THE COMMON LAW COURT(AND THE POWER OF THE “50 STATES” EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR PURSUANT TO THE RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATION ACT, ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME LAW!!)

THIS IS A COMMON LAW COURT(CLASS ACTION “INTERNATIONAL/TRANSNATIONAL” CRIMINAL PROSECUTION) AUTHORIZED AND/OR ESTABLISHED PURSUANT TO ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME LAW(WHICH PERMITS COMMON LAW REMEDIES FOR THOSE WHO HAVE NO OTHER ADEQUATE REMEDIES; IN THIS CASE SHARON AND JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER TWO WITENSSES)AT LAW & PURSUANT TO THE RACKETEERED INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATION ACT)

THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT(THE GOVERNMENT REPRESENTS THE FEDERAL GOVT.) AND THE 50 STATES(REPRESENT THE PEOPLE OF THE 50 STATES) ARE NOT THE SAME IN ONE!! THE STATES CAN SUE THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT(PUBLIC OFFICIALS IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITIES, AND THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES CAN BE SUED IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY HE IS NOT IMMUNE FROM SUIT, HAVE WAIVED SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY AND/OR CONSENT TO BE SUED VIA ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME LAW(SEE THIS WEBSITE) AND/OR PROSECUTION VIA CONSPIRACY WITH FOREIGN OFFICIAL TO DEFRAUD THE U.S.A. IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 371 & THE TWO WITNESSES ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME LAW)ALL RELIEF OBTAINED IN THIS WEBPAGE IS LEGAL, LAWFUL AND BINDING!!

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

This in “parallel civil/criminal proceeding” BROUGHT BY THE 50 STATES EX RESL SHARON BRIDGEWATERPRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR(FULL AUTHORITY AND/OR STANDING TO OBTAIN ALL RELIEF) and further this is an admiralty and/or maritime Claim for the purposes of Federal Rule Civil Procedure 14(c), 38E, 82, and the Supplemental Rule for Admiralty and Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture actions. It is a claim within the meaning of rule 9(h) with respect to a Maritime time attachment and garnishment remedy, and further is a Civil RICO remedies authorized by the federal statutes at 18 U.S.C. 1961 et seq. AND/OR THE FEDERAL FALSE CLAIMS ACT(AKA WHISTLEBLOWER ACT)

THIS IS AN ADMIRALITY OR MARITIME CLAIM within the meaning of rule 9(h) with respect to one or more of the following remedies:

Maritime time attachment and garnishment,
Actions in rem
Forfeiture arising from a federal statue(18 USC 985);

PROPERTY IN DISPUTE !!

The property in dispute is within the jurisdiction of the district of Columbia, or will be during the pendency of this action. $150,000,000,000,000 TRILLION IN UNITED STATES, “CURRENCY” UNITED KINDOM, SAUDIA ARABIA, CURRENCY, LIST ALL COUNTRIESGOLD, SILVER, PRECIOUS MEDAL, COINS, LIST . Papers, records, boddks, journals, ledgers, accounts, statements, memoranda, reports, invoices, work sheets, work papers, notes, transcriptions of notes, letters, correspondence, communications, abstracts, checks, diagrams, plans, blueprints, specifications, pictures, drawings, films, photographs, graphic represenatitions, diaries, calendars, desk calendars, pocket calendars, lists, logs, publications, advertisements, press releases, facsimilies, newpapers, magaizens, instructions, minutes, orders, bills, purchase orders, messages, resumes, summaries, forcase, graphs, charts, appraisals, analytical records, reports, brochures, pamphlest, circulars, trade letters, agreements, contracts, letters of intent, telegrams, telexes, cables, recordings, audio tapes, magnetic tapes, visual tapes, transcripts of tapes or recordings, computer disks, tapes and cards, informaiotn stored in oor accessible through compter or other information retrieval systems, including hard copies of electronic mail or information contained on computer hard drives, or any other writings or tangible or electronic things on which any handwriting, typing, printing, audio, visual, photographic or other forms of communcationor information which are recorded or reproduced,goods and chattels, or credits and effects ALL TANGIBLE AND INTANGLE PROPERTY, WITH ALL ACCUMLATED INTEREST THEREON Pursuant Supplemental rule requires that a complaint state the circumstances from which the claim arises with such particularly that the Defendants or claimant will be able, without moving for a more definite statement, “Supplemental Rule for certain admiralty and maritime claims b (1), C (2);” and/or other Supplemental rules require that the rem actions be instituted by means of a verified complaint.(CLICK HERE) This admiralty and maritime “within the statutory period ,” I FILED A COMPLAINT submitted and to intervene complaint relates back to the date of the original filing of the Petitioner’s petition for review, and is timely(DISABILITY Jan. 1, 1993 – statue of limitation tolled).

