NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW!!

THIS MEANS THAT NO PERSON, GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL OR GOVERNMENT(INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO FOREIGN GOVERNMENT OR OFFICIAL) IS ABOVE THE LAW!! THE FOLLOWING PRINCIPLES ARE FUNDAMENTAL IN PRESERVING THE RULE OF LAW: ALL PEOPLE ARE RULED BY THE LAW. LAW ENFORCERS, THE GOVERNMENT AND JUDGES MUST ADHERE TO THE LAW(AND WITHOUTOUT BIAS OR PREJUDUDICE).

THE UNITED 50 STATES AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ARE NOT THE SAME IN ONE!! THE UNITED 50 STATES REPRESENT THE PEOPLE OF THE 50 STATES AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA REPRESENTS THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT!!

THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION IS THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND!! THE SUPREMACY CLAUSE OF THE UNITED STATES PROVIDES THAT COURTS ARE BOUND BY THE CONSTITUTION(THE SUPREME LAW)!!

EVERY U.S. CITIZEN (PEOPLE OF THE 50 STATES) IS GUARANTEED U.S. CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AS DEFINED IN THE U.S. CONSTITUTION; AND HAVE RIGHTS AS DEFINED IN THE UNIVERSAL DECLARATION FOR HUMAN RIGHTS!!

ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME LAW PROVIDES COMMON LAW REMEDIES(Congress allowed state courts to exercise concurrent jurisdiction over admiralty cases in which plaintiffs seek traditional common law remedies)- AND ADJUDICATION OF IN PERSONAM ADMIRALTY AND/OR MARITIME

CAUSE OF ACTION AGAINST ONE OR MORE BIDEN, HARRIS, MERRICK GARLAND(“CRIMINAL CLASS REPRESENTATIVES”) FOR THEIR “CRIMINAL ACTS AND CONSPIRACY TO ENGAGE IN A PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY VIA ACTS OR OMISSIONS AGAINST BRIDGEWATER BUSINESS, PERSON OR PROPERTY (SEE BELOW FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT)

(“maritime” referred to the cases arising upon the high seas, whereas “admiralty” meant primarily cases of a local nature involving police regulations common law courts “of all civil causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, including all seizures under laws of impost, navigation or trade of the United States, where the seizures are made, on waters which are navigable from the sea by vessels saving to suitors, in all cases, the right of a common law remedy, where the common law is competent to give it . . .) .”⁹0Savings to Suitors Clause provides jurisdiction to state courts in cases that usually involve minor personal injury that could be resolved by common law.(AS IN THE CASE WITH SAN FRANCISCO SUPERIOR COURT CASE ENTITLED SHARON BRIDGEWATER VS. HAYES VALLEY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP – DEPRIVATION OF ACCESS TO COURTS AND/OR RIGHT TO FILE A FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT IN ALL U.S. FEDERAL COURTS, THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN A SCHEME TO DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES -“BY OPERATION OF LAW AND/OR PURSUANT TO COMMON LAW REMEDIES THE COMPLAINT FILED IN THE SUPERIOR COURT(STATE COURT)OF SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA IS “VALID”!!

THE PLAINTIFF AND/OR CLAIMANT -“THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR(AND/OR SHARON BRIDGEWATER AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER) SEEK COMMON LAW REMEDIES(CONTINUE READING – ALSO PROVIDES THAT GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL ARE NOT IMMUNE FROM SUIT – SEE WEBSITE) !!

This admiralty and/or maritime claim “open court proceeding” have Common law jurisdiction for deprivation and denial of court access via 42 plus dismissed complaint of valid claims(judicial racketeering- see below related cases) of the two witnesses right to file a first amended complaint[pursuant to a Superior Court Judge Order see below (pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure every Plaintiff is allowed to file a first amended complaint “by right” without leave of the court – plaintiff to amend their complaint one time within 21 days of serving the original complaint or at any point before the defendant answers – Rule 15 provides that the court should allow the plaintiff to amend the complaint when justice requires it)from August 4, 2008 and continuing thru present provides and this admiralty and/or maritime claim by operation of law is “the first amended complaint.” Congress allowed state courts to exercise concurrent jurisdiction over admiralty cases in which plaintiffs seek traditional common law remedies.

