FORMAL CRIMINAL CHARGES–

CRIMINAL INFORMATION AND/OR PROBABLE CAUSE

COMES NOW THE THE STATE of Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming[the District of Columbia, the Common wealth of Puerto Rico, The US Virgin Island, Guam, theNorthern Marianna Islands, the American Samoa] EX REL Sharon Bridgewater (A.K.A. Sharon Abusalem, Sharon Davis) Private Attorney General and RELATOR[ FROM 1993 and continuing thru present]- Real parties in interest the undersigned complaintant says makes the following affirmation under the penalties of perjury, and being duly sworn state the following is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.and that On or about 1785 and continuing thru present and further contining thru present the upon information and belief, the following Federal and/or State crimes did take place in the County of the District of Columbia, Washington D.C., in the County of Gwinnett, State of Georgia, in the County of Dekalb, State of Georgia, in the County of Fulton, State of Georgia, in the County of Oakland, State of California, in the County of San Francisco, State of California, in the County of Washtenaw, State of Michigan and “unknown” cities or towns in the State of Georgia, State of California, State of California, and/or Michigan, and in the County of Wayne, State of Michigan and in the State of California, and/or the “50 States” in “unknown” cities or Towns, and/or in the District of Columbia and/or in the contininial of United States, complains, alleges and appearing before a Federal Judge of the United States, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4, to report these crimes FORMALLY CHARGE

COUNT III

CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT TREASON

by levying war against the USA

by adhering to their enemies,

giving those enemies aid and comfort

within the USA and elsewhere

Beginning on or about Jan. 1, 1993 and continuing thru the filing of this complaint within the District of Columbia and else in the US and/or intentionally, did unlawfully, willfully and knowingly combined, conspire together and with each other, came to the meeting of the minds, entered into an unlawful agreement and/or came to a mutual understanding to accomplish a common and unlawful plan, namely to engage in a “pattern of racketeering activity” to commit_list predicate acts(violate a, b,c) and knowingly and willfully became a member of such conspiracy and futher, at the time, joined such conspiracy, he or she or they did so with the specific intent either to personally engage in at least two incidents of racketeering, as alleged in the Information,______________________ or he or she or they specifically intended to otherwise participate in the affairs of the “enterprise” with the knowledge and intent that other members of the conspiracy would engage in at least two incidents of racketeering, ______________________as alleged in the Information, as part of a “pattern of racketeering act or became a member without full knowledge of of all of the details of the unlawful scheme but has an understanding of the unlawful nature of a plan and knowingly and willfully joins in that plan on one occasion, and played a minor part. In the unlawful scheme.

Conspiracy to

COUNT THREE: Conspiracy to violate 18 U.S.C. 2381

Conspircy to commit treason by levying war against the USA

by adhering to their enemies,

giving those enemies aid and comfort

within the USA and elsewhere

(multiple violations as a principal)

Beginning on or about Jan. 1, 1993 and/or on or about _______ continuing thru the filing of this complaint within the District of Columbia and else in the US and/or international, AKA Queen Elizabeth and/or Charles, did unlawfully, willfully and knowingly combined, conspire together and with each other, and to commit commit multiple federal felonies by levying war against the several States and by adhering to their enemies, giving those enemies aid and comfort within three States of the Union and elsewhere, all in connection with the deaths

TREASON

18 U.S. Code § 2339B – Providing material support or resources to designated foreign terrorist organizations

COUNT SIX: 18 U.S.C.

CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT TREASON

COUNT SIX: 18 U.S.C.

Aiding and Abetting Engaging in a Monetary

Transaction in Property Derived from Specified Unlawful Activity

COUNT SIX: 18 U.S.C.286

Conspiracy to Defraud the United States Government

With Respect to Claims

From in or about 1993 through the present in Fairfax County, Virginia, and elsewhere in Virginia, in the District of Columbia, and Washington, D.C., defendants Barak H. Obama, Eric Holder,Shawn Dovanan, Kathleen Sebious _________, entered into a conspiracy to obtain payment; allowance; aid in obtainingpayment of claims against the United States Department of Treasury,a department of the United States, its Departments, programs or agencies for H defendant,____________________,

a resident of ____________________, made and presented to theUnited States Treasury Department a claim against the United States for payment, which he [she]knew to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent, by [e.g., preparing a budget and causing to be prepared a budget andfiling and causing to be filed, what purported to be a budget to operate the USA, which waspresented to the United States Treasury Department, through the Internal Revenue Service,wherein he [she] claimed [e.g., a refund of taxes]2 in the amount of $_____(Trillion of Dollars) knowing that claim to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent in violation of 18 U.S.C.286.

COUNT SIX: 18 U.S.C.287

False Claim

From in or about ___________, 20__ in Fairfax County, Virginia, and elsewhere in Virginia, in the District of Columbia, and/or Washington, D.C., defendants Barak H. Obama, _________, a resident of the USA, and/or District of Columbia made and presented to theUnited States Treasury Department a claim against the United States for payment, which he he knew to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent by preparing and/or causing to be prepared and submitting a budget what purported to be for to operate the Department of Justice which was presented to the United States Treasury Department of Treasury through the (?)US Congress, taxpayers, ______________¹ to deprive undersign counsel of his right to access to an impartial jury trial pursuant to civil RICO and 18 U.S.C. § 1983, as well as to an impartial court under the Federal Tort Claims Act, so to obstruct and cover-up the violations of federal statutory fathers’ rights to compel the extortion____ wherein he was not qualified to hold office and claimed to the right to hold office as US president and/or claimed to be a qualified individual to authorize to spend [e.g., a refund of taxes]2 in the amount of $__________, knowing that claim to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent.defendant,____________________,

COUNT SIX: 18 U.S.C.287

False Claim

From in or about ___________, 20__ in Fairfax County, Virginia, and elsewhere in Virginia, in the District of Columbia, and/or Washington, D.C., defendants Eric Holder, _________, a resident of the USA, and/or District of Columbia made and presented to theUnited States Treasury Department a claim against the United States for payment, which he he knew to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent by preparing and/or causing to be prepared and submitting a budget what purported to be for to operate the Department of Justice which was presented to the United States Treasury Department of Treasury through the (?)US Congress, taxpayers, ______________¹ to deprive undersign counsel of his right to access to an impartial jury trial pursuant to civil RICO and 18 U.S.C. § 1983, as well as to an impartial court under the Federal Tort Claims Act, so to obstruct and cover-up the violations of federal statutory fathers’ rights to compel the extortion____ wherein he was not qualified to hold office and claimed to the right to hold office as US president and/or claimed to be a qualified individual to authorize to spend [e.g., a refund of taxes]2 in the amount of $__________, knowing that claim to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent.defendant,____________________,

SIX: 18 U.S.C.287

False Claim

From in or about ___________, 20__ in Fairfax County, Virginia, and elsewhere in Virginia, in the District of Columbia, and/or Washington, D.C., defendants Shawn Donavan, _________, a resident of the USA, and/or District of Columbia made and presented to theUnited States Treasury Department a claim against the United States for payment, which he he knew to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent by preparing and/or causing to be prepared and submitting a budget what purported to be for to operate the Department of Justice which was presented to the United States Treasury Department of Treasury through the (?)US Congress, taxpayers, ______________¹ to deprive undersign counsel of his right to access to an impartial jury trial pursuant to civil RICO and 18 U.S.C. § 1983, as well as to an impartial court under the Federal Tort Claims Act, so to obstruct and cover-up the violations of federal statutory fathers’ rights to compel the extortion____ wherein he was not qualified to hold office and claimed to the right to hold office as US president and/or claimed to be a qualified individual to authorize to spend [e.g., a refund of taxes]2 in the amount of $__________, knowing that claim to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent.defendant,____________________,

COUNT SIX: 18 U.S.C.287

False Claim

From in or about ___________, 20__ in Fairfax County, Virginia, and elsewhere in Virginia, in the District of Columbia, and/or Washington, D.C., defendants Eric Kathleen Sebibus, _________, a resident of the USA, and/or District of Columbia made and presented to theUnited States Treasury Department a claim against the United States for payment, which he he knew to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent by preparing and/or causing to be prepared and submitting a budget what purported to be for to operate the Department of Justice which was presented to the United States Treasury Department of Treasury through the (?)US Congress, taxpayers, ______________¹ to deprive undersign counsel of his right to access to an impartial jury trial pursuant to civil RICO and 18 U.S.C. § 1983, as well as to an impartial court under the Federal Tort Claims Act, so to obstruct and cover-up the violations of federal statutory fathers’ rights to compel the extortion____ wherein he was not qualified to hold office and claimed to the right to hold office as US president and/or claimed to be a qualified individual to authorize to spend [e.g., a refund of taxes]2 in the amount of $__________, knowing that claim to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent.defendant,____________________,

COUNT SIX: 18 U.S.C.287

False Claim

From in or about ___________, 20__ in Fairfax County, Virginia, and elsewhere in Virginia, in the District of Columbia, and/or Washington, D.C., defendants Hillary Clinton, _________, a resident of the USA, and/or District of Columbia made and presented to theUnited States Treasury Department a claim against the United States for payment, which she knew to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent by preparing and/or causing to be prepared and submitting a budget what purported to be for to operate the Department of State which was presented to the United States Treasury Department of Treasury through the (?)US Congress, taxpayers, ______________¹ to deprive undersign counsel of his right to access to an impartial jury trial pursuant to civil RICO and 18 U.S.C. § 1983, as well as to an impartial court under the Federal Tort Claims Act, so to obstruct and cover-up the violations of federal statutory fathers’ rights to compel the extortion____ wherein he was not qualified to hold office and claimed to the right to hold office as US president and/or claimed to be a qualified individual to authorize to spend [e.g., a refund of taxes]2 in the amount of $__________, knowing that claim to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent.defendant,____________________, a resident of ____________________, made and presented to theUnited States Treasury Department a claim against the United States for payment, which he [she]knew to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent in violation of 18 U.S.C.287

COUNT SIX: 18 U.S.C.287

False Claim

From in or about ___________, 20__ in Fairfax County, Virginia, and elsewhere in Virginia, in the District of Columbia, and/or Washington, D.C., defendants Michelle Obama, _________, a resident of the USA, and/or District of Columbia made and presented to theUnited States Treasury Department a claim against the United States for payment, which she knew to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent, by preparing and/or submitting and/or causing to be filed with “White house Travel” what purported to be listed two daughters _____ as “white house staff members” waspresented to the United States Treasury Department, through the Travel Office of the White house, wherein she claimed and/or defrauded the United States Treasury in the amount of $__________, knowing thatclaim to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent in violation of 18 U.S.C.287

COUNT SIX: 18 U.S.C.371

CLAIM # I

joe biden in his officia capacity as presidentBARAK H. OBAMA[AKA BARRY SOERTOES]IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS PRESIDENT ON BEHALF OF ALL CLASS DEFENDANTS UNCOVERED US TREASURY PAYMENTS AND/OR MEDICADE PAYMENT

PLAINTIFF RE-ALLEGE THE ABOVE. On or about 2009 and continuing thru present , BARAK H. OBAMA[AKA BARRY SOERTOES]IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS PRESIDENT ON BEHALF OF ALL CLASS DEFENDANTS CONCEALED KNOWN FACTS RETAILATED AGAINST THE PLAINTIFF WHISTLEBLOWERS

