two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or

If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured in violation of 18 U.S.C. section 241 KNOWINGLY, INTENTIONALLY, WILLFULLY CONSPIRED UNDER THE COLOR OF LAW,  WITH JOE BIDEN(TRUMP, K. HARRIS AND PREDESSCORS THRU TO BIDEN’S TERM AND/OR “SUCCESSOR”  INCLUDING AMY BARRET  IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY CONSPIRED UNDER THE COLOR OF FEDERAL AND/OR STATE, ACTED IN THEIR INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY  DISCRIMINATED AGAINST TWO WITNESSES(SHARON AND JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER) BASED ON DISABILITY, SOCIOECONOMIC BACKGROUND, ACTED UNDER THE COLOR OF LAW AND DENY AND/OR DEPRIVE TWO WITNESSES EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAW DENIED AND/OR DEPRIVED THE WITNESSES EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAWS, AND/OR EQUAL PRIVLEDGES

UNDER THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION, VIOLATED

ONE OR MORE TO THE TWO WITNESSESES 1ST, 2ND, 3RD, 4TH, 5TH, 6TH,

​

ON OR ABOUT OBAMA(JOE BIDEN IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS VICE PRESIDENT) AND ERIC HOLDER IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL)KAMALA HARRIS IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SAN FRANCISCO DISTRICT ATTORNEY U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL KNOWINGLY, INTENTIONALLY CAME TO THE MEETING OF THE MIND TO ACT UNDER THE COLOR OF LAW, COMMIT FRAUD ON THE COURT, CONCEAL KNOWN FACTS FROM BRIDGEWATER, THEY WERE UNDER A DUTY TO DISCLOSE, JOIN A LAWSUIT ENTITLED ONE OR MORE BRIDGEWATER VS. OBAMA(AND/OR DONALD TRUMP)

​

OTHER DEFENDANTS AND/OR REPONDENTS

INTRODUCTION

International laws, and treaties, The United States Constitution is the Supreme law of the land, Trump Article II, Section 1, Clause 8 Article II of the Constitution in pertinent part “take care that the laws be faithfully executed,”  AKA Queen Elizabeth, Jacob Rothchild, Foreign “Heads of State” Joe Biden, Donald Trump, Jacob Rothchild in his official capacity as President is not is not above the law.  No man is this county(or the World) is so high that he is above the law.  No Officer(in the U.S.A. or Foreign County) of the law may set that law at defiance with impunity.  All the Officers of the government, from the highest to the lowest, are creatures of the law and are bound to obey it.  It is the only supreme over in our system of government, and every man who by accepting Office participates in its functions is only the more strongly bound to submit to that supremacy, and to observe the limitations which it imposes upon the exercise of the authority which it gives.  Unites States v. lee, 106 U.S. 196, 220.  Joe Biden, Donald Trump, Barak H. Obama et al(A.K.A.)U.S.A. public officials” act in joint participation and/or conspire et al cannot enforce “unconstitutional legislation,” in violation of the U.S. Constitution, conspire with the enemy(China, Russia, Iran etc.) to defraud the U.S.A. in violation of 18 U.S.C. incites, sets on foot, assists, or engage in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto to the enemy, Further they can not knowingly, in violation of 18 U.S.C. section 2383 intentionally conceal known facts from humanity they are under a duty to disclose to U.S. Citizens[and human beings](deceive and commit fraud) about the true nature and intent of the “experimental COV-19 injection(A.K.A. COV-19 VACCINE), conspire with Foreign Officials and grant Communist China sovereignty over the United States of America,” based on “experimental COV-19 injection(A.K.A. COV-19 VACCINE)which is responsible for hundreds and thousands of death, and force humanity to take a “injection” that is harmful to the health and safety of human beings in violation the Declaration for Human rights. whic violates the experimental vaccine

EVEN FURTHER, THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION

THAT THAT BIDEN, HARRIS, ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, ALL U.S.REPRESENTATIVES AND/OR CONGRESSMAN, ET AL ARE U.S. PUBLIC OFFICIALS :and as defined as one or more Member of Congress, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner, either before or after such official has qualified, or an officer or employee or person acting for or on behalf of the United States, or any department, agency or branch of Government thereof, including the District of Columbia, in any official function, under or by authority of any such department, agency, or branch of Government, or a juror; and “person(s) who has been selected to be a public official(s),” nominated or appointed to be a public official, or has been officially informed that such person will be so nominated or appointed; and were U.S. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES PERFORMING “official act” by means one or more decision(s), action(s) on one or more question(s), matter(s), cause(s), suit(s), proceeding(s) or controversy(s), which may at any time be pending, or which may by law be brought before any public official, in such official’s official capacity, or in such official’s place of trust or profit. WITH LEGAL DUTIES TO PROTECT THE UNITED STATES FROM ENEMIES, LEGAL DUTIES TO PROTECT THE U.S.A. BORDERS, AND ALL U.S. CITIZENS. ALL HAVE TAKEN OATH OF OFFICE AND HAVE SWORN ON THE HOLY BIBLE TO DEFEND THE U.S.A., and as defined in 5 U.S.C. SECTION 3331 which states, “An individual, except the President, elected or appointed to an office of honor or profit in the civil service or uniformed services, shall take the following oath: “I, AB, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.” THE CITIZENS OF THE U.S.A. AS DEPICTED IN THE FOLLOWING IMAGES:

,   James Comey and/or Jeff Sessions have taken “Oath of Office,” to faithfully execute their legal duties and obligation as public officials.   Further federal law regulation “Oath of Office” by government Officials is divided into four parts along with an “Executive Order” which further defines the law for purposes of enforcement.   The law of 5 USC 3331/[1] provides the text of the actual “Oath of Office” that members of Congress are required to take before assuming Office.  The law of 5 USC 3333/[2] requires members of Congress to sign an Affidavit  that they have taken the “Oath of Office” required by 5 USC 3331 and have not, or will not violate the “Oath of Office” during their Tenure of Office as defined by the third art of the law, 5 USC 7311/[3] which explicitly makes it a federal criminal offense(and a violation of “Oath of Office”) for anyone employed in the United States Government(including members of Congress) to “advocate the overthrow of our constitutional form of government.”/[4]  The fourth Federal Law, 18 USC 1918/[5]  provides penalties for violation of “Oath of Office” described in 5 USC 7311 which include: (1) removal from office and; (2) confinement or a fine.   The definition of “advocate” is further specified in Executive Order 10450/[6]  which purposes of enforcement, supplements 5 USC 7311.   One provision of Executive Order 10450 specifies that it is a violation of 5 USC 7311 for any person taking the “Oath of Office” to advocate “the alteration…of the form of government of the United States by unconstitutional means.”  Our form of government is defined by the Constitution of the United States.  It can only be “altered” by Constitutional Amendments.   Thus, according to Executive Order 10450(and therefore 5 USC 7311) any acts taken by government Officials who have taken the “Oath of Office” prescribed by 5 USC 3331 which alters the form of government other than by Amendment, is a criminal violation of the 5 USC 7311. 

---

[1]              /Employees of the United States Government including all members of Congress are required to take the following “Oath” before assuming elected or appointed Office.