THE PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY

scanned-image_05-31-2022-120437 Download

scanned-image_05-31-2022-185335 Download

dismissal of all valid clurts in admiralty is therefore an amalgam of the general maritime law insofar as it is acceptable to the courts, modifications of that law by congressional amendment, the common law of torts and contracts as modified to the extent constitutionally possible by state legislation, and international prize law. This body of law is at all times subject to modification by the paramount authority of Congress acting in pursuance of its powers under the Admiralty and Maritime Clause and the Necessary and Proper Clause and, no doubt, the Commerce Clause, now that the Court’s interpretation of that clause has become so expansive. Of this power there has been uniform agreement among the Justices of the Court.

COMMON LAW REMEDIES ALLOWS “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR TO REPLACE AND USE A “COURT MADE STAMP” TO REPLACE ALL U.S. COURT DOCUMENTS AND/OR ACT AS A SYMBOL TO “OFFICIATE, APPROVE AND/OR ACT AS A SIGNET FOR ALL COURT DOCUMENTS ENTITLED “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR”

“THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR OFFICIAL SYMBOL AS FOLLOW(USED FOR ALL COURT FORMS AND PROCEEDINGS IN THIS CASE):

“THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR OFFICIAL SYMBOL AS FOLLOW(USED FOR ALL COURT FORMS AND PROCEEDINGS IN THIS CASE):

“COMMON LAW” REPLACEMENT FOR INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT SYMBOL AND OFFICIAL STAMP OF “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND RELATOR FOR ALL OFFICIAL COURT FORMS, JUDGMENTS ETC.

THIS WEBPAGE SERVES AS A “COMMON LAW” COURT PROCEEDING PURSUANT TO MY RIGHT VIA ADMIRALTY AND/OR MARITIME LAW!!

THE RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATION ACT(RICO)

ORGANIZED CRIME IN THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT(U.S. OFFICIALS COMMITTING TREASON & ACTING IN JOINT PARTICIPATION WITH ONE OR MORE CHINA, RUSSIA, COMMITTING , HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS, GENOCIDE, WIRE FRAUD, MAIL FRAUD AND A HOST OF OTHER CRIMINAL ACTS AGAINST THE TWO WITNESSES TO DEFRAUD AND TO DEFRAUD THE U.S.A. IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 371)

Was passed in 1970, a federal law designed to combat organized crime in the United States, and allows It allows any person who was injured, sustains reasonably foreseeable injury to his person, business or property by a pattern of racketeering activity to file an action and/or act as Prosecutors.

“THE 50 UNITED STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR” IS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTIVE FOR THE 50 STATES AND/OR THE PEOPLE OF THE 50 STATE SEE “THE ENTIRE WEBSITE FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT, AUTHORITY ETC.”

The statue turn private attorney generals(Sharon Bridgewater and/or James S. Bridgewater two witnesses injured and damaged in business, person or property by a “international public/private” partnership and restrained from interstate and/or foreign commerce) into prosecutors dedicated in illuminating racketeering activity. (b)The Attorney General may institute proceedings under this section. Pending final determination thereof, the court may at any time enter such restraining orders or prohibitions, or take such other actions, including the acceptance of satisfactory performance bonds, as it shall deem proper.

Any person injured in his business or property by reason of a violation of section 1962 of this chapter may sue therefor in any appropriate United States district court and shall recover threefold the damages he sustains and the cost of the suit, including a reasonable attorney’s fee, except that no person may rely upon any conduct that would have been actionable as fraud in the purchase or sale of securities to establish a violation of section 1962 also, RICO permits a private attorney general(In this case “The 50 United States ex rel Sharon Bridgewater Private Attorney General and/or Relator)prevent and restrain violations of section 1962 of this chapter by issuing appropriate orders, including, but not limited to: ordering any person to divest himself of any interest, direct or indirect, in any enterprise; imposing reasonable restrictions on the future activities or investments of any person, including, but not limited to, prohibiting any person from engaging in the same type of endeavor as the enterprise engaged in, the activities of which affect interstate or foreign commerce; or ordering dissolution or reorganization of any enterprise, making due provision for the rights of innocent persons.

IN ADDITION TO THE ABOVE ADMIRALTY AND/OR MARITIME LAW

THE PLENARY POWER OVER THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT(FOR BIDEN, TRUMP AND/OR HARRIS ET AL ACTS OR OMISSION FAILURE TO PROTECT BORDERS, TREASON, ETC.) FOR NATIONAL SECURITY OF THE THE COUNTRY OF AMERICA

COMMON LAW PROVIDES THAT “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR OR ANY AUTHORIZED PERSON APPOINTED BY “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL” AND INVOKE MY COMMON LAW RIGHT AND/OR POWER PURUSANT TO 28 U.S. Code § 566 – Powers and duties of the U.S. MARSHALL(AND/OR APPOINT AUTHORIZED INDIVIDUALS AND/ORG U.S. CITIZENS)to execute, and enforce all orders of this common law court as provided by Admiralty and/or Maritime common law “remedies.” To execute all lawful writs, process, and orders issued under the authority of “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR (AND COMMAND ALL NECESSARY ASSISTANCE TO EXECUTE MY DUTIES AS PROSECUTOR) the United States, and shall command all necessary assistance to execute its duties.

THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT WAIVES IMMUNITY AND CONSENT TO BE SUE VIA “BREACH OF CONTRACTS” IN ADMIRALTY AND/OR MARITIME LAW(AS IN THE CASE ENTITLED SHARON BRIDGEWATER VS. HAYES VALLEY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP – A PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP -BREACH OF CONTRACT, GROSS NEGLIENCE AND FRAUD – SEE BELOW) – CLICK HERE-

THE SUPREMACY OF ADMIRALTY OVER THE COMMON LAW!!

ADMIRALTY AND COMMON LAW(COMMON LAW RIGHTS ARE INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS THAT COME FROM THIS “JUDGE-MADE” LAW AND ARE NOT FORMALLY PASSED BY THE LEGISLATURE-AS IN THE CASE WITH ONE OR MORE SHARON BRIDGEWATER, JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER AND/OR “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR RIGHTS!) IS SUPREME IN MARITIME MATTERS, PRAECIPE, NOTICE & AFFIDIVANT, COMMON LAW REMEDIES OF COMMON LAW COURT ROOM, COMMON LAW MAGISTRATE JUDGE COMMON LAW JURY FOR CRIMINAL TRIAL OTHERWISE KNOWN AS “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR” JUDGE, JURY AND EXECUTOR!! ARTICLE III, SECTION 2, PROVIDES THAT “THE JUDICIAL POWER”(OF THE UNITED STATES) SHALL EXTEND TO ALL CASES OF ADMIRATY AND MARTIME JURSIDICTION. THE PLENARY POWER

MARITIME LAW COURT AND/OR COMMON LAW COURT ARE CONDUCTED WITHOUT ANY JURY!!

“PEOPLE OF THE 50 STATES”) COMMON LAW POWER AND PROVIDE TO THE PEOPLE OF THE 50 STATES THIS COMMON LAW COURT VIA ONE OR MORE PUBLIC LIBRARY, THIS WEBSITE AND/OR OTHER COMMON LAW MEANS!!

ADDITIONAL LAW

INTERNATIONAL LAW!!

THE NUREMBERG CODE REQUIRES FOR PERMISSIBLE MEDICAL EXPERIMENTS THAT:

The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.
The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society,
unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in
nature.
The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal
experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem
under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.
The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental
suffering and injury.
No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that
death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the
experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian
importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the
experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.
The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest
degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those
who conduct or engage in the experiment.
During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the
experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation
of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
10.During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate
the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the
good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him that a continuation of the
experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
INTERNATIONAL LAW RECOGNIZED IN THE CHARTER OF THE NUREMBERG TRIBUNAL AND IN THE JUDGMENT OF THE TRIBUNAL TO THE NEWLY ESTABLISHED INTERNATION LAW COMMMISSION(ILC) –PRINCIPLE I . ANY PERSON WHO COMMITS AN ACT WHICH CONSTITUTE A CRIME UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW IS RESPONSIBLE THERFOR AND LIABLE TO PUNISHMENT . PRINCIPLE II. THE FACT THAT INTERNATIONL LAW DOES OT IMPOSE A PENALTY FOR AN ACT WHICH CONTITUTES A CRIME UNDER INTERNATONAL ALAW DOES NOT RELIEVE THE PERSON WHO COMMITTED THE ACT FROM RESPONSIBLEILIYT UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW. PRINCIPLE III. THE FACT THAT A PERSON WHO COMMITTED AN ACT WHICH CONSTITUTES A CRIME UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW ACTED AS HEAD OF STATE OR RESPONSIBLE GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL DOES OT RELIVE HIM FROM RESPONSIBLITY UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW. PRINCIPLE IV. THE FACT THAT A PERSON ACTED PURSUANT TO ORDER OF HIS GOVERNMENT AND/OR A SUPERIOR DOES NOT RELIEVE HIM FROM REPSONSIBLITY UNDER INTENATIONAL LAW, PROVIDED A MORAL CHOICE WAS IN FACT POSSIBLE TO HIM. PRINCIPLE V. ANY PERSON CHARGED WITH A CRIME UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW HAS THE RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL ON THE FACTS AND LAW. PRINCIPLE VI. THE CRIMES HEREINAFTER SET OT ARE PUNISHABLE AS CRIMES UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW. PRINCIPLE VI. THE CRIMES(VIOLATIONS OF THE NUREMBERG) ARE PUNISHABLE AS CRIMES UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW. A)CRIMES AGINST PEACE: (I) PLANNING, PREPARATION, INITION OR WAGING OF A WAR OF AGGRESSION OR A WAR IN VIOLATION OF INTERNATIONAL TREATIES AND/OR AGREEMENTS OR ASSURANCE; (II)PARTICIPATION IN A COMMON PLAN OR CONSPIRACY FOR ACCOMPLISHMENT OF ANY OF THE ACTS MENTIONED UNDER (I) B)WAR CRIMES: VIOLATION OF THE LAWS OR CUSTOMS OF WAR WHICH INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO, MURDER, ILL TREATMENT OR DEPORTATION TO SLAVE LABOUR OR FOR ANY OTHE RPRPOSE OF CIVILIAN POPULATION OF OR IN OCCUPIED TERRITORY MURDER OR ILL-TREATMENT OF PRISONERS OF WAR OR PERSONS ON THE SEAS, KILLING HOSTAGES, PLUNDER OF PUBLIC OR PRIVATE PROPERTY, WANTON DESTRUCTION OF CITIES, TOWNS, OR VILLAGES OR DEVASTATION NOT JUSTIFIED BY MILITARY NECESSITY. (C) CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY; MURDER, EXTERMINATION, ENSLAVEMENT, DEPORTATION AND OTHER INHUMAN ACTS DONE AGAINST ANY CIVILIAN POPULATION OR PERSECTUTION ON POLITICAL, RACIAL OR RELIGIOUS GROUNDS, WHEN SUCH ACTS ARE DONE OR SUCH PERSECTION ARE CARRIED OUT IN EXECUTION OF OR IN CONNEXION WITH ANY CRIME AGAINST PEACE OR ANY WAR CRIME. PRINCIPLE VII, COMPLICITIY IN THE COMMISION OF A CRIME AGAINST PEACE, A WAR CRIME, OR CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY AS SET FORTH IN PRINCIPLE VI IS A CRIME UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW.

INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION

ADDITIONAL U.S. LAW!!

The Espionage Act was first enacted by Congress in 1917 shortly after the United States entered World War I. Under the law, individuals are prohibited from obtaining “any information related to the national defense with intent or reason to believe that the information may be used for the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation,”

The law also applies to the improper handling of sensitive information related to national security.

12 U.S.C. § 95 and 50 U.S.C. § 4301

“Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.”(SEE BELOW DONALD TRUMP Mar-a-Lago residence in Florida)

Federal law prohibits inciting a riot. Under 18 U.S.C. §2101, anyone who uses interstate travel to organize, promote, encourage, participate in, or carry on a riot; or commit any act of violence in furtherance of a riot; or aid or abet any person doing the above, is guilty of a federal crime.

18 U.S. Code § 2383 – Rebellion or insurrection

Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

Fourteenth Amendment, Section 3:

“No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof.”

What does the Constitution say about insurrection?

Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment prohibits anyone who has previously taken an oath of office (Senators, Representatives, and other public officials) from holding public office if they have “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” against the United States. This means, at least theoretically, that politicians who participate in or encourage a rebellion against the government can not only be removed from office but prevented from holding state and federal offices in the future. However, how disqualification works under the 14th Amendment has never been clear.

Could the disqualification clause prevent Donald Trump from running for president in 2024?

Theoretically, yes. Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment gives Congress the power to disqualify someone who has already held a public office from holding “any office” if they participate in an “insurrection or rebellion” against the United States.

Is disqualification different than impeachment?

Yes. Someone who is impeached could be disqualified from holding public office in the future if they are convicted, and Congress applies such a punishment. But this is separate from disqualification under the 14th Amendment. Under Sections 3 and 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment, Congress could bar someone from holding office. But unlike an impeachment conviction, that decision could be overturned by the courts. Most importantly, under the 14th Amendment, disqualification requires only a simple majority vote, not the two-thirds vote needed to convict during an impeachment trial.

18 U.S. Code § 241 – Conspiracy against rights

18 U.S. Code § 242 – Deprivation of rights under color of law

NO STATUE OF LIMITATIONS FOR THESE CRIMES

nostatue-of-limitationforcrimes-1 Download

FEDERAL CAPITAL OFFENSES PUNISHABLE BY DEATH!

The US federal government lists 41 capital offenses that are punishable by death. See the full list below.

The capital offenses include espionage, treason, and death resulting from aircraft hijacking. However, they mostly consist of various forms of murder such as murder committed during a drug-related drive-by shooting, murder during a kidnapping, murder for hire, and genocide.

According to the Death Penalty Information Center, “The federal death penalty applies in all 50 states and U.S. territories but is used relatively rarely. About 50 prisoners are on the federal death row, most of whom are imprisoned in Terre Haute, Indiana. Sixteen federal executions have been carried out in the modern era, all by lethal injection, with 13 occurring in a six-month period between July 2020 and January 2021… The use of the federal death penalty in jurisdictions that have themselves opted not to have capital punishment—such as Washington, D.C., Puerto Rico, and many states—has raised particular concerns about federal overreach into state matters.”

	Code	Type of Crime
1.	8 USC § 1324	Murder related to the smuggling of aliens
2.	18 USC § 32-34	Destruction of aircraft, motor vehicles, or related facilities resulting in death
3.	18 USC § 36	Murder committed during a drug-related drive-by shooting
4.	18 USC § 37	Murder committed at an airport serving international civil aviation
5.	18 USC § 115 [by cross-reference to 18 USC § 1111]	Retaliatory murder of a member of the immediate family of law enforcement officials
6.	18 USC § 241-247	Civil rights offenses resulting in death
7.	18 USC § 351 [by cross-reference to 18 USC § 1111]	Murder of a member of Congress, an important executive official, or a Supreme Court Justice
8.	18 USC § 794	Espionage
9.	18 USC § 844	Death resulting from offenses involving transportation of explosives, destruction of government property, or destruction of property related to foreign or interstate commerce
10.	18 USC § 924	Murder committed by the use of a firearm during a crime of violence or a drug-trafficking crime
11.	18 USC § 930 [by cross-reference to 18 USC § 1111]	Murder committed in a federal government facility
12.	18 USC § 1091	Genocide
13.	18 USC § 1111	First-degree murder
14.	18 USC § 1114	Murder of a federal judge or law enforcement official
15.	18 USC § 1116	Murder of a foreign official
16.	18 USC § 1118	Murder by a federal prisoner
17.	18 USC § 1119	Murder of a US national in a foreign country
18.	18 USC § 1120	Murder by an escaped federal prisoner already sentenced to life imprisonment
19.	18 USC § 1121 [by cross-reference to 18 U.S.C. § 1111]	Murder of a state or local law enforcement official or other person aiding in a federal investigation; murder of a State correctional officer
20.	18 USC § 1201	Murder during a kidnapping
21.	18 USC § 1203 [by cross-reference to 18 U.S.C. § 1111]	Murder during a hostage taking
22.	18 USC § 1503	Murder of a court officer or juror
23.	18 USC § 1512	Murder with the intent of preventing testimony by a witness, victim, or informant
24.	18 USC § 1513	Retaliatory murder of a witness, victim, or informant
25.	18 USC § 1716	Mailing of injurious articles with intent to kill or resulting in death
26.	18 USC § 1751 [by cross-reference to 18 USC § 1111]	Assassination or kidnapping resulting in the death of the President or Vice President
27.	18 USC § 1958	Murder for hire involving the use of interstate commerce facilities.
28.	18 USC § 1959	Murder involved in a racketeering offense
29.	18 USC § 1992	Willful wrecking of a train resulting in death
30.	18 USC § 2113	Bank-robbery-related murder or kidnapping
31.	18 USC § 2119	Murder related to a carjacking
32.	18 USC § 2245	Murder related to rape or child molestation
33.	18 USC § 2251	Murder related to sexual exploitation of children
34.	18 USC § 2280	Murder committed during an offense against maritime navigation
35.	18 USC § 2281	Murder committed during an offense against a maritime fixed platform
36.	18 USC § 2332 [by cross-reference to 18 U.S.C. § 1111]	Terrorist murder of a US national in another country
37.	18 USC § 2332a	Murder by the use of a weapon of mass destruction
38.	18 U.S.C. § 2332b	Acts of terrorism in the United States resulting in death, committed by a person engaged in conduct that transcends national boundaries.
39.	18 USC § 2340, 2340a	Torture resulting in death committed outside the United States by a U.S. national or by a foreign national present in the US
40.	18 USC § 2381	Treason
41.	21 USC § 848(e) (Anti Drug Abuse Act)	Murder related to a continuing criminal enterprise or related murder of a Federal, State, or local law enforcement officer
42.	49 USC § 46502	Death resulting from aircraft hijacking

NEW METHODS FOR EXECUTION

THE HOMELESSNESS WILL END BY “SWEPT OFF THE STREET WITH THE CHINESE MILITARY BROOM” AND IS THE FIRST TO GO IN THE “GARAGE CAN” HOLOCAUST EXTERMINATION -GAS CHAMBER, FIRING SQUAD, ETC. ALREADY APPROVED IN THE U.S. BY TRUMP AND XI JINPING CONSPIRACY

poison-gas-firing-squads_-us-approves-more-execution-methods-_-death-penalty-news-_-al-jazeera Download

Guarantee Clause Protects Right To Vote Without New Federal Legislation

The Constitution protects the right to vote. Disputes about whether voting in the last election was honest or corrupt are not invitations for states to enact laws suppressing voting. The Constitution prohibits denying or abridging voting rights and requires the United State to guarantee that the Republican Form of Government will be protected in every state. The votes of citizens are essential in the Republic Form of Government.

THE LAW!!