Defendant Barak H.Obama[AKA Barry Soertoes] in his official capacity as [Predessors] IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS PRESIDENT ON BEHALF OF ALL CLASS DEFENDANTS and Loretta Lynch in her official capacity, Planned Parenthood, The Federal Reserve, “Class Defendants” and each of them knowingly and willfully conspired and agreed among themselves to engage in activities of which affect, interstate or foreign commerce and to conduct or participate, directly or indirectly, in the conduct of such enterprise’s affairs through a pattern of racketeering activity or collection of unlawful debt advocate and overthrow our constitutional form of Government, breach contracts and international treaties, commit war crimes, commit human rights violations, defraud the United States and submit false claims, support legislation, conspired, aided and abetted Planned Partnerhood to perform abortions, concealed known facts that they were selling fetal tissue and organ of aborted babies on the black market national and/or international for profit and launder money thru bank(owned and operated by the Federal Reserve), discriminate against the Plaintiff Whistleblowers had a fiduary relationship with Barak H. Obama and was discriminated against based on race, class and/or disability, retaliated against, kidnapped, committed human rights violations, assaulted by Obama acts or omissions. knowing that such claims to medicade and/or US Treasury would be submitted to the US Treasury for employed by or associated with any enterprise

Defendant “Class Members,” and each of them did the acts and things herein alleged pursuant to, and in furtherance of, the conspiracy and above-alleged agreement. Defendant class member adopted the acts, committed securities fraud, ___ , furthered the conspiracy by cooperation with [—or— lent aid and encouragement to—-or—ratified and adopted the acts of—-] defendants, ____ in that _______.

2..

<>. As a proximate result of the wrongful acts herein alleged plaintiff___ has___ been generally damaged in the sum of $____.

2) in deliberate ignorance; or

(3) in reckless disregard and submitted claims to the US Treasury for the years of 2010(3.4 Trillion), 2011(3.6 Trillion), 2012(3.5 Trillion), 2013(3.4 Trillion), 2014(3.5 Trillion), 2015(3.6 Trillion) 2016(3.9 Trillion), AND 2017(4.1 Trillion)(US budget for these years can be verfied at www:_____________)which constitute a false claims under the Federal False Claims act, in the amount of $84,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.00(EIGHTY FOUR TRILLION DOLLARS)that such claims are false, and are liable under the False Claims Act therefor. By virtue of these acts Obama _____as representative on behalf of class ____________ in the amount of $_______________, the amount is due and now owing. Wherefore the Plaintiff request judgment in the amount of $_________________and writs of attachments.

NOTICE OF “RETROACTIVE” FORFEITURE OF OFFICE, PROPERTY AND ARREST WARRANTS, ALSO IT IS DECREED, ORDERED, AND ADJUDED THAT ALL EXECUTIVE ORDER OF GEORGE H. BUSH, WILLIAM BILL CLINTON, GEORGE W. BUSH, BARAK H. OBAMA, DONALD TRUMP AND JOE BIDEN FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT, CONSPIRED TO COMMIT OFFENSES AGAINST THE U.SA. CONSPIRED TO COMMIT TREASON AND/OR CONSPIRED TO DEFRAUD THE U.S.A. IT’S DEPARTMENT AND AGENCIES IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. SECTION 371 AND ENGAGED IN A PATTERN OF RACKETEERING ACTIVITY. ALL “OFFICES” ARE FORFEITED ALL EXECUTIVE ORDER FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT ARE IS NULL AND VOID AND WITHOUT ANY LEGAL EFFECT, NOTICE OF RETROACTIVE ARREST WARRANTS FOR INTERNATIONAL “HEADS” OF STATE, UNITED NATION REPRESENTATIVE, WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION REPRESENTATIVE FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT!!

IT IS DECREED, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED THAT ALL WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION(ALL CONTRACTUAL RIGHTS), UNITED NATIONS – ORDERS, EMERGENCY ONE OR MORE COVID, MONKEY POX, “FLU” ETC. “HEALTH ORDERS” ARE NULL AND VOID AND WITHOUT ANY LEGAL EFFECT!!

MERRICK GARLAND CONSPIRED WITH ONE OR MORE JOE BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS, WILLLIAM BARR HIS PREDECESSOR, DONALD TRUMP AND/OR MIKE PENCE COMMITTED CRIMINAL ACTS

ALL CORRUPT!!

COMES NOW THE TWO WITNESSES STATE IN OPEN COURT, DECREE, ORDER, ADJUDGE(SENTENC THAT JOE BIDEN, DONALD TRUMP, MERRICK GARLAND ET AL IS GULITY OF TREASON IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S. Code § 2381 – Treason

FORFEITS ALL PROPERTY TO “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR AND BY OPERATION OF LAW FORFEITS PUBLIC OFFICE(SEE BELOW)

IN RE “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR

VS.

JOE BIDEN IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS U.S. PRESIDENT(CRIMINAL CLASS DEFENDANTS AND/OR RESPONDENT REPRESENTATIVE)THE WHITE HOUSE, U.S. CAPITOL BUILDING, THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, The Pentagon, “CRIMINAL” KAMALA HARRIS IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS VICE PRESIDENT “CRIMINAL” CLASS REPRESENTATIVE, MERRICK GARLAND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL “CRIMINAL CLASS REPRESENTATIVE,

EXECUTIVE ORDER – TO DEFRAUD ALL U.S. CITIZENS OUT OF MONEY AND/PROPERTY FORCE U.S. CITIZENS INTO SLAVERY

on behalf of one or more

INCLUDE A LIST OF DEFENDANTS AND/OR RESPONDENTS HERE

https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2021/09/22/1039293816/covid-delta-variant-fda-commissioner

Food and Drug Adminstrator(FDA)Dr. Robert Califf and/or Commissioner Stephen Hahn Hahn and FDA vaccine chief Peter Marks(and Predecessors from Jan. 1, 1993 and continuing thru to present)

The United States Federal Reserve, all Central Banks, all State Banks, Hayes Valley Limited Partnership, $1,000,000,000,000,000.00(Quadrillion )in currency(all currency including but not limited to all currency including the U.S. Dollar and/or Digital Dollar, the Chinese Yuan and/or digital yuan, Russian ruble and/or digital ruble, India rupee and/or digital rupee, etc. all cryptocurrency including but not limited to Bitcoin, USD Coin, King Charles III’s coin etc.) all tangible(including but not limited to The White House, The U.S. Department of Justice, The Department of Defense, The Supreme Court, The District Court of Columbia, The U.S. District Court of Appeals, All bank owned Real Estate[REO’s] Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac properties, McCormack Baron Salazar properties, SunAmerica Affordable Housing Partners properties etc. and intangible property(including but not limited to all types of Digital ledger Technology and/or Blockchains, Cern, ICANN, Petroleum, crude oil, fossil fuels, coal and natural gas, any and all contractual right affording a source of influence over an enterprise including but not limited to water rights via legal entitlement authorizing water to be diverted from a specified source, water, land, Papers, records, books, journals, ledgers, accounts, statements, memoranda, reports, invoices, work sheets, work papers, notes, transcriptions of notes, letters, correspondence, communications, abstracts, checks, diagrams, plans, blueprints, specifications, pictures, drawings, films, photographs, graphic representations, diaries, calendars, desk calendars, pocket calendars, lists, logs, publications, advertisements, press releases, facsimilies, newspapers, magazines, instructions, minutes, orders, bills, purchase orders, messages, resumes, summaries, for case, graphs, charts, appraisals, analytical records, reports, brochures, pamphlets, circulars, trade letters, agreements, contracts, letters of intent, telegrams, telexes, cables, recordings, audio tapes, magnetic tapes, visual tapes, transcripts of tapes or recordings, computer disks, tapes and cards, information stored in or accessible through computer or other information retrieval systems, including hard copies of electronic mail or information contained on computer hard drives, or any other writings or tangible or electronic things on which any handwriting, typing, printing, audio, visual, photographic or other forms of communication or information which are recorded or reproduced, goods and chattels, or credits and effects in the hands of garnishees to be named in the process ALL TANGIBLE AND INTANGLE PROPERTY, INCLUDING but not limited to intellectual property

brands and logos
product names
inventions and products
original software
designs
shape and appearance of a product
music
books
poems
paintings
photography
other kinds of creative work
ICANN

patents
trade marks
copyright
designs

NOTICE OF INTENT TO AMEND THIS WEBPAGE AND/OR CLAIM TO ADD ADDITIONAL DEFENDANTS AND/OR RESPONDENTS AVIA PRAECIPE TO JOIN ADDITIONAL “CRIMINAL” DEFENDANTS AND/OR RESPONDENTS

IN ADDITION

.

COMES NOW SHARON[DAVIS-ABUSALEM]BRIDGEWATER VIA “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PEOPLE OF THE 50 STATES(MY SON TWO VICTIMS AND FEDERAL WITNESSES INJURED AND DAMAGED IN BUSINESS, PERSON OR PROPERTY WITH FIRST HAND FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT(CONTINUAL VIOLENCE AND OPPRESSION, RENDERED DISABLED BY THEIR HEINOUS ACTS OR OMISSION FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING, RESTRAINED FROM INTERSTATE AND FOREIGN COMMERCE BY CORRUPT U.S. GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, INCLUDING BIDEN, HARRIS, ALL U.S. REPRESENTATIVE, ALL GOVERNORS, ETC.[A.K.A. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES] ACTING IN THEIR INDIVIDUAL WITH AN “INTERNATIONAL ADOLPH HITLER SATANIC BIOTERRORIST BIOLOGICAL WARFARE TERRORIST GROUP ENTERPRISE – RING -JACOB ROTHCHILD “LITERALLY” SATANIST, LUCIFERIAN, AND OWNER AND CONTROLLER OF MOST IF NOT ALL “GLOBAL” CENTRAL BANKS, ALL CURRENCIES, THE U.S. FEDERAL RESERVE ETC. TO DEFRAUD MY SON AND I, “TWO WITNESSES” OUT OF MONEY AND/OR PROPERTY WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW) ON BEHALF OF MY, SON, THE PEOPLE OF THE 50 STATES AND/OR HUMANITY VIA “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE 50 STATES AND/OR THE PEOPLE OF THE 50 STATES PURSUANT THE CORRUPT ORGANIZATION ACT(RICO)SEE BELOW FOR DEFINITION, TO U.S. GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS THE CORRAUTHORIZED REPRESENTIVE OF “THE 50 STATES AND/OR THE PEOPLE OF THE 50 PURSUANT TO TH CONTINUAL VIOLENCE AND OPPRESSION, RENDERED DISABLED BY THEIR HEINOUS ACTS OR OMISSION FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING TO JAN. 1, 2009 AND FURTHER CONTINUING THRU INTENTIONAL” CONTINUAL VIOLENCE AND OPPRESSION BY PRESENT)“INJURED AND DAMAGED IN BUSINESS, PERSON OR PROPERTY, RESTRAINED FROM INTERSTATE AND FOREIGN COMMERCE BY JACOB ROTHCHILD(SATAN’S REPRESENTATIVE “LITERALLY” RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CORONAVIRUS, HIV, ZIKA VIRUS, MONEY POX, TOMATO POX “LITERALLY” – SEE BELOW – PROOF” ) AND CO-CONSPIRATORS ONE OR MORE TRUMP, GARLAND, BIDEN, HARRIS, OBAMA “U.S. GOVERNMENT STATE ACTORS” CONTINUAL VIOLENCE AND OPPRESSION, RENDERED DISABLED BY THEIR HEINOUS ACTS OR OMISSION FROM JAN. 1, 1993 AND CONTINUING TO JAN. 1, 2009 AND FURTHER CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT AND THRUINTENTIONAL” CONTINUAL VIOLENCE AND OPPRESSION AND THE RUNNING OF ANY STATUE OF LIMITATION TO ADMIRALTY AND/OR MARITIME CLAIMS AND/OR CRIMINAL PROSECUTION(ETC.)IS NOT TIME BARRED ANDWITH FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE LIMITATIONS IS TOLLED –