              5 USC 3331: “An individual, shall take the following oath:  “I, AB, do solemnly swear(or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter.  So help me God.”

[2]             

            /5 USC 3333: “…an individual who accepts office or employment in the Government of the United States…shall  execute an affidavit within 60 days after accepting the office or employment that his acceptance and holding of the office or employment does not or will not violate section 7311 of this title.  The affidavit is prima facie evidence that the acceptance and holding of office or employment by the affiant does not or will not violate section 7311 of this title.”

[3]             

            / Federal law specifically prohibits any individual from accepting or holding any position(including elected office) in the United States Government if they advocate the overthrow of our constitutional form of Government.

                              5 USC 7311 (1): “An individual April not accept or hold a position in the Government of the United States of the Government of the District of Columbia if he(1) advocates the overthrow of our constitutional  form of Government……”

[4]             

            Advocate:  To speak in favor of or defend by argument.  To support, vindicate, or recommend publicly.  Black’s Law Dictionary  

[5]              Federal criminal law is explicit and direct regarding a violation of “Oath of Office” by Federal Officials which includes all members of Congress.  The law requires the removal of the Office holder as well a prison term or fine from the Offender.

            18 USC 1918:    “Whoever violates the provisions of section 731 of title 5 that an individual April not accept or hold a position in the Government of the United States or the government of the District of Columbia if he/she (1) advocates the overthrow of our constitutional form of government.”

            Executive Order 10450 states (in part):  “Whereas the interest of national security require that all

            persons privileged  to be employed in…..the Government shall be reliable, trustworthy, of good

                                 conduct and character, and of complete and unswerving loyalty to the United States..it is hereby

                                 ordered as follows:

[6]              In order to instruct investigating “a Federal Grand Jury and/or Special Prosecutor” to what is a violation of “Oath of Office” under 5 USC 3331 and 5 USC 7311, Executive Orer 10450 was issued to serve as a guideline from determining what actions constituted a criminal violation of the “Oath of Office” by Federal Officials.  The “Order” affirms the law of 5 USC 7311 that is a criminal violation under 18 USC 1918 for a member of the government, which includes members of Congress, to “advocate the overthrow of our constitutional form of government.”

    My son have a right to be free and happy and to conduct commerce. I have a right to be free from stalking, harassment, assault, battery, violence, Our US Constitution is precious to all and every US Citizen must protect. The right to be made in the Image of God in heaven THE CREATOR without deceit, fraud and coercion to change my DNA into the image of a “creature” without the right.

ON OR ABOUT JAN. 2005 AND CONTINUING THRU TO 2008 PLAINTIFF AND/OR CLAIMANT INJRED AND HARMED & SEEKING DAMAGES PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, BY RIGHT” IS PERMITTED TO FILE A FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT!!

ALL CAME TO THE MEETING OF THE MIND(ROTHCHILD, OBAMA IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS PRESIDENT, JOE BIDEN IN HIS OFICIAL CPACITY AS VICE PRESIDENT, KAMALA HARRIS IN HER OFFICIAL CAPCITY AS U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

ON OR ABOUT JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESDENT GEORGE H. BUSH, BILL AND HILLARY CLINTON(CLINTON HEALTH CARE REFORM)TO DO A SOCIETAL RESET,

JACOB ROTHCHILD(ONE OR MORE OWNER AND CONTROLLER OF MOST IF NOT ALL CENTRAL – A MAN WHO PUBLICLY ADMITS HE IS A SATANIST, WORSHIP LUCIFER AND/OR SATAN AND HATES ALL MEN AND WOMEN CREATED IN THE IMAGE OF GOD, CLAIMS GOD’S APPLE OF HIS EYE ISRAEL, CAME TO THE MEETING OF MIND WITH GEORGE H. BUSH[FATHER PRESCOT BUSH A SUPPORTER OF ADOLPH HITLER](AND THOSE OPERATING UNDER HIS DIRECTION & SUCCESSORS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO BIDEN TERM TO DISCRIMINATE ABUSE COMMIT FRAUD ON THE COURT, COMMIT CRIMINAL ACTS, WIRE FRAUD, POWER, CLAIM 125 TRILLION, – TO FUND THE COV-19 INJECTION TO COMMIT MASS GENODIEN, SOCIETAL RESET,

C DURING THE GULF WAR TO CONSOLIDATE,

JACOB ROTHCHILD(ONE OR MORE OWNER AND CONTROLLER OF MOST IF NOT ALL CENTRAL – A MAN WHO PUBLICLY ADMITS HE IS A SATANIST, WORSHIP LUCIFER AND/OR SATAN AND HATES ALL MEN AND WOMEN CREATED IN THE IMAGE OF GOD, CLAIMS GOD’S APPLE OF HIS EYE ISRAEL, CAME TO THE MEETING OF MIND WITH GEORGE H. BUSH[FATHER PRESCOT BUSH A SUPPORTER OF ADOLPH HITLER](AND THOSE OPERATING UNDER HIS DIRECTION & SUCCESSORS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO BIDEN TERM TO DISCRIMINATE ABUSE COMMIT FRAUD ON THE COURT, COMMIT CRIMINAL ACTS, WIRE FRAUD, POWER, CLAIM 125 TRILLION, – TO FUND THE COV-19 INJECTION TO COMMIT MASS GENODIEN, SOCIETAL RESET,

_____________________

On or about 1993 and continuing thru present  and a number of times since then, Defendant Class representative Bridgewater has demanded that defendants stop their wrongful conduct described above.  Plaintiff Barak H. Obama, Loretta Lynch(and her predecessor Eric Holder) and each of them, have refused and still refuse to refrain from their wrongful conduct.

Plaintiff  wrongful conduct, unless and until enjoined and restrained by order of this court, will cause great and irreparable injury to plaintiff in that we “the people of the 50 States, will l “United States Government” in that the United States will continue to suffer loses and/or the States will continue to be deprived or denied equal protection of the laws.SIGNED ASAll of United States Supreme
Court Justices Obama and/or Loretta Lynch, Jacob Rothchild, foreign official including Xi Jinping, Vladmir Putin and each of them, wrongfully and unlawfully collect humanity DNA, change every man women and child DNA, advocate to overthrow our constitutional form of Government, commit Treason, jeopardize our national securityobstruct a congressional investigation, disarm U.S. Citizens conceal known facts from the American People and/or Humanity, vaccine  nano chip RFID technology, High Tech companies, surveillance enslave cashless society, cause every man women and child to receive racketeering violation, defraud two witnesses and victims of U.S. to fund the “vaccine globally”

 18 U.S. Code § 1513 – Retaliating against a witness, victim, or an informant

knowingly, intentionally violated 18 U.S.C. CODE SECTION 1513, AND CONSPIRED TO RETALIATE AGAINST THE TWO WITNESS SHARON AND/OR JAMES IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1513 conspired and/or engage in any conduct and thereby causes bodily injury to another person or damages the tangible property of another person, or threatens to do so, with intent to retaliate against any person for—(1)

the attendance of a witness or party at an official proceeding, or any testimony given or any record, document, or other object produced by a witness in an official proceeding; or

(2)

any information relating to the commission or possible commission of a Federal offense or a violation of conditions of probation, supervised release, parole, or release pending judicial proceedings given by a person to a law enforcement officer;

or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.

(c)

If the retaliation occurred because of attendance at or testimony in a criminal case, the maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed for the offense under this section shall be the higher of that otherwise provided by law or the maximum term that could have been imposed for any offense charged in such case.

(d)

There is extraterritorial Federal jurisdiction over(ALL FOREIGN OFFICIALS) an offense under this section.

(e)

Whoever knowingly, with the intent to retaliate, takes any action harmful to any person, including interference with the lawful employment or livelihood of any person, for providing to a law enforcement officer any truthful information relating to the commission or possible commission of any Federal offense,

Section 750.411i

​

​

“Harassment” means conduct directed toward a victim that includes, but is not limited to, repeated or continuing unconsented contact that would cause a reasonable individual to suffer emotional distress and that actually causes the victim to suffer emotional distress. Harassment does not include constitutionally protected activity or conduct that serves a legitimate purpose.

  (e) “Stalking

 (1) As used in this section:

  (a) “Course of conduct” means a pattern of conduct composed of a series of 2 or more separate noncontinuous acts evidencing a continuity of purpose.

  (b) “Credible threat” means a threat to kill another individual or a threat to inflict physical injury upon another individual that is made in any manner or in any context that causes the individual hearing or receiving the threat to reasonably fear for his or her safety or the safety of another individual.

  (c) “Emotional distress” means significant mental suffering or distress that may, but does not necessarily, require medical or other professional treatment or counseling.

  (d) “Harassment” means conduct directed toward a victim that includes, but is not limited to, repeated or continuing unconsented contact that would cause a reasonable individual to suffer emotional distress and that actually causes the victim to suffer emotional distress. Harassment does not include constitutionally protected activity or conduct that serves a legitimate purpose.

  (e) “Stalking” means a willful course of conduct involving repeated or continuing harassment of another individual that would cause a reasonable person to feel terrorized, frightened, intimidated, threatened, harassed, or molested and that actually causes the victim to feel terrorized, frightened, intimidated, threatened, harassed, or molested.

  (f) “Unconsented contact” means any contact with another individual that is initiated or continued without that individual’s consent or in disregard of that individual’s expressed desire that the contact be avoided or discontinued. Unconsented contact includes, but is not limited to, any of the following:

  (i) Following or appearing within the sight of that individual.

  (ii) Approaching or confronting that individual in a public place or on private property.

  (iii) Appearing at that individual’s workplace or residence.

  (iv) Entering onto or remaining on property owned, leased, or occupied by that individual.

  (v) Contacting that individual by telephone.

  (vi) Sending mail or electronic communications to that individual.

knowingly, intentionally devised or intended to devise a scheme to defraud (the two witnesses and victims of Government official acting in their individual capacities, under the color of law engaged in racketeering activity)use of the mail for the purpose of executing, or attempting to execute, the scheme (or specified fraudulent acts)scheme or artifice to deprive another of the intangible right of honest services in violaton of USC section 18 U.S. Code § 1346..or devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, transmits or causes to be transmitted by means of wire, radio, or television communication in interstate or foreign commerce, any writings, signs, signals, pictures, or sounds for the purpose of executing such scheme or artifice, devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, transmits or causes to be transmitted by means of wire, radio, or television communication in interstate or foreign commerce, any writings, signs, signals, pictures, or sounds for the purpose of executing such scheme or artifice, in violation of 18 usc section 1343  (1) a scheme to defraud, and (2) the mailing of a letter, etc., for the purpose of executing the scheme.”)that the defendant voluntarily and intentionally devised or participated in a scheme to defraud another out of money; (2) that the defendant did so with the intent to defraud; (3) that it was reasonably foreseeable that interstate wire communications would be used; and (4) that interstate wire communications were in fact used)I
knowingly and willfully, filed “under seal” 
falsified, concealed, or covered up by trick, scheme, or device a material fact;  made a material false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation about Bridgewater a party not part of that proceeding; or
made or used a false writing or document knowing the same to contain a material false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry; (“exploited Bridgewater’s name-identity theft”) about Bridgewater a party not part of the judicial proceeding in violation of 18 USC section Code section 1001 
conspired with Merrick Garland in his official cacity as U.S. COURT OF PPEA
falsified, concealed, or covered up by trick, scheme, or device a material fact;  made a material false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation about Bridgewater a party not part of that proceeding; or
made or used a false writing or document knowing the same to contain a material false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry; (“exploited Bridgewater’s name-identity theft”)defraud Bridgewater out of $350.00 about Bridgewater a party not part of the   judicial proceeding Bridgewater s. Trump Case Number:19-1141, (see below)via statements, representations, writings or documents submitted TO each other  false court documents which,  lacked jurisdiction of the subject matter, or of the parties, or acted in a manner inconsistent with due process

PETITION FOR WRIT CERTIORARI 

 

KNOWINGLY, INTENTIONALLY CONSPIRED UNDER THE COLOR OF LAW DENY AND/OR DEPRIVE BRIDGEWATER THE RIGHT TO FILE A FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT(BY LAW A PLAINTIFF IS ALLOWED ONE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT), DENY BRIDEWATER COURT ACCESS AND DEFRAUD BRIDGEWATER OUT OF MONEY AND/OR PROPERTY WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW AND “ACT” AS BRIDGEWATER OBTAIN 125 TRILLION TO FUND THE COV-19 INJECTION ON HUMANITY !!

THE PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY

scanned-image_05-31-2022-120437Download

scanned-image_05-31-2022-185335Download

 

​

 

 

IN ADDITION MANY LITIGANTS HAD #1 PROOF THAT OBAMA IS AN ILLEGAL IMMIGRATE!! OBAMA AND ALL JUDGES KNOWINGLY, INTENTIONALLY CONSPIRED WITH U.S. SUPREME COURT JUDGES AND ALL JUDGES TO DISMISS ALL COMPLAINTS WHICH CONTROVERSY WAS AGAINST “ILLEGAL IMMIGATE” AS FOLLOWS(TO FURTHER PROMOTE THE CRIMINAL ENTERPRIZE):

birtherDownload

ON OR ABOUT JAN. 1, 2009 JACOB ROTHCHILD, BARAK H. OBAMA IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS PRESIDENT AND JOE BIDEN IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPCITY AS VICE PRESIDENT( Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) “AMNESTY PROGRAM FOR HUNDRED OF THOUSANDS OF ILLEGAL IMMIGRATES” IS NOW BIDEN AND/OR HARRIS(“OBAMA’S EXTENTION) OPEN BORDER POLICY AS FOLLOWS:

BIDEN PREDECESSCOR(OBAMA HAS BEEN TRAINING CHINESE TRAINING TROOPS ON U.S. SOIL SINCE OR OR ABOUT 2012-2013)

BIDEN AND HIS PREDECESSCOR(OBAMA HAS BEEN TRAINING CHINESE TRAINING TROOPS ON U.S. SOIL SINCE OR OR ABOUT 2012-2013)

PLEASE NOTE THE GOVT. CRIMINAL, TREASONOUS BIOTERRORIST GROUP REMOVED, THE FILE I HAD WHICH STATES THAT OBAMA HAS BEEN TRAINING CHINESE TROOPS ON U.S. SOIL SINCE 2013(THE REASON WHY IT’S TWO OF THE SAME!

government-allows-china-to-train-with-u.s.-military-on-u.s.-soilDownload

chinesetroopsonussoil-2Download

PLEASE NOTE THE GOVT. CRIMINAL, TREASONOUS BIOTERRORIST GROUP REMOVED, THE FILE I HAD WHICH STATES THAT OBAMA HAS BEEN TRAINING CHINESE TROOPS ON U.S. SOIL SINCE 2013(THE REASON WHY IT’S TWO OF THE SAME!

TO FURTHER THE DESTROY AMERICA, ENSLAVE HUMANITY AGENC LEGALL p, DONALD TRUMP IN HI OFFICIAL CPACITY AS REAL ESTATE BUSINSS TYCOON, ONE OR MORE KAMALA HARRIS, HILLARY CLINTOIN, RUSSIA, ET AL DISCRIMINATE AGAINST THE TWO WITNESSES, ADOPTED THE ACTS OF ENSLAVE

ELECTION FRAUD, RFID CHIP, EXPLOIT TWO WITNESSES BOTH SHARON AND JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER TO “FAKE A PANDEMIC, CONCEAL KNOWN FACTS, FUND THE ‘GLOBAL COV-

THE TWO WITNESSES, CHANGE MEN AND WOMEN DNA, 5G

“PLANDEMIC” AND/OR FORCE AND/OR MAKE VACCINE AND/OR RFID CHIPS IMPLANTS MANDATORY ON THE GENERAL POPULACE AS FOLLOWS(AKA KNOWN AS THE COV-19 VACCINE-SEE BELOW)AND QUARANTINE ALL WHO DO NOT GET THE

WHICH CORRELATES WITH “FREE OBAMAPHONES” AND OBAMA HEALTH CARE(COMMENCED UNDER WILLIAM BILL CLINTON AND/OR HILLARY CLINTON IN 1993

THE SAME AS THE AS ALL JUDGES COMMITTED MULTIPLE, MULTIPLE CRIMINAL ACTS AGAINST MY BUSINESS, PERSON OR PROPERTY AND KNOWINGLY, INTENTIONALLY FALSELY IMPRISONMENT(COMMITTED ACTS OF WIRE FRAUD, BANK FRAUD, EXTORTION AND A HOST OF OTHER ACTS AND DISMISSED ALL COMPLAINTS OVER THE COURT OF APPROX. 20 YEARS!!

two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or

If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured in violation of 18 U.S.C. section 241 KNOWINGLY, INTENTIONALLY, WILLFULLY CONSPIRED UNDER THE COLOR OF LAW,  WITH JOE BIDEN(TRUMP, K. HARRIS AND PREDESSCORS THRU TO BIDEN’S TERM AND/OR “SUCCESSOR”  INCLUDING AMY BARRET  IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY CONSPIRED UNDER THE COLOR OF FEDERAL AND/OR STATE, ACTED IN THEIR INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY  DISCRIMINATED AGAINST TWO WITNESSES(SHARON AND JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER) BASED ON DISABILITY, SOCIOECONOMIC BACKGROUND, ACTED UNDER THE COLOR OF LAW AND DENY AND/OR DEPRIVE TWO WITNESSES EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAW DENIED AND/OR DEPRIVED THE WITNESSES EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAWS, AND/OR EQUAL PRIVLEDGES

UNDER THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION, VIOLATED

ONE OR MORE TO THE TWO WITNESSESES 1ST, 2ND, 3RD, 4TH, 5TH, 6TH,

​

ON OR ABOUT OBAMA(JOE BIDEN IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS VICE PRESIDENT) AND ERIC HOLDER IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL)KAMALA HARRIS IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SAN FRANCISCO DISTRICT ATTORNEY U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL KNOWINGLY, INTENTIONALLY CAME TO THE MEETING OF THE MIND TO ACT UNDER THE COLOR OF LAW, COMMIT FRAUD ON THE COURT, CONCEAL KNOWN FACTS FROM BRIDGEWATER, THEY WERE UNDER A DUTY TO DISCLOSE, JOIN A LAWSUIT ENTITLED ONE OR MORE BRIDGEWATER VS. OBAMA(AND/OR DONALD TRUMP)

 

​

 OBAMA AND/OR HOLDER JOINT THE BELOW LAWSUIT – SEE SIX CASE DOWN – ENJOIN FILER REVIEW

​

​

doc062-1Download

doc070-2Download

THE ACTS OR OMISSIONS BY U.S. GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL THAT WERE COMMITTED AGAINST THE TWO WITNESSES IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE DISMISSED CASES ARE ASSAULT AND BATTERY, THEFT, PERJURY, FALSE IMPRISONMENT, FALSE ARREST, FRAUD ON THE COURT, FALSE DECLARATIONS, AND A HOST OF PREDICATE ACTS AS DEFINED IN 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1961(1) WIRE FRAUD, EXTORTION UNDER THE OFFICIAL RIGHT, RETALIATION, MONEY LAUNDERING, BANK FRAUD, ABUSE OF POWER ETC. – “A PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY!!” AN EXAMPLE OF THE CRIMINAL RACKET AS FOLLOWS: THE BELOW FORM ARE “MALICIOUS” CRIMINAL CHARGES PENDING AGAINST BRIDGEWATER A WITNESS, IN REALITY THE GOVERNMENT CONSPIRED UNDER THE COLOR OF LAW, CAME ONTO BRIDGEWATER PROPERTY, BREAKING IN ENTERING, STOLE AND CONVERTED ALL BRIDGEWATER PROPERTY INCLUDING A RIFLE, APPLIANCES, COMPUTERS, BRIDGEWATER BUSINESS AND PERSONAL PROPERTY AND SUBSEQUENLY FALSELY CHARGED BRIDGEWATER WITH THEFT BY TAKING, KEPT CHARGES PENDING AGAINST BRIDGEWATER FOR TWO YEAR(FALSE IMPRISONMENT), JUST FOR THE PURPOSE TO PREVENT AGAINST BRIDGEWATER FROM SUING – AND IN RETAILATION, LATER DISMISSED(IN ADDITION AFTER ATTEMPTING TO SUE – “JUDICIAL RACKETEERING” THE JUDGE RULED THAT STATUE LIMITATION EXPIRED ANOTHER JUDGE’S NULL AND VOID ORDER ! THE ACTS OR OMISSIONS OF THE CRIMINAL RACKET CONSTITUTE MALICIOUS PROSECUTION, LIBEL, ETC. ALL LAWSUITS FILED BY BRIDGEWATER AGAINST THE PERPETRATORS DISMISSED(ALL WHILE THEY WERE SIMULTANEOUSLY COMMITTING OVER CRIMES AGAINST BRIDGEWATER BUSINESS, PERSON OR PROPERTY!!

UNCONSTITUIONAL TRAFFIC STOP IN VIOLATION OF BRIDEWATER 4TH U.S. CONTITUIONAL RIGHT,  TRESSPASSED ON TO BRIDGEWATER’S PROPERTY, KIDNAPPED BRIDGEWATER IN VIOLATION OF  750.349 

COMMITTED ASSAULT BATTERY IN VIOLATION OF MICHIGAN PENAL CODE 750.81 RIGHT BEFORE THE 2012 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS IN RETALIATION BECAUSE BRIDGEWATER FILED A COMPLAINT ENTITLED BRIDGEWATER VS. OBAMA(SEE ABOVE CASES 1-4 AND #8), “LIBELED AND/OR SLANDERED”

BRIDGEWATER IN VIOLATION OF THE MICHIGAN PENAL CODE  750.370 Falsely and maliciously accusing another, BRIDGEWATER AND REFERRED TO  BRIDGEWATER  “delusional.” 

OBAMA AND/OR HOLDER JOINT THE BELOW LAWSUIT – SEE SIX CASE DOWN – ENJOIN FILER REVIEW

​

​

OBAMA SHARING MILITARY INFORMATON WITH CHINA AND TELLS U.S. CITIZENS THEY NEED TO SURRENDER THEIR RIGHTS AS FOLLOWS:

• TRAINS CHINESE TROOPS ON U.S. SOIL
• knowingly, intentionally devised or intended to devise a scheme to defraud (the two witnesses and victims of Government official acting in their individual capacities, under the color of law engaged in racketeering activity)use of the mail for the purpose of executing, or attempting to execute, the scheme (or specified fraudulent acts)scheme or artifice to deprive another of the intangible right of honest services in violaton of USC section 18 U.S. Code § 1346..or devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, transmits or causes to be transmitted by means of wire, radio, or television communication in interstate or foreign commerce, any writings, signs, signals, pictures, or sounds for the purpose of executing such scheme or artifice, devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, transmits or causes to be transmitted by means of wire, radio, or television communication in interstate or foreign commerce, any writings, signs, signals, pictures, or sounds for the purpose of executing such scheme or artifice, in violation of 18 usc section 1343  (1) a scheme to defraud, and (2) the mailing of a letter, etc., for the purpose of executing the scheme.”)) that the defendant voluntarily and intentionally devised or participated in a scheme to defraud another out of money; (2) that the defendant did so with the intent to defraud; (3) that it was reasonably foreseeable that interstate wire communications would be used; and (4) that interstate wire communications were in fact used)I
  • knowingly and willfully, filed “under seal” 
  • falsified, concealed, or covered up by trick, scheme, or device a material fact;  made a material false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation about Bridgewater a party not part of that proceeding; or
  • made or used a false writing or document knowing the same to contain a material false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry; (“exploited Bridgewater’s name-identity theft”) about Bridgewater a party not part of the judicial proceeding in violation of 18 USC section Code section 1001 
  • conspired with Merrick Garland in his official cacity as U.S. COURT OF PPEA
  • falsified, concealed, or covered up by trick, scheme, or device a material fact;  made a material false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation about Bridgewater a party not part of that proceeding; or
  • made or used a false writing or document knowing the same to contain a material false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry; (“exploited Bridgewater’s name-identity theft”) about Bridgewater a party not part of the   judicial proceeding Bridgewater s. Trump Case Number:19-1141, (see below)via statements, representations, writings or documents submitted TO each other  false court documents which,  lacked jurisdiction of the subject matter, or of the parties, or acted in a manner inconsistent with due process

THE CONTROVERSY!!

PROPERTY IN DISPUTE, 125 TRILLION DOLLARS, ON OR ABACT IN JOINT PARTICIPATION WITH BIDEN, TRUMP, GRANT U.S.A. SOVERIGNTY TO CHINA, FAIL TO PROTECT BORDER, ADVOCATE TO OVERTHROW THE U.S. GOVERNMENT AND/OR “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR” BY VIOLENCE, OPPRESSION, CONSPIRACY TO DEPRIVE RIGHTS AS DEFINED IN 18 U.S.C. SECTION 241 AND/OR 18 U.S.C. SECTION 242, DEFRAUD THE U.S.A. IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 371, EXPLOIT, COMMIT FRAUD ON THE COURT AND DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES OUT OF MONEY AND/OR PROPERTY IS INELIGIBLE TO HOLD OFFICE AS THE UNITED STATES PRESIDENT FOR RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY, TREASON AND CONSPIRACY WITH DONALD TRUMP TO DEFRAUD TWO WITNESSES AND/OR REBELLION AND INSURRECTION – JAN. 6, 2021 CAPITOL ATTACKS

OBAMA TELL PEOPLE THEY MUST SUBMIT TO THE ONE WORLD ORDER AND/OR SURRENDER THEIR RIGHTS TO AS FOLLOWS:

OBAMA ACTS OR OMISSION CONSTITUTE TREASON AND HE IS “RETRO-ACTIVITY IMPEACHED” AND/OR REMOVED FROM OFFICE, ALL EXECUTIVE ORDER ETC. INCLUDING OBAMA CARE, MILITARY DETAINMENT OF U.S. CITIZENS WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW “RFID CHIPPING THE GENERAL PUBLIC” IS NULL AND VOID AND WITHOUT ANY LEGAL EFFECT. ALL DISMISSED LAWSUITS INVOLVING HIS BIRTH CERTIFICATE IS NULL AND VOID, IT IS DECLARED OBAMA IS NOT A U.S. CITIZEN, AND WAS NOT ELIGIBLE TO HOLD OFFICE AS THE U.S. PRESIDENT

,  

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S. Code § 2383 – Rebellion or insurrection,

Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

BIDEN, HARRIS, TRUMP, U.S. SENATORS ET AL ARE GUILTY FOR THE ACTS OR OMISSIONS, ONE OR MORE GUILTY OF “CONSPIRACY, COMPLICITY, AIDING AND ABETTING TRUMP,” TO DEFRAUD BOTH SHARON AND JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER(FORMER REAL ESTATE BROKER AND/OR BUSINESS OWNER(S) REBELLION OR INSURRECTION FOR FAILING TO PROSECUTE TRUMP AND ARE INCAPABLE OF HOLD “ANY OFFICE UNDER THE UNITED STATES!! ”

PURSUANT TO MY DUTY AS A U.S. CITIZEN AND PURSUANT TO THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE(TO FORM A NEW GOVERNMENT PURSANT TO THE DECLARATION OF INDENDENCE VIA BIDEN, HARRIS, TRUMP, U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES TREASON, CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT GENOCIDE ON U.S. CITIZENS ETC.

THE 50 UNITED STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR VS. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT PROSECUTOR KARIM A.A. KHAN MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL( AND PREDESSCORS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO HIS TERM, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ALL ACTING ATTORNEY GENERALS, ALL STATE ATTORNEY GENERALS, DISTRICT PROSECUTORS, ALL ACTING ATTORNEY GENERALS, ALL APPOINTED SPECIAL PROSECUTORS ET AL)

COMES NOW “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR APPEARS BEFORE THIS COURT TO DECLARE THE LEGAL RELATION BETWEEN FIRST MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY(FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT)AS ONE OR MORE CHIEF JUDGE FOR D.C. CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS AND/OR U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE, AND THE RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF THE PARTIES, FOR THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL ONE OR MORE JOE BIDEN IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITIES FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT(AND PREDESSCORS FOR JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT), KAMALA HARRIS, legal relationship between parties and their rights in a matter before the court.  

“RIGHTS AND DUTIES OF THE PARTIES AND DECLARATORY JUDGMENT

“THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER VS. KAMALA HARRIS

IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DISTRICT ATTORNEY” FOR SAN FRANCISCO, CA. 2008 AND CONTINUING THRU PRESENT

The role of the United States Attorney is to: (1) prosecute criminal cases brought by the federal government; (2) prosecute or defend civil cases where the United States is a party; and (3) collect debts owed to the federal government when administrative agencies are unable to do so and responsible for the prosecution of violations of federal law(and U.S. State Attorney(s) – as in Kamala Harris – District Attorney for San Francisco, California, role is to prosecute Criminals for State crimes.

The role of the international criminal court Prosecutor is to examine situations and/or complaints under the jurisdiction of the Court where genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and aggression appear to have been committed, and carrying out investigations and prosecutions against the individuals who are allegedly most responsible for those crimes. 

CONTENDS CONSPIRE WITH ONE OR MORE JACOB ROTHCHILD, MAJOR CORPORATIONS AND/OR DONALD TRUMP, DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES, EXPLOIT, COMMIT FRAUD ON THE COURT, WIRE FRAUD, ENGAGE IN A PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY AND/OR THE U.S.A. IT’S DEPARTMENT AND AGENCIES, ACT IN JOINT PARTICIPATION WITH CHINA AND RUSSIA, “ONE WORLD COMMUNIST COUNTRY” USE TRICK, SCHEME, “LIE” TO THE PUBLIC ABOUT THE COV-19 INJECTION, PREDICTIVE POLICING, ENSLAVE UNDER CHINA, ENSLAVE U.S. CITIZENS AND OBTAIN 125 TRILLION DOLLARS, COMMIT GENOCIDE VIOLATION OF THE NUMBERBERG CODE,

KAMALA HARRIS, BIDEN, ISSUE VOID ORDER, COMMIT FRAUD ON THE COURT, COMMIT WIRE FRAUD, “JUDICIAL RACKETEERING” UPURP PUBLIC OFFICE, DISCRIMINATE AGAINST BOTH SHARON AND JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER DENY AND/OR DEPRIVE BOTH ET AL UPURP THE OFFICE OF THE U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL TO FUTHER DEFRAUD BOTH WITNESSES SHARON AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER ENGAGE IN A PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY, CONSPIRE TO COMMIT AND/OR VIOLATE THE RICO ACT,  COMMIT MULTIPLE CRIMES IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C SECTION(S) 215, 656, 657, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1014, 1341, 1343, or 1344 of this title, affecting a financial institution, or 18 USC SECTION(S) 471, 472, 473, 474, 476, 477, 478, 479, 480, 481, 485, 486, 487, 488, 501, 502, 510, 542, 545, 555, 842, 844, 1028, 1029, or 1030 AND/OR TWO OR MORE 18 USC 666(a)(1) (relating to Federal program fraud); 18 USC 1001 (relating to fraud and false statements); 18 U.S.C SECTION 1031major fraud against the United States); 18 USC section 1032 (relating to concealment of assets from conservator, receiver, or liquidating agent of insured financial institution); 18 USC section 1341 (relating to mail fraud); or section 1343 (relating to wire fraud),involving the sale of assets acquired or held by the the [1] Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as conservator or receiver for a financial institution or any other conservator for a financial institution appointed by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, or the National Credit Union Administration, as conservator or liquidating agent for a financial institution, shall order that the person forfeit to the United States any property, real or personal, which represents or is traceable to the gross receipts obtained, directly or indirectly, as a result of such violation.

(4)

WHERE AS BRIDGEWATER CONTENDS THAT THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE IS We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights …Declaration of Independence guarantees the right to “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.”U.S. Constitutional rights, SHE AND HUMANITY U.S. IS A SOVERIGN COUNTRY, WITH FREEDOMS, RIGHTS, AND THE BIDEN, HARRIS, BIO

First: The existence of an enterprise;
Second: That the enterprise was engaged in or its activities affected interstate
or foreign commerce;
Third: That (name) was employed by or associated with that enterprise;
Fourth: That (name) knowingly conducted that enterprise’s affairs or that
(name) knowingly participated, directly or indirectly, in the conduct of that
enterprise’s affairs; and
Fifth: That (name) knowingly (conducted) (participated, directly or indirectly,
in the conduct of) that enterprise’s affairs through (a pattern of racketeering
activity) (the collection of an unlawful debt), as alleged in the indictment.

With respect to an offense listed in subsection (a)(3) committed for the purpose of executing or attempting to execute any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent statements, pretenses, representations, or promises, the gross receipts of such an offense shall include any property, real or personal, tangible or intangible, which is obtained, directly or indirectly, as a result of such offense.

of this title,shall order that the person forfeit to the United States any property constituting, or derived from, proceeds the person obtained directly or indirectly, as the result of such violation.

The court, in imposing sentence on a person convicted of a Federal health care offense, shall order the person to forfeit property, real or personal, that constitutes or is derived, directly or indirectly, from gross proceeds traceable to the commission of the offense.

(8)The court, in sentencing a defendant convicted of an offense under section 1028, 1029, 1341, 1342, 1343, or 1344, or of a conspiracy to commit such an offense, if the offense involves telemarketing (as that term is defined in section 2325), shall order that the defendant forfeit to the United States any real or personal property—

(A)

used or intended to be used to commit, to facilitate, or to promote the commission of such offense; and

(B)

constituting, derived from, or traceable to the gross proceeds that the defendant obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offense.

(b)

(1)

The forfeiture of property under this section, including any seizure and disposition of the property and any related judicial or administrative proceeding, shall be governed by the provisions of section 413 (other than subsection (d) of that section) of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970 (21 U.S.C. 853).

(2)

KNOWINGLY, LIED TO THE AMERICAN PUBLIC AND HUMANITY FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE TO SCAR PEOPLE TO RECEIVE THE “NANO-TECH SENSOR – UNDER SKIN SURVIELLENCE” CONTROL – DEATH VAX TO DEPOPULATE

A declaratory judgment is a court-issued judgment that defines and outlines the rights and obligations of each party in a contract. Declaratory judgments have the same effect and force as final judgments and are legally binding. These judgments are also called a declaration or declaratory relief.  THIS CASE IS RIPE!!

DECLARATORY JUDGMENT

IT IS SO ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED

   1)That this “COMMON LAW COURT”court adjudge and decree and declare that the rights and legal relations of the parties      to the  subject matter here in controversy, in order that the declaration shall have the force and effect of a final judgment and decree.

2)  That the court enters a judgment declaring that Plaintiff is fully vested with the right to prosecute, via the Private Attorney General Statue (RICO) and/or collect and/or recover fines et al on behalf of the THE 50 STATES IN VIOLATION OF 18 USC SECTION 371.

3) That the court enter judgment declaring the Barak H.Obama(AKA Barry Soertoes) and/or “et als,” can not exert executive privilege.

4) That the court enter judgment declaring the “The United States ex rel Sharon Bridgewater Private Attorney General and/OR Relator(Claimant et al )is fully  vested with the right to have a writ of quo warranto issued upon Loretta Lynch in her official capacity as United States Attorney General.

5) That this court adjudge and decree that Lynch violated the “The United States ex rel Sharon Bridgewater Private Attorney General and/Relator(Claimant et al )class Plaintiff second amendment rights are liable to the Plaintiff for damages.

6) That this court adjudge and decree that the “The United States ex rel Sharon Bridgewater Private Attorney General and/or Relator(Claimant et al )has absolute right to  claim her personal and business property that were illegally stolen and taken without due process of law.

7) That this court adjudge that Loretta Lynch is disqualified to prosecute  Hillary Clinton e-mail as United States Attorney General or her appointment constitute conflict of interest

8) That this court adjudge and decree that the Plaintiff Bridgewater has absolute right to claim her personal and business that this court a

10) Prejudgment writs of attachment for the United States of America and the class Plaintiffs in the amount of $150,000,000,000 Trillion Dollars.

 11) THAT ALL U.S. GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS(IN THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH, LEGISLATIVE BRANCH, AND/OR JUDICIAL BRANCH ARE ARE DISQUALIFIED FROM ANY PROCEEDING

 12)Sharon Bridgewater is Prosecutor for the 50 States and/or the People of the 50 States and all U.S. Government Employees and/or U.S. State Attorney General are are employed and by a “Racketeering Enterprize in violation of 18 U.S.C. section 196

 13) Declaratory Judgment for the United States and as alleged in cause number III.

 14) Temporary restraining order enjoin

 15) FILE THE ATTACHED EXH. A, B, C AND D

 16) Permit Plaintiff to file a first amended consolidate complaint in intervention to more fully ____________for de-novo review and within 60 days as permitted by law.

1)IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREEDcourt adjudge and decree and declare that the rights and legal relations of the parties      to the  subject matter here in controversy, in order that the declaration shall have the force and effect of a final judgment and decree.

2)  That the court enters a judgment declaring that Plaintiff is fully vested with the right to prosecute, via the Private Attorney General Statue (RICO) and/or collect and/or recover fines et al on behalf of the United States Government the Federal False Claims Act.

3) That the court enter judgment declaring the Barak H.Obama(AKA Barry Soertoes) and/or “et als,” can not exert executive privilege.

4) That the court enter judgment declaring the “The United States ex rel Sharon Bridgewater Private Attorney General and/or Relator(Claimant et al )is fully  vested with the right to have a writ of quo warranto issued upon Loretta Lynch in her official capacity as United States Attorney General.

5) That this court adjudge and decree that Lynch violated the “The United States ex rel Sharon Bridgewater Private Attorney General and/or Qui Tam Relator(Claimant et al )class Plaintiff second amendment rights are liable to the Plaintiff for damages in the amount of $10,000.00.

6) That this court adjudge and decree that the “The United States ex rel Sharon Bridgewater Private Attorney General and/or Qui Tam Relator(Claimant et al )has absolute right to  claim her personal and business property that were illegally stolen and taken without due process of law.

7) That this court adjudge that Loretta Lynch is disqualified to prosecute  Hillary Clinton e-mail as United States Attorney General or her appointment constitute conflict of interest

8) That this court adjudge and decree that the Plaintiff Bridgewater has absolute right to claim her personal and business that this court a

9) Because the Class Plaintiff can not sue an public official in excess of $10,000 pursuant to the enter  partial  judgment for “The United States ex rel Sharon Bridgewater Private Attorney General and/or Relator(Claimant et al )”Class Plaintiff Sharon Bridgewater judgment against Loretta Lynch  and to deliver this partial payment at the Plaintiffs post office box.

10) Prejudgment writs of attachment for the United States of America and the class Plaintiffs in the amount of $150,000,000,000 Trillion Dollars.

 11) Consolidate the hearing with the petition for Habeas Corpus

 12) THAT “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER IS PROSECUTOR

 13) Declaratory Judgment for the United States and as alleged in cause number III.

 14) Temporary restraining order enjoin

 15) FILE THE ATTACHED EXH. A, B, C AND D

 16) Permit Plaintiff to file a first amended consolidate complaint in intervention to more fully ____________for de-novo review and within 60 days as permitted by law.

The Defendant demand Judgment and claim _________against Loretta Lynch in personam Plaintiff (DOJ, ATF, Barak H. Obama et al)for claim

AMOUNT DUE 125 TRILLION ______________________________________________________________________________

AMOUNT PAID: ZERO

Certify a class

• The Espionage Act and/or  Trading with the Enemy Act,

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ALL CHINA, RUSSIA, IRAN AGREEMENT, TRADING WITH THE ENEMY ARE

The Trading with the Enemy Act (TWEA) of 1917 (40 Stat. 411, codified at 12 U.S.C. § 95 and 50 U.S.C. § 4301 et seq.) is a United States federal law, enacted on October 6, 1917, that gives the President of the United States the power to oversee or restrict any and all trade between the United States and its enemies in times of war. TWEA was amended in 1933 by the Emergency Banking Act to extend the president’s authority also in peace time. It was amended again in 1977 by the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to restrict the application of TWEA only in times of war, while the IEEPA was intended to be used in peace time.^[1]

TWEA is sometimes confused with the IEEPA, which grants somewhat broader powers to the President, and which is invoked during states of emergency when the United States is not at war. The IEEPA was passed in an attempt to rein in perceived abuses by the US President of the TWEA by making the powers subject to the National Emergencies Act (NEA). The NEA included a legislative veto to allow Congress to terminate a national emergency with a concurrent resolution.^[2] However, the U.S. Supreme Court found such legislative vetoes unconstitutional in Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Chadha. Following the Court’s decision, Congress amended the NEA to require a joint resolution.

DISCRIMINATING AGAINST “REPRESENTATIVE” OF THE 50 STATES TO DECLARE THAT THE MERRICK GARLAND, CONSPIRED WITH DONALD TRUMP COMMITTED CRIMINAL ACTS OF REBELLION AND INSURRECTION, DUE PROCESS, WIRE FRAUD(ONE OR MORE JOE BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS IS INELIGLE TO HOLD OFFICE AS THE U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, ILLEGALLY, UNLAWFULLY URPURP “THE OFFICE OF THE U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL”)The Fourteenth Amendment is better known for protecting civil rights. It grants citizenship to all people born in the United States, guarantees equal protection of privileges and immunities of citizens, and requires due process of law. But the events of January 6th brought the disqualification clause into the spotlight.

ALL REPUBLICANS -PUBLIC OFFICIALS HAD A LEGAL DUTY TO CONVICT TRUMP AFTER SECOND IMPEACHMENT AND ATTACKS ON CAPITOL JAN. 6, 2021 AND FAILED TO, PUT INSTEAD SUPPORT TRUMP IN 2024 AND ARE LIABILE FOR TRUMP ACTS OR OMISSION(TREASON), IN ADD IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 371 CONSPIRING TO COMMIT TREASON(AND/OR ARE GUILITY OF TREASON, 18 U.S. Code § 2383 – Rebellion or insurrection, ENGAGED IN A PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY(GENOCIDE, VIOLATION OF THE NUREMBERG CODE__________________________IS DISQUALIFIED AND/OR INELIGIBLE TO HOLD PUBLIC OFFICE, FORFEITS ALL RIGHTS TO HOLD OFFICE, BOOKS, DOCUMENTS, LIST TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, PERMANENT INJUNCTION, CRIMINAL LIABILITY, TESTIMONY, CONVICTION AND/OR SENTENCE DECLARATION THAT ALL ON OR ABOUT JAN. 1, 1993 THAT GEORGE H. BUSH DURING THE PERSION GULF WAR CONSPIRED TO DESTROY, COMMUNIST PARTY CHINA, ENSLAVE HUMANTY

1. DAPRH
2. ILLEGAL IMMGRATES
3. MIDDLE CLAS LIST

ONE WORLD ORDER, AND ALL LOST THEIR REPRESENTATIVE CAPACITIES AS U.S. GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS JOE BIDEN’S EXECUTIVE ORDERS ARE NULL AND VOID AND WITHOUT ANY LEGAL EFFECT(DEFACTO PRESIDENT, U.S.SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, U.S. REPRESENTATIVES, ILLEGALLY, UNLAWFULLY UPURP “THE OFFICE OF THE U.S. PRESIDENT, VICE PRESIDENT, U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, “ALL JUDGES” BY FORCE, ALL ARE OPERATING WITH THE COMMUNIST PARTY CHINA “AS” ONE, AND THEIR ARE NO CHECKS AND BALANCES, RIGHTS AND DUTY OF BRIDGEWATER TO FORM A NEW GOVERNMENT PURSUANT TO THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENCE

DECLARATION THAT ALL JOE BIDEN’S EXECUTIVE ORDERS ARE NULL AND VOID AND WITHOUT ANY LEGAL EFFECT,

ADJUDICATION BI-LATERAL CLASS REPRESENTATIVES AND/OR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AND ADJUDICIFATION FOR PROSECUTOR OF THE U.S.A. AND/OR “INTERNATIONAL PROSECUTOR FOR HEINOUS CRIMES AGAINST BOTH SHARON BRIDGEWATER AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER(AND HUMANITY)CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY, WAR CRIMES, GENOCIDE, VIOLATIONS OF THE NUREMBERG CODE ETC.

DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AND ADJUDIFICATION OF PROSECUTOR FOR THE U.S. THAT BY OPERATION OF LAW “ON OR ABOUT JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL IS PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND/OR THE 50 UNITED STATES”

MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY ENGAGED IN A PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY, COMMITTED ONE OR MORE WIRE FRAUD IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1343 AND/OR 1341 FORFEITS THE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, CONSPIRED WITH DONALD TRUMP, VIOLATED 18 U.S. Code § 2383 – Rebellion or insurrection PURSUANT TO RICO LAW AND FORFEIT THE OFFICE TO “THE UNITED STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR”

NOTICE OF DECLARATORY JUDGMENT THAT MERRICK GARLAND, ALL U.S. STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL(S), SPECIAL PROSECUTORS ARE EMPLOYEES OF THE U.S. GOVERNMENT DID CONDUCT AND/OR PARTICIPATE IN A RICO ENTEPRISE THROU A PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION(S) 1961(5), 1962(C), AND ALL DID ASSOCIATE WITH THE RICO ENTERRIZE OF INDIVIDUAL WHO WERE ASSOCIATED IN FACT AND WHO ENGAGED IN, AND WHOSE ACTIVITIES DID AFFECT, INTERSTATE AND/OR FOREIGN COMMERCE, AND ALL DEFENDANTS DID CONDUCT AND/OR PARTICIPATE, EITHER DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY IN THE CONDUCT OF THE AFFAIRS OF THE RICO ENTEPRIZE THROUGH A PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY IN VIOLATION OF ONE OR MORE SECTIONS 1961(4), (5), (9) AND 1962 AND DURING THE 10 CALENDAR YEARS PRECEDING ____, ALL DEFENDANTS DID COOPERATE JOINTLY AND/OR SEVERALLY IN THE COMMISSION OF TWO(2) OR MORE OF THE RICO PREDICATE ACTS ITEMIZED IN THE RICO LAWS AT 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1962(C)AND/OR ARE LIABLE TO THE U.S.

NOTICE OF FORFEITURE(RETROACTIVE) OF OFFICE!!

REQUEST FOR EXTRADICITION(CLASS ACTION)

CLASS-ACTION FORFEITURE OF OFFICE(S) INCLUDING ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES AND “NEWLY” APPOINTED CO-CONSPIRATOR K.B. JACKSON, THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, THE VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, ALL U.S. SENATORS AND CONGRESSMAN AS FOLLOWS:

RETROACTIVE IMPEACHMENT FOR ERIC HOLDER IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA!!

kamalaharrisarticlesofimpeachmentcurrentlyinprocessofamendmentsDownload

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION – IN RE “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR VS. MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS CHIEF JUDGE FOR U.S. COURT OF APPEALS D.C. CIRCUIT AND/OR ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA – ENJOIN MERRICK GARLAND FROM ILLEGALLY, UNLAWFULLY UPSURPING THE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL AND PREVENT MERRICK GARLAND FROM “OCCUPYING THE OFFICE OF THE U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL”

DECLARATORY JUDGMENT THAT ERIC HOLDER IS GUILTY OF REBELLION AND CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT TREASON AND/OR TREASON ,

§2385. Advocating overthrow of Government

Whoever knowingly or willfully advocates, abets, advises, or teaches the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying the government of the United States or the government of any State, Territory, District or Possession thereof, or the government of any political subdivision therein, by force or violence, or by the assassination of any officer of any such government; AND IS INELIBLE TO HOLD OFFICE AS THE U.S. PRESIDENT!!

RETRO-ACTIVE ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT ENTITLED THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR VS. BARAK H. OBAMA IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS PRESIDENT AS FOLLOWS:

RETROACTIVE IMPEACHMENT OF BARAK H. OBAMA IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS PRESIDENT AND CONVICTION AS FOLLOWS

RETRO-ACTIVE ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT ENTITLED THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR VS. ERIC HOLDER IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL

RECENT K. JACKSON IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DISTRICT COURT JUDGE FOR THE DISTRICT COURT OF COLUMBIA AND/OR U.S. DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS D.C. CIRCUIT

RETROACTIVE IMPEACHMENT OF KAMALA HARRIS IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS U.S. ATTORNEY FOR SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION FROM “ACTING, UPSURPING THE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES PRESIDENT AS FOLLOWS:

_______________________

CLASS ACTION RETROACTIVE IMPEACHMENT AS FOLLOWS:

DEATH PENALTY

Title 18: 

—      844(d) (transportation of explosives in interstate commerce for certain purposes),

Title 49:

—          1472(i) (aircraft piracy within special aircraft jurisdiction), and/or — 1472(n) (aircraft piracy outside special aircraft jurisdiction).