FRONT PAGE CONTENT #8

has___ been generally damaged in the sum of $____.

2) in deliberate ignorance; or

(3) in reckless disregard and submitted claims to the US Treasury for the years of 2010(3.4 Trillion), 2011(3.6 Trillion), 2012(3.5 Trillion), 2013(3.4 Trillion), 2014(3.5 Trillion), 2015(3.6 Trillion) 2016(3.9 Trillion), AND 2017(4.1 Trillion)(US budget for these years can be verfied at www:_____________)which constitute a false claims under the Federal False Claims act, in the amount of $84,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00(EIGHTY FOUR TRILLION DOLLARS)that such claims are false, and are liable under the False Claims Act therefor. By virtue of these acts Obama _____as representative on behalf of class ____________ in the amount of $_______________, the amount is due and now owing. Wherefore the Plaintiff request judgment in the amount of $_________________and writs of attachments.

CLAIM IV

BREACH OF CONTRACT AGAINST THE PUBLIC/PRIVATE “TRANSNATIONAL”

By reason of defendant Loretta Lynch breach of said contract and/or negligence as herein alleged, the plaintiff “the United States et al and/or the “Class Petitioner Representative Bridgewater and/or Class Member has suffered damages in the sum of not less than and not less than 100,000,000,000,000,000(One Hunred Trillion Dollars-class Defendants).

By the terms of said written agreement, the Plaintiff is entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees incurred in the enforcement of the provisions of the agreement. By reason of the aforementioned breach of the defendant Loretta Lynch, the Plaintiff has been forced to “ACT AS PROSECUTOR, TO DEFEND FOR THE UNITED STATES, ET AL,” to collect fines, etc. ) and to recover money and/or property on behalf of the “ United 50 States et al.” Further on or about Nov. 15, 2015 and continuing thru present the Petitioner has sent Loretta Lynch “duly authorized, first class certified mail,” and a number of times since then, plaintiff Bridgewater has demanded Loretta Lynch in her official capacity to stop her wrongful conduct described above. Defendants Loretta Lynch as the United States Attorney General et al , and each of them, have refused and still refuse to refrain from their wrongful conduct.

Defendants Loretta Lynch in her official capacity unless and until enjoined and restrained by order of this court, will cause great and irreparable injury to “the United States et al ,” in that “the United 50 States and/or the Plaintiff will suffer and continue to suffer from deprivation of property and/or money without due process of law in violaton of the United Constitution and/or International laws and treaties.The enterprise “federal officials” joint participation has changed, or altered the movement or ransportation or flow of goods, merchandise, money, or other property between or mong two or more states (between a state and a foreign country).Nature of Trade and Commerce; Real Estate .Holder acted or refused to act on ground generally applicable to the Class

By the aforesaid acts and omissions Defendants caused the damage and _____The United States performed all of its contractual obligations pertaining to the payment via the job of the United States President and/or the United States Attorney General “all officer shall uphold the United States Constitution, ___________faithfully ________, Loretta Lynch prosecute

As a result of the aforesaid acts and omissions, Defendants breached its contractual obligation by failing to perform work as the United States President and the United Statea Attorney General., as a consequence of which the United States is entitled to money damaged in the amount ________

<>. On or about ___, 19__, in the City of ___, County of ___, State of California, Plaintiff and defendant entered into a written agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and made a part hereof. By the terms of said written agreement, ___.

The consideration set forth in the agreement was the fair and reasonable.Plaintiff has performed all conditions, covenants, and promises required by him on his part to be performed in accordance with the terms and conditions of the contract.On or about ___, 19__ the defendant__ breached the said agreement by _____. By reason of defendant__ breach of said contract as herein alleged, the plaintiff__ has__ suffered damages in the sum of $__.By the terms of said written agreement, the Plaintiff is entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees incurred in the enforcement of the provisions of the agreement. By reason of the aforementioned breach of the defendant, the Plaintiff has been forced to “ACT AS PROSECUTOR AND ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE 50 STATES.” WHEREFORE, plaintiff__ pray__ judgment against defendant__ and each of them, as follows:

For compensatory damages in the sum of $___; For interest on the sum of $___ from and after ___, 19__ to date of judgment;For reasonable attorney fees according to proof; For costs of suit herein incurred; and For such other and further relief as the court may deem proper, writs of attachment, arrest warrants,

VIOLATION OF 2ND AMENDMENT RIGHT

BUSH, OBAMA AND HOLDER KNOWINGLY, INTENTIONALLY CAME ON TO MY PREMISES, ARRESTED MY WITHOUT PROBABLE CAUSE STOLE MY GUN AND BUSINESS COMPUTER AND PAPERS, CHARGE ME WITH THEFT BY TAKING AND CONSPIRED WITH JUDGES TO DISMISS EACH AND EVERY ONE OF THE COMPLAINTS I FILED

Current law prohibits individuals from buying a gun if, because of a mental health issue, they are either a danger to themselves or others or are unable to manage their own affairs. The Social Security Administration (SSA) has indicated that it will begin the rulemaking process to ensure that appropriate information in its records is reported to NICS. The reporting that SSA, in consultation with the Department of Justice, records of the approximately 75,000 people each year who have a documented mental health issue, receive disability benefits, federal prohibition on possessing a firearm for reasons related to mental health. There are many disabled people who are receive checks on behalf of disabled people.

Obama and/or Loretta Lynch conspired under the color of law, breached her duties and/or legal obligations as United States Attorney General, violated her oath of office and further violated the class Plaintiff Second Amendment rights to bear arms a committed a number of other overt acts requiring injunctive relief.

As a direct and proximate consequence of the Defendants’ actions, Plaintiffs were deprived of certain rights, privileges and immunities secured by the Constitution of the United States of America(Human rights via the Universal Declaration International laws and treaties) the laws of this Nation and the “50 States.” and the Class Plaintiffs 2^nd amendment’ Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment rights to procedural and/or substantive due process and equal protection of the laws were violated by the Defendants, together with their Eighth Amendment right proscribing cruel and unusual punishment and their Fourth Amendment right to be free of unreasonable searches and seizures, as well as their First Amendment right to free speech and expression. The Class Plaintiff and/or the Class members lost their ability to earn a living due to the above Defendants conspiracies, conspiracies to defraud the Plaintiffs out of money or property, violence against the Plaintiffs(WOMEN minority business owners), oppression, unfair business practices, unfair competition, conspiracies to restrain commerce, acts of threats, extortion, coercion, force, assault and battery, usurpation of business(is)The Specialty Investment Group LLC dissolved in Sept. 2010, due to the “repeated” conspiracies and/or unlawful attacks to restrain commerce, unfair competition, unfair business practices, repeated, continual violation of the Specialty Investment Group LLC and/or the Plaintiff’s United States Constitutional violations civil rights by the above named Defendants. illegal overt acts by the United States Government the Plaintiff has direct and/or indirectly proximate cause of the Plaintiff’s mental and emotional instability and social security, oppression, deprivation of business and personal property, theft, and anti-competitive conduct of one or more of the Defendants of which conduct, which violates both federal antitrust laws. The United States has been damaged and injured by the overt acts of the Defendants.

I have been unable to drive a car, work, make a living due to the repeated conspiracies of the Defendants. My son is currently on probation, via “threat,” coercion and/or force and is “forced” to pay $800.00 for crimes he did not commit(via concealment and/or acts or omissions of Barak H. Obama and/or Lynch).

CLAIM II

LIBEL

THE ELEMENTS OF LIBEL

Name and legal description of court before which is brought.
Name and legal description of Libellant and any offer or function or relationship the libellant may hold it the regret to sustain that action depends upon it, as if he be foreigner claim man any particular ground or him eecitopm guardian which act [tocotu he may he/she may be sued\end at home; or if the libellant be a married women or women with separate personal rights.
The name and legal description of the person soar the thing against when or which the suit is brought.
The nature of the cause as that it is civil or maritime contract, or tort or dame or of possession, or otherwise as the case may be and if the libel is in rem, the property is with the district, and if the persona the name and occupation and palaces of resident of the parties.
The facts upon which the suit is brought.
That the premises to be within the admiralty and maritime jurisdiction of the United States Courts
The prayer for the remedies which is situated to the case.
The prayer for relief or remedy which the libellant seeks by the suit, and which the court is competent to give.
The process prayed for may be a war of arrest the person of the Defendant in nature of a capital or warrant of arrest with a clause therein, if the Defendant can be found his/her goods and chattels to the amount sue for; or if such an not be found, to attach is credits and effects to the amount sued for in the hands of the garnishees named therein; or an single moment in in nature of a summons to appear and answer to the suit.

Plaintiff brings this case action on behalf of all African Americans, minorities from 1993 and continuing thru present who purchased a vehicle and displayed “drive out tag” as a license plate until they are able to obtain a license plate from the Department of Motor Vehicle and/or Secretary of State and who were pulled over a vehicle who were driving their cars and “pulled over,” and questioned by the police, received a traffic ticket.

Plaintiff brings this case action on behalf of all African Americans, minorities from 1993 and continuing thru present who lived in cities Major cities throughout the United States(Atlanta, Los Angeles, New York, Detroit, Chicago, i.e.)__________________________were assaulted, beaten, arrested, humiliated, falsely imprisonment, maliciously prosecuted without probable cause on the sole account based on race, class, gender, ethnicity, disability, national origin, and by Police Officers on the sole account of race, _____________

During all of the times referred to, Defendant Loretta Lynch (and Processors from 1993 and continuing thru to her term) is a Law Enforcement Officer, and were “Does 2001 thru 1, 000, 000, 000, 000,” police officers stationed at various Police States and members of the Police Department of “cities,” of “the United States.”

The “Class Representative,” and Plaintiff Sharon Bridgewater son James S. Bridgewater , now 33 years of age, is, and at all times mentioned was a Citizen of the United States locations throughout the United States, and a resident of Michigan, and of the Eastern District of Michigan.

Plaintiff was arrested by Defendant _____________________on _________, at___time, and at the Redford Police Department.

The arrest was made without a warrant and the charge was for “Lying to a Police Officer.”

Concealed

The “Class Representative,” and Plaintiff Bridgewater, now 54 years of age, is, and at all times mentioned was a Citizen of the United States locations throughout the United States, and a resident of Michigan, and of the Eastern District of Michigan.

Plaintiff was arrested by Defendant _____________________on _________, at___time, and taken to the Washtenaw County Police Station concerning an alleged “driving ____________________. All arrest were made without a warrant. During one two or more arrest numerous articles of personal and business property were seized by the arresting officers without a warrant and not returned. Despite the “repeated,” “continual,” plea of the Class Plaintiff to return her business or personal property. Plaintiff remained and continues to remain in police custody via “one or more outstanding warrants, “and is unlawful held in violation of the United States Constititituion on the account she is a “Whistleblower, “ and/or federal witness and victim of Racketeering .

At _______time___on _____date, Plaintiff was again on the same charge set forth in paragraph 4 by the Defendant____and other police officers, wrongfully imprisioned, with out a warrant and contrary to the United States Constitution and/or the “50State Statues.” Plaintiff and Class members were taken to the scene of the alleged crime and there questioned by some of the Defendant and {set out acts] of the Defendant by reason of which playoffs was coerced. Plaintiff and Class members was promised medical aid if he/she would sign a confession and was promised that the beatings would cease. Plaintiff then initialed some paper and the beatings ceased. Uniteder compulsion of the beatings and threats previously described and desiring immediate medical aid, the Plaintiff was compelled to testify against him/herself by signing a stating admitting the burglary or some other crime.

Defendants beat plaintiff for the purpose of forcing he/her to make a confession and for the purpose of imposing illegal summary punishment on him/her. Defendant was held incommunicado for a period of over various hours 1-72 hours and the Defendants refused to permit Plaintiff attorney to see or consult with him or her client, the Plaintiff. As a result of the beatings by the Defendant [describe injuries], all in violation of the laws of the United States, as more particularly set for later. The action of Defendants were under color of law.

Title 42 USC section 1985(2) provides in part as follows:” If two or more persons conspire for the purpose of impeding, hindering, obstructing, or defeating in any manner, the due course of justice in any State or Territory, with intent to deny to any citizen the equal protection of the law, or to injure him or his property for lawfully enforcing or attempting to enforce, the right of any person or class of persons, to the equal protection of the laws,”

Subparagraph(3) of the same Section provides as follows: in any case of conspiracy set forth in this section, if one or more persons engaged in conspiracy do, or cause to be done any act in furtherance of the object of the conspiracy, by which another is injured in his person or property, or deprived of having and excising any right or privilege of a citizen of the United States, the party so injured or deprived may have deprivation, against any one or more of the conspirators.”

From Jan. . . .1, 1993 and continuing thru present in the City of _____________Northen District of Georgia, the Defendants entered into a conspiracy with each other, and with other parties whose names are unknown to the Plaintiff, for the purpose of impeding, hindering, obstructing or defeating the due course of justice in the State of Michigan and/or other States with intent to deny the Plaintiff equal protection of the laws and with intent to injure his/her lawfully enforcing or attemptiming to enforce her right to equal protection o f the laws in that the Defendant, pursuant ot the conspiracy caused the Plaintiff to be unlawfully arrested; caused the institution, and continuation thru to present of malicious prosecution agains the Plaintiff; gave and caused to be given perjured testismony resulting in the return of an indictment in the 14A Judicial District Court for the State of Michigan and subsequently warrants and/or wrongful conviction of Plaintiff causing Plaintiff to be falsely imprisioned since Sept. 2007. Which incarceration resulted in loss wages to h___as ______over $__________; persisted in uttering perjured and false testimony in the hearing on numerous habeas corpus and post-conviction petitions filed by plaintiff and heard during _____,_______and______; over_______petitions were filed during the period; the persistence continuing even after the ___Supreme Court affirmed the granting of a new trial to Plaintiff in the return of their mandate to the ___court of _on __date; caused duress and fear of retribution to be exercised on the Plaintiff up to and including____date. Pursuant to the conspiracy, Defendants seriously injured Plaintiff and caused her, by force and violence, to testify against herself by means of a wrongfully obtained confession, with respect to charges against him of which Plaintiff was innocent and which charges constituted a crime under the laws of the state of ______. As a result of the wrongful conduct of the Defendants, carried out under color of law, the Plaintiff was deprived of his/her constitutional rights secured to him/her by the Fourteenth Amndmentot the Untied States Cosntitution. The conspiracy continues to this present date.

In furtherance of the objectives of the conspiracy referred to in the proceding paragraph, the Defendant either did, or cause to be done, the following overt acts: set out the illegal acts

Unconstitutional Traffic Stops
D
D
E
C
C

The acts which Defendants did or caused to be done in furtherance of the conspiracy referred to and described in the preceding paragraphs, injured the body of the Plaintiff permanently and has caused him/her extreme paind and suffering which still continues.

On or about August 2008 and continuing thru present the Plaintiff claimed an interest in the “Office of the United States Attorney General.”

On or about Nov. 1, 2007, Public Officers illegally unlawfully deprived and caused injury

On or about Nov. and continuing thru repeatedly requested the return of her office and business(computer, gun________________)and deprived and/or deprived the Plaintiff equal protection under the law and/or equal privilege and violated the

by filing multiple complaints against Barak H. Obama and/or Eric Holder alleging libel, peonage, slavery, human rights violation and/or RICO violations

Caused one or more indictment, grand jury in violation of ________.

On or about Nov. 2007 and continuing thru present Eric Holder(and those operating under his direction) published and/or posted defamatory information on the DOJ website and/or in the NCIC crime data base that the Class Claimant had been convicted and/or arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol; theft by taking; and further posted mug shots, warrants for arrest and an defamatory posting of an “ARMED AND DANGEROUS,” in the Department of Justice data base[nation wide], [1] without probable cause.

The entire statement and/or posting is false as it pertains to the Class Plaintiff Bridgewater.

The described publication and/or posting on the Department of Justice website and data bases are libelous on its face. It clearly expose Plaintiff to hatred, contempt, ridicule and oblguy, because a “ARMED AND DANGEROUS” posting is clearly a posting for “mass murders or extremely dangerous persons such as terrorist or rapist; and charges the Class Plaintiff with having committed a serious crime of murder, rape, etc. [2]

10.. As a proximate result of the above the Plaintiff has suffered lost of reputation, low self esteem, shame, mortification, injury to all to her damage in excess of $100,000,000,000,000.00.

The above describe publication is not privileged because it was published or posted by Defendant Eric Holder in the Department of Justice and upon information and belief with the state of mind of malice, hatred and/or ill will toward the Plaintiff and without probable cause and upon information and belief in retaliation “only because the Plaintiff was the victim of Racketeering (Federal Witness),” and the will to punish the Plaintiff for asserting her legal rights. On or about April 24, 2015, Loretta Lynch (and Barak H.Obama-2009 and continuing thru present) entered into an agreement (express or implied) with the United States Government to faithfully execute duties, and to uphold the United States Constitution._______see

In accord with the provision of the agreement,the Plaintiff (the United States Government) paid Loretta Lynch (and Obama et al) a weekly salary of ________________upon the performance of _____________duties, and to uphold the United States Constitution. Loretta Lynch knew or should have known that such _________is discriminatory, violates the Class Plaintiff civil rights, . Loretta Lynch breached her upon information and belief knowingly, intentionally violated the Plaintiff Civil rights.

Defendant Loretta Lynch and Barry Soetoes and each of the did the acts and things herein alleged pursuant to, and in furtherance of the conspiracy, in that on or about SOn or about Nov. 2007 and continuing thru present Eric Holder(and those operating under his direction) published and/or posted defamatory information on the DOJ website and/or in the NCIC crime data base that the Class Claimant had been convicted and/or arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol; theft by taking; and further posted mug shots, warrants for arrest and an defamatory posting of an “ARMED AND DANGEROUS,” in the Department of Justice data base[nation wide], without probable cause.

The entire statement and/or posting is false as it pertains to the Class Plaintiff Bridgewater.

The described publication and/or posting on the Department of Justice website and data bases are libelous on its face. It clearly expose Plaintiff to hatred, contempt, ridicule and oblguy, because a “ARMED AND DANGEROUS” posting is clearly a posting for “mass murders or extremely dangerous people such as terrorist or rapist(BOTH WITNESSES SHARON AND/OR JAMES S. BRIDGEWATER HAS NO JUVENILLE, MISDEMEANOR OR FELONY RECORD); and charges the Class Plaintiff with having committed a serious crime of murder, rape, etc.

10.. As a proximate result of the above the Plaintiff James S. Bridgewater has suffered lost of reputation, low self esteem, shame, mortification, injury to all to her damage in excess of $10,000.00000000000.

The above describe publication is not privileged because it was published or posted by Defendant Loretta Lynch in the Department of Justice and upon information and belief with the state of mind of malice, hatred and/or ill will toward the Plaintiff James S. Bridgewaerand without probable cause and upon information and belief in retaliation “only because the Plaintiff was the victim of Racketeering (Federal Witness),” and the will to punish the Plaintiff for asserting her legal rights.

[1] AND CONTINUES TO POST THIS DEFAMATORY INFORMATION.

[2] There have been multiple, numerous other unlawful acts(complete torture and torment too many to mention during the course of 7-8 years).

[3] AND CONTINUES TO POST THIS DEFAMATORY INFORMATION.

[4] There have been multiple, numerous other unlawful acts(complete torture and torment too many to mention during the course of 7-8 years).

CLAIM III

NEGILENCE

In any negligence case, the plaintiff bears the burden of proving the existence of a duty owed by the defendant, a breach of that duty, causation, and damage

On or about Jan. 4, 2016 Defendant Lynch and/or obamaperfomed acts that a person of ordinary prudence in the same or similar cicumstances would not have done or she failed to perform acts that a person or ordinary prudence would have done under he same or cimilar circumstance becase she is the United States Attorney General and knew and/or should have known the “Untied States Constitution.” Even further Obama was an instructor at Hardvard “Specializing in constitutional law, he too knew or should have known the the Class Plaintiff were violated. The Class Plaintiff have been injured and damge by the the 2^nd amended US Cosntiton rights violations and have damages this amount is due and now owing.