WITNESS WITH FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE AND STANDING, “THE ONLY TWO PEOPLE IN THE WORLD PERSON IN THE WORLD DENIED COURT ACCESS SINCE AUGUST 2008 AND CONTINUING THRU TO PRESENT, AUTHORIZE(SEE AFFIDAVIT – APPEARANCE AS COUNSEL FOR THE 50 STATES)AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE 50 STATES, AND/OR “INTERNATIONAL PROSECUTOR – AS IN INTERNATIONAL PROSECUTOR” AS IN INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT

RETAILATED AGAINST IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S. Code § 1513 (ON BEHALF OF MYSELF, MY SON, ALL U.S. CITIZENS – “PEOPLE OF THE 50 STATES”) THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY AND/OR RELATOR STANDING!! COMES NOW “THE UNITED STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR PURSUANT 28 U.S.C. § 1651, AND ISSUE WRITS NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE IN AID OF THIS ADMIRALTY AND/OR MARITIME TIME “COMMON LAW” ARREST WARRANTS, FORFEITURE, ETC.

(JACOB ROTHCHILD, “THE ROCKEFELLER’S AND THEIR ASSOCIATES ALL LIABLE FOR DAMAGES AND FORFEIT PROPERTY TO “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR” – SEE THE REST OF THIS WEBPAGE)

SEE BELOW DECLARATORY JUDGMENT, BI-LATERAL CLASS REPRESENTATIVES, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION, ARREST WARRANTS IN REM AND OTHER ADMIRALITY AND/OR MARITIME DOCUMENTS

PLAINTIFF/CLAIMANT INCORPORATES THE FOLLOWING EXH. A AS FULLY SET FORTH HEREIN

THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR NOTICE OF DEMAND(CLASS REPRESENTATIVES BIDEN, HARRIS AND/OR GARLAND(ON BEHALF OF ALL U.S. LEGlSLATORS, CONGRESSMAN AND/OR WOMEN, FOREIGN OFFICIALS AND MAJOR CORPORATION FROM JAN 1, 1993 THRU TO PRESENT)REFUSE TO PAY!!

ADDITIONAL CRIMINAL INFORMATION

GOVERNMENT PARTICIPATES AS RICO(1961)(4)

“Office of the United States President”, “ Office of the United States Attorney”

“Office of the U.S. Supreme Court Justices” “Office of U.S. Legislators and/or Congressman”

A line of cases hold that any governmental agency, court, political office or the like could serve as a RICO “enterprise.” United States v. Thompson, 685 F.2d 993, 999 (6th Cir. 1982)(en banc) cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1072 (1983). Among the government units that have been held to be “enterprises” are offices of governors and state legislators, courts, court clerks’ offices. See e.g., United States v. Stratton, 649 F.2d 1066, 1072-75 (5th Cir. 1981); United States v. Clark, 656 F.2d 1259, 1261-67 (8th Cir. 1981) Office of county judge); United States v. Frumento, 405 F. Supp. 23, 29-30 (E.D. Pa. 1975), affd, 563 F.2d 1083 (3d Cir. 1977). cert, debued, 434 U.S. 1072 (1978).

In referring to the RICO liability of government offices the court thought it inconceivable that “in considering the ever more widespread tentacles of organized crime in the nation’s economic life, Congress intended to ignore an important aspect of the economy [simply] because it was state operated and state controlled ….” (563 F.2d at 1091.) Accepting defendants’ contentions would mean that “business organizatons legitimately owned and operated by the states, even though their activities substantially affect interstate commerce, would be open game for racketeers. [The court refused] to believe that Congress had such ‘tunnel-vision’ when it enacted the racketeering statute or that it intended to exclude from the protective embrace of this broad statute, designed to curb organized crime, state operated commercial ventures engaged in interstate commerce, or other governmental agencies regulating commercial and utility operations affecting interstate commerce.”Decisions after Frumento expanded government activity to every conceivable government agency, court, or political office. United States v. Thompson, 669 F.2d 1143 (6th Cir), revd 685 F.2d 993 (6th Cir. 1982)(en banc), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1072 (1983) The Enterprize “OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY .” AND “US PRESIDENT” AND CONSTITUTE A LEGAL ENTERPRIZE “OFFICE OF SUPREME COURT JUSTICE OR JUDICIAL OFFICE” LEGAL ENTEPRIZE AND ASSOCIATION“OFFICE OF ELECTIONS”

Series of Documented Acts Comprising the RICO Offenses

A criminal racketeering enterprise requires a minimum of two contiguous acts to meet the legal definition of a racketeering enterprise. Dozens of such contiguous acts are documented including but not limited to:

