KAMALA HARRIS IN HER OFFICIAL  

CAPACITY AS DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA, CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY GENERAL,(FROM 2004 to 2009, AND SUCCESSIVE CAPACITIES ONE OR MORE U.S. SENATOR FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA & PREDECESSORS AND SUCCESSORS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUNING THRU TO PRESENT

This Admiralty and Maritime Military Court is now vested with appropriate jurisdiction power to declare the rights and legal relations of the parties.   This is ripe!!   A judicial declaration is necessary and appropriate at this time under the circumstances.  THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR QUI TAM RELATOR is  entitled to the declaration, the declaration to have the force and effect of a final judgment aor decree, and to be reviewable as a final judgment or decree, and further this court may adjudge and decree and declare that the rights and legal relations(and/or determine party rights and obligations under a contract).  of the parties to the  subject matter here in controversy, in order that the declaration shall have the force and effect of a final  which this Court deems just and proper, including but not limited to, permanent injunctions against certain named parties Kamala Harris, Joe Biden, Merrick Garland, Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton directors, subsidiaries, affiliates, agents, servants, employees,  successors, attorneys, and assigns, and any other persons or entities under his control, and each of them, and all persons and entities in active concert of participation  with Biden, Trump(all Predecessor from Jan,. 1, 1993 and continuing thru present “AKA THE PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP”) all Executive Order . An actual controversy has arisen and now exists between Merrick Garland(Attorney General for the United States, Kamala Harris District Attorney for San Francisco, California, Sessions, James Comey, et al(PROSECUTORS FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA an actual controversy exist between concerning their respective rights and duties, . continued

PHASE I OF TRIAL – “RETROACTIVE” AJUDICATION AND DECLARATORY JUDGMENT ENTITLED THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR QUI RELATOR VS. KAMALA HARRIS IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SAN FRANCISCO DISTRICT ATTORNEY AND/OR INDIVIDUALLY AND MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS CHIEF JUDGE FOR U.S. COURT OF APPEALS D.C. CIRCUIT AND/OR IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE ADJUDICATION & DECLARATORY JUDGMENT – “RETROACTIVE” BILATERAL CLASS REPRESENTATIVES ENTITLED THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR QUI RELATOR(“PROSECUTOR AND/OR ACTING PROSECUTOR FOR THE PEOPLE OF THE 50 STATES AND/OR “HUMANITY”) VS. KAMALA HARRIS IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SAN FRANCISCO, DISTRICT ATTORNEY(PROSECUTOR) AND/OR MERRICK IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL( – RACKETEERING MOB BOSS[ES] FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA)

ON OR ABOUT AUGUST 4, 2008 MORE KAMALA HARRIS IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SAN FRANCISCO ATTORNEY GENERAL, JOE BIDEN, “MICHEAL-MICHELLE” BARAK H. OBAMA an agreement between at least two parties, ET AL INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO , ERIC HOLDER, U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS OFFICIAL CPA KNOWINGLY, INTENTIONALLY CAME TO THE MEETING OF THE MIND TO CONCEAL KNONWN FACTS devise or participate in a scheme to DEFRAUD THE U.S.A. exploit a vulnerable person(Sharon Bridgewater)  defraud SHARON AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER concealed known facts from Sharon and/or James S. Bridgewater they were under a duty to disclose, secretly, deceitfully knowingly, intentionally devised or intended to devise a scheme to defraud (the two witnesses and victims of Government official acting in their individual capacities, under the color of law engaged in racketeering activity)use of the mail for the purpose of executing, or attempting to execute, the scheme (or specified fraudulent acts)scheme or artifice to deprive another of the intangible right of honest services in violatIon of USC section 18 U.S. Code § 1346 or in violation of 18 USC SECTION(S) 1343 AND/OR 1341 devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, transmits or causes to be transmitted by means of wire, radio, or television communication in interstate or foreign commerce, any writings, signs, signals, pictures, or sounds for the purpose of executing such scheme or artifice, devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, transmits or causes to be transmitted by means of wire, radio, or television communication in interstate or foreign commerce, any writings, signs, signals, pictures, or sounds for the purpose of executing such scheme or artifice, in violation of 18 usc section 1343  (1) a scheme to defraud, and (2) the mailing of a letter, etc., for the purpose of executing the scheme.”)) that the defendant voluntarily and intentionally devised or participated in a scheme to defraud the two witness out of money; (2) that the defendant did so with the

consist of two parts – a weaponized agent and a delivery mechanism(OF “INJECTION IN THE BLOOD STREAM”). In addition to strategic or tactical military applications TO “FORCE” THE BIOWEAPON _________________, biological weapons the infection of livestock or agricultural produce to cause food shortages and economic loss, the creation of environmental catastrophes, and the introduction of widespread illness, fear and mistrust among the public., TO FORCE THE TWO WITNESSES AND/OR ‘HUMANITY” TO TAKE A NANO-TECH HIV-DEATH CAUSING TO CONTROL

CONSPIRED TO COMMIT ONE OR MORE

• Murder, willful killing not justified by military necessity
• Deliberately attacking civilians and non-military targets
• Targeting hospitals or other areas where the sick and wounded have gathered
• Torture
• Inhumane treatment
• Rape, forced prostitution(SEE BELOW)
• Biological experiments
• Biological Weapons
• Chemical Weapons
• Willfully causing great suffering
• Forcing someone to serve in another military
• Intentionally directing attacks against the civilian population
• Intentionally directing attacks against non-military objectives
• Intentionally directing attacks against humanitarian assistance or peacekeeping mission
• Poison, poisonous gasses, or poisoned weapons;
• Aggression – An act of aggression means “the use of armed force by a state against the sovereignty, territorial integrity or political independence of another State” and can include invasion, occupation, and annexation by the use of force, as well as the blockade of ports.

1. The Defendant agreed to commit at least two separate racketeering acts(AGAINST BOTH SHARON AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER)AND COMMIT CRIMINAL ACTS AGAINST SHARON AND/OR JAMES BUSINESS, PERSON AND/OR PROPERTY
2. The racketeering acts had a meaningful connection to the alleged illegal enterprise
3. The racketeering activity must have extended over a substantial period of time or posed a threat of continued criminal activity

n the conduct of such enterprise’s affairs through a pattern of racketeering activity or collection of unlawful debt in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 1962(c).

COMMITTED INJURING AND DAMAGING THE TWO WITNESSES AND HUMANITY VIA LIES, DECEPTION & COERCION TO TAKE THE “NANO-TECH MIND ALTERING COV-19 INJECTION” “TREASONOUS” SERPENT “SNAKES” ACTING IN JOINT PARTICIPATION WITH THE ENEMY TO ENSLAVE THE TWO WITNESS AND U.S. CITIZENS(AND/OR HUMANITY)ILLEGAL, UNLAWFUL USURPATION OF PUBLIC OFFICES – ALL CONSPIRED planned, authorized, aided, or engaged in such hostilities or attacks against the United States(the two witnesses and U.S. Citizens) & committed on or more criminal violation of section 229 (relating to chemical weapons); or sections 2332, 2332a, 2332b, 2332d, 2339A, or 2339B (relating to terrorism)confiscate the two witnesses (and all(U.S. Citizens bank accounts and/or property without due process of law , Murder for the Jan. 6, 2021 Capitol attacks(DOMESTIC AND INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM- COVID INJECTION ) 18 U.S.C. § 2280 (relating to violence against maritime navigation), 18 U.S.C. § 2281 (relating to violence against maritime fixed platforms), 18 U.S.C. § 2332 (relating to certain homicides and other violence against United States nationals occurring outside of the United States), 18 U.S.C. § 2332a (relating to use of weapons of mass destruction), 18 U.S.C. § 2332b (relating to acts of terrorism transcending national boundaries), 18 U.S.C. § 2339(relating to harboring terrorists), 18 U.S.C. § 2339A (relating to providing material support to terrorists), 18 U.S.C. § 2339B (relating to providing material support to, war crimes, genocide, crimes agains humanity violations of the number, extoriton

GENOCIDE, ENSL