CLAIM IV

BREACH OF CONTRACT AGAINST LORETTA LYNCH IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITY

CLAIM I

[ RICO ]

BREACH OF CONTRACT

Plaintiff allege that the Defendant Donald Trump in his official capacity breached his contract, the Plaintiff has demanded property and Defendant has failed and refuse and continues to fail and to refuse, to remit the money and/or property although duly demanded requiring immediate injunctive relief and the Plaintiff has been damaged and continues to be damage and have damages as follows:

_____________________ $_______________

This amount is due and now owing, and the Plaintiff is entitled to writ of attachment, judgment in the amount of __________________.

Amount paid $0 Amount due: $______________________.

CLAIM I

[ RICO ]

BREACH OF FIDICARY DUTIES

_____________________ $_______________

This amount is due and now owing, and the Plaintiff is entitled to writ of attachment, judgment in the amount of __________________.

Amount paid $0 Amount due: $______________________.

CLAIM II

[ RICO ]

CONDUCT AND PARTICIPATION IN A RICO ENTERPRIZE THRU A PATTERN OF

RACKEETEERING ACTIVITY

Plaintiff allege that the Defendant Donald Trump in his official capacity conducted in a Rico Enterprize thru a pattern of Rackeeteering Activity and the plaintiff has been injured and damaged and Plaintiff has demanded property and Defendant has failed and refuse and continues to fail and to refuse, to remit the money and/or property although duly demanded requiring immediate injunctive relief and the Plaintiff has been damaged and continues to be damage and have damages as follows:

_____________________ $_______________

The Plantiff have punitive damages in the amount of $ ________________________. This amount is due and now owing.

This amount is due and now owing, and the Plaintiff is entitled to writ of attachment, judgment in the amount of __________________.

Amount paid $0 Amount due: $______________________.

CLAIM III

[ RICO ]

CONSPIRACY TO ENGAGE IN A PATTERN OF RACKEETEERING ACTIVITY:

Plaintiff allege that the Defendant Donald Trump in his official capacity conspired to engage in a pattern of Rackeeterring Activity and the plaintiff has been injured and damaged and Plaintiff has demanded property and Defendant has failed and refuse and continues to fail and to refuse, to remit the money and/or property although duly demanded requiring immediate injunctive relief and the Plaintiff has been damaged and continues to be damage and have damages as follows:

_____________________ $_______________

This amount is due and now owing, and the Plaintiff is entitled to writ of attachment, judgment in the amount of __________________.

Amount paid $0 Amount due: $______________________.

CLAIM IV

[ RICO ]

MALICIOUS PROSECUTION

Plaintiff allege that the Defendant Donald Trump in his official capacity instituted and/or continued a criminal proceeding agains the claimant and the termination of the proceeding ended in the Claimant favor and the plaintiff has been injured and damaged anPlaintiff has demanded property and Defendant has failed and refuse and continues to fail and to refuse, to remit the money and/or property although duly demanded requiring immediate injunctive relief and the Plaintiff has been damaged and continues to be damage and have damages as follows:

_____________________ $_______________

This amount is due and now owing, and the Plaintiff is entitled to writ of attachment, judgment in the amount of __________________.

Amount paid $0 Amount due: $______________________.

CLAIM V

[ RICO ]

VIOLATION OF THE CLAIMANT 5^TH AND/OR 9^TH AND/OR 10^TH AMENDMENT US CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT[42 USC SECTION 1983/1985(3)]

Plaintiff allege that the Defendant Donald Trump in his official capacity acted under the color of law denied and/or deprived the Claimant her 5^th and/or 9^th and/or 10^th Amendment US Constitutional rights and the plaintiff has been injured and damaged anPlaintiff has demanded property and Defendant has failed and refuse and continues to fail and to refuse, to remit the money and/or property although duly demanded requiring immediate injunctive relief and the Plaintiff has been damaged and continues to be damage and have damages as follows:

_____________________ $_______________

This amount is due and now owing, and the Plaintiff is entitled to writ of attachment, judgment in the amount of __________________.

Amount paid $0 Amount due: $______________________.

CLAIM VI

[ RICO ]

LIBEL

Plaintiff allege that the Defendant Donald Trump in his official capacity acted under the color of law conspired with other and “libeled” the Claimant and the plaintiff has been injured and damaged anPlaintiff has demanded property and Defendant has failed and refuse and continues to fail and to refuse, to remit the money and/or property although duly demanded requiring immediate injunctive relief and the Plaintiff has been damaged and continues to be damage and have damages as follows:

_____________________ $_______________

This amount is due and now owing, and the Plaintiff is entitled to writ of attachment, judgment in the amount of __________________.

Amount paid $0 Amount due: $______________________.

CLAIM VII

[ RICO ]

NEGLIENCE

Plaintiff allege that the Defendant Donald Trump in his official capacity was negligent in enforcing unconstitutional, arbiratory law via the March 6, 2017 executive order and the plaintiff has been injured and damaged anPlaintiff has demanded property and Defendant has failed and refuse and continues to fail and to refuse, to remit the money and/or property although duly demanded requiring immediate injunctive relief and the Plaintiff has been damaged and continues to be damage and have damages as follows:

_____________________ $_______________

This amount is due and now owing, and the Plaintiff is entitled to writ of attachment, judgment in the amount of __________________.

Amount paid $0 Amount due: $______________________.

CLAIM VIII

[ RICO ]

PUNITIVE DAMAGE

Plaintiff allege that the Defendant Donald Trump in his official capacity had conscious disregard for the Claimant civil rights and/or Declaration of human rights and the plaintiff has been injured and damaged and has demanded property and Defendant has failed and refuse and continues to fail and to refuse, to remit the money and/or property although duly demanded requiring immediate injunctive relief and the Plaintiff has been damaged and continues to be damage and have damages as follows:

_____________________ $_______________

This amount is due and now owing, and the Plaintiff is entitled to writ of attachment, judgment in the amount of __________________.

Amount paid $0 Amount due: $______________________.

WRIT OF MANDUMUS

CLAIM #V

DECLARATORY JUDGMENT

An actual controversy has arisen and now exists between plaintiff and defendant Loretta E. Lynch in her official capacity as United States Attorney General and/or “the Class Representative Bridgewater,” concerning their respective rights and duties in that plaintiff Representative contends “she at all times mention has been harmed and damaged and continues to be damaged by Loretta Lynch’s actions. This court is now vested with appropriate jurisdiction and power to declare the rights and legal relations of the parties “The United States..et al,” are entitled to the declaration, the declaration to have the force and effect of a final judgment aor decree, and to be reviewable as a final judgment or decree, and further this court may adjudge and decree and declare that the rights and legal relations of the parties to the subject matter here in controversy, in order that the declaration shall have the force and effect of a final judgment and decree.

a. fully vested with the right to prosecute, via the Private Attorney General

Statue (RICO) and/or collect and/or recover fines et al on behalf of the

United States Government .

b. Barak H.Obama(AKA Barry Soertoes) and/or “et als,” can not exert

executive privilege, and declare that the Plaintiff may amend her

complaint to add Barak H. Obama in his individually capacity as United

States President.

c.. “The United States ex rel Sharon Bridgewater Private Attorney General

and/or Qui Tam Relator(Claimant et al )is fully vested with the right to

have a writ of quo warranto issued upon Loretta Lynch in her official

capacity as United States Attorney General.

d. That this court adjudge and decree that Lynch and/or Barak H. Obama

violated the “The United States ex rel Sharon Bridgewater Private

Attorney General and/or Qui Tam Relator(Claimant et al )class Plaintiff

Have the right to pre-judgment attachment in the amount of $!25,000,000,000,000,000.00(Trillion Dollars) for the United States ex rel Sharon Bridgewater Private Attorney General and/or Qui Tam Relator. $_____________________

e. That the Petiititioner is entitled to a summary judgment.

CLAIM #VI

INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

B. Irreparable Harm and Balancing of Hardships and E.ties

. On balance, Plaintiff’s hardship

in not being able to express his views and the public interest in protecting speechoutweigh the Government’s interest in suppressing an intimidating symbol.Plaintiffs has demonstrated a strong possibility of irreparable harm absent apreliminary injunction. Millions of US Citizen are even now Marching toward Washington to oust Obama and/or Holder from Office. In order to prevent a National Riot this Court must take actions now to secure the safety and security of the United States of America. The issuance of a pretrial restraining order is not discretionary: if the Government makes the re.red probable cause showing, the court must entertheorder.if not enjoined, will cause immediate and irreparable injury to the United States Government and continued loss of billions of dollars and have asserted claims of already presented sufficient facts to establish the elements of each of the claims there is a substantial likelihood of success on the merits of the plaintiff’s claim.

C. The Injury to Sharon Bridgewater outweigh the harm an injunction may cause Defendants;

The entry of a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction giving Plaintiffs

Writ of attachment, assets, and/or a for the Defendants to post a bond will cause no harm whatsoever to Defendants and the prevention of eviction of camp take notice.

D. The granting of the injunction would not harm the public interest.

Where a party demonstrates both the likelihood of success on the merits and irreparable. injury, it almost always will be the case that the public interest will favor the issuance of aninjunction will protect the public interest, protect the US Government from fraudulent false claims and prevent further RICO acts. The Supreme Court has repeatedly emphasized that courts are vested with extensive e.table powers to fashion appropriate remedies to redress unlawful conduct. An example, in Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Bd. of Educ., 402 U.. 1 (1971), the Supreme Court stated: Once a right and a violation have been shown, the scope of a district court’s e.table powers to remedy past wrongs is broad, for breadth and flexibility are inherent in e.tableremedies.“The essence of e.ty jurisdiction has been the power of the Chancellor to do e.ty and to mould each decree to the necessities of the particular case. Flexibility rather than rigidity has distinguished it. The qualities of mercy and practicality have made e.ty the instrument for nice adjustment and reconciliation between the public interest and private needs as well as between competing private claims.” Hecht Co. v. Bowles, 321 U.. 321, 329-330 (1944), also See also Mitchell v. Robert DeMario Jewelry, Inc., 361 U.. 288, 291-92 (1960)

Moreover, the Supreme Court has pointedly ruled that where “the public interest is involved. . . those e.table powers assume an even broader and more flexible character than when only a private controversy is at stake.” Porter v. Warner Holding, Co., 328 U.. 395, 398 (1946). Accord Virginian Ry. Co. v. Sys. Fed’n. No. 40, 300 U.. 515, 552 (1937) (“Courts of e.ty may, and frequently do, go much farther both to give and withhold relief in furtherance of the public interest than they are accustomed to go when only private interests are involved.”) (collecting cases); Golden State Bottling Co. v. NLRB, 414 U.. 168, 179-80 (1973) (same).12

In accordance with these principles, courts have imposed a wide variety of highly

intrusive e.table remedies in institutional reform litigation to remedy constitutional violations and to foster paramount public interests, including various structural reforms.13 Typically in such cases, the e.table relief afforded exceeds an injunction enjoining the proscribed conduct, and also encompasses compelled changes in practices, structural changes and prolonged court-supervision over implementation of the e.table relief. See generally, DOBBS, Vol. Two at 348-353. The United States of America as well as class Plaintiff There are no adequate remedy at law.

CLAIM #VII

MY PRAYER TO GOD IN HEAVEN

Wherefore , IT IS DECREED, ORDER, ADJUDGE

1. THE STATE of Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming[the District of Columbia, the Common wealth of Puerto Rico, The US Virgin Island, Guam, theNorthern Marianna Islands, the American Samoa] EX REL Sharon Bridgewater (A.K.A. Sharon Abusalem, Sharon Davis) Private Attorney General and QUI TAM RELATOR[ FROM 1993 and continuing thru present]- Real parties in interest

CLAIMANT AND/OR PLAINTIFF prays and/or declare that Loretta Lynch Social Security, ATF acts of Jan. 4, 2016 and/or May 9, 2016 unconstitutionally infringes upon Sharon Bridgewater and other class members one or more 2^nd 4^th, 5^th, 9^th, 10^th, 14^th, US Constitional rights amendementthe rights and/or breach her contract as US Attorney General and/or violated her oath of office and committeed a criminal act.

12.. Jugment in the amount of ____________________for claim #1 Libel, order the

Defendants to immediately pay and issue writs of attachment.

13.. Jugment in the amount of ____________________for claim #2 Violation of the Equal

Protection 2^nd amendment and Violation of the Right to bear Firearms(US

Constitutional Amendment II), 42 USC SECTION 1983 order the Defendants to

immediately pay and issue writs of attachment.

14.. Judement in the amount of ____________________for claim #3 neglience and order

The Defendants to immediately pay and issue writs of attachment.

15.. Judgment in the amount of ____________________for claim #4 breach of contract

and

order the Defendants to immediately pay and issue writs of attachment.

16.. Declaratory Judgment declaring that Plaintiff is:

a. fully vested with the right to prosecute, via the Private Attorney General

Statue (RICO) and/or collect and/or recover fines et al on behalf of the

United States Government .

b. Barak H.Obama(AKA Barry Soertoes) and/or “et als,” can not exert

executive privilege, and declare that the Plaintiff may amend her

complaint to add Barak H. Obama in his individually capacity as United

States President.

c.. “The United States ex rel Sharon Bridgewater Private Attorney General

and/or Qui Tam Relator(Claimant et al )is fully vested with the right to

have a writ of quo warranto issued upon Loretta Lynch in her official

capacity as United States Attorney General.

d. That this court adjudge and decree that Lynch and/or Barak H. Obama

violated the “The United States ex rel Sharon Bridgewater Private

Attorney General and/or Qui Tam Relator(Claimant et al )class Plaintiff

e. That the Petiititioner is entitled to a summary judgment.

17. .Equitable and/or Injunctive Relief Prejudgment writs of attachment in

$125,000,000,000,000,000.00 Judgment against Loretta

Lynch

THIS COURT USD) to commence Relator’s rehabilitation i.e. food, shelter, clothing, and

transportation, payable by the Office of the U.S. Attorney General, District of

Columbia to the client trust account (Sharon Bridgewater)of the lawyer duly appointed by

16.. udgment in the amount of $ 1,000,000,000,000,000 MILLION DOLLARS

AGAINST LORETTA LYNCH IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY.

18. Partial judgment in the amount of $ ___________________– payment of ten thousand

U.S. Dollars ($10,000.00 )

18.. That this Court liberally construe the RICO laws and thereby find and/or declare that all Defendants have associated with a RICO enterprise of persons and of other individuals who were associated in fact, all of whom did engage in, and whose activities did affect, interstate and foreign commerce in violation of the RICO law at 18 U.S.C. 1962(c) (Prohibited activities).

19..That this Court liberally construe the RICO laws and thereby find that all Defendants have conducted and/or participated, directly or indirectly, in the affairs of said RICO enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity in violation of the RICO laws at 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961(5) (“pattern” defined) and 1962(c) supra.

20. That all Defendants and all of their directors, officers, employees, agents, servants and all other persons in active concert or in participation with them, be enjoined temporarily during pendency of this action, and permanently thereafter, from associating with any RICO enterprise of persons, or of other individuals associated in fact, who do engage in, or whose activities do affect, interstate and foreign commerce.

21.. That all Defendants and all of their directors, officers, employees, agents, servants and all other persons in active concert or in participation with them, be enjoined temporarily during pendency of this action, and permanently thereafter, from conducting or participating, either directly or indirectly, in the conduct of the affairs of any RICO enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity in violation of the RICO laws at 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961(5) and 1962(c) supra.

22.That if Defendant cannot be found within this District then all of their property within this istrict be attached in the sum of $125,000,000,000,000,1,000,000,000.00(one hundred and twenty five trillion and one million dollars, with interest thereon and cost, the sum sued for in this complaint.

23. That judgment be entered against the dfenant in the sum of $$125,000,000,000,000,1,000,000,000.00(one hundred and twenty five trillion and one million dollars, together with interest and costs; and

24. That this Court order the attachment of said property pruusantot he aforesaid provovision of CPLR and FRCP 4(e) and Rule B(1) of the Supplenmtnal Rules for certain Admarility and Maritime claims: and

25. That process in due form of law, according to the practices of this Honorable Court in causes of admirality and maritime jurisprudence, April issue agains the The Federal Reserve, foreign Officials, and all Defndants that all person having or claiming any interest therein be citized to apper and answer under oath, all and singular the matters aforesaid; that Plaitniff have a deree for its damaged aforesaid, with interest and cost; and that the The Federal Reserve, foreign Officials, and all Defndants be condemned and sld to stisfy plaintiff decree;

26. That process in due form of law April issue against B citing it to appear and answer, under oath, all and singular, the matters aforesaid

27. That the Court order, adjudge and decree that Plaitnifff have a decree against B for claim asserted gy plaintiff herein tooether with interest and costs and

28. To issue an order to the U.S. Department of Justice Loretta Lynch to show cause why she should not be held in criminal and/or civil contempt of court.

29. To attachment of said property pruusantot he aforesaid one or more supplemental rule B, C, D, E and/or F, 4(e) and Rule B(1) of the Supplenmtnal Rules for certain Admarility and Maritime claims: and/or

30. That process in due form of law, according to the practices of this Honorable Court in causes of admirality and maritime jurisprudence, intangible and/or tangible property in and up to the amount of $$125,000,000,000,000,1,000,000,000.00(one hundred and twenty five trillion and one million dollars, and that all person having or claiming any interest therein be citized to apper and answer under oath, all and singular the matters aforesaid; that Plaitniff have a deree for its damaged aforesaid, with interest and cost; and that the $$125,000,000,000,000,1,000,000,000.00(one hundred and twenty five trillion and one million dollarsbe condemned and sld to stisfy plaintiff decree;

That process in due form of law April issue against B citing it to appear and answer, under oath, all and singular, the matters aforesaid;
That the Court order, adjudge and decree that Plaitnifff have a decree against B for claim asserted gy plaintiff herein tooether with interest and costs and
That Plaintiff have such other and further relief as April be proper and that this Court scompettnetotgrnt.
That Plaintiff have such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, under the full range of relevant circumstances which have occasioned the instant action.
WRIT OF ATTACHMENT in the amount of Plaitniffs damages, tighter with interest thereon form the rrespective dates due, cost, disbursements, and reasonable attorney fees.
1. That process in due form of law according to the practice of this court in cases of admirality and maritime jurisdiction April issue against the Defendant cititng it to apprear and answer all the matters described in this complaint.
1. Plaintiff have such other and further relief in the premises as in law and justice in April be entitled to receive.

(7) Order directing the U.S. Marshals Service to expedite Relator’s safe passage to Detroit,

Michigan(home) 12070 W. Outer Drive, Detroit, Michigan 48223 USA; and,

(8) any and all other relief which this Court deems just and proper under the several circumstances

which have occasioned the instant INITIAL APPLICATION e.g. Habeas Corpus relief,WRITS

OF MANDUMUS(EXPUNGEMENT OF ARREST WARRANTS, ETC.), AND relief

from retaliatory actions, triple damages etc.

For judgment in the amount of Plaitniffdamgestogher with interettheron form the resptice dates due, cost, disburements, and reasonable attorney feees.

Declare that Lynch actions are illegal and unlawful in that she can not obstruct justice and/or a congressional investigation .

Declare thatthePlaintiff Bridgewater is unlawful held against her will and each and every arrest warrant of the Plaintiff is illegal and are void.

Declare that the Plaintiff Sharon and/or James Bridgewater is unlawful imprisoned against her will under the State of Michigan and Georgia, and/or California law.

Declare that Holder cannot withhold any information pertaining to this complaint, allegations, and the Plaintiff “Sharon Bridgewater” is entitled to injunctive relief

Declare that Lynch and/or Holder must produce all documents relating to any and all allegations made by the Plaintiffs and/or the Committeee and Oversight.

Deckare that Lynch is disqualified and/or declare that the Platniff Bridgewater can prosecute this action.

Under federal rules of Criminal Procedure – Rule 6, submit the name of Respondant Barak H. Obama in his official capacity, Loretta Lynch in her official capacity, Hillary Clinton “respondants,” and all other co-conspirator to a federal grand jury for [included common law grand jury letter-to all judges]for the crime of advocating the overthrow of the Constituional form of government of the United States, Treason, etc.(5 USC 3331, 5 USC 3333, 18 usc 1918 and Executive order No.s

Accordingly, all premises having been duly considered here, the United States now moves the Honorable Justices of this District Court for an ORDER to the 17A District Court to show cause why Extraordinary Writs of Mandamus should not issue, commanding that Circuit Court to perform ‑‑ with all deliberate speed ‑‑ all duties owed to Appellant as specifically itemized above, beginning with a Habeas Corpus and/or Writs of mandamus to expunge arrest etc.

The United States moves for said ORDER, on the strengths of this PETITION and of the official records that are now before this Court, to reinstate a cause erroneously dismissed.

grant the Petitioner all just and appropriate relief as deemed by this court.

I certify and/or Declare and/or state under penalty and perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed 1STday of August 2016 in Detroit, Michigan

_____________________________________

THE STATE of Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming[the District of Columbia, the Common wealth of Puerto Rico, The US Virgin Island, Guam, theNorthern Marianna Islands, the American Samoa] EX REL Sharon Bridgewater (A.K.A. Sharon Abusalem, Sharon Davis) Private Attorney General and QUI TAM RELATOR[ FROM 1993 and continuing thru present]- Real parties in interest

_____________________

Accordingly, all premises having been duly considered here, the United States now moves the Honorable Justices of this District Court for an ORDER to the 17A District Court to show cause why Extraordinary Writs of Mandamus should not issue, commanding that Circuit Court to perform ‑‑ with all deliberate speed ‑‑ all duties owed to Appellant as specifically itemized above, beginning with a Habeas Corpus and/or Writs of mandamus to expunge arrest etc.

The United States moves for said ORDER, on the strengths of this PETITION and of the official records that are now before this Court, to reinstate a cause erroneously dismissed.

ISSUE AGAINST Defendants Loretta Lynch be cared to appear and answer the allegation of this Complaint;

Issue a Writ of Qi Warrantor Loretta L. Lynch

Private Attorney General, hereby exercises its statutory and appeal and moves this honorable Court for a Writ in the nature of Quo Warrantor to issue upon Loretta E. Lynching her official capacity as United States Attorney General to demonstrate by what lawful authorities each claims to preside as the United States of American Attorney General Intervener also moves this honorable Court for a routine ORDER to the District Court Clerk, commanding that Office formally to certify to the United States Attorney General formal commanding that Office formally to certify appellant for presentation of all evidence admissible in the instant appeal, and for argument(s) on the questions of the constitutionality of the above.

That this Court liberally construe the RICO laws and thereby find and/or declare that all Defendants have associated with a RICO enterprise of persons and of other individuals who were associated in fact, all of whom did engage in, and whose activities did affect, interstate and foreign commerce in violation of the RICO law at 18 U.S.C. 1962(c) (Prohibited activities).

That this Court liberally construe the RICO laws and thereby find that all Defendants have conducted and/or participated, directly or indirectly, in the affairs of said RICO enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity in violation of the RICO laws at 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961(5) (“pattern” defined).

That all Defendants and all of their directors, officers, employees, agents, servants and all other persons in active concert or in participation with them, be enjoined temporarily during pendency of this action, and permanently thereafter, from associating with any RICO enterprise of persons, or of other individuals associated in fact, who do engage in, or whose activities do affect, interstate and foreign commerce.

That all Defendants and all of their directors, officers, employees, agents, servants and all other persons in active concert or in participation with them, be enjoined temporarily during pendency of this action, and permanently thereafter, from conducting or participating, either directly or indirectly, in the conduct of the affairs of any RICO enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity in violation of the RICO laws at 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961(5) .

That if Defendant cannot be found within this District then all of their property within this district be attached in the sum of $________________________________, with interest thereon and cost, the sum sued for in this complaint.

That judgment be entered against the defendant in the sum of $_________________together with interest and costs; and

If for any reason it is alleged and/or found that Plaintiff is not entitled to the attachment of the Defendants property under Admiralty principle of foreign attachment, then in the, Plaintiff invokes the revision of Section 6201 to 6226 of the New York CPLR (and/or similar “50 State laws”).

this honorable Court for a Writ in the nature of Quo Warrantor to issue upon Loretta E. Lynching her official capacity as United States Attorney General to demonstrate by what lawful authorities claims to preside as the United States of American Attorney General commanding that Office formally to certify to the United States Attorney General formal and the Intervener also moves this Court for a routine ORDER to the District Clerk, commanding that Office formally to certify Intervener’s intervention for presentation of all evidence admissible in the instant appeal, and for argument(s) on the questions of the constitutionality of the above.

All premises having been duly considered, Intervener respectfully requests this honorable Court to issue a routine ORDER to the U.S. Department of Justice Loretta E. Lynch to show because why she should not be held in criminal and/or civil contempt of court.

ate and prays that this Court order the attachment of said property pursuant to the aforesaid provision of CPLR and FRCP 4(e) and Rule B(1) of the Supplenmtnal Rules for certain Admarility and Maritime claims: and

That process in due form of law, according to the practices of this Honorable Court in causes of admirality and maritime jurisprudence, April issue agains the The Federal Reserve, foreign Officials, and all Defndants that all person having or claiming any interest therein be citized to apper and answer under oath, all and singular the matters aforesaid; that Plaitniff have a deree for its damaged aforesaid, with interest and cost; and that the The Federal Reserve, foreign Officials, and all Defndants be condemned and sld to stisfy plaintiff decree;

That process in due form of law April issue against B citing it to appear and answer, under oath, all and singular, the matters aforesaid;

That the Court order, adjudge and decree that Plaitnifff have a decree against B for claim asserted gy plaintiff herein tooether with interest and costs and

That Plaintiff have such other and further relief as April be proper and that this Court s compettnet ot grnt.

That process in due form of law according to thepractice of this Honorable Court issue against the Defndants, citing them to appear and answer under oath all and singular the matters aforesaid;

Declare that Loretta E. Lynchaction constitute conspiracy under the color of law, and declare that Lynch is ineligle and/or disqualified as United States Attorney General.

Declare Obama can not exert executive privledge.

Judgment against Loretta LynchPrejudgment writs of Attachment for $100,000,000,000,0000,000(One Hundred Trillion Dollars via Loretta E. Lynch“Class Representative,”Million Dollars and prejudgment writ of attachment for and Judgment against Barak Obama in her official capacity et al for $100,000,000,0000,0000 judgment for its damges with interest and costs, agisnt the Defenants; and

That this court grant Plaintiff such other and further relief as the justice of the cause April appear.