4. The Racketeered Influenced and Corrupt organization Acts was enacted in 1970. Under the Racketeered Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act

(a) The United States President and/or the United States Attorney General

(b)lawyers, mental health agencies, and

All have specific responsibilities to prevent human rights, violations, peonage and slavery, human trafficking, sexual exploitation, illegal spying, and predicate acts as defined in 18 USC section 1961 and are liable under the Racketeered Influence and Corrupt Organization Act t for their role in the conspiracy to engage in a pattern of racketeering activity. The Plaintiff petition this honorable Court for relief in one or more of the following, burification:

Phase I: immediate preliminary injunctions;

Phase II: liability of damages

Phase III: declaratory Judgment

Phase IV: all other lawful relief which this

Court deems just and proper, the latter to include but is not necessarily limited to, permanent injunctions against certain named parties; actual, consequential, exemplary damages and costs for RICO VIOLATIONS arising from schemes to defraud the Plaintiffs the intangle right to honest service[18 USC section 1961 – prohibited acts] human rights violations, human trafficking, illegal spying, illegal use and/or access of the Plaintiff e-mails, etc. resulting directly or indirectly from Defendants “expressed and/or implied agreement with ONE OR MORE JOE BIDEN,Barak Obama,” and/or the deprivations, and conspiracy to deprive Plaintiff, of her fundamental Rights to liberty, to privacy, to freedom of religious belief, to freedom of expression, to work for a living, etc. .

Said Rights are guaranteed to Plaintiff: by the Constitution for the United States of America, as lawfully amended (“U.S. Constitution“); by treaties enacted pursuant to the Supremacy Clause in the U.S. Constitution, including specifically the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (“Declaration“), and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the latter with specific Reservations by the U.S. Congress (“Covenant“); and by the Bill of Rights in the “50 States” .

The primary cause of this action is a widespread criminal enterprise engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity across International, Federal and/or State lines, and a conspiracy to engage in racketeering activity involving numerous RICO predicate acts during the past ten (10)-(20) calendar years.

The predicate acts alleged here cluster around human rights violations, GENOCIDE, SLAVERY(MIND CONTROL) trafficking in human body parts and/or organs, sexual exploitation, sale of securities and/or fraud , tampering with and retaliation against a qualified Federal Witness, interstate transportation of stolen property, obstruction of justice, obstruction of congressional investigation, peonage and slavery. See 18 U.S.C. §§1341 , 1344, 1346, 2319, 2320, 1505 1512, 1513, 2315, 1503, 1510, 1511 (AND A HOST OF OTHER CRIMES AS DEFINED IN 18 USC SECTION 1961 –et seq..)

The primary objective of the racketeering enterprise has been to inflict severe and sustained economic hardship upon Plaintiff, with the intent of impairing, obstructing, preventing and discouraging Plaintiff from writing, publishing and/or investigating the “overt acts.” Sharon Bridgewater request mandatory judicial notice of the document incorporated by reference infra, containing relevant adjudicative facts, and to provide formal written notice to all interested party(s) of same.

In which the two below pyramids below better illustrate:

AKA Q. ELIZ. AT TOP IS NOW AKA KING CHAR.

**** BANKING SYSTEM = ROTHCHIILD AND ROCKERFELLORS “GLOBAL ELITE” ****

*****GOVERNMENTS= BIDEN IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS PRESIDENT AND/OR INDIVIDUALLY(AND PREDECESSORS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU Present acting in joint participation with Major Corporations, their Officers, Executives etc.(Public/Private Partnership) AND U.S. CONGRESSMAN AND WOMEN AND “THE U.S.A. CRIMINAL BOSS(SEE BELOW)******

******PEOPLE = SHARON AND JAMES BRIDGEWATER(AND/OR ON BEHALF OF “WE THE PEOPLE”) *****

Read more in the 11th edition of Federal Reserve System The Fed Explained.

Beginning on or about Jan. 1, 1993 and continuing thru to present to the present time, defendants Merrick Garland in his official capacity as Chief Judge for the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and/or in his official capacity as United States Attorney General and/or individually(AND predecessors from Jan. 1, 1993 and conTiuing thru to his term including but not limited to Kamala Harris in her official capacity as San Francisco, California District Attorney(Prosecutor), all Special Prosecutors and/or “unknown” DOJ employees acted in joint participation with the above)

(THE BOSS)

MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS “DEFACTO” CAPACITY AS UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL(AND PREDECESSOR FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUNG THRU TO HIS TERM)

(THE “RACKETEERING BOSS – THE HEAD OF FOR ALL “LAW ENFORCEMENT – SOLDIERS-ACTING IN JOINT PARTICIPATION WITH “ALL JUDGES” INCLUDING ALL U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES VIA JUDICIAL RACKETEERING “DISMISSAL OF “VALID CLAIMS ETC.”)– REWORD

U.S. Attorney General from Jan. 1, 1993 and continuing thru to his term including but not limited one or more William Barr, Jeff Sessions, Loretta Lynch, Special Prosecutors, Kamal Harris, “unknown” Department of Justice Employees or gvt. employees in their official capacities and/or individually “et al,” and each of them, did knowingly, intentionally, willfully, wrongfully and unlawfully came to the meeting of the minds, entered into an unlawful agreement with one Joe Biden, Donald Trump, Barak H. Obama[AKA Barry Soertoes], George W. Bush, George H. Bush, William Bill Clinton, all U.S. Supreme Court Justices, Major Corporations and their officers, big tech Corporations, Pharmaceutical (“U.S. CITIZENS”) to enter into a public/private partnership contract ACT IN JOINT PARTICIPATION, VIOLATE THEIR OATH OF OFFICE, commit Treason act under the color of State law, IDENTITY THEFT, ILLEGALLY UNLAWFUL USE MY NAME WITHOUT THE RIGHT TO OBTAIN BENEFEIT

advocate to overthrow our constitutional form of Government, at in joint participation with “all INTERNATIONAL HEADS OF STATE” ____________________________________defraud the U.S.A. in violation of 18 U.S.C. section 371 discriminate against the Plaintiff Bridgewater

ederal health care fraud,

section 215, 656, 657, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1014, 1341, 1343, or 1344 of this title, affecting a financial institution, or

(B)

section 471, 472, 473, 474, 476, 477, 478, 479, 480, 481, 485, 486, 487, 488, 501, 502, 510, 542, 545, 555, 842, 844, 1028, 1029, or 1030 of this title,

shall order that the person forfeit to the United States any property constituting, or derived from, proceeds the person obtained directly or indirectly, as the result of such violation.

(3)The court, in imposing a sentence on a person convicted of an offense under—

(section 666(a)(1) (relating to Federal program fraud); section 1001 (relating to fraud and false statements); section 1031 (relating to major fraud against the United States); section 1032 (relating to concealment of assets from conservator, receiver, or liquidating agent of insured financial institution); section 1341 (relating to mail fraud); orsection 1343 (relating to wire fraud),

involving the sale of assets acquired or held by the the [1] Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as conservator or receiver for a financial institution or any other conservator for a financial institution appointed by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, or the National Credit Union Administration, as conservator or liquidating agent for a financial institution, shall order that the person forfeit to the United States any property, real or personal, which represents or is traceable to the gross receipts obtained, directly or indirectly, as a result of such violation

With respect to an offense listed in subsection (a)(3) committed for the purpose of executing or attempting to execute any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent statements, pretenses, representations, or promises, the gross receipts of such an offense shall include any property, real or personal, tangible or intangible, which is obtained, directly or indirectly, as a result of such offense.

(5)The court, in imposing sentence on a person convicted of a violation or conspiracy to violate—

(

(A)The court, in imposing sentence on a person convicted of a violation of, or conspiracy to violate, section 274(a), 274A(a)(1), or 274A(a)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act or section 555, 1425, 1426, 1427, 1541, 1542, 1543, 1544, or 1546 of this title, or a violation of, or conspiracy to violate, section 1028 of this title if committed in connection with passport or visa issuance or use, shall order that the person forfeit to the United States, regardless of any provision of State law—

(i)

any conveyance, including any vessel, vehicle, or aircraft used in the commission of the offense of which the person is convicted; and

(ii)any property real or personal—

(I)

that constitutes, or is derived from or is traceable to the proceeds obtained directly or indirectly from the commission of the offense of which the person is convicted; or

(II)

that is used to facilitate, or is intended to be used to facilitate, the commission of the offense of which the person is convicted.

(B)

The court, in imposing sentence on a person described in subparagraph (A), shall order that the person forfeit to the United States all property described in that subparagraph.

(7)

The court, in imposing sentence on a person convicted of a Federal health care offense, shall order the person to forfeit property, real or personal, that constitutes or is derived, directly or indirectly, from gross proceeds traceable to the commission of the offense.

(8)The court, in sentencing a defendant convicted of an offense under section 1028, 1029, 1341, 1342, 1343, or 1344, or of a conspiracy to commit such an offense, if the offense involves telemarketing (as that term is defined in section 2325), shall order that the defendant forfeit to the United States any real or personal property—

(A)

used or intended to be used to commit, to facilitate, or to promote the commission of such offense; and

(B)

constituting, derived from, or traceable to the gross proceeds that the defendant obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offense.

direct attacks on civilians, torture, use of prohibited weapons

Crimes against humanity – crimes committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack by or on behalf of a state or an organization against a civilian population during peace or wartime. There are 11 crimes against humanity including murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation or forcible transfer of a population, torture, rape and other serious forms of sexual violence, enforced disappearance and apartheid. Crimes against humanity may be committed in armed conflict or in peacetime.

Genocide – certain acts committed with the intent to destroy, completely or partially, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group. Genocide may be committed in armed conflict or in peacetime.

Warfare is constantly evolving and so are the weapons used in conflict. International humanitarian law expressly forbids the use of weapons that are indiscriminate in nature. Such weapons cannot be used in a manner that distinguishes between civilians and combatants or between civilian objects and military objectives. They are often inaccurate and cause disproportionate damage. International humanitarian law also prohibits the use of weapons that cause superfluous injury and unnecessary suffering,

Weapons which have been banned by specific treaties include:

Chemical weapons
Biological weapons

Whoever, whether inside or outside the United States, commits a war crime, in any of the circumstances described in subsection (b), shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for life or any term of years, or both, and if death results to the victim, shall also be subject to the penalty of death.

(b) Circumstances.-The circumstances referred to in subsection (a) are that the person committing such war crime or the victim of such war crime is a member of the Armed Forces of the United States or a national of the United States (as defined in section 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act).

(1) defined as a grave breach in any of the international conventions signed at Geneva 12 August 1949, or any protocol to such convention to which the United States is a party;

(2) prohibited by Article 23, 25, 27, or 28 of the Annex to the Hague Convention IV, Respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land, signed 18 October 1907;

(3) which constitutes a violation of common Article 3 of the international conventions signed at Geneva, 12 August 1949, or any protocol to such convention to which the United States is a party and which deals with non-international armed conflict; or

(4) of a person who, in relation to an armed conflict and contrary to the provisions of the Protocol on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Mines, Booby-Traps and Other Devices as amended at Geneva on 3 May 1996 (Protocol II as amended on 3 May 1996), when the United States is a party to such Protocol, willfully kills or causes serious injury to civilians.

