BREACH OF MULTIPLE “TRANSNATIONAL/INTERNATIONAL” ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME CONTRACTS AND TREATIES – PLURAL!!

The Oath of office is a quid pro quo contract cf [U.S. Const. Art. 6, Clauses 2 and 3, Davis Vs. Lawyers Surety Corporation., 459 S.W. 2nd. 655, 657., Tex. Civ. App.] in which clerks, officials, or officers of the government pledge to perform (Support and uphold the United States and state Constitutions) in return for substance (wages, perks, benefits). Proponents are subjected to the penalties and remedies for Breach of Contract, Conspiracy cf [Title 18 U.S.C., Sections 241, 242]. Treason under the Constitution at Article 3, Section 3., and Intrinsic Fraud cf [Auerbach v Samuels, 10 Utah 2nd. 152, 349 P. 2nd. 1112,1114. Alleghany Corp v Kirby., D.C.N.Y. 218 F. Supp. 164, 183., and Keeton Packing Co. v State., 437 S.W. 20, 28].

PLAINTIFF AND/OR CLAIMANT INCORPORATE AFFIDIVANT AS FULLY SET FOR HEREIN

ON OR ABOUT 1993 AND CONTINUNING THRU TO 2008 AND CONTINUING THRU PRESENT HARRIS ET AL KNOWINGLY, INTENTIONALLY, WILLFULLY, VIOLATED BOTH SHARON AND JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER U.S. CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT AND HUMAN RIGHTS(18 U.S.C. SECTION 241, AND 242, ALL ENTERED INTO A CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD THE U.S.A. FAILED Support and uphold the United States and state Constitution VIOLATED THEIR OATH OF OFFICE

All reactions:

2

SHARON AND JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER HAYES VALLEY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP(PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP) “LEGALLY” BINDING AGREEMENT

1. At all times mentioned on or about Jan. 1, 1993 and continuing thru Jan. 1, 2005 and continuing thru to present both Hayes Valley There was a valid contract;
2. You performed your part of the contract;
3. The defendant failed to perform their part of the contract; and
4. You sustained damages caused by the defendant’s breach.

SHARON AND JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER

CONTRACT #1

VIOLATIONS OF OATH OF OFFICE,

VI

SHARON & JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER LEGALLY BINDING CONTRACT WITH HAYES VALLEY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

INTERNATIONAL CONTRACTS

AMEND THIS PAGE TO INCLUDE INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS, ETC.

THE Fiduciary Obligations of Public Officials

https://commons.stmarytx.edu/lmej/vol9/iss2/4/

At various levels of government, the conduct of public officials is often regulated by ethical standards laid down by legislative enactments, such as federal or state statutes or municipal ordinances. These rules of government ethics are important landmarks in the field of law that defines the legal and ethical obligations of public officials. Such provisions can form the basis for the kinds of government ethics training that helps to minimize wrongful conduct by public servants and reduces the risk that the performance of official duties will be clouded by appearances of impropriety. Codified government ethics rules also frequently provide mechanisms for the investigation of charges of misconduct, and for the enforcement of ethical standards through criminal penalties and other sanctions. However, codified government ethics rules vary widely in quality and scope. Such provisions are often incomplete, poorly drafted, and weakened by legislative compromises made during the adoption process.

This article argues that, notwithstanding the proliferation and usefulness of government ethics codes, common law fiduciary-duty principles continue to play an important role in shaping the law of government ethics. Regardless of whether specific rules of government ethics have been adopted, public officials have a broad fiduciary duty to carry out their responsibilities in a manner that is faithful to the public trust that has been reposed in them. The duties of public officials may extend beyond minimal compliance with codified ethics rules. Even if no ethics code has been adopted, or if no code provision is on point, public officials must act in a manner that comports with their common law fiduciary‑duty obligations. Government ethics laws, criminal provisions, and other legislative enactments should be interpreted and applied in light of the demanding loyalty obligations that are imposed on public officials as fiduciaries.

STATE CONTRACTS HERE

INTERNATIONAL TREATIES AND CONTRACTS HERE

LEGALLY BINDING AGREEMENTS/CONTRACTS/TREATIES (Signatories) WITH BOTH SHARON AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER AND/OR THE “50 STATES” EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR QUI TAM RELATOR (PARTIES TO INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENT – THE SIGNATURES TO CONTRACT ARE INCLUDED) -SEE BREACH OF CONTRACT(ALL HEADS OF STATE HAD AND EXPRESSED AND/OR IMPLIED AGREEMENT WITH BOTH SHARON AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER AND/OR THE U.S.A.!!

Biological Weapons Convention

Biological Weapons Convention (BWC), international treaty that bans the use of biological weapons in war and prohibits all development, production, acquisition, stockpiling, or transfer of such weapons.

OATH OF OFFICE

HAYES VALLEY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

FOREIGN OFFICIALS “HEADS OF STATES”

KAMALA HARRIS IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA(and/or U.S. President(s) possess wide discretion in deciding how and even when to enforce laws, and/or who to prosecute. Kamala Harris President Donald Trump was inaugurated on January 20, 2017,  and before taking office he oath of office, palmed his hand on the Holy Bible and stated, “I, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which “she”  and  added, “So help me God!” Article. II. – The Executive Branch Section 1.   KAMALA HARRIS(one or more Biden, Trump et al) have legal duties and/or obligations to “take care that the laws be faithfully executed,” as defined in Article II, Section 1, Clause 8 Article II of the Constitution.  Kamala Harris(one or more Biden, Donald Trump)”is found”, “in possession” or “in charge” of the entire United Sates and the “State of Affairs” of the United States of America with legal duties and obligations and responsibilities as the United States President. Donald Trump is the Commander in-Chief of the armed forces etc. and a State Actor acting under the color of State and/or Federal law with legal duties and obligation to uphold the United States Constitution with KAMALA HARRIS(AND ONE OR MORE BIDEN & TRUMP ET AL) Kamala Harris Trump owed of care to Sharon Bridgewater and/or James S. Bridgewater.  On or about January 20, 2017, and continuing thru present Trump et al and Bridgewater at all times mentioned had a continues to have a “fiduciary relationship-public official/citizen relationship.”  Trump at all times mentioned have legal duties and obligation to exercise discretion in creating laws that will impact the Plaintiff Bridgewater and/or other lives.  Trump position as United States President is Superior to citizens of the United States as well as the Plaintiff Bridgewater.    He at all times mentioned owe a duty of care to Sharon Bridgewater and/or James S. Bridgewater  a duty of loyalty, a duty of impartiality, accountability and a duty to preserve the public’s trust in the government.  He is further subjected to regulation and/or laws under the United States Bill of Rights, Including the First, second, Fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth, ninth, tenth and Fourteenth Amendments and “all the amendments of the United States Constitution, and further is subjected to International treaties, the Declaration for human rights

BREACH OF CONTRACT #1 – “DEFENDANTS” U.S. PUBLIC OFFICIALS

1. At all times mentioned on or about Jan. 1, 1993 and continuing thru Jan. 1, 2005 and continuing thru to present one or more Defendants, including but not limited to Kamala Harris entered into a legally binding “valid” contract with the United States of America and stated “I, AB, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.” Kamala Harris and one or more Defendants Joe Biden et al and in order to receive benefits from the United States Government and wages, and at all times mentioned there was a valid contract;
2. The United States “50 STATES” performed their part of the contract;
3. Kamala Harris, Joe Biden, et al failed to perform their part of the contract and duties, violated oath of office and
4. The United States – the “50 States” and both Sharon and James S. Bridgewater sustained damages caused by the Kamala, Biden et al defendant’s breach. (SEE INTERVENTION FOR FEDERAL FALSE CLAIMS DAMAGES AMOUNTS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT – ALL PRESIDENTS INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO JOE BIDEN, DONALD TRUMP ET AL) AS FOLLOWS:

SEE INTERVENTION FOR OTHER INTERNATIONAL LEGALLY BINDING AGREEMENTS AND BREACH OF CONTRACT AND/OR LEGALLY BINDING AGREEMENT(S)

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

LEGALLY BINDING AGREEMENTS/CONTRACTS/TREATIES (Signatories) WITH BOTH SHARON AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER AND/OR THE “50 STATES” EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR QUI TAM RELATOR (PARTIES TO INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENT – THE SIGNATURES TO CONTRACT ARE INCLUDED) -SEE BREACH OF CONTRACT(ALL HEADS OF STATE HAD AND EXPRESSED AND/OR IMPLIED AGREEMENT WITH BOTH SHARON AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER AND/OR THE U.S.A.!!

Biological Weapons Convention

Biological Weapons Convention (BWC), international treaty that bans the use of biological weapons in war and prohibits all development, production, acquisition, stockpiling, or transfer of such weapons.

OATH OF OFFICE

HAYES VALLEY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

FOREIGN OFFICIALS “HEADS OF STATES”

KAMALA HARRIS IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA(and/or U.S. President(s) possess wide discretion in deciding how and even when to enforce laws, and/or who to prosecute. Kamala Harris President Donald Trump was inaugurated on January 20, 2017,  and before taking office he oath of office, palmed his hand on the Holy Bible and stated, “I, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which “she”  and  added, “So help me God!” Article. II. – The Executive Branch Section 1.   KAMALA HARRIS(one or more Biden, Trump et al) have legal duties and/or obligations to “take care that the laws be faithfully executed,” as defined in Article II, Section 1, Clause 8 Article II of the Constitution.  Kamala Harris(one or more Biden, Donald Trump)”is found”, “in possession” or “in charge” of the entire United Sates and the “State of Affairs” of the United States of America with legal duties and obligations and responsibilities as the United States President. Donald Trump is the Commander in-Chief of the armed forces etc. and a State Actor acting under the color of State and/or Federal law with legal duties and obligation to uphold the United States Constitution with KAMALA HARRIS(AND ONE OR MORE BIDEN & TRUMP ET AL) Kamala Harris Trump owed of care to Sharon Bridgewater and/or James S. Bridgewater.  On or about January 20, 2017, and continuing thru present Trump et al and Bridgewater at all times mentioned had a continues to have a “fiduciary relationship-public official/citizen relationship.”  Trump at all times mentioned have legal duties and obligation to exercise discretion in creating laws that will impact the Plaintiff Bridgewater and/or other lives.  Trump position as United States President is Superior to citizens of the United States as well as the Plaintiff Bridgewater.    He at all times mentioned owe a duty of care to Sharon Bridgewater and/or James S. Bridgewater  a duty of loyalty, a duty of impartiality, accountability and a duty to preserve the public’s trust in the government.  He is further subjected to regulation and/or laws under the United States Bill of Rights, Including the First, second, Fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth, ninth, tenth and Fourteenth Amendments and “all the amendments of the United States Constitution, and further is subjected to International treaties, the Declaration for human rights

BREACH OF CONTRACT #1 – “DEFENDANTS” U.S. PUBLIC OFFICIALS

1. At all times mentioned on or about Jan. 1, 1993 and continuing thru Jan. 1, 2005 and continuing thru to present one or more Defendants, including but not limited to Kamala Harris entered into a legally binding “valid” contract with the United States of America and stated “I, AB, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.” Kamala Harris and one or more Defendants Joe Biden et al and in order to receive benefits from the United States Government and wages, and at all times mentioned there was a valid contract;
2. The United States “50 STATES” performed their part of the contract;
3. Kamala Harris, Joe Biden, et al failed to perform their part of the contract and duties, violated oath of office and
4. The United States – the “50 States” and both Sharon and James S. Bridgewater sustained damages caused by the Kamala, Biden et al defendant’s breach. (SEE INTERVENTION FOR FEDERAL FALSE CLAIMS DAMAGES AMOUNTS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT – ALL PRESIDENTS INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO JOE BIDEN, DONALD TRUMP ET AL) AS FOLLOWS:

CLICK HERE FOR BREACH OF LEGALLY BINDING AGREEMENT(S)

SHARON & JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER LEGALLY BINDING CONTRACT WITH HAYES VALLEY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

2 OR MORE PREDICATE ACTS WHICH CONSTITUTE “Pattern of racketeering activity” requires at least two acts of racketeering activity committed within ten years of each other racketeering activity Extended over a substantial period of time(2008 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT) AND posed a threat of continued criminal activity, against Sharon and/or James S. Bridgewater(Two Witnesses) and the United States Government in violation of 18 U.S.C. section 371. EACH AND EVERY COURT FILING AND DISMISSAL OF 42 COMPLAINTS CONSTITUTE JUDICIAL RACKETEERING AND PR(PATTERN OF OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE)