Article VI  Supreme Law – Clause 2 The U.S. CONSTITUTION IS THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND! “This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.”

No man is this county is so high that he is above the law.  No Officer of the law may set that law at defiance with impunity.  All the Officers of the government, from the highest to the lowest, are creatures of the law and are bound to obey it.  It is the only supreme over in our system of government, and every man who by accepting Office participates in its functions is only the more strongly bound to submit to that supremacy, and to observe the limitations which it imposes upon the exercise of the authority which it gives.  Unites States v. lee, 106 U.S. 196, 220.

ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT JUDGES VIOLATIONS OF OATH OF OFFICE!(CRIMINALS) AND/OR advocating to overthrow of our constitutional form of government(see below).

JAN. 6, 2021

DONALD TRUMP’S REBELLION AND INSURRECTION

In furtherance OF A CONSPIRACY TO DESTROY AMERICA AND/OR DEFRAUD(AND/OR COMMIT OFFENSES)AGAINST THE U.S.A. IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 371, DONALD TRUMP KNOWINGLY, INTENTIONALLY sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto,  “ROUND-UP A GROUP OF CONFEDERATES” AND COMMITTED REBELLION AND INSURRECTION IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S. Code § 2383

ILLEGAL, UNLAWFUL USURPATION OF BRIDGEWATER BUSINESS TO OBTAIN FINANCIAL BENEFIT(VIOLATION OF THE TRADE COMMISSION, S.E.C. ETC. )WIRE FRAUD, ETC.

THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT PROHIBITS ANYONE WHO COMMITS REBELLION OR INSURRECTION DISQUALIFIED AND INELIGIBLE TO HOLD OFFICE AS FOLLOWS:

https://www.senate.gov/about/origins-foundations/senate-and-constitution/14th-amendment.htm

RETROACTIVE ADJUDICATION THAT DONALD TRUMP IS ADJUDICATED GUILTY AS CHARGED FOR REBELLION AND INSURRECTION 18 U.S. Code § 2383 – AND IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, DECREED THAT DONALD TRUMP IS incapable of holding any office under the United States, and enjoined from putting his name of “the 50 States” 2024 Presidential Ballot!!(see intervention)”.

MARCH 5, 2024

ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES UNANIMOUSLY RULE FOR TRUMP ALLOWING TRUMP TO REMAIN ON THE BALLOT AND RUN FOR PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA(AIDING, ABETTING AND/OR CONSPIRING TO COMMIT REBELLION AND INSURRECTION) DESPITE HE sets on foot, assisted, or engages in rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof on or about Jan. 6, 2021 and is INELIGLE AND DISQUALIFIED TO HOLD OFFICE AS THE U.S.A. PRESIDENT!!

ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT AIDING, ABETTING(FAILED TO DO THEIR LEGAL DUTIES AS U.S. SUPREME COURT JUDGES) IS ADJUDICATED GUILTY AS CHARGED BY THE “50 STATES” EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR FOR CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT & REBELLION AND INSURRECTION AND/OR REBELLION AND INSURRECTION(IS LIABLE AS PRINCIPLE IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 2) – TRUMP, RULE TRUMP REMAIN ON 2024 BALLOT EVEN THOUGH THEY ARE WELL AWARE HE IS GUILTY OF REBELLION AND INSURRECTION!!

https://www.scotusblog.com/2024/03/supreme-court-rules-states-cannot-remove-trump-from-ballot-for-insurrection/

https://www.cnn.com/2024/03/06/politics/mitch-mcconnell-endorses-trump/index.html

ALL ARE ADJUDICATED GUILTY OF REBELLION AND INSURRECTION AND RETROACTIVELY IMPEACHED AND DISQUALIFIED FROM HOLDING PUBLIC OFFICE(AS PRESIDENT AND/OR U.S. SURPEME COURT JUSTICES)!!

https://www.senate.gov/about/origins-foundations/senate-and-constitution/14th-amendment.htm

-CLICK HERE- FOR THE “50 STATES(ALL 50 STATES)” EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR QUI TAM RELATOR RETROACTIVE AJUDICATION JUDGMENT ORDER DECLARING TRUMP INELIGIBLE TO REMAIN ON THE BALLOT AS U.S. PRESIDENT AND/OR(TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION) QUALIFIED AND DISQUALIFYING DONALD TRUMP, AND ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES FROM HOLDING PUBLIC OFFICE

Violation of Oath of Office and Walker v Members of Congress

Violation of Oath of Office!!

