLIC/PRIVATE “TRANSNATIONAL”

By reason of defendant Loretta Lynch breach of said contract and/or negligence as herein alleged, the plaintiff “the United States et al and/or the “Class Petitioner Representative Bridgewater and/or Class Member  has suffered damages in the sum of not less than and not less than 100,000,000,000,000,000(One Hunred Trillion Dollars-class Defendants).

By the terms of said written agreement, the Plaintiff is entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees incurred in the enforcement of the provisions of the agreement. By reason of the aforementioned breach of the defendant Loretta Lynch, the Plaintiff has been forced to “ACT AS PROSECUTOR, TO DEFEND FOR THE UNITED STATES, ET AL,” to collect fines, etc. ) and to  recover money and/or property on behalf of the “ United 50 States et al.”    Further on or about Nov. 15, 2015 and continuing thru present the Petitioner has sent Loretta Lynch “duly authorized, first class certified mail,” and a number of times since then, plaintiff  Bridgewater has demanded Loretta Lynch in her official capacity to  stop her wrongful conduct described above. Defendants Loretta Lynch as the United States Attorney General et al , and each of them, have refused and still refuse to refrain from their wrongful conduct.

             Defendants Loretta Lynch in her official capacity unless and until enjoined and restrained by order of this court, will cause great and irreparable injury to “the United States et al ,” in that “the United 50 States and/or the Plaintiff will suffer and continue to suffer from deprivation of property and/or money without due process of law in violaton of the United  Constitution and/or International laws and treaties.The enterprise “federal officials” joint participation has  changed, or altered the movement or ransportation or flow of goods, merchandise, money, or other property between or mong two or more states (between a state and a foreign country).Nature of Trade and Commerce; Real Estate .Holder acted or refused to act on ground generally applicable to the Class

By the aforesaid acts and omissions Defendants caused the damage and _____The United States performed all of its contractual obligations pertaining to the payment via the job of the United States President and/or the United States Attorney General “all officer shall uphold the United States Constitution, ___________faithfully ________, Loretta Lynch prosecute

As a result of the aforesaid acts and omissions, Defendants breached its contractual obligation by failing to perform work as the United States President and the United Statea Attorney General., as a consequence of which the United States is entitled to money damaged in the amount ________

<>. On or about ___, 19__, in the City of ___, County of ___, State of California, Plaintiff and defendant entered into a written agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and made a part hereof. By the terms of said written agreement, ___.

The consideration set forth in the agreement was the fair and reasonable.Plaintiff has performed all conditions, covenants, and promises required by him on his part to be performed in accordance with the terms and conditions of the contract.On or about ___, 19__ the defendant__ breached the said agreement by _____. By reason of defendant__ breach of said contract as herein alleged, the plaintiff__ has__ suffered damages in the sum of $__.By the terms of said written agreement, the Plaintiff is entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees incurred in the enforcement of the provisions of the agreement. By reason of the aforementioned breach of the defendant, the Plaintiff has been forced to “ACT AS PROSECUTOR AND ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE 50 STATES.” WHEREFORE, plaintiff__ pray__ judgment against defendant__ and each of them, as follows:

For compensatory damages in the sum of $___; For interest on the sum of $___ from and after ___, 19__ to date of judgment;For reasonable attorney fees according to proof; For costs of suit herein incurred; and For such other and further relief as the court may deem proper, writs of attachment, arrest warrants,

VIOLATION OF 2ND AMENDMENT RIGHT

BUSH, OBAMA AND HOLDER KNOWINGLY, INTENTIONALLY CAME ON TO MY PREMISES, ARRESTED MY WITHOUT PROBABLE CAUSE STOLE MY GUN AND BUSINESS COMPUTER AND PAPERS, CHARGE ME WITH THEFT BY TAKING AND CONSPIRED WITH JUDGES TO DISMISS EACH AND EVERY ONE OF THE COMPLAINTS I FILED

Current law prohibits individuals from buying a gun if, because of a mental health issue, they are either a danger to themselves or others or are unable to manage their own affairs. The Social Security Administration (SSA) has indicated that it will begin the rulemaking process to ensure that appropriate information in its records is reported to NICS. The reporting that SSA, in consultation with the Department of Justice, records of the approximately 75,000 people each year who have a documented mental health issue, receive disability benefits, federal prohibition on possessing a firearm for reasons related to mental health. There are many disabled people who are receive checks on behalf of disabled people.

1. Obama and/or Loretta Lynch conspired under the color of law, breached her duties and/or legal obligations as United States Attorney General, violated her oath of office and further violated the class Plaintiff Second Amendment rights to bear arms a committed a number of other overt acts requiring injunctive relief.

• As a direct and proximate consequence of the Defendants’ actions, Plaintiffs were deprived of certain rights, privileges and immunities secured by the Constitution of the United States of America(Human rights via the Universal Declaration International laws and treaties) the laws of this Nation and the “50 States.” and the Class Plaintiffs  2^nd  amendment’ Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment rights to procedural and/or  substantive due process and equal protection of the laws were violated by the Defendants, together with their Eighth Amendment right proscribing cruel and unusual punishment and their Fourth Amendment right to be free of unreasonable searches and seizures, as well as their First Amendment right to free speech and expression.  The Class Plaintiff and/or the Class members lost their ability to earn a living due to the above Defendants conspiracies, conspiracies to defraud the Plaintiffs out of money or property, violence against the Plaintiffs(WOMEN minority business owners), oppression, unfair business practices, unfair competition, conspiracies to restrain commerce, acts of threats, extortion, coercion, force, assault and battery, usurpation of business(is)The Specialty Investment Group LLC dissolved in Sept. 2010, due to the “repeated” conspiracies and/or unlawful attacks to restrain commerce, unfair competition, unfair business practices, repeated, continual  violation of the Specialty Investment Group LLC and/or the Plaintiff’s United States Constitutional violations civil rights by the above named Defendants. illegal overt acts by the United States Government  the Plaintiff has direct and/or indirectly proximate cause of the Plaintiff’s mental and emotional instability and social security, oppression, deprivation of business and personal property, theft, and anti-competitive conduct of one or more of  the Defendants of which conduct, which violates both federal antitrust laws.  The United States has been damaged and injured by the overt acts of the Defendants.

I have been unable to drive a car, work, make a living  due to the repeated conspiracies of the Defendants.  My son is currently on probation, via “threat,” coercion and/or force and is “forced” to pay $800.00 for crimes he did not commit(via concealment and/or acts or omissions of Barak H. Obama and/or Lynch). 

CLAIM II

  LIBEL

THE ELEMENTS OF LIBEL

1.  Name and legal description of court before which is brought.
2.  Name and legal description of Libellant and any offer or function or relationship the libellant may hold it the regret to sustain that action depends upon it, as if he be foreigner claim man any particular ground or him eecitopm guardian which act [tocotu he may he/she may be sued\end at home; or if the libellant be a married women or women with separate personal rights.
3. The name and legal description of the person soar the thing against when or which the suit is brought.
4. The nature of the cause as that it is civil or maritime contract, or tort or dame or of possession, or otherwise as the case may be and if the libel is in rem, the property is with the district, and if the persona the name and occupation and palaces of resident of the parties.
5. The facts upon which the suit is brought.
6. That the premises to be within the admiralty and maritime jurisdiction of the United States Courts
7. The prayer for the remedies which is situated to the case.
8. The prayer for relief or remedy which the libellant seeks by the suit, and which the court is competent to give.
9. The process prayed for may be a war of arrest the person of the Defendant in nature of a capital or warrant of arrest with a clause therein, if the Defendant can be found his/her goods and chattels to the amount sue for; or if such an not be found, to attach is credits and effects to the amount sued for in the hands of the garnishees named therein; or an single moment in in nature of a summons to appear and answer to the suit.

Plaintiff brings this case action on behalf of all African Americans, minorities from 1993 and continuing thru present who purchased a vehicle and displayed “drive out tag” as a license plate until they are able to obtain a license plate from the Department of Motor Vehicle and/or Secretary of State and who were pulled over a vehicle who were driving their cars and “pulled over,” and questioned by the police, received a traffic ticket.

Plaintiff brings this case action on behalf of all African Americans, minorities from 1993 and continuing thru present  who  lived in cities Major cities throughout the United States(Atlanta, Los Angeles, New York, Detroit, Chicago, i.e.)__________________________were assaulted, beaten, arrested, humiliated, falsely imprisonment, maliciously prosecuted without probable cause on the sole account based on race, class, gender, ethnicity, disability, national origin, and by Police Officers on the sole account of race, _____________

During all of the times referred to, Defendant Loretta Lynch (and Processors from 1993 and continuing thru to her term) is a Law Enforcement Officer, and were “Does 2001 thru 1, 000, 000, 000, 000,” police officers stationed at various Police States and members of the Police Department of “cities,” of “the United States.”

The “Class Representative,” and Plaintiff  Sharon Bridgewater son James S. Bridgewater , now 33 years of age, is, and at all times mentioned was a Citizen of the United States locations throughout the United States, and a resident of Michigan, and of the Eastern District of Michigan.

Plaintiff was arrested by Defendant _____________________on _________, at___time, and at the Redford Police Department.

The arrest was made without a warrant and the charge was for “Lying to a Police Officer.”

Concealed

The “Class Representative,” and Plaintiff Bridgewater, now 54 years of age, is, and at all times mentioned was a Citizen of the United States locations throughout the United States, and a resident of Michigan, and of the Eastern District of Michigan.

Plaintiff was arrested by Defendant _____________________on _________, at___time, and taken to the Washtenaw County Police Station concerning an alleged “driving ____________________.  All arrest were made without a warrant.  During one two or more arrest numerous articles of personal and business property were seized by the arresting officers without a warrant and not returned.  Despite the “repeated,” “continual,” plea of the Class Plaintiff to return her business or personal property.   Plaintiff remained and continues to remain in police custody via “one or more outstanding warrants, “and is unlawful held in violation of the United States Constititituion on the account she is a “Whistleblower, “ and/or federal witness and victim of Racketeering .

At _______time___on _____date, Plaintiff was again on the same charge set forth in paragraph 4 by the Defendant____and other police officers, wrongfully imprisioned, with out a warrant and contrary to the United States Constitution and/or the “50State Statues.”  Plaintiff and Class members were taken to the scene of the alleged crime and there questioned by some of the Defendant and {set out acts] of the Defendant by reason of which playoffs was coerced.  Plaintiff and Class members was promised medical aid if he/she would sign a confession and was promised that the beatings would cease.  Plaintiff then initialed some paper and the beatings ceased.  Uniteder compulsion of the beatings and threats previously described and desiring immediate medical aid, the Plaintiff was compelled to testify against him/herself by signing a stating admitting the burglary or some other crime. 

