THE CONTROVERSY BETWEEN “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR QUI TAM RELATOR

in that “THE PROSECUTORS” et al contends that he can discriminate against the BOTH sHARON ANbased on race, class, gender, sex, disability and/or religion, deny and/or deprive the Sharon equal protection of the laws  under the US Constitution enforce grant china u..s national sovertiy enslave , “hack my brain, lie about the true nature of Covid – defraud, out all money and property force me to received a mark, chian cashless society  enforce laws not in accordance with law and contrary to the United States Constitution, and/or violate the “50 States and/or the People of the 50 states ” inject the two witnesses with deadly COV-19 bioweapon, use 5g cell tower, weapons of mass destruction ninth and/or tenth US Constitutional right whereas Bridgewater disputes these contentions and contends that biden, harrisDonald  Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”)iunconstitutional and the Appellant is entitled to a temporary restraining enjoining Executive Order 13780 in its entirety.   

The Declaration for Human Rights, International Treaties, and   The United States Constitution is the “supreme law” of the land.” One or more Article I, Section 1, Article I, Section 9, Clause 3 or Article IV, Section 1 and 42 USC section 1983 and/or 42 USC section 1985 provides for “any person who is denied and/or deprived equal protection under the laws and/or is  injured in business, person and/or property may sue.    It is illegal for the United States Government and/or Trump to discriminate against Sharon and James S. Bridgewater exploit__________________u act under the color of law and deny and/or deprive the Sharon and/or James S. Bridgewater rights as guaranteed and/or  as defined in the United States Constitution and/or interfere with the Appellants human rights as defined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and/or International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.  The federal government may not interfere with “the 50 States,” rights and/or interfere and/or violate the Appellants US Constitutional rights.    The 9TH AMENDMENT and/or the 10th Amendment in pertinent part states:

“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”  The Constitution delegated few, enumerated powers to the Federal Government, reserving all remaining powers to the States and the people. and States are Sovereign.   “Each state retains its sovereignty, freedom, and independence, and every power, jurisdiction, and right, which is not by this Confederation expressly delegated to the United States, in Congress assembled.”  The Tenth Amendment assures that we, the people of the United States of America and each sovereign state in the Union of States, now have, and have always had, rights the federal government may not usurp. Article IV, Section 4 says, “The United States shall guarantee to

Every state in this Union a republican form of government…..”, and the Ninth Amendment states that…”The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.”  

This Admiralty and Maritime Military Court is now vested with appropriate jurisdiction and power to declare the rights and legal relations of the parties.      A judicial declaration is necessary and appropriate at this time under the circumstances.  THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR QUI TAM RELATOR is  entitled to the declaration, the declaration to have the force and effect of a final judgment aor decree, and to be reviewable as a final judgment or decree, and further this court may adjudge and decree and declare that the rights and legal relations of the parties to the  subject matter here in controversy, in order that the declaration shall have the force and effect of a final  which this Court deems just and proper, including but not limited to, permanent injunctions against certain named parties Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton directors, subsidiaries, affilates, agents, servarts, employees,  successors, attorneys, and assigns, and any other persons or entities under his control, and each of them, and all persons and entities in active concert of participation  with Biden, Trump(all Predecessor from Jan,. 1, 1993 and continuing thru present) all Executive Order . An actual controversy has arisen and now exists between Merrick Garland(Attorney General for the Unitd States, Kamala Harris District Attorney for San Frnacisco, Califonris Sessions, James Comey, et al(PROSECUTORS FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA an actual controversy exist between concerning their

respective rights and duties in that “THE PROSECUTORS” et al contends that he can discriminate against the BOTH sHARON ANbased on race, class, gender, sex, disability and/or religion, deny and/or deprive the Sharon equal protection of the laws  under the US Constitution enforce grant china u..s national sovertiy enslave , “hack my brain, lie about the true nature of Covid – defraud, out all money and property force me to received a mark, chian cashless society  enforce laws not in accordance with law and contrary to the United States Constitution, and/or violate the “50 States and/or the People of the 50 states ” inject the two witnesses with deadly COV-19 bioweapon, use 5g cell tower, weapons of mass destruction ninth and/or tenth US Constitutional right whereas Bridgewater disputes these contentions and contends that biden, harrisDonald  Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”)iunconstitutional and the Appellant is entitled to a temporary restraining enjoining Executive Order 13780 in its entirety.   

                desires a judicial determination as to the above controvery.  A declaration that “all executive orders” contratory to the United States Constitution Donald Trump Executive Order 13780 is unconstitutional and discriminatory and violates the Appellant 9th and/or 10th US Constitutional Civil rights.  A judicial declaration is necessary and appropriate at this time under the circumstances.    The Appellant has exhausted all available remedies and has not other adequate remedies at law without this court intervention and immediate declaratory and injunctive relief pursuant to  Fed. R.

This Admiralty and maritme Court court is vested  to determine the rights and duties of the Bridgewater and Donald Trump.  Trump duties and/or responsibilities is to “take care that laws are faithfully executed,”  and not to discriminate against the Plaintiff or allow thousands of illegal aliens into the country and jeopodize national security.  Bridgewater dispute Loretta Lynch’s Jan. 3rd, 2017 law.  Donald Trump, Jeff Sessions, Obama, Eric Holder, one or more “foreign officials,” corporations On or about Jan. 1, 1993 and conitning thru to present all of the above named Defendants had and expressed or implied agreement discriminated against Plaintiff based on race, class, gender, disability, natonal origin, denied and/or deprived the Plaintiff equal protection under the laws of the United States Constitution and/or the Declaration of human rights, committed overt acts, committed two or more predicate acts acts ,[illegal mononpoloy, ____anti-trust violations] retstrained interstate and/or foreign commerce, scheme to defraud, deprived the Plaintiff the retaliated against a federal witness and victim of crimes, committed war crimes, torture, slavery and peonage and illegally, unlawfully hold the Plainitff, violated court orders,  violated temporary restraiing orders, court injunctions, and no one has been prosecuted, and the Planitiff is injured and damaged and continues to be injured and damage in business, person or property.

                All Defendants are jointly and severly liable.     An actual controversy has arisen and now exists between plaintiff and defendant Donald Trump in his official capacity as United States President  and Jeff Sessions in his official capacity concerning their respective rights and duties in that plaintiff  contends “ has been harmed and damaged and continues to be damaged by Trump acts or omissions, and Trump or Sessions their “Officers, Directors, subsidiaries, affilates, agents, sevarts, employees, indepedndta contrats, successors, attorneys, and assigns, and any other persons or entitiies under his control, and each of them, and all persons and entities in active concert of participation  contend they to restrain and/or  can violate court orders, injunctions __________________.  This court is now vested with appropriate jurisdiction and power to declare the rights and legal relations of the parties.      A judicial declaration is necessary and appropriate at this time under the circumstances.   Sharon Bridgewater is  entitled to the declaration, the declaration to have the force and effect of a final judgment aor decree, and to be reviewable as a final judgment or decree, and further this court may adjudge and decree and declare that the rights and legal relations of the parties to the  subject matter here in controversy, in order that the declaration shall have the force and effect of a final 

INTERNATIONAL LAWS ARE LEGALLY BINDING AGREEMENTS, THE DECLARATION FOR HUMAN RIGHTS, THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION IS THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND

     Phase I:   CONSOLIDATED COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION DOJ FORFEITURE OF ALL PROPERTY(ALL BOOKS, GRAPHS, ETC.(ATTACHED AND/OR FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTIONTHE 50 STATES VS. JOE BIDEN (DEFAULT JUDGMENT IN REM) – ALL TANGIBLE AND INTANGLE PROPERTY INCLUDING BITCOIN, THE FEDERAL RESERVE, ALL FORMS OF FINANCI, BUSINESSES ETC.

PURSUANT TO -NOTICE OF DEFAULT ETC.)

CLAIM – ALL BOOKS, ETC. IN MERRICK GARLAND POSSESION – ATTACHED FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND/OR CLAIMS ENTITLED THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY AND/OR QU

    Phase II:  CRIMINAL TRIAL – ADJUDICATION OF

GUILT AND SENTENCE

immediate preliminary injunctions;

     Phase III:   CIVIL TRIAL – FEDERAL FALSE CLAIMS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT

LIADJUDICATION

population[TWO WITNESSES BOTH SHARON AND JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER]-CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY IN VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 7(1)(C)  IN VIOLATION OF THE Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court ”OPERATING AND CONDUCTING BUSINESS ON U.S. SOIL, AND ILLEGAL SICILIAN MAFIA INFLITRATION OF THE U.S. GOVERNMENT “THE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT,” “THE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL,” THE OFFICE OF THE 50 GOVERNORS” all are unlawfully employed by and/or associated with International Bioweapons Warfare Terrorist Enterprise engaged in, or the activities affected and continues to effect, interstate or foreign commerce, all conduct and/or continue to conduct, participate or continue to participate, directly or indirectly, in the conduct of such enterprise’s affairs through a pattern of racketeering activity or collection of unlawful debt in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 1962(c).ALL ARE USURPING PUBLIC OFFICE and both Sharon and James S. Bridgewater have been “directly” injured and damaged by all Presidents from Jan. 1, 1993 and continuing thru to present “literally,” AND PURSUANT TO ARTICLE III SECTION III OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION STATES, Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court, AJUDICATES, CONVICTS AND SENTENCE ONE OR MORE BIDEN, HARRIS, ET AL IN THIS LAWFUL, LEGAL COURT AS FOLLOWS:

See below(intervention)”RETROACTIVE”[ AUGUST, 1, 2008] COMES NOW “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR WITH ARREST WARRANTS IN REM AND DEATH WARRANT FOR KAMALA HARRIS( AND JOE BIDEN ET AL FOR TREASON, CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD THE U.S.A. WAR CRIMES, GENOCIDE, – SEE BELOW)ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE MENTIONED CRIMES, RACKETEERING TREASONOUS FRAUSTER)AND ENJOINED “LITERALLY” YES IS THIS AN ACTUAL THREAT ON THE PRESIDENTS LIFE AS WELL AS KAMALA HARRIS “FRAOM A SANE PERSON FOR KNOWING INTENTIONALLY FROM !!

search previous next tag category expand menu location phone mail time cart zoom edit close