(see intervention – breach of contract – all U.S. Supreme Court are liable for breach of contract)

            In refusing to obey the law of the Constitution and call an Article V Convention when required to do so, the members of Congress not only violated federal income tax law but their oath of office as well. The Constitution requires that all members of Congress must take an oath of office to support the Constitution before assuming office. In order to comply with the Constitution, Congress has enacted federal laws to execute and enforce this constitutional requirement.

Federal law regulating oath of office by government officials is divided into four parts along with an executive order which further defines the law for purposes of enforcement. 5 U.S.C. 3331, provides the text of the actual oath of office members of Congress are required to take before assuming office. 5 U.S.C. 3333 requires members of Congress sign an affidavit that they have taken the oath of office required by 5 U.S.C. 3331 and have not or will not violate that oath of office during their tenure of office as defined by the third part of the law, 5 U.S.C. 7311 which explicitly makes it a federal criminal offense (and a violation of oath of office) for anyone employed in the United States Government (including members of Congress) to “advocate the overthrow of our constitutional form of government”. The fourth federal law, 18 U.S.C. 1918 provides penalties for violation of oath office described in 5 U.S.C. 7311 which include: (1) removal from office and; (2) confinement or a fine.

The definition of “advocate” is further specified in Executive Order 10450 which for the purposes of enforcement supplements 5 U.S.C. 7311. One provision of Executive Order 10450 specifies it is a violation of 5 U.S.C. 7311  for any person taking the oath of office to advocate “the alteration … of the form of the government of the United States by unconstitutional means.” Our form of government is defined by the Constitution of the United States. It can only be “altered” by constitutional amendment. Thus, according to Executive Order 10450 (and therefore 5 U.S. 7311) any act taken by government officials who have taken the oath of office prescribed by 5 U.S.C. 3331which alters the form of government other by amendment, is a criminal violation of the 5 U.S.C. 7311.

Congress has never altered the Article V Convention clause by constitutional amendment. Hence, the original language written in the law by the Framers and its original intent remains undisturbed and intact. That law specifies a convention call is peremptory on Congress when the states have applied for a convention call and uses the word “shall” to state this. The states have applied. When members of Congress disobey the law of the Constitution and refuse to issue a call for an Article V Convention when peremptorily required to do so by that law, they have asserted a veto power when none exists nor was ever intended to exist in that law. This veto alters the form of our government by removing one of the methods of amendment proposal the law of the Constitution creates. Such alteration without amendment is a criminal violation of 5 U.S.C. 7311 and 18 U.S.C. 1918.

In addition, the members of Congress committed a second criminal violation of their oaths of office regarding an Article V Convention call. 5 U.S.C. 7311 clearly specifies it is a criminal violation for any member of Congress to advocate the overthrow of our constitutional form of government. The definition of the word “advocate” is to: “defend by argument before a tribunal or the public: support or recommend publicly.”

The single intent of the federal lawsuit Walker v Members of Congress (a public record) was to compel Congress to obey the law of the Constitution and call an Article V Convention as peremptorily required by that law, the original intent of which has never altered by constitutional amendment. The lawsuit was brought because Congress has refused to obey the law of the Constitution. Such refusal obviously establishes the objective of the members of Congress to overthrow our form of government by establishing they (the members of Congress) can disobey the law of the Constitution and thus overthrow our constitutional form of government.

The word “peremptory” precludes any objection whatsoever by members of Congress to refuse to call an Article V Convention. This peremptory preclusion certainly includes joining a lawsuit to oppose obeying the law of the Constitution and it may be vetoed by members of Congress. That act not only violates the law of the Constitution but 5 U.S.C. 7311 as well. When the members of Congress joined to oppose Walker v Members of Congress their opposition became part of the court record and therefore a matter of public record. Thus, regardless of whatever arguments for such opposition were presented by their legal counsel to justify their opposition, the criminal violation of the oath of office occurred because the members of Congress joined the lawsuit to publicly declare their opposition to obeying the law of the Constitution. Comments