Repeated cover-ups, from 1993 and continuing thru the filing of this complaint, by federal judges and State Judges of ongoing documented corruption in the government’s Office of the President(White House), Office of the Attorney .(Department of Justice),[law enforcement agencies in California, Georgia, Michigan] Office of HUD(The Department of HUD), “other US Governnent Agencies,” that enabled to occur a series of major fraud on the United States which is the direct and proximate cause of the financial economic collapse −including but not limited to US Government joint participaton with Contractors fraud, Corporations , Partnerships, lawyers fraud , (under the Biden(Harris) adminitrationand Obama Bush[Iraq War],Clinton Adminstration)
War Crimes, Crimes against Humanity, Repeated Terrorist Attacks, Repeated cover-ups of the criminal activities in overt and covert government operations that the Plaintiffs(the original source)discovered while a public housing facility.
The evidence of repeated conduct constituting “continual”obstruction of justice that they knew would continue to result in great harm to the two witnesses, U.S. Citizens and/or American people , the US Government, the US Treasury and to national security.
The evidence of repeated felony retaliation against Whistleblowers such as the Plaintiff Sharon Bridgewater, and other Whistleblowers in the “Fast and furious,” “Benhi Scandle” etc. for attempting to report high-level crimes against the United States and to criminally halt ability to report such crimes.
The corrupt, illegal and unconstitutional seizure of the Plaintiff business and personal property to restrain commerce knowingly it would cause great harm and impair the Plaintiff ability to conduct commerce.
The corrupt, illegal, extortion and money laundering of US public housing tenants
The IRS corrupt, illegal and unconstitutional targeting of tea party members.
The illegal, unconstitutional “amendment” to our US Constitution right that violate US Citizens right to bear arms and/or our right to freedom of religion.
The corrupt, illegal and unconstitutional seizure of the AP Phone Records, violation of the “press” first amendment US Constitutional right.
The unconstitutional mandate of Obamacare.
Converting the courts, and their judicial positions, into a racketeering enterprise.
Perpetrating a series of predicate acts, that far exceeded the legal criteria for being a criminal racketeering enterprise.
Each of these criminal acts were compounded by the fact that they were perpetrated by people in positions of trust, who were paid to enforce the law.
Expanding on the number of parties involved in the series of predicate acts were the unknown−but suspected−Eric Holder and the U.S. Department of Justice−(and his predesors)parties that were orchestrating the multiple schemes and conspiracies and protecting each of the criminal acts of each and every one.
Several US Senators and Congressman, confirming Todd Jones ATF director when they knew and were aware of a criminal pending investigation, and schemes to defraud the USA.

RICO Details

A criminal RICO racketeering organiztion crime requires:

Two or more related predicate acts, in a conspiracy. Predicate offenses are related if they have (a) the same or similar purposes, (b) results, (c) participants, (c) victims, or (d) methods of commission.
1. Same purposes. The participants’ purpose was to defraud the two witnesses out of money and/or property without due process of law, use trick, scheme, deception, money and/or property and/or the intangle right to honest services, “inflict” extreme emotional distress on the Plaintiffs and/or Petitioners and/or other Whistleblowers(such as in Swartz case)to block Sharon Bridgewater and/or James and other “COV-19 vaccine -injection”and other Whistleblowers, the press from reporting a continuing series of corrupt, with corporations, and criminal acts of public officials joint participation with Corporations, individuals, to defraud the USA involving key people in government.
2. Results. The results included hindering and halting Sharon Bridgewaters and/or other Whistleblowers and/or the press from reporting the crime and/or ability to properly report, publicize, and halt the ongoing corruption and conspiracy to defraud the USA.
3. Participants. The participants included the repeated acts by the same people and groups, public officials including US Presidents, federal judges, Justice Department employees, lawyers, California, Michigan and judges and others acting in joint participation with each other.
4. Victims. The victims included:
  - Repeated harm to The United States of America agenSharon Bridgewater et al, other Whistleblowers, and US Citizens(the USA) and/or the press. The harm consisted of seizing the Plaitniffs personal and business assets, depriving the Plaintifff Sharon Bridgewater and/or . the right to conduct commerce; depriving the Plaintiff and/or US Citizens and/or Whistleblower through a series of unlawful and unconstitutional judicial the rights and protections guaranteed to all citizens by the laws and constitution of the United States and/or the ability of IRS official to collect taxes, and/or the ability of the Plaintiffs, Whistleblowers and/or the Press to exercise their 1^st US Constitutonal amendment right to free speech.
  - People of the United States who were harmed by the series of criminal acts and the documents actions of federal judges, Justice Public Officials, Department ofthememployees et al, and others, that enabled the crimes and resulting harm to continue.
5. Method of commission. As it relates to the current and/or former presidents, public officials, federal judges and Justice Department participants, they perpetrated a series of acts including (a) failing to report the crime to congressional members and/or the US Government Oversight Committee members(b)labeling the Plaintiffs as a vexatious ligation (c)gross prosecutial misconduct(d)acts of violence against Whistleblower for attempting to report the ongoing crimes against the United States etc.(e)failing to change IRS tax laws.

The racketeering acts were related, the intent being to halt the reporting and publicizing of high-level criminal activities.
Their actions consisted of a continuing pattern of criminal activities.
All of the actions were continuing, from 1993 thru the filing of this complaint, and arguably continuing as judicial orders still exist in several federal courts attempting to bar the Plaintiff Sharon Bridgewater and/or Whistleblowers and/or the Press from filing any papers in any federal district or appellate court. These orders knowingly obstructed justice by blocking the Plaintiff Sharon Bridgewater et al from reporting major and deadly criminal activities against the United States; and blocked the Sharon Bridgewater, Whistleblowers et al from exercising federal defenses against the pattern of civil and constitutional, and criminal acts for which they are federal causes of actions for which federal defenses exist.
The predicate acts and conspiracy gravely affected interstate commerce, and caused, or enabled to occur, a continuing series of major fraud against the USA and/or the Plaintiff which is thedirect and proximate cause of the financial ecomomic collapse and also affects interstate commerce through criminal activities in the US Government of public officials, abuse of US Government power, committing criminal acts of bribery, corruption, and for pand acting outside their scope of authority and in their individual capacities.