        Defendants beat plaintiff for the purpose of forcing he/her to make a confession and for the purpose of imposing illegal summary punishment on him/her.  Defendant was held incommunicado for a period of over various hours 1-72 hours and the Defendants refused to permit Plaintiff attorney to see or consult with him or her client, the Plaintiff.  As a result of the beatings by the Defendant [describe injuries], all in violation of the laws of the United States, as more particularly set for later.  The action of Defendants were under color of law.

            Title 42 USC section 1985(2) provides in part as follows:” If two or more persons conspire for the purpose of impeding, hindering, obstructing, or defeating in any manner, the due course of justice in any State or Territory, with intent to deny to any citizen the equal protection of the law, or to injure him or his property for lawfully enforcing or attempting to enforce, the right of any person or class of persons, to the equal protection of the laws,”

          Subparagraph(3) of the same Section provides as follows: in any case of conspiracy set forth in this section, if one or more persons engaged in conspiracy do, or cause to be done any act in furtherance of the object of the conspiracy, by which another is injured in his person or property, or deprived of having and excising any right or privilege of a citizen of the United States, the party so injured or deprived may have deprivation, against any one or more of the conspirators.”

                     From Jan. . . .1, 1993 and continuing thru present in the City of _____________Northen District of Georgia, the Defendants entered into a conspiracy with each other, and with other parties whose names are unknown to the Plaintiff, for the purpose of impeding, hindering, obstructing or defeating the due course of justice in the State of Michigan and/or other States with intent to deny the Plaintiff equal protection of the laws and with intent to injure his/her lawfully enforcing or attemptiming to enforce her right to equal protection o f the laws in that the Defendant, pursuant ot the conspiracy caused the Plaintiff to be unlawfully arrested; caused the institution, and continuation thru to present of malicious prosecution agains the Plaintiff; gave and caused to be given perjured testismony resulting in the return of an indictment in the 14A Judicial District Court for the State of Michigan and subsequently warrants and/or wrongful conviction of Plaintiff causing Plaintiff to be falsely imprisioned since Sept. 2007.  Which incarceration resulted in loss wages to h___as ______over $__________; persisted in uttering perjured and false testimony in the hearing on numerous habeas corpus and post-conviction petitions filed by plaintiff and heard during _____,_______and______; over_______petitions were filed during the period;  the persistence continuing even after the ___Supreme Court affirmed the granting of a new trial to Plaintiff in the return of their mandate to the ___court of _on __date; caused duress and fear of retribution to be exercised on the Plaintiff up to and including____date.  Pursuant to the conspiracy, Defendants seriously injured Plaintiff and caused her, by force and violence, to testify against herself by means of a wrongfully obtained confession, with respect to charges against him of which Plaintiff was innocent and which charges constituted a crime under the laws of the state of ______.  As a result of the wrongful conduct of the Defendants, carried out under color of law, the Plaintiff was deprived of his/her constitutional  rights secured to him/her by the Fourteenth Amndmentot the Untied States Cosntitution.  The conspiracy continues to this present date. 

           In furtherance of the objectives of the conspiracy referred to in the proceding paragraph, the Defendant either did, or cause to be done, the following overt acts: set out the illegal acts

1. Unconstitutional Traffic Stops
2. D
3. D
4. E
5. C
6. C
7.  

The acts which Defendants did or caused to be done in furtherance of the conspiracy referred to and described in the preceding paragraphs, injured the body of the Plaintiff permanently and has caused him/her extreme paind and suffering which still continues. 

1. On or about August 2008 and continuing thru present the Plaintiff claimed an interest in the “Office of the United States Attorney General.”

• On or about Nov. 1, 2007, Public Officers illegally unlawfully deprived and caused injury

• On or about Nov. and continuing thru repeatedly requested the return of her office and business(computer, gun________________)and deprived and/or deprived the Plaintiff equal protection under the law and/or equal privilege and violated the

• by filing multiple complaints against Barak H. Obama and/or Eric Holder alleging libel, peonage, slavery, human rights violation and/or RICO violations

• Caused one or more indictment, grand jury in violation of ________.

• On or about Nov. 2007 and continuing thru present Eric Holder(and those operating under his direction) published and/or posted defamatory information on the DOJ website and/or in the NCIC crime data base that the Class Claimant had been convicted and/or arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol; theft by taking; and further posted mug shots, warrants for arrest  and  an defamatory posting of an “ARMED AND DANGEROUS,” in the  Department of Justice data base[nation wide], [1]  without probable cause.

• The entire statement and/or posting is false as it pertains to the Class Plaintiff Bridgewater.

• The described publication and/or posting on the Department of Justice website and data bases are libelous on its face.  It clearly expose Plaintiff to hatred, contempt, ridicule and oblguy, because a “ARMED AND DANGEROUS” posting is clearly a posting for  “mass murders or extremely dangerous persons such as terrorist or rapist; and charges the Class Plaintiff  with having committed a serious crime of murder, rape, etc. [2]

10.. As a proximate result of the above the Plaintiff has suffered lost of reputation, low self esteem, shame, mortification, injury to all to her damage in excess of $100,000,000,000,000.00.

The above describe publication is not privileged because it was published or posted by Defendant Eric Holder in the Department of Justice and upon information and belief with the state of mind of malice, hatred and/or ill will toward the Plaintiff and without probable cause and upon information and belief in retaliation “only because the Plaintiff was the victim of Racketeering (Federal Witness),” and the will to punish the Plaintiff for asserting her legal rights. On or about April 24, 2015, Loretta Lynch (and Barak H.Obama-2009 and continuing thru present) entered into an agreement (express or implied) with the United States Government to faithfully execute duties, and to uphold the United States Constitution._______see

     In accord with the provision of the agreement,the Plaintiff (the United States Government) paid Loretta Lynch (and Obama et al) a weekly salary of ________________upon the performance of _____________duties, and to uphold the United States Constitution.  Loretta Lynch knew or should have known that such _________is discriminatory, violates the Class Plaintiff civil rights, .  Loretta Lynch breached her upon information and belief knowingly, intentionally violated the Plaintiff Civil rights.

Defendant Loretta Lynch and Barry Soetoes and each of the did the acts and things herein alleged pursuant to, and in furtherance of the conspiracy, in that on or about SOn or about Nov. 2007 and continuing thru present Eric Holder(and those operating under his direction) published and/or posted defamatory information on the DOJ website and/or in the NCIC crime data base that the Class Claimant had been convicted and/or arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol; theft by taking; and further posted mug shots, warrants for arrest  and  an defamatory posting of an “ARMED AND DANGEROUS,” in the  Department of Justice data base[nation wide], without probable cause.

1. The entire statement and/or posting is false as it pertains to the Class Plaintiff Bridgewater.

• The described publication and/or posting on the Department of Justice website and data bases are libelous on its face.  It clearly expose Plaintiff to hatred, contempt, ridicule and oblguy, because a “ARMED AND DANGEROUS” posting is clearly a posting for  “mass murders or extremely dangerous people such as terrorist or rapist(BOTH WITNESSES SHARON AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER HAS NO JUVENILLE, MISDEMEANOR OR FELONY RECORD); and charges the Class Plaintiff  with having committed a serious crime of murder, rape, etc.

10.. As a proximate result of the above the Plaintiff  James S. Bridgewater has suffered lost of reputation, low self esteem, shame, mortification, injury to all to her damage in excess of $10,000.00000000000.

• The above describe publication is not privileged because it was published or posted by Defendant Loretta Lynch in the Department of Justice and upon information and belief with the state of mind of malice, hatred and/or ill will toward the Plaintiff James S. Bridgewaerand without probable cause and upon information and belief in retaliation “only because the Plaintiff was the victim of Racketeering (Federal Witness),” and the will to punish the Plaintiff for asserting her legal rights.   

---

[1] AND CONTINUES TO POST THIS DEFAMATORY INFORMATION.

1. [2] There have been multiple, numerous other unlawful acts(complete torture and torment too many to mention during the course of 7-8 years).

[3] AND CONTINUES TO POST THIS DEFAMATORY INFORMATION.

• [4] There have been multiple, numerous other unlawful acts(complete torture and torment too many to mention during the course of 7-8 years).

CLAIM III

NEGILENCE

In any negligence case, the plaintiff bears the burden of proving the existence of a duty owed by the defendant, a breach of that duty, causation, and damage

On or about Jan. 4, 2016 Defendant Lynch and/or obamaperfomed acts that a person of ordinary prudence in the same or similar cicumstances would not have done or she failed to perform acts that a person or ordinary prudence would have done under he same or cimilar circumstance becase she is the United States Attorney General and knew and/or should have known the “Untied States Constitution.” Even further Obama was an instructor at Hardvard “Specializing in constitutional law, he too knew or should have known the the Class Plaintiff were violated.  The Class Plaintiff have been injured and damge by the the 2^nd amended US Cosntiton rights violations and have damages this amount is due and now owing.

CLAIM IV

BREACH OF CONTRACT AGAINST  LORETTA LYNCH IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITY

By reason of defendant Loretta Lynch breach of said contract and/or negligence as herein alleged, the plaintiff “the United States et al and/or the “Class Petitioner Representative Bridgewater and/or Class Member  has suffered damages in the sum of not less than and not less than 100,000,000,000,000,000(One Hunred Trillion Dollars-class Defendants).

By the terms of said written agreement, the Plaintiff is entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees incurred in the enforcement of the provisions of the agreement. By reason of the aforementioned breach of the defendant Loretta Lynch, the Plaintiff has been forced to “ACT AS PROSECUTOR, TO DEFEND FOR THE UNITED STATES, ET AL,” to collect fines, etc. ) and to  recover money and/or property on behalf of the “ United 50 States et al.”    Further on or about Nov. 15, 2015 and continuing thru present the Petitioner has sent Loretta Lynch “duly authorized, first class certified mail,” and a number of times since then, plaintiff  Bridgewater has demanded Loretta Lynch in her official capacity to  stop her wrongful conduct described above. Defendants Loretta Lynch as the United States Attorney General et al , and each of them, have refused and still refuse to refrain from their wrongful conduct.