To issue an order to the U.S. Department of Justice Loretta E. Lynchto show cause why she should not be held in criminal and/or civil contempt of court.
To attachment of said property pruusant ot he aforesaid provovision of CPLR and FRCP 4(e) and Rule B(1) of the Supplenmtnal Rules for certain Admarility and Maritime claims: and/or
That process in due form of law, according to the practices of this Honorable Court in causes of admirality and maritime jurisprudence, April issue agains the stem ship, her enginces, tacke appearl. Etc. and that all person having or claiming any interest therein be citized to apper and answer under oath, all and singular the matters aforesaid; that Plaitniff have a deree for its damaged aforesaid, with interest and cost; and that the steamship__________be condemned and sld to stisfy plaintiff decree;
That process in due form of law April issue against B citing it to appear and answer, under oath, all and singular, the matters aforesaid;
That the Court order, adjudge and decree that Plaitnifff have a decree against B for claim asserted gy plaintiff herein tooether with interest and costs and
That Plaintiff have such other and further relief as April be proper and that this Court s compettnet ot grnt.
That Plaintiff have such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, under the full range of relevant circumstances which have occasioned the instant action.
All other relief in which this court may deem just and appropriate.
Burification and/or Burificate all claims for relief .
The Plaintiff request this court to tranfer and consolidate all related casesand further that this court issue a Writ of Certiorari in this cause requiring Defendants to file the record of all matters relating to this decision with the Court; (b) that the Court issue an emergency stay of enforcement of the decision pending review on the merits in this causeand that the Court review the decision of the Defendants, that the final administrative decision be reversed, and for such other relief as this court deems just.
Accordingly, all premises having been duly considered here, the United States now moves the Honorable Justices of this District Court of Columbia for Loretta E. Lynchto show cause why Extraordinary Writs of Mandamus should not issue, commanding that Circuit Court to perform ‑‑ with all deliberate speed ‑‑ all duties owed to Appellant and/or Committee and Oversight.

The United States moves for said ORDER, on the strengths of this PETITION and of the official records that are now before this District Court of Columbia, to reinstate a cause erroneously dismissed.

That process ISSUE AGAINST Loretta E. Lynch be cired to appear and answer the allegatioin of this Complaint.

Issue a Writ in the nature of Quo Warranto to issue upon Loretta E. Lynchin her official capacity as United States Attorney General to demonstrate by what lawful authorities each claims to preside as the United States of American Attorney General .
All premises having been duly considered, Intervenor respectfully requests this honorable Court to issue a routine ORDER to the U.S. Department of Justice Loretta E. Lynchto show cause why she should not be held in criminal and/or civil contempt of court.
To appoint Special Prosecutors and/or issue arrest warrants.

That this Court liberally construe the RICO laws and thereby find and/or declare that all Defendants have associated with a RICO enterprise of persons and of other individuals who were associated in fact, all of whom did engage in, and whose activities did affect, interstate and foreign commerce in violation of the RICO law at 18 U.S.C. 1962(c) (Prohibited activities).

That this Court liberally construe the RICO laws and thereby find that all Defendants have conducted and/or participated, directly or indirectly, in the affairs of said RICO enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity in violation of the RICO laws at 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961(5) (“pattern” defined) and 1962(c) supra.

That all Defendants and all of their directors, officers, employees, agents, servants and all other persons in active concert or in participation with them, be enjoined temporarily during pendency of this action, and permanently thereafter, from associating with any RICO enterprise of persons, or of other individuals associated in fact, who do engage in, or whose activities do affect, interstate and foreign commerce.

That all Defendants and all of their directors, officers, employees, agents, servants and all other persons in active concert or in participation with them, be enjoined temporarily during pendency of this action, and permanently thereafter, from conducting or participating, either directly or indirectly, in the conduct of the affairs of any RICO enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity in violation of the RICO laws at 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961(5) and 1962(c) supra.

That if Defendant cannot be found within this District then all of their property within this istrict be attached in the sum of $________________________________, with interest thereon and cost, the sum sued for in this complaint;

That judgment be entered against the dfenant in the sum of $_________________together with interest and costs; and

If for any reason it is alleged and/or found that Plaintiff is not entitled to the attachment of the Dfenants property under Admirality principle of foreign attachment, then in the, Plaintiff invokes the rovision of Section 6201 to 6226 of the New Yor CPLR(and/or similar “50 State laws”).
Title 18 U.S.C. §§ 2(a), 2(b), 1341, 1343, 1346, 1952, 1956, 1957,
2314, and 2315.
ate and prays that this Court order the attachment of said property pruusant ot he aforesaid provovision of CPLR and FRCP 4(e) and Rule B(1) of the Supplenmtnal Rules for certain Admarility and Maritime claims: and
That Plaintiff April have such other and further relief as in lawq and justice tit April be entitle to receive.

Wherefore, Plaintiff prays;

That process in due form of law, according to the practices of this Honorable Court in causes of admirality and maritime jurisprudence, April issue agains the stem ship, her enginces, tacke appearl. Etc. and that all person having or claiming any interest therein be citized to apper and answer under oath, all and singular the matters aforesaid; that Plaitniff have a deree for its damaged aforesaid, with interest and cost; and that the steamship__________be condemned and sld to stisfy plaintiff decree;
That process in due form of law April issue against B citing it to appear and answer, under oath, all and singular, the matters aforesaid;
That the Court order, adjudge and decree that Plaitnifff have a decree against B for claim asserted gy plaintiff herein tooether with interest and costs and
That Plaintiff have such other and further relief as April be proper and that this Court s compettnet ot grnt.

That Plaintiff have such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper, under the full range of relevant circumstances which have occasioned the instant action. Judgment WRIT OF ATTACHMENT in the amount of Plaitniffs damages, tighter with interest thereon form the rrespective dates due, cost, disbursements, and reasonable attorney fees.

That process in due form of law according to the practice of this court in cases of admirality and maritime jurisdiction April issue against the Defendant cititng it to apprear and answer all the matters described in this complaint.Plaintiff have such other and further relief in the premises as in law and justice in April be entitled to receive.

SCHEDULE[DESIGNATION OF SCHEDULE]

Defendant’s Status and addresss:
A. Unpon information and belief and at all times hereinafter mentioned, Defendant Barak H. Obama(AKA Barry Soertoes) class representative was a [type of legaly entity]authorized under the laws of the United States Constition, with offices and a place of business at [Obama address]

DETAILS OF THE _________(S)

Bill of Lading No.{ number of bill} dated {dated of bill of lading – 1993 thru present] from [name of citiy], [name of county] to [name of city], [name of state] on the vessel [name of vessel], [one(1) container SAID TO CONTAIN: [description of contents], at the applicable tariff charge of $____________dollar amount of ttarriff charge EXhits { of exhibit}

Amount Paid: Amount Due:____________

SUMMARY OF DAMAGES

Summary of Reasonable Counsel’s Fees: TBA

Summary of Consequential Damages: TBA

Summary of Actual Damages (partial list):

unpaid professional invoices: $ 10,000.000000000000000

triple damage multiplier (3x): $ 325,050.0000000000000000

triple damage multiplier (3x): $491,400,000.0000000000000000

Subtotal: $11111,310,833,400.00

TOTAL DAMAGES (minimum): $5,243,333,600.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

admiralityandmaritimeform1amended Download

admiralityandmaritimeclaim Download