RICO REQUIRES NO MORE THAN

SLIGHT EFFECT UPON INTERSTATE COMMERCE

The Plaintiffs was damaged or injured in business or property. RICO Requires no more than a slight effect upon interstate commerce. United States v. Doherty, 867 F.2d 47, 68 (1st Cir. 1989). United States v. Murphy, 768 F.2d 1518, 1531 (7th Cir. 1985). cert. denied, 106 S.Ct. 1188 (1986).Predicate acts were related to the common purpose of the enterprise, defraud US taxpayers, Consumers, and/or Class Plainitff and being to halt Sharon Bridgewater and other Whistleblowers and/or the press from reporting and publicizing the ongoing criminal activities. See United States v. Bonanno Organized Crime Family, 683 F. Supp. 1411, 1437 (E.D.N.Y. 1988). All aided, abetted, counseled, commanded, induced or procured to defraud the US, taxpayers, and/or the Class Plaintiff and/or commit predicate acts as defined in 18 USC section 1961(5) and further Eric Holder and Obama obstructed justice. Further, Congress limited the force of Rule 8(b) by loosening the statutory requirements for what constitutes joint criminal activities. United States v. Friedman, 854 F.2d 535, 561 (2d Cir. 1988); United States v. Castellano, 610 F.Supp. 1359, 1396 (S.D.N.Y. 1985). If a defendant is not named in a conspiracy or RICO count, he may be charged in a separate court, in the same indictment, if he is alleged to have participated in the same series of acts or transactions that constituted the conspiracy or RICO offense. Further as far as the RICO enterprize, some benefited from the enterprise, and some did not. The racketeering activity is not required to benefit the enterprise. (The participants in the scheme are not required to have personally profited, though some did. United States v. Killip, 819 F.2d 1542, 1`549 (10th Cir. 1987. )

Some defendants agreed to join conspiracy with knowledge that other members were to commit at least two acts of racketeering. United States v. Leisure, 844 F.2d 1347, 1367 (8th Cir. 1988). See ‘ 1962(d), defendant agreed to join conspiracy with knowledge that other members were to commit at least two acts of racketeering.

In Shearin v. E.F. Hutton Group, Inc., 885 F.2d 1162 (3d Cir. 1989). The court held that Shearin, a pro se plaintiff, could recover for being fired, if she proved that it was an overt act in furtherance of an alleged ‘ 1962(d) conspiracy to bilk Hutton customers for trust services which were never performed. In Sedima the court noted that standing to sue under ” 1962(a)──(c) is based on proof that the predicate racketeering acts caused injury to plaintiff’s business or property. 473 U.S. at 495. The court also held that Sedina did not foreclose the possibility that harm arising from a conspiratorial overt act, distinct from the predicate acts listed in ‘ 1961(1), could confer standing under ‘ 1962(d). 885 F.2d at 1169-70.

Defendant was aware of the “essential nature” of the enterprise, which was a group of persons associated for the purpose of luring people into rigged card games. United States v. Joseph, 835 F.2d 1149, 1152 (6th Cir. 1987); in United States v. Gallo, 667 F. Supp. 1359, 1401, (S.D.N.Y. 1985), the defendant must have knowledge of the enterprise and at least some of its criminal activities; Defendant must have been aware of at least the . existence of the enterprise (United States v. Castellano, 610 F.Supp. 1359, 1401 (E.D.N.Y. 1985); in order to prove RICO conspiracy count government must show the existence of a “unified agreement to participate in the affairs of the enterprise through a pattern of racketeering ….”

The court held that § 1962(c) does not require concerted criminal activity, only that an individual commit at least two acts of racketeering while participating in the conduct of an enterprise. United States v. Castallano, 610 F.Supp. 1359, 1392-1396 (S.D.N.Y. 1985). Id at 1394.

RICO Violations Involving A
Continuing Series of ATTACK ON THE PLAINTIFFS AND OTHER WHISTLEBLOWERS

Dozens of separate predicate acts were perpetrated to block Sharon Bridgewater and/or Whistleblowers and/or the press from reporting ongoing criminal activities in high-level overt and covert operations involving government employees. That constituted claims under ‘ 1962(a),(b), (c), and (d), in factual allegations.

1. RICO violators within the Office of the President, Office of the Attorney ., Office of HUD, et al conspired with each other to halt the former Sharon Bridgewater and/or other Whistleblowers, “ the press” to disclose their major fraud, and/or to inflict economic hardship on the Plaintiff, restrain commerce, cause the Plaintiff suffering, and prevent the Plaintff from carrying out her responsibilities to report the crimes, all while all were either operating, directly or managing federal funds, and or Offices of the US Government.

All Aided and abetted the repeated massive RICO violations and violated the Plaintiff civil right repeatedly.
Federal judges as RICO violators, entered the conspiracy, and continued actively from 2008 and continuing thru the filing of this complaint. Their predicate acts included:

Repeatedly blocking the Sharon Bridgewater complaint to halt the ability of the Plainiff to report the crime
Entering a vexatious ligatant order
Vacacating settlement conferences.
Issued a series of unlawful and unconstitutional orders, with criminal intent, to halt the Plaintiffs ability to report the crimes.
Corruptly, through violation of federal laws and constitutional protections, defrauded the USA in amounts in excess of 50(fifty) trillion dollars and knew and were aware ththey did not have the authority to schme and defraud, the USA.
Lawyers as RICO participants, aided, abetted the these corporations, partnerships, President and corporations, et al engaged in a series of unlawful lawsuits from 1993 and thru the filing of this complaint, that violated blocks of state and federal laws and constitutional protections, that required the corrupt cooperation of Federal judges and federal judges.

ROTHCHILD AND CO-CONSPIRATORS, BIDEN(AND PREDECESSORS FROM JAN. 1, 1993 THRU TO PRESENT)INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGES, COMMITTED WIRE FRAUD, MAIL FRAUD LAUNDER MONEY THRU ALL CENTRAL BANKS AND/OR THE FEDERAL RESERVE, THE WHITE HOUSE, THE U.S. CAPITOL BUILDING IN WASHINGTON D.C. U.S. DEFENSE DEPARTMENT, CDC ETC.(REAL PROPERTY) ALL WERE involved in a transaction or attempted transaction in violation of section 1956, 1957 or 1960 of this title, or any property traceable to such property.