             Defendants Loretta Lynch in her official capacity unless and until enjoined and restrained by order of this court, will cause great and irreparable injury to “the United States et al ,” in that “the United 50 States and/or the Plaintiff will suffer and continue to suffer from deprivation of property and/or money without due process of law in violaton of the United  Constitution and/or International laws and treaties.The enterprise “federal officials” joint participation has  changed, or altered the movement or ransportation or flow of goods, merchandise, money, or other property between or mong two or more states (between a state and a foreign country).Nature of Trade and Commerce; Real Estate .Holder acted or refused to act on ground generally applicable to the Class

By the aforesaid acts and omissions Defendants caused the damage and _____The United States performed all of its contractual obligations pertaining to the payment via the job of the United States President and/or the United States Attorney General “all officer shall uphold the United States Constitution, ___________faithfully ________, Loretta Lynch prosecute

As a result of the aforesaid acts and omissions, Defendants breached its contractual obligation by failing to perform work as the United States President and the United Statea Attorney General., as a consequence of which the United States is entitled to money damaged in the amount ________

<>. On or about ___, 19__, in the City of ___, County of ___, State of California, Plaintiff and defendant entered into a written agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and made a part hereof. By the terms of said written agreement, ___.

The consideration set forth in the agreement was the fair and reasonable.Plaintiff has performed all conditions, covenants, and promises required by him on his part to be performed in accordance with the terms and conditions of the contract.On or about ___, 19__ the defendant__ breached the said agreement by _____. By reason of defendant__ breach of said contract as herein alleged, the plaintiff__ has__ suffered damages in the sum of $__.By the terms of said written agreement, the Plaintiff is entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees incurred in the enforcement of the provisions of the agreement. By reason of the aforementioned breach of the defendant, the Plaintiff has been forced to “ACT AS PROSECUTOR AND ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE 50 STATES.” WHEREFORE, plaintiff__ pray__ judgment against defendant__ and each of them, as follows:

For compensatory damages in the sum of $___; For interest on the sum of $___ from and after ___, 19__ to date of judgment;For reasonable attorney fees according to proof; For costs of suit herein incurred; and For such other and further relief as the court may deem proper, writs of attachment, arrest warrants,

CLAIM I

                                     [ RICO ]

                              BREACH OF CONTRACT

Plaintiff allege that the Defendant Donald Trump in his official capacity breached his contract, the Plaintiff has demanded property and Defendant has failed and refuse and continues to fail and to refuse, to remit the money and/or property although duly demanded requiring immediate injunctive relief and the Plaintiff has been damaged and continues to be damage and have damages  as follows:

_____________________                                                     $_______________

This amount is due and now owing, and the Plaintiff is entitled to writ of attachment,  judgment in the amount of __________________.  

Amount paid  $0                                 Amount due: $______________________.

                                                     CLAIM I

                                     [ RICO ]

                              BREACH OF FIDICARY DUTIES

Plaintiff allege that the Defendant Donald Trump in his official capacity breached his contract, the Plaintiff has demanded property and Defendant has failed and refuse and continues to fail and to refuse, to remit the money and/or property although duly demanded requiring immediate injunctive relief and the Plaintiff has been damaged and continues to be damage and have damages  as follows:

_____________________                                                     $_______________

This amount is due and now owing, and the Plaintiff is entitled to writ of attachment,  judgment in the amount of __________________.  

Amount paid  $0                                 Amount due: $______________________.  

                                                        CLAIM II

                                      [ RICO ]

CONDUCT AND PARTICIPATION IN A RICO ENTERPRIZE THRU A PATTERN OF

                                                RACKEETEERING ACTIVITY

Plaintiff allege that the Defendant Donald Trump in his official capacity conducted in a Rico Enterprize thru a pattern of Rackeeteering Activity  and the plaintiff has been injured and damaged and  Plaintiff has demanded property and Defendant has failed and refuse and continues to fail and to refuse, to remit the money and/or property although duly demanded requiring immediate injunctive relief and the Plaintiff has been damaged and continues to be damage and have damages  as follows:

_____________________                                                     $_______________

The Plantiff have punitive damages in the amount of $ ________________________.  This amount is due and now owing.

This amount is due and now owing, and the Plaintiff is entitled to writ of attachment,  judgment in the amount of __________________.

Amount paid  $0                                 Amount due: $______________________.  

.

                                                      CLAIM III

                                                   [ RICO ]

     CONSPIRACY TO ENGAGE IN A PATTERN OF RACKEETEERING ACTIVITY:

Plaintiff allege that the Defendant Donald Trump in his official capacity conspired to engage in a pattern of Rackeeterring Activity and the plaintiff has been injured and damaged and  Plaintiff has demanded property and Defendant has failed and refuse and continues to fail and to refuse, to remit the money and/or property although duly demanded requiring immediate injunctive relief and the Plaintiff has been damaged and continues to be damage and have damages  as follows:

_____________________                                                     $_______________

This amount is due and now owing, and the Plaintiff is entitled to writ of attachment,  judgment in the amount of __________________.

Amount paid  $0                                 Amount due: $______________________.  

                                                    CLAIM IV

                                                    [ RICO ]

                              MALICIOUS PROSECUTION

Plaintiff allege that the Defendant Donald Trump in his official capacity instituted and/or continued a criminal proceeding agains the claimant and the termination of the proceeding ended in the Claimant favor and the plaintiff has been injured and damaged anPlaintiff has demanded property and Defendant has failed and refuse and continues to fail and to refuse, to remit the money and/or property although duly demanded requiring immediate injunctive relief and the Plaintiff has been damaged and continues to be damage and have damages  as follows:

_____________________                                                     $_______________

This amount is due and now owing, and the Plaintiff is entitled to writ of attachment,  judgment in the amount of __________________.

Amount paid  $0                                 Amount due: $______________________.  

                                                    CLAIM V

                                                    [ RICO ]

   VIOLATION OF THE CLAIMANT 5^TH AND/OR 9^TH AND/OR 10^TH AMENDMENT US CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT[42 USC SECTION 1983/1985(3)]

Plaintiff allege that the Defendant Donald Trump in his official capacity acted under the color of law denied and/or deprived the Claimant her 5^th and/or 9^th and/or 10^th Amendment US Constitutional rights and the plaintiff has been injured and damaged anPlaintiff has demanded property and Defendant has failed and refuse and continues to fail and to refuse, to remit the money and/or property although duly demanded requiring immediate injunctive relief and the Plaintiff has been damaged and continues to be damage and have damages  as follows:

_____________________                                                     $_______________

This amount is due and now owing, and the Plaintiff is entitled to writ of attachment,  judgment in the amount of __________________.

Amount paid  $0                                 Amount due: $______________________.  

                                                        CLAIM VI

                                                       [ RICO ]

                                                       LIBEL

Plaintiff allege that the Defendant Donald Trump in his official capacity acted under the color of law conspired with other and “libeled” the Claimant and the plaintiff has been injured and damaged anPlaintiff has demanded property and Defendant has failed and refuse and continues to fail and to refuse, to remit the money and/or property although duly demanded requiring immediate injunctive relief and the Plaintiff has been damaged and continues to be damage and have damages  as follows:

_____________________                                                     $_______________

This amount is due and now owing, and the Plaintiff is entitled to writ of attachment,  judgment in the amount of __________________.

Amount paid  $0                                 Amount due: $______________________.  

                                                       CLAIM VII

                                                       [ RICO ]

                                                 NEGLIENCE

Plaintiff allege that the Defendant Donald Trump in his official capacity was negligent in enforcing unconstitutional, arbiratory law via the March 6, 2017 executive order and the plaintiff has been injured and damaged anPlaintiff has demanded property and Defendant has failed and refuse and continues to fail and to refuse, to remit the money and/or property although duly demanded requiring immediate injunctive relief and the Plaintiff has been damaged and continues to be damage and have damages  as follows:

_____________________                                                     $_______________

This amount is due and now owing, and the Plaintiff is entitled to writ of attachment,  judgment in the amount of __________________.

Amount paid  $0                                 Amount due: $______________________.  

                                                       CLAIM VIII

                                                       [ RICO ]

                                        PUNITIVE DAMAGE

Plaintiff allege that the Defendant Donald Trump in his official capacity had conscious disregard for the Claimant civil rights and/or Declaration of human rights and the plaintiff has been injured and damaged and has demanded property and Defendant has failed and refuse and continues to fail and to refuse, to remit the money and/or property although duly demanded requiring immediate injunctive relief and the Plaintiff has been damaged and continues to be damage and have damages  as follows:

_____________________                                                     $_______________

This amount is due and now owing, and the Plaintiff is entitled to writ of attachment,  judgment in the amount of __________________.

Amount paid  $0                                 Amount due: $______________________.  

WRIT OF MANDUMUS

CLAIM #V

DECLARATORY JUDGMENT

An actual controversy has arisen and now exists between plaintiff and defendant Loretta E. Lynch in her official capacity as United States Attorney General and/or “the Class Representative Bridgewater,” concerning their respective rights and duties in that plaintiff Representative contends “she at all times mention has been harmed and damaged and continues to be damaged by Loretta Lynch’s actions.  This court is now vested with appropriate jurisdiction and power to declare the rights and legal relations of the parties “The United States..et al,” are entitled to the declaration, the declaration to have the force and effect of a final judgment aor decree, and to be reviewable as a final judgment or decree, and further this court may adjudge and decree and declare that the rights and legal relations of the parties      to the  subject matter here in controversy, in order that the declaration shall have the force and effect of a final judgment and decree.

                                 a.  fully vested with the right to prosecute, via the Private Attorney General

Statue (RICO) and/or collect and/or recover fines et al on behalf of the

United States Government .

                                 b. Barak H.Obama(AKA Barry Soertoes) and/or “et als,” can not exert

executive privilege, and declare that the Plaintiff may amend her

                                      complaint to add Barak H. Obama in his individually capacity as United

                                      States President.

                                 c.. “The United States ex rel Sharon Bridgewater Private Attorney General

and/or Qui Tam Relator(Claimant et al )is fully  vested with the right to

have a writ of quo warranto issued upon Loretta Lynch in her official

capacity as United States Attorney General.

                                d. That this court adjudge and decree that Lynch and/or Barak H. Obama

violated the “The United States ex rel Sharon Bridgewater Private

Attorney General and/or Qui Tam Relator(Claimant et al )class Plaintiff

 Have the right to pre-judgment attachment in the amount of $!25,000,000,000,000,000.00(Trillion Dollars) for the United States ex rel Sharon Bridgewater Private Attorney General and/or Qui Tam Relator.  $_____________________

e. That the Petiititioner is entitled to a summary judgment.

.

CLAIM #VI

INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

B. Irreparable Harm and Balancing of Hardships and E.ties

. On balance, Plaintiff’s hardship

in not being able to express his views and the public interest in protecting speechoutweigh the Government’s interest in suppressing an intimidating symbol.Plaintiffs has demonstrated a strong possibility of irreparable harm absent apreliminary injunction.  Millions of US Citizen are even now Marching toward Washington to oust Obama and/or Holder from Office. In order to prevent a National Riot this Court must take actions now to secure the safety and security of the United States of America.   The issuance of a pretrial restraining order is not discretionary: if the Government makes the re.red probable cause showing, the court must entertheorder.if not enjoined, will cause immediate and irreparable injury to the United States Government and continued loss of billions of dollars and have asserted claims of already presented sufficient facts to establish the elements of each of the claims there is a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of the plaintiff’s claim.

C. The Injury to Sharon Bridgewater  outweigh the harm an injunction may cause Defendants;

The entry of a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction giving Plaintiffs

Writ of attachment, assets, and/or a for the Defendants to post a bond will cause no harm whatsoever to Defendants and the prevention of eviction of camp take notice.  

.

D. The granting of the injunction would not harm the public interest.

Where a party demonstrates both the likelihood of success on the merits and irreparable. injury, it almost always will be the case that the public interest will favor the issuance of aninjunction will protect the public interest, protect the US Government from fraudulent false claims and prevent further RICO acts.   The Supreme Court has repeatedly emphasized that courts are vested with extensive e.table powers to fashion appropriate remedies to redress unlawful conduct.  An example, in Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Bd. of Educ., 402 U.. 1 (1971), the Supreme Court stated: Once a right and a violation have been shown, the scope of a district court’s e.table powers to remedy past wrongs is broad, for breadth and flexibility are inherent in e.tableremedies.“The essence of e.ty jurisdiction has been the power of the Chancellor to do e.ty and to mould each decree to the necessities of the particular case. Flexibility rather than rigidity has distinguished it. The qualities of mercy and practicality have made e.ty the instrument for nice adjustment and reconciliation between the public interest and private needs as well as between competing private claims.” Hecht Co. v. Bowles, 321 U.. 321, 329-330 (1944), also See also Mitchell v. Robert DeMario Jewelry, Inc., 361 U.. 288, 291-92 (1960)

Moreover, the Supreme Court has pointedly ruled that where “the public interest is involved. . . those e.table powers assume an even broader and more flexible character than when only a private controversy is at stake.” Porter v. Warner Holding, Co., 328 U.. 395, 398 (1946). Accord Virginian Ry. Co. v. Sys. Fed’n. No. 40, 300 U.. 515, 552 (1937) (“Courts of e.ty may, and frequently do, go much farther both to give and withhold relief in furtherance of the public interest than they are accustomed to go when only private interests are involved.”) (collecting cases); Golden State Bottling Co. v. NLRB, 414 U.. 168, 179-80 (1973) (same).12

In accordance with these principles, courts have imposed a wide variety of highly

intrusive e.table remedies in institutional reform litigation to remedy constitutional violations and to foster paramount public interests, including various structural reforms.13 Typically in such cases, the e.table relief afforded exceeds an injunction enjoining the proscribed conduct, and also encompasses compelled changes in practices, structural changes and prolonged court-supervision over implementation of the e.table relief. See generally, DOBBS, Vol. Two at 348-353.  The United States of America as well as class Plaintiff There are no adequate remedy at law. 

CLAIM #VII

MY PRAYER TO GOD IN HEAVEN

Wherefore , IT IS DECREED, ORDER, ADJUDGE

            1. THE STATE of Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming[the District of Columbia, the Common wealth of Puerto Rico, The US Virgin Island, Guam, theNorthern Marianna Islands, the American Samoa] EX REL Sharon Bridgewater (A.K.A. Sharon Abusalem, Sharon Davis) Private Attorney General and QUI TAM RELATOR[ FROM 1993 and continuing thru present]-  Real parties in interest

CLAIMANT AND/OR PLAINTIFF prays and/or declare that Loretta Lynch Social Security, ATF acts of Jan. 4, 2016 and/or May 9, 2016 unconstitutionally infringes upon Sharon Bridgewater and other class members one or more 2^nd 4^th, 5^th, 9^th, 10^th, 14^th, US Constitional rights amendementthe rights and/or breach her contract as US Attorney General and/or violated her oath of office and committeed a criminal act.

12..  Jugment in the amount of ____________________for claim #1 Libel, order the

             Defendants to immediately pay and issue writs of attachment.

     13..  Jugment in the amount of ____________________for claim #2 Violation of the Equal

              Protection 2^nd amendment and Violation of the Right   to bear Firearms(US

             Constitutional Amendment II), 42 USC SECTION 1983  order the Defendants to

               immediately pay and issue writs of  attachment.

      14..  Judement in the amount of ____________________for claim #3 neglience and order

              The  Defendants to immediately pay and issue writs of attachment.

      15..  Judgment in the amount of ____________________for claim #4 breach of contract 

               and

            order the Defendants to immediately pay and issue writs of attachment.

    16.. Declaratory Judgment declaring that Plaintiff is:

                                 a.  fully vested with the right to prosecute, via the Private Attorney General

Statue (RICO) and/or collect and/or recover fines et al on behalf of the

United States Government .

                                 b. Barak H.Obama(AKA Barry Soertoes) and/or “et als,” can not exert

executive privilege, and declare that the Plaintiff may amend her

                                      complaint to add Barak H. Obama in his individually capacity as United

                                      States President.

                                 c.. “The United States ex rel Sharon Bridgewater Private Attorney General

and/or Qui Tam Relator(Claimant et al )is fully  vested with the right to

have a writ of quo warranto issued upon Loretta Lynch in her official

capacity as United States Attorney General.

                                d. That this court adjudge and decree that Lynch and/or Barak H. Obama

violated the “The United States ex rel Sharon Bridgewater Private

Attorney General and/or Qui Tam Relator(Claimant et al )class Plaintiff

 Have the right to pre-judgment attachment in the amount of $!25,000,000,000,000,000.00(Trillion Dollars) for the United States ex rel Sharon Bridgewater Private Attorney General and/or Qui Tam Relator.  $_____________________

e. That the Petiititioner is entitled to a summary judgment.

.

17. .Equitable and/or Injunctive Relief Prejudgment writs of attachment in

$125,000,000,000,000,000.00 Judgment against Loretta

Lynch

     THIS COURT USD) to commence Relator’s  rehabilitation  i.e. food, shelter, clothing,  and

      transportation,  payable by the Office of the U.S. Attorney General, District of

       Columbia to the client trust account (Sharon Bridgewater)of the lawyer duly appointed by

    16.. udgment in the amount of $ 1,000,000,000,000,000 MILLION DOLLARS

           AGAINST LORETTA LYNCH IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY.

18.    Partial judgment in the amount of $ ___________________– payment of  ten thousand

U.S. Dollars ($10,000.00 )

 18.. That this Court liberally construe the RICO laws and thereby find and/or declare that all Defendants have associated with a RICO enterprise of persons and of other individuals who were associated in fact, all of whom did engage in, and whose activities did affect, interstate and foreign commerce in violation of the RICO law at 18 U.S.C. 1962(c) (Prohibited activities).

 19..That this Court liberally construe the RICO laws and thereby find that all Defendants have conducted and/or participated, directly or indirectly, in the affairs of said RICO enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity in violation of the RICO laws at 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961(5) (“pattern” defined) and 1962(c) supra.

20.  That all Defendants and all of their directors, officers, employees, agents, servants and all other persons in active concert or in participation with them, be enjoined temporarily during pendency of this action, and permanently thereafter, from associating with any RICO enterprise of persons, or of other individuals associated in fact, who do engage in, or whose activities do affect, interstate and foreign commerce.

21.. That all Defendants and all of their directors, officers, employees, agents, servants and all other persons in active concert or in participation with them, be enjoined temporarily during pendency of this action, and permanently thereafter, from conducting or participating, either directly or indirectly, in the conduct of the affairs of any RICO enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity in violation of the RICO laws at 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961(5) and 1962(c) supra.

22.That if Defendant  cannot be found within this District then all of their property within this istrict be attached in the sum of $125,000,000,000,000,1,000,000,000.00(one hundred and twenty five trillion and one million dollars, with interest thereon and cost, the sum sued for in this complaint.

23.  That judgment be entered against the dfenant in the sum of $$125,000,000,000,000,1,000,000,000.00(one hundred and twenty five trillion and one million dollars, together with interest and costs; and

24. That this Court order the attachment of said property pruusantot he aforesaid provovision of CPLR and FRCP 4(e) and Rule B(1) of the Supplenmtnal Rules for certain Admarility and Maritime claims: and

25.    That process in due form of law, according to the practices of this Honorable Court in causes of admirality and maritime jurisprudence, April issue agains the The Federal Reserve, foreign Officials, and all Defndants that all person having or claiming any interest therein be citized to apper and answer under oath, all and singular the matters aforesaid; that Plaitniff have a deree for its damaged aforesaid, with interest and cost; and that the The Federal Reserve, foreign Officials, and all Defndants be condemned and sld to stisfy plaintiff decree;

26.   That process in due form of law April issue against B citing it to appear and answer, under oath, all and singular, the matters aforesaid

27.   That the Court order, adjudge and decree that Plaitnifff have a decree against B for claim asserted gy plaintiff herein tooether with interest and costs and 

28.    To issue an order to the U.S. Department of Justice Loretta Lynch to show cause why she should not be held in criminal and/or civil contempt of court.

29.   To  attachment of said property pruusantot he aforesaid one or more supplemental rule B, C, D, E and/or F, 4(e) and Rule B(1) of the Supplenmtnal Rules for certain Admarility and Maritime claims: and/or

30.   That process in due form of law, according to the practices of this Honorable Court in causes of admirality and maritime jurisprudence, intangible and/or tangible property in and up to the amount of $$125,000,000,000,000,1,000,000,000.00(one hundred and twenty five trillion and one million dollars, and that all person having or claiming any interest therein be citized to apper and answer under oath, all and singular the matters aforesaid; that Plaitniff have a deree for its damaged aforesaid, with interest and cost; and that the $$125,000,000,000,000,1,000,000,000.00(one hundred and twenty five trillion and one million dollarsbe condemned and sld to stisfy plaintiff decree;

1. That process in due form of law April issue against B citing it to appear and answer, under oath, all and singular, the matters aforesaid;
2. That the Court order, adjudge and decree that Plaitnifff have a decree against B for claim asserted gy plaintiff herein tooether with interest and costs and 
3. That Plaintiff have such other and further relief as April be proper and that this Court scompettnetotgrnt.
4. That Plaintiff have such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, under the full range of relevant circumstances which have occasioned the instant action.
5. WRIT OF ATTACHMENT in the amount of Plaitniffs damages, tighter with interest thereon form the rrespective dates due, cost, disbursements, and reasonable attorney fees.
   1. That process in due form of law according to the practice of this court in cases of admirality and maritime jurisdiction April issue against the Defendant cititng it to apprear and answer all the matters described in this complaint.
   1. Plaintiff have such other and further relief in the premises as in law and justice in April be entitled to receive.

