DEFINITION FOR PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR; AND AUTHORITY, STANDING TO OBTAIN ALL RELIEF AS FOLLOWS:

The Racketeered Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act permit private individual law permits common law remedies for admirality and/or maritime claims, no right to a jury trial. The private attorney General act permit a private person injured and damaged in business, person or property to act as an prosecutors, “private attorneys general,” 1) to eliminate racketeering activity, 2) to enforce a legal right that benefits the community as a whole, to enforce policy inherent in public interest legislation on behalf of a significant class of persons.

Private Attorney General

A private attorney general is a private citizen who brings a lawsuit considered to be in the public interest, i.e., benefiting the general public and community as a whole. The “private attorney general” concept holds that a successful private party plaintiff is entitled to recovery of his legal expenses, including attorney fees, if he has advanced the policy inherent in public interest legislation on behalf of a significant class of persons. — USLegal.com
https://definitions.uslegal.com/p/private-attorney-general/

While Congress can constitutionally authorize no one, in the absence of an actual justiciable controversy, to bring a suit for the judicial determination either of the constitutionality of a statute or the scope of powers conferred by a statute upon government officers, it can constitutionally authorize one of its own officials, such as the Attorney General, to bring a proceeding to prevent another official from acting in violation of his statutory powers; for then an actual controversy exists, and the Attorney General can properly be vested with authority, in such a controversy, to vindicate the interest of the public or the government. Instead of designating the Attorney General, or some other public officer, to bring such proceedings, Congress can constitutionally enact a statute[25] conferring on any non-official person, or on a designated group of non-official persons, authority to bring a suit to prevent action by an officer in violation of his statutory powers; for then, in like manner, there is an actual controversy, and there is nothing constitutionally prohibiting Congress from empowering any person, official or not, to institute a proceeding involving such a controversy, even if the sole purpose is to vindicate the public interest. Such persons, so authorized, are, so to speak, private Attorney Generals.
Associated Industries v. Ickes, 134 F.2d 694 (2d Cir. 1943)
http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/134/694/1479302/

The “private attorney general” phrase was coined by Judge Jerome Frank in a decision which did not involve an attorney fee at all, but rather a private citizen’s standing to sue for vindication of a public objective. (Associate Industries v. Ickes (2d Cir. 1943) 134 F.2d 694, 704; Comment (1974) 122 U.Pa.L.Rev. 636, 658.)
County of Inyo v. City of Los Angeles, 78 Cal.App.3d 82 (1978)
http://law.justia.com/cases/california/court-of-appeal/3d/78/82.html
T

he term private attorney general was coined by Judge Jerome Frank in the context of a challenge to a private persons standing to bring a lawsuit to vindicate the public interest. (County of Inyo v. City of Los Angeles (1978) 78 Cal.App.3d 82, 88, fn. 1, citing Associated Industries v. Ickes (2d Cir. 1943) 134 F.2d 694, 704.) It is meant to convey the concept that a private citizen may stand in the shoes of the Attorney General, not in the sense of an attorney representing a party in court, but in the sense of a government official advancing the public interest in a lawsuit. Indeed, in most instances, a private attorney general is a private citizen represented by counsel in court.
http://www.fearnotlaw.com/wsnkb/articles/altmann_v_cityofagourahillscity_council-24093.html
Altmann v. City of Agoura Hills City Council
Court of Appeal of the State of California
Second Appellate District, Division Four

RELATOR DEFINITION: #1 Definition: A legal dictionary defines the term “Relator” this way: “A party in interest who is permitted to institute a proceeding in the name of the People or the Attorney General when the right to sue resides solely in that official.” (Black’s Law Dictionary 1289 (6th ed.) #2 Definition: The person upon whose complaint, or at whose instance, an information or writ of quo warranto is filed, and who is quasi the plaintiff In the proceeding.

COMMON LAW REMEDIES PERMIT “THE 50 STATES EX REL SHARON BRIDGEWATER PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND/OR RELATOR TO ACT AS “ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE U.S.” AND/OR THEE 50 STATES:

(b)The Attorney General may institute proceedings under this section. Pending final determination thereof, the court may at any time enter such restraining orders or prohibitions, or take such other actions, including the acceptance of satisfactory performance bonds, as it shall deem proper.

(c) Any person injured in his business or property by reason of a violation of section 1962 of this chapter may sue therefor in any appropriate United States district court and shall recover threefold the damages he sustains and the cost of the suit, including a reasonable attorney’s fee, except that no person may rely upon any conduct that would have been actionable as fraud in the purchase or sale of securities to establish a violation of section 1962 AND prevent and restrain violations of section 1962 of this chapter by issuing appropriate orders, including, but not limited to: ordering any person to divest himself of any interest, direct or indirect, in any enterprise; imposing reasonable restrictions on the future activities or investments of any person, including, but not limited to, prohibiting any person from engaging in the same type of endeavor as the enterprise engaged in, the activities of which affect interstate or foreign commerce; or ordering dissolution or reorganization of any enterprise, making due provision for the rights of innocent persons.

(d) A final judgment or decree rendered in favor of the United States in any criminal proceeding brought by the United States under this chapter shall estop the defendant from denying the essential allegations of the criminal offense in any subsequent civil proceeding brought by the United States.

STANDING – SEE INTERVENTION ON THIS WEBSITE