ALL COMMITTED CRIMES OF COVID – 19 BIOLOGICAL WARFARE, (B) Any property, real or personal, within the jurisdiction of the United States, constituting, derived from, or traceable to, any proceeds obtained directly or indirectly from an offense against a foreign nation, or any property used to facilitate such an offense, if the offense— (i) involves trafficking in nuclear, chemical, biological, or radiological weapons technology or material, or the manufacture, importation, sale, or distribution of a controlled substance (as that term is defined for purposes of the Controlled Substances Act), or any other conduct described in section 1956 (c)(7)(B);

(ii) would be punishable within the jurisdiction of the foreign nation by death or imprisonment for a term exceeding 1 year; and

(iii) would be punishable under the laws of the United States by imprisonment for a term exceeding 1 year, if the act or activity constituting the offense had occurred within the jurisdiction of the United States.

ALL REAL property, real or personal, which constitutes or is derived from proceeds traceable to a violation of section 215, 471, 472, 473, 474, 476, 477, 478, 479, 480, 481, 485, 486, 487, 488, 501, 502, 510, 542, 545, 656, 657, 670, 842, 844, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1014, 1028, 1029, 1030, 1032, or 1344 of this title or any offense constituting “specified unlawful activity” (as defined in section 1956 (c)(7) of this title), or a conspiracy to commit such offense.

(D) Any property, real or personal, which represents or is traceable to the gross receipts obtained, directly or indirectly, from a violation of— (i) section 666 (a)(1) (relating to Federal program fraud);

(ii) section 1001 (relating to fraud and false statements);

(iii) section 1031 (relating to major fraud against the United States);

(iv) section 1032 (relating to concealment of assets from conservator or receiver of insured financial institution);

(v) section 1341 (relating to mail fraud); or

(vi) section 1343 (relating to wire fraud),

if such violation relates to the sale of assets acquired or held by the the [1] Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as conservator or receiver for a financial institution, or any other conservator for a financial institution appointed by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency or the National Credit Union Administration, as conservator or liquidating agent for a financial institution.

(E) With respect to an offense listed in subsection (a)(1)(D) committed for the purpose of executing or attempting to execute any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent statements, pretenses, representations or promises, the gross receipts of such an offense shall include all property, real or personal, tangible or intangible, which thereby is obtained, directly or indirectly.

(F) Any property, real or personal, which represents or is traceable to the gross proceeds obtained, directly or indirectly, from a violation of— (i) section 511 (altering or removing motor vehicle identification numbers);

(ii) section 553 (importing or exporting stolen motor vehicles);

(iii) section 2119 (armed robbery of automobiles);

(iv) section 2312 (transporting stolen motor vehicles in interstate commerce); or

(v) section 2313 (possessing or selling a stolen motor vehicle that has moved in interstate commerce).

(G) All assets, foreign or domestic— (i) of any individual, entity, or organization engaged in planning or perpetrating any any [1] Federal crime of terrorism (as defined in section 2332b (g)(5)) against the United States, citizens or residents of the United States, or their property, and all assets, foreign or domestic, affording any person a source of influence over any such entity or organization;

(ii) acquired or maintained by any person with the intent and for the purpose of supporting, planning, conducting, or concealing any Federal crime of terrorism (as defined in section 2332b (g)(5) [2] against the United States, citizens or residents of the United States, or their property;

(iii) derived from, involved in, or used or intended to be used to commit any Federal crime of terrorism (as defined in section 2332b (g)(5)) against the United States, citizens or residents of the United States, or their property; or

(iv) of any individual, entity, or organization engaged in planning or perpetrating any act of international terrorism (as defined in section 2331) against any international organization (as defined in section 209 of the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956 (22 U.S.C. 4309 (b)) or against any foreign Government. [3] Where the property sought for forfeiture is located beyond the territorial boundaries of the United States, an act in furtherance of such planning or perpetration must have occurred within the jurisdiction of the United States. (H) Any property, real or personal, involved in a violation or attempted violation, or which constitutes or is derived from proceeds traceable to a violation, of section 2339C of this title.

(2) For purposes of paragraph (1), the term “proceeds” is defined as follows: (A) In cases involving illegal goods, illegal services, unlawful activities, and telemarketing and health care fraud schemes, the term “proceeds” means property of any kind obtained directly or indirectly, as the result of the commission of the offense giving rise to forfeiture, and any property traceable thereto, and is not limited to the net gain or profit realized from the offense.

(B) In cases involving lawful goods or lawful services that are sold or provided in an illegal manner, the term “proceeds” means the amount of money acquired through the illegal transactions resulting in the forfeiture, less the direct costs incurred in providing the goods or services. The claimant shall have the burden of proof with respect to the issue of direct costs. The direct costs shall not include any part of the overhead expenses of the entity providing the goods or services, or any part of the income ta

ALL IS FORFEITED TO SHARON[DAVIS- ABUSALEM]BRIDGEWATER VIA “THE 50 STATES EX REL PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR

The evidence showed a nexus between the racketeering activities and the enterprise, the goal of which was to overthrow the US Constitution, deprive and/or denied the Plaintiffs rights as secured by international and/or nation treaties(the US Constituion), and defraud US Taxpayers, Consumer the intangle right to honest services and overthrow the US Govenrment prevent the Class Plaintiffs and/or Petitioners from reporting and exposure of a continuing pattern of corrupt and criminal activities that were inflicting, and would continue to inflict, great harm upon the United States.

18 U.S. Code § 2339B – Providing material support or resources to designated foreign terrorist organizations

ALL CORRUPT!!

IN ADDITION

.

Share this: