NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW!! SHARON BRIDGEWATER VIA THE “50 STATES” EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR(SEE BELOW FOR LEGAL STANDING AND AUTHORITY) HAVE AUTHORITY, TO ACT AS PRINCIPLE AND TO ACT IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE COUNTRY(THE U.S.A.) AS A WHOLE AND TO ACT AS PRESIDENT OF AND/OR AGENT OF THE PEOPLE OF THE 50 STATES AND INHERENT POWERS(SEE AGENCY LAW BELOW)!!

Agency law is the common law doctrine controlling relationships between agents and principals. A principal-agent relationship is created when the agent is given authority to act for the principal.(IN THIS CASE ALL U.S. PUBLIC OFFICIALS HAVE BEEN RETROACTIVELY FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU PRESENT VIA CONTINUING CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD THE U.S.A. AND BOTH SHARON AND JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER, AND ADJUDICATED GUILTY OF COMMITTING TERRORIST ACTS ON U.S. CITIZENS, TREASON, GENOCIDE, WAR CRIMES, REBELLION AND INSURRECTION, CONDUCTING ILLEGAL UNAUTHORIZED EXPERIMENTS ON U.S. CITIZENS, AND A HOST OF OTHER HENIOUS FELONIOUS CRIMES)

Agency law is the  doctrine controlling relationships between agents and principals. A principal-agency common law relationship is created when the agent is given authority to act for the principal. An agreement made by an agent is binding on the principal so long as the agreement was within the authority actually granted to the agent or reasonably perceived by a third party. 

The two forms of actual authority include:

• Express authority: An agent has express authority to take any actions requested by the principle as well as authority to take any actions inherently necessary to accomplish those requests. 
• Implied authority: An agent has implied authority to take any action the principal’s conduct indicates the agent should do. Furthermore, failure by the principal to object to an agent’s prior actions may create implied authority to repeat those actions in the future. An agent does not have implied authority to do anything expressly prohibited by the principal.

THE ABOVE STATEMENT APPLIES TO JOE BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS, MERRICK GARLAND, DONALD TRUMP AND ALL CO-CONSPIRATORS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO FOREIGN OFFICIALS. THE FOLLOWING PRINCIPLES ARE FUNDAMENTAL IN PRESERVING THE RULE OF LAW: ALL PEOPLE ARE RULED BY THE LAW. LAW ENFORCERS, THE GOVERNMENT AND JUDGES MUST ADHERE TO THE LAW(AND WITHOUTOUT BIAS OR PREJUDUDICE).

Agency law is the common law doctrine controlling relationships between agents and principals. A principal-agent relationship is created when the agent is given authority to act for the principal.(IN THIS CASE ALL U.S. PUBLIC OFFICIALS HAVE BEEN RETROACTIVELY FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU PRESENT VIA CONTINUING CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD THE U.S.A. AND BOTH SHARON AND JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER, AND ADJUDICATED GUILTY OF COMMITTING TERRORIST ACTS ON U.S. CITIZENS, TREASON, GENOCIDE, WAR CRIMES, REBELLION AND INSURRECTION, CONDUCTING ILLEGAL UNAUTHORIZED EXPERIMENTS ON U.S. CITIZENS, AND A HOST OF OTHER HENIOUS FELONIOUS CRIMES)

Agency law is the  doctrine controlling relationships between agents and principals. A principal-agency common law relationship is created when the agent is given authority to act for the principal. An agreement made by an agent is binding on the principal so long as the agreement was within the authority actually granted to the agent or reasonably perceived by a third party. 

The two forms of actual authority include:

Implied authority: An agent has implied authority to take any action the principal’s conduct indicates the agent should do. Furthermore, failure by the principal to object to an agent’s prior actions may create implied authority to repeat those actions in the future. An agent does not have implied authority to do anything expressly prohibited by the principal.

Express authority: An agent has express authority to take any actions requested by the principle as well as authority to take any actions inherently necessary to accomplish those requests. 

“PEOPLE OF THE 50 STATES”) COMMON LAW POWER AND PROVIDE TO THE PEOPLE OF THE 50 STATES THIS COMMON LAW COURT VIA ONE OR MORE PUBLIC LIBRARY, THIS WEBSITE AND/OR OTHER COMMON LAW MEANS!!

THE UNITED 50 STATES AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ARE NOT THE SAME IN ONE!! THE UNITED 50 STATES(“THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR”) REPRESENT THE PEOPLE OF THE 50 STATES AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA(PUBLIC OFFICIALS) REPRESENTS THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT!!

THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION IS THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND!! THE SUPREMACY CLAUSE OF THE UNITED STATES PROVIDES THAT COURTS ARE BOUND BY THE CONSTITUTION(THE SUPREME LAW)!!

EVERY U.S. CITIZEN (PEOPLE OF THE 50 STATES) IS GUARANTEED U.S. CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AS DEFINED IN THE U.S. CONSTITUTION; AND HAVE RIGHTS AS DEFINED IN THE UNIVERSAL DECLARATION FOR HUMAN RIGHTS!!

THE RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATION ACT(RICO)

ORGANIZED CRIME IN THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT(U.S. OFFICIALS COMMITTING TREASON & ACTING IN JOINT PARTICIPATION WITH ONE OR MORE CHINA, RUSSIA, COMMITTING , HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS, GENOCIDE, WIRE FRAUD, MAIL FRAUD AND A HOST OF OTHER CRIMINAL ACTS AGAINST THE TWO WITNESSES TO DEFRAUD AND TO DEFRAUD THE U.S.A. IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 371)

Was passed in 1970, a federal law designed to combat organized crime in the United States, and allows It allows any person who was injured, sustains reasonably foreseeable injury to his person, business or property by a pattern of racketeering activity to file an action and/or act as Prosecutors.

PRIVATE PERSON HAVE STANDING AS PROSECUTORS!

ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME LAW PROVIDES COMMON LAW REMEDIES(Congress allowed state courts to exercise concurrent jurisdiction over admiralty cases in which plaintiffs seek traditional common law remedies)- AND ADJUDICATION OF IN PERSONAM ADMIRALTY AND/OR MARITIME

CAUSE OF ACTION AGAINST ONE OR MORE HARRIS & MERRICK GARLAND[AND HIS PREDECESSOR(“CRIMINAL CLASS REPRESENTATIVES”) FOR THEIR “CRIMINAL ACTS AND CONSPIRACY TO ENGAGE IN A PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY VIA ACTS OR OMISSIONS AGAINST BRIDGEWATER BUSINESS, PERSON OR PROPERTY (SEE BELOW FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT)

(“maritime” referred to the cases arising upon the high seas, whereas “admiralty” meant primarily cases of a local nature involving police regulations common law courts “of all civil causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, including all seizures under laws of impost, navigation or trade of the United States, where the seizures are made, on waters which are navigable from the sea by vessels saving to suitors, in all cases, the right of a common law remedy, where the common law is competent to give it . . .) .”⁹0Savings to Suitors Clause provides jurisdiction to state courts in cases that usually involve minor personal injury that could be resolved by common law.(AS IN THE CASE WITH SAN FRANCISCO SUPERIOR COURT CASE ENTITLED SHARON BRIDGEWATER VS. HAYES VALLEY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP – DEPRIVATION OF ACCESS TO COURTS AND/OR RIGHT TO FILE A FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT IN ALL U.S. FEDERAL COURTS, THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN A SCHEME TO DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES -“BY OPERATION OF LAW AND/OR PURSUANT TO COMMON LAW REMEDIES THE COMPLAINT FILED IN THE SUPERIOR COURT(STATE COURT)OF SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA IS “VALID”!!

THE PLAINTIFF AND/OR CLAIMANT -“THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR(AND/OR SHARON BRIDGEWATER AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER) SEEK COMMON LAW REMEDIES(CONTINUE READING – ALSO PROVIDES THAT GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL ARE NOT IMMUNE FROM SUIT – SEE WEBSITE) !!

This admiralty and/or maritime claim “open court proceeding” have Common law jurisdiction for deprivation and denial of court access via 42 plus dismissed complaint of valid claims(judicial racketeering- see below related cases) of the two witnesses right to file a first amended complaint[pursuant to a Superior Court Judge Order see below (pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure every Plaintiff is allowed to file a first amended complaint “by right” without leave of the court –  plaintiff to amend their complaint one time within 21 days of serving the original complaint or at any point before the defendant answers – Rule 15 provides that the court should allow the plaintiff to amend the complaint when justice requires it)from August 4, 2008 and continuing thru present provides and this admiralty and/or maritime claim by operation of law the “consolidated complaint in intervention” acts as an “first amended complaint.” Congress allowed state courts to exercise concurrent jurisdiction over admiralty cases in which plaintiffs seek traditional common law remedies.

THE PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY

scanned-image_05-31-2022-120437Download

scanned-image_05-31-2022-185335Download

dismissal of all valid clurts in admiralty is therefore an amalgam of the general maritime law insofar as it is acceptable to the courts, modifications of that law by congressional amendment, the common law of torts and contracts as modified to the extent constitutionally possible by state legislation, and international prize law. This body of law is at all times subject to modification by the paramount authority of Congress acting in pursuance of its powers under the Admiralty and Maritime Clause and the Necessary and Proper Clause and, no doubt, the Commerce Clause, now that the Court’s interpretation of that clause has become so expansive. Of this power there has been uniform agreement among the Justices of the Court.

COMMON LAW REMEDIES ALLOWS “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR TO REPLACE AND USE A “COURT MADE STAMP” TO REPLACE ALL U.S. COURT DOCUMENTS AND/OR ACT AS A SYMBOL TO “OFFICIATE, APPROVE AND/OR ACT AS A SIGNET FOR ALL COURT DOCUMENTS ENTITLED “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR”

“THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR OFFICIAL SYMBOL AS FOLLOW(USED FOR ALL COURT FORMS AND PROCEEDINGS IN THIS CASE):

“THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR OFFICIAL SYMBOL AS FOLLOW(USED FOR ALL COURT FORMS AND PROCEEDINGS IN THIS CASE):

THIS WEBPAGE SERVES AS A “COMMON LAW” COURT PROCEEDING PURSUANT TO MY RIGHT VIA COMMON LAW AND THE RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATION ACT AND FOR DEPRIVATION OF COURT ACCESS AND SCHEME TO DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES.

THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT WAIVES IMMUNITY AND CONSENT TO BE SUE VIA “BREACH OF CONTRACTS” IN ADMIRALTY AND/OR MARITIME LAW(AS IN THE CASE ENTITLED SHARON BRIDGEWATER VS. HAYES VALLEY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP – A PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP -BREACH OF CONTRACT, GROSS NEGLIENCE AND FRAUD – SEE THIS WEBSITE) – CLICK HERE-

THE SUPREMACY OF ADMIRALTY OVER THE COMMON LAW!!

ADMIRALTY AND COMMON LAW(COMMON LAW RIGHTS ARE INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS THAT COME FROM THIS “JUDGE-MADE” LAW AND ARE NOT FORMALLY PASSED BY THE LEGISLATURE-AS IN THE CASE WITH ONE OR MORE SHARON BRIDGEWATER, JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER AND/OR “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR RIGHTS!) IS SUPREME IN MARITIME MATTERS, PRAECIPE, NOTICE & AFFIDIVANT, COMMON LAW REMEDIES OF COMMON LAW COURT ROOM,  COMMON LAW MAGISTRATE JUDGE COMMON LAW JURY FOR CRIMINAL TRIAL OTHERWISE  KNOWN AS “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR” JUDGE, JURY AND EXECUTOR!! ARTICLE III, SECTION 2, PROVIDES THAT “THE JUDICIAL POWER”(OF THE UNITED STATES) SHALL EXTEND TO ALL CASES OF ADMIRATY AND MARTIME JURSIDICTION. THE PLENARY POWER

MARITIME LAW COURT AND/OR COMMON LAW COURT ARE CONDUCTED WITHOUT ANY JURY!!

 

IN ADDITION TO THE ABOVE ADMIRALTY AND/OR MARITIME LAW

THE PLENARY POWER OVER THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT(FOR BIDEN, TRUMP AND/OR HARRIS ET AL ACTS OR OMISSION FAILURE TO PROTECT BORDERS, TREASON, ETC.) FOR NATIONAL SECURITY OF THE THE COUNTRY OF AMERICA

COMMON LAW PROVIDES THAT “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR OR ANY AUTHORIZED PERSON APPOINTED BY “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL” AND INVOKE MY COMMON LAW RIGHT AND/OR POWER PURUSANT TO 28 U.S. Code § 566 – Powers and duties of the U.S. MARSHALL(AND/OR APPOINT AUTHORIZED INDIVIDUALS AND/ORG U.S. CITIZENS)to execute, and enforce all orders of this common law court as provided by Admiralty and/or Maritime common law “remedies.” To execute all lawful writs, process, and orders issued under the authority of “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR (AND COMMAND ALL NECESSARY ASSISTANCE TO EXECUTE MY DUTIES AS PROSECUTOR) the United States, and shall command all necessary assistance to execute its duties.

NO STATUE OF LIMITATIONS FOR THESE CRIMES

FEDERAL CAPITAL OFFENSES PUNISHABLE BY DEATH!

The US federal government lists 41 capital offenses that are punishable by death. See the full list below.

The capital offenses include espionage, treason, and death resulting from aircraft hijacking. However, they mostly consist of various forms of murder such as murder committed during a drug-related drive-by shooting, murder during a kidnapping, murder for hire, and genocide.

According to the Death Penalty Information Center, “The federal death penalty applies in all 50 states and U.S. territories but is used relatively rarely. About 50 prisoners are on the federal death row, most of whom are imprisoned in Terre Haute, Indiana. Sixteen federal executions have been carried out in the modern era, all by lethal injection, with 13 occurring in a six-month period between July 2020 and January 2021… The use of the federal death penalty in jurisdictions that have themselves opted not to have capital punishment—such as Washington, D.C., Puerto Rico, and many states—has raised particular concerns about federal overreach into state matters.”

	Code	Type of Crime
1.	8 USC § 1324	Murder related to the smuggling of aliens
2.	18 USC § 32-34	Destruction of aircraft, motor vehicles, or related facilities resulting in death
3.	18 USC § 36	Murder committed during a drug-related drive-by shooting
4.	18 USC § 37	Murder committed at an airport serving international civil aviation
5.	18 USC § 115 [by cross-reference to 18 USC § 1111]	Retaliatory murder of a member of the immediate family of law enforcement officials
6.	18 USC § 241-247	Civil rights offenses resulting in death
7.	18 USC § 351 [by cross-reference to 18 USC § 1111]	Murder of a member of Congress, an important executive official, or a Supreme Court Justice
8.	18 USC § 794	Espionage
9.	18 USC § 844	Death resulting from offenses involving transportation of explosives, destruction of government property, or destruction of property related to foreign or interstate commerce
10.	18 USC § 924	Murder committed by the use of a firearm during a crime of violence or a drug-trafficking crime
11.	18 USC § 930 [by cross-reference to 18 USC § 1111]	Murder committed in a federal government facility
12.	18 USC § 1091	Genocide
13.	18 USC § 1111	First-degree murder
14.	18 USC § 1114	Murder of a federal judge or law enforcement official
15.	18 USC § 1116	Murder of a foreign official
16.	18 USC § 1118	Murder by a federal prisoner
17.	18 USC § 1119	Murder of a US national in a foreign country
18.	18 USC § 1120	Murder by an escaped federal prisoner already sentenced to life imprisonment
19.	18 USC § 1121 [by cross-reference to 18 U.S.C. § 1111]	Murder of a state or local law enforcement official or other person aiding in a federal investigation; murder of a State correctional officer
20.	18 USC § 1201	Murder during a kidnapping
21.	18 USC § 1203 [by cross-reference to 18 U.S.C. § 1111]	Murder during a hostage taking
22.	18 USC § 1503	Murder of a court officer or juror
23.	18 USC § 1512	Murder with the intent of preventing testimony by a witness, victim, or informant
24.	18 USC § 1513	Retaliatory murder of a witness, victim, or informant
25.	18 USC § 1716	Mailing of injurious articles with intent to kill or resulting in death
26.	18 USC § 1751 [by cross-reference to 18 USC § 1111]	Assassination or kidnapping resulting in the death of the President or Vice President
27.	18 USC § 1958	Murder for hire involving the use of interstate commerce facilities.
28.	18 USC § 1959	Murder involved in a racketeering offense
29.	18 USC § 1992	Willful wrecking of a train resulting in death
30.	18 USC § 2113	Bank-robbery-related murder or kidnapping
31.	18 USC § 2119	Murder related to a carjacking
32.	18 USC § 2245	Murder related to rape or child molestation
33.	18 USC § 2251	Murder related to sexual exploitation of children
34.	18 USC § 2280	Murder committed during an offense against maritime navigation
35.	18 USC § 2281	Murder committed during an offense against a maritime fixed platform
36.	18 USC § 2332 [by cross-reference to 18 U.S.C. § 1111]	Terrorist murder of a US national in another country
37.	18 USC § 2332a	Murder by the use of a weapon of mass destruction
38.	18 U.S.C. § 2332b	Acts of terrorism in the United States resulting in death, committed by a person engaged in conduct that transcends national boundaries.
39.	18 USC § 2340, 2340a	Torture resulting in death committed outside the United States by a U.S. national or by a foreign national present in the US
40.	18 USC § 2381	Treason
41.	21 USC § 848(e) (Anti Drug Abuse Act)	Murder related to a continuing criminal enterprise or related murder of a Federal, State, or local law enforcement officer
42.	49 USC § 46502	Death resulting from aircraft hijacking

NEW METHODS FOR EXECUTION

EXTERMINATION -GAS CHAMBER, FIRING SQUAD, ETC.

Guarantee Clause Protects Right To Vote Without New Federal Legislation

The Constitution protects the right to vote. Disputes about whether voting in the last election was honest or corrupt are not invitations for states to enact laws suppressing voting. The Constitution prohibits denying or abridging voting rights and requires the United State to guarantee that the Republican Form of Government will be protected in every state. The votes of citizens are essential in the Republic Form of Government.  

Share this:

• Twitter
• Facebook

_________________________