 (7) Order directing the U.S. Marshals Service to expedite Relator’s safe passage to Detroit,

      Michigan(home) 12070 W. Outer Drive, Detroit, Michigan 48223 USA; and,
    
(8) any and all other relief which this Court deems just and proper under the several circumstances

       which have occasioned the instant INITIAL APPLICATION e.g. Habeas Corpus relief,WRITS

     OF MANDUMUS(EXPUNGEMENT OF ARREST WARRANTS, ETC.), AND  relief

       from retaliatory actions, triple damages etc.

•  

• For judgment in the amount of Plaitniffdamgestogher with interettheron form the resptice dates due, cost, disburements, and reasonable attorney feees.

• Declare that Lynch actions are illegal and unlawful in that she can not obstruct justice and/or a congressional investigation .

• Declare thatthePlaintiff Bridgewater is unlawful held against her will and each and every arrest warrant of the Plaintiff is illegal and are void.

1. Declare that the Plaintiff Sharon and/or James Bridgewater is unlawful imprisoned against her will under the State of Michigan and Georgia, and/or California law.

1. Declare that Holder cannot withhold any information pertaining to this complaint, allegations, and the Plaintiff “Sharon Bridgewater” is entitled to injunctive relief

1. Declare that Lynch and/or Holder must produce all documents relating to any and all allegations made by the Plaintiffs and/or the Committeee and Oversight.

1. Deckare that Lynch is disqualified and/or declare that the Platniff Bridgewater can prosecute this action.

1. Under federal rules of Criminal Procedure – Rule 6, submit the name of Respondant Barak H. Obama in his official capacity, Loretta Lynch in her official capacity, Hillary Clinton “respondants,” and all other co-conspirator to a federal grand jury for [included common law grand jury letter-to all judges]for the crime of advocating the overthrow of the Constituional form of government of the United States, Treason, etc.(5 USC 3331, 5 USC 3333, 18 usc 1918 and Executive order No.s

1. Accordingly, all premises having been duly considered here, the United States now moves the Honorable Justices of this District Court for an ORDER to the 17A District Court  to show cause why Extraordinary Writs of Mandamus should not issue, commanding that Circuit Court to perform ‑‑ with all deliberate speed ‑‑ all duties owed to Appellant as specifically itemized above, beginning with a Habeas Corpus and/or Writs of mandamus to expunge arrest etc.

1. The United States moves for said ORDER, on the strengths of this PETITION and of the official records that are now before this Court, to reinstate a cause erroneously dismissed.

            grant the Petitioner all just and appropriate relief as deemed by this court.

I certify and/or Declare and/or state under penalty and perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed 1STday of August  2016 in Detroit, Michigan

_____________________________________

THE STATE of Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming[the District of Columbia, the Common wealth of Puerto Rico, The US Virgin Island, Guam, theNorthern Marianna Islands, the American Samoa] EX REL Sharon Bridgewater (A.K.A. Sharon Abusalem, Sharon Davis) Private Attorney General and QUI TAM RELATOR[ FROM 1993 and continuing thru present]-  Real parties in interest

_____________________

1. Accordingly, all premises having been duly considered here, the United States now moves the Honorable Justices of this District Court for an ORDER to the 17A District Court to show cause why Extraordinary Writs of Mandamus should not issue, commanding that Circuit Court to perform ‑‑ with all deliberate speed ‑‑ all duties owed to Appellant as specifically itemized above, beginning with a Habeas Corpus and/or Writs of mandamus to expunge arrest etc.

• The United States moves for said ORDER, on the strengths of this PETITION and of the official records that are now before this Court, to reinstate a cause erroneously dismissed.

• ISSUE AGAINST Defendants Loretta Lynch be cared to appear and answer the allegation of this Complaint;

• Issue a Writ of Qi Warrantor Loretta L. Lynch

• Private Attorney General, hereby exercises its statutory and appeal and moves this honorable Court for a Writ in the nature of Quo Warrantor to issue upon Loretta E. Lynching her official capacity as United States Attorney General to demonstrate by what lawful authorities each claims to preside as the United States of American Attorney General Intervener also moves this honorable Court for a routine ORDER to the District Court Clerk, commanding that Office formally to certify to the United States Attorney General  formal commanding that Office formally to certify appellant  for presentation of all evidence admissible in the instant appeal, and for argument(s) on the questions of the constitutionality of the above.

• That this Court liberally construe the RICO laws and thereby find and/or declare that all Defendants have associated with a RICO enterprise of persons and of other individuals who were associated in fact, all of whom did engage in, and whose activities did affect, interstate and foreign commerce in violation of the RICO law at 18 U.S.C. 1962(c) (Prohibited activities).

• That this Court liberally construe the RICO laws and thereby find that all Defendants have conducted and/or participated, directly or indirectly, in the affairs of said RICO enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity in violation of the RICO laws at 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961(5) (“pattern” defined).

• That all Defendants and all of their directors, officers, employees, agents, servants and all other persons in active concert or in participation with them, be enjoined temporarily during pendency of this action, and permanently thereafter, from associating with any RICO enterprise of persons, or of other individuals associated in fact, who do engage in, or whose activities do affect, interstate and foreign commerce.

• That all Defendants and all of their directors, officers, employees, agents, servants and all other persons in active concert or in participation with them, be enjoined temporarily during pendency of this action, and permanently thereafter, from conducting or participating, either directly or indirectly, in the conduct of the affairs of any RICO enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity in violation of the RICO laws at 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961(5) .

1. That if Defendant cannot be found within this District then all of their property within this district be attached in the sum of $________________________________, with interest thereon and cost, the sum sued for in this complaint.

1. That judgment be entered against the defendant in the sum of $_________________together with interest and costs; and

1. If for any reason it is alleged and/or found that Plaintiff is not entitled to the attachment of the Defendants property under Admiralty principle of foreign attachment, then in the, Plaintiff invokes the revision of Section 6201 to 6226 of the New York CPLR (and/or similar “50 State laws”).

1. this honorable Court for a Writ in the nature of Quo Warrantor to issue upon Loretta E. Lynching her official capacity as United States Attorney General to demonstrate by what lawful authorities claims to preside as the United States of American Attorney General commanding that Office formally to certify to the United States Attorney General  formal and the Intervener also moves this Court for a routine ORDER to the District Clerk, commanding that Office formally to certify Intervener’s intervention for presentation of all evidence admissible in the instant appeal, and for argument(s) on the questions of the constitutionality of the above.

1. All premises having been duly considered, Intervener respectfully requests this honorable Court to issue a routine ORDER to the U.S. Department of Justice Loretta E. Lynch to show because why she should not be held in criminal and/or civil contempt of court.

1. ate and prays that this Court order the attachment of said property pursuant to the aforesaid provision of CPLR and FRCP 4(e) and Rule B(1) of the Supplenmtnal Rules for certain Admarility and Maritime claims: and

1.  That process in due form of law, according to the practices of this Honorable Court in causes of admirality and maritime jurisprudence, April issue agains the The Federal Reserve, foreign Officials, and all Defndants that all person having or claiming any interest therein be citized to apper and answer under oath, all and singular the matters aforesaid; that Plaitniff have a deree for its damaged aforesaid, with interest and cost; and that the The Federal Reserve, foreign Officials, and all Defndants be condemned and sld to stisfy plaintiff decree;

1. That process in due form of law April issue against B citing it to appear and answer, under oath, all and singular, the matters aforesaid;

1. That the Court order, adjudge and decree that Plaitnifff have a decree against B for claim asserted gy plaintiff herein tooether with interest and costs and 

1. That Plaintiff have such other and further relief as April be proper and that this Court s compettnet ot grnt.

• That process in due form of law according to thepractice of this Honorable Court issue against the Defndants, citing them to appear and answer under oath all and singular the matters aforesaid;

• Declare that  Loretta E. Lynchaction constitute conspiracy under the color of law, and declare that Lynch is ineligle and/or disqualified as United States Attorney General.

• Declare Obama can not exert executive privledge.

• Judgment against Loretta LynchPrejudgment writs of Attachment for $100,000,000,000,0000,000(One Hundred Trillion Dollars via Loretta E. Lynch“Class Representative,”Million Dollars and prejudgment writ of attachment for  and Judgment against Barak Obama in her official capacity et al for $100,000,000,0000,0000  judgment for its damges with interest  and costs, agisnt the Defenants; and

• That this court grant Plaintiff such other and further relief as the justice of the cause April appear.

• To issue an order to the U.S. Department of Justice Loretta E. Lynchto show cause why she should not be held in criminal and/or civil contempt of court.
• To  attachment of said property pruusant ot he aforesaid provovision of CPLR and FRCP 4(e) and Rule B(1) of the Supplenmtnal Rules for certain Admarility and Maritime claims: and/or
• That process in due form of law, according to the practices of this Honorable Court in causes of admirality and maritime jurisprudence, April issue agains the stem ship, her enginces, tacke appearl. Etc. and that all person having or claiming any interest therein be citized to apper and answer under oath, all and singular the matters aforesaid; that Plaitniff have a deree for its damaged aforesaid, with interest and cost; and that the steamship__________be condemned and sld to stisfy plaintiff decree;
• That process in due form of law April issue against B citing it to appear and answer, under oath, all and singular, the matters aforesaid;
• That the Court order, adjudge and decree that Plaitnifff have a decree against B for claim asserted gy plaintiff herein tooether with interest and costs and 
• That Plaintiff have such other and further relief as April be proper and that this Court s compettnet ot grnt.
• That Plaintiff have such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, under the full range of relevant circumstances which have occasioned the instant action.
• All other relief in which this court may deem just and appropriate.
• Burification and/or Burificate all claims for relief .
• The Plaintiff request this court to tranfer and consolidate all related casesand further that this court issue a Writ of Certiorari in this cause  requiring Defendants to file the record of all matters relating to this decision with the Court; (b) that the Court issue an emergency stay of  enforcement of the decision pending review on the merits in this causeand that the Court review the decision of the Defendants, that  the final administrative  decision be reversed, and for such other relief as this court deems just.
• Accordingly, all premises having been duly considered here, the United States now moves the Honorable Justices of this District Court of Columbia for Loretta E. Lynchto show cause why Extraordinary Writs of Mandamus should not issue, commanding that Circuit Court to perform ‑‑ with all deliberate speed ‑‑ all duties owed to Appellant and/or Committee and Oversight.

• The United States moves for said ORDER, on the strengths of this PETITION and of the official records that are now before this District Court of Columbia, to reinstate a cause erroneously dismissed.

• That process ISSUE AGAINST Loretta E. Lynch be cired to appear and answer the allegatioin of this Complaint.

• Issue a Writ in the nature of Quo Warranto to issue upon Loretta E. Lynchin her official capacity as United States Attorney General to demonstrate by what lawful authorities each claims to preside as the United States of American Attorney General .
• All premises having been duly considered, Intervenor respectfully requests this honorable Court to issue a routine ORDER to the U.S. Department of Justice Loretta E. Lynchto show cause why she should not be held in criminal and/or civil contempt of court.
• To appoint Special Prosecutors and/or issue arrest warrants.

• That this Court liberally construe the RICO laws and thereby find and/or declare that all Defendants have associated with a RICO enterprise of persons and of other individuals who were associated in fact, all of whom did engage in, and whose activities did affect, interstate and foreign commerce in violation of the RICO law at 18 U.S.C. 1962(c) (Prohibited activities).

• That this Court liberally construe the RICO laws and thereby find that all Defendants have conducted and/or participated, directly or indirectly, in the affairs of said RICO enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity in violation of the RICO laws at 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961(5) (“pattern” defined) and 1962(c) supra.

• That all Defendants and all of their directors, officers, employees, agents, servants and all other persons in active concert or in participation with them, be enjoined temporarily during pendency of this action, and permanently thereafter, from associating with any RICO enterprise of persons, or of other individuals associated in fact, who do engage in, or whose activities do affect, interstate and foreign commerce.

• That all Defendants and all of their directors, officers, employees, agents, servants and all other persons in active concert or in participation with them, be enjoined temporarily during pendency of this action, and permanently thereafter, from conducting or participating, either directly or indirectly, in the conduct of the affairs of any RICO enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity in violation of the RICO laws at 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961(5) and 1962(c) supra.

• That if Defendant  cannot be found within this District then all of their property within this istrict be attached in the sum of $________________________________, with interest thereon and cost, the sum sued for in this complaint;

• That judgment be entered against the dfenant in the sum of $_________________together with interest and costs; and

• If for any reason it is alleged and/or found that Plaintiff is not entitled to the attachment of the Dfenants property under Admirality principle of foreign attachment, then in the, Plaintiff invokes the rovision of Section 6201 to 6226 of the New Yor CPLR(and/or similar “50 State laws”).
•  
•  
•  
• Title 18 U.S.C. §§ 2(a), 2(b), 1341, 1343, 1346, 1952, 1956, 1957,
• 2314, and 2315.
• ate and prays that this Court order the attachment of said property pruusant ot he aforesaid provovision of CPLR and FRCP 4(e) and Rule B(1) of the Supplenmtnal Rules for certain Admarility and Maritime claims: and
• That Plaintiff April have such other and further relief as in lawq and justice tit April be entitle to receive.

Wherefore, Plaintiff prays;

1.  That process in due form of law, according to the practices of this Honorable Court in causes of admirality and maritime jurisprudence, April issue agains the stem ship, her enginces, tacke appearl. Etc. and that all person having or claiming any interest therein be citized to apper and answer under oath, all and singular the matters aforesaid; that Plaitniff have a deree for its damaged aforesaid, with interest and cost; and that the steamship__________be condemned and sld to stisfy plaintiff decree;
2. That process in due form of law April issue against B citing it to appear and answer, under oath, all and singular, the matters aforesaid;
3. That the Court order, adjudge and decree that Plaitnifff have a decree against B for claim asserted gy plaintiff herein tooether with interest and costs and 
4. That Plaintiff have such other and further relief as April be proper and that this Court s compettnet ot grnt.
5.  

That Plaintiff have such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, under the full range of relevant circumstances which have occasioned the instant action.  Judgment WRIT OF ATTACHMENT in the amount of Plaitniffs damages, tighter with interest thereon form the rrespective dates due, cost, disbursements, and reasonable attorney fees.

1. That process in due form of law according to the practice of this court in cases of admirality and maritime jurisdiction April issue against the Defendant cititng it to apprear and answer all the matters described in this complaint.Plaintiff have such other and further relief in the premises as in law and justice in April be entitled to receive.

SCHEDULE[DESIGNATION OF SCHEDULE]

1.  Defendant’s  Status and addresss:
2. A. Unpon information and belief and at all times hereinafter mentioned, Defendant Barak H. Obama(AKA Barry Soertoes)  class representative was a [type of legaly entity]authorized under the laws of the United States Constition, with offices and a place of business at [Obama address]

DETAILS OF THE _________(S)

1.  Bill of Lading No.{ number of bill} dated {dated of bill of lading – 1993 thru  present] from [name of citiy], [name of county] to [name of city], [name of state] on the vessel [name of vessel], [one(1) container SAID TO CONTAIN: [description of contents], at the applicable tariff charge of $____________dollar amount of ttarriff charge EXhits { of exhibit}

Amount Paid:                                                                        Amount Due:____________

                                         SUMMARY OF DAMAGES

Summary of Reasonable Counsel’s Fees:          TBA

Summary of Consequential Damages:              TBA

Summary of Actual Damages (partial list):

     unpaid professional invoices:        $    10,000.000000000000000

     triple damage multiplier (3x):       $    325,050.0000000000000000

     copyright infringements, actual:     $163,800,000.00000000000000

     triple damage multiplier (3x):       $491,400,000.0000000000000000

Subtotal:                     $11111,310,833,400.00

     TOTAL DAMAGES (minimum):           $5,243,333,600.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

COMES NOW SHARON[DAVIS- ABUSALEM]BRIDGEWATER VIA “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PEOPLE OF THE 50 STATES(AND/OR HUMANITY)AND CLERK, JUDGE, JURY, PROSECUTOR, “U.S. MARSHAL”(18 U.S. Code § 3053 – Powers of marshals and deputies” AND/OR 8 U.S. Code § 566) PURUSANT TO AND EXECUTIONER PURSUANT TO LEGAL RIGHT VIA THE RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATON ACT(RICO) AND/OR ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME LAW GIVE NOTICE OF FORFEITURE OF ALL TANGIBLE AND INTANGIBLE PROPERTY(INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ALL “SECRET” CONCENTRATION CAMPS, “BOX RAILROAD-TRACK TRAIN CARS FOR THE TRANSPORTATION OF “THE FINAL HOLOCAUST VICTIMS,” GUILLOTINES, FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT(FEMA) CASKETS “MILLIONS” – SEE BELOW)YESHUA/JESUS CHRIST, REPRESENTATIVE OF THE TWELVE TRIBES OF ISRAELAPPEARS BEFORE “THE GOD OF THE EARTH” JACOB ROTHCHILD(SATAN’S REPRESENTATIVE – THE GOD OF THIS EARTH, THE THIRTEENTH BLOOD LINES, SATANIST, FATHER OF LIES, DECEPTION, CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD THE TWO SHARON[DAVIS-ABUSALEM] BRIDGEWATER VIA”THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR(A WOMEN AND VICTIM OF TRUMP, GARLAND, BIDEN, HARRIS, OBAMA “U.S. GOVERNMENT STATE ACTORS” CONTINUAL VIOLENCE AND OPPRESSION, RENDERED DISABLED BY THEIR HEINOUS ACTS OR OMISSION FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING TO JAN. 1, 2009 AND FURTHER CONTINUING THRUINTENTIONAL” CONTINUAL VIOLENCE AND OPPRESSION BY PRESENT)AND THE SHARON[DAVIS-ABUSALEM] BRIDGEWATER VIA”THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR(A )(SEE REVELATION 12 – ALSO SEE AMERICA JUDGED ON THIS WEBSITE– SEPTEMBER 23, 2017) BEFORE, STATUE OF LIMITATIONS TOLLED

THE CLAIM

NOTICE OF ADJUDIFICATION, OF CONVICTION, JUDGMENT AND SENTENCING AS FOLLOWS:

IT IS DECREED, ORDED AND AJUJECTS THAT ALL ALL PRESIDENTS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT ARE ALL GUILTY OF TREASON, RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY AND, ALL ILLEGALLY UPURPS PUBLIC OFFICE

ALL WRITS, OPINION, JUDGMENTS ORDERS ARE NULL AND VOID AND WITHOUT ANY LEGAL EFFECT, CONTRACTS WITH THE ENEMY ARE

DECREE, ENJOINS AND RESTRAIN BIDEN, VIA ARREST, AND IMPRISONMENT

ARREST WARRANTS IN REM

INJUNCTION AND ARREST WARRANT FOR BIDEN HERE(18 U.S.C. section 912, treason, racketeering conspiracy, genocide violation ofthe number

Biden aobstrcution of justice , trump, garland, biden and the marogo raid special master – aiding and betting18 U.S.C. 2382 – jan. 6,

https://thefederalist.com/2022/09/06/special-master-order-reveals-bidens-direct-involvement-in-trump-raid-and-six-other-bombshells/

degreed that all inflitrate the racketeer u.s. presidental ecetions via null and void and without any leady e

Adjudications are by their nature retroactive applications of the law.

ATTACHMENT – ARREST WARRANTS HERE

THE CLAIM

(AGAINST THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP)

(A public private/partnership)

EXH.A

JOE BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS, DONALD TRUMP, MICK PENCE, ET AL KNOWINGLY COMMITTED CRIMINAL ACTS, & ACTED IN JOINT PARTICIPATION GRANTED CHINA SOVERIEGNTY OVER THE UNITED STATES TO ENSLAVE AND/OR BEHEAD ALL WHO DO NOT WORSHIP SATAN(“LITERALLY”)

.

BIDEN AND HARRIS CONSPIRED WITH ONE OR MORE MERRICK GARLAND, XI JIPING, RUSSIA PUTIN, DONALD TRUMP AND WILLIAM BARR TO DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES IS EQUALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR REBELLION AND/OR INSURRECTION IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S. Code § 2383(SEE BELOW) CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD THE U.S.A. IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 371, VIOLATIONS OF THE NUREMBERG CODE, RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY, VIOLENT CRIMES IN AID OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY, FALSE IMPRISONMENT, FALSE ARREST, ILLEGALLY AND WRONGFULLY HOLDING THE OFFICE OF THE U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL BY FORCE AND WITHOUT THE RIGHT, PRETENDING TO BE AN OFFICER OR EMPLOYEE OF THE UNITED STATES IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 912 AND HOST OF OTHER CRIMES SEE BELOW: 18 U.S. Code § 912 – Officer or employee of the United States, A HOST OF OTHER CRIMES SEE BELOW:

COMES NOW THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY AND/OR RELATOR, INJURED AND DAMAGED IN BUSINESS, PERSON OR PROPERTY, RESTRAINED FROM INTERSTATE AND/OR FOREIGN COMMERCE FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO BIDEN’S TERM]JOE BIDEN & KAMALA HARRIS FAILURE TO PROTECT U.S. BOARDERS(AND HIS PREDECCESSORS ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, RACKETEERING IMMIRGARATION POLICIES ALL U.S. CE

& VIOLATING AND/OR COMMITTING ONE OR MORE SECTION 1961(1)(F)THE IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY ACT – RACKETEERING OFFENSES – BRING IN AND/OR HARBOR ILLEGAL ALIENS INDICTABLE UNDER THE INMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY ACT, I.E, SECTION 274

AID, ABET AND ASSIST ALIENS TO ENTER THE U.S.A. IN VIOLATION OF 277 or section 278 (relating to importation of aliens for immoral purposes) FOR FINANCIAL GAIN AS CODIFIED 8 U.S.C. §§ 1324, 1327 and 1328(FOR PROFIT)FAILURE TO MAINTAIN BORDERS AS FOLLOWS:

• VIOLATING AND/OR COMMITTING ONE OR MORE SECTION 1961(1)(F)THE IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY ACT – RACKETEERING OFFENSES – BRING IN AND/OR HARBOR ILLEGAL ALIENS INDICTABLE UNDER THE INMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY ACT, I.E, SECTION 274
• AID, ABET AND ASSIST ALIENS TO ENTER THE U.S.A. IN VIOLATION OF 277 or section 278 (relating to importation of aliens for immoral purposes) FOR FINANCIAL GAIN AS CODIFIED 8 U.S.C. §§ 1324, 1327 and 1328.

Biden(AN ILLEGAL IMMIGRATE – SEE OBAMA PAGE – ALL JUDGES DISMISSED ALL PLAINTIFFS ENTITLED “PLAINTIFFS” VS. BARAK H. OBAMA A.K.A BARRY SOERTOES EXACTLY LIKE THEY DISMISSED ALL MY COMPLAINT OVER THE COURSE OF NON-STOP CONTINUAUL ENTITLED SHARON BRIDGEWATER VS. BARAK H. OBAMA) DACA Obama Anemsty Program(IS NOW BIDEN AND HARRIS OPEN BORDER DOOR POLICY-SEE BELOW) constitute aiding and/or assisting certain aliens to enter the United States  in violation of one or more section 1324, 1327, and/or 1328

KAMALA HARRIS CO-CONSPIRATOR ACTS OR OMISSIONS CONSTITUTE AIDING, ABETTING OR CONSPIRING WITH JOE BIDE TO ALLOW IMMIGRATES IN TO THE U.S. TO FUTHER THE “INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL ENTERPRIZE AGENDA!!”

IMMIGRATION IN THE U.S.A. HIT A RECORD 46.2 MILLION(THE HIGHEST RECORDED IN U.S. HISTORY)IN ONE MONTH!!

CLIKC HERE FOR ARREST WARRANT AND INJUNCTION FOR KAMALA HARRIS AND GAVIN NEWSOME AS FOLLOWS

ALL UNDER ARREST ARE SENTENCE TO LIFE IN PRISION AND/OR THE DEATH PENALITY!!

MERRICK GARLAND THE U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL AND HEAD OF THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AND THE “HEAD(OVERSEE)AND” OF THE EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMRIGATION REVIEW. The primary mission of the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) is to adjudicate immigration cases by fairly, expeditiously, and uniformly interpreting and administering the Nation’s immigration laws. Under delegated authority from the Attorney General, EOIR conducts immigration court proceedings, appellate reviews, and administrative hearings.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

The Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) was created on January 9, 1983, through an internal Department of Justice (DOJ) reorganization which combined the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA or Board) with the Immigration Judge function previously performed by the former Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) (now part of the Department of Homeland Security). Besides establishing EOIR as a separate agency within DOJ, this reorganization made the Immigration Courts independent of INS, the agency charged with enforcement of Federal immigration laws. The Office of the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer (OCAHO) was added in 1987. In 2013, EOIR observed its 30th anniversary.

EOIR is also separate from the Immigration and Employee Rights Section in the DOJ Civil Rights Division and the Office of Immigration Litigation in the DOJ Civil Division.

As an office within the Department of Justice, EOIR is headed by a Director who reports directly to the Deputy Attorney General. Its headquarters are located in Falls Church, Virginia, about 10 miles from downtown Washington, DC.

MERRICK GARLAND ACTS OR OMISSIONS AND FAILURE TO “OVERSEE” HIS STAFF ACTS OR OMISSIONS AND/OR FAILURE TO MAINTAIN OUR BORDERS, CONSTITUTE

VIOLATING AND/OR COMMITTING ONE OR MORE SECTION 1961(1)(F)THE IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY ACT – RACKETEERING OFFENSES – BRING IN AND/OR HARBOR ILLEGAL ALIENS INDICTABLE UNDER THE INMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY ACT, I.E, SECTION 274

AID, ABET AND ASSIST ALIENS TO ENTER THE U.S.A. IN VIOLATION OF 277 or section 278 (relating to importation of aliens for immoral purposes) FOR FINANCIAL GAIN AS CODIFIED 8 U.S.C. §§ 1324, 1327 and 1328(FOR PROFIT)AND THE TWO WITNESSES(BOTH SHARON AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER) HAVE BEEN INJURED AND DAMAGED BY GARLAND ACTS OR OMISSIONS AND GARLAND IS LIABLE FOR DAMAGES

DECREE,ORDER, ENJOINS AND RESTRAIN MERRICK GARLAND FROM ILLEGALLY, UNLAWFULLY UPURPING THE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL WITHOUT THE RIGHT AS FOLLOWS:

KAMALA HARRIS(VICE PRESIDENT), NANCY PEOLOSI(SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE), CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR GAVIN NEWSOME, FLORIDA GOVERNOR RON DESANTIS AND/OR SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE NANCY PELOSI IMMIGRATION RACKETEERINGACTS OR OMISSIONS IMMIGRATION AND RACKETEERING(INJUNCTION AND ARREST WARRANT)!!

ACTS OR OMISSIONS AND FAILURE TO MAINTAIN OUR BORDERS, CONSTITUTE

VIOLATING AND/OR COMMITTING ONE OR MORE SECTION 1961(1)(F)THE IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY ACT – RACKETEERING OFFENSES – BRING IN AND/OR HARBOR ILLEGAL ALIENS INDICTABLE UNDER THE INMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY ACT, I.E, SECTION 274

AID, ABET AND ASSIST ALIENS TO ENTER THE U.S.A. IN VIOLATION OF 277 or section 278 (relating to importation of aliens for immoral purposes) FOR FINANCIAL GAIN AS CODIFIED 8 U.S.C. §§ 1324, 1327 and 1328(FOR PROFIT)AND THE TWO WITNESSES(BOTH SHARON AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER) HAVE BEEN INJURED AND DAMAGED BY GARLAND ACTS OR OMISSIONS AND GARLAND IS LIABLE FOR DAMAGES

CLICK HERE FOR GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA RON DESANTIS AND/OR SPEAKER OF THE HOUS NANCY PELOSI IMMIGRATION RACKETEERING INJUNCTION AND/OR ARREST WARRANTS!!

DECREE,ORDER, ENJOINS AND RESTRAIN GAVIN NEWSOME FROM ILLEGALLY, UNLAWFULLY UPURPING THE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL WITHOUT THE RIGHT AS FOLLOWS:

WITH F JOE BIDEN[KAMALA HARRIS, MERRICK GARLAND “CRIMINAL CLASS REPRESENTATIVES” ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, U.S. LEGISLATORS, “GOVERNORS, MAYORS, ETC. EMPLOYEES OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT,” MAJOR CORPORATIONS, AND FOREIGN OFFICIALS FOR THEIR ACTS OR OMISSIONS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT”] ADOPTION OF DONALD TRUMP, ET AL SCHEME TO DEFRAUD BOTH SHARON AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER OUT OF MONEY AND/OR PROPERTY WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW), USED THREAT, COERCION, DECEPTION TO TRICK ONE OR BOTH WITNESSES TO TAKE THE COV-19 INJECTION(IN VIOLATION OF THE NUREMBERG CODE)ISSUED EXECUTIVE ORDER 14067 TO DO AWAY ALL CASH(STEAL ALL OUR CASH IN THE BANK AND FORCE US TO BUY ONLY WHAT THEY APPROVE – “ENSLAVEMENT”

-CLICK HERE-VERY IMPORTANT

TWO WITNESSES(ALL. U.S. CITIZENS AND/OR HUMANITY)”ALL” OUR HARD EARN MONEY IN THE BANK[ALL RETIREMENT FUNDS, 401K’S, MUTUAL FUNDS “EVERYTHING”] FORCE THE TWO WITNESSES(ALL U.S. CITIZENS AND HUMANITY) US TO COMPLY WITH WHATEVER THEY WANT, & PROPERTY AND ENSLAVE US BY USING A DIGITAL DOLLAR-“CUT ON OR OFF”

AT WILL BY THE U.S. GOVERNMENT!!

FOR ILLEGAL, UNLAWFUL SCHEME TO “STEAL” THE

video here – central bank digital currencies: freedom dies!

BIDEN GRANTS(ATTEMPTS)TO U.S. SOVERIGNTY TO CHINA A COUNTRY(“THAT DO NOT NOT BELIEVE IN HUMAN RIGHTS”) GOING BANKRUPT SEE BELOW:

FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE BIDEN GIVES OR ATTEMPTS TO GIVE CHINA HANDING OVER U.S. NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY & OVER ULTIMATE CONTROL OF AMERICA’S HEALTH CARE SYSTEM(OBAMACARE) IS Mass surveillance in China,”Predictive Policing,” China social credit system, China Cashless Society which, COLLECT MEN AND WOMEN DNA TO INPUT IN A SUPERCOMPUTER VIA COV-19 TEST KITS SENT TO HOSPITAL AND/OR LABS

https://www.republicworld.com/world-news/rest-of-the-world-news/china-involved-in-illegal-gene-harvesting-dna-collection-of-uyghurs-iffras-report.html

https://www.thetrumpet.com/24057-why-is-china-collecting-american-dna

https://www.geneticsandsociety.org/article/china-collecting-dna-tens-millions-men-and-boys-using-us-equipment

https://www.republicworld.com/world-news/rest-of-the-world-news/china-involved-in-illegal-gene-harvesting-dna-collection-of-uyghurs-iffras-report.html

THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS BIDEN SUBMITTED TO THE WHO AS FOLLOWS:

ALSO, BIDEN GIVES CHINA ACCESS TO THE U.S. POWER GRID!!

-CLICK HERE-

– CHINA GOT ‘the two witnesses ” and/or humanity DNA VIA U.S. SUPREME GRANTS COLLECTION OF “ALL dna WITHOUT PROBALBE CAUSE – SEE BELOW U.S. SUPREME COURT ORDER) parallel with Biden’s March 9, 2022 Digital Forms of Currency

In the United States, there are both federal and state laws prohibiting treason. Treason is defined on the federal level in Article III, Section 3 of the United States Constitution as: “only in levying War against [the United States], or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.” Most state constitutions include similar definitions of treason, specifically limited to levying war against the state, “adhering to the enemies” of the state, or aiding the enemies of the state, and requiring two witnesses or a confession in open court.

COVID “PLANDEMIC” “MODELED AFTER THE WORLD ECONOMIC CRISIS 1929-1939.(CURRENT STOCK MARKET MANPULATION SETTING THE STAGE FOR COLLAPSE OF THE STOCK MARKET/WALL STREET) SIMILAR TO LARGE-SCALE UNEMPLOYMENT, SOCIAL DISLOCATION WHICH CONTRIBUTED TO THE RISE OF NAZISM IN GERMANY AND ADOLF HITLER, AND THE POPULATRITY OF COMMUNISM(PEOPLE WHERE MOR ACCEPTANC – AND NAZI SOCIAL DISTANCING) IT PARALELL WITH “MASS LARGE SCALE UNEMPLOYMENT” SOCIAL DISLOCATION AND THE RISE AND/OR ACCEPTANCE VIA THE COVID “PLANDEMIC” SAME WITH THE THE PANDEMIC CAUSE GREAT DEPRESSION

CONSOLIDATE WITH COMMUNIST CHINA, PREDICTIVE POLICING, DO A “GREAT RESET”

CONCEALED KNOWN FACTS THEY WERE UNDER A DUTY TO DISCLOSED, USED TRICK SCHEME AND COERCION TO “FORCE” ONE OR BOTH WITNESSES TO TAKE AND COV-19 INJECTIONS, BY BIDEN MANDATES IN WHICH ALL ANIMINAL DIED IN STUDIES AND VIOLED THE NUREMBERG CODE REFERRED TO THE TWO WITNESSES(AND HUMAN BEINGS – “HUMANITY”) AS “HACKABLE ANIMALS!!”

The Nuremberg Code (1947)

Permissible Medical Experiments

The great weight of the evidence before us to effect that certain types of medical experiments on human beings, when kept within reasonably well-defined bounds, conform to the ethics of the medical profession generally. The protagonists of the practice of human experimentation justify their views on the basis that such experiments yield results for the good of society that are unprocurable by other methods or means of study. All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:

1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.
   
   The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results justify the performance of the experiment.
4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability or death.
8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
9. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
10. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.

-CLICK HERE-

VIA ADMARILTY AND/OR MARITIME LAW, BURIFICATION OF TRIAL, AND NOTICE OF CONVICTION AND SENTENCE AND ALL se concurrent jurisdiction over admiralty cases in which plaintiffs seek traditional common law remedies)- AND ADJUDICATION OF IN PERSONAM(AND/OR QUI ADMIRALTYPROPERTY IS FORFEITED TO “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR AS FOLLOWS, “TAKING SATAN’S JOB IN HEAVEN(AS CHIEF MUSICIAN, PRAISE AND WORSHIP OF THE HEAVENLY CREATOR)TAKING ALL OF SATAN MONEY, FORFEITED BY PRIDE, WRONG :ELOW)YESHUA/JESUS CHRIST, REPRESENTATIVE OF THE TWELVE TRIBES OF ISRAELAPPEARS BEFORE “THE GOD OF THE EARTH” JACOB ROTHCHILD(SATAN’S REPRESENTATIVE – THE GOD OF THIS EARTH, THE THIRTEENTH BLOOD LINES, SATANIST, FATHER OF LIES, DECEPTION, CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD THE TWO SHARON[DAVIS-ABUSALEM] BRIDGEWATER VIA”THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR(A WOMEN AND VICTIM OF TRUMP, GARLAND, BIDEN, HARRIS, OBAMA “U.S. GOVERNMENT STATE ACTORS” CONTINUAL VIOLENCE AND OPPRESSION, RENDERED DISABLED BY THEIR HEINOUS ACTS OR OMISSION FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING TO JAN. 1, 2009 AND FURTHER CONTINUING THRUINTENTIONAL” CONTINUAL VIOLENCE AND OPPRESSION BY PRESENT)AND THE SHARON[DAVIS-ABUSALEM] BRIDGEWATER VIA”THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR(A )(SEE REVELATION 12 – ALSO SEE AMERICA JUDGED ON THIS WEBSITE– SEPTEMBER 23, 2017) BEFORE, STATUE OF LIMITATIONS TOLLED

SEE BELOW DECLARATORY JUDGMENT, BI-LATERAL CLASS REPRESENTATIVES, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION, ARREST WARRANTS IN REM AND OTHER ADMIRALITY AND/OR MARITIME DOCUMENTS

(ON BEHALF OF MYSELF, MY SON JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER, U.S. CITIZENS, THE SAINTS OF GOD IN HEAVEN AND/OR OF “HUMANITY,” MEN AND WOMEN CREATED IN THE IMAGE OF GOD IN HEAVEN, YESHUA/JESUS CHRIST – GOD, THE 12 TRIBES OF ISRAEL (ON BEHALF OF JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER, U.S. CITIZENS AND/OR HUMANITY) A VICTIM AND FEDERAL WITNESS, INJURED AND DAMAGED IN BUSINESS, PERSON OR PROPERTY & RESTRAINED FROM INTERSTATE AND/OR FOREIGN COMMERCE FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT (ON BEHALF OF HERSELF, HER SON – THE SECOND WITNESS AND VICTIM OF A U.S. GOVERNMENT VICTIM AND FEDERAL WITNESS INJURED AND DAMAGED BY THE COV-19 INJECTION, RESTRAIN VIA “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL( AND/OR RELATOR A QUALIFIED FEDERAL BEING DULY)REPRESENTATIVE OF “HUMANITY,” MEN AND WOMEN CREATED IN THE IMAGE OF GOD IN HEAVEN, YESHUA/JESUS CHRIST – GOD, THE 12 TRIBES OF ISRAEL – JUDGE, JURY, PROSECUTOR, CLERK AND EXECUTOR, PURSUANT TO MY “COMMON LAW RIGHT VIA ADMARILTY AND/OR MARITIME LAW, BURIFICATION OF TRIAL, AND NOTICE OF CONVICTION AND SENTENCE AND ALL se concurrent jurisdiction over admiralty cases in which plaintiffs seek traditional common law remedies)- AND ADJUDICATION OF IN PERSONAM(AND/OR QUI ADMIRALTYPROPERTY IS FORFEITED TO “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR AS FOLLOWS, “TAKING SATAN’S JOB IN HEAVEN(AS CHIEF MUSICIAN, PRAISE AND WORSHIP OF THE HEAVENLY CREATOR)TAKING ALL OF SATAN MONEY, FORFEITED BY PRIDE, WRONG :

COMES NOW SHARON[DAVIS- ABUSALEM]BRIDGEWATER VIA “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PEOPLE OF THE 50 STATES(AND/OR HUMANITY)AND CLERK, JUDGE, JURY, PROSECUTOR, “U.S. MARSHAL”(18 U.S. Code § 3053 – Powers of marshals and deputies” AND/OR 8 U.S. Code § 566) PURUSANT TO AND EXECUTIONER PURSUANT TO LEGAL RIGHT VIA THE RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATON ACT(RICO) AND/OR ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME LAW GIVE NOTICE OF FORFEITURE OF ALL TANGIBLE AND INTANGIBLE PROPERTY(INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ALL “SECRET” CONCENTRATION CAMPS, “BOX RAILROAD-TRACK TRAIN CARS FOR THE TRANSPORTATION OF “THE FINAL HOLOCAUST VICTIMS,” GUILLOTINES, FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT(FEMA) CASKETS “MILLIONS” – SEE

, BURIFICATION OF TRIAL, AND NOTICE OF CONVICTION AND SENTENCE AND ALL se concurrent jurisdiction over admiralty cases in which plaintiffs seek traditional common law remedies)- AND ADJUDICATION OF IN PERSONAM(AND/OR QUI ADMIRALTYPROPERTY IS FORFEITED TO “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR AS FOLLOWS, “TAKING SATAN’S JOB IN HEAVEN(AS CHIEF MUSICIAN, PRAISE AND WORSHIP OF THE HEAVENLY CREATOR)TAKING ALL OF SATAN MONEY, FORFEITED BY PRIDE, WRONG :

AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT FOR THE PEOPLE OF THE “50 STATES” AND/OR “HUMANITY” VIA THE RACKETEERED ININGJ “U.S. MARSHAL”(18 U.S. Code § 3053 – Powers of marshals and deputies” AND/OR 8 U.S. Code § 566) PURUSANT TO AND EXECUTIONER PURSUANT TO LEGAL RIGHT VIA THE RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATON ACT(RICO) AND/OR ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME LAWMY “COMMON LAW RIGHT VIA ADMARILTY AND/OR MARITIME LAW 

PROSECUTOR, JUDGE, JURY(ONE OR MORE CLERK, U.S. MARSHAL)