(Added Pub. L. 104–192, §2(a), Aug. 21, 1996, 110 Stat. 2104 , §2401; renumbered §2441, Pub. L. 104–294, title VI, §605(p)(1), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3510 ; amended Pub. L. 105–118, title V, §583, Nov. 26, 1997, 111 Stat. 2436 .)

References in Text

Section 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, referred to in subsec. (b), is classified to section 1101 of Title 8, Aliens and Nationality.

, VIOLATIONS OF THE NUREMBERG CODE, TERRORISM INVOLVING THE RELEASE OF TOXIC BIOLOGICAL AGENTS- INTENTIONAL RELEASE AND/OR DISSEMINATION OF BIOLOGICAL AGENTS WHICH INCLUDE ONE OR MORE BACTERIA, VIRUSES, INSECTS, FUNGI OR TOXINS IN ONE OR MORE NATURALLY OCCURING OR HUMAN MODIFIED FORM – BIOLOGICAL WARFARE, HOSTAGE TAKING, IMMIGRATION OFFENSES, EXTORTION, EXPLOITATION, DISCRIMINATION, WIRE FRAUD, MAIL FRAUD, ELECTIONS FRAUD, )

GENOCIDE, HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS, WAR CRIMES, VIOLATIONS OF THE NU AND BIOTERRORISIM INVOLVING THE AND CORRUPTION

High ranking officials of the International Bankers And Elites Rule, European Union, World Health Organization, World Economic Foreign, in joint participation with China Xi Jinping, Russia, V. Putin and U.S. Presidents from Jan. 1, 1993 and continuing thru to present including all Heads of State, U.S. Supreme Court Justices(from Jan. 1, 1993 and continuing thru to present)abuse of all U.S. Courts(U.S. Supreme Court, U.S. Court of Appeals

systematic and deep rooted

_______________________________________________________________________________slavery, peon, genocide, neuroigts ___, committed two or more predicate acts, as defined in 18 USC section 1961 obstructed a congressional investigation and continues to ob

On or about ___, 19__, and a number of times since then, plaintiff__ has__ demanded that defendants stop their wrongful conduct described above. Defendants, and each of them, have refused and still refuse to refrain from their wrongful conduct.

wrongful conduct, unless and until enjoined and restrained by order of this court, will cause great and irreparable injury to plaintiff__ in that ___.

Plaintiff__ has__ no adequate remedy at law for the injuries currently being suffered in that ___ (it will be impossible for plaintiff__ to determine the precise amount of damage which __ will suffer if defendants’ conduct is not restrained) (plaintiff will be forced to institute a multiplicity of suits to obtain adeauate compensation for ___ injuries.

As a result of defendants’ wrongful conduct, plaintiff the United States __ has__ been damaged in the sum of $___. Plaintiff__ will be further damaged in like manner so long as defendants’ conduct continues. The full amount of such damage is not now known to plaintiff__, and plaintiff__ will amend this complaint to state such amount when the same becomes known to __, or on proof thereof.

An actual controversy has arisen and now exists between plaintiff and defendant concerning their respective rights and duties in that plaintiff contends ___, whereas defendant disputes these contentions and contends that ___.

Plaintiff desires a judicial determination of ___ rights and duties, and a declaration as to ___.

A judicial declaration is necessary and appropriate at this time under the circumstances in order that plaintiff may ascertain ___ rights and duties ___. (___Allege and financial or other burden now being suffered by unsettled state of affairs)

. (___ Allege detriment and damages incurred if damages sought)

<>. (___ Allege exhaustion of administrative remedies)

CRIMINAL CLASS ACTIONS -PROSECUTION ALL CONSPIRED TO DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES OUT OF MONEY AND/OR PROPERTY AND THE UNITED STATES IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 371____________________and all of their respective successors in interest, Predecessors, Representatives, trustees, executors, administrators, heirs, assign or transferees, immediate and remote, any person or entity acting on behalf of or claiming under any of them and each of them

19. Plaintiffs’ claims are typical of the claims of other members of the class, who are subject to the same deprivations of their rights by defendants as hereinafter alleged.

