GEORGE H. BUSH IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS UNITED STATES PRESIDENT[PUPPET FOR JACOB ROTHCHILD ET AL “THE GLOBAL ELITE”](AND THOSE OPERATING UNDER HIS DIRECTION INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WILLIAM BARR U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL) JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUNING THRU TO CLINTON TERM(AND BUSH’S PRIOR “OVERT” ACT VIA THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION AND THE BIOWEAPON’S TERRORIST ACT WHICH GAVE RISE TO TODAY’S COV-19 PANDEMIC AND BIDEN’S & THE WHO CONSPIRACY AS FOLLOWS:

THE CONTROVERSY!!

PROPERTY IN DISPUTE, 125 TRILLION DOLLARS, ON OR ABACT IN JOINT PARTICIPATION WITH BIDEN, TRUMP, GRANT U.S.A. SOVERIGNTY TO CHINA, FAIL TO PROTECT BORDER, ADVOCATE TO OVERTHROW THE U.S. GOVERNMENT AND/OR “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR” BY VIOLENCE, OPPRESSION, CONSPIRACY TO DEPRIVE RIGHTS AS DEFINED IN 18 U.S.C. SECTION 241 AND/OR 18 U.S.C. SECTION 242, DEFRAUD THE U.S.A. IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 371, EXPLOIT, COMMIT FRAUD ON THE COURT AND DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES OUT OF MONEY AND/OR PROPERTY IS INELIGIBLE TO HOLD OFFICE AS THE UNITED STATES PRESIDENT FOR RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY, TREASON AND CONSPIRACY WITH DONALD TRUMP TO DEFRAUD TWO WITNESSES AND/OR REBELLION AND INSURRECTION – JAN. 6, 2021 CAPITOL ATTACKS

OBAMA TELL PEOPLE THEY MUST SUBMIT TO THE ONE WORLD ORDER AND/OR SURRENDER THEIR RIGHTS TO AS FOLLOWS:

OBAMA ACTS OR OMISSION CONSTITUTE TREASON AND HE IS “RETRO-ACTIVITY IMPEACHED” AND/OR REMOVED FROM OFFICE, ALL EXECUTIVE ORDER ETC. INCLUDING OBAMA CARE, MILITARY DETAINMENT OF U.S. CITIZENS WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW “RFID CHIPPING THE GENERAL PUBLIC” IS NULL AND VOID AND WITHOUT ANY LEGAL EFFECT. ALL DISMISSED LAWSUITS INVOLVING HIS BIRTH CERTIFICATE IS NULL AND VOID, IT IS DECLARED OBAMA IS NOT A U.S. CITIZEN, AND WAS NOT ELIGIBLE TO HOLD OFFICE AS THE U.S. PRESIDENT

,  

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S. Code § 2383 – Rebellion or insurrection,

Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

BIDEN, HARRIS, TRUMP, U.S. SENATORS ET AL ARE GUILTY FOR THE ACTS OR OMISSIONS, ONE OR MORE GUILTY OF “CONSPIRACY, COMPLICITY, AIDING AND ABETTING TRUMP,” TO DEFRAUD BOTH SHARON AND JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER(FORMER REAL ESTATE BROKER AND/OR BUSINESS OWNER(S) REBELLION OR INSURRECTION FOR FAILING TO PROSECUTE TRUMP AND ARE INCAPABLE OF HOLD “ANY OFFICE UNDER THE UNITED STATES!! ”

PURSUANT TO MY DUTY AS A U.S. CITIZEN AND PURSUANT TO THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE(TO FORM A NEW GOVERNMENT PURSANT TO THE DECLARATION OF INDENDENCE VIA BIDEN, HARRIS, TRUMP, U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES TREASON, CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT GENOCIDE ON U.S. CITIZENS ETC.

THE 50 UNITED STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR VS. INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT PROSECUTOR KARIM A.A. KHAN MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL( AND PREDESSCORS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO HIS TERM, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ALL ACTING ATTORNEY GENERALS, ALL STATE ATTORNEY GENERALS, DISTRICT PROSECUTORS, ALL ACTING ATTORNEY GENERALS, ALL APPOINTED SPECIAL PROSECUTORS ET AL)

COMES NOW “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR APPEARS BEFORE THIS COURT TO DECLARE THE LEGAL RELATION BETWEEN FIRST MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY(FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT)AS ONE OR MORE CHIEF JUDGE FOR D.C. CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS AND/OR U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE, AND THE RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF THE PARTIES, FOR THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL ONE OR MORE JOE BIDEN IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITIES FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT(AND PREDESSCORS FOR JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT), KAMALA HARRIS, legal relationship between parties and their rights in a matter before the court.  

“RIGHTS AND DUTIES OF THE PARTIES AND DECLARATORY JUDGMENT

“THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER VS. KAMALA HARRIS

IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DISTRICT ATTORNEY” FOR SAN FRANCISCO, CA. 2008 AND CONTINUING THRU PRESENT

The role of the United States Attorney is to: (1) prosecute criminal cases brought by the federal government; (2) prosecute or defend civil cases where the United States is a party; and (3) collect debts owed to the federal government when administrative agencies are unable to do so and responsible for the prosecution of violations of federal law(and U.S. State Attorney(s) – as in Kamala Harris – District Attorney for San Francisco, California, role is to prosecute Criminals for State crimes.

The role of the international criminal court Prosecutor is to examine situations and/or complaints under the jurisdiction of the Court where genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and aggression appear to have been committed, and carrying out investigations and prosecutions against the individuals who are allegedly most responsible for those crimes. 

CONTENDS CONSPIRE WITH ONE OR MORE JACOB ROTHCHILD, MAJOR CORPORATIONS AND/OR DONALD TRUMP, DEFRAUD THE TWO WITNESSES, EXPLOIT, COMMIT FRAUD ON THE COURT, WIRE FRAUD, ENGAGE IN A PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY AND/OR THE U.S.A. IT’S DEPARTMENT AND AGENCIES, ACT IN JOINT PARTICIPATION WITH CHINA AND RUSSIA, “ONE WORLD COMMUNIST COUNTRY” USE TRICK, SCHEME, “LIE” TO THE PUBLIC ABOUT THE COV-19 INJECTION, PREDICTIVE POLICING, ENSLAVE UNDER CHINA, ENSLAVE U.S. CITIZENS AND OBTAIN 125 TRILLION DOLLARS, COMMIT GENOCIDE VIOLATION OF THE NUMBERBERG CODE,

KAMALA HARRIS, BIDEN, ISSUE VOID ORDER, COMMIT FRAUD ON THE COURT, COMMIT WIRE FRAUD, “JUDICIAL RACKETEERING” UPURP PUBLIC OFFICE, DISCRIMINATE AGAINST BOTH SHARON AND JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER DENY AND/OR DEPRIVE BOTH ET AL UPURP THE OFFICE OF THE U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL TO FUTHER DEFRAUD BOTH WITNESSES SHARON AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER ENGAGE IN A PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY, CONSPIRE TO COMMIT AND/OR VIOLATE THE RICO ACT,  COMMIT MULTIPLE CRIMES IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C SECTION(S) 215, 656, 657, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1014, 1341, 1343, or 1344 of this title, affecting a financial institution, or 18 USC SECTION(S) 471, 472, 473, 474, 476, 477, 478, 479, 480, 481, 485, 486, 487, 488, 501, 502, 510, 542, 545, 555, 842, 844, 1028, 1029, or 1030 AND/OR TWO OR MORE 18 USC 666(a)(1) (relating to Federal program fraud); 18 USC 1001 (relating to fraud and false statements); 18 U.S.C SECTION 1031major fraud against the United States); 18 USC section 1032 (relating to concealment of assets from conservator, receiver, or liquidating agent of insured financial institution); 18 USC section 1341 (relating to mail fraud); or section 1343 (relating to wire fraud),involving the sale of assets acquired or held by the the [1] Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as conservator or receiver for a financial institution or any other conservator for a financial institution appointed by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, or the National Credit Union Administration, as conservator or liquidating agent for a financial institution, shall order that the person forfeit to the United States any property, real or personal, which represents or is traceable to the gross receipts obtained, directly or indirectly, as a result of such violation.

(4)

WHERE AS BRIDGEWATER CONTENDS THAT THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE IS We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights …Declaration of Independence guarantees the right to “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.”U.S. Constitutional rights, SHE AND HUMANITY U.S. IS A SOVERIGN COUNTRY, WITH FREEDOMS, RIGHTS, AND THE BIDEN, HARRIS, BIO

First: The existence of an enterprise;
Second: That the enterprise was engaged in or its activities affected interstate
or foreign commerce;
Third: That (name) was employed by or associated with that enterprise;
Fourth: That (name) knowingly conducted that enterprise’s affairs or that
(name) knowingly participated, directly or indirectly, in the conduct of that
enterprise’s affairs; and
Fifth: That (name) knowingly (conducted) (participated, directly or indirectly,
in the conduct of) that enterprise’s affairs through (a pattern of racketeering
activity) (the collection of an unlawful debt), as alleged in the indictment.

With respect to an offense listed in subsection (a)(3) committed for the purpose of executing or attempting to execute any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent statements, pretenses, representations, or promises, the gross receipts of such an offense shall include any property, real or personal, tangible or intangible, which is obtained, directly or indirectly, as a result of such offense.

of this title,shall order that the person forfeit to the United States any property constituting, or derived from, proceeds the person obtained directly or indirectly, as the result of such violation.

The court, in imposing sentence on a person convicted of a Federal health care offense, shall order the person to forfeit property, real or personal, that constitutes or is derived, directly or indirectly, from gross proceeds traceable to the commission of the offense.

(8)The court, in sentencing a defendant convicted of an offense under section 1028, 1029, 1341, 1342, 1343, or 1344, or of a conspiracy to commit such an offense, if the offense involves telemarketing (as that term is defined in section 2325), shall order that the defendant forfeit to the United States any real or personal property—

(A)

used or intended to be used to commit, to facilitate, or to promote the commission of such offense; and

(B)

constituting, derived from, or traceable to the gross proceeds that the defendant obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the offense.

(b)

(1)

The forfeiture of property under this section, including any seizure and disposition of the property and any related judicial or administrative proceeding, shall be governed by the provisions of section 413 (other than subsection (d) of that section) of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970 (21 U.S.C. 853).

(2)

KNOWINGLY, LIED TO THE AMERICAN PUBLIC AND HUMANITY FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE TO SCAR PEOPLE TO RECEIVE THE “NANO-TECH SENSOR – UNDER SKIN SURVIELLENCE” CONTROL – DEATH VAX TO DEPOPULATE

A declaratory judgment is a court-issued judgment that defines and outlines the rights and obligations of each party in a contract. Declaratory judgments have the same effect and force as final judgments and are legally binding. These judgments are also called a declaration or declaratory relief.  THIS CASE IS RIPE!!

DECLARATORY JUDGMENT

IT IS SO ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED

   1)That this “COMMON LAW COURT”court adjudge and decree and declare that the rights and legal relations of the parties      to the  subject matter here in controversy, in order that the declaration shall have the force and effect of a final judgment and decree.

2)  That the court enters a judgment declaring that Plaintiff is fully vested with the right to prosecute, via the Private Attorney General Statue (RICO) and/or collect and/or recover fines et al on behalf of the THE 50 STATES IN VIOLATION OF 18 USC SECTION 371.

3) That the court enter judgment declaring the Barak H.Obama(AKA Barry Soertoes) and/or “et als,” can not exert executive privilege.

4) That the court enter judgment declaring the “The United States ex rel Sharon Bridgewater Private Attorney General and/OR Relator(Claimant et al )is fully  vested with the right to have a writ of quo warranto issued upon Loretta Lynch in her official capacity as United States Attorney General.

5) That this court adjudge and decree that Lynch violated the “The United States ex rel Sharon Bridgewater Private Attorney General and/Relator(Claimant et al )class Plaintiff second amendment rights are liable to the Plaintiff for damages.

6) That this court adjudge and decree that the “The United States ex rel Sharon Bridgewater Private Attorney General and/or Relator(Claimant et al )has absolute right to  claim her personal and business property that were illegally stolen and taken without due process of law.

7) That this court adjudge that Loretta Lynch is disqualified to prosecute  Hillary Clinton e-mail as United States Attorney General or her appointment constitute conflict of interest

8) That this court adjudge and decree that the Plaintiff Bridgewater has absolute right to claim her personal and business that this court a

10) Prejudgment writs of attachment for the United States of America and the class Plaintiffs in the amount of $150,000,000,000 Trillion Dollars.

 11) THAT ALL U.S. GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS(IN THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH, LEGISLATIVE BRANCH, AND/OR JUDICIAL BRANCH ARE ARE DISQUALIFIED FROM ANY PROCEEDING

 12)Sharon Bridgewater is Prosecutor for the 50 States and/or the People of the 50 States and all U.S. Government Employees and/or U.S. State Attorney General are are employed and by a “Racketeering Enterprize in violation of 18 U.S.C. section 196

 13) Declaratory Judgment for the United States and as alleged in cause number III.

 14) Temporary restraining order enjoin

 15) FILE THE ATTACHED EXH. A, B, C AND D

 16) Permit Plaintiff to file a first amended consolidate complaint in intervention to more fully ____________for de-novo review and within 60 days as permitted by law.

1)IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREEDcourt adjudge and decree and declare that the rights and legal relations of the parties      to the  subject matter here in controversy, in order that the declaration shall have the force and effect of a final judgment and decree.

2)  That the court enters a judgment declaring that Plaintiff is fully vested with the right to prosecute, via the Private Attorney General Statue (RICO) and/or collect and/or recover fines et al on behalf of the United States Government the Federal False Claims Act.

3) That the court enter judgment declaring the Barak H.Obama(AKA Barry Soertoes) and/or “et als,” can not exert executive privilege.

4) That the court enter judgment declaring the “The United States ex rel Sharon Bridgewater Private Attorney General and/or Relator(Claimant et al )is fully  vested with the right to have a writ of quo warranto issued upon Loretta Lynch in her official capacity as United States Attorney General.

5) That this court adjudge and decree that Lynch violated the “The United States ex rel Sharon Bridgewater Private Attorney General and/or Qui Tam Relator(Claimant et al )class Plaintiff second amendment rights are liable to the Plaintiff for damages in the amount of $10,000.00.

6) That this court adjudge and decree that the “The United States ex rel Sharon Bridgewater Private Attorney General and/or Qui Tam Relator(Claimant et al )has absolute right to  claim her personal and business property that were illegally stolen and taken without due process of law.

7) That this court adjudge that Loretta Lynch is disqualified to prosecute  Hillary Clinton e-mail as United States Attorney General or her appointment constitute conflict of interest

8) That this court adjudge and decree that the Plaintiff Bridgewater has absolute right to claim her personal and business that this court a

9) Because the Class Plaintiff can not sue an public official in excess of $10,000 pursuant to the enter  partial  judgment for “The United States ex rel Sharon Bridgewater Private Attorney General and/or Relator(Claimant et al )”Class Plaintiff Sharon Bridgewater judgment against Loretta Lynch  and to deliver this partial payment at the Plaintiffs post office box.

10) Prejudgment writs of attachment for the United States of America and the class Plaintiffs in the amount of $150,000,000,000 Trillion Dollars.

 11) Consolidate the hearing with the petition for Habeas Corpus

 12) THAT “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER IS PROSECUTOR

 13) Declaratory Judgment for the United States and as alleged in cause number III.

 14) Temporary restraining order enjoin

 15) FILE THE ATTACHED EXH. A, B, C AND D

 16) Permit Plaintiff to file a first amended consolidate complaint in intervention to more fully ____________for de-novo review and within 60 days as permitted by law.

The Defendant demand Judgment and claim _________against Loretta Lynch in personam Plaintiff (DOJ, ATF, Barak H. Obama et al)for claim

AMOUNT DUE 125 TRILLION ______________________________________________________________________________

AMOUNT PAID: ZERO

RETROACTIVE IMPEACHMENT OF WILLIAM BARR

RETROACTIVE FORFEITURE OF OFFICE HERE