20. There are questions of law and fact common to all members of the class.

21. The prosecution of separate actions by individual members of the class would be impracticable because:

(a) Inconsistent adjudications regarding individual members of the class would establish incompatible standards of conduct for defendants, whose actions and threatened actions apply generally to any and all members of the class; and

(b) Adjudications with respect to individual members of the class would be dispositive of the interests of other members not parties to the suits, since defendants’ actions and threatened actions apply generally to any and all members of the class.

22. Defendants have acted or threatened to act on grounds generally applicable to all members of the class, thereby making appropriate final injunctive relief with respect to the class as a whole.

Rule 23(b)(2)

Finally, a class action is maintainable under Rule 23(b)(2) if “the party opposing the class acted or refused to act on grounds generally applicable to the class, thereby making appropriate final injunctive relief or corresponding declaratory relief with respect to the class as a whole.” This subdivision of Rule 23(b) is the one which applies most directly to the present case.

23. Questions of law or fact common to the members of the class predominate over any questions affecting only individual members, and a class action is superior to other available methods for the fair and efficient adjudication of the controversy, inasmuch as the individual members are deprived of essentially the same rights by defendants’ actions and threatened actions, and differ only in collateral aspects of their factual situation.

This case was tried without a jury.(RETROACTIVE IMPLICATION FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUNING TO PRESENT-SEE BELOW INTERVENTION IN THE IN COMPLAINT IN A LAWFUL “ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME COURT OF LAW[PURSUANT TO ADMIRALTY AND MARITIME LAW “COMMON LAW”- THEIR IS NO RIGHT TO A JURY)

This case has ripened beyond an abstract question into an actual controversy and that is otherwise within its Universal and Extraterritorial jurisdiction(the legal authority of the United States to prosecute criminal conduct that took place outside its borders – EXTRADICTION OF FOREIGN DEFENDANTS). and as follow . This cause heard by THE 50 STTES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR PLAINTIFF/CLAIMANT in the above entitled action, for declaratory and/or summary adjudicificaiton and primary injunction,, and on the affidavit and verified complaint of Sharon Bridgewater( SEE RETROACTIVE INTERVENTION IN SAN FRANCISCO SUPER, – “ADMIRALTY AND/OR MARITIME CLAIM” BREACH OF CONTRACT, GROSS NEGLIENCE AND FRAUD) APPEARANCE AS COUNCIL FOR THE PEOPLE OF THE 50 STATES, DECLARATORY ADJUDICATION trial court applied the right standard and found the facts necessary to support the “DEFAULT JUDGMENT IN REM” the following facts are critical:

a valid and enforceable contract existed;
the plaintiff performed or tendered performance;
the defendant breached the contract; and
the breach caused the plaintiff’s injury.

“RETROACTIVE DECLARATORY ADJUDICATION, CRIMINAL JUDGMENT AND CONVICTION FROM AUGUST 2008 KAMALA HARRIS IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR SAN FRANCISCO(ADJUDICATED GULITY OF CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD THE U.S. A. AND THE TWO WITNESSES AND MULITPLE OTHER CRIMES, ADOPTED THE ACTS OF HAYES VALLEY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP(ADJUICATED GUILTY OF RACKETEERING OF SEVEN OR MORE PREDICATE ACTS, WIRE FRAUD, MAIL FRAUD, EXTORTION UNDER THE COLOR OF OFFICIAL AUTHORITY, PERJURY, FALSE DECLARATIONS, ___________________)CALIFORNIA, MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL ACTS OR OMISSIONS AND SCHEME TO DEFRAUD SHARON & JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER – CLICK HERE-

NOTICE OF DECLARATORY ADJUDICATION, “RETROACTIVE IMPLICATION(JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUNG THRU TO PRESENT) THAT ALL JUDGMENT ORDERS, BY THE EUROPEAN UNION(TO ATTEMPT TO PREVENT THE ARREST, DETAINMENT AND CAPITOL PUNISHMENT OF “COVID PERPETRATORS” INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: https://travel-europe.europa.eu/etias/who-should-apply_en#ETIAS-countries ARE NULL AND VOID AND WITHOUT ANY LEGAL EFFECT – SEE RETROACTIVE DECLARATORY ADJUDICATION(BELOW)

commonlawpowers Download

